50 pp, April 29, 2011, Gov't attack, assault, and rape, Canada's Genocide

Canada's Democide
large numbers of the public killed by government policy, and an illegal one at that







The Assault and Rape of Dave Jenkins
by
Steve Martin, B Cs Superintendent of Motor Vehicles

and now
I fear for my life.

Contents


p 2 Contents
p 3 Opening
p 5 Solicitor General and RCMP
p 5 Mental Health
p 7 The Social Psychological Experiments; Milgram Experiment, Jane Elliott's diversity training, and the Stanford Prison Experiment.
p 8 ICBC, the third party as witness and naïve bystander
p 9 Language of the Day; Power by Sexual Dominance; the Big Dog

p 11 PART 1
p 11 What I have discovered and what has happened to me since canceling my license
p 11 Keith McCaskill, Chief of Police Winnipeg, Manitoba
p 12 Insurance Corporation of British Columbia and your illegal Form
p 14 Lets see how many other documents are lies, therefore Treasonable Acts concerning this policy.
p 15 Another lie and Treasonable Act
p 16 Another lie and Treasonable Act
p 17 Another lie and Treasonable Act
p 18 Speaking of BC HRT Discrimination Complaint #1954 (above paragraph) Pettiness and Vindictiveness
p 19 Temporary License Discrimination
p 22  RCMP
p 24 Why I have complied with the DME
p 25 Something else that is really sick here

p 25 PART 2
p 25 A second discovery concerning my Refusal to be Superintendent Martin's “Nigger on a Stick and Chain” and complete a Driver's Medical Examination when not needed.
p 25 Applying for the Renewal of my Driver's License; More HATE, HARASSMENT, and CORRUPTION
p 26 Solicitor General and RCMP
p 31 Who is to Review My “Type” of Diabetes?
p 32 Who is to Review this “NOTICE OF PROHIBITION”?
p 33 What I Want Now as Martin has Assaulted and Raped Me
p 35 I Accuse and Want Charges Laid, it's your job RCMP
p 35 I Accuse
p 40 What I Want
p 42 Damages
p 44 Benefits of Firing, Fines, and the Cancellation of the Illegal Policy
p 45 A living obituary living testament of impending death
p 46 I need to say this also, before Martin kills me
p 49 Previous Contacts by letter who will get a copy of this.
p 49 New Contacts by letter
p 49 Previous contacts by email who will again be contacted
p 50 Organizations Previously contacted to inform them about the Corruption and Hate concerning Diabetes and the Disabled
p 50 Press contacted by email about their recent articles on Health Care where they only acknowledge the demands of the Public but not the demands of the Government. Why do they never acknowledge gov't demands and their consequences.
p 50 New Contacts by email


Dave Jenkins
3107 Tanglewood Way
Nanaimo, BC, V9T 5A5
2diabetes.blogspot.com

April 20, 2011

Ministry of Public Safety and Solicitor General
Honourable Shirley Bond, Solicitor General.
PO Box 9053 Stn Prov Govt
Victoria, BC, V8W 9J7

Keith McCaskill
Chief of Police
C/O Winnipeg Police Service
PO Box 1680
Winnipeg, MB, R3C 2Z7

RCMP Commissioner William Elliot and
Superintendent G. Burnside
1200 Vanier Parkway
Ottawa, ON, K1A 0R2

and hello to all others contacted

 The Opening
Dear Solicitor General and others contacted;

This letter is sent as Witness to all involved just in case Steve Martin, Superintendent of Motor Vehicles, kills me. What he has just done to me needs to be documented, so you'll know why I died. I fear for my life due to what just happened to me.
As with my other letters concerning the illegal diabetic driver's policy this letter is long and complicated, as it takes time and paper to expose corruption, hate, bullying, harassment, falsified documents, malice, vindictiveness, retribution, assault, and rape and now justified fear for my life.

Solicitor General, all the other S Gs have buried this, de Jong and Coleman, have left this to you. This policy is illegal, they know what Martin is doing, and if he kills me you will be held responsible. Martin needs immediate Help. He and others need Firing and the policy Needs to be Stopped.
This policy is Democide: large numbers of the public killed by government policy, and an illegal one at that.

Secondly, I want my license back immediately, as there was no bona fide reason to cancel it with a Notice of Prohibition from Martin, as ICBC had already cancelled my license due to non - Compliance, not anything illegal.

If you wonder why I have not contacted the RCMP earlier, I contacted the RCMP two years ago about Martin and this policy and they have tried to bury this. They would not step up for me then, as they are afraid, which taught Martin he could do what he wants to do. However, Martin has also used falsified documents to manipulate the RCMP, and now they may become involved, as they have also been assaulted by Martin. Burying Democide is tragic to say the least, there is something desperately wrong with the management of the RCMP to not have intervened two years ago.
*

Firstly, I now fear for my life from your employee Steve Martin, Superintendent of Motor Vehicles, from what he has just done to me. He has escalated his deviant behaviour to the personal level, with an assault and rape of me, and falsely labeling me as a Criminal. He needs to be fired, receive mental health intervention, and controlled by the police and courts.

Second, I now fear for my life from his supporters of his illegal diabetic driver's policy.

Third, Martin, in Hate, Retribution, Vindictiveness, and Malice sent me a “NOTICE OF PROHIBITION”, which I discovered at an ICBC licensing office, classifies me as a Criminal. I have not broken the law, I have not driven under the “NOTICE OF CANCELLATION” I received from ICBC, I have not had a ticket for driving without a license, I have not had a ticket in years, I have not had an accident without a license, and Martin has not stated he has seen me driving. Only that his 'spies' have informed him I may have. I have not given Martin any reason to intrude into my life, except being alive and saying NO to him. Why am I designated a Criminal? I do not have any criminal charges against me for what ever reason, little lone driving. I have not been charged with anything, have not gone to court and been found guilty of anything. And yet, I'm now designated as a Criminal, to be Reviewed by unknowns if I ever want to drive again and clear this public humiliation from my Record of who I am. This driving record is accessible all over Canada, to numerous organizations, it is accessible to security organizations all over the world. He has consciously set about to Harm me. And he has.

Martin stated that, “I have information indicating that you may have driven during this cancellation.”. To know this he knew I willingly gave up my license and for some unknown reason has assaulted me and labeled me a Criminal, which has severe consequences upon me, socially, emotionally, financially, and physically. There is no reason for this escalation of his bullying, bias, prejudice, hate, ignorance, fear and loathing, disgust, contempt, and discrimination toward me, other than Hate, as all I had done was to decide not to complete the phoney illegal Drivers' Medical Examination and stopped driving by doing so.

Let me be very clear here. I said NO to the demand that I fulfill an arbitrary Drivers' Medical Examination; arbitrary being a change of my Classification from type 2 to type 1 diabetic. By doing so I knew I would have my license cancelled, which happened. That's it. I choose not to drive to see what would happen to me if I challenged this arbitrary demand of the already illegal diabetes driver's policy. My license was cancelled by ICBC. In response I wrote the letter of March 4, 2011 to ICBC, the S Gs office, and others exposing the illegal policy, its horrific consequences, and Martin's new attack upon me. I used ICBC as a third party, as witness, as they also have been abused, mislead, and misinformed by Martin's illegal diabetic driver's policy. Writing the OSMV is futile, as this had happened before, and the OSMV knows the policy is illegal and Harms, kills, it has not fulfilled their promises of change to the diabetes policy or cancel it as it should be. So, a third party is needed to expose their corruption. There is no Legal or Moral reason to keep this policy active, other than Hate.
Martin's response to me is based on Hate, Harassment, and Malice. I said NO to his discrimination, his bias, prejudice, hate, ignorance, fear and loathing, disgust, and contempt of the diabetic. I said NO to his construction of me as the Pariah, the Other, the Nigger on a Stick and Chain doing his dance in order to drive. (The dance is the fulfilling the driver's medical examination, DME, that cannot do what it is alleged to be able to do, for an illegal gov't policy.) I said NO to his RAPE of me, the Rape of my Charter Rights, my Human Rights, and my Rights under the Motor Vehicle Act. The Rape of my dignity, self respect, and position of law abiding citizen. NO to the construction of me as the Pariah, the Other, his Nigger. I just said NO and he couldn't stand that I have those Rights and the Right I have to say NO, which he has proved he is in denial of.
He responded with Corrupt Power, Hate, Harassment, Vindictiveness, Harm, and Malice to the uppity Nigger that would not do what he is supposed to do and that is, do the little dance for Martin and his corrupt supporters in order to drive. Do the dance to drive, as we all need to drive and I have been dancing since 1999, therefore I are not allowed to stop, not allowed to say NO; Martin will not accept this. He set his “Notice of Prohibition” into play, into action to teach the uppity Nigger that Martin has the power, power enough to keep the dance going, whether or not I want to play anymore, and he is going to Hurt me for challenging him and exposing him again. The “Notice of Prohibition” is proof that even if not driving he can hurt me, as this Prohibition is on my Record and out there for the public, the borders of other countries I want to travel to even though I do not have a license, it forces me to get other picture identification or carry my Passport with me at all times, and I need to pay a fine and will be Reviewed by unknowns.
Reader, you now see and understand me as a Criminal, an Outlaw, who has for no good reason, no bona fide reason had his license revoked by the Superintendent and will need to be reviewed by a Review Committee and this is after ICBC had legally canceled my license. This is a personal assault by Martin, using his position to mislead about what he is doing and misleading that he is at arms length.
He has Hurt me for actually standing up and saying NO to his perverted “View” of life. To his Criminality and Hate.
*

I want to know why Martin changed my Classification, as a type 2 diabetic with a five year Driver's Medical Examination cycle to a type 1 diabetic with a one year DME cycle. As with the attack upon me, there is no reason for this change. Don't forget, I'm Labeled and Classified already for no Legal reason and now he changes that Classification on his whim. This is what Nazis do, Classify and re - Classify and assault and batter those that challenge and if need be kill them. Think of his twisted, sick, mental health issues that now have Martin assaulting, raping, bullying, and re - classifying me for saying NO.
*
Solicitor General and RCMP

