19 pp, Oct 2010, Updated consequence of the illegal type 2 drivers policy

Updated Consequence, (began May 2002 - 2004) (This letter has just been through a much needed edit and update, Oct 9, 2010)

Updated Consequence, (began May 2002 - 2004), Jan-Feb, June, Oct 2010

The Truth about the Diabetic Drivers' Policy


First of all, there really isn't a Diabetic Drivers Policy as I have Not received one and I've been asking since 2002, it is now Oct 2010.
The Diabetic Drivers' Policy has not been justified through the demands of our Constitution, the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, Section 1, the Human Rights Code, Section 8, nor the Motor Vehicle Act, statutes 25, 29, and 92. So, it is illegal and based upon civil servants bias, prejudice, hate, ignorance, fear and loathing, contempt, and disgust of the diabetic and the disabled as diabetics are labeled disabled for driving.


The Five Points of Engagement

1. Is the 'need' for intervention really there? Modern science says No. Is the policy a real 'need' or just a 'want'. It is a 'want' of unknown senior civil servants. The gov't bases the policy on their “view” that it is ok to do. Sorry, Canadian civil servants' “view” of the world is not good enough as there are Laws to follow and their Oath of Office 'needs' to be fulfilled. So why do it? Why do it knowing the consequences?

2. Can the 'intervention' really do what it is alleged to be able to do? No. The Driver's Medical Examination, DME, cannot predict, prevent, and manage hypoglycemia, the very reason for the policy. So why do it? Why do it knowing the consequences?

3. What are the 'consequences of the intervention'? The consequences kill and maim hundreds of naïve bystanders every year. The policy causes Emerge Overcrowding and surgery wait-lists. (The policy endangered my life in May 2009 as I was told I needed to wait two years for spinal surgery and yet tax dollars are used to pay for the illegal DME, which not been proved it does anything but harm.) It also causes the long wait-lists to visit a General Practitioner, GP; as they are filling out these illegal policy forms. So why do it? Why do it knowing the consequences? (The following will prove the Consequences and you will come to know why the gov't and their civil servants and others refuse to acknowledge the consequences)(Go to wikipedia and look at Genocide, then Democide; the killing of large numbers of people due to gov't policy.)
Never forget this policy is still illegal, Oct 6, 2010, that is why the gov't stole research to justify the policy. I caught them and the research was not presented again. This means the defense of the policy was withdrawn in BC Human Rights Complaint, #5791, 2008. So, why are the corrupt gov't civil servants still running the policy? Why did the HRT not acknowledge the stolen documents? Why are these thieves and liars still employed? Why are they still employed knowing what we know about the consequences of the policy?

4. Is there 'any Good'? No. The gov't has stated it has never studied the policy for any Good. How insane is that? Reader, if there is no documentation to justify the policy in the first instance how can there be any known change to prove Good? Secondly, as modern science states there is no problem to begin with how can there be any change to prove Good?
Third, if the policy is based up some corrupt civil servants “view” of the world how can they prove Good?
This lack of accountability defines discrimination. It exemplifies bias, prejudice, hate, ignorance, fear and loathing, disgust, and contempt for people and Canadian Law and Human Rights. It defines Corrupt people. So why do it? Why do it knowing the consequences?

5. And “Where are we now?”
Reader, for my diabetes care I visit the GP twenty(20) times compared to the one (1) time I am forced to visit the GP for the policy and the Driver Medical Examination, DME for a private or personal license. This is never acknowledged by the gov't. Why? For my Class 4 license I visit eight (8) times to the one (1) time. Why has the policy continued on knowing this about the personal diabetic care? Why continue with the policy knowing the killing, maiming, endangerment of life and negative influence upon those needing bona fide medical demands?
Why has this never been acknowledged by the gov't, the Human Rights Tribunal, and the 'civil servant lawyers' attacking me instead of the illegal policy? Why are doctors and I forced to comply with the demands of an illegal policy? Why do it knowing the above? Hate? Lust for power? Denial of Responsibility and Accountability? Denial of Mass Murder? Denial of Genocide? Denial of Democide? They have gone to far over the Edge and they know it, therefore the denials, charades, theft, and lies to bury it.

Reader, you should know that my first human rights complaint saw a change in who pays for the DME; #1954, 2004-2006. The gov't now pays $75 for the diabetic DME, I do not know what they pay disabled drivers that pay $1000 or more for their DME, whereas before August 2006 the diabetic or disabled driver needed to pay whatever the doctor charged for a 'non-necessary medical' examination, usually about $150.00. On the surface this is good thing but the taxes used to pay for this illegal policy and its non-necessary demands on the health care system, which offers No Good, should be used for 'necessary medical' demands, surgeries, which offer Good and are legal.
Secondly, shuffling taxes to pay for an illegal policy is fraud. Add that the policy offers no good, which is demanded by Law, is what kind of legal quagmire due to the consequences? It's Homicide isn't it. Death due to indifference to human life? Homicide, reckless endangerment to human life causing death?
The first death is an accident, the second the policy should have been put on hold, the third death is Homicide, the four is Serial Killer, the fifth is Mass Murder, the tenth is Democide.

About the DME fee payment. The initial payment of GP fees is through the Universal Health Care system, giving it a false marriage to the UHCS as it only pays for medical necessary medical demands. So the reader of the Form, or user, or public is lead to believe something that is not true. Taxes are then shuffled from the Solicitor General's Office to repay the UHCS as the DME is not a medical necessity and someone somewhere has demanded the UHCS be refunded. Why has this person not complained about the illegal policy making illegal demands upon the UHCS that don't do anything positive or Good but waste GP time and energy.
The shuffling of taxes to pay for the DME is to make the policy look legal, as why would the gov't pay for the demands of an illegal policy. This is just another charade, a false marriage, done to give the policy the look of legitimacy by corrupt civil servants. Why indeed?
Isn't the shuffling of taxes to pay for an illegal policy and its demands upon the health care system fraud? This is an example of the charades played out by the gov't and its counsel that you really need to work through as it is all done to present that the policy is legal, therefore the killing is legally justified. (Killing is acceptable, how do they come to that conclusion, especially when Canada has a Non-Capital Punishment Policy? A Policy that does not allow gov't to kill. This means illegal policy and its consequences such as this policy.)

The $75 comes from what my GP charged for the DME. He is forced to give the DME, knows it cannot do what it is alleged to be able to do, and does no Good, therefore he charged only half the going rate. It's called civil disobedience on his behalf. So, you can hear the gov't, 'if that is all this doctor wants to charge that is all they will get'. The pettiness is unbelievable considering they know the policy is illegal and does nothing good. Their corruption is all consuming.
The gov't reimbursed my DME fees as part to the breached out of court settlement agreement concerning discrimination complaint #1954 and that is how they came to know what he charged.
Now, All GPs administering the DME do not get paid properly for their time.
***

Reimbursement of Drivers' Examination Fees

Yes, as part of the Settlement Agreement for BCHRT Discrimination Complaint #1954 I was offered the reimbursement of the DME fees, about $200. As so many people do not talk about their diabetes and Discrimination I did not understand that every other diabetic driver or disabled driver were not reimbursed their fees. When I asked the OSMV to explain this they refused to respond to my questions little lone the acknowledgment of my letters.
As the OSMV not only changed who gets their DME fee paid for, my complaint for type 2, but type 1 and Gestational drivers also. Not only that but All Disabled Drivers. I did not ask for this, it was freely offered as a promise or proposition of the settlement agreement.
So, when the scope or point of my complaint was changed, from type 2 to All Disabled why wouldn't All Disabled Drivers be reimbursed their fees? Why wouldn't you expect the change for All fee payments to be carried forward to All fee reimbursement? It is logical. Don't forget, in Human Rights Complaints there is the expectation of Good Will, the Social Contract of Equality and Fairness. What you do for one you do for all or it is Discrimination. Out side of a HRT discrimination complaint what you do for one you do for all or it is Discrimination with no just reason.
Don't forget, type 1s and Gestational diabetics are also paying for an DME that has not fulfilled The Five Points of Engagement and the policy is illegal for them as well. Why shouldn't they be reimbursed for their fees as they paid them under the threat of loosing one's license and the belief that the policy is legal, which it isn't and offers Good which it doesn't.
If the OSMV runs an illegal policy for diabetics, broke the settlement agreement, refused to renew it or make an amendment to it, has not produced the promised Policy to make it legal, stole research in an effort to legally justify the policy and when caught lied about this theft, and still have not acknowledged the consequences of the policy, the known killing, maiming, and endangerment to life, fraudulent use of taxes to pay for an illegal policy, and broke their Oath of Office then why should anyone believe the other 100 medical conditions monitored by the OSMV are legal demands?

My point is, to not reimburse All Disabled Drivers the OSMV needed to consciously decide to not reimburse all other disabled drivers. To consciously do this is Discrimination. They made a conscious decision to inform All Disabled Drivers that they would not need to pay for the DME fee, so to not reimburse they also needed to consciously make the decision not to reimburse.

