27 pp, March 04, 2011, ICBC naivety, license cancellation

Dave Jenkins
3107 Tanglewood Way
Nanaimo, BC, V9T 5A5

March 4, 2011

Kathy Thomson
ICBC,
Director, Provincial Licensing
PO Box 3750, Victoria, BC, V8W 3Y5









Canada's Genocide
Thomson you and ICBC are now involved


Democide: large numbers of the Public killed by government Policy.
and
the Diabetic Driver's Policy is illegal and kills
so
what you have done to me is illegal unless you are involved in this?



Thomson, yes this is long but you get a new letter as this is new to you. The May 2010 review is also a review but lists others I have contacted, which is important as it shows how corrupt and harmful this policy really is as all concerned are afraid because they know this is an illegal gov't policy killing people and by the hundreds. It really is Democide.
Allegations of civil servant corruption, bias, prejudice, hate, ignorance, fear and loathing, contempt, and disgust for the diabetic and disabled takes time and pages to expose in order for you to understand for you to make connections to, to form context for an understanding of what is really happening concerning the illegal diabetic policy.



I'm still driving as you do not have the legal right to cancel my license, so when charges come upon me you better have you counsel prepared to defend you as you are now involved in an illegal policy that kills, maims, and endangers lives. These civil servant knowingly run this illegal policy, broke an out of court Human Rights settlement agreement and still run the policy which is Treason, falsified documents, have stolen research in an effort to justify the policy, lied in an Affidavit, lied about the theft, have mislead, misinformed, misrepresent about what they are really doing, and now have you doing their dirty work.

Thomson, you really need to read this as you have been used as their Scapegoat for their Hate, Criminal Acts, Treason, and Prohibited Acts. You need to prepare yourself before you contact those involved, prepare for their lies and corruption.




go to page 24 to see who else has been contacted about this


Dave Jenkins
3107 Tanglewood Way
Nanaimo, BC, V9T 5A5

March 4, 2011

Kathy Thomson
ICBC,
Director, Provincial Licensing
PO Box 3750, Victoria, BC, V8W 3Y5

re; your letter of “Notice of Cancellation”, February 03, 2011


Dear Kathy Thomson;

I do not acknowledge the “Notice of Cancellation”, as you do not have the Legal Right to do so. You have been lied to, mislead, and misinformed by the Office of the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles; the Superintendent, Steve Martin, and the Deputy Superintendent of Motor Vehicles, Lisa Howie, as she manages the Drives Policy and he is supposed to manage her, and the buck stops with these two, at least in the OSMV. He is also supposedly managing policy and paid well to make decisions and “given” the position of status, trust, power, and prestige, which Howie and he have abused.
You, thousands of others, and I have believed the Diabetic Driver's Policy is legal, which means Martin and Howie have complied with the demands of the Ministry of Public Safety and Solicitor General, the OSMV, their Oath of Office, as Senior Civil servants, and the Laws of Canada, the Tools or Instruments of the Democratic Society of Canada; the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, Section 1, the Human Rights Code, Section 8, and the Motor Vehicle Act, statutes or Sections 25, 29, and 92. They have not fulfilled any of these demands, they have lied and continue to lie. As they lie and misrepresent about diabetes, which is now 10% of our society, why should be believe they have fulfilled any demands concerning the other 100 or so medical conditions they say they manage? Today, that means 430 000 diabetics and we are a driving society, which is no small number of society that have had their Charter Rights not fulfilled, their Rights under the Human Rights Code not fulfilled and their Rights under the Motor Vehicle Act not fulfilled. And what about the demands of their Oath of Office?

As you will read below and in the accompanying “Updated Consequences” and Second Review, dated “May 7, 2010”, is that the Diabetic Driver's Policy is illegal, therefore the phoney Driver's Medical Examination, DME, is also illegal, therefore you do not have the Legal Right to cancel my license under these circumstances or any circumstances.
*

Let me be very clear here, there never has been a Policy Paper legally justifying the Diabetic Driver's Policy and there still isn't.
Thomson, you think about that and how you have been lied to, mislead, misinformed about the diabetes policy, therefore the Disabled Driver's Policy in general. I began my Inquiry in 2002 - 2004 and the OSMV has offered nothing to legally justify the policy, which is against the law. In the eight years of my inquiry nothing has been given, so you better think about the other hundred or so medical conditions Howie and Martin say they manage and who they force phoney medical examinations upon, especially the disabled. And now you know this, now ask why they do this? Bias, prejudice, hate, (not ignorance anymore), fear and loathing, disgust, and contempt of the diabetic, the disabled? Of the Law? Of life?
Secondly, think about the consequences of their intervention, as they intervene due to their “view” that the Consequences of Diabetes need intervention. This is why I have complained about Discrimination, as they refuse to prove a bona fide Need for government to stick its ugly face into my life. Also, they must acknowledge the Consequences of their behaviour; if consequences of something are used for intervention then the consequences of the intervention must be acknowledged also, or it is Discrimination. Doctors are not allowed to intervene unless the Consequences have been acknowledged. The Laws of Canada demand Government to the same, to keep Corruption controlled.
What are the consequences of these forced medical examinations upon the Universal Health Care System, UHCS, and doctors? Why won't Howie and Martin, and gov't really acknowledge this? Democide. What are the consequences of this public harassment, slander and libel, that I am a liability and need medical examinations, even though nothing has been offered to prove such a thing? Done without fulfilling the demands of the Charter, the HR Code, and the MVA; what are the consequences of not doing this? What kind of monster has the diabetic been turned into by these people for them not to have fulfilled these instruments of Democracy? Why am I forced to comply with the DME beyond what I already do as a diabetic? How does this affect me socially? What do you think of me as a diabetic? Other disabled people?
*

Insanity
Question; “Why is it that the Press and Academics study the above UHCS problems and always come back with the same result that nothing has changed with the problems?” They refuse to acknowledge there is only the two Entities, the Public and Government, and their demands and they never address or investigate the Government's demands. Why?
We use Albert Einstein to define this, “keep doing the same thing over and over again expecting change is the definition of insanity.” Are the Press and Academics insane or just so programed they do not want to look at what is really happening because it scares them, (fear about what this says about them and Canada)? I write them and give them the material I give you and they never write back. Why? Fear.
What did Jim Morrison sing about, “Break on through to the other side...” So, hold onto your hat while you read the Updated Consequences, and the May letter, as the policy really is illegal, it is Homicide on a grand scale, Democide, and Martin, Howie, and Hunt, (the supervising lawyer for the Attorney General's Office who is running the burying this illegal policy and its consequences) and other civil servants and politicians really are corrupt and I have written so to the RCMP and politicians. The policy is still here, the killing continues, and Canada is afraid of what it is doing to its citizens.
*

Fear
Tunisia, Egypt, and Libya. People in these countries have stood up and stated they are not afraid anymore. They want Democracy. They want their Human Rights.
I am not afraid of these corrupt civil servants and their killing and hate. Their lack of fulfillment of the demands of Democracy. Their lack of fulfilling the Human Rights Code. Their theft of science, placed within an Affidavit, in an effort to legally justify the policy.
Questions: “Why is it, that in such a nice place as Canada, so many people are Fearful of these monsters and their killing?”
“Why is the Press afraid to send their “Journalists” to Investigate this?
“Why are Politicians afraid to Investigate this?'
“Why are Opposition Politicians afraid to Investigate this?”
Don't forget, I just use the numbers the gov't has made public. I just put the charades together for all readers to see.
*

Our Medical System and Democracy
In a Democratic Society such as Canada, there are two Entities, the Public and the Government, that's it. To the left of Democracy there are the Socialist and Communist states where there is no Public, only the State. To the Right of Democracy there are Phoney Democracies, Authoritarians, Theocracies, Fascists, and Nazis and they don't have Public either, only the State. They have no real Public Constitutional Rights or Human Rights. We do, Canada does. Howie, Martin, Hunt, Dobbs, Gary Martin, Heemskerk, those involved in the Core Services Review Board that have stated this the Policy is “appropriately delivered by government and affordable”, those civil servants within the Min of Health Services that support this illegal policy, the Politicians that have turned their backs to this illegal policy and it corrupt civil servants care nothing for the Rules of Democracy or Canada. These people are the monsters within our society.
So, what we have here in Canada and British Columbia is the Government not fulfilling the demands of the Crown or instruments of Democracy, therefore these people are Traitors, as they are running Policy against the demands of the Crown or Government; in opposition to the demands of the Crown. Even broke a Crown out of court settlement agreement and continued running their illegal policy. And you wonder why the stole research, used an Affidavit, and presented it under the A G Office, S G Office, an academic researcher, and a, if not the, Liberal Law firm of Canada.
As for the UHCS the Government blames the Public for the failing Health Care System, but in reality they are the problem, as they run illegal demands, which are not acknowledged, therefore not funded properly, therefore not managed. Therefore, only one Entity, the Public's demands upon the UHCS are acknowledged and managed and we wonder why those interested in changing the problems we are experiencing, the Emerge Overcrowding, long wait - times for surgery, long wait - times to visit a General Practitioner, why G Ps are leaving their profession, and why people cannot have a G P, ambulatory delivery problems, and problems with Hospital Admission through Emerge and not through a medical Specialist or G P, all because only one Entity, the Public's demand is managed. The Government's demands are not acknowledged and it is hiding it. The illegal policy forced upon the diabetic and disabled need to be covered up. The consequences of this diabetic policy is another reason they are hiding their illegal activity. Now add all the other demands Howie and Martin make upon the UHCS for other medical conditions they say they manage, and now add all the Government demands.
A Review of my Inquiry, this Policy, Murder and the Manipulation of ICBC
I was diagnosed with type 2 in 1999 and began reading about diabetes, books and research, with the result that I came to understand the Policy and DME did not make sense. During 2002 - 2004 I made inquiries to the OSMV about this, they did not offer any Policy Paper or science to justify the policy, just their “view” that it is ok to do. Nor did they offer any Good coming from this policy or that the DME can do anything. How do you prove Good when there is no documented 'belief of Harm' or actual Harm in order to prove change, therefore Good. Actually “Driver Mishaps” is what modern research, from 1999 forward, calls accidents or motor vehicle incidents they investigate and study? 'Accident' and 'unknown Harm' is too prejudicial and fear inducing and the monsters I am confronting use Fear to scare people, so they do not investigate the policy, or its legality, or the fact the illegal policy kills and maims hundreds, maybe thousands of people a year.
I stated this diabetic policy was Discrimination, as the policy is based upon nothing but some civil servants “view” of life. If the civil servant cares nothing for their Oath of Office and the Charter, the HR Code, and the statutes of the MVA they are not Democrats like myself, they are Autocrats, Authoritarians, Fascists, and Nazis. When their policy started killing people and they knew it, before I brought the consequences of the Policy forward, and continued on with the killing and maiming they moved into the political status from Democrat, to Authoritarian, Fascist, to that of Nazis. This is who I am really fighting, Fascists and Nazis and murders. This is who you have been manipulated by and who have fought me for the past eight years with the Supervising counsel for the Attorney Generals Office and the private law firm Heenan Blaikie, and all the financial resources of the Solicitor and Attorney General's offices.

I stated that as the policy is not legally proved as needed, it's Discrimination.
I stated that as the policy is based upon the believed Consequences of type 2 without acknowledging the consequence of their actions, it's Discrimination.
(A difference in driver mishaps is the reason for the policy, not that diabetics are not involved in driver mishaps. That would be like saying non - diabetics do not have accidents. Modern Science has proved beyond a reasonable doubt that there is no difference in driver mishaps between non-diabetic and type 2 diabetics. The modern science does not support the policy little lone the killing and maiming and social assault upon the diabetic. That is why the research is Copyright Protected, Intellectual Property Protect and protected from Intent of Use, as is the work presented on the OSMV web page and other Government publications.
If there is a difference it must be Significant not something Insignificant; example, 0.001 of 1.0% difference is not significant in science or research and everyday life and the OSMV and the anti-diabetic lobby knows this.
Therefore, as the policy is based upon the supposed Consequences of diabetes it is then mandatory the OSMV and the anti-diabetic lobby acknowledge the consequences of their actions. Having not acknowledge this demand their actions are Discriminatory, biased, prejudicial, hateful, full of fear and loathing, contemptuous, and disgustful. Little lone anti - Democratic, anti - Charter of Rights and Freedoms, anti - Human Rights, and Traitorous.)