Solicitor General, I want Martin fired for putting me in a position that I fear for my life. Personal Killing is the next step in his perverted deviant behaviour, as no one has taken him to task for the illegal policy and its killing on a Public scale, done at arms length for protection and anonymity. Now he's Personalizing it under the guise of arms length.
I want Martin fired immediately for making me a criminal, when I have not been charged with anything or gone to court and been found guilty of anything.
I want Martin fired for Malice. For consciously acting is such a way to deliberately harm me.
I want Martin fired immediately for Hate, Threatening me and Implementing that threat, (the change to type 1 for no bona fide reason, which is a threat to me, as if I don't comply with this phoney new classification and the 1 year DME cycle I will loose my license, which happened for challenging him ), Harassment, Falsifying legal documents, (changing me to a type 1 and other documents listed below), (by classifying me with a Notice of Prohibition, which is on my driving record with the results I am realized as a criminal and need management and reviews, as if I have done something wrong.)
I'm sixty one years old and this is senior abuse. Whether I like it or not I am seen as a senior just like I am now seen as a criminal. A liability that needs management and control over, but the public doesn't know this is not justified.
I want him charged with falsify legal documents, as he has listed me as a criminal without due process. I have not been charged with anything, or been to court and trial and yet I am now in the public space a criminal, as that is what people are whom break the law and drive without a license, they are found guilty of something and given the Notice of Prohibition and need to dance hoops before they are allowed to drive again. I have done nothing except to challenge Martin and his illegal policy and stopped driving. To stop driving warrants a Notice of Prohibition? No it doesn't.
I want Martin charged with all those accusations listed in my March 4, 2011 letter to ICBC, the RCMP, and others used as witness, and to your office new Solicitor General. You have inherited this illegal policy and its killing and corrupt staff. Not all but many.
I want the RCMP lawyers to charge Martin with every charge they can think of concerning what has happening to me; it's your job RCMP, to defend the Crown and the Public. We cannot use the BC Attorney General's office lawyers as Hunt, Supervising Lawyer for the A G office, is intimately involved in this illegal policy therefore contaminating any involvement. Don't forget, she knows the policy is illegal. Played a charade to cover up the breached settlement agreement, managed the BC HRT Discrimination Complaint where stolen research was placed under the Oath of Affidavit and offered as bona fide legal documents for use, which of course they were not, etc.
I want my designation of type 2 back because that is what I am.
I want the “Notice of Prohibition” classification that is on my record deleted, as it is an illegal act against me, denigrates my character, harms my dignity, humiliates me, and abuses my self - respect as I am not a criminal or needs to be Reviewed by someone like Martin and his Nazis supporters. Martin and his supporters need mental health Reviewing.
As I have completed the DME I want my license back, as I have fulfilled the demands of ICBC.
I want the diabetic drivers policy cancelled, as it is not a legal policy, it has never been proven to be needed, little lone offer any Good. I want it cancelled, as those running it are corrupt and use all the above and more to keep it running just for Power, Greed, and Hate. And now Martin is assaulting diabetics that challenge him.
*

Mental Health

For Martin to do what he is doing is problematic to say the least, knowing the policy is illegal and that it harms society, his Office has admitted that it knows this, and knowing it does no Good, and yet he continues on with his policy making one wonder about his mental health.
Insanity is defined as when we keep doing the same thing expecting different results. He's running this policy not knowing what the results could be, as he has no idea of what needs to be changed, to realize any Good. This defines insanity.
He is doing the same illegal thing with no results of change. No results because he has no beginning for comparison. Another example of this madness is the Draft of the diabetic policy I was given to Review. It was given with the misleading belief that I or the public had something to compare to, to show change. When in fact there was no previous policy for comparison, so I Deconstructed the Draft for what it is; Lies and Hate. It would have been insane to look for something to compare to and yet that is how it was presented to me and any other reader. He is running his illegal policy with nothing available for comparison to, to prove change, therefore Good. How insane is that?
This is not War where one needs to adjust to the killing, maiming, and endangerment to life to save one's sanity and that is what we do. This is Canada, there is no War. There is no need for gov't to run illegal policy that kills its own people. This is what Libya is doing. It's called a Crime Against Humanity, Genocide, Democide. This is what Martin is running and managing in a time of Peace; the killing of Canadians for his own perverted “view” of life, and you don't believe he and his supporters don't have mental health problems; that this doesn't impact them.
Martin and his supporters need to be asked how many naïve bystanders in Emerge have died due to the consequences of his illegal policy. Emerge doctors will tell us. Coroner reports will inform us. Death reports will inform us. A public announcement for the survivors of deaths for contact, since 1999, in Overcrowded Emerge facilities will inform us. The fact that he runs an illegal policy, funded by my taxes, which takes taxes away from bona fide medical needs, with Good, meant I needed to buy my own spinal operation? He knows this. How many are maimed because they cannot afford what I was able to do? How many die? Is this acknowledgment of deaths, maiming, and endangerment to life straining his sanity? It should. If it doesn't why doesn't it? What kind of person is he? What kind of people are his supporters knowing all this?

Martin Rapes me of my Charter Rights, Human Rights, Motor Vehicle Act Rights, and now I won't conform to his new level of discrimination, his hate and harassment, so he intervenes and keeps playing without me and invents criminal activity but not to accuse me of anything for investigation, not to charge me with anything, but skip all that and designate me as a Criminal, deserving a Notice of Prohibition, which means if I want to delete this criminal designation from my public record, if I can, I need to come back to his game of Discrimination and Hate, to remain his Nigger on a Stick and Chain and be investigated by unknowns, not knowing what charges I am guilty of, subservient to whomever they are and him, as if in Nazi Germany, or a Democrat in China, or Human Rights advocate in Myanmar. How do I explain myself if there is no activity for comparison to, to prove I'm a good boy and made changes? This is part of his insanity that he contrived to harm me. He invents things that no one else can see and reacts or responds to them.
He has escalated his deviant behaviour by attacking me personally for saying NO. NO to his demands that I be his Nigger and dance to his tune, that I have NO Right to stop, to say NO. So, he deliberately Harms me? It's called Malice and much more. Don't forget, I had already had my license cancelled when he attacked me; he attacked me because he thought he has lost Control over me. The Notice of Prohibition is no small matter, according to ICBC staff, as it is beyond their job description, their ability to intervene. Martin knows this.
Martin deliberately reached out and touched me, he deliberately Harmed me, for No reason at all, in a sane world. He is again making things up. He did not need to contact me. He made something up for an excuse. If I want to drive I need to go back and interact with him. This is perverted control, abusive, sick, twisted, fictitious power. This is what abusers, rapists, and murders do, they force their victims back to interact with them; its about control and submission, isn't it. They use Shame to control the victim to not expose the criminal act. This letter in itself is interacting with him. Court cases will be interaction. This is perverted, sick, twisted, false use of power. Martin needs to be exposed. This is exposure to tell the world I said NO, as he hasn't accepted NO.
Reader, I really have been assaulted and raped and its terrible. His next step really is to kill me. He's adjusted to the killing; he's normalized it, it's acceptable.

The next step of Harm is what? He has assaulted and raped me. Where does his “view” take him now?
I'm not playing his game now, or am I? By writing this letter I am making his game public, interacting with him, but it is done to confront him again, not to play his game, as now you are witness. Just as in Rape and Abuse people need to make these events public, do this in order to stop the rape, abuse, hate, and discrimination. So, now his new set of problems, the harassment, assault, rape,and false documents exposed in the body of the letter below, are now in the open, what is he going to do with me now? What if I tell him I'm going to keep driving as his Notice of Prohibition is not legal tender, as it is not based upon anything real or tangible, its fiction.
Reader, this really is out of hand and people need to intervene with Martin and his supporters, as they are all acting together. What is the next physical harm?
He kills me. That's what he does. His deviant behaviour has moved for Public to Personal space and now from arms length harm to hands on harm, personal harm, and all the while using his position to deceive that he is at arms length.

Reader, no one has stopped him from running his illegal policy and the harm it does. You, all the people I have contacted have proved yourselves cowards and not stood up against him or for Canada. You have proved that you do not have the guts or nerve to step up, so he has learned, he knows he can do what he wants and you will not intervene. The RCMP have proved this; they have buried this, as has the BC HRT, as has the Attorney Generals Office, who has buried this. All whom I write have proved this and he knows you won't step up. What kind of twisted sick power does that give him?
So, if he kills me I will be dead and at least this will be a public record of events. This is also a public record of your cowardice. Any involvement after my killing will be too late for me won't it. You won't even stand up for all those killed in Emerge right now, so standing up for an old type 2 diabetic seems improbable. An old man standing up for Canada and a real Democracy, not the phoney democracy you want, Human Rights, and our medical system. You people don't deserve Canada; you have a phoney democracy and that is not what Canada is. All the laws that make Canada have been broken by Martin and his supporters, and you wonder why he has run amuck. Turning Canada into a phoney democracy is also a mental health issue.

Do you think he will shoot me? Or run me over with a car, no witness'? Or as I'm a criminal now, by his illegal contrivance, just add more phoney charges and have me in jail, where one of his other victims or maybe Hunt, the Supervising lawyer for the Attorney General's office, as she is intimately involved in this illegal policy, will have a killer jailed by her, kill me for favours? How do you kill someone like me when you've started to personally and deliberately harm them, not from arms length, as the illegal policy does, but from his personal touch now? What will push him to kill me after raping me of my Rights, Dignity, Self Respect, and Humanity? After Assaulting me and Classifying me as a Criminal? Do I deserve to die in his twisted mind? Will this review and exposure do this? I think it will. This is a terrible feeling especially knowing that I have not done anything to warrant it, except confront absolute corruption. That's something in itself isn't it. That's worth killing over isn't it. If assault, rape, and humiliation does constrain the diabetic.
*

The Social Psychological Experiments; Milgram Experiment, Jane Elliott's diversity training, and the Stanford Prison Experiment.

Milgram, 1961, on obedience to authority figures, “measured the willingness of study participants to obey an authority figure who instructed them to perform acts that conflicted with their personal conscience.” (wikipedia, milgram experiment)

Elliott, 1968, Blue eye/Brown eye Exercise, Elliott “exposes prejudice and bigotry for what it is, an irrational class system based upon arbitrary factors. Her teaching “exercise labels participants as inferior or superior based solely upon the color of their eyes and exposes them to the experience of being a minority.” (www.janeelliott.com)

Zimbardo, 1971, Stanford Prison experiment, volunteer students role playing as prison guards and prisoners, “...the participants adapted to their roles well beyond what even Zimbardo himself expected, leading the “Officers” to display authoritarian measures and ultimately to subject some of the prisoners to torture. In turn, many of the prisoners developed passive attitudes and accepted physical abuse, and, at the request of the guards, readily inflicted punishment on other prisoners who attempted to stop it. The experiment even affected Zimbardo himself, who in his capacity as “Prison Superintendent,” lost sight of his role as psychologist and permitted the abuse to continue as though it were a real prison. Five of the prisoners were upset enough by the process to quit the experiment early, and the entire experiment was abruptly stopped after only six days”. (Wikipedia)

Lastly, what were the American troops caught doing with Iraq prisoners of war? Some say Canadians in Afghanistan and Canadian troops in Somalia did the same thing? Same kind of stuff but real, not an experiment. What I have come to understand is I'm involved in the same corruption of our society except it is real; and reader you're involved to. This is what happened to Sinclair, in Manitoba, what Chief McCaskill is Investigating, a very real working example of the above, where people are killed, maimed, have their lives endangered, and experience the prejudice brought forward by the blue eyed/ brown eyed exercise, by those in power.
Martin is doing the harming, he is inflicting the pain and suffering. He is the stripping me, raping me, and he knows this. Martin knows he is wrong and yet he hasn't changed and if he doesn't know this is wrong then why doesn't he?
This brings psychopath and sociopath into this game of his.

Chief McCaskill, you and I are in a working example of the above. This is a Grand or Huge working example of the above studies of our behaviour, human behaviour. Your colleague that made contact with me is really shaken and is having a difficult time accepting what you and I have found ourselves within. They should be. I accepted their anonymity, as this is nasty, it is not a nightmare, something fiction, this is real and absolutely corrupt; they were asking for protection and I accepted their request. He or she is a good example of those that walk out of these kinds of experiments, if they are allowed to. I walked and was attacked and raped by Martin and turned into a Criminal. The town where Elliott did her blue eye/brown eye exercise on prejudice, bigotry, and racism hates her. Elliott is not welcome back. Chief, what's going to happen to you and your colleague? Look what just happened to me.
Chief McCaskill, you have access to psychologists and psychiatrists due to your position as Chief of Police, Winnipeg. They need to read and understand what is really happening with the diabetes policy and its consequences and its influence upon your Investigation. They need to expose how corrupt this is to you and your Investigation. The broken laws of our country; the Charter, the HR Code, the MVA in order to play this game of Control and Hate by the anti - diabetic lobby and anti - disabled lobby is astounding to say the least. The lies about the Policy being legal, the false documents, the lack of accountability and responsibility, stolen scientific research, the denial of doing so, the phoney Drafts, the breach of Trust, and the acts of Treason. And now, the new attack and rape upon me by Martin, all because I said NO. The absolute denial of what is happening by the Press, politicians, and the public figures I have contacted. They know there is something wrong and they are afraid. This also confronts their sensibilities about Canada, as it has your colleague.