Secondly, it is not the OSMV money that is to be reimbursed, it is tax payers that have paid for illegal examinations that cannot do what they are alleged to be able to do and offer not Good, Kill, Maim, and Endanger lives such as happened to me in May 2009 when I needed spinal surgery or I would loose control of my lower bowels. All because the corrupt civil servants run this illegal policy and now pay for it with our taxes. Using taxes for a illegal policy which makes an illegal demand upon the health care system.
If the reimbursement happened it would then be very public as it would be in the $50-75 000 000 range for All Disabled Drivers going back to when, 1999 when I was forced to comply with the DME? To at least 2002 when I began my inquiry. Year 1 $75, year end $75, four years later, $75, five years later, $75 is $300 times 400 000 diabetic drivers, is $30 000 000. Then add the fees for the other 100 medical conditions that are monitored. Or to when the policy was invented and still not legally justified, 1982 with the Constitution or Canadian Human Rights Act of 1978?
If this amount of taxes were reimbursed it would bring questions about the why of the reimbursement. This would expose the illegal policy, the failure of the DME, the killing, maiming, the endangerment of life, the illegal demand upon the Universal Health Care System and the fraudulent use of taxes to pay for an illegal policy.
So, you can see why these corrupt civil servants did not reimburse All Disabled Drivers and why the HRT did not mention that the policy is illegal and that the OSMV broke the Settlement Agreement and did not renew it.
The above is why I lodge the Representative Complaint #5699, written up online by the HRT in 2008.
I did not loose this complaint through lack of value or worth but due to the fact that the HRT would not define the date of when I needed to have my complaint lodged by, which is a six month timeline. This may sound strange but remember, the OSMV broke the Settlement Agreement and did not renew it or make an amendment to it, therefore there is no established date that one can say is the beginning day for the six month timeline. So, the HRT does not mention this in their Decision about the complaint. Why?
Interesting stuff, eh.
***

A review

1. The Drivers' Medical Examination, DME, has not been proved to be able to do what it is Alleged to be able to do; that is, predict, prevent, and manage hypoglycemia. (Think about how Corrupt that mind-set is).

2. The policy cannot do what it is alleged to be able to do; that is predict, prevent, and manage hypoglycemia.

3. The Policy is based upon the supposed consequences of diabetes and its impact on diabetic drivers and yet the gov't is steadfast in refusing to acknowledge the Consequences of its actions; this duality is called Discrimination.
Secondly, the Consequences include turning the diabetic into a pariah, is responsible for long Wait-Times to see a GP due to the fact that the GP is forced to comply and fulfill the demands of DME and Form, there is Emerge Overcrowding, which comes from long wait-times to see a GP because she or he is filling out useless Forms, therefore their clients go to Emerge, (Emerge doctors report fifty,(50%), of Emerge clients should not be there). This false demand on the Emerge changes wait-times for bona fide Emerge needs as well as the overall care of all clients. There are also changes to ambulatory care, as they can not just drop clients off to an Overcrowded Emerge and drive away. Emerge hospital admissions are not the same as managed GP or Specialist admission, which changes management of such. All this is responsible for the recent sanctioning of Private Health Care to deal with the overcrowding in Emerge facilities, which the gov't itself has created, not the public. (Think about how Corrupt that mind-set is). Yes, I was forced to pay for my spinal surgery, $10 000.
This is corrupt gov't blaming the public when it is their constructed problem and look what they have done to cover it up.

Reader, always remember that the Consequences of the policy, the Policy Harm is a Conscious Constructed Harm compared to the supposed diabetic drivers' Harm, the Accidental driver mishap. We are allowed to consciously harm? We are allowed to run policy that kills? (Think about how corrupt that mind-set is).

4. The Policy has not been proved to offer any Good, (Think about how Corrupt that mind-set is).

5. Lastly, diabetics visit their doctors 8 to 1, for a two year Class 4 license or 20 times to 1 for a five year Private license and the OSMV does not inform the public of such. (Think about how Corrupt that mind-set is).
Why does the OSMV not inform the public of such?

My point is, you are not informed because it exemplifies how diabetics do care for themselves, thus society. It debunks the 'Other', the 'Pariah' that the OSMV, the gov't, and the anti-diabetic lobby has created and supports through this unjustified policy and lies that the policy saves lives, that the diabetic is a killer.
Reader, this is why doctors are legislated to complete the DME and Form. The resulting consequences of the DME are in direct violation to their Code of Ethics; they are not allowed to harm clients, little lone turn them into a pariah, which this unjustified anti-diabetic policy does. The legislation supposedly protects them from the harm the DME does to the client, the diabetic, the disabled, and the public. Does it really? What kind of stress does this put on doctors?
What kind of doctor supports this illegal policy? A Nazi. What kind of doctor invented the perverted DME? A Nazi. What kind of doctor supports this policy when there is no need and no Good? A Nazi.
***

Capital Punishment and the Office of the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles' Homicide

Canada has a policy of Non-Capital Punishment. In other words the gov't has a policy that it cannot kill people no matter what they do.
So, how is it that the gov't runs an illegal diabetic drivers' policy that has a consequence of death; those unexpected and unexplained deaths in an Overcrowded Emerge that Emerge doctors hold Press Conferences about? The Overcrowding is constructed by gov't itself and they know it?
This killing is called Democide, the killing of large numbers of the public by gov't policy. Even if the policy was legal it would not be allowed as it kills people, maims and endangers lives. Always remember the policy has been illegal since my initial inquiry of 2002-2004 and still illegal today, October 5, 2010 and the gov't knows full well the consequences.
***

Consequences of the Diabetic Driver's Medical Examination, (DME)

The following scenario follows from the Ministry of Health letter, # 679719, “Received Mar 28/07”.
Lets just use the gov't presentation of diabetes for now. The population of BC is approximately 4.2 million with approximately 9% diabetics = 378 000 diabetics.
Type 1s are approximately 0.45% - 0.9% with type 2s being 8.1 - 8.55% of the population. We’re a driving society so I’ve said all diabetics are drivers as I’m not privy to the actual numbers. Most diabetics are over sixteen, driving age, therefore we can use all diabetics.
378 000 diabetics x 1hr DME and Form = 378 000 hrs of GPs time / 2080 hrs a year of a GP time (52 weeks x 40 hrs a clinic week) (no weeks off as another doctor would take her place.) = 181 doctors are forced to do the exam
Reader, this is Important, doctors are legislated to perform the DME, they have no choice. Has the gov't really established a degree of separation from the Doctors' Code of Ethics; Do no harm, which then allows doctors to be forced to do the exam? They comply under the threat of penalty just as diabetics comply under threat of loss of license.
Hold it. Reader, there is a Cycle here, there’s the first examination at diagnosis, then at years’ end, then again on the fifth year, most diabetics have a private license so let’s say a five-year cycle for convenience and minimums. Commercial diabetic licenses and type 1s really are insignificant. So, for our purposes the cycle of DME is a five year cycle.
Therefore, there is the equivalent of 36 doctors needed per year just to do the diabetic examination. (181/5yrs = 36 doctors) That's all they would do. Complete the DME and its Form, which have not been legally Justified in the first place nor proved to be able to do any Good. Always remember this, it has not been justified by the demands our Constitution, the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, Section 1, nor the Human Rights Code, Section 8, nor the statutes of the Motor Vehicle Act, Sections 25, 29, and 92. So, what is it based upon? Fear? Fear and loathing? Hate?
I've been writing since 2002, so the policy is not based upon ignorance.

My point is, what kind of people continue on with such an illegal policy knowing it kills, maims and endangers lives?

Lastly, due to the harm shouldn't the policy have been put on hold until the policy was evaluated as needed, proof of Good, and that the policy was/is not harming? Too late as they know it is Mass Murder, Homicide, or Democide.
***

Now we get to the Really interesting part of this illegal and unjustified medical demand.

36 doctors x 52 weeks of work x 40 hrs a week x 8 clients per hour = 599 040 clients a year.
That’s how many clients have their Availability to Basic Health Care changed due to the OSMV’ policy against diabetic drivers. Simple numbers, no statistics or formula to screw with your mind, just numbers to prove a point.
If it takes longer than one (1) hr to complete the DME and Form or more than eight (8) clients per hour just imagine the number of clients that have their basic availability to health changed, delayed. So, where do they go for basic health care? That’s right, they go to Emergency Facilities and create Overcrowding. Gov't created overcrowding.
If we divide 599 040 clients that have their Availability of Basic Care changed by the number of major hospitals that are experiencing over-crowding in BC, say 10 as most of the 100 or so hospitals do not experience Overcrowding as the 10 largest do.
So, we realize that the major hospitals could have as many as 599 040/10 = 59 904 more clients per year visit them because clients cannot access their GP within a reasonable time. I now wait 5-7 days. It has changed since I have become diabetic, 1999.
59 904/365 days per year = an extra 164 clients a day and this goes on 24/7/52 and we wonder where over half the people in the emergency facilities come from. (TV news casts have emerge doctors stating 50% of clients should not be in emerge.)
No wonder the OSMV does not want to respond to my questions about the Consequences of their unjustified medical policy against diabetic drivers. I began my inquiry in July 2002. It is now June 2009, now Oct 2010.
So, we have an extra 164 clients a day that could visit the emerge for their needs, for the 10 busiest hospitals, 24/7/365.