The consequences are the demand upon the UHCS. They refuse to acknowledge this which proves discrimination. The consequences are the Overcrowding in Emerge, long waits for surgery, the long waits to see a General Practitioner as he or she is filling out DME Forms, which do nothing except set me up as a liability, a Pariah, the Other to the public and you, so you just follow along with their illegal demands, which Howie and Martin know are illegal, does nothing Good, and kills and maims people. Plus it changes the service of ambulatory Care, hospital admissions through Emerge and not a Specialist or G P, etc.
Imagine their Hate to continue with this illegal policy all these years knowing the consequences of their Policy. It's theirs as if they obeyed the Demands of the MVA they would have canceled the Policy and they have not. Little lone the Charter and HR Code. So, they have continued on hoping I die from diabetes, or from complications as it is a chronic disease, or I give up due to age, or attrition, or they retire and disappear to Florida.
Never forget, Martin and Howie and other civil servants involved in this have not fulfilled their Oath of Office that demands they follow the Law, Do not Kill, Do not Harm, Do not Steal, Do not Lie, Do not Mislead, Do not Misrepresent, etc. and they have Not fulfilled the demands of the Charter, Section 1, the Human Rights Code, Sections 8, and the MVA, Sections 25, 29, and 92, the very sections they quote as giving them power to make demands of me. They only have power if they fulfill the demands of their Oath, Charter, HR Code, and the MVA, which they have not done. They run this policy in opposition to the Crown, the Laws of Canada.
Thomson, I am not their Nigger. They think I am but I am not. I am not your Nigger either. If you turn your back on this then that is your declaration of me, the diabetic, the disable, the person with No Rights in Canada. We are not an Authoritarian state, or Theocratic state, or Fascist state, or Nazi state. We are Democratic Society and democracy is hard to manage and these people care nothing for Democracy or Canada. I do. They are monsters not the diabetic or disabled.
*

Slimy and Sleazy defines Corruption
Lisa Howe, the Deputy Superintendent, who manages this policy, wrote that the policy is ok to do, as that in her “view” and other unknown civil servants “view” of life it is ok to do. Howie, as a public servant or civil servant, making decisions about demands upon the public has no “view”. Neither does Steve Martin, the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles, as they are bound to fulfill their Oath of Office to Obey the Law, do not Kill, do not Harm, do not Steal, do not Lie, do not Mislead, do not Misinform, etc, which they have not fulfilled. They have broken all these demands. They use their position of status, trust, power, and prestige to lie and manipulate. They use their position to threaten me and other drivers to conform or loose your license knowing the public does not have the funds to challenge them in the Courts, as they have all the resources of the Attorney Generals office and its private counsel to fight the public. As exemplified with the Supervising Counsel of the Attorney General's office, Hunt, with the eight years of denial, procrastination, and stonewalling concerning those two civil servants now guilty of breach of Oath of Office and accepting bribes to disclose inside information concerning the sale of BC Rail. Eighteen million dollars plus the cost of the RCMP. Our taxes used to defend those guys. Hunt, as the defender of the Crown, should have been at war with them not defending them.
My Inquiry into this Policy has been going on for the same time-line, 2002, and is not only about breach of Oath of Office but Homicide, maiming, and endangerment to life, breach of the Charter, the HR Code, the MVA, and Genocide; Democide, large numbers of the public killed by government policy. An illegal policy at that.
So imagine the work and cost to keep this hidden. Hunt has broken her Oath of Office to defend the Crown. She uses her position of status, trust, power, and prestige to bury and hide a policy opposite, in counter to, the demands of the Crown, which has horrific consequences; this is “Offenses Against Public Order”; “Treason” and “Prohibited Acts”. Sleazy and slimy or what?

All involved in this must fulfill the demands of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, the BC Human Rights Code, or the Motor Vehicle Act, which they have not. Their position has you just Believing they have. You believe, don't you. Sleazy and slimy, eh.

Howie wrote that other countries force this policy upon diabetics, so she is going to do this. This is what Fascists and Nazis do and did to the disabled, which I am Labeled and Classified as being, a disabled person for driving. So Howie defers her lack of accountability, criminal behaviour, lies, and corruption to unknown other's behaviour. Fascists and Nazis hunted the disabled, Laws are needed in our Country to protect people, the disabled, to give them Equality and Inclusion, so Howie and Martin think this is ok to do because others do this? The laws of our country are written down, there, so they do not do this.
So, she uses other peoples Hate and Corruption to justify her “view” of life. The Oath of Office and instruments of our “Democratic Society” are there to keep her Corruption, Hate, and lust for Power out of Public Policy and how government treats people. What does she think these laws are for? Who does she think these laws are for if not her? Sleazy and slimy.

My first Human Rights Complaint, #1954, 2004 - 2006, saw the A G office respond to my complaint. Their official Response to Complaint saw their lawyer, Lisa Lee (managed by Hunt) paraphrase the MVA sections they say gives them the legal right to run this policy and force the DME upon diabetics and the disabled. When I read the Response it was very clear that I had made a mistake about the MVA statutes and its power. However, the Response's meaning was so different than the MVA I had read that I went back to the Licensing Office and made copies of the MVA for comparison. What they had done was paraphrase the statutes and leave out the most important words, so that the reader would come to the conclusion that Howie and Martin can do what they want. This is not true, they must prove a need and legally justify it with proof that the public can read and make sense of and challenge if needed.
This is called falsifying legal documents; its Perjury and more. I may be able to make a mistake and get my knuckles wrapped but a lawyer is not allowed to do this, a lawyer representing the Crown is not allowed to do this, is not allowed to misinform with one, little lone all three of the three statutes listed. Sleazy and slimy.

The breach of the 'Out of Court or Human Rights Tribunal Hearing Settlement Agreement' is interesting. The OSMV asked for a Hearing, (managed by Hunt). I agreed. They then changed their minds and asked to settle out of hearing, with Heenan Blaikie showing up. A law firm of 700 or so lawyers, with Trudeau and Chretien and other high liberals as members; old boys from the days they helped bring the Constitution to Canada. Ironic, as the Liberal gov't of BC has not fulfilled the demands and yet they hire the firm associated with the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Slime and Sleaze, eh.
Do you wonder how long Heenan Blaikie been in the wings concerning this? Preparation since when? As they are paid by my taxes their involvement will be documented for tax purposes and gov't spending audits. What this will prove is the OSMV and Hunt had decided to stonewall from when, the very first letter of my Inquiry in 2002, because Howie knew the policy was illegal and killing people then?
Counsel from Heenan Blaikie, Iyer, was recently a full - time employee for the BC Human Rights Tribunal, which by default we ask, “Is there a conflict of interest? What happened in my third Discrimination complaint concerning this policy, #5791, written up as BCHRT 51, 04 Feb 2009.
“Is there a conflict of interest with Iyer presenting to the HRT?”
Actually, this is just good business on Heenan Blaikie's behalf, but were there favors given to Iyer because of this? How did she present stolen research material within an Affidavit and the HRT not charge with anything?
How did she present the lie about not knowing the scope of complaint, where her official Response to Complaint proved she did know this. This lie was used to change of scope of complaint, which was used to change a legal document. This was done to bury the theft of the stolen research and lie concerning the Oath of the Affidavit. How did she get away with this. Why did the HRT tell me to get a lawyer when I complained about the lie and theft?
Slippery and slimy.

The OSMV and counsel wrote the Settlement Agreement, not me. I had nothing to do with what was offered or the dates given for the promises. The OSMV broke the Settlement Agreement. It was not repaired, or amended, or re-written. Howie phoned me on the due date and asked for more time and the promise to make an amendment; asked for two or three weeks, I gave three. Nothing came. Of course not there was no Policy to update or science to prove the need. Or anything to legally justify the killing and maiming, if we, in a Democracy are allowed to do this.
I wrote the new Superintendent, Martin, he passed my complaint to Hunt, who stated only I say Howie asked for more time and promised an amendment. She also informed me she had tried to make an amendment to the breach. What a lie. The intervention was just a charade to make it seem she and Heenan Blaikie had really endeavoured to amended the breach. And yet, even as they played this charade out they did not amend or make new the breach. The pretend it has been renewed or legally fixed.
The law firm they say they contacted about this breach did not work for me anymore, as Community Legal Assistance Society was officially off the case when I signed to out of Hearing Settlement Agreement and Hunt and counsel know this by default. They set Howie up as my official contact if something went wrong. Just more lies by Hunt, Howie, Martin, and their counsel, Iyer. A Slimy and Sleazy charade.
In the letter to me about this charade Hunt blames the lawyer from CLAS for not being in the office or not returning a phone message or Fax concerning signing some invisible or non-existent amendment. He didn't have the legal right to do this and Hunt and Iyer knew this. (It's called blame the other guy for your corruption, strike first so everyone is looking at the other guy as Hunt has said it was his fault. She broke the Settlement Agreement not CLAS or me.)
What's interesting about this part of the charade is that Hunt refutes the point that I make about Howie phoning me and making the promise of three weeks and an amendment to a broken settlement agreement with the Crown, which they instigated and legally promised to do and never did, have not yet today, four years later. So, Hunt has us believing we need to believe her charade, the phone call and Fax to a lawyer that did not represent me, but we are not to believe that Howie phoned me and promised things? So, what happened to Howie after Hunt became involved again after Martin sent my complaint to her? Howie should have been fired after breaking her own agreement, as she had had years to legally justify the policy and didn't.
Do you really believe Howie phoned me for phone sex or something else not related to her breaking an Agreement with the Crown? She phoned me because she knew CLAS did not represent me and she was my formal contact if something went wrong, which it did, so she phoned. So, it is not until Hunt is again involved that the sleaze and slime again raises its ugly head. This is Treason on Hunt's behalf, as Howie did the right thing, to try and respect the demands of the Crown and Hunt buried it. So, Hunt is deceiving the Crown and running illegal things in opposition to the demands of the Crown. These acts by Hunt are “Prohibited Act”, as defined in the BC Criminal Code and Charter.
The settlement agreement is a legal commitment by the Crown to resolve an illegal policy with horrific consequences, which Howie broke. Which Hunt consciously broke. Just more Slime and Sleaze. What would Howie say under Oath? Would Hunt allow her to speak? Not likely. And Howie has become corrupt for not standing up for Canada and standing up against the Nazis and Traitor Hunt.
So, Hunt, Howie, and Martin run an illegal policy counter to the demands of the Crown. Look up “Offenses Against Public Order”, under the BC Criminal Code; Part II, “46” Treason, 2a. Look up Prohibited Acts, “49” “a” and “b”. Add this to the breach of the Charter, the HR Code, the MVA, and their Oath of Office.
Thomson, you are now involved in this with me and it is not nice. How does it feel to be involved in an illegal policy, gov't corruption, and mass murder? How does it feel to be manipulated by these people to the extent that you Cancel my license?

The promised Draft of the Policy did come and I did Review it. Don't forget, this is a Draft of a “Policy to be” not a Draft of an old existing Policy, as the OSMV and the unknown authors of the Draft mislead you to believe. More misleading information and slime.
The Draft is full of lies, misrepresentation, misleading arithmetic, fearful language, and misleading information coming from an authoritative figure. It is a good representation of how Fascists and Nazis construct the Pariah, the Other, so they can do what they want and not fulfill the demands of the Democratic Society Canada is. (Democratic Society from the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, Section 1.)
I then received a Policy, which was then canceled, as I was sent a new Draft and nothing further; I also review this new material only to discover the authors only deleted some things and moved others around to make it seem the Policy Paper had made changes to my Reviews.
Again, there were no documents to justify the policy or acknowledgment of the consequences; how does gov't justify killing and maiming from its illegal policy? That was late 2006 early 2007. A Policy Paper concerning this demand upon diabetics was supposed to arrive in 2007.
What is sleazy and slimy about this, other than the Hate needed to write something likes these documents? The authors of the prejudicial documents did not offer one scientific document to justify the Policy. Nothing.
Secondly, they did not offer any scientific documents to justify that the Driver's Medical Examination could do anything; which is to predict, prevent, and manage hypoglycemia, the very thing that the policy is about.
Third, how they have damaged the medical system, which is the killing and maiming in Emerge, of the maiming of people waiting for surgery, and the endangerment of lives.
Also, they did not offer any acknowledgment that they had fulfilled the demands of the Charter, the HR Code, the MVA, and their Oath of Office.
Fourth, they offered no science to prove any Good coming from this policy.
Fifth, they did not acknowledge that diabetics do take care of themselves with visits to General Practitioners. They set me up as a failure, someone that does not visit doctors, therefore an illegal policy must be used to manage these diseased corrupt diabetics and disabled.
These unknown authors really are slimy and sleazy humans. They really are Nazi scum.

The settlement agreement not only changed who pays for the DME, your taxes do now, but also reimbursed the doctors fees I paid between 1999 – 2004, the year of my HRT Discrimination Complaint. However, it was not until some time later, during my complaint of the broken settlement agreement and the Reviews I wrote for the OSMV that I became aware that no other diabetics or disabled were reimbursed their DME fees. I wrote the OSMV about this. It refused to respond about this inquiry. They changed who pays for the DME from just my type 2 complaint to include not only type 1 and gestational diabetics and All disabled drivers. I didn't ask for this, I only informed the OSMV and the HRT that I needed to pay for the DME and it wasn't needed and didn't do anything. If the OSMV were this inclusive for the DME why not be inclusive for the reimbursement to all disabled drivers? If they did it would show a $25 million debt for the Auditor General and the Public to ask questions about, exposing the illegal policy and criminal behaviour, not a good thing for Hunt, Howie, Martin, and gov't.
What is sleazy and slimy about this? We're talking about Disabled People here. We're talking about an Illegal Policy. We're talking about the consequences of an illegal policy that kills and maims the Public.