Again, Martin knows he is wrong and yet he hasn't changed and if he doesn't know this is wrong then why doesn't he?

Martin's increased aggressiveness is part of the problem, his problem. He has escalated his deviant behaviour in order to harm, to keep me in my place even though I left the experiment, he wouldn't let me walk out. He's Harming me, no different than electrically shocking me, in Milgram, knowing he is harming me, as a “student” guard knowing his is beating and torturing me, Stanford Prison Experiment, and as a blue eyed/brown eyed person of difference, as the minority, all of whom are put into their place with learned deviant behaviour, which increases 'to what', if not confronted and exposed?
To death if allowed to continue. Martin has moved to a new phase, the attack upon the individual, personal harm, by assault and rape. What's next, Chief? What's next RCMP? What's next for your employee Solicitor General?
*

ICBC, the third party as witness and naïve bystander

Reader, it was interesting to watch the ICBC employee's face, body language, and denial of what had happened to me. When she looked me up on the computer there was the “Notice of Prohibition”, which stopped her from giving me my license even though I had now conformed and completed the DME as requested by ICBC. She could not believe there was nothing on the computer that justified the Notice of Prohibition, as it is a very nasty declaration of driving deviation or deviate behaviour. I informed her that I did not have tickets, accidents, alcohol infractions, drug infractions, etc, etc, which of course she knew as there was nothing on the computer, only that I had decided not to comply with that DME, had changed my mind, and had completed it, as requested by ICBC's “Notice of Cancellation”. She was in total disbelief about what she was now facing, involved in; this did not make sense to her. I reminded her she was the Third Party and not responsible, as she was doing her job and had been told this was a bona fide legal Notice of Prohibition, by someone in authority, by the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles, Martin. But he never wrote 'the why of the Notice of Prohibition' did he, and this was another flag that something was happening beyond her pay grade. When I left she thanked me for acknowledging that she is the Third Party and not responsible for what had been done to me. I imagine there are a lot of people that say nasty things to her due to fines and Notice of Prohibition. She's right, it isn't her fault and she knows something is really wrong to have this Notice of Prohibition, without any reason (s) for giving it, as there are severe consequences.
The ICBC staff member knew there was something wrong and faxed my completed DME to someone to make sure they had received the DME Form from the medical clinic, allowing me to get a new license, as there was nothing on the computer to warrant the Notice of Prohibition, to make sure the DME Form was not something counterfeit, like Martin's Forms. She was then transferred to someone else for a check on the Notice of Prohibition. This was also confirmed.
So, the staff investigate, as they know something is wrong, but Martin does no such thing, he punishes me for having secret “information” that I may be driving and once again challenging him. It is impossible for Martin to acknowledge these stages of investigation; this is proved, as Martin has not worked through the demands of the Charter, the HR Code, and the MVA in order to stick his face into my life, according to Martin I do not have Rights, Equality, and Inclusion in society, in Canadian life. At least the ICBC staff member was fulfilling her duty of investigation of process.
Chief McCaskill, I think this is what your colleague is aware of but cannot accept, because it is Canada wide not just an experiment or teaching exercise. Does she or he worry about whom is going to come after him or her? I wasn't told who it was with purpose in mind.
*

Solicitor General and the RCMP someone needs to look at Martin's mental health before he kills me. And at the same time, look into all the others involved in this illegal policy, as they know it's illegal and harms. How do they justify the killing? How do they justify just one kill from their illegal policy? How do they justify using my tax dollars for the DME knowing it's phoney and offers no Good and in doing so take tax dollars away from needed surgeries, such as my spinal surgery?
*

I have the Right as a Canadian to be able to walk down the street without the fear of Martin killing me. That has been taken away with his attack upon me.
*

Illegality begets illegality, therefore corruption
Corruption begets corruption, therefore threats
Threats beget perverted power, therefore Personal threats
Personal threats beget stalking the prey
Stalking begets Killing
*

Reader, who do these senior civil servants think they are to refuse to accept NO? They are Monsters.

Who are these senior civil servants to say Canada cannot say NO to an illegal diabetic policy based upon bias, prejudice, hate, ignorance, fear and loathing, disgust, contempt, discrimination, and the lack of fulfillment of the demands of our Charter of Rights and Freedoms, our Human Rights Code, and our Motor Vehicle Act statutes or Sections? Who are they to say NO to NO? Canada is allowed to be the first to delete an old social policy based upon fear and loathing of people of difference. Who says we're not allow to do this? Monsters?
What Good does this policy do? None. None and look at the Harm.

These people are criminals and monsters. They care nothing for Canada, or Democracy, or Human Rights, or Life.
These people are monsters, they are the monsters of the Human species. They are the monsters in every society or culture and do NOT need to be listened to.
*

Language of the Day; Power by Sexual Dominance; the Big Dog

Reader, let's use the language of the day just in case you are not understanding what Martin is really saying. Let's use the language that is used outside of the Public's ear, in the private places of Martin and his supporters.
What he said with the change of Classification, which changes the cycle of DME from a five year cycle to a one year cycle, is that I have power and if you want to drive, yes you Nigger, you need to kiss my ass and comply, you need to brown nose, and I may even bend you over my desk.
Reader, if you do not know what these three nasty power terms mean you have problems. Martin really has introduced sexual bullying, therefore a power play by Sexual Dominance. He's the Big Dog.
However, I refused to kiss Martin's ass or brown nose and stated so by not completing the changed Classification and the new DME cycle. A new Classification of the Nigger for no legal reason. So, he had my license cancelled because I would not get on my knees to him. I did the opposite didn't I. I exposed his bullshit, his threats, his sexual harassment, his perverted “view” of life with my letter to ICBC, and to his Temporary boss or manager, the S Gs office, the RCMP and others as witness. I didn't bend over for him did I.
So, what does he do? He escalates his sexual perverted “view” of life to assault and rape. This game of his is to fuck me now. He's really going to fuck the Nigger now for being uppity. There's no ass kissing now. He escalates it and turns his front to me, with his zipper facing me, which tells me I need suck his dick if I want to drive.
What do you think he's really doing? He's learned he can run this illegal policy and its killing, maiming and endangerment to life and you, the RCMP, politicians, the Press, and notable public have condoned his behaviour. So, the escalation to assault and rape and sexual harassment will also be condoned, you have reinforced his deviant behaviour.
He decided to really fuck me for what I have done, challenging him again and exposing him, and when I stood up and said NO, he went over the edge and declared me a Criminal with this Notice of Prohibition with a minimal of a month suspension and nothing there for me to confront to show I've made changes and been a good little Nigger for those unknowns Reviewing me. The blow job did not happen, so the shame, intimidation, and sexual humiliation that accompany such violence is still there for him to use as who is going to talk about this attack knowing the shame and humiliation of such things and in the Public space.
Reader, these negatives are now here for life, they do not go away and Martin knows this, he is not a naïve bystander here, not knowing he is telling me to kiss his ass, etc.
Reader, if you are in denial of this your naïvety is not acceptable. I'll live with these things all my life, as he really has assaulted and raped me and threatened me with his presentation of sexual dominance. So exposing this will not allow him to get away with his perversions; maybe they won't happen to someone else. And besides, I don't have long to live anyway, with how his aggressiveness and deviant behaviour has increased, so why not expose him, with his pants down for all to see.
What he's also saying is just be quiet and take the month suspension and label as Criminal or this Review will last for years. I'm the Boss and its time you really learned this. To accept the punishment because he's the boss, he's the Big Dog, and all the other dogs need to kiss his ass or lick his dick. I'm never going to kiss his ass or lick his dick. Would you? How many of you are already doing this, as you have NOT stood up to him yet, stood up for Canada, for Democracy, and Human Rights.
Reader, this is what really went on and you know it, but are just afraid to say it and make it public, he knows this. That is why he will escalate his deviant and perverted behaviour and kill me.
I get murdered because I won't give a corrupt senior civil servant a blow job or bend over his desk for him.
Ask Martin how many people he thinks his policy has killed. What's one more.

PART 1
What I have discovered and what has happened to me since canceling my license


Dear Solicitor General and readers; Just pretend that Martin has killed me and you are now reading my story.

This is in response to the cancellation of my drivers license. I want to know why Steve Martin, Superintendent of Motor Vehicles, attacked me for doing so.
Secondly, I want to know why Martin changed my Classification of a type 2 diabetic with a five year Driver's Medical Examination cycle to a type 1 diabetic with a one year DME cycle; I'm not his Nigger to be re - Classified at his whim.

This is the second time he has done this. The first time I wrote a complaint and it was resolved as it was a change in license class, but this time is harassment, especially so after the years I have been exposing his illegal diabetic driver's policy and its horrific consequences. He should have cancelled the illegal policy, not canceled my license and attacked me with a Notice of Prohibition.
This second time is harassment as Solicitor General, your office, and others know the diabetic driver's policy is illegal and I've been confronting your Office about this since 2002. A reminder of what is in your office, Martin and Howie, stole and presented the stolen research within an Affidavit in an effort to justify the policy. I challenged the presentation and the stolen research was withdrawn, so the policy is still illegal and the world should know this about your staff, your office, the others involved, such as the Supervising lawyer for the Attorney General's office, Hunt, the private lawyer she hired, Iyer, and your so called academic researcher Dobbs who stole the science and broke the Oath of Affidavit. Martin and Howie absolutely know the policy is illegal and yet Martin continues on with this illegal demand using the threat of loosing one's license for compliance. And what about the Harm of the policy to not only me, as a diabetic, but to society? Now he's personalized the harm.
Once again Solicitor General and RCMP, I'm not Martin's, Howie's, and the other corrupt civil servants Nigger on a Chain and Stick doing a little dance for them. Saying NO to them has exposed another corrupt dimension of these people, their illegal policy, and their killing. What has happened to me has been well worth the effort for the inconvenience of not driving and exposing them again for what they really are, what they have done, and are doing.
What I have discovered is absolutely astounding, as stated above in the Opening, and is fearful to say the least.
*