This number is very similar to the number of extra people visiting emerge according to a BCTV news program the second week of February 2007.)
I realize that not all people will attend an emergency facility but I did with my kids and my wife’s parents and mine in their time of need. We stood behind people such as ourselves and you stood behind me. Yes, both my parents went to Emerge because they know people are dying there and shouldn't be. So, after 50 years together one was not going to see the other die in a hall or closet without being there. They have the right to be there together. This Overcrowding and Overkill creates this increase of bodies in Emerge because we do not trust the Emerge as a place to be. This is also a constructed harm to society from corrupt civil servants and gov't.
It is said that approximately 55-65% of the users of the medical system are responsible for approximately 80% of the use. This means that the people that use the medical system are the people that will use the Emerge if their availability to basic health care changes or the Wait-Time to visit their doctor is too long. Who is the real liability here? Not the diabetic. Not the public.
Always remember, this is for diabetes only. What about the other 100 or so medical conditions the OSMV says it manages? If they have nothing for diabetes what do they have for the other conditions? More bias, prejudice, hate, fear and loathing, lies, disgust, contempt, and misinformation?
***

The Future of Diabetes

Diabetes is supposed to become an epidemic; this means 1 in 3 or 1 in 4. If it really is 1 in 11 now or 9%, then 1 in 3 means 33% and 1 in 4 means 25% of society. 9% to 33% is about a 4 fold increase, where 9% to 25% is about a 3 fold increase.
So, we must multiply the above numbers by the factor of 3 or 4; 36 doctors x 4 = 144, this gives us 144 doctors just to complete the DME and Form or 36 x 3 = 108 just to fulfill the DME and Form, which offers no Good, etc, etc.
From the above Section, 164 extra clients a day to each of the 10 busiest Emerge facilities. This is then increased by a factor of 3 or 4. So, in the near future, approximately 164 x 3 = 492 and 164 x 4 =656 or an average of an extra 574 clients a day to the 10 busiest hospitals as we move forward to the epidemic the gov't is predicting.
If the OSMV, gov't, does not acknowledge this demand now, fund it, therefore manage it, how will they do it in the future? They won't as they are corrupt and the deaths will be just more roadkill to the Motor Vehicle civil servants.
Important, these numbers are for Diabetes Only. What is the number for all the conditions the OSMV supposedly manages?
There are approximately 100 different conditions that are supposedly a liability and managed by the OSMV.
100 conditions x 36 GPs a condition = 3600 GPs plus the 36 for diabetes and you have 70-75% of GPs filling out Forms for the corrupt civil servants in the OSMV and their illegal policy.
The above doctors per condition does not seem reasonable but who knows with these monsters and their killing policy and the denial of their consequences.
So, lets cut it by a third.
100 conditions x 10 GPs a condition = 1000 GPs plus the 36 for diabetes. The OSMV is taking 20-25% of the General Practitioners out of the Universal Medical System for its unjustified wants. Who is the liability here?
If the government has not justified the diabetes policy and never proved any Good why should we believe it has justified the other conditions it supposedly manages? Have they proved there really is a problem and is there any Good from those interventions? How many times do those people visit their doctor compared to the forced visits demanded by the OSMV?
Additionally, what other medical demands does the gov't force upon the UHCS? And, are these already, like diabetes, managed by a doctor?
***

What is not told by the Government

Reader, the gov't does not acknowledge diabetics visit doctors and are medically managed by doctors, especially if using medications. Hypoglycemia, Low Blood Sugar, the supposed problem with diabetic drivers is really due to the use of some medications used to lower diabetic High Blood Sugar levels due to diabetes. The medications are Prescription only, doctor driven. (By the way, hypoglycemia is not dependent upon diabetes. Why is this fact not acknowledged by gov't and the anti-diabetic lobby?)
My point is, only some medications cause hypoglycemia, the most common medication used by type 2s is Not a hypoglycemia inducing medication. The gov't does not inform readers of this fact. Why are you misinformed?

Reader, every three months I go for blood and urine samples, then visit the doctor for the results, talk about diabetes, and renew my medications, as they are not over-the-counter medications.
How conveniently the gov't does NOT inform the public that diabetics do manage their health with doctors as well as themselves. Again, I visit the doctor 8 times for care compared to the 1 (once) every two years demanded by gov't, that is 8-1 for my Class 4 Commercial license and type 2. With a private license it would be 20 visits to the 1 forced gov't visit, or 20 to 1. Why hasn't the OSMV and the anti-diabetic lobby informed you of this? Why didn't the HRT acknowledge this?
Lastly, do you really think the gov't forced visit every five (5) years has any Worth or Value? What worth? The doctor sees me every 3 months and its voluntary by both of us. Its Proactive, a Medical Necessity, and offers Good compared to a forced visit, a Non-Medical Necessity, and offers No Good. Where is the value?

Reader, now you know these facts, you need to think about how corrupt the anti-diabetic lobby and policy really are. By not acknowledging that diabetics do visit doctors it exemplifies the misrepresentation and discrimination towards diabetics. It really is unacceptable. It exemplifies how corrupt the government and the anti-diabetic lobby is in this matter of diabetes and liability. The diabetic policy has so much liability attached to it the government cannot afford to address the numbers from above, or that diabetics do take responsibility for their condition, and that doctors are responsible and manage their clients.
The corruption of our Social Contract of fair play, honesty, social standards, good intentions, and accountability is beyond the government now.
Don't forget, the gov't uses the Charter to say it has the right to manage driving, but it must fulfill the whole idea within the Charter; it must demonstrably justify the want as a bona fide need and acknowledge the Consequences of its actions; the Harm it causes. The gov't has not fulfilled any of the demands of a 'Democratic society' (from the Charter, Section 1). These people are monsters.

This is part of why the BC HRT accepted my complaint as something worthwhile to listen to. You should know the OSMV has fought me tooth and nail beginning with my original inquiry in 2002. The Discrimination complaint #1954 saw the OSMV state it would go to Court or public Hearing. I said ok. The OSMV then changed its mind and counsel, then hired Heenan Blaikie, 700 lawyers riding along on the laurels past Prime Ministers, and other high Liberals that brought the Constitution to Canada in 1982. Counsel then offered an out of court settlement. I accepted as I am accommodating and compromising. The settlement was broken. A phoney amendment was contrived through a charade, smokescreen, and fall guy. I caught them and the Attorney General at that time told me get a lawyer if I did not like how I was treated by his supervising lawyer. He buried the breach settlement agreement. He buried the fact that his supervising lawyer broke her Oath of Office by defending and covering up that the policy is illegal; Hunt should have attacked the illegal policy not me. Covering up the charade of misrepresentation about renewing the breached settlement agreement. I complained to the gov't and was told to get a lawyer if I want to further my inquiry as to why I was not included or informed the gov't was contriving an amendment to the broken settlement. The broken settlement was never re-written or amended. I thought the BC Law Society should know this about their colleagues. The Law Society did not answer my inquiry either and put a blanket closure on my complaint. Interesting stuff, eh.
The Law Society has yet to inform me what they are going to do to the lawyers that presented the stolen research articles and then lied about their actions. They won't say anything because the past AG is a lawyer and judge and what is the supervising lawyer for the AG doing not attacking an illegal gov't policy, presenting stolen research, and then lying about it.
All this exemplifies how corrupt the consequences of the policy are that this happens.
***

There are only Two Users Groups in a Universal Health Care System

When you listen to the government explain the demands upon the medical system they always blame the Public. You will never hear the gov't inform you of their demands, which are many. Think how many people you know that are forced to take medical exams for something and there is gov't involved; airlines, RCMP, cops, trains, Coast Guard, firemen and firewomen, divers, etc.
Reader, there are only Two User Groups using the universal medical system; the Public and the Government. The government never acknowledges their demands only the demands of the public. The gov't has now sanctioned private health care, or private enterprise, into the UHCS to rectify a problem they have created and not managed, the Emerge Overloads, long wait-times for surgery, and long doctor wait-times. And yet, the overloads are a direct result of the governments' unjustified demands upon diabetics and the disabled.
The government bases the policy upon the believed consequences of diabetes, not facts or science but a "view" of life but does not acknowledge the above consequences of their own actions. How is that for defining Discrimination. The OSMV takes no responsibility for what it is doing. Killers never do, do they.
This is why private practice has entered the UHCS, sanctioned to deal with the overcrowding created by the government.

My point is, the gov't is really not fighting this. Early Sept 2010
I had Xrays of my left hip, discomfort related to the nerve damage from my spinal problem that I resolved by paying for my own surgery. I had the choice to visit a same day, drop-in clinic in Nanaimo for this or go to Nanaimo hospital, as the Xray machines seem to be in satellite clinics again. There was one beside the hospital a few years ago so now they have popped up again. Why did it disappear a few years ago only to pop up in a setting that looks like a private enterprise?
Would you go to a Hospital or a clinic? Yes, I went to the drop-in clinic. In and out in an hour. There was not a line up of very sick people, people in need of MRI, Cat San, and Xrays, and their helpers or partners as mentioned above. Xrays in this setting paid for by the UHCS. So, why not the MRI?
Tomorrow, Friday Oct 7, I will have a MRI of my right knee. It is an eighteen month wait for the UHCS (18) for this. A year has gone by since I hurt my knee while working out, recuperating from the spinal operation and the muscle lethargy experienced due to the spinal problems and a year of laying down. I phoned Comox MRI, who are also online, on Wed as they then fax the Requisition Form to my doctor who fills it in and faxes it back, which then lets a Surgeon to review the MRI scans and be paid for his or her time. And for my doctor time to review the MRI and Surgeon's recommendations when I visit him to talk about this problem. This costs me $875 and I am not reimbursed for this. Why? If the doctors get paid for their time why doesn't the UHCS pay for the MRI? It paid for the Xrays and the reading of the Xrays in the drop in clinic.
Interesting stuff, eh.

The Doctors offering this new service medical care, private care, Cambie Surgery in Vancouver, (also online) are not the bad guys here. They fulfill a very real need that they did not construct. The government refuses to acknowledge its demands, the consequences, therefore lack of management, which leads to sanctioning of private practice to overcome the Overcrowding and long wait-times for surgery it has itself constructed.
Therefore, to save face, the gov't constructs the scapegoat, the public and its demands, as the reason for the intervention of private medical practice. That is right. It privatizes the health care system to diminish its own problem. It hides the unjustified demands and the consequences.
The public has not created the problem, the gov't has.