Hunt is managing this. Hunt, Howie, Martin, and unknowns made a conscious decision not to reimburse the disabled knowing full well they also paid for an illegal DME that has not been proved to do anything. And these disabled and diabetic also visit the G P or a doctor concerning their condition, which Martin, Howie, and Hunt refuse to acknowledge. They consciously screwed the disabled, those people obeying a demand that they believe is legal and does good, all the while Howie and Martin know they are lying to the disabled and public. The disabled work hard for their licenses to be part of society, to participate in Inclusion and Equality within Canadian society. This conscious abuse of the disabled is what Fascists and Nazis do to people they consider non proper citizens, not human. People of no worth and value. People whom they do not need to apply their rules of society to. Sleaze and slime. (This second Discrimination Complaint is online under HRT Decisions, Jenkins and Jenkins obo Diabetic Drivers of BC etc, BCHRT 445 05 Dec 2008)

My Third Discrimination Complaint, mentioned above, came about because the OSMV did not present a Policy after they had agreed to do so; this was two years after the settlement agreement and thirty or forty years after implementing the policy. They have known all along that the Policy was not legal and that no science justified the policy, nor does today, that the DME does not do anything, and that the Policy's consequences Kills, maims, and endangers lives. They choose to Not fulfill the demands of their Oath of Office, the Charter, the HRT Code, and the MVA. They choose to run this policy outside the demands of the Crown, to run this policy in opposition of the Crowns demands, and the promises the Crown made with me, the public, in the Settlement Agreement they, the Crown initiated and broke. This is why they are “Traitors” and guilty of “Prohibited Acts”. And “Hate”, Perjury, Genocide, etc.
All the while I was a good little Canadian obeying the demand under the Treat of loosing my license for non-compliance; one complies because we believe the gov't has justified its intrusion into our lives. After many letters back and forth with the HRT they agreed to hear arguments for and against a Hearing. The OSMV Responded to my Complaint and then Responded with a demand for an Early Dismissal, which is outside of a hearing, where there is no Public for witness, no Press for witness, no witness' called; only written submissions. It was interesting how quickly their counsel responded and with how much material was presented in such a short time after my Complaint. It begs the question of how long Heenan Blaikie was working on this strategy, knowing all along they had not renewed the breach settlement agreement and no Policy had been given to me, and that the Drafts I had reviewed offered no science to justify the policy it consequences and that no changes to the DME were made. Or that the policy would be canceled. Don't forget, lawyers for large law firms such as Heenan Blaikie document their time will all their cases with case numbers, sometimes automatically done, for billing purposes, especially when concerning the Public Purse. It would be interesting to know when Iyer was hired to present this and why they were working so far in advance of my anticipated complaint. They work ahead of time because they know they have not done anything concerning legalizing the Policy and we know this because they hired an academic researcher who stole research to do so. I imagine it's hard to find a Nazi researcher to falsify science to cover up Genocide.
It was also interesting to be confronted by Howie's counsel, Iyer, that the third complaint was the same as the first complaint, #1954, therefore not acceptable, as the HRT had evaluated that one and it would be the same thing, therefore no need to be heard again. However, that is not true. Firstly, the HRT did not evaluate my first complaint, it was only given a Case Number, # 1954. When the OSMV asked to settle out of hearing the complaint was withdrawn, the only paper work done was just formal HRT paperwork to withdraw the complaint, no evaluation or judgment from the HRT. If it was evaluated in any way it would have been written up by the HRT in Decisions and it was not. Written up as the third one was, case # 5791, and after evaluation called BCHRT 51, 04 Feb 2009. As the HRT does not hold on to complaints, mailing them back to the Complainant and Respondent, you will need to contact the Attorney General's Office for their copies of Complaint #1954, or me. So, why did the HRT accept this lie? Threats? Promises? Former employee, Iyer's influences?
Secondly, counsel for the OSMV presented a case that was supposed to be similar to mine, they used that case to propose that allowing me to continue on with my complaint should not be allowed, as it was similar to the case earlier heard by the HRT and written up for all to see and review. However, this means there is one case to review and one not available for review. From above, my complaint #1954 was never evaluated therefore no write up in Decisions for review. This is just another charade presented to mislead. It is like Hunt saying she phoned and faxed the lawyer from CLAS with a proposal, or actual amendment, or new Settlement Agreement but Hunt cannot prove any such thing, as CLAS never received anything and only Hunt says she did these things. If my First Complaint was not evaluated and written up by the HRT and recorded in Decisions how can we make a comparison for similar complaints? We can't.
Another example of a phoney charade played to deceive everyone from the actual facts is the Draft I reviewed. There was no Previous Policy to Review for comparison to the Draft I was given for Review. Hunt and her corrupt clients lead one, or the public, to believe there is a Previous Policy that I am comparing my Review to. There wasn't. I Reviewed the policy as a Document unto itself and instead of a Review, as I came to understand how corrupt and prejudicial the Document was, I Criticized it for all to read, to come to understand how corrupt Howie and Martin are, as they initiated and presented this Draft as something to be compared to and a 'Policy To Be', knowing there was no Previous Policy. It was just another charade to divert from taking any responsibility of Their Policy, its illegality, and its killing.

What's also interesting about the above charade Hunt and Iyer played out concerning my third complaint, that it is the same as another case, is that the complaint they present was an old case and counsel already had it in hand when they offered the original Settlement Agreement.
“So what?”, you say. What this means is that they did not bargain in Good Faith of Good Will. That they already had a case in hand to present, to stymie any future complaints I would engage in, if and when I came to understand they were not going to make changes to the Diabetic Driver's Policy.
Human Rights bargaining is done in Good Faith or has Good Will. This is a fact of the HRT and can be understood while reading their Decisions. Both parties need to be approachable, accommodating, and compromising. This is how Human Rights Complaints are resolved, a third party intervention based on Trust of presentation, done to resolve complaints fairly quickly, before spending years and millions of dollars in court. So, I played by the HRT rules, they were not involved in any presentation to evaluate so they were not involved in the charade, therefore, not in a position to complain? Or were they after Hunt and Iyer presented the charade about the old HRT complaint?
This is just another example of the slime and sleaze surrounding this complaint, Hunt, Iyer, Martin, and Howie.
Why didn't the HRT acknowledge this breach of bargaining? Why did the HRT accept counsel's presentation that they had evaluated my complaint? If they had they would, by law, have needed to write it up, to have a record of it, and would have put it online. There is nothing about complaint #1954 for you to evaluate and compare the so called similar complaint to.
So, as the public, we need to ask how long before my third complaint was lodged had the Martin, Howie, Hunt, and Iyer been preparing for my next complaint? How much did they spend having Heenan Blaikie preparing documents? When did they hire the Nazi academic researcher, Dobbs, who presented 185 articles, books, scientific research, and stuff to justify the policy, therefore the murder and maiming?
The research to justify the policy sounds good doesn't it. Finally, documents to justify the policy, but this is for a future policy. You can't use old and modern science, presented today to justify an old policy and its consequences; you are not allowed to kill someone today and five years later pretend science justifies the killing, and this is what they tried to do. Slippery try at misleading you, the reader, by the OSMV, its academic researcher, its counsel, Iyer and Hunt.
Secondly, the research was presented under an Affidavit, which is the swearing of an Oath. An Oath the guarantees all within the Affidavit is true and legal for use. It was presented under the position of Oath, the position of the Hunt, the Supervising lawyer for the Attorney General's Office, Heenan Blaikie's Human Rights Lawyer, who for this purpose is a government employee as our taxes pay for her and she is representing the Crown, Martin, the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles, Howie, the Deputy Superintendent of Motor Vehicles and lastly a lawyer Crystal Fersovich, from Armstrong Law, Edmonton, Alberta.
So, you would have just accepted this as legal due to the Affidavit and their position of status, trust, power, and prestige. You would wouldn't you. Because you believe that all is good and legal because to the Laws of Canada and the rules of the Human Rights Tribunal.
What is slimy and sleazy about this? You would have been wrong to again just believe those involved, as there was no Permission Forms for Copyright use, Intellectual Property Rights use, and Intent of Use Protection. This means they stole all the material and used their position to mislead you the reader about the legality of use. This is not only theft but Perjury and more. How's that for slime and sleazy behaviour?
And the HRT buried this. You won't find this mentioned the HRT decision online. This begs the question, “How did their past employee, Iyer, get away with this?” Was the HRT threatened? Were members of the HRT threatened or promised favours? Financial or social positions or both?

Thomson, do you really believe the policy is legal? That you have the legal right to cancel my license? You don't.
*

BC Human Rights Tribunal Corruption
Go to the BC HRT web page for their Decision concerning my last Discrimination Complaint, which proves the policy is illegal and has been illegal for years, lodged in 2008 and written up online in 2009.
Jenkins v. British Columbia (Ministry of Public Safety and Solicitor General - Office of the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles), 2009 BCHRT 51 - 04 February 2009

What you come to understand with this decision is that the policy has been illegal ever since I was diagnosed with type 2 diabetes in 1999 and before. It is only based upon Deputy Superintendent Howie's “view” of life. Again, I am forced to undergo the Driver's Medical Examination under the threat of loosing my license for non-compliance to a gov't policy that I thought was a legal demand because I, as a type 2 diabetic drivers was a liability, but not proved and the science I read during 1999 – 2002 debunked Howie's, (and the previous Superintendent and now Martin) bias, prejudice, hate, ignorance, fear and loathing, disgust, contempt and discrimination toward the diabetic and possibly all disabled. Now I know I'm not a liability, whereas it is the corrupt criminal civil servants that are the killers, thieves, liars, and monsters that have denied me my Constitutional Rights, Human Rights Code Rights, Motor Vehicle Rights, and the Right to have civil servants fulfill their Oath of Office even when no one is watching over them.
Secondly, what to come to understand concerning the Decision; you will read the Scope of the complaint was changed, but that demand for scope change only came about when I challenged the theft of the research presented and within the Affidavit. The gov't lied about not knowing the scope of the complaint. If you read the Original Response to my Discrimination complaint you will read their lawyer, Iyer, acknowledges she knew the complaint was about type 2 diabetes, not diabetes in general, as the HRT mistakenly wrote. So Iyer and Hunt presented a lie, which changed the legal document concerning the scope of the complaint; this is called falsifying legal documents and perjury, and more.
Again, from the above presentation of the third complaint being the same as the original complaint, which is another lie and another charade to deceive; the statement that the third complaint is the same as the first complaint again proves Iyer and Hunt knew the scope of the third complaint, as they are saying the third is the same as the first, which should not be heard as according to them it was evaluated and found what? Not worthwhile, not valid. No, it was not evaluated at all as I withdrew the complaint before evaluation by the HRT. This first complaint was about type 2 diabetes and not diabetes in general, which would include type 1 and gestational diabetes.
So, the question to ask is; “Why ask for a change in Scope?”
I was involved in this request to change the scope to only type 2, done on the phone with the HRT manager of the complaint, where she, Iyer, and I were addressing protocol of the Hearing to come, where I didn't have time to reflect upon the request to change the scope and its legitimacy, but I couldn't call Iyer a liar on the phone, but I knew she was. Don't forget, Howie called on the phone and asked for things to be done, I accepted this, but when they did not happen and I complained Hunt responded that only I say Howie asked for change and promised it. It is not good enough to say I shouldn't have been so naïve. This is the Crown making promises that were broken and the Crown then promising to repair the broken legal document. You and I are supposed to trust the Crown as it is managed by the Charter, the HR Code, the MVA, and the Oath of Office of its employees. This should be good enough. Although there is a sore taste in my mouth this is the HRT case manager, and the HRT absolute umbrella of Trust and Good Will or Good Faith, so one carries on as there is a witness this time. So, with a witness this time, the HRT case manager, who would think Iyer would be so brassy as lie? She did lie as the above exemplifies. It was only afterwards that I remembered the Original Response to Complaint where Heenan Blaikie's lawyer, Iyer, wrote numerous times she knew what the scope was. Don't forget, the decision to have the phone call about the Hearing protocol was initiated before any decision on the Early Dismissal presentation had been made. The change of scope was to influence the reading of the Early Dismissal presentations, so the Original Response to Compliant seemed and was in the past, a charade played by Iyer knowing the Original Response was past material and not within the Early Dismissal presentation and forgot by all, or they were hoping by all.
So, why the lie?
This lie was to defer any responsibility for the presentation of the stolen documents and the breach of the Oath of Affidavit. Done to cull all documents presented that did not relate to type 2. Done to diminish the criminal behaviour as over 95% of the presented material would need to be culled. This diminishes the number of researchers and owners of the research that may sue for breach of Copyright Protection, theft of Intellectual Property Rights, and abuse of Intent of Use Protection.
(The RCMP, in response to my complaint concerning this theft informed me the Owners need to complain, as at this time Canada's Copyright and Intellectual Property Rights law only concerns non - Canadians breaking these Protection instruments for Canadian Rights; like Blackberry, RIM, the USA company needed to sue RIM, as the RCMP could not intervene. Do you think Iyer and Hunt knew this? Of course they did. Heenan Blaikie offers legal advice on 'Trademark', which is Copyright and Intellectual Property rights. Hunt is the Supervising lawyer for the Attorney General's Office, it is her job to know these things. Yes, they played a game, I caught them, which brought their already in hand response if they did get caught, decrease the number of people that could sue, and if not caught the science would be used to justify the Policy and the owners of the science would not even know.) How's that for slimy and sleazy.
The lie to change the scope, which falsely changed the scope, therefore official legal documents relating to it is what? Another act of Perjury, Fraud, and falsifying documents and more.
I complained to the HRT about the lie and was told to get a lawyer if I didn't like what was done.

The second change of Scope; which you read about in the HRT Decisions concerning my third Discrimination complaint, BCHRT 51 04 Feb 2009 is Perjury, Fraud, falsifying legal documents, and more. I was not involved in this change and yet I was in the change of scope demanded by Iyer to change the Discrimination Complaint from diabetes to type 2. The change above was instigated by Iyer, in the presence of the case manager and myself, it was a formal request and all parties needed to be involved, who then forwarded it to the HRT office manager, who then changed the official HRT complaint to be concerned with only type 2 from diabetes in general.
How is it that the HRT then Reversed this legal change back to not only “diabetes”, which is type 1, type 2, and gestational, but All medical conditions the OSMV says it manages for the benefit of society?
As I was not involved in the change of scope of my complaint the Decision is invalid, against established protocol, the HRT changed my complaint and they did not have the legal right to do so.
This begs the questions; “Who told them to do this?”
“What was used as a threat?”
“Was it blackmail?”
“What was promised if they buried Discrimination Complaint as they did?”
“Were people promised jobs outside the HRT?” Iyer moved to Heenan Blaikie.
“As it seems all the players are women, Martin is hiding himself from any involvement, is there a Sexual Context involved in this corruption?” Sex is part of Corruption, there is Power and Fear involved in Gang Sex.