Keith McCaskill, Chief of Police Winnipeg, Manitoba

Dear Chief McCaskill, I enjoyed the visit from your representatives the other day concerning your Investigation into the Sinclair and other deaths and maiming happening in your Overcrowded hospital Emerge facilities. Concerning the material I sent to you to inform you about gov't demands upon the universal health care system that are not acknowledged, therefore not funded properly, therefore not managed, therefore an unknown deficit upon the UHCS, something you are investigating. To say the least I am pleased to learn someone, a colleague in your department, read what has/is happening to me and how it really will impact your investigation. He or she seems to be genuinely interested in understanding the depth of the problem and therefore maybe doing something.
Your colleague's sensibilities should be crying in dismay, should be outraged that this really is happening, really is happening in Canada and demanding the gov't explain what they are doing and why, as the diabetic driver policy is illegal and the DME not able to do anything, except set me up as a Pariah, the Other, the Nigger who needs constant medical care. Chief, what I have described above in the Opening should be a warning to you and the other investigators, (the lawyers involved, the First Nations people) of what may happen to you in your exposure of corruption in Manitoba, as you also have a non - private insurance program and diabetic and disabled driver's policies.
The following will also expose illegal gov't documents of the OSMV used to manipulate, mislead, and misinform about the OSMV legal power. Falsified legal documents used as legal tender is what you will also need to look for. Your colleague's dismay will only be heightened from what has just happened to me.
Chief, you are not naïve to the illegal gov't demands anymore and their horrific consequences and their scale and how they are trying to hide it. How they have tried, unsuccessfully, to justify the policy, through stolen documents, therefore to also justify the consequences somehow.
Unfortunately you are experiencing a working example of what I have been writing about for the past eight years concerning the OSMV, its senior civil servants, and their illegal driver policies and the horrific consequences that they refuse to acknowledge. They should have cancelled the policy when they knew it was harming the public ten years ago or more. They have continued on with their personal policy, personal as they have chosen to continue on knowing the policy is illegal, that they have not fulfilled the demands of the Charter, the HR Code, the MVA, and their Oath of Office. The killing and slaughter continues today, as they have not cancelled the policy. And now they have attacked me.
Secondly, Chief, your representatives did not offer the name of your colleague that asked for the interview and I didn't push for their name, as at least he or she had the guts to inquire. That's a big idea Chief, as they are thinking about this.
However, this is a very sad statement to acknowledge about this illegal policy and the consequences. That your colleague is afraid to say who they are. This is a very real problem isn't it. When confronting corruption, lies, deaths, murder, Genocide, corruption of those in high places, and more, people become afraid and refuse to be engaged and the corruption continues on and the naïve bystanders die, become maimed, or have their lives endangered, as happened to me. Little lone the stripping of my Rights. Sinclair, Olive Kirkness and the others you are investigating are at least now being acknowledged as Humans that lost their lives to corruption and corruption of society, as they were turned invisible.
Lastly, the following is another example for your colleague to jump up and down about and scream this is not happening, not happening in Canada. I needed to say NO to Martin and Howie and the other corrupt senior civil servants running this policy and see what would happen, as I have given them enough time to legalize the policy or cancel it. Your inquiring colleague is not going to like this, as it will impact you as it has impacted ICBC the insurance corporation that gives and cancels licenses. It has impacted the RCMP, which means this corruption is national in scope again, (the first being the theft of world research and using the mail to send falsified documents from province to province) and all local police agencies in BC, therefore probably impacting your local RCMP and your police agencies and your Office.
Chief, you made my day that someone in your office understands the horror of all this. It's wonderful they are asking questions. They need to ask more questions. This new level of corruption I'm now involved in will give them more ammunition.
*

Insurance Corporation of British Columbia and your illegal Form

Well done ICBC. Well done Kathy Thomson, Director, Provincial Licensing, for standing your ground and canceling my license, as you thought you had the Right to do. However, now you know the policy is illegal and now you know the forms are not legal tender, but false documents used to manipulate ICBC, the RCMP and other police forces. Yes, the form sent to me, from you, is illegal and contrived to manipulate you into doing things you shouldn't do. (MV2602, (032008))

Martin sent this demand of cancellation to ICBC in order to be at arms length from this new level of harassment and illegal demands of me. Standard practice I imagine for regular intervention on face value, but this isn't is it. This at arms length doesn't diminish his responsibility for doing what he is doing. It makes it worse, as he is using naïve bystanders to do his illegal activities; to try and hide his hate, retribution, vindictiveness, and malice by using ICBC for a supposed regular intervention. He is always trying to put himself at arms length from the illegal policy and its consequences, as he did with the broken Settlement Agreement that the Crown composed, on the behalf of the OSMV, to entice me to cancel the Discrimination complaint, #1954, for promises made. He should have fired Howie then, for breaking a Crown agreement, a Crown demand and promises, demanding civil servants obey the Crown promises that they contrived. He should have cancelled the policy then. Of course the policy is running against the demands of the Crown, so by breaking the Settlement Agreement meant nothing to them and they learned they could get away with that also. And when we look back at the promises offered to me to settle out of court, we come to know they had no intention of writing a Policy Paper legalizing the policy, as there is no science to justify the policy little lone the consequences.
Learning to be at arms length has allow Martin to escalate his perverted behaviour. So, without accountability being in place, his Deputy, Howie also learned she could do what she wanted and her corrupt behaviour continued on with the theft of science, etc as she learned nothing would happen to her, and Martin remained at arms length pretending nothing happened. He should have been fired for this. Why wasn't he? Probably because there was another new Solicitor General, as they were coming yearly and sometimes two a year. A corrupt ministry corrupting the politicians. Imagine that. I began this a few weeks ago with de Jong, then Coleman, and now Bond, imagine the corruption Bond has just found herself within. Surrounded by thieves, liars, and a policy that kills more than the Afghanistan war has. And now this assault and rape and maybe I'm dead.
ICBC, Martin has learned he can abuse you and he has done so.
Martin has tried to be at arms length from all of this by playing the naïve bystander at arms length and having you be the problem, to be the scapegoat. Martin choose to be the boss. To accept the status, trust, power, and prestige the public has freely given him with the Title of “Superintendent of Motor Vehicles”. He has consciously broken all the rules and laws concerning this. He has broken the Trust that was freely given to him. He is responsible for all of this, not ICBC. ICBC is used as a false leader for the public to see and abuse and hide his behaviour.
Martin wanted Thomson to enforce his demand, to be his Nazi Goon. She did her job but really was another abused naïve bystander. I therefore informed Thomson I was not Martin's Nigger, nor her Nigger, nor was she Martin's Nigger, there to do Martin's dirty work. I wrote her a letter concerning what has/is happening to me, acknowledged the players, their involvement, their connections, and their corruption in order to bring context to the charades they and Martin have constructed to hide what they are doing and the consequences. This is the March 4, 2011 letter that was mentioned above, which was also sent to the RCMP, Chief of Police of Winnipeg, the lawyers involved in the Winnipeg investigation a working example of the slaughter going on in BC Emerge facilities. Human Rights Watch was contacted, as our HRT has been compromised concerning this policy. The Press and other parties that should know what Martin is doing because they are impacted by his actions and are again witness, as ICBC is.
ICBC did what was demanded of them and no more. I don't know if they forwarded the letter to Martin but they didn't reply to me concerning this non recognition of the cancellation of my license or what they had just learned about the change of Classification, or with their own 'Notice of Prohibition' for some bona fide reason, as they now know Martin didn't have the Right to cancel my license, little lone through them for his perverted reasons. Martin did his own assault upon me.
It seems ICBC refused to be Martin's Nazi Goon, and refused further contact with me. Therefore, Martin sent me a Registered Letter, March 17, 2011 informing me that;
“Regrettably, I must prohibit you from driving under Section 92 of the Motor Vehicle Act. For your own safety and that of others, you must stop driving immediately.”.

So, ICBC would not do Martin's dirty work after I informed them of his corruption, lies, theft, more lies, the deaths in Emerge, which is Homicide, and on a grand scale, Democide. That he had not fulfilled the demands of Section 25 or 29, which he then lies and informs all that ICBC can use Section 92 to cancel my license.
Secondly, Martin is lying when he states “for your own safety and that of others, you must stop driving immediately”.
He has never proved I am a liability to myself or others; science does not support his lie. Nor has he science to legally justify his lie.
Third, I didn't take the DME, so there is no information that I am unsafe and unsafe to others. Martin also knows the DME cannot do what it is alleged to be able to do. It does not evaluate anyone whether they are safe or unsafe, it is a scare tactic used by the anti - diabetic lobby and people like Martin that use it to denigrate the diabetic.
Martin does not know if I am driving, but because of his Hate he leads readers to believe I am. Martin uses fearful language to scare people. To denigrate my character. So people see and hear his constructed Pariah, me, the illegal driver and not the fact that I am not driving. Martin has never proved that I continued driving and yet readers do not remember this, they remember the SMV said I was a liability and a criminal, as I was driving without a license. They don't know the policy is illegal and he is a liar about that also. (More of this corruption and falsifying of documents below.)
ICBC, this kind of lying and manipulative language needs to be struck from any documents Martin and other senior civil servants have presented or present to you in order for you to do their interventions.

Once again, well done ICBC. Make Martin do his dirty work and be held responsible for his illegal behaviour, his threat, his harassment, and attack upon me. Be held responsible for the threat to me, my challenge of NO, and his implementation of that threat, and all the while knowing his policy is illegal. NO means NO. And then he Raped me of my Rights, Humanity, Self respect, and Dignity and you are not part of this, as you are the naïve bystander. At least for now, as now you know the policy is illegal and the forms you use are contrived, counterfeit legal documents. This is a Treasonable Act, counterfeiting documents and using them as legal Crown tender. That is what your letter is, its false, a lie.
ICBC, you investigate Fraud and other believed criminal acts against the Insurance company, which means they need to investigate Martin's office for Fraud, for his impact upon automobile deaths, maiming, endangerment to life, insurance claims for disability, insurance claims for death, as maybe the accidents or driver mishaps did not kill, maime, or bring about the endangerment to life that ICBC has paid for. Just maybe these deaths, maiming, etc happened in an Overcrowded Emerge or an Ambulance that could not deliver to Emerge, as Emerge was Overcrowded caused by illegal gov't policies, such as Martin's. Overcrowded by the consequences of Martin and Howie's illegal policy and other's illegal gov't policies, illegal DMEs, and other illegal and phoney Forms, therefore taking G Ps out of circulation, which drives their clients to Emerge, as they are not willing to wait 5 - 7 days for G P care.
ICBC, the Overcrowding caused by illegal gov't policy is doing the killing, maiming, endangerment to life, etc, not the driver mishap, therefore the lies of gov't are responsible for insurance claims not those drivers involved. It's gov't fraud.
Go after them ICBC. Hunt these people down and expose them. Set your hounds upon them. Make these senior civil servants take responsibility for their illegal actions, as you do for suspected criminal behaviour concerning fraud, deaths, maiming, and insurance claims. They are not above the law, they just pretend they are.
Go after them for presenting contrived illegal documents to you, counterfeit documents, in order for you to do illegal acts for them.
Hunt these people down, as a death labeled as 'unknown cause for death' means the investigation of the death is never closed until a bona fide reason is listed. Overcrowding is not a bona fide reason for death, especially as the Overcrowding comes from illegal gov't policy. There is no timeline to prohibit you from investigating unknown deaths.
*

Lets see how many other documents are lies, therefore Treasonable Acts concerning this policy.

Martin, your letter of March 17, 2011, C - 419318, states;
“Regrettably, I must prohibit you from driving under Section 92 of the Motor Vehicle Act. For your own safety and that of others, you must stop driving immediately.”

This is a lie. You use this letter as a legal document with power and it is a lie and you know it. You present this letter and Section 92 as legal tender, or something legal giving you power to do as you please, misleading readers you have fulfilled Section 29. Where in reality Section 92 is dependent upon Section 29, which you have never fulfilled. These sections are an “if and then” statement, if Section 29 is fulfilled or validated, then you can use section 92. This means Section 92 is a not applicable or something irrelevant, and you are lying about Section 92, as you have not fulfilled Section 29.
Your office has stated you use Sections 25, 29, and 92 of the Motor Vehicle Act, as giving you legal Power or Right do things to drivers. You do not have Carte Blanch to do what you want, these sections demand you prove and explain the governments demands, wants, or needs. They cannot be Personal demands, wants, or needs. You have not done this. I came to understand you have never proved the demands of Section 25. Your stolen research did not even have the appropriate research to justify your lie about having fulfilled this section.
Section 29 also demands you prove a need before gov't sticks its ugly face into the public's life. You have not fulfilled this demand either. Again, your stolen research did not even justify your lie about having fulfilled this section.
Everyone should know that Section 92 is dependent upon Section 29. How conveniently of you not to inform readers of this. If you, the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles, do not prove a bona fide need for intervention, fulfill Section 29 you don't have the Right to demand anything of anyone or me. You really need to fulfill both sections, 25 and 29 before Section 92 is applicable, as this is what you have informed the public as giving you Power and Right. You are a liar, counterfeited this document to have you Personal way.