Lastly, it has come to my attention the government is putting forward the idea that Pharmacists should be able to renew a clients prescription, to increase or decrease the amount of a prescription drug on the clients demand, without the review of the attending doctor. This is being done to supposedly relieve the demands upon doctors.
Hold it. Hold it. The demands upon doctors are created by unjustified demands of government not by the public. If the gov't does not admit to its demands upon the UHCS, Emerge, doctors, etc, then they are not recognized, funded, and managed. This leads to the false scapegoat of the public as the over user again.
This shortage of doctor time leads to the contrived reasonable idea that the pharmacist should bypass a doctor visit and renew prescriptions, even if they do not have the results of my blood and urine tests? What kind of liability does this place upon the pharmacist? What kind of bullshit is this? Just more corruption from corrupt incompetent civil servants.
The government should admit to its demands upon the health care system before blaming the public again for the inordinate demands upon doctors and the mismanagement of the health care system which leads to the lie that pharmacists will resolve the UHCS problems of long wait-times to see a GP.
This is again the gov't blaming the Public for the woes of the UHCS where in reality they are the problem.
***

The Big Lie about Diabetes and Hypoglycemia

It is now June 2009, now Oct 2010, and the OSMV has still not offered any documents to justify the anti-diabetic policy, which I have been inquiring about since 2002. It has not proved a need for the policy, that the DME can do anything, acknowledged the consequences, or proved any Good or any of the above facts.
Reader, you are not informed that low blood sugar and its consequences is not diabetic dependent. It explains Road Rage. How do you explain your friends Road Rage? Non-diabetics also experience hypoglycemia. How do you feel when working out to much or are not eating? So, you drink Gator Aide or some other Carbohydrate drink. How do you feel when you eat those weight loss pills? They really are just some kind of speed or meth. They burn Carbs so you loose weight.
What other medication or street drug speeds you up? Not pot as it makes you hungry, therefore an increase of Carbs.
Kids are the best example; what happens to kids when they are not feed? Hyper or speedy. Get sick and don't eat? Get stressed out and grumpy. As you do. Yes, they become hypoglycemic, low blood sugar and light headed or have interesting behaviour to say the least. You give them a sweet or Carb don't you. They calm down almost immediately.
What happens to you when you drink too much alcohol? You get drunk but also hypoglycemic as the booze inhibits your liver from producing Carbs, so use up the Carbs in your blood and become hypoglycemic because you didn't eat after work and had a light lunch. Then you drive home and kill someone and are charged with drunk driving and no one knows you are hypoglycemic as this term is only for those dirty needle using, fat, obese diabetics. Now add your weight loss pills on top of the booze and you are indeed a monster in a car. Hypoglycemia by itself can make a person seem intoxicated like the consequences of booze and drugs. It can also make your breath seem as if you have had a drink of alcohol. Dr. Atkins diet, the low carb diet, has this effect upon you. That is why he tells people time after time to only stay on the diet for two weeks only and then add carbs but people do not do this. And they wonder why they have problems. It's self induced hypoglycemia.
What else do you do that makes you become light headed? How do you remedy the problem?

Reader, just remember, the Harm from a driver mishap involving a diabetic driver is an Accidental harm, even if they were at fault. Is diabetes really responsible for the accident or was a diabetic just involved. No one responds to these questions.
The Harm you experience from the harm of the unjustified medical policy is a Conscious, Deliberate or Intentional harm, as the government has known about this change to the availability of medical care since 2002 when I began my inquiry.
Someone has made the decision that the harm caused by the policy is less harm than the diabetic driver may cause; that is why it is a intentional harm, which is very different than an accidental harm.
Intentional harm is ok compared to accidental harm or supposed accidental harm. It isn't. What if you child dies in emerge? It's Democide.
If a diabetic has numerous driver mishaps their license is taken away just as it would be for any person having multiple driver mishaps. If this is applied to the diabetic then why isn't this same treatment applied to the corrupt civil servants applying this illegal policy? How many accidental mishaps are the corrupt civil servants and their illegal policy allowed to be involved in before it is killing, Homicide? Maiming? Endangerment of life as happened to me before someone else takes them to task? It is Homicide and then Democide.
***

Go to these web pages if you really want to learn how wrong the policy and anti-diabetic lobby really is.

PubMed. Diabetes Care. Cox et al. 2003. “Diabetes and Driver Mishaps; Frequency and correlations from a multinational survey.”
PubMed. Harsch IA, et al. 2002. “Traffic hypoglycemias and accidents in patients with diabetes mellitus treated with different antidiabetic regimes.”

These two research articles really have deconstructed the anti-diabetic mindset and how discriminatory it really is.
These two articles reinforced my understanding that there is no problem with type 2 diabetic drivers, whether commercial or private, therefore my inquiry through 2002-2004. This is also why the OSMV has not offered any science to justify the policy.
Actually, within my new Human Rights Complaint, #5791, the OSMV put forward 185 “References”, Scientific articles to supposedly justify the policy. Done within a Early Dismiss Application, where the public is not witness. Through the back door so you would not see. Slippery and slimy eh. Well it is Democide so anything goes.
Reader, No Permission Forms were given for Copyright, or Intellectual Property Rights, or Intent of Use. The Cox article, from above, states never use the study against diabetics, ever. Why has it been used?
Secondly, the academic researcher that offered the scientific documents had her presentation stamped by a Lawyer, under the title of an Affidavit. This mean that the presentation is legal, honest, and complete? That it has a completeness to it. Then where are the Permission Forms? Isn't a Lawyer and Lawyer's Affidavit used as a tool of Power? Affidavits are used as someone if someone has sworn an Oath. But then the civil servants have broken their Oath of Office by running an illegal policy and covering up its consequences. So, once done the second time is easy.
Also, at the bottom of each “References” page there is a stamp, “For internal distribution only”. Why does the academic researcher protect herself with this stamp? Because she knows of Copyright, Intellectual Property Rights, and Intent of Use laws. She knows Permission Forms are needed and she doesn't have any.
Hold it. Hold it. If she knows this then why has presented the “References” in a Human Rights Discrimination Complaint if she is not allowed to do so? Is it because she is now employed by the gov't and under the umbrella of the Attorney General's Office and the prestigious law firm Heenan Blaikie and beyond Laws? And thinks these instruments of protection do not apply to her now she is civil servant? Bullshit. She is corrupt. She is a thief and liar and has joined the others in their cover up of the illegal policy and its killing.
Why hasn't the OSMV presented any Permission Forms? It protects all its material with Copyright, Intellectual Property Rights, and Intent of Use.
Why did the lawyer from Heenan Blaikie, via Harvard Law School, not offer any Permission Forms? Her company handles Trademarks and all their protective instruments such as Copyright, Intellectual Property Rights, and Intent of Use.
Lastly, the diabetic liability has been created by government and the anti-diabetic lobbyists' prejudice, bias, fear and loathing, disgust, and contempt for the diabetic and Law. This defines absolute corruption. And done in Canada.
How else do they explain the lack of duty, obligation, legal responsibility to legally justify the demands of the Charter, HR Code, the Motor Vehicle Act? And how do they explain the complete failure to fulfill their Oath of Office; to Obey the Law, do not steal, lie, misrepresent, mislead, maim, endanger life, and kill?
How else do they explain the harm caused by the demand upon the medical system and its clients?
Who is the real problem, who is the real liability here? Who's hiding what they are really doing?

Remember this policy the next time you need to wait 5-7 days for a doctor, the next time you are stacked in an overcrowded Emergency facility and you know 50% of the clients should not be there, the next time you ride around in an ambulance because you cannot access a doctor or access the Emerge.
Remember this policy the next time you are sitting in an Emerge, holding your head, and wondering why your loved one just died and the doctors are explaining that the unexpected and unexplained death is due to the overcrowding as the unfathomable reason for the death.
***

The Truth about Hypoglycemia and Diabetic Drivers

Reader, the corruption of the diabetic begins with the misrepresentation of the influence of the diabetic driver.
The Insurance Corporation of British Columbia, ICBC, its data 2005; approx 75% of population is licensed , therefore the presentation from the gov't and anti-diabetic lobby is not true. They have presented the influence of the diabetic as seen through All society, but in the real world of Driving it is only 75% of society. The 25% is not a mistake. It is too large to be a mistake. It is done deliberately to denigrate the diabetic, to create a scope of negative influence that is not there. If you padded your Scientific research or results by 25% you would be disgraced by the Scientific community. There would be legal action. If you own or manage a business and mislead by 25% you will loose your business or be fired. Why do I need to accept this just because I am Diabetic and labeled Disabled? So, above I have used all drivers and diabetics as this is what the gov't puts forward to corrupt your understanding of what is reality. So, if they put this forward I decided to use the numbers they have put forward to expose how corrupt they are. Their high numbers come back to them as they increase their harm. They have mislead you and lied to you and it has come back to them with the high numbers of doctor abuse etc.
Reader, as most diabetics are over the age of sixteen I have all diabetics as drivers. Although, not all diabetics of age are drivers, which means the whole presentation is again less than what is presented by gov't and the anti-diabetic lobby.
However, this corruption and killing is so great that a few less or more diabetic drivers really does not impact the results.
If only 75% of society is driving, 2005 data, and only approximately 4.25 – 4.75%, 2005 data, of that is type 2, then we have 75 people x 0.0425 = 3.1875 type 2s or 75 people x 0.0475 = 3.5625 type 2s that may be driving. So, 3.1875 is 3 people, but it is less because not all diabetics are driving due to the stigmatization associated with diabetes or just don't drive. So, what do we really have? Less than 3 to be sure, but maybe closer to 2 diabetics in 75 drivers. Not the 4.25 or 4.75 as the gov't states. This is about Driving not social numbers. Or 2 for 75 or 2.6 diabetics for 100 people. Yes it is stale or tiring but one needs to know the OSMV and its followers care nothing for the truth and this is just another example of the misinformation or lies about diabetes.
Diabetes is supposed to be 9% now so whether we use 380 or 400 000 diabetics the impact is huge and negative. These corrupt civil servants still use 30 or more GPs for their illegal policy, their bias, hate, prejudice, fear and loathing, contempt, and disgust of the diabetic. They are not ignorant as this has been going on for years and now they steal documents and lie about it.