In my first Review of all that has happened to me, in order for readers to understand the Character, their Connections, therefore a Context, May 2009, I reviewed the actions of the players involved and came to the conclusion these women act like a gang; they fulfill the definition of gangsters due to their behaviour and support for each other; I labeled them the Matriarchal Mommas Gang. In gangs there is also the role of Sex, whether male or female gangs.
Don't forget, this policy is illegal and they all know it. The demands of the Charter have been consciously broken, the settlement agreement was broken and not repaired, it involves theft on a grand scale, mail fraud, inter - provincial mail fraud, breach of Affidavit, forced medical exams that cannot do what they are alleged to be able to do, abuse of the disabled, conscious failure to fulfill the HR Code, corrupt lawyers, corrupt civil servants, conscious failure to fulfill the demands of the MVA, conscious acts of lying, falsifying legal documents, killing, maiming, endangerment to lives, misuse of Taxes to fund the illegal policy, etc. When all this is happening we must entertain the fact that sex is involved. Sexual relationships used as Power over others, used as bonding between players, used as blackmail against players? To not attend to this fact of Gangs and life would be naïve. There are enough people pretending they are naïve and turning their backs to this policy and its consequences that it makes one believe there is a Sexual Context that is prevalent and a driving force. Just another perverted behaviour concerning the senior civil servants and this illegal policy and its consequences that our society does not want to acknowledge. It's as if Afghanistan and Arab states are the only phoney democracy, that we need to fight there, that we as Canadians are above reflection upon ourselves and take Democracy and Rights as a given and we do not need to review and challenge the monsters within.
This is the supervising lawyer for the Attorney General's Office running this? Heenan Blaikie hired Iyer from the HRT. Certainly more money and prestige with these two entities than the piteous pay of the HRT.
Secondly, how could the HRT do this not only knowing the policy is illegal but kills, maims, and endangers lives? With government policy there should not be a glimmer of Harm or Death or illegality. So, why did the HRT do this for these liars, thieves, murders?

So, what did this lie, (the lie of saying the OSMV and its counsel did not understand the scope of the Discrimination Complaint) lay the foundation of? They not only withdrew all the science they stole, not concerning type 2 diabetes, but All the research science, books, articles, and papers; everything. So, this means they withdrew their defense of their Response that they initiated, the presentation of defense of policy with science that they had never presented before. With the withdrawal of their science, done to justify the policy as something legal, means they voluntarily withdrew their defense of the policy that they initiated. This presentation of science means Howie and Martin, and their corrupt lawyers are publicly stating the policy had been illegal and they were only then legally justifying the policy but withdrew the science as I caught them stealing it and hiding this theft within an Affidavit, and the power of lawyers, trying to have the Power of Affidavit deceive readers as to what they were really doing.
Therefore, the policy is not supported by any documents to fulfill the demands of the Charter, the HR Code, the statutes of the Motor Vehicle Act, little lone these civil servants' Oath of Office.
Therefore, it is illegal, so why did the HRT not find the policy not only Discriminatory, but breaching my Constitutional Rights, the Human Rights Code, and the demands of the Motor Vehicle Act?
Why didn't the HRT charge these people breach of Oath of Office?
Why didn't the HRT charge these people with breaching the Oath of the Affidavit?
Why didn't the HRT charge Howie, Martin, Iyer, Hunt, Fersovich, and Dobbs with theft, perjury, and more?
Why did the HRT then give the these people an indefinite time, by changing the scope of my complaint, to legally justify the policy, when they just were caught stealing research and breaching an Affidavit?
“Why didn't the HRT put the policy on hold knowing it is illegal and harms until the OSMV proves a need and the intervention does Good, etc?”
“Why didn't the HRT put the policy on hold knowing it is illegal and harms and knows Diabetics visit the doctor, as I do, twenty times to the one time I am forced to comply with? Don't forget, if a diabetic is using medication the prescription are renewed by a doctor visit every three months, blood and urine work done every three months. The Nazis cannot acknowledge this as it would prove the diabetic Pariah, the Other, the Nigger, does take care of himself. Nazis can not let the public know this fact.
Done because the policy really is illegal, discriminatory, and has killed a lot of people, so they buried it.

Thomson, the policy is illegal today, as the OSMV has not offered any documents or policy, supported by any science to justify the policy, its consequences and these criminals demands to use you to cancel my license. So you have no right to cancel my license.
*

Also, you will read in the last Discrimination Complaint, BCHRT 51, 04 Feb 2009, where it states the policy concerning diabetes is ready. Ready? Ready for what? That is a lie. If it was ready why wasn't it given to me to read? If it was ready, with legal documentation, why wasn't it given to me to prove the policy is legitimate?
If it was ready and bona fide I would have stopped this Inquiry and the fight for my Constitutional Rights, my Human Rights, my Rights under the Motor Vehicle Act, and my Right to have civil servants fulfill their Oath of Office.

Secondly, “How is it that the HRT knew the policy was ready and I didn't?”
They must have had a private meeting with the OSMV and those concerned with the policy and its horrific consequences and made the decision to lie and bury this Discrimination Complaint with another lie.
Why wasn't the 'ready policy' listed as Confidential, where I could read it and come to understand the policy was legal, which would afford me the option to withdraw my complaint of Discrimination?
This would prove they had fulfilled the demands of the Charter, the HR Code, the MVA, and their Oath of Office. They didn't offer this so called 'ready Policy' because it is not true, it is not ready, as it cannot be justified with science, as the science does not prove a need, little lone justify the consequences. Don't forget, they just withdrew All their stolen science because what was left, concerning type 2, was not enough science to justify the policy even if the owners gave permission; it must be remembered that they presented science I read that justified my discrimination Complaint; did they only come to understand this after they read my Deconstruction of the Nazi academic researcher's presentation, that they hired to steal science and present under the Oath of Affidavit?
Lies within lies and more lies. Again, the right hand offering something, while the left is doing something absolutely different.
Secondly, it cannot be justified due to the horrific consequences of the policy; the killing, maiming and endangerment to life of thousands in the Emerge and those waiting for surgery. How does Hunt, Howie, Martin and the politicians involved justify that, the Attorney General, the Solicitor General, and the Minister of Health Services?
*

Government Killing
One death is an accident.
The second death should have seen the policy put on hold especially as they know they are harming and the policy is illegal.
The third death is homicide.
The fourth is what? The fourth is serial killer.
The fifth is mass murder.
The sixth is a Crime Against Humanity.
The seventh is Genocide. Or more correctly in a Democratic society such as Canada, Democide; the deaths of large numbers of the public by government policy.

One death per month, due to the Emerge Overcrowding, in one of the ten largest hospitals of the one hundred or so in BC, is twelve (12) a year. Times the ten busiest hospitals is one hundred twenty (120) a year. Times eleven years, since 1999, my declaration of diabetes and forced DME, and we have 1320 dead people coming from the Overcrowding caused by illegal OSMV policy.
Thomson, when you read the “Updated Consequences” don't forget I already visit a G P specifically for diabetic care, 20 times in the five (5) year cycle for diabetes and am still forced to comply with the DME which does nothing.
Secondly, don't forget that today diabetes is now 10% of society, so work out how many clients a G P sees in a year, (6 per hr x 8 hrs x 5 days x 52 weeks = 12 480 clients a year) giving us how many clients have their availability to her or him changed, so they go to Emerge instead of waiting 5 – 7 days. For diabetes it's 35 – 40 G Ps, or approximately 4 G P per 1% of society, (12 480 client visits a yr x 30 doctors = 374 400 or 40 doctors = 499 200 client visits that have their availability changed). There is no formula, statistics, or calculus involved, nothing but the numbers the OSMV and gov't gives about what they are doing. Now you know how this illegal policy creates Overcrowding, the killing, maiming, endangerment of life and why they want to bury this. This is what Fascists and Nazis do to cover up their hate and murder.
Then add all the other conditions the OSMV says it monitors; they say one hundred. If each is only 1% of society, then it is 400 doctors times the number of clients one G P sees in a year. If 2% of society it is 800 times the number of clients a G P sees in a year. If 3%? At 3% , such as heart problems, drinking, drugs, etc then that is 1200 G Ps or 20 – 25 % of G Ps filling out Forms just for the OSMV corruption. If 400 G Ps are used to fulfill the Forms then that is
400 G Ps x 12 480 clients a G P sees in a year = 4 992 000 client visit. That's more than the population of BC, but don't forget I see the G P four times a year for diabetes and I have other visits. If the other conditions are only 0.25 of visits it is still a 1 500 000 client visits and if only a few choose to visit the Emerge it more than explains the unexplainable problem with Emerge Overcrowding, long wait - times for surgery and to visit a G P, etc.
Then add all the other demands the gov't has upon the public that may be illegal, therefore certainly not acknowledged as demands, therefore not managed but the debit upon G Ps is still there. And you wonder where G Ps are. Why they are not available for new clients. Are leaving because 20 - 25% of their time is for phoney DME and Forms.
Do you really believe Emerge doctors call Press conferences concerning one death per month due to Overcrowding? Do you really believe that? They work in life and death. That's what they do. What is the total for 1 death a week? More than the Genocide in Bosnia? Five or ten times the deaths of Canadian troops and Press in Afghanistan? And we are in Afghanistan for Democracy, Human Rights, Women Rights and here in Canada it is women that are denying the disabled their Democratic Rights, Human Rights, and people their Right to Life.
*

Drafts and Policy I Reviewed
What you do not know about this corruption is that I Reviewed a Draft of a 'Policy'; a Settlement Agreement promise. Not a Draft of an existing Policy to Review, but a 'Policy to Be'. It was difficult to Review as I had nothing to compare to. This also proves the policy has been and still is illegal. I was then sent a Policy paper, but it was canceled due to the arrival of another Draft.
Also, not one of these documents presented any documentation to prove the need for the policy.
Nor any documentation that the DME can do what it is alleged to be able to do and that is predict, prevent, and manage hypoglycemia, the very thing the policy is about. (How insane is that?)
Nor any acknowledgment of the consequences of the intervention, the DME.
Nor anything proving the policy does any Good. (How insane is that?)
Nor that any diabetic taking medicine, such as myself, must visit the doctor every three months for prescription renewal and conversation about diabetes. Every three months I also have my urine and blood taken to help manage my diabetes; this is proactive medicine offered by my G P, the medical system, and practiced by myself. This is never acknowledged by the Superintendent, Martin, or Deputy Superintendent, Howie, nor the bigoted, prejudicial, hate-filled, lying unknown authors of the Drafts and Policy papers I reviewed. The people that wrote the Drafts and Policy really are slimy sleazy Nazi scum and you and I don't know who they were.
So, for the HRT to say a Policy had been written is a lie, because if there really is a proved scientific need for a policy they also need to acknowledge the consequences of their intervention, the killing, maiming, and endangerment to life, plus the negative impact upon the health care system and doctors. Which they didn't.
Are they really allowed to kill because they think I'm a driving liability?
Are they really allowed to manipulate ICBC about this in-order to have you cancel my license if I become too uppity and challenge Howie's construction of me as the Pariah, the Other, the Nigger, the non - human with no Rights, Worth, and Value?
*

Insurance Claims
Now you know the policy is illegal what does this say about your, ICBC's, payout for deaths, loss of limbs, and maiming coming from driver mishaps, which happened after the driver mishap; caused by the Overcrowded Emergency facility where the injured were taken too?
What does this say about your payout for Extended Care due to harm caused by the Overcrowded Emerge, that is constructed by illegal gov't demands not by the demands from the Public upon the Universal Health Care System?
(Again, I use “driver mishaps” as that is how modern research defines motor vehicle accidents or incidents concerning diabetic drivers, as the term “accident” is misleading and prejudicial against the disabled driver, all drivers really, as accident infers to heads rolling down the street and carnage, which is not a truthful description of all motor vehicle incidents. Whereas, the insurance claim or report of incident may have only been a fender bender or someone making a claim for a damaged garage or garbage can, which brought forward the claim of accident, claim of driver mishap, misleading the reader or research as to what really is being investigated and reported upon.)

As you will read in the enclosed “Updated Consequences” I have contacted Insurance companies of Canada about this. Thomson, insurance payment for death, maiming, loss of limb at driver mishap is what insurance is for. If it is caused by the Overcrowding in Emerge it is not your duty or obligation to pay for such things, as the public did not cause the Overcrowding; the government did. Our taxes need to pay for this and Martin and Howie as responsible.
Again, don't forget, in a Democratic Society such as Canada, there are two Entities, the Public and the Government, that's it. In Socialist and Communists states there is no Public, only the State. To the Right of Democracy there are Phoney Democracies, Authoritarians, Fascists, and Nazis and they don't have real Public Constitutional Rights or Human Rights or a Public only the state. So, what we have here is the Gov't blaming the Public for the failing Health Care System, but it really its really the illegal demands of Gov't causing Harm and then hiding it.
We as society have the OSMV and its illegal policies causing the Overcrowding, they know this and have not worked to resolve their illegal demands upon the UHCS, therefore they are responsible for the liability.
This is why they have procrastinated, stonewalled, lied, stolen research, falsified legal documents, influenced the Human Rights Tribunal, perjured themselves by falsifying an Affidavit, etc in order not to be held responsible and accountable for their actions; this includes the lies and documents signed by ICBC in order to do the things you do in partnership with the OSMV, like canceling my license.
Are you like Martin and Howie and just do things because in your “view” it is ok to do? Or, did you really sign legal documents, based upon the belief that the OSMV had the legal right to do what they are doing?
Isn't that signing legal documents under false pretenses? More perjury? More falsifying legal documents?
Have you been like me and the other 400 000 diabetics and the other 1 000s of disabled who also believed, only to discover Martin and Howie are liars, thieves, and murders?

How much has this cost ICBC? From at least 1999 when I was coerced through lies and the threat of loosing my license?
How long has this illegal policy been running?
How much have these costs influenced everyone's insurance cost?
How much has this cost ICBC for loss of work; of the increased injury caused by the lack of health care due to the Overcrowding caused by illegal gov't policy and demands the Emerge doctors hold Press conferences about?
For cost of rehabilitation of the injured that should not have been or is being experienced by the injured if the Emerge facility was not Overcrowded and health care available within a reasonable time?