Those that crafted the statutes or Sections of the MVA did so in order to keep people like your staff, outside influences, and yourself from doing what you are doing. What and who do you think they were written for?
Stealing scientific documents and hiding this act in the legal instrument, the “Affidavit”, is not proving anything except corruption in your office, staff, and yourself, as you are responsible for the OSMV.
These sections are there to keep corrupt civil servants from running policy they think, in their “view” is ok to do. That is what your office wrote, as to why they do this. Not that they are following the law but in their “view”.
You do not have a “view”. You and your staff have the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, the Human Rights Code, the Motor Vehicle Act, and your Oath of Office as direction. You fulfill these demands in order for you to comply with the laws of Canada, so your office does not become corrupt.
These instruments of Democracy are also there to protect you from corrupt demands upon society; like the anti - diabetic lobby, like the anti - disabled lobby. You have failed in all of these. You have not fulfilled any of these demands. So, you use paper lies to manipulate and deceive the readers of your letters. You use ICBC, RCMP, and the Police, who are naïve bystanders, to do your goon work. And now you've been caught by ICBC, RCMP, and the Police.
It's Treason, as your letter is a contrived illegal document done to manipulate, to allow you to run illegal policy against the demands of the Crown. Your contrived claim to be able to do the above is a conscious lie to manipulate and mislead about what you are doing. It's breach of your Oath of Office. It's a breach of Trust. And more.
Secondly, as stated above, Martin has not proved I am a liability to myself or others. This is another lie. I did not complete his demand for a new DME, that does not make me a liability to myself or others. It's a liability to Martin as I did not conform to his demands. This lie sets me up as a Criminal, a deviant, someone who will harm and has harmed. Martin has attacked my Rights, Humanity, Dignity, and Self respect in order to divert one into believing I am the criminal, where in reality he is the criminal. This conscious act of his is done to Harm, he has, with purpose, denigrated who I am, this is Public Humiliation, done to justify his perverted “view” of life and actions.
Reader, I just said NO to Martin and didn't complete the DME, which caused ICBC to cancel my license. There was no evaluation and Martin knows this. The letter is a constructed lie to manipulate all who use it or are impacted by it.
 *
Another lie and Treasonable Act

I have mentioned the following in earlier letters but nothing has happened, so it must be mentioned again. The new Driver's Medical Examination Form, DME Form, MV2010D (06/08) is also a lie, as the demand is not legal in the first place, as mentioned above, the demands of Section 25 and 29 have not been fulfilled; Martin only presents it as legal through a formal gov't form. This form was re - written after the change in fee policy coming from my BC Human Rights Discrimination Complaint, #1954; this complaint is not online for review, as I withdrew the complaint to settle out of HR court, as the OSMV asked this of me with promises of changes to the diabetic policy, which have not come and that was during 2004 - 2006. (The settlement agreement has been scanned to my blog site; 2diabetes.blogspot.com.)
Martin knew the policy was illegal then and has not done anything to rectify the lie; Martin, you are allowed to cancel the policy if it is not legally justified, as the law demands this of you. Why haven't you? You have continued on without a Policy Paper legally justifying your policy, your actions, and the horrific consequences, if that can be justified. Then you stole research and were caught. So, how are you going to legally justify the policy now, as the owners of the research know your office stole their research previously and they also know of the horrific consequences of the policy? Has your academic researcher that stole the science discovered any research to justify the policy and its horrific consequences? Did you fire her for stealing research? For swearing an Oath, from the Affidavit, that she had legal use to use the research? The research concerning type 2 is sparse, as it has been proved there is no problem with a difference between non - diabetic and type 2 driver mishaps, so why keep doing irrelevant, redundant, and unnecessary research. Is she going to make up phoney research for you now? This must be asked of an academic researcher that did what she did.

The second lie concerning this Form is that it is not able to “determine your fitness to drive a motor vehicle ...”. (coming from the small print introduction at the top of the page.) This is lie. This form does not fulfill the “determine your fitness to drive a motor vehicle”, which is an unproven fear of hypoglycemia. This form or so called medical examination does not prevent, predict, or manage hypoglycemia in any way, shape, or form. Your office has never studied the DME for any Good, and that is because you have no documents saying there is any problem; in order to see a difference, for comparison to understand if there is any Good. It is lie that this form can determine one's fitness concerning hypoglycemia. And that is what this policy is about, nothing else. It's about hypoglycemia, low blood sugar. The form does not even mention hypoglycemia, it only mentions “Significant hypoglycemia” and “Hypoglycemia unawareness”, which are specific terms in themselves for a very insignificant consequence of low blood sugar. And I need to say again the hypoglycemia is NOT only experienced by diabetics.
Reader, what happens to you when you don't eat, don't eat enough, on some whacked out diet, eat some kind of speed pill to give you energy, and work out, or drink or drink to much, or get stoned on medical or street drugs, or get sick and don't eat, and put some stress on top? You become hypoglycemic, why do you think some of your friends experience Road Rage and you can't explain it, as it only happened once or twice and it is so out of character, that you have not been able to explain it. Low food intake in the AM, frustrated driving, stress of job, too much coffee and low blood sugar and they get snarly. This never happened to you or your friends? You just don't know it's hypoglycemia, as you have been lied to that it is a diabetic problem and not something you straights will experience. Do you think Martin and his supporters would ever inform you of this? You got to be kidding.

The third lie concerning this Form is on the back page, under “To the driver:”.
This time Martin uses Section 29 for absolute power to do things, to pretend that he has Carte Blanch in his demands. As stated above you do not have carte blanch to do what you want.
Let's see how big the lie is here. This is what you have “written” on the Form;
“Under section 29 of the Motor Vehicle Act the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles requires you to have this form completed because you have disclosed a driving - related medical condition; ...”. (my underlining)
 
This is a lie. You do not have the Right to “requires” anything of anyone. You have not proved a need. You are bound by proving a need. You do not have the Right to do what you want or base your demands upon your “view” of life making demands of anything of the public. You know this. And yet you keep the lie going. Using a contrived illegal document as an instrument to mislead, misinform, and misrepresent needs to be exposed, to demonstrate who and what you really are.

The Real Wording of the Section 29 is;
“The superintendent may require a person to whom a driver's license has been issued to attend at a time and place for one or both of the following purposes; ...”. (my underlining)

You left out the most important word from those that crafted the MVA. It was placed there to keep you honest and obeying the law, so you don't do what you are doing. Making false demands based upon your unknown “view” of life. Your “view” of life is not worth following, as you cannot even fulfill the demands of the Charter, the HR Code, your own MVA, and your Oath of Office. This means your “view” of life is counter to Canada's Democracy and Human Rights. Why should anyone need to live with your “view” of life? You consciously left out the word “may”, as in “the superintendent may require ...” in order to manipulate, deceive, mislead, misinform, and misrepresent in order for you to run your discriminatory hateful “view” of life.
Those that crafted the MVA sections did this for you to follow, for action as well as protection. This means you “may require” me to do something if and only if you can prove a need and the consequences of that intervention are acceptable and you never have done this.
This means the public needs to see the material you used to determine the “may require” demand. You have offered nothing and then stolen research, to prove the “may require”,which by the way did not prove a need, little lone justify the horrific consequences of the policy. You have changed the laws of Canada to do what you want to do. This is another example of Treason.
 
Something else concerning the DME Form. Under “Endocrine (section (9)” it states, “Diabetes, Insulin, yes, no”.
Where is type 1? Where is type 2? Where is gestational diabetes? If this medical condition is so important that you need to lie, steal, and falsify legal documents why isn't diabetes defined into its classifications?
Where is the line for medications other than insulin, as most diabetics do not use insulin? I've used both for years. I have type 2, use pill medications and supplement my insulin with a long lasting insulin supplement called Lantis, because it is less dangerous than some pills and is less harmful to my body. I have just started using another drug called Victoza, which has decreased use of pill medications and Lantis. I'm still a type 2, as nothing has changed to re - classify me to a type 1. I'm not insulin dependent, as Martin has falsely re - Classified me to be.
So, where does the doctor write all this on the Form? Or is the form computer read and the checked off boxes now define who I am? Re - classified even if there are no boxes for proper evaluation. Keeping you at arms length again from responsibility. I don't think so, you are going to use this as the scapegoat, that you did not know of my condition 'type' because a 'type' is not listed on the form. If it was a mistake you would have investigated this due to my letter to ICBC and the S G where I attend to this change. You chose not to not to investigate, as you didn't want to go there, as you contrived this change, as an instrument to challenge me at this time. You wanted to attack me further.
Martin, you keep all the DME Forms, so why isn't 'classification change' compared to older Forms if diabetes and diabetes designation is so important? Just another contrived window for lack of accountability and responsibility. Or are you going to blame this incomplete, incompetent form on those unknown Nazis that wrote the Draft, the Policy Paper, and second Draft that I reviewed? Those papers were beyond prejudicial. That these same idiots wrote the DME Form, so you take no responsibility for it? Just another phoney arms length protective act on your part but used to harm.
Your illegal policy turns the diabetic into the Pariah, the Other, a Nigger, who has no Rights and proper designation by you seems not to be needed, as long as those 'kind of people' are Labeled, Classified, forced to undergo a phoney medical examination and tracked for the rest of their lives; keeping you happy. And it's all illegal. This is what Nazis do.
Martin, you've kept the lie going with your lies. This form is corrupt and a lie. I shudder to think what lies have been presented concerning all the other medical conditions listed. And so should everyone else.
Reader, once again, don't forget, I visit the doctor 20 times for diabetic care before the one forced DME and Martin cannot admit this. Why? Because I'm a Nigger to him. Why doesn't he have a box for this fact on the form? Why, because if he did everyone would see diabetics do take care of themselves, that doctors do care for their clients, and this would break his construction of the diabetic as the Pariah, the Other, the Nigger that needs medical care; that doesn't do any Good.
*

Another lie and Treasonable Act.

When I received the DME Form to complete, only a year after completing a DME Form, meant someone had reclassified me as type 1, I saw this as Harassment, just more of the hate, lies, and corruption I have experienced from Martin's office, staff, and other gov't offices. I didn't write Martin this time, as his office and he have had years to comply to the law and have not, even knowing the killing, maiming, and endangerment to life they cause.
I decided to see what would happen with non - compliance; to see what kind of corruption would express itself this time. I was Right. All these Forms are illegal, consciously contrived and sanctioned by Martin to mislead and have others do his dirty work, such as cancelling licenses.
Kathy Thomson, from above, initially cancelled my license using MV2602 (032008) Form;
“The Superintendent of Motor Vehicles asked you to have an exam under Section 29 of the Motor Vehicle Act to verify you are fit to drive. You have not met this requirement. The Superintendent has directed me to cancel your driver's licence under section 92 of the Motor Vehicle Act.”

Again, Section 29 has not been fulfilled and the Form cannot verify that I am fit or unfit to drive and I did not have a DME in order for anyone to prove or disprove anything; it is Martin that has “not met this requirement” of the MVA, another example of Martin saying one thing with the right hand and the left doing something else. Just another mislead to manipulate. And again, without Section 29 being fulfilled Section 92 is irrelevant.