Now it gets really interesting with the Truth about Low Blood Sugar, hypoglycemia.

Reader, the policy is based upon hypoglycemia and it consequences, which supposedly comes from drug intervention to lower high blood sugar levels; high blood sugar defines Diabetes. So, in the real world only those few that take certain drugs may experience hypoglycemia, during everyday life or while driving. The OSMV and the anti-diabetic does not inform that most type 2s manage their diabetes without medication, therefore they are not problematic. Think about that fact and what you are lead to believe by gov't.
It is said that 90% of type 2s manage their diabetes without medication. Even if it is only 75%, the number of type 2 diabetic drivers is really insignificant.
If 75% of type 2s do not use medication then we are left with, 3.1875 type 2s x 0.75 = 2.390, which leads us to,
3.1875 - 2.390 = 0.797 of a person, that uses medication to manage their type 2 diabetes, out of 75 people.( (3.1875 from 3 paragraphs above)

If 90% of type 2s, this is the real number, do not use medication then we are left with, 3.1875 type 2s x 0.90 = 2.869, which leads us to, 3.1875 – 2.869 = 0.319 of a person, that uses medication to manage their type 2 diabetes, out of 75 people.
My point is, the numbers are insignificant and this is what the OSMV and others consciously do not inform of.

Lastly, the medication of choice for type 2 is Metformin, a non-hypoglycemic causing drug and its relatives.
It is said that most or 90% of type 2s using medication use Metformin or similar drugs. This means that we need to decrease the numbers again. The 0.797 or 0.319 % of a person by 90%. You do the numbers this time. Or, do you really need to do them in order to understand why the OSMV and the anti-diabetic lobby does not inform you of such facts? O how insignificant the risk of hypoglycemia really is.
Remember, these numbers are beyond insignificant. Why is this being done to the diabetic? The public? The Health Care System? Doctors? And remember, I visit the GP 20 times for health care, which is not acknowledged.

Reader, it must be remembered that when I became diabetic, 1999, it was said that diabetes influenced about 5% of society; type 2s were about 4.25% to 4.75% of society with type 1 being 0.25% to 0.75% of society. As the ICBC data is from 2005 I have stayed with the numbers of that time. If it is 9% today then we only need to double things up for our needs here to get a reasonable idea of what the consequences really are.

This means that the type 2 driver, that may be a hypoglycemic problem, is still something that is really insignificant. Don't forget, from this insignificant number not all that use medications will experience hypoglycemia, or hypoglycemia within a driving situation, and that situation may not be problematic. Why is this fact not acknowledged by the OSMV?
Diabetics are never presented as managing a hypoglycemic episode; episodes like being hungry, or grumpy like non-diabetics if working too hard, not eating, new circumstances, legal medications and illegal drugs, or brought on because they are working for the people I am confronting, corrupt people who they need to work for, which causes undo stress which can be a fact in low blood sugar. Imagine the stress working for such monsters if you really need the job; say anything and you will be transferred to the Ice Flows at the North Pole. Ice melts you know.
The OSMV nor the anti-diabetic lobby present the numbers just given. You are always given the 5%, or 9% today, of society is diabetic, therefore the numbers seems large and the diabetic problematic, and needs to be managed even if the science does not support the policy, even if it is illegal, even though the policy kills. All of which has just been debunked.
In fact, these corrupt civil servants present the diabetic as so great a problem, the demands of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, the Human Rights Code, and the Motor Vehicle Act are all put aside as is their Oath of Office to follow the Law, do not kill, do not lie, steal, mislead, and misrepresent, etc.
These instruments of democracy are never mention by the OMSV and the anti-diabetic lobby. Why?
Why has the HRT not mentioned these instruments of Canada's Democratic society as not being fulfilled?

I have yet to receive a New Policy and it was promised in 2006 then 2007. The OSMV should have had a legal policy since the signing of the Charter, in 1982, or since the amendments to the MVA in 1996, or since the Canadian Human Rights Act in 1978. It has offered nothing. I should have had an Original Policy to compare the first Draft that I reviewed. Nothing was offered therefore I criticized the Draft and the corruption within it.
Again, in 2008 the OSMV presented 185 Scientific References to justify its behaviour. However, they forgot to get Permission from the owners of the material and just slid the research in through the back door, where the public and owners of the research would not notice and the gov't lawyers and private lawyers they hired would use their position of status, trust, power, and prestige to misrepresent what they were doing. Now you know. How corrupt do you think this OSMV driving policy really is? How many people do you think they have killed, maimed, and endangered lives such as mine?
***

Added May 20, 2009
Impact upon Funding of Medical Care and Medical Operations

I had two spinal surgeries in my early twenties. I have had thirty five years of productive life. I am a great Capitalist, Democrat, and knowledgeable Consumer all because I was able to have spinal surgery. Something went wrong, something unbearably wrong three months ago. I was having back problems again, the past six or eight months, left sciatic again, just another one of those “bad times that I have from the old back problems.” The other night I woke up because it felt as if someone had plugged me into 110 volts. It is not a nice experience, whether in bed or on the job. X-rays were done. Nothing discovered. MRI ordered. It took twenty four days for the Nanaimo Hospital to send me a letter informing me I would need to wait four months for the MRI; I live in Nanaimo. The demand for the MRI was faxed to the hospital the day it was ordered from the GP. I asked for an explanation of why it took so long. No acknowledgment of the request was given.
This is my spine. The thing that runs us. I was told of a clinic that offers the MRI privately, Comox MRI. I phoned on a Friday, they are so busy that I had to wait until the morning of the following Friday. Still the appointment was made then and there. The clerical worker just put me on the list, no big deal, the appointment book was open; she was working.
It was done Friday, the Radiologist, at the Courtney hospital reviewed the MRI on a Sunday and mailed the report to me, received Tues for the visit to the GP on Wed. I also got a copy of MRI, my own CD. Surgeons opinions were requested. So, the GP that I visit requested the opinion. It is a year plus wait to visit a surgeon in Victoria for the consult and if the surgeon believed there should be intervention it would another year plus for this. A two year plus wait, plus the four month wait for the MRI. This is for my spine. I do not need to accept the corruption surrounding this. I am not going to be a cripple, disabled, roadkill for these corrupt civil servants using my taxes for a fraudulent DME that does nothing. I was not going to become a drug addict from using opiates for two years waiting for bona fide and a medical necessary operation. No these civil servants are monsters and are killing, maiming, and endangering lives with their policy of hate, bias, prejudice, fear and loathing, disgust, and contempt of the diabetic and disabled.

The gov't only does 'so many' spinal operations a year. This is not because there are not the staff or facilities to do operations. It is an arbitrary decision to not fund such operations upon request. The surgeons and their teams are there waiting.
I was told about the Cambie Surgery Clinic by a medical employee. I phoned. We made an appointment for a consult. This was done three days after the MRI and I was operated eight days after that. All done and home within two weeks of phoning Comox MRI.
The doctor that operated is the Chief of Surgery for Lions Gate Hospital, North Vancouver, and a neurosurgeon.
The operation was done Friday morning. Not in the dead of night after the surgeon and his team have worked all day at the hospital. The operating rooms in the hospitals are not being used due to lack of funding. The surgeons and their teams are not being used. All because of the gov't arbitrary decisions concerning funding.
Reader, how is it that the OSMV can demand taxes, about $30-35 000 000 to pay for the illegal DME which offer no good and not fund spinal surgeries?

My point is, don't forget, the above fraudulently used taxes are only for the diabetic DME. What is the total amount when the other 100 or so other medical conditions that are monitored by the OSMV? 50-60-70 000 000? For what? And are these people also seeing a doctor for their medical condition and prescriptions?
Yes, these civil servants are real monsters.

How much pain and suffering am I supposed to endure for two years because of the wait-times?
How far will my body degenerate due to the two year wait, as for all sense and purpose I am immobile?
How long will it take my body to repair considering I will be two years older and experienced the two year wait?
How much damage to the nerves will happen due to the problem I am now experiencing? I've been informed that time will damage the nerves and that is why I was experiencing such strong muscle spasms.
I was told that if the muscle spasms moved to the front of my body as they were, if they became stronger I was in jeopardy of loosing the control of my lower bowels. How long would I have to live after being on bags for my urine and stool?
The people doing this to me, restricting needed operations, for their illegal policy are really taking care of societies health?
***

Lets make connections to the false demands of the OSMV.

Again, we must look at the Numbers and Consequences concerning the Diabetic Policy

4.2 million people in BC. The gov't states that about 9% of society is diabetic.
That means 4 200 000 x 0.09 = 378 000 diabetics. Most are over the age of driving, so lets just say, for ease, that all are drivers.
From above there is the five year cycle of the forced diabetic drivers' medical examination, DME. At diagnosis, then years end, and again at year five; for private license. There are so few type 1 and commercial drivers that we really do not need to worry about their influence of every year or every two years. Not for here anyways.
Again, we have 378 000 / 5 year cycle = 75 600 diabetic drivers are forced to endure the DME every year.
75 600 x $75.00 for the DME = $5 670 000. The DME fee is paid for by the Medical Services Plan, which is under the UHCS umbrella, to doctors for their services, which is then reimbursed to the MSP by the Solicitor General's tax budget, as it manages the OSMV and its demands.
As stated above, this is done to present the DME as being married to the MSP, therefore giving the DME false legality or bona fide (ness) through association with a bona fide medical organization. (This is just another charade played out by the OSMV, other corrupt civil servants, and the anti-diabetic lobby in order to supposedly justify the policy and its consequences, therefore their harms.)