This is Insurance Fraud, as you have been deceived into believing you are responsible for the liability, where clearly it is not your fault that caused the death, loss of limb,and maiming due to Overcrowding.
This is Insurance Fraud and more, as you have just demonstrated, by canceling my license, which you believed the right thing to do because the policy was/is something you believed to be legal. Which you now know it is not.
*

The new Driver's Medical Examination Form
You now know the policy is illegal, as Section 29 of the MVA demands have not been fulfilled, which does not give the Superintendent the legal right to cancel my license or have you, a third party, to do so. He's lying about this. He's mislead you about a supposed legal document. He has you doing something that is supposed to be legal to do, which is falsifying legal documents, etc.
The new DME Form, new as it was re-written after my first Discrimination Complaint changed who pays for the DME, is also illegal, it falsely informs the reader that the policy is legal and the Superintendent can do what he or she wants and those concerned must comply to the demand or comply under the threat of loosing one's license.
If the demand is legal then the 'request and consequence process' is bona fide and non - conformity to the request allows the license to be canceled. It's a request because if you do not want to drive one cannot be forced to comply.
If illegal like the diabetes policy, then the request is not a bona fide request, is it. It's a lie. It's an illegal demand with a threat used for compliance or conformity. This is what this new DME Form is for diabetics; it is a threat by the Superintendent, Martin, as he knows the policy is illegal, and he has mislead you and everyone else reading the DME Form.
Does he also threaten you, ICBC, for non - conformity?
Secondly, on the back side of the Form it mentions, as you do, that Section 29 “asks you to have an exam under Section 29 of the Motor Vehicle Act to verify you are fit to drive.” The demands of Section 29 have not been fulfilled and Martin and Howie know this, Hunt knows this, politicians know this, gov't knows this, and now you know this. No one has proved I'm unfit, therefore needing a phoney medical exam to prove I am fit. Having the “view” that I am unfit is not good enough to force me to undergo a phoney medical examination.
As stated above and in the Updated Consequences, the May 2010 Review accompanying this letter, my letters to the HRT, OSMV, the Gov't, RCMP, the UN Dept of Prevention of Genocide expose the policy is not legal. And as demonstrated with the HRT Decision, the demands of Section 29 have not been fulfilled and the policy is illegal. Martin, can only ask me to have an exam to verify I am fit to drive if he has proved I need to be treated as a liability and need examination. The exam must also be able to be able to do what it is alleged to be able to do and the Superintendent has not proved this. His intervention is not allowed to kill, maim, and endanger lives as Overcrowding proves and the need of myself to buy private surgery as now taxes are used to pay for an illegal demand upon the health care system that offer no Good, whereas if used for surgery the taxes would be for “medical necessities”, legal, and offer Good to society.
Now you know how corrupt Martin, Howie, those who wrote the DME Form, and their supporters are; they falsified a supposed legal document. They care nothing for the Constitution, Human Rights, the Motor Vehicle Act, their Oath of Office, Canada, or life itself. These people are monsters.
*


Harassment
Thomson, this demand that I complete the DME is Harassment, as the OSMV knows the DME cycle I am within.
As you seem not to know that the policy is illegal and run by the threat of me loosing my license I must assume you know nothing about the cycle of DME a diabetic must conform with. As a type 2 diabetic with a personal driver's license I am forced to undergo the DME every five (5) years. I underwent the DME last year and there have been No changes in my classification of type 2 diabetes; I use metformin and supplement my insulin production with an injectable insulin called Lantis. (A human insulin produced by recombinant DNA technology, in other words we construct it). So, why have they turned me into a type 1diabetic or someone that is not controlling their diabetes. I am not out of control. It is Martin, Howie, Hunt and other civil servants that are out of control. This is a lie concerning my Classification or Labeling as a diabetic driver. Harassment is a tool of those out of control.
This lie is the same kind of lie that another senior civil servant wrote about the policy, diabetics, and the disabled. Gary Martin, Assistant Deputy Minister in the Solicitor General's Office, wrote about the illegal policy, March 22, 2004, that “most importantly, it saves lives”. He is a liar and full of Hate. He did not justify the statement that I am a killer or that diabetic drivers kill at a rate more than non - diabetic drivers do. He did not prove the policy decreases that kill rate. He did not offer any documents to justify the policy. He is full of bias, hate, prejudice, ignorance, fear and loathing, disgust, and contempt for the diabetic and disabled.
He made a written statement that a Class of people, the diabetic, the disabled, are killers and that people like him are going to keep these killers under their rule, registered and classified in order to control these kinds of people.

This is what Nazis do. Just another civil servant that has put himself above the Laws of Canada and World Human Rights.
I didn't write this monster back as in doing so one would only accredit or endorse his Hate, Bias, and Discrimination. I wrote the Solicitor General, as this Politician supposedly manages the OSMV. Tony Heemskerk, A/Deputy Solicitor General, May 14, 2004, wrote that, after reviewing Martin's letter and my complaint about it wrote he is “satisfied that his letter was appropriate.”.
Nothing was offered to prove any of the above. It is not “appropriate” to classify a Class of people as killers. Heemskerk is also a liar and full of Hate and Discrimination.
As they state diabetics are killers, the most horrific statement we can write or say about a person, that I will take your Right to Life away. To say this with out proof and from their supposedly insulated position of civil servant, government, is not appropriate in any sense. Nazis do this so they can do what they want to do to the Class of people they Hate.
However, my statement that this policy kills is proved by the Emerge Overcrowding and Emerge Doctors holding NEWS conferences about the killings. It's proved by Coroner reports. It's proved by Death Certificates.
Martin, Howie, Hunt, and unknown others are responsible for the Overcrowding, as they know the policy harms the medical system, therefore people, and are in contact with the Ministry of Health and the BCMA about this. This means they have decided to balance their killing off with the believed killing diabetic drivers are doing; its ok if Martin, Howie, the OSMV, the politicians involved in this policy, and the anti-diabetic lobby kill this many, as in their “view” diabetics are killing this many; they balance off the killing with an illegal policy?
Don't forget, this is killing above the statistical even rate that non-diabetic and type 2s are involved in. Diabetics are supposed to have a higher rate of kill, not that they are not involved in driver mishaps where there is a death, fault or no fault. This is not documented that there is a difference in excess against the diabetic. Nor is it documented that diabetics are lower. Just that the diabetic is higher, so intervention is acceptable even if not legal? These are deaths that need to be documented, not just some “view” that it is happening.

So, what we have here is gov't Conscious Killing verses an Accidental Killing involving a diabetic driver? Not that the diabetic low blood sugar, or hypoglycemia, actually caused the accident or death. Maybe the Overcrowding caused it. Maybe the low blood sugar of the non - diabetic caused the accident. Conscious killing is not acceptable any where, especially by a Democratic government. Genocide compared to Accidental Death is not acceptable. And you wonder why they lie, mislead, misinform, steal, falsify legal documents, etc.

What Martin and Heemskerk have done is blame the diabetic for the killing, which hides the killing they are doing. Blame the other guy so you look at the diabetic, the right hand while not looking at the other hand which is holding an illegal policy and its consequences, the constructed killing of naïve bystanders.
This must be asked of these two and the people they support. What do they think of Jews? Are they dirty and unclean? Blacks are Niggers? Brown as Sub - Nigger? Orientals are Chinks, the yellow horde? Mexicans are wetbacks? Arabs are Sand - Niggers? Sikhs are rag-heads? Persians are what? First Nations People as Drunks and lazy? Etc, etc. This is the same discrimination and sick thinking that institutionalizes Discrimination and Hate. You think of meas a killer because they wrote that I am. They are senior civil servants writing about an illegal government policy, which they know is illegal, which is reinforcing the Discrimination and Hate.
Thomson, these men are the same kind of men that discriminate against women and construct a place for women to be. These men are monsters and just another example of the corruption surrounding this illegal policy against the diabetic and the disabled; people of difference. These are the monsters that help institutionalize discrimination for the monsters that dream up and run illegal policy that has horrific consequences for society, and gives them power.

This same demand for conformity to the DME of an arbitrary DME raised its ugly head a number of years ago when I changed my license classification from Class 4 to a Class 6, a Private driver classification. The Class 4 for taxi, small passenger vehicle, and small school bus demanded I undergo the DME every two years. I complained about this demand and it was resolved. That was, supposedly, a mistake. The second time is Harassment. Once is enough especially since my investigation and complaint into this matter has not been resolved and I continue to fight for my Charter Rights, Human Rights, Rights under the Motor Vehicle Act, and have publicly challenged the Superintendent, Deputy, and others about their corruption and killing.
I recently wrote the new Solicitor General about this Discrimination, de Yong, after Kash Heed resigned the second time. However, he transferred to be the Attorney General without responding, which Heed did. I wrote Heed as the S G Office and OSMV has had two years since the HRT changed the scope of my complaint giving the OSMV an unreasonable time to legalize the Policy. Two years was enough time, as they have had 30 years plus to write a Policy and justify it with science. I wrote and informed the S G that the policy was illegal and killed people. S G Heed, actually responded, but he wrote that his staff informed him that my concerns had been resolved. His staff lied to him that the Discrimination Complaint and lack of Policy, and that my inquiry had been resolved. I wrote him back and told him his staff lied to him. Heed did not attend to this, as he forced to resign the second time. So, I sent a letter of complaint similar to this with the Updated Consequences and my Reviews of how the OSMV has procrastinated, lied, stolen documents, falsified documents, breached the Affidavit, etc to the new S G, de Jong, Nov 12, 2010, who did not return or acknowledge my letter of complaint about this. He buried it; he only wants Democracy on his terms and won't fight for it. And now he's the A G with Hunt telling him how to dance, now he wants to be Liberal Leader and run to be the Premier of BC, which he just lost. He does have the professionalism, social conscience, political strength and grit to fulfill the demands of the Charter, the HR Code, the MVA, and to take to task the civil servants that have broken their Oath of Office and he wants to run BC. He's afraid to stand up for Democracy when it counts, he's a week democrat, afraid to work hard for Democracy; he wants a pretend Democracy like Tunisia and Egypt were. Not good enough. And he's still the A G. What's he going to do as he left this mess for the next S G. Pass the buck.
I do not what to say about the new S G, Coleman, as when he was S G years ago he approved a co-authored letter between the Ministry of Health and the OSMV which stated the policy was only based upon Howie's and some unknown civil servants “view” that they can do this policy. The question for him is did the civil servants that wrote the letter for him inform him Howie had not fulfilled the demands of the Charter, the HR Code, and the MVA? And that they had broken their Oath of Office buy running this policy knowing it was illegal and killing people? Do you really think they informed him what they were really doing? Do you think the senior civil servants that lied to Heed are lying to Coleman now? Do you think these same civil servants will lie to Coleman again?
What about the past/present Minister of Health Services, Falcon, who also wants to be leader and Premier, which he just lost. His office is involved in this as his office accepted the demand upon the medical system and G Ps. Falcon has not made changes to the Emerge Overcrowding and deaths, long wait times for bona fide surgery, long wait times to see a GP, Emerge admittance instead of through a Specialist or GP, GP leaving the GP profession, etc. All because he won't review the demands of the gov't itself upon the health care system, like this illegal policy. He's blaming the health care problems upon the Public and refusing to acknowledge the Government's demands and illegal demands. Pass the buck.
What about Abbot who was also a past Min of Health and he wants to rule, and he just lost. Again, politicians who do not want to fight for Democracy and Rights or confront staff and civil servants that do not fulfill their Oaths of Office nor the demands of our Charter, the HR Code, and the MVA. And these guys want to rule. The failure of these politicians to confront this Discrimination, illegal policy, Hate, killing, etc is Harassment, as they have put themselves above those they represent and look down upon them, and turn me invisible, something they do not need to see, therefore deal with.
*

The Threat
Again, the Threat to have my license canceled for non-compliance is only a legal tool or instrument to be used if the demand is legal; a consequence, that's all. The Policy is not legal therefore the demand is not legal, therefore it is not a bona fide legal instrument to control non - compliance but a Criminal Threat because the Superintendent, Martin, and the Deputy Superintendent, Howie, know the policy is illegal. They use their position of status, trust, power, and prestige to threaten people and mislead the public; especially threaten people like me that challenge them for good reason. There is a real difference between the two actions and this is a criminal threat, an act done to harm for non – compliance to personal Discrimination and Hate. An act to keep people like me in their constructed place for me; the Pariah, the Other, the Nigger, one without Rights, Value, and Worth.
Thomson, you have been used to enforce this threat. You are used as the third party to try and put the Superintendent and Deputy Superintendent at arms length from their criminal behaviour. You are their Scapegoat.
*

The Scapegoat
You are used as the Scapegoat for their lies, harm, maiming, killing, misinformation, misleading information, breach of the Charter, the HR Code, and their own Motor Vehicle Act, and their Oath of Office. You have been turned into a Nazi Goon for Martin and Howie and the other corrupt civil servants and cowardly politicians. You are being used to keep Martin and Howie at arms length from their corruption. Used as the OSMV has done many times in my Inquiry and Discrimination Complaints since 2002 into their illegal policy and its horrific consequences. Used as the CLAS lawyer was used as the scapegoat for not renewing or making an amendment to the breached Crown Settlement Agreement and all the other charades they have played, mentioned above. Used by having you see the right hand, their charade, while the left hand is really what is being played out, an illegal policy. Hunt, Supervising Counsel for the Attorney General's office, is charade writer, where you and we, the public, are not to know we are in a charade and discover you are the scapegoat. Just another slippery and slimy charade from Hunt, eh.
Thomson, what do you do now? You use the RCMP or local police to charge me; they're the goon for you. You are being played again with this action. To put you at arms length from any responsibility and accountability. Done to put Martin and Howie more steps away from their criminal activity.
How do you now feel now you know you are used as the scapegoat for an illegal policy and its Genocide?
*