Thomson didn't know the policy is illegal did she? She didn't know the Form was a contrived illegal Form; a counterfeit document. Like everyone else and myself we just believe Martin has legally justified the policy due to the demands of the Charter, the HR Code, the MVA, and his Oath of Office. Now she knows Section 29 has not been fulfilled, therefore Section 92 does not come into play, as it is dependent upon Sections 29. Another naïve bystander experiencing his abuse and being woken up to his corruption. As stated above, she did not respond to my letter or my statement I will continue to drive, as the policy is illegal, etc. Why no response to my letter? Is ICBC afraid, like McCaskill's colleague, and so many others are?
This begs the questions; “How many illegal transactions has Thomson unknowingly done for Martin?”
How does Thomson feel now she knows the policy is illegal and harms? How does she feel now she knows she has been duped by Martin? How does she feel now that she knows she has been involved in criminal activity? What has Martin done to her character, dignity, and self respect?

This means Martin or his office duped, or under false pretenses, had ICBC sign legal documents that empowered it to cancel licenses for his office; to keep his office and himself, hands off, or at arms length from any responsibility or accountability. To make it seem as if ICBC was involved in the cancellation, therefore the demand must be bona fide, therefore legal. But in reality the demands were false and ICBC has been doing his dirty work of canceling licenses under false pretenses. How many crimes is that?

Lastly, this letter from ICBC is registered as; MV2602 (032008); this means it was re - written or contrived March 2008, with the MV meaning it comes from Martin's office. The policy was illegal at that time and Martin was stealing science in an effort to justify the policy and its consequences in my Human Rights Discrimination Complaint, which didn't happen because I stood up to him then also. It's still illegal and he knows this and yet this Form is still here.
I use 'contrived', as it is contrived, as the policy is illegal and it is a lie. It is contrived to hide, to mislead, to misinform, to misrepresent, as to what is really happening and what Martin and his supporters are doing. Contrived instead of 'composed' as the MVA sections are, as the Charter of Rights and Freedoms is, as the Human Rights Code is, and civil servants' Oath of Office is. Composed for openness, for evaluation, and debate. This is another example of Treason and another breach of their Oath of Office.
*

Another lie and Treasonable Act.

I had a conversation with a RCMP constable March 23, 2011. I needed to understand what what would happen to me if I drove to the RCMP office and informed them that I had driven to their office, knowing the cancellation of my license was illegal. The idea was to have a charge against me where I might be able to explain to a judge the “why of what I was doing”; to expose this corruption, murder, and treason. It was suggested that the traffic court would not entertain what I had found myself within; the lies, theft, murder, corruption, treason, etc. That I would be found guilty, fined, and have a record as I had driven there, counter to what I was saying about the supposedly illegal form. This was just to nasty. All this and then need to fight for my rights and try to cancel false forms. This never happens. But as I would not to have the opportunity to expose this corruption etc the idea was withdrawn, especially if I was to have a record. On the other hand this was a good idea, as I learned again about process, this is the legal process Martin skipped in labeling me a Criminal.
However, what was interesting was that the constable offered not only a summary of my idea but also gave me an Official Form concerning the cancellation of license; “NOTICE OF PROHIBITION FROM DRIVING A MOTOR VEHICLE” MV2636 (112005), which has on the back of it Sections 91, 92, and 93 of the MVA in detail. He suggested he give me this notice to inform me of the MVA sections; not given as a ticket. He gave it believing the document was/is a bona fide legal document. He gave it to me as an information instrument, as to what I was involved in. He gave me a document that has been constructed by Martin, to be used as legal tender, by the RCMP and other police forces, as an instrument of law, with power, and yet it's a lie.
Again, Section 92 is dependent upon 29 and 29 has never been fulfilled by Martin. He just lies that it has been, therefore making this Form another illegal document Martin uses to mislead, misinform, and misrepresent about what he is doing.
Another example of Treason, as he is using false legal documents, or counterfeit documents to run his policy in opposition to the demands of the Crown. How many of these documents have been used to cancel licenses and now we know the act of giving them out was illegal? Another example of breach of Oath of Office for lying and misleading, etc.

What we have here is the lie again. Another 'supposed' legal document based upon a lie. This “notice of prohibition from driving a motor vehicle” is listed or registered as (112005). It's a document that is supposed to be a legal document, which was re - written or written in (11) or November (2005) the year 2005. This is important, as my BC Human Rights Discrimination Complaint, #1954, concerning this phoney and illegal demand upon type 2 diabetics was in the process of winding down with the OSMV asking to settle out of court with promises made concerning diabetes policy and a change to Government Policy of who would pay for the DME. Don't forget, they broke the settlement agreement and it has not been re - written or amended; Martin is responsible for this, as he runs the OSMV. These civil servants broke a Crown legal agreement and did not rectify this breach but played a charade to hide their actions, so they could run their own policy against or in opposition to the demands of the Crown. This is Treason. Another breach of Oath of Office.
*

Speaking of BC HRT Discrimination Complaint #1954 (above paragraph)
Pettiness and Vindictiveness

Reader, just for your information, $75 is offered as a base payment for the DME. “Doctors may bill $75 for this examination.” (from the DME Form) This came from my Doctor who did not charge the full listed cost for the examination, as he did not believe in the diabetic policy or the DME; an example of good civil disobedience, as doctors are forced to comply as I am. In order for the OSMV to reimburse my DME fees, something the volunteered to do they need to know what I had paid, so they got receipts, where they saw this doctors only charged half the price. So, that is where the $75 comes from not from government evaluation, but from a doctor who was saying he didn't like the policy either.
Reader, do not think you need to be benevolent to gov't for this as it put up due to a Discrimination Complaint, as how was Martin going to explain why I should pay for an illegal policy. No, what you really need to see is how petty and vindictive these gov't people are. And understand that now your taxes are used for an illegal policy that offers no Good.
Again, 10% of society is diabetic, 430 000 diabetics, most are drivers, so lets round off to 400 000 x $75 = $6 000 000 or for a 5 year cycle $1 200 000 a year just to pay for type 2s. For what? This shuffle of taxes for an illegal policy and its phoney DME would pay for all those waiting for surgery and have taxes left for other bona fide medical needs offering Good. These would be Legal demands upon the health care system. Now add the other 100 medical conditions the OSMV states it manages at only a $1 000 000 a condition or 13 333 people with that condition and we are looking a $100 000 000 for the policy. And this money needs to be paid by the OSMV, as it will not be paid by the Universal Health Care System, as the DME is not a “medical necessity”. So money is shuffled, which is Fraud, as the policy is illegal. And the RCMP and other police forces are used as tools to implement the lies of the policy.
Do you believe the people doing this shuffle of taxes to pay for an illegal policy don't know what they are doing concerning this illegal policy, as my complaint is driving the change to this gov't policy? Do you believe they do not know the Superintendent has not fulfilled the demands of the MVA, Sections 25, 29, therefore not allowed to engage Section 92? This is the same kind of thinking of those that wrote the Forms, they know the policy is illegal.

Of course they know it's illegal, as that is what they are doing, trying to cover up my Discrimination Complaint, so it will not be in the Public space of a BC Human Rights Discrimination Complaint and be written up and published online for the world to see that the policy is illegal and harms thousands if not killing thousands of people going to Emerge for help. I have continued on fighting for my Rights and now the HRT has written it up online for all to see it is still illegal. That third HRT Discrimination Complaint was also worth the work even if the HRT buried my complaint. It was one of those serendipitous events that happen, the HRT in their effort to bury my compliant declared the policy illegal, the very thing I have been saying since 2002. They did what they were trying to bury. Why hasn't it been cancelled as the HRT has also said it is illegal? Why didn't the RCMP cancel the policy knowing this? It's interesting to learn the RCMP and other police forces being used for illegal acts? For Treasonable acts?
Reader, you are not allowed to be this naïve and pretend these people do not know what they are doing with falsifying documents to make them seem legal, therefore legal tender, and have ICBC, the RCMP and others use them.

The people that wrote the “notice of prohibition from driving a motor vehicle” knew and know the policy is illegal, as the notice is listed as “MV2636” and the three Sections listed on the back of the page are from the MVA.
These people deliberately and consciously re - wrote or contrived this legal document knowing the diabetic policy was/is illegal. They also know how many other medical conditions have not been proved as legal.
These people have deliberately deceived the users of the “notice”, the RCMP in my instance and every other Police force in B C. They are all using a document that has been presented by Martin as something legal, has legal tender to do things, where it reality it does not. It is Martin lying again, using his position in gov't to deceive that his Form is legal.
Martin is responsible for this fraud and other criminal acts concerning this, as he runs the OSMV and is paid the big dollar. He is the senior civil servant concerning driving and its policies and it is his job to know this about his intrusions into the public's life. The Superintendent is using his position of status, trust, power, and prestige in a deliberate action of fraud to deceive concerning this illegal policy concerning diabetics. If he will present stolen research under the Oath of an Affidavit why should we believe he has legally justified any medical conditions he is supposedly managing? In other words he is deceiving everyone about all the conditions this “notice” is supposed to be a legal document for and all the police agencies using this “notice” as a legal document, as this form is to be used for all medical conditions, not just diabetes.
The Deputy Superintendent is also responsible, as she runs these so called policies concerning medical conditions.

Reader, what about the Solicitor General who is supposed to be managing these civil servants and their involvement into this corruption, homicide, treason, and what we have just discovered, these counterfeit documents? What about their accountability and responsibility? How far do we go concerning the Solicitor Generals and their responsibility and accountability that have been in this office since I became type 2 diabetic in 1999, as the policy was illegal then? There has been 6 - 8 S Gs in this time, which begs the question, “How corrupt is this office?” I just learned, March 8, we have another S G, and Coleman has left without challenging Martin and his illegal policy and its consequences. What do we do with S Gs that do not stand up for Canada? For BC? What is this new S G going to do? What do you think she is going to do? Turn her back on the illegal policy, like the other S Gs? Condone the assault and rape? My death?

Lastly, the two letters I received from Superintendent Martin, December 24, 2010 and March 17, 2011 do not have a date of contrivance on them but it doesn't matter as Martin knows they are lies. He knew at the time of sending the policy was/is illegal and he still sent the threatening letters to me. They are threatening as he knows the policy is illegal and he is bullying as a means of defending the corruption he is involved in and bullying to show his control over the diabetic, his Niggers.
If the policy was legal the cancellation notice would be seen as only a consequence of non -compliance. This changes as the Superintendent knows this policy is illegal, which means his cancellation notice letters have a different meaning to them. He uses them as an illegal power instrument, as false documents, a ruse or charade to mislead concerning legal tender. He has bullied and harassed me with the December notice and with the March “Notice of Prohibition” he has assaulted and raped me. Martin has assaulted me as he has threatened me and implemented the attached consequence of the threat, knowing full well my license was cancelled.
When I said No to the new DME cycle and refused to acknowledge its legality he escalated his bullying, threats, and harassment to a new level of perversion. It became an assault and malice by using a contrived illegal document, his March 17 letter, the “Notice of Prohibition” to again cancel my license and denigrate my character for all to see as there are penalties associated with this new cancellation that I have not deserved or earned. I was not charged with anything, did not go to traffic court, was not evaluated by a judge and found guilty of anything. This constructed harm is malice. Martin wants to hurt me because I have exposed him, stood up to him, challenged his authority, and Niggers are not supposed to do that.
His actions with this Form have also denigrated the character and reputation of the RCMP, as they are using an illegal document to manage drivers. Doing so in good faith, believing that they do have the legal status to do so, and all the while Martin knows he is manipulating the RCMP and every other police force that uses the form, “NOTICE OF PROHIBITION FROM DRIVING A MOTOR VEHICLE” MV2636 (112005).
As with tickets and criminal cases that are found invalid by the courts for a technical mistake, wrong date, or spelling mistake how many license cancellations need to be found invalid due to this corruption by counterfeit legal documents by Martin? These two letters, the DME Form, and the “NOTICE OF PROHIBITION FROM DRIVING A MOTOR VEHICLE” MV2636 (112005) given to me by the RCMP constable are all Treasonable Acts.
Martin and his supporters have deep psychological or mental health issues and I'm afraid of them now.
 *
 
Temporary License Discrimination

I was just telling my neighbour about my license being canceled and the lies involved. He said his wife is needing to renew her license but is having a health issue, which impacts her face causing it to swell, so she does not want to have her picture taken. He went to the licensing department in Nanaimo, the same one I visited, and told his story and ICBC will be issuing a Temporary License for her that will last two months and by that time it is hoped that the swelling will have receding enough for the new picture that is needed. Sounds reasonable to me.