Reader, the GP that I visit for the DME only charged me half of the clinics posted charge for the DME. That is right. That's a very good example of civil disobedience isn't it. Don't forget doctors are legislated to perform the DME, so not charging is really stating the doctor does not support the unjustified medical exam he is forced to endure. This is where the $75 comes from, it is not just some arbitrary number pulled out of the air. It really is penalizing the doctors for doing such a thing as actually practicing civil disobedience against gov't policy. The vindictiveness and pettiness is just great isn't it.
Also, my Human Rights Discrimination complaint saw the reimbursement of those charges, but only to me, not all other diabetic drivers or disabled drivers, #1954. When I discovered this I lodged a Representative Discrimination Complaint with the HRT as the OSMV would not acknowledge my correspondence concerning this matter, #5699. The HRT decided I had not met the six month timeline for lodging complaints; remember the Settlement Agreement was broken so no date is established as a beginning date or date when the discrimination began or was understood to have taken place; this fact was presented to the HRT but it did not acknowledge this fact when deciding I had not met the six month timeline date. Interesting fact, eh.
The discrimination complaint was not accepted not because it did not have merit or value, only that I did not discover the discrimination with a reasonable timeline according to the HRT, but a beginning date for the six month timeline was not established by the HRT. The procrastination or stonewalling about this matter won the day for the OSMV, not merit or value on its part. But corruption again.
***

Core Services Review Corruption
Discrimination and a New Consequence of the Policy

If you now divide the $5 670 000 paid out yearly by the OSMV for the illegal DME by the $10 000 for the spinal surgery I had, ($8 570 for the surgery and overnight care, private consult at $750, and private MRI at $875, we have just over $10 195) we have $5 670 000 / $10 000 = 567 spinal operations.
That's right. 567 spinal operations can be done for the cost of the DME done each year.
Reader, the list for spinal operations was about 750 and the wait time is two years plus. I was forced Not to accept this. I am not going to be a martyr for the corruption surrounding this policy or cripple myself for these corrupt civil servants.
This means I could have had my UHCS spinal operation within a reasonable time if the OSMV was not making unjustified and illegal demands upon the UHCS and our tax dollars. The funds are there. The surgeons and their teams are there.
The funding is not there because the OSMV makes unjustified demands upon the UHCS hat are illegal. The indifference in gov't, the Ministry of Health, to not challenge this demand is wrong. All demands upon the UHCS are evaluated so who in the Min of Health are supporting the monsters in the gov't car industry? The OSMV is just more car industry sickness that is twisted beyond understanding.
The Ministry of Health allows unjustified demands of other ministries but refuses my demand for a bona fide, reasonably justified, medically necessary spinal operation? It also refuses to confront the OSMV about its unjustified demand that offers no Good for me or society and yet an operation for me and society is Good and worthwhile, it has value and merit.
Lastly, when Assistant Deputy Minister Gary Martin in the Ministry of Public Safety and Solicitor General, wrote about the policy, March 22, 2004 that “Most importantly, it saves lives.” he lied. It is just another lie as I asked for the proof of his perverted statement and he offered nothing. He just hid.
In that letter he also stated;
“...all government programs, including those which are the responsibility of the Superintendent, were subject to a Core Services Review to determine whether they were appropriately delivered by government and affordable. It was determined that the medical review program was appropriately part of government's core services. Most importantly, it saves lives.”.

So, we are lead to believe these civil servants worked through The Five Steps of Engagement because that is their job? That they know they are putting out $6 000 000 a year for an illegal diabetic policy? That they know about the consequences of the policy that impacts surgeries? That they are making a demand upon the UHCS that offers no Good? That this demand changes the availability of GPs? Causes Emerge Overcrowding? They know all this and continue with the policy. They know all this and continue with the policy because they are hidden.
These people are Nazis as they are trying to solve the woes of society upon the diabetic and disabled, putting their personal demands before the health of people needing bona fide, medically necessary surgeries. Because they know they are doing all this and continue on. Let them stand before jury and explain themselves.
Who are these people? How have they hidden themselves from taking responsibility for their actions? Who's hiding them?
How many have they killed. How many maimed? How many harmed due to the two year wait-time for surgery, both physically damage coming from the needed surgery and the use of years of opiate use?

They know they are sanctioning the use of millions of tax dollars for the other 100 or so medical conditions the OSMV supposedly manages with medical examinations that can not do what they are alleged to be able to do. That they know the consequences of the policy kill, maim, and endanger lives such as happened with me? They know this and continue on with the policy? They are involved in Homicide; death due to indifference to human life; death due to reckless endangerment to human life.
This makes them murders and what else? Who are these people? And you wonder why the Supervising lawyer for the Attorney General's Office presented stolen research in an effort to legally justify the policy and played a charade to cover up the broken Settlement Agreement. And why the BC HRT did not acknowledge this theft and then the lie about it. And why the BC HRT changed the scope of my complaint so that I now need to wait until the OSMV produces a Policy Paper about All disabilities they supposedly manage. This Policy Paper will never be put forward as they now know I will demand Permission Forms and that Science does not support the type 2 diabetic policy and I already visit a doctor at a rate of 20 top 1.
This is why this is Democide; the killing of large numbers of the public by gov't policy. This is also an illegal gov't policy.

Again, the above is just for diabetes. Again, the OSMV monitors one hundred medical conditions. What is the real cost to the UHCS and our taxes due to this policy? $50 or 75 million, yearly? If our taxes can be used for the illegal policy and phoney medical examination there are funds available for bona fide medical needs within the UHCS.
If the diabetic policy has never been justified or proved to offer any Good why should we believe the OSMV has justified the other conditions it supposedly manages for our health that the Core Services supports? We can not afford to believe anything they say. And with the presentation of the stolen research we now know the managers of the OSMV are thieves and liars, their policy also kills and has endangered my life.
***

The Numbers of the Killing and Slaughter

What really happens in Emerge. You go there or are taken there because you may die due to your condition, it's life and death stuff. The emerge doctors work with death every day. It is the nature of the Place. It is not your Place as a reporter, or politician ,or what ever you do. It is a really different Place to work.
Don't give me any crap about how you report death or see a death or been involved in a death. This is only an effort of denial, trying to belittle what is happening, the emerge is about life and death, 24/7. It is not the same world that you and I live in. You go there because you think you may be dying or be suffering from something that is unimaginably wrong.

My point is, doctors have a knowledge of how many deaths happen in their job place. They know the everyday occurrences of death and the legal need to explain them. They record the deaths and causes. The documents are there to see how many are listed as unexpected, unexplained only through Overcrowding.
So, how many deaths are happening to force doctors to call Press Conferences about the high number of deaths, the unexpected and unexplained deaths, the unnecessary death only explained through Overcrowding?
What if the standard number of explained deaths are one a day, that's seven a week, or 365 deaths a year.
Do you really believe only one person a day dies in emerge? Multiply that by the busiest 10 hospitals?
So, if one or two or three deaths is the standard for everyday occurrences how many unexpected, unexplained and unnecessary deaths have driven doctors to jump up and down screaming 'I can't stand it anymore' and call Press Conferences? 365 deaths in one hospital x 10 = 3650 a year x 10 yrs I've been making inquiries about this is 36 500 people just for Overcrowding. That's more than the Genocide in old Yugoslavia. Even if it is only one every four days we still come to approximately 9 000 people. This is very close to the Bosnia Genocide by Serbs.
Reader, do you really think these doctors are doing this for one unexplained death a month? A week? A day?
I use the 10 largest or 10 busiest hospitals to make my point, as not all hospitals will experience the overcrowding like large city hospitals; which in BC we do have ten.
Lions Gate, St. Paul's, Van General, Richmond, Burnaby, New Westminster, Surrey, two in Victoria, Nanaimo, Prince George, Kamloops, or Kelowna. All large hospitals. Take ten.

Unexplained deaths in one busy Hospital

1 per day = 365 a year (this would be a reason for a Press Conference)
1 per week = 52 a year (this could be a good reason, but would shift work, over crowding, number of staff, and other people involved allow this to surface?
1 per month = 12 a year (would this be noticed?)

2 per day = 730 a year (this would get the doctors attention?)
2 per week = 104 a year (maybe)
2 per month = 24 a year (is this noticable?)

3 per day = 1095 a year (would catch someone's. Is this what is really going on in
the large busy hospitals such as VGH,Burnaby, New Westminster, St. Paul's, Lions Gate,Surrey?)
3 per week = 156 a year (would this be noticed? Hopefully.
3 per month = 36 a year (would they be lost in the overcrowding, etc?)

What really defines how many unexplained deaths are driving doctors to call the Press and make the killing public?
One a day? Two a day? Would these deaths be noticed during the shift work that is experienced by Emerge doctors and staff? The deaths begin to roll over into the next shift and the next shift, 12 hr shifts for three or four days at a time, then a new shift of people at night and for the end of the week.
Wouldn't the Folders for Deaths and Unexplained Deaths begin to fill up? Where is the Coroner's Office in all this?
Reader, we could have 365 or 730 unexplained deaths in one hospital and that is why these doctors are freaking out and screaming I can't stand it anymore. This is for one hospital only.
Deaths in the Afghan War, the 147th was June 7, 2010

In BC there are a hundred or so hospitals but only a few that are large and experiencing the overcrowding. I may be wrong, maybe small hospitals experience the same so the unexpected death rate is increased again.
What about only one death per two days.
We now have 182 deaths x 10 hospitals = 1820 unexplained deaths. (one every other day)
We now have 365 deaths x 10 hospitals = 3650 unexplained deaths. (one a day)
We now have 730 deaths x 10 hospitals = 7300 unexplained deaths. (two a day)
And this is for only one year. I began my inquiry in 2002 and those doing this to society didn't even put the policy on hold.
At 1 every 2 days it is 1820 for 10 hospitals x the 10 years I've been inquiring = 18 200. This is 6 000 more than the killing in Bosnia.
And you wonder why doctors are screaming foul.