The Nigger, Genocide: Democide, large numbers of the public killed by gov't policy.
Once again, I am not their Nigger and I am not your Nigger. A Nigger is a person with no Rights, a person who is constructed as the Pariah, the Other, someone with no value and worth as Human. A person like me according to Martin, Howie, Hunt, and other unknown civil servants involved in this. And politicians who have buried this.
A person like Brian Sinclair, deceased, Sept 2008. His death is a working example of the deaths in Emerge Overcrowding, a person that was turned invisible by the consequences of government policy and Canadian bias, prejudice, hate, ignorance, fear and loathing, contempt, and disgust toward First Nations People and the disabled. He was a First Nations person, double amputee, wheel-chaired with catheters that were infected and was sent to a Winnipeg Emerge for help. He died in Emerge, this was after 34 hrs of being there, of not being attended to. He was turned invisible. I don't know if he lost his legs due to complications of diabetes or even if he had diabetes, the Press did not mention this, but diabetes is epidemic within First Nations People. He was disabled, that's all, and his Right to Care and Right to Equality, Right for Inclusion, and Right to Life were not given. He was treated like a Nigger. Something with no value and worth.
There is an Investigation into this by the Winnipeg Chief of Police and and Inquest and Inquiry to follow. I sent the Updated Consequences, the two Reviews I have mentioned above, and my Deconstruction of the presentation of stolen research documents to exemplify the corruption and mass murder I have found myself within. I also contacted the Press who were/are covering this, the Chief of the Assembly of First Nations, and the lawyers involved, as there is a second unexplained Emerge death of another First Nations person , and a person with brain damage alleged to have happened due to the Overcrowding. These people need to know what is and what has happened to me, as there is similar polices in Manitoba, with the same senior civil servants prepared to lie and deceive about what they are really doing.
At least now the Chief of Police, the Assembly of First Nations and counsel will have knowledge about how the gov't makes illegal demands upon the health care system that they don't acknowledge, therefore manage, that causes the Emerge Overcrowding, problems with Ambulatory Care, long waits for surgery, long waits to visit a G P, etc, etc. Now they will know of another consequence of this illegal policy, your canceling of my license for no Good reason. That you have also been deceived by the civil servants involved and turned into their Nazi goon.
So, what kind of documents did you, ICBC, sign under false pretenses?
How many licenses have you, ICBC, canceled and should not have?
How many disabled are not driving and now being excluded from Inclusion and Equality in our Democratic Society?
What consequence did this have on those disabled people?
*


Previous contacts
Thomson, I have contacted other people and organizations, as what I have found myself within needs witness' whether they are involved or a third party. I have contacted the RCMP, Superintendent Burnside and Commissioner Elliot in Ottawa, rather than local RCMP because the stolen research and breach of Affidavit is movement from province to province, and the stolen research is world wide, which makes the crimes Federal, and the RCMP's Copyright Dept is in Ottawa. Again, at this time in Canada's development it seems the owners of the research need to file complaints, how insane is that.
However, the RCMP have not contacted me about this illegal policy and its consequences, the breached Affidavits, Provincial mail fraud, inter-provincial mail fraud, fraudulently using our taxes to pay for an illegal policy, therefore fraudulent demand upon the Medical System, falsifying legal documents, lying to the HRT, corruption of the BC HRT, breach of their Oath of Office, breach of the Charter, the HR Code, and the MVA, the killing, the maiming, the endangerment to life, Hate, etc. And now your involvement and actions have me reading the Criminal Code, to which I find myself involved in Harassment, Treason, Hate;Propaganda, and Prohibited Acts and your Harassment and your signing legal documents under false pretenses, which seems to have given you some kind of legal right to cancel my license and more. So, it is again falsifying documents as was done in the Scope Changes etc.
As this involves the Solicitor General's Office, the Supervising Counsel for the Attorney General's Office, the new Attorney General, the Ministry of Health Services and Politicians that have turned their backs on this I imagine the RCMP are quietly doing their investigation, why I don't know. The gov't has labeled me a killer and liability so I don't understand why they are not interrogating Hunt, Martin, and Howie publicly, what is good for them is good enough to do to them. To keep this quiet is unbelievable as these civil servants should be able to stand up in public and state they are following the law and their Oath of Office. I imagine the killing is so great the RCMP and others are trying to bury this. The RCMP know the Emerge Overcrowding and deaths are happening every day due to the influence of this illegal policy, but they, as others have come to realize as this is happening in BC it is happening in All Canada and the killing really in Genocide; Democide. And Canada is scolding Libya for killing its own people and yet we are Cowards when it comes to exposing the same killing and corruption at home.
(March 2, 2011, CTV National and Local NEWS reported the Royal Columbian Hospital Emerge took clients to the local Tim Horton's and stacked them there because the Emerge was Overcrowded and Ambulances could not deliver their clients to the Emerge. And you wonder why everyone I contact is afraid to inquiry about gov't demands upon the disabled and gov't demands upon the UHCS.)

RCMP Commissioner Elliot is retiring in a few months. One would think that his one last act for Canada would be to expose this corruption, killing, illegal policy, etc and defend Canada from corrupt civil servants and cowardly politicians. Or do you think he will do his best to bury Genocide in Canada? And yet we send RCMP to countries that have/are experiencing Crimes against Humanity, Genocide, and Atrocities.

As you, ICBC, are now involved in this, moves my inquiry and complaints out of Human Rights complaints, I reviewed the BC Criminal Code to see where this has moved into. I imagine the illegal policy and its killing, the Genocide, the stolen research to justify the policy, the sending of this material through the mail, mail fraud, corrupt civil servants, breach of a Crown settlement agreement and not renewing it means Hunt, Martin, Howie and other civil servants involved are engaged in “Treason” and other “Prohibited Acts”, which are not something they seem to want to make public, as it is awkward and embarrassing, as we are in Canada. This is what Hunt is really doing, she broke a Crown Settlement Agreement, never renewed it on purpose, did not fulfill the demands of the Crown and is running this policy in opposition to the demands of the Crown, as the Crown demands everyone to follow the demands of the Charter, the Human Rights Code, the Motor Vehicle Act, and their Oath of Office, and the demands of the Criminal Code, which as Supervising counsel for the Attorney General's Office Hunt knows, and is playing a charade of misinform, mislead, lying, stonewalling, covering up illegal policy, killing, maiming, endangerment to life, falsifying documents, Treason, Hate, Prohibited Act, etc. This defines Treason and Prohibited Acts against the Crown. Martin and Howie are just as guilty.
Thomson, how do you feel about being woken up to being part of the illegal policy, Genocide, corruption, hate, discrimination, treason, etc? Or do you know all this already? Do you know the policy is illegal?

How do you feel that you personally have been used by these liars, thieves, murders, and now traitors?

I have also contacted the United Nations Dept of Prevention of Genocide, the world organization 'Human Rights Watch', Concordia University's Genocide Dept, and others listed in the May 2010 Review, which is enclosed. I will send this to the RCMP, the UN, and others, as witness to your involvement, whether as a naïve bystander or partner in murder and Genocide; it's now your and ICBC's choice. And to the new Solicitor General to see what he will do, as he is not running to be Liberal leader or Premier, and he was involved in 2004. Interesting he returns six years later and nothing has been done legally or to legalize the policy or cancel the policy and all the while it kills, maims and endangers lives and the people involved have continued to break their Oath of Office, the Charter, the HR Code, and the Motor Vehicle Act.

As this Inquiry and Discrimination complaints have now moved into the world of Harassment, more falsifying of legal documents with ICBC and your actions, and the acts of Treason and Prohibited Acts I must also send a copy of this letter to all involved, as the behaviour of Hunt, Martin, Howie, and others has escalated to something new.
Every day this policy runs the criminals involved escalate their criminal behaviour as now they are Harassing me. The above story exemplified how they have escalated their criminal behaviour, from 2002 to present, as Canada seems to be afraid of them and the horror of their actions. And don't forget, every day the Emerge facilities are Overcrowded by illegal gov't demands and people are dying, being maimed, and having their lives endangered by corrupt civil servants and cowardly politicians and their lust for blood, corruption, and power.
They really do fulfill the Seven Deadly Sins don't they; wrath, greed, sloth, pride, lust, envy, and gluttony.
*

Now you know
Now you know that this policy is illegal, these civil servants are abusing you also, you have become their Nigger also.
So what are you going to do? Cancel my license and be part of their Corruption, lies, falsifying of documents, theft, Perjury, bias, prejudice, Hate, ignorance (not any more), fear and loathing, contempt, disgust, harassment, Genocide, Treason, and Prohibited Acts?
Reinstate my license and go against what you believed to be the Law and Right thing? So, you will need to break the law yourself? How can it be law if it is illegal to begin with.
How's it feel to wake up to this corruption and murder? Are you going to join the rest of the Cowards in Canada?

Thomson, again, you have no legal right to cancel my license. I want it reinstated until these criminals fulfill the Five Steps of Engagement, the real steps they need to fulfill the Charter, the HR Code, the MVA, and their Oath of Office; presented in the 'Updated Consequences'.
To prove a Need for the Policy, and not with stolen scientific research.
Prove the intervention can do what it is alleged to be able to do.
Acknowledges the consequences of the policy.
Prove Good.
Acknowledge that people like me visit a doctor twenty (20) times for diabetes compared to the one ( 1 ) G P visit I am forced to comply with under the illegal policy. Why do you think Hunt, Howie, and Martin cannot acknowledge this fact?
These liars, thieves, killers, traitor civil servants and corrupt politicians have had long enough to change the policy, and they have not. I do not need to be their good little Nigger and dance to their Discrimination, bias, prejudice, hate, ignorance, fear and loathing, disgust, and contempt in order to drive.

Canada is still a Democracy whether or not these monsters, in their “view”, think it is not and just a playground for their personal twisted “view” of life.
*

Conclusion
The above is for you to understand what is really happening concerning the illegal diabetes policy and how you have been mislead and misinformed about type 2 and driving.
About how you have been mislead to sign documents that empower you to cancel licenses.
The above exemplifies how the civil servants involved will lie to you in your inquiry about how I and 500 000 other diabetics and disabled drivers have been treated.
About how the public is lied to about diabetes and policy.
This is needed for when you make inquiries they already know you know they are liars, thieves, murders, and traitors.








RCMP Elliot and Burnside: I Accuse

Commissioner Elliot and Superintendent Burnside you have not made this public, as of yet, or contacted me about the illegal policy and other matters concerning this. Are you burying this?
You have only informed me that you do not have the feeling you could win with charges against these people involved with the theft of science and the breach of Copyright, Intellectual Property Rights, and Intent of Use. (Hunt, Howie, Iyer, and Dobbs, and Howie's manager Martin).
(The other players and unknown players are Gary Martin, Heemskerk, who have lied about the policy and buried their killing with lying that the policy saves lives, blaming the diabetic as killer, knowing full well the killing consequences of their illegal policy, (they are murders by association and covering it up), the unknowns in the Min of Health Services and BCMA that support this illegal policy that medical Dr. Ballem makes reference to, those in the Core Services Review that support this policy, which is illegal and never proved to do any Good and yet Gary Martin states they have evaluated the illegal policy to see if the program is;
“appropriately delivered by government and affordable. It was determined that the medical review program was appropriately part of government's core services.”

This means they know that the policy is illegal and the demand upon the Universal Health Care System and G Ps who are forced to give the DME. Do they really believe taking 30 - 40 G Ps out of service for a medical examination that has not been proved to do what it is alleged to be able to do is appropriate and affordable? Those that wait 5 - 7 days to see a G P do not think it appropriate; they go to Emerge. Those G Ps forced to give the DME do not think it appropriate and affordable. The 400 G Ps, 10% of G Ps out of service, out of real medical service to fulfill the demands of illegal policies do not think it appropriate and affordable. These are “yes men” that work behind closed doors and get paid well to turn their heads and do what someone tells them to do. These are people that need to be in public view, with charges, as they took the money and lied about the policy, its “appropriately delivered and affordability” and its horrific consequences.
(Those politicians such as de Yong, the new A G, that just buried my complaint when he was the last S G, the past Min of Health, such as Falcon who did not object to the illegal policy that makes false demands upon the Health Care System and has 10% of G P disappear from service, and past Solicitor Generals who did not fire Martin and Howie for running an illegal policy, breaking a Crown Settlement Agreement, and falsifying the Oath of Affidavit, etc.)