My point is, why wasn't I offered a Temporary License from ICBC, from Kathy Thomson, Director, Provincial Licensing who sent me the Notice of Cancellation, February 03, 2011?
Within my letter of March 4, 2011 I inform her that the policy is illegal, cannot do what it is alleged to be able to do, that the consequences are murder, maiming, and endangerment to life, that the policy and its DME have not offered any Good, and that I visit the doctor 20 times for the 1 time the OSMV forces me to go, which Martin refuses to acknowledge.
I also informed her that nothing had changed in my diabetes to change my classification from type 2 to type 1.
I also informed her to go to the BC HRT Decisions page and read the decision to learn from the BC HRT that the policy is illegal if she didn't believe my story.

My neighbour receives a Temporary License and not me? Why not? There was/is no bona fide reason to not give me a Temporary License knowing there are bona fide reasons of conflict concerning the Superintendent's personal demand I fulfill his arbitrary, his bullying, his harassment of me to complete a new cycle of DMEs. A temporary license until this is resolved should have been offered? I was not offered Equality and Inclusion in standard process. Why?
It's interesting that ICBC did not respond to my letter. They didn't like what they read about Martin's illegal policy and the corruption surrounding it? So, they pretend it doesn't exist? They didn't receive it?
So, they didn't like what I said and kicked it back to him? About me not acknowledging they have the legal right to cancel licenses and that I said I would keep driving? Why didn't ICBC clarify this for me? At least acknowledge there may be something wrong with the re - Classification from type 2 to type 1. Surely I'm not the only driver that has experienced this seemingly arbitrary change since the new Form of 2008. If I was the only one this should have been a huge flag that something was wrong and a Temporary license given until the OSMV explained my inquiry and complaint.

Martin did not respond to my question of why I had been reclassified from type 2 to type 1. He only mentioned that I may be still driving, that he is prohibiting me from driving, and for your own safety and that of others you must stop driving immediately. He said all this knowing his policy is illegal. He knows he and his policy and supporters are the liability, not the diabetic driver. He again reverses what is really happening by putting the harm upon someone else. He again refuses to acknowledge questions about what he is doing and why. Of course the Nigger has no Rights, so Martin only responded to rumors, and gossip that I was driving.
However, maybe ICBC did the right thing. They stepped back from a horror show and threw it back into the face of the guy that has then doing illegal things, or that is what we are lead to believe. Surely ICBC contacted Martin about this enlightenment of his corruption and their involvement. Maybe not as then they would be held responsible for further illegal cancellations. Now they absolutely know they have been abused and used as the fall guy or scapegoat for Martin's illegal policy and its horrific consequences. It's Martin that has refused me the equality and inclusion my neighbour experienced and probably hundreds or thousands of other drivers, as he did not acknowledge the inquiry of the re - Classification and went straight to the assault of the Nigger for exposing him to ICBC. This refusal of offer of a Temporary license is another act of Discrimination on his part.

My point is, “Why didn't I write the OSMV about this false demand, this harassment for a new cycle of DME?”
Why should I. Again, a third party was needed as direct contact with Martin is futile, as the above explains.
The real question you need to focus upon is, “Why didn't Martin acknowledge my inquiry into this cycle change, as he acknowledges he was contacted by someone or many about this?” We are lead to believe his spies contacted him.

My inquiry, reviews, and human rights discrimination complaints still have not included me within society, giving me Equality and Inclusion, the rights you have under the Charter, the HR Code, and the MVA. My Rights associated with these instruments of the democracy of Canada do not exist for me; this is has been proved. The two values are what Canadians work for, as what we want Canada to offer to all citizens. What has/is happening to me is not happening to you unless you have had someone die in emerge or needed to buy surgery like I did. You and I cannot write the OSMV and expect a bona fide response as it is corrupt, at least the senior managers are.

Reader, I know this is repetitive but what has happened to me must be reviewed to make connections and context I have the right to use a third party for intervention, because Martin and his supporters are corrupt, I have used the BC HRT, the BC Ombudsman, and now ICBC. ICBC did not respond, as the Ombudsman and BC HRT did, but seems to have thrown it back at Martin, as he responded with an assault.

The OSMV has lied about the legality of the policy since 1999; when I was diagnosed with type 2.
They have not fulfilled the demands of the Charter, the HR Code, the MVA, and their Oath of Office concerning this.
The policy is responsible for Emerge Overcrowding and the inordinate number of unexplained deaths, the maiming, and endangerment to life.
The consequences of the policy also change the availability to see G Ps causing clients to go to Emerge. Causing G Ps to leave this aspect of medicine.
The taxes that are shuffled to pay for the illegal policy and phoney humiliating DME is fraud and discriminating.
The taxes that are shuffled to pay for the DME, which cannot do what it is alleged to be able to do, and that is predict, prevent, and manage hypoglycemia, the very lie as the reason for the DME, and the consequent Labeling, Classification, and Registration of diabetics as killers and liabilities to society who are supposed to endanger the public's life. And none of this has been proved.
Reader, would you really keep writing these people or would you use a third party and have witness?

Our taxes should be used to pay for bona fide demands upon the Universal Health Care System, such as all those waiting for surgery. And what happens to those people while waiting one or two years for bona fide surgery? They become addicted to their medications, become maimed, or die. Or if fortunate enough, like me, buy spinal surgery so I didn't loose control of my lower bowels as a neurosurgeon advised me would happen if I didn't intervene. Then loose my legs due to complications. Then die in Emerge as Sinclair did. I may have become addicted to the medications.
I was going to wait for this to express, all for some blood lust and power control of corrupt senior civil servants? No thanks. Would you? The Newfoundland Labrador premier didn't. Thousands don't. The scope to this corruption is daunting and you wonder why Martin just assaulted me. And you are going to write him with no witness'? Knowing the stalking and killing of the Nigger comes next?
The OSMV, the Superintendent and Deputy Superintendent broke the Out of Court Settlement Agreement and played a charade with the Supervising lawyer for the Attorney General's office to cover it up. They then just kept running the policy as if legal. Running it against the demands of the Crown's demands. Again, this is Treason. And you are going to write them about a change in DME cycle?
The OSMV wrote a Draft of a Policy To Be for me to Review. Remember, there was no policy justifying the policy to begin with. This Draft is misleading as I was to review it, which meant the public would think I was comparing the Draft to an existing Policy, Reviewing for differences offered by the OSMV to deal with what I had challenged them about concerning the legality of the policy and its horrific consequences. A Draft which seems to be offering changes to the diabetic policy as promised. It is deceiving as who would believe there wasn't a Policy Paper concerning government intervention into our lives, its consequences, and what this intervention says about the diabetic and disabled.
Therefore, one would believe the Draft was a bona fide document concerning an already existing bona fide legal policy, which of course there never has been one, little lone being legal.
When reading the Draft one comes to understand that the unknown writers do not offer any science to justify the policy. This important legal protocol of Copyright, Intellectual Property Rights, and Intent of Use permission is not mentioned on purpose to deceive the reader into believing the policy has already been legally justified, therefore scientific documentation is not needed.
Secondly, the policy is based upon the consequences of diabetes and the Draft does not mention the consequences of the intervention. Again, this important fact is not mentioned with purpose to mislead and misinform. (It's just another charade to cover up the lack of a legal policy.)
Third, the authors do not mention the intervention, the DME, has ever been proved that it can do what it is alleged to be able to do.
Fourth, the authors do not mention that the intervention, the Policy and DME has done any Good.
Fifth, the authors do not mention diabetes already managed their diabetes with doctor care.
Interesting how they forgot to inform readers of the above.

Then there is the theft of scientific research, placed in an Affidavit, to deceive that the science was legal to use. Then the denial of the theft and breach of the Oath of Affidavit.
Then the lie about not knowing the scope of the discrimination complaint in an effort to decrease the the harm of theft, by withdrawing the research not concerned with type 2. It was all withdrawn, as they had no documents and new Affidavits would have been needed. This was a really slimy and sleazy move by these people.
Then the change of scope by the HRT to bury my complaint and any availability for future complaints.

Reader, you're going to write these people and expect an answer? This again falls back to the definition of insanity, keep asking the same question knowing the response, as nothing has changed. I'm not the one with mental health issues.

That was 2008 and still no policy paper legally justifying the policy and Martin and his corrupt supporters know the consequences of the policy harm diabetics, the universal health care system, and society. The killing continues. What's one more with me, the uppity Nigger that's causing conflict.
It goes on. And you expect me to write this corrupt person, this corrupt civil servant, that has put himself above the laws of Canada? The laws of Human Rights? A man who changes the wording of the MVA statutes or Sections to get his way? Would you write him? One needs to write third parties to expose him for what he is; to have witness. His response again exemplifies his bias, prejudice, hate, ignorance, fear and loathing, disgust, contempt, discrimination, corruption, and the illegal policy. He has moved to using assault and rape, using the resulting fear and shame to manage, to keep the Nigger in line.

My judgment of Martin and his policy is correct. ICBC did not send me a second letter concerning the cancellation of the license when I challenged them about the legality of their actions and legal rights to cancel my license. They should have given me a Temporary License. This act would not have hurt anyone. Why didn't they? Did Martin intervene with their process?
Martin's letter of March 17, 2011 states “I have information indicating that you may have driven during this cancellation.” He's pretending he has spies out there. Does he live in a James Bond movie or a Harry Potter movie. I wrote third parties on purpose knowing they would contact him especially the S G office, as it's supposed to manage him. Does he see the S G office as his personal spies? Does he have a satellite spy camera on me?
Again, as he knows about my letter to ICBC, the RCMP, the past S G, his boss, why didn't he offer a Temporary license, as I was asking the why of the type and cycle change. He couldn't even to that could he. Once again he pronounces his discrimination. It means he would need to acknowledge I have Rights and be Equal and Included, which would then pronounce me as Human and not his Nigger. And his corruption will not allow him to do that.