And you wonder why the OSMV changed the wording to the Motor Vehicle Act, in my first Human Rights Discrimination Complaint, to deceive the reader into believing it has the right to just do what it wants, broke the settlement agreement and would not renew it, have not produced a Policy, and have stolen scientific research,(corrupting science to justify their perverted wants just like the German Nazis did), all done to justify their illegal policy and its killing.
Why a senior civil servant wrote the policy saves lives. This means the diabetic is a killer. Part of corrupt people and killers defending themselves from their crimes is to incriminate someone else, turn them into the Other, the Pariah. You wonder why gov't labels me as the killer. Just another part of the charade of defense. Just as the Deputy OSMV blamed the low level civil servant for the breached settlement agreement, and then the HRT for the wrong scope of complaint, they just Blame the other guy, blame the diabetic, blame the disabled for societies woes and will do whatever to bury the consequences of their illegal behaviour.

Lastly, 9/11 killed 2974 innocent persons and the world went to War. Think about that.
And the killing the doctors are reporting is only for BC. Is this a new kind of Genocide. A Crime Against Humanity? Actually it is defined as Democide. (Wikipedia)
***

Conclusion

Reader, no one can afford to be Indifferent to the above behaviour. What will they do to me next? My disability is already on my license. That's ok. It's important for accidents and health care.
However, the policy contributes to ill health; turns me into a pariah and wastes tax funds needed for bona fide health care.
I have challenged these people for the truth and facts only to be treated as above.

My first encounter with the OSMV led me to discover there was no policy or legal justification of the policy concerning diabetic drivers. The Charter was not fulfilled, the HR Code was not fulfilled, and the Motor Vehicle Act demands were not fulfilled. Reader, don't forget the diabetic drivers' policy never been proved as needed.

The second encounter was within the first HR complaint, which saw the OSMV counsel paraphrase three statutes of the Motor Vehicle Act in order to justify the policy. However, counsel left out the most important words within the statutes, therefore one would believe the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles has Carte Blanche to do what he or she wants to do. In reality, it is the very opposite. Those that crafted the MVA did so in order to protect society for the authoritarians, those with ignorance, bias, prejudice, bigotry, and fear and loathing with no morals or ethics like the people I have encountered. The paraphrasing was so different from what I had read in MVA that I went back to the Licensing Office to make sure I had the correct MVA.
One mistake by me is acceptable and I will be challenged for it. One mistake from a lawyer paraphrasing a statute is not ok. It is never acceptable. It was deliberate. Three mistakes is absolute corruption. I believe she came from the Attorney Generals' office, which supposedly takes care of the public need. Was Hunt, the Supervising Counsel for Human Rights at this time, directing this lawyer to do this falsifying of a legal document? A senior lawyer needed to ok this lawyers official OSMV Response to my Discrimination Complaint.
This allowed me to understand how far the OSMV would go to protect itself. One only presses on as they are the corrupt people not me. Things only worsened, the OSMV broke the Settlement Agreement. A low level civil servant was blamed. Howie, the Deputy Superintendent, responsible for this policy and settlement agreement, should have been fired for such irresponsible behaviour. She should have been fired for running an illegal policy to begin with. There was a charade played out in order to pretend the breach was renewed. Hunt, was involved in the Phoney amendment to the breached settlement agreement as was their counsel from Heenan Blaikie who presented the settlement agreement. No one has explained to me why I was not involved in the amendment to the breach that was never offered but only played as if it was. That is why I call it the phoney amendment. I complained to the Attorney General's office about Hunt and her charade and unwillingness to renew the settlement agreement and was told to get a lawyer if I didn't like what was done to me. This guy went on to harass the Mormons living in the East Kootneys, which led to nothing. They may be marrying under age girls and abusing them but I didn't read anything about killing, maiming, or endangerment of life or fraudulent use of tax dollars. Why didn't he investigate his own office for breach of Oath of Office just to begin with, running an illegal policy.

The third encounter saw the corruption surrounding the Representative Discrimination Complaint, #5699, mentioned above, written up online by the HRT, 2008, and again with the two Reviews at my blog site.

The fourth encounter, saw the OSMV, who hired Heenan Blaikie again, present 174 References, Scientific Journal Articles, used without Permission Forms for Copyright, Intellectual Property Rights, and Intent of Use, plus 15 or so on Thyroid. They were slipped in the through the back door of a Human Rights Complaint that was being heard outside of a Public HRT Hearing. No Public or Press. Only written presentations were presented for a HRT member to read and make a decision.
I have complained about the above but it seems no consequences or investigation has occurred. No penalties coming from such actions and look to where they have progressed to. No Policy and the killing continues.
The BC Human Rights Tribunal didn't have the grit or guts or professionalism to challenge the OSMV and its counsel as to why they presented stolen research. Why? Because the lawyer presenting the stolen research is a former HRT employee? I would expose corruption within the Attorney General's Office? The Solicitor General's Office?
Why? Because the HRT knows the policy is illegal and the consequences are Democide?
Reader, don't forget, I have not done anything to anyone except ask gov't what it is doing and why. So, the next time you have a loved one die in Emerge or cannot get health care within a reasonable time, and the Emerge staff cannot explain the overcrowding and lack of care just remember the above.

Lastly, Gary Martin, from above, wrote this of the diabetic drivers policy, “Most importantly, it saves lives.”
This means that diabetic drivers are killing people. This means the policy decreases that killing.
No documents were or have been offered to justify that diabetics are killers.
No documents were or have been offered to justify the policy decreases that killing.
I complained to his manager.

Tony Heemskerk, A/Deputy Solicitor General, Ministry of Public Safety & Solicitor General, May 14, 2004, wrote this about Martin's letter and pronouncements, “...am satisfied that his letter was appropriate.”

It is not appropriate nor true. They are both liars, corrupt, and irresponsible. How many people have they helped kill with their unjustified support for this policy?

These statements have not been proved nor retracted. I am left, as the public is, to understand that diabetics are killers as these senior civil servants have written this in the public space. They have not proved the statements are true and yet pronounce and support this as government policy. We, non-Nazis Canadians, non-Nazis civil servants can prove the policy kills. Just ask an Emerge doctor. Just ask the survivors of Emerge deaths and surgery wait-time deaths. The records are there for all to review.
These lies from these two is is an excellent example of what I am fighting against; disinformation, misinformation, lies, and harm from corrupt government civil servants. These people do not fight to make Canada a Better Place. They who do not fight for Equality in Canada. A Just society. To fight for things that are Right. These two men have declared their bias, prejudice, hate, ignorance, fear and loathing, disgust, and contempt for the diabetic, the disabled, the Law, and their Oath of Office. Both of these men should have been fired. They are monsters. Just two of the monsters involved in this illegal policy and its horrific consequences.
Again, one death is an accident, two and the policy should have been put on hold, and the third is Homicide; death through indifference to human life or reckless endangerment to human life causing death. The fourth death is what? Serial killer? The fifth is Mass Murder. The next lead us to Genocide, Democide. They know their policy kills.

If these people will write such a horrific statement and not prove it, then what does this say about all else put forward by the OSMV and the anti-diabetic lobby about the diabetic? What does this say about the other un-known civil servants involved in this policy and its cover-up?

My point is, let's just insert something new for diabetic; lets use Color, or Culture, or Religion, or new immigrant, or French Canadian, or First Nation person.
***

Classified, Labeled, Given a Number, and Forced to Endure a Phoney Medical Examination

Reader, I am Classified, Labeled, Given a Number, Forced to undergo a phoney medical examination, lies told about me, laws broken to get at me, settlement agreement broken, charades played to cover it up, science stolen, used out of context and used even when a do not use declaration is there, and will be tracked for the rest of my life.
Canada's demands of the Charter, the Human Rights Code, and the Motor Vehicle Act have not been fulfilled and the statutes of the MVA were altered in an effort to falsely justify the OSMV actions concerning this policy.
Additionally, All of these civil servants have broken their Oath of Office, which demands they obey the Law, do not Kill, Steal, Lie, Mislead, Misinform, etc.
These people are the Fascists and Nazis within our civil service and society.

Next step, will they want me to wear a nice little badge for all to see?
Where are these kinds of people really going with this?
How many people are they going to kill, maime, and endanger lives with their illegal policy?
***

February 2010 Update

Another 'just realized' consequence of the Policy that needs to be investigated. “Oath of Office”.

The following is from a letter sent to Superintendent Graham Burnside, Director, Federal Enforcement Branch, RCMP, 1200 Vanier Parkway, Ottawa, ON, K1A 0R2 February 23, 2010.
The RCMP has not responded to my complaints nor given me a Case Number that I can refer anyone to. Why?

Dear Superintendent Burnside;

In my letter to Williams, Layton, the Unknown woman, others, and you, February 15, 2010, I mention Oath of Office, section Vancouver Sun, p 3.
Another 'just realized' consequence of the Policy that needs to be investigated.
If I am correct you swear an Oath of Office; 'To do no Harm' and 'To Obey the Law'. As I have done for employment, a “Code of Ethics”. You breach it and you are fired, simple. CBC NEWS, Saturday morning Feb 19 just stated an RCMP officer is charged with stealing and others on leave for breach of code of ethics.
The RCMP actions concerning these RCMP civil servants, because that is what you really are, demands the RCMP to investigate my complaint of the civil servants involved in my Inquiry of the diabetic policy. Your counsel cannot reject this request. What is Good enough for you is Good enough for you to Investigate those civil servants that are running an illegal Policy and knowing the horrific Harm of the Policy, and have continued on with the policy knowing the consequences of their actions.