Commissioner Elliot and Superintendent Burnside
You have not responded to my request of charges against the people listed above for breach of Oath of Affidavit or whatever other laws are concerned when these people present an Affidavit and the content is stolen. You know it is stolen as it was withdrawn when I challenged them. If not challenged the policy would have been falsely legally justified and it is not. Your staff lawyers are liars concerning the not winning of charges against Howie, Hunt, Martin, Iyer, and Dobbs. They should have been exposed for what they are and what they did, in court and Press conferences.
2. You have not responded to my request to have these people charged with inter - provincial and provincial mail fraud as the Affidavit was sent from Alberta to British Columbia, and then from Vancouver to Nanaimo. This is also falsifying legal documents, perjury, and more.
3. The lie about not knowing the scope was done to defend their actions concerning the stolen documents, which in turn proves they are defending their illegal or criminal behaviour. Lying to change legal documents is how many charges?
4. The lie changed the scope, a legal document, which was then changed back again by the HRT without my permission. Were Hunt, Iyer, Howie, and Martin involved in this? Someone had to be for the HRT to break its established absolute protocol for changing scope and contacting all those involved.
5. You have not acknowledged the policy is illegal? Why? How can you not respond to me about this?
6. You have not responded that you are investigating the in ordinate number of deaths in Emerge, the Deaths the Emerge doctors hold Press conferences about, like the death of Sinclair in Winnipeg, and Martin, Howie know this about their policy.
7. You have not responded to my complaint that my taxes are now used to pay for the demands of an illegal policy, which shortfalls taxes for surgery, which forced me to buy private spinal surgery. This is fraud and more as the people that made the change to who pays for the driver's medical examination knew the policy was illegal and the medical examination fee change was due to my Discrimination Complaint about this very thing, illegal policy and I had to pay for the DME that had not been proved to be able to do what it is alleged to be able to do. All involved have lied, misinformed, misrepresented, and mislead about the legality of the Policy, therefore also broke their Oath of Office.
8. You have not responded to me about how my Charter Rights have not been addressed. This is not a Charter Challenge. I agree with the Charter that gov't can come into my life, but as the Charter of Rights and Freedoms states gov't Needs bona fide reason and it better be explained to all with documents so All can read about the need and the Good that comes from it, so it can be challenged if need be. There “view” that it is ok to do the policy is not good enough. They stole scientific documents, letter, books etc in an illegal effort to do this and you do not have the guts to challenge these Criminals, these Nazis, these Traitors. They mislead, misrepresented, misinformed, lied, stole, and lied again concerning their behaviour concerning the Charter demands. I asked why Howie and Martin have not fulfilled the demands of the Charter. Why they have not acknowledged I have Charter Rights. Why they act as if I do not have Charter Rights. They have put themselves above the demands of the Crown.
This is not just me. It's now 10 % of our society and how many when you add the other 100 medical conditions that Howie and Martin say they manage; 500 000 people, disabled people, that have had their Charter Rights stomped upon, not acknowledged as worthwhile giving by these Nazis. And you aren't investigating this? Our Constitution Rights come before your protection of corrupt civil servants and cowardly politicians.
9. You have not responded to how my Human Rights have not been addressed. Martin and Howie know of this, as the OSMV is in front of the HRT all the time. They do not acknowledge that Canada gives, acknowledges Human Rights; they are not naïve bystanders here but absolute corrupt humans. They have put themselves above the demands of the Crown.
10. You have not responded to me about the OSMV, Martin and Howie, not fulfilling the demands of the Sections of the MVA they quote, as giving them unrestricted, arbitrary power to do what they are doing; this is just another lie of theirs and Hunt, the Supervising lawyer for the Attorney General's office. This is Treason, as they are running an illegal policy against the demands of the Crown, misleading All that the policy is legal and offers Good. They have put themselves above the demands of the Crown and run their so-called laws.
11. You have not acknowledged that these civil servants have broken their Oath of Office, which is to Obey the Law, Do Not Kill, Do Not Harm, Do Not Steal, Do Not Lie, Do Not Mislead, Do Not Misrepresent, Do Not Misinform, etc, where these values have all been broken.
12. You have not acknowledged that Hunt had Lisa Lee, a gov't lawyer, wrongly, with purpose misquoted the MVA to have readers believe the Superintendent has Carte Blanch to do what he or she wants to do. Whereas the Statutes are very clear the Superintendent must prove a Need and prove Good for all to read and evaluate. The people that crafted the MVA did so in order that Authoritarians, Fascists, and Nazis do not run the civil service and gov't; to keep the monsters at arms length. So that monsters such as Martin and Howie do not do what they are doing. So, people like Hunt do not run people like Lee, keeping herself at arms length from wrong doing. These statutes are also there so Marting and Howie can protect themselves from outside influences, such as Hunt, which they have chosen not to do.
13. You have not acknowledged that the New DME Form is illegal and purposely contrived to mislead the readers about its power and legality. It is written as if the Policy is legal and that the DME is a bona medical examination which it is not.
Secondly, on the back of the Form the demands of Section 29 have not been fulfilled. The stolen research was presented to do this, as well as fulfill the Charter and HR Code but I caught them stealing didn't I. Therefore the demands of Section 29 have not been fulfilled and Martin and Howie know this, so do those that re - wrote the DME Form. All concerned with this lie have broken their Oath of Office and more. They have put themselves above the demands of the Crown.
14. You have not attended to the corruption surrounding Insurance Fraud concerning Death and Maiming due to the Overcrowding in Emerge, caused by these illegal gov't policies. Concerning Extended Care costs due to the harm caused by the Overcrowding in Emerge, caused by these illegal gov't policy. Whereas, as the gov't caused the problem, not the Public, the gov't should be taking responsibility and held accountable for their actions and consequences.
15. You have not attended to the Fraud concerning the $5 to $7 000 000 used to pay for this illegal policy. And when extrapolated to include the other medical conditions at only $1 000 000 each this means $100 000 000 tax dollars shuffled to pay for illegal DME. This charade by these criminals endangered my life, where I needed to buy private health care, as so many have needed to do, and others become maimed or have lost the life waiting for surgery, and others become addicted to medical drugs waiting up to two years for bona fide surgery, where taxes are diverted to the Solicitor General's office to make illegal demands upon the Universal Health Care System. Death and maiming due to indifference to Human life. Reckless endangerment to Human life. And more.
16. You have not attended to the fact of Genocide; Democide, large number of deaths caused by gov't policy, and an illegal gov't policy at that. Canada is condemning Libya's Gaddafi for shooting upon his own citizens, how do you think he controlled the country before; well wishes? What do you think these civil servants and corrupt politicians are doing with these illegal policies? They don't use a gun, they use illegal policy and their position of status, trust, power, and prestige to mislead, misinform, and misrepresent, just as monsters like Gaddafi have.
17. You have not attended to the allegation of Hate. How else do we interpret the behaviour of these civil servants if not Hate? Why do they keep doing this knowing the policy is illegal and killing, denigrating my character, turning me into the Pariah, the Other, the Nigger, other that Hate.
*

And you two don't have the courage and legal drive to investigate this? What is happening here is the absolute opposite of what Canada is. Of what we inform the world we are. Of what my uncle and father fought for. What Bosnian Blue Hats fought and died for. What Rwanda Blue Hats fought for. What Afghan troops are fighting and dying for. What Canada's UN Blue Hat Peace Keepers have fought for. My father was also a Blue Hat Peace Keeper, and he did this so you two can enjoy Canada and not have the guts to stand up for Canada? Both of you should be fired or resign.

There 'should Not' be the tiniest, slightest glimmer of inappropriateness concerning a gov't policy that may be legal little lone an illegal policy, little lone a policy that Harms as Martin, Howie, Hunt, and others know really does Harm. Or that the demands of the Charter Rights, Human Rights Code, or the Motor Vehicle Act have not been fulfilled. Or that civil servants have not fulfilled their Oath of Office. Or the deaths of the inordinate number of people dying in Overcrowded Emerge facilities has not been investigated as the S G and the A G offices have known about my allegations for eight years and have not investigated the unexplained deaths, other than the blame of Overcrowding. Where do they think the Overcrowding in the Emerge facilities comes from as it is not just the problem of one Emerge. They've read my Discrimination complaints and Updated Consequences and decided to bury this as I think you are doing.
*

Commissioner Elliot, you are retiring for whatever reasons, they are not my business but it seems you have chosen to do so, as you did not just quit last month. So, why don't you do something for Canada. Do something for the Disabled. Do something for the Public. Do something for the RCMP and confront this policy and its corrupt civil servants and politicians. Change Canada back to what it should be, a bona fide Democracy, not run by the “view” of some criminal civil servants.
Secondly, Commissioner, you were appointed by the Prime Minister, a Conservative, and the basic tenant of Conservativism is; less Government within the Public's life the better Canada will be. That intervention into the Public realm must be Needed, legally justified, so all can see why and challenge the premises if needed. So, by not attending to this absolute of Conservativism you break with Conservativism and the Prime Minister's mandate of his interpretation of Democracy and one large number of other Canadians, Conservative as well as Liberal Democrats.
Third, by not assaulting this illegal policy and the corrupt civil servants means you're turning your back to illegal and criminal behaviour. It doesn't matter how horrific you stand up. You have no choice.
Fourth, if you do not expose and charge these civil servants this means you also have not fulfilling your Oath of Office, which is to Obey the Law, Do not kill, harm, lie, steal, mislead, misrepresent, misinform, etc.
Fifth, Hunt just cost us, society, the Public, $18 000 000 defending two civil servants that for some reason after eight years of court cost, declared themselves guilty of breach of Oath of Office and selling insider information. The Press also stated that there is the cost of the RCMP. These civil servants are no different. That's not true is it. These one's run an illegal policy and know it, know the horrific consequences of killing, maiming, endangerment to human life, and absolutely know they create the diabetic as the Pariah, the Other, and the Nigger. These civil servants are monsters not just two looking for a quick buck. These people love the crime, the blood and guts, death and their power over you as you are groveling to them, doing what they want you to do.
There should be no hesitation on your behalf to make this public with charges and the demand to cancel the policy due to the known harm it causes, the known harm admitted to by the letter from the Min of Health Services and the OSMV.
Sixth, as you and your staff have come to realize,as this is being played out in BC, it is also being played out in All of Canada, such as with the Sinclair death that is being investigated. The numbers of those being killed and maimed must be horrific. This is why I contacted the Chief of Police in Winnipeg, the local Press covering the story, the First Nation People, and the lawyers involved. This is going to come out and people are going to ask you, the Commissioner and a Superintendent why you buried this complaint.
Hopefully, the Chief of Police and the lawyers involved will 'summon' you to explain why you have not made this public? Because this influences that Investigation.

So, if your counsel is saying it is too late to do anything just tell them to get stuffed and fire them for covering up Canada's worst corruption and criminal behaviour since the deliberate spreading of disease to the First Nations Peoples, rounding 'them' up and placing them in Concentration Camps, oh my mistake, Reserves. And then sicking religious zealots upon them to crush their language and culture, little lone use 'them' as Sex toys.
It's all coming back upon Canada, isn't it. Those wrongs have been exposed but it's still here, as the Sinclair death proves. The trouble is the monsters have died and the perverts are not really penalized are they.
Commissioner, 10% of society is supposed to be diabetic, in Canada that is 3 300 000 people. You are not going to stand up for this many people in Canada that have had their Charter Rights stomped on, eliminated, by corrupt civil servants that have put themselves above the Rules and Laws of Canada? Are you kidding me?
As that First Nations horror has and is still being brought forward, so will this horror and corrupt civil servants, except this time the monsters are still here to penalize.
Commissioner, are you and Burnside and your counsel burying this. You are not allowed to. That is why I keep other people and the Press, writing people as witness', as sooner or later something like the Sinclair death will expose this; and now you are involved in that Investigation.
And now ICBC is involved in this investigation, Hate, Discrimination, Treason, breach of charter Rights, Human Rights, MVA, Oath of Office, murder, maiming, endangerment to life, fraud, mail fraud, breach of Affidavit, etc, etc. And every other criminal chargers good lawyers, lawyers for Canada, can think of.
*

What Commissioner Elliot will be Known For, Remembered As; your Legacy.
You will be remembered as the RCMP Commissioner that was appointed by the PM and had no RCMP experience. Known for conflict with the senior RCMP staff. Remembered for not making the changes the PM and the RCMP need to be the police force of our new technology age. Remembered for retiring before your term concludes. Remembered for burying the “Killing Fields” of Canada, our Genocide, our Democide. For not fulfilling your Oath of Office. For not confronting civil servants that have not fulfilled their Oath of Office. For not confronting civil servants that have stripped 10% of society, and this is only for diabetes, of their Charter Rights. Of their Human Rights. Of their Rights under the Motor Vehicle Act. Of not standing up for our Universal Health Care System, as the illegal policy wreaks havoc upon the UHCS.
Commissioner, these senior staff you are arguing with may be a problem for you, but they are nothing compared to what I have discovered myself within., and I've been at this since 2002. This is my Human Rights, my Charter Rights that I am fighting for. I'll never give up. Why should I? I've done nothing wrong. You gave up? These senior staff are not killers, thieves, liars, Traitors, etc, etc, etc. So, your fight and un - approachability, un - accommodating, and un - compromising sees you quiting and the RCMP not moving forward in this technological century. What will you fight for?
This is what you want for a Legacy. Just another Canadian that doesn't have the guts to stand up for Canada? For our Charter of Rights and Freedoms? For our world recognition of Human Rights? You won't stand up for this?
*

Timelines
Although there is a timeline beginning with me, my diagnosis of type 2 and first DME in 1999, which seems beyond a reasonable timeline for complaints, all this must be done as there are No Limits to Undetermined Deaths. We hunt Murders and unexplained deaths for ever and we should. 'Undetermined deaths' as Emerge doctors and the survivors of those deaths will testify. As death to Overcrowding really does not explain these deaths Emerge doctors are complaining about.
Secondly, as the HRT changed the scope of my complaint, in other words they gave the OSMV an indefinite time to produce a legal Policy, this time supposedly based upon bona fide legal use of Science, means my Discrimination complaint is still in the works, still active as the diabetic policy within the HRT scope can still be challenged if the policy is ever made public. So the original complaint of 2004 – 2006, or my Inquiry into the Policy 2002 - 2004 is the date we begin, or from the initial DME in 1999 as Howie and gov't knew the policy was illegal at that time, therefore they were breaking their Oath of Office then, as well as my Charter Rights, the HR Code, and the statutes of the MVA. Or this can go back to the revised MVA of 1996 or before as a date to investigate deaths in Emerge that are not explained other than the unexplained Overcrowding in Emerge.
*

New Charges against these people
New charges of Harassment concerning the false demand that I become their little Nigger and dance around on a stick and under go another phoney medical examination just because they want to make me dance.
Charges of Treason as they are running this policy against the demands of the Crown. Treason as they did not renew or make an amendment to the breached settlement agreement.
Charges of lying to ICBC about the legality of the policy, that the policy is legal therefore ICBC has the legal power to cancel license; more falsifying of legal documents. Is ICBC really a naïve bystander, as I was, as the public is, concerning this policy and its consequences?