Superintendent, if you believe something is wrong, in your personal “view” something is wrong, lets say gangsters, and you instigate your own policy against those people and you kill or maim naïve bystanders such as myself or Williams or Layton or the Unknown woman, you would be dismissed and charged accordingly. Don't forget the diabetic driver's policy is based upon some civil servants “view” of the world, not the Law.
First of all you do not have a “view”. You have the Law to Obey, no matter what you think, as do the senior civil servants that are doing this to me and the naïve bystanders that are killed and maimed by the policy.
Second, you do not have the Right to Harm. You do not have the Right to balance off a gangster Harm with a Harm. In this case a believed a fictitious diabetic drivers Accidental Harm compared to a very real Concrete Constructed Harm.
This makes the policy and the consequences absolutely horrific, worse than the gangster harm, as the policy and its consequences are a Constructed Harm contrived to intervene in a Fictitious Accidental Harm, where gangster harm really is there.
The policy is Not based upon Law, therefore it is based upon bias, prejudice, hate, ignorance, fear and loathing, disgust, contempt, and lust and power. And now the fear of the loss of power. These civil servants have no Right to act upon their “view” to do anything. Neither have your colleagues and you have already disciplined them, with an investigation to come.

Not only has the Supervising lawyer from the Attorney General's Office swore an Oath of Office 'to do no Harm' and 'to obey the Law' all the other gov't employees have done the same. She broke the Oath when she turned her back on the illegal policy and the Harm and attacked my Discrimination Complaint, #1954. She has continued to disregard her Oath to Office. No one complained so why should politicians or other civil servants acknowledge the breach. Why didn't the HRT employees or lawyers employed by the HRT bring this forward? They have a legal duty to report things such as this.
Also, she may have been the Supervising lawyer when the wording of the Motor Vehicle Act statutes were changed in order to mislead the reader into believing that the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles has carte blanch to do what she or he wants. They do not. A supervisor in the A G office sanctioned the corrupted paraphrasing of the MVA in the Response to Complaint of Discrimination Compliant #1954. The misleading paraphrasing was not accidental. They got away with it then and it has resurfaced in the new Driver's Medical Examination Form, 2008. The civil servants have again broken the Law for their own gain, benefit, and protection. (I believe the RCMP is supposed to be investigating this. The Solicitor General of BC has not responded to my complaint concerning this. That is why the RCMP needs to investigate this.
The Deputy Superintendent of Motor Vehicles, who manages this Policy, has known for years the policy is illegal, known about the consequences, and has continued on with her agenda.
The Superintendent who has not stood up to Howie and her cronies should have canceled the policy knowing the Illegality and the Harm. He has turned his back on illegal behaviour.
All those in the Ministry of Health that are involved in the Policy and Harm have broken their Oath of Office. They wrote they know of the harm and monitor the influence upon the health care system. Killing and maiming is ok? It is not. Not even if the policy is legal. This is what gangsters do. Those civil servants should have stood up to the unproven medical demands of the OSMV and its anti-diabetic lobbyists who may be civil servants. The Min of Health evaluates whether or not the publics demand of the Medical system is something necessary or not. If not the demand is not accepted. The driver policy is not a medical necessity and should not be accepted. They have broken their own rules of engagement. They have turned their back on the illegal policy, the harm, and the fact that the policy is not a medical necessity. They do not obey the law and willfully participate in Harm.

Superintendent, are we to believe the gov't and its counsel have not talked about this while contriving their charades to protect themselves from and legal consequences from their actions? If I have finally come to realize this then they have known about this for a long time as this is what their counsel does for a living; look for consequences and play a game of chess to visualize future moves and counter moves, their strategy of corruption.
No, they know what they are doing and need to be charged with breaking their Code of Ethics or Oath of Office just as the RCMP has done to those colleagues in Vancouver.
*

Another Update

Another 'just realized' consequence of the Policy that needs to be investigated. “Insurance Coverage”
Reader, what happens if Williams, Layton, or/and the unknown women dies due to the consequences of the policy? There will certainly be Life Insurance paid out. But should the Life Insurance Companies be paying?

My point is, the life insurance will be paid out but there is a Liability here that is not known to the companies, something that needs to be brought out into the open for them to evaluate.
The consequences of the policy are responsible for those unexpected and unexplained deaths the Emerge doctors call NEWS conferences about. The Overcrowding is explained through the OSMV actions. The Overcrowding, the unexpected and unexplained deaths and maiming are not some opaque correlation but a direct consequence of the policy.
The Insurance companies need to know of this as they are paying for something they are not liable for. Gov't actions cause the deaths and they should be held accountable for the payment of the Life Insurance coverage, at the least.

My point is, “Is this another reason the gov't has stolen documents in an effort to legalize the Policy?” Just another denial of accountability and responsibility trying to be hidden with stolen documents?
“Is this why the gov't has stonewalled, procrastinated, and not fulfilled the demand of Law to legally justify the Policy?” Hoping they will retire and not be held responsible? Hoping I will give up? Hoping I will die of diabetes or of a health issue relating to diabetes. The gov't has tried to justify the policy with these medical conditions that may express in 10-15-20 years after being diagnosed with diabetes. (How is that for corruption and perverted thinking.) Hoping I will give up on the Canadian guarantee of the fulfillment of my Charter Rights, Human Rights, and Motor Vehicle Rights? Why should I? I have not done anything wrong?
Lastly, a Draft of a policy-to-be was written in 2006 early 2007. Why isn't there a Policy? The Law demands one if the gov't is to make demands of the public. Shouldn't the policy been put on hold in order to save lives? Shouldn't it been canceled in 2002-2004 when I directed the gov't to the research that proves there is no difference in driver mishaps between diabetic and non-diabetic drivers and brought forward, through letters, the horrific consequences of the policy?
Again, in the first instance the policy is illegal. The gov't has written they know of the Harm. They have continued with the Policy and Harm for the past eight years, from my initial inquiry of 2002-2004, knowing this. What does that make the deaths? If Williams, Layton, or the unknown woman dies what kind of death is that?
The Harm the OSMV and the Min of Health refer to in their letters to me, as they try to justify the policy, are not a boil on someone's bottom or an infected finger, although these people may well be in Emerge, as their health care availability to a GP is changed due to the policy. They really are referring to the killing, maiming and endangerment to life. The Emerge doctors are talking about the Overcrowding and unexpected and unexplained deaths and maiming that occur due to the Overcrowding. The Min of Health, the OSMV, and the Emerge doctors are talking about the same things, except the Emerge doctors have the guts to really talk about it. They are not constructing Democide, and yet they like me are involved in it.
And don't forget to add to the list the people that are/were on a surgery wait-list that should have had funding for surgery but the OSMV redirected funds to pay for the Driver's Medical Examination that does nothing positive and it is supposed to be justified from an illegal policy. How is their health? Did they die waiting? Did they die due to drug addiction for the two year waiting time? Did they die due to the medical condition or complications of the condition?
*
Insurance Claims

1. How many are needlessly dead from gov't Emerge Overcrowding and dead and maimed from gov't contrived surgery wait-lists? (Insurance is paid out for Death and Work Related Extended Care Benefits.)
2. How many millions of dollars have been paid out by the Insurance Companies for the consequences of this illegal gov't policy?
3. How many millions of dollars in Investment dollars have Investors lost due the fact Insurance Companies paid out on Death Policies, Mortgage Life Insurance policies, and Extended Care Benefits due to the Conscious Constructed Harm of a third party, the OSMV and its supporters?
4. How many millions of extra dollars have Life Insurance Holders needed to pay out for premiums due to the high Life Insurance payouts that should not have been paid by the Insurance Company in the first place?
5. How many of the Journals that have had their research stolen, used to justify the policy and its consequences, are insured by Insurance companies? (Isn't this why Journals have Copyright, Intellectual Property Rights, and Intent of Use Protection? For protection from thieves, corrupt gov't officials, things the research was not done for, etc?)
6. How many people on Extended Care, waiting for surgery that they should not be waiting for, are being paid 80% or so of their income by Life Insurance companies and should not be? Who would not be if they had the availability to tax dollars that are now used for an illegal policy.

Shouldn't the gov't that is causing these deaths, maiming, and loss of work income and death be paying for their Harm?
Shouldn't the gov't be held responsible for the financial liabilities as they know the policy is illegal and they have written they know the harm?
Isn't this behaviour fraud as they know the harm and have let the insurance companies pay the death benefits and extended care wages?

Superintendent, are we to believe the gov't and its counsel have not talked about these Consequences of the Policy? If I have just realized this, then by default we know they have known about this for a long time as they have Departments designated to understanding Actions/Reactions or Policy/Consequences. We are not allowed to pretend this in not happening or they have not worked through this.
The question now is, “What other Consequences of this Policy are not being acknowledged?”
Superintendent, “Isn't this Insurance Fraud?” Letting someone else take the fall for your actions. And you worry about investigating these civil servants, their Policy, and their charades done in order to justify it, such as the theft of the Protected research?

Superintendent, if your counsel investigated my complaint about Copyright etc very thoroughly and don't see any worth in standing up against corruption, death, maiming, theft, falsifying documents, which I believe I have debunked, why haven't they brought these Consequences forward; the Oath of Office breaches and Insurance fraud?
Are they in denial of the scope of the illegality of the policy and its horrific consequences upon the health care system, Human Rights, Constitutional Rights, Motor Vehicle Rights, now Insurance Companies Rights, the Oath of Office, and we cannot forget the falsifying of legal documents.
The civil servants are in denial of every thing they do aren't they. And they will do what ever is needed to keep the public and you from knowing what the consequences really are. The killing must be worse than presented in Updated Consequences.