Regards


Dave Jenkins

Recent New Previous Contacts by letter and will get a copy of this.
Francis M. Deng, UN Secretary General's Special Advisor on the Prevention of Genocide
RCMP Commissioner Elliot, Ottawa
Superintendent Burnside, RCMP, Ottawa
Chief of Police, Winnipeg
Human Rights Watch
Montreal Institute For Genocide and Human Rights Studies
others are listed in the May 2010 Review and others in the May 2009 review online at 2diabetes.blogspot.com
*

New Contacts by letter
Mark Rovere, Associate Director of Health Policy, The Fraser Institute, as his new study again discovered there are no changes to Emerge Overcrowding, long wait times to for surgery and to see a G P, etc. I asked him, “Why he does not acknowledge that there are only two users entities using the UHCS, the Public and Government? Why is it only the Public that needs to fulfill the “medical necessary” demand to have access to UHCS? Why is it that the Press, academics, and he do not acknowledge and evaluate the Governments demands upon the UHCS? As with the diabetes policy, the funding comes from the S G Office, is theft, and used to marry the S G with the Min of Health to mislead that the Policy is legal as why would the S G pay $5 000 000 for a diabetes policy if not legal and did not offer any Good and another $50 or $100 000 000 for the other 100 or so medical conditions is states it manages? The diabetic policy, all disabled policy is not covered by UHCS, as it is not a “medical necessity”, but the demand upon the doctors is still there and if not acknowledged this debit of 35 - 40 G Ps, just for diabetes, is not known and G Ps just disappear and are unaccounted for. Then add all the G Ps taken out of service to do the other 100 medical conditions that are monitored but probably do not need to be, as the people are already visiting their doctor as diabetics are. He has not responded to me.
Rovere works for The Fraser Institute, therefore a Conservative, so why hasn't he attacked and exposed gov't demands upon the UHCS?

R. T. (Rich) Coleman, (you get a copy of this, the Updated Consequences, and the May 2010 Review, as your staff lied to Heed and have probably lost the exact letters sent to him
Our new Solicitor General, you get a copy because I have been inquiring about this since 2002 - 2004, with the OSMV, while you were S G in 2004. At that time you responded to me, February 17, 2004, about a letter that was from the Min of Health Services, Deputy Penny Ballem, MD, April 4, 2003 that was supposed to be a co - authored letter between the OSMV and the Min of Health concerning the Legality and Cost of the policy and its Consequences. As the letter from Ballem does not refer to the OSMV at all, I inquired why the OSMV had not responded to my inquiry about the legality and cost of the policy and its consequences; I had sent two letters out asking about the policy. So, you wrote me back to inform me the letter was indeed a co - authored letter between the OSMV and the Min of Health Services.
Ballem's letter is important as it states;
“I regret that I am unable to provide you statistical information regarding the incidence of motor vehicle accidents which involve diabetic drivers. My understanding is that no clear data exists either in Canada, the US, or Britain at the present time.”

This was my point exactly; the research I read from 1999 - 2003 debunks the fear that diabetics are having more driver mishaps than non - diabetic drivers. It is not that she could not ask permission for the research to use but as the Deputy Minister and a practicing Medical Doctors she could not find any science to prove the policy as needed.
Again, Howie, the Deputy Superintendent of Motor Vehicles, (the person that manages driver policy) February 27, 2004 wrote to me after the letter from Ballem;
“It is my understanding there is no ongoing data gathered on the incidence of accidents caused by or involving diabetic drivers.”

This is my point exactly, there isn't any science, data, bona fide information to prove the policy as needed; “So why do it?”

Solicitor General, I had referred Howie to the science I had read concerning type 2 and driving, which debunks the fear and loathing of diabetic drivers and and drives the lies that diabetic drivers are a liability and need management by a phoney medical examination. She knows the science debunks her fears and hatred of the diabetic and disabled. This research was from the most prolific and respected diabetes researchers in the world; no one has challenged their research results and that was in 2002 and 2003. If you look hard for type 2 driving mishaps there is very little done concerning this, as today it is understood that the perceived or contrived problem with type 2 is non – existent, so it doesn't warrant the research, which is Copyright protected, Intellectual Property Rights Protected, and Intent of Use Protected as the owners have come to fully understand the consequences of gov't intervention and the harm it does to medial systems.
If you find difference in old research or research involving type 2 or hypoglycemia, pre 2000, it is probably science that has diabetes or hypoglycemia, as a second thought of the research, something that someone needed to Publish on, or to just Publish to keep their job, or something that could be used the next time the researcher or professor needed to publish.
Secondly, that research differences in driver mishaps have also been discovered to be so insignificant that it is not worthwhile for more research and intervention especially when the intervention labels the type 2 as a liability, a killer, a Pariah, the Other, and the Nigger, and forced to undergo phoney medical examinations that cannot do what they are alleged to be able to do. Martin and Howie know this.
Again, Howie's academic researcher, hired to write the Driver's Policy as there never was one, Dobbs, stole the research, put in an Affidavit, to mislead about the legality of Use, and presented it in my third discrimination complaint, BCHRT 51, 04, Feb 2009, where I challenged the theft, where it was withdrawn. All the civil servants involved in that lie, theft, and presentation should have been fired and charged with Copyright theft, Intellectual Property theft, and Intent of Use infractions, Perjury and other criminal offences. By the way these Protection instruments are all defense instruments listed on Government web pages to protect government from harm and misuse. The Superintendent, Martin, Howie, Dobbs, and the Supervising lawyer for the Attorney General's Office, Hunt, should be charged with Perjury and more. Why do Martin, Howie, and Dobbs still have jobs? Why aren't they in jail just for the theft and abuse of Affidavit? They also need to charged with Treason, Hate, and Prohibited Acts.
You are now involved in this lie, theft, murder, Treason, breach of settlement agreement, fraud concerning your budget done in order to pay for the illegal policy and phoney DME, etc, etc.

Also, Howie mentions in the same letter of February 27, 2004 that other countries in North America, Europe, and Asia also require medical assessments.
Hold it. In Ballem's letter a week before the Doctor stated that in “Canada, the US or Britain” there was no science to legally justify the need for a policy, little lone the consequences. As for the other countries in North America, Europe, and Asia how many are Socialist, Communist, Theocratic, Authoritarian, Fascist, Nazi, or Phoney Democracies? Just what we want to do, base social policy after these monster states.
Just what we want to do, follow the demands of corrupt gov't workers and not fulfill the demands of the Charter, the HR Code, the MVA, and Oaths of Office, and make us like those non - Democratic states? Ya, just what we want to do.
Is this why Martin, Howie, Dobbs, Hunt, and others care nothing for our Charter, the HR Code, the MVA or their Oath of Office, as long as they have power and get to kill and are not held responsible for their actions?

Lastly, in neither letters or any other correspondence during those years or within the HRT Discrimination Complaints did the OSMV, Howie, Martin, Hunt, or Dobbs ever acknowledge the medical intervention can do what it is alleged to be able to do and do any Good. (Ballem disappeared soon after this informative letter, actually she wrote to me a couple of times concerning the policy and how it is based upon their “view” of life and the discrimination is reasonable. Did she leave because she told the truth about the policy? Forced to leave? She worked for the Mayor of Vancouver, a senior administrator, during the Olympics. Why did she leave? Did she understand the corruption, the killing, etc, and as a Doctor realize she could not work within the system to make Good, to help make the world a better place?)
Nor, did they disclose the true consequences of the policy upon the Health Services, doctors, and the public.
Nor, how they somehow balance that Harm of the policy off with the believed harm of diabetic driving mishaps.
And once again, they base the policy upon their “view” that it is ok to do but really they do not have a “view” which allows them to make demands upon the public. They need to fulfill their Oath of Office, the demands of the Charter, the HR Code and the MVA, which they conveniently forget to do and never mention they are bound by. Not bound by what a Phoney Democracy or Communist or Fascist, or Nazi state they like to refer to, as why they do things.

Solicitor General, at that time I don't believe you were informed as to what the letters were really about and the illegality of the policy, just that you needed to prove the letter was a co - authored letter between your office and the Min of Health Services into an inquiry or complaint about policy, so someone contrived a letter for you to sign.
My letter to S G, Kash Heed, two S Gs before you, saw him write that his staff informed him that my complaint had been resolved. It hasn't, as the settlement agreement was never amended and the policy has not been legally justified, as the HRT buried it for the OSMV. His staff lied to him and I wrote and told him this. He resigned the second time before responding.
I wrote his replacement, another new S G, de Jong, but he moved offices before responding. He is now the Attorney General. He wanted to be the Liberal leader, therefore run to be Premier. So, he shuffled this off to you. He takes no responsibility for fulfilling the demands of the Charter, the HR Code, or the Motor Vehicle Act. Nor does he take responsibility for managing civil servants, which is easy as for the most part they, like most people, comply with the Law and those that do not fulfill their Oath of Office and Law can be dismissed. So, why didn't he do this? Why has he left this illegal policy with you? The theft, lies, killing, maiming, endangerment to life, hate, perjury, treason, prohibited acts, and more? He didn't stand up to this and now he's the Attorney General. He cares nothing for Canada or its citizens. Isn't that great, he's now joined with Hunt, who also cares nothing for Law, the Charter, the HR Code, the MVA, or her Oath of Office.

Why don't you phone up the Commissioner of the RCMP before he retires and tell him to begin the investigation into all this, make this public. Call Superintendent Burnside and tell him to make a public investigation into this as you, from default in 2004, are involved and cannot have the slightest glimmer of your involvement as it may seem prejudicial. These corrupt civil servants and cowardly politicians have no Right to jeopardize your political career or life.
Wouldn't if be great to rid ourselves of a few politicians that have been hiding this corruption. You may have a few new colleagues as Ministers, men and women that may take their Oath of Office seriously. Take the demands of the Charter, the HR Code, and the MVA seriously.

Solicitor General, you are the Minister of the Ministry of Public Safety and Solicitor General, why don't you cancel the policy just for “Public Safety”? Fire the Superintendent and Deputy, as you cannot trust them and they run an illegal policy and have endangered your life as you are now involved in their criminal activities, Treason, Hate, and Prohibited Acts. Fire Dobbs also as she stole science and used it for things it was not intended for, little lone breaching Copyright, Intellectual Property Rights, Intent of Use protections and the breach of Affidavit. Fire her as she stole science and broke the Oath of Affidavit to supposedly justify an illegal diabetic policy, so we must ask, “What has she done to falsify the need for the other 100 medical conditions she was hired to research and write policy for.” Charge her with every thing you can and more.

This theft and absolute disregard for Law is what Nazis do to justify their Hate against people they do not consider people.

Again, the Reviews I sent to the former S Gs exemplify the corruption of these people and government since you were S G. They get away with a little and nothing happens and now look where we are; the killing and maiming continues, the policy is illegal, they broke a Crown Settlement Agreement and didn't amend it or renew it, which means they are running their own project, their own Laws, in opposition to the demands of the Crown, (they pretend they are the Crown and mislead all as to what they are really doing), and those colleagues of yours, past Ministers of A G Office, S G Office, and the Min of Health Services are now running to be the leader to the Liberal Party and then for the Premier of BC. It's great they didn't win, as they are care nothing for the work of Democracy, Charter Rights, Human Rights, but you are stuck with them unless you make phone calls out side of BC as do you really think de Yong will investigate his own Office, his colleague, the lawyer Hunt?

MACLEANS, not a new contact but the author of their January 31, 2011article is; Ken MacQueen, “Our health care delusion”. He has no email so this letter, the Updated Consequences and the May 2010 Review must be sent to Toronto and they will forward it. Again, he only acknowledges the Public's demands not the Governments, always that greedy Public. We'll see what he does with this awakening to what is really happening with our UHCS and who is making the demands.
*

By email
Email to lawyers and Assembly of First Nations who are involved in the Investigation of the unexplained deaths of Sinclair and others and others maimed in the Overcrowded Emerge in Winnipeg,
CTV Winnipeg online news, winnipegnews@ctv.ca, covering story

Martin Pollock, counsel for Gerald Briggs, suffered brain damage and Olive Kirkness and survivors, mjp@pollockandcompany.com or mail@pollockandcompany.com

Clayton Ruby and Vilko Zbogar, counsel for Brian Sinclair and survivors, vilko.zbogar@orkinlaw.ca

Tapper Cuddy, LLP, tc@tappercuddy.com, represents Dylan Campbell, 12 yrs old, ctv Winnipeg, Nov 12 update of Nov 10 online article.

Shawn Atleo, National Chief of the Assembly of First Nations, info@shawnatleo.com
*

Organizations Previously contacted to inform them about the Corruption and Hate concerning Diabetes and the Disabled


Canadian Mental Health Association, ceo@cmha.ca

Behavioral Diabetes Institute, info@behavioraldiabetes.org

Disabled World, admin@disabled-world.com

Medical Reform Group, medicalreform@sympatico.ca

National Eating Disorder Information Centre, nedic@uhn.on.ca

West Coast Womens Clinic, info@westcoastwomensclinic.com
*

Press contacted by email about their recent articles on Health Care where they only acknowledge the demands of the Public but not the demands of the Government. Why do they never acknowledge gov't demands and their consequences.


Christie Blatchford, Globe and Mail, cblatchford@globeandmail.com

Scott Stinson, National Post, sstinson@nationalpost.com

Lorraine Mallinder, freelance journalist based in Montreal, lorrainemallinder@gmail.com