The above is also why Martin did not write me after someone contacted him about me confronting him again, as there would be another record or lies. He decided to assault me through bureaucratic 'means', as this would to seem to place him at arms length of his discrimination, harassment, assault, and rape. 'Means' he did not need to use, as I have not been found guilty of a crime only the refusal to comply with the new cycle of DME and he couldn't accept that statement of NO. And you're going to write to this person?
 *

 RCMP

Commissioner Elliot and Supervisor Burnside, you have been abused by the OSMV and Martin and other corrupt civil servants concerning Form MV2636 (112005). It is an illegal form, as stated above the wording of the MVA has been changed to mislead, misinform, and misrepresent what is really demanded by the sections of the MVA. As Martin used ICBC to do his Nazis Goon work, you have also been used.
To say the least it is against the law to change the wording of statutes of law, the Sections of the MVA, in order for people to deceive others, to make it seem as if they have the legal Right to do what they are doing. For corrupt civil servants to get their way. To have organizations such as the HRT, the public, ICBC, city police forces, and the RCMP do their bidding under false pretenses. And this is what Martin has done. He has lied to everyone leading you to believe his demands are legal, which he knows they are not, as Section 29 has never been fulfilled. Nor has Section 25 been fulfilled. He knows this instrument of law has been compromised and yet still dupes police forces to use it and the public to respect it.
The “NOTICE OF PROHIBITION FROM DRIVING A MOTOR VEHICLE” is an illegal document, a counterfeit of a legal document to be; contrived to mislead for benefit. (This counterfeit is no different than phoney money, documents in opposition to the Crown and used for illegal benefit). Elliot and Burnside the RCMP have used it for Government, the OSMV, the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles, Martin and Howie, so they can run their illegal policy against the Laws of Canada with organizations such as yours, abusing your trust, respectability and legal tender. You, the RCMP, and all other police forces are the naïve bystander here, laying down the law for the pubic to follow, as who would believe a citation such as this Form from the RCMP would be illegal. I certain didn't until I rolled it over to look at the Sections of the MVA the RCMP constable stated would give me direction as to what was happening with my license cancellation. I do not believe he knows it is an illegal document. As an RCMP he has been manipulated by Martin. He should sue Martin for injury to dignity and self respect, and public humiliation, little lone having him perform an illegal act.

How many of these illegal citations has the RCMP given out since November 2005? How many from city police forces throughout British Columbia? How many in Winnipeg's police force, as they also have diabetes laws and a public insurance company? How many lives changed illegally?
RCMP you have more that egg on your face with this. My letters to you about the stolen research, as you have a Dept that deals with Intellectual Property Rights theft, through default exposes that the policy is an illegal policy. I also mentioned the illegal DME Form, the breach of the Settlement Agreement, the breach of Oath of Affidavit, inter - provincial mail fraud and provincial mail fraud concerning the movement of the stolen research, etc, etc, etc and none of this was attended by you. You stated you did not think you could win a case against the gov't concerning the theft of scientific research. You conveniently forgot to address the illegal policy for which it was stolen for and its horrific consequences. Forgot to mention the breach of Affidavit. How the HRT changed the scope of my complaint without my permission, etc, etc.
Why did you do this? Why did you do this when you'll come after me if I drive, even though you know the policy is illegal and forms counterfeit?

If you had made an inquiry into this at that time instead of burying it you would have confronted the OSMV and its corrupt supporters and their illegal Forms, such as the lying, legally perverted DME Form. This may have had you investigate all forms put out by the OSMV at this time because you would have learned the Policy is illegal and the DME just another lie put forward by the OSMV and its corrupt senior civil servants. You are now a few years to late. But here it is again, with you intimately involved now, as you are passing counterfeit documents for the OSMV. You are now involved in supporting a gov't policy running in opposition to the demands of the Crown, which is Treason, and passing documents used to support that Treason.
So, how many lives have been changed illegally due to your refusal to investigate corruption in the Solicitor General's office, the Attorney General's office, the Ministry of Health, and others? And now they have assaulted me because they learned you had turned your back to them; you condoned what they are doing and they learned this.
How many court cases involving cancellation of license are now invalid due to illegal gov't forms?
How many lives could have been saved if the policy had been canceled through an investigation by the RCMP? How many Sinclairs and Kirkness' may have been saved if the illegal gov't policies had been stopped, therefore their consequences stopped and Overcrowded Emerge facilities changed for Good? Chief McCaskill and his Investigation and the lawyers involved need to ask you two about this.
How many people have been maimed due to long wait times for surgery due to lack of funding. How many are addicted to their medications due to the long wait times for surgery?
How many people like me would not have needed to buy private health care because Martin is using our taxes to pay for his demands of his illegal policy that you turned your back on?

RCMP you seem to have put yourself beyond these criminal activities for some reason. You have turned your back to this assault upon our Constitution, the HR Code, the MVA,and senior civil servant's Oath of Office. These people are monsters in our society and you need to attack them, as they have attacked you and used you.
Retribution is ok. There isn't many of them that need to be fired. Benefiting all Canada.
You are not beyond their criminal activities now. You are intimately involved. As are all other police forces in BC. These corrupt civil servants and their illegal policy and illegal documents have been using you to be their goon. As this has now been brought forward you need to understand this as an attack upon you personally, which has compromised your status and authority in Canada. The RCMP constable that gave the citation did so in good faith, not as a penalty, as Martin did. Martin knows a RCMP constable would be doing this. He knows the constable's position of status, trust, power, and prestige would be acknowledged by the public, as well intended or legal This constables actions have been compromised. He has been abused and assaulted, just as ICBC has been, just as I have been.
Now you are involved in the corruption of Canada and its police forces by Martin, Howie, and their supporters.
And never forget Hunt, Supervising lawyer for the Attorney General's office, as she runs all this and has been involved since at least 2002 - 2004 with my initial inquiry or 2004 - 2006 when a lawyer named Lee paraphrased the Sections of the MVA giving the Superintendent carte blanch to do what she or he wants, which is not true. She lied and falsified a legal document to mislead the reader concerning the power of the Superintendent. Hunt knows she is running this policy in opposition to the demands of the Crown, she played a charade to hide the broken settlement agreement, she's legally responsible for presenting the stolen research in the Affidavit, as she manages all gov't interaction with the public, she knows the policy is illegal, etc, etc. Her position in law makes her responsible for knowing the law and if law has been changed. She knows these Forms are illegal, as by default it is her duty and obligation to know. Her behaviour, involvement in this illegal policy jeopardizes all legal cases she has been involved in since she stuck her face into my life concerning this policy and its consequences. It impacts all the cases she's involved in today. All cases in front of gov't today need to be informed of her involvement in this. They need to know she has condoned an illegal gov't policy and presented corrupted Affidavits.
*
Why I have complied with the DME

I've complied with the demands of the OSMV because if I didn't the opposition in this argument would stand up and say I did not give the OSMV enough time to fulfill the Demands of the Charter, the Human Rights Code, the Motor Vehicle Act and the demands of their Oath of Office and I wouldn't be driving; policy legal or not. They have no credibility with this lie about me not giving them enough time, as the HR Code came about in 1978, the Charter in 1982, the amended MVA of 1996, and the Oath of Office has always been there. I've been inquiring since 2002.
Reader, if you don't think these criminals would say this you are naïve beyond sentiment.
Secondly, as the OSMV and its supporters are corrupt I knew there would be consequences of not fulfilling the illegal demand of the DME, as every time I have engaged the OSMV over the past years their behaviour has become more corrupt, more perverted, and the list of criminal activities increased. And now the consequences have expresses as an assault and rape.
Reader, this was coming wasn't it. Again, you can't be naïve about this escalation.
Third, I don't have millions of dollars to take corrupt gov't to court and knew I would need another instrument to confront them and expose these criminals to the public and to the world, which would take time and it is.
Fourth, by complying with the illegal policy and its phoney DME I was rejuvenated in my quest for my Charter Rights, Human Rights, Motor Vehicle Rights and the work needed to help save our UHCS. To experience a phoney medical examination rejuvenates one, as one knows you are being Labeled, Classified, Forced to under go a phoney medical examination, and will be registered for the rest of your life as a liability, all for some Nazi civil servants in a wonderful country such as Canada and that is worth the humiliation of subjection to the Nazi medical examination and its deliberate humiliating harm. Harm to keep the Nigger in his place. To drive home the lie that I'm a liability to society and myself. And yet, I have not done anything nor have been proved to have done anything.
Reader, there is always the other half of something. The other side is the Harm to the monsters themselves, they have expressed their perverted sense of life. Their bias, prejudice, hate, ignorance, fear and loathing, disgust, contempt, and discrimination for not only the diabetic, the disabled, and people of difference but their absolute rejection of Democracy and Human Rights. They care nothing for Life.
This is worth while to do, to expose these people. It has great value in it.

I decided it would be interesting to see what expressed itself this time. It must be remembered that once one is screwed by a bureaucracy or something like the OSMV and its senior civil servants, or gov't it is very hard to get someone to undo what was done to a person challenging the gov't, so those doing the harassment do so knowing this, knowing they are at arms length, knowing they will not be held accountable. This happens especially to someone that challenged the gov't and its illegal policy and its consequences; someone like me.
As stated above, a few years ago someone changed my Classification of type 2 and a five year examination cycle back to a two year cycle. I complained about this and it was corrected. This is the second time, but this is different. Experiencing the above direct contact with the OSMV is futile, so one tries something else, bring a third party in. I can not go to the HRT, as it buried my complaint until the OSMV publishes a Policy Paper on all medical conditions it supposedly manages. This HRT decision declares the diabetic policy is illegal, as well as all other demands because they acknowledged the OSMV has no Policy Paper making those demands legal.
So, to protect what rights I have left I'm forced to get a lawyer? How much is that when taking on corrupt gov't? More than I have and the OMSV knows this, as I represented myself in the past two HRT Discrimination complaints.
So, I brought ICBC into the inquiry. Told them the truth about the illegal policy. So, what happened. We have discovered how Martin has contrived documents pretending they are legal tender, given them out as legal tender, which has manipulated ICBC and the RCMP, and every other police force in BC, and almost me, except I know Martin and his supporters are corrupt.
So, I have discovered more corruption concerning this illegal policy and corrupt civil servants, which I can now inform the RCMP, police forces, UN, Human Rights Watch, the Press, lawyers, and the Sinclair Investigation. This is important for Winnipeg also, as if I'm correct they also have a public Insurance Corporation for driving and a diabetes policy, which will be the same as in BC, which means in all probability their policy is illegal, their so called legal documents from their equivalent OSMV may also be falsified documents to make them seem legal tender.
With this newly discovered corruption in hand I decided it was time for me to comply with the DME and get my license back and continue my fight for my Charter Rights, my Human Rights, my Motor Vehicle Rights, the Right I have that senior civil servants are obeying their Oath of Office, even when no one is watching, and the fight for our Universal Health Care System. And what did I discover? Martin has assaulted and raped me with his illegal “Notice of Prohibition” and now I'm Labeled and Classified as a Criminal and will need to be reviewed by unknowns who are Martin's colleagues. Another phoney examination that may continue on for ever to teach the Nigger his place.
Reader, do you believe the Reviewers are at arms length of Martin and his corruption? How did they get their positions? Which way is Martin facing them?
*

Something else that is really sick here

Four out of ten adults in Canada are functioning illiterate; that's about 12 or 13 million people. They work hard, run business', pay their taxes, and believe what is done to them by gov't is bona fide and legal. That means they trust that the laws of Canada are being fulfilled, as they fulfill their obligations. These people could not do what I am doing. They are all being abused by people like Martin, Howie, Hunt, the academic researcher Dobbs, and the other educated supporters of this illegal policy and the shuffle of our taxes to pay for it. They just believe it is legal and they comply.
They are also being abused by those that are educated and have not confronted the illegal policy and its horrific consequences after I have exposed this corruption to them.
These functioning illiterate could not defend themselves against an attack such as Martin's has done to me. Who has a million dollars to take gov't to court, and Martin and Hunt know this. Martin is absolutely breaking his Oath of Office and the Trust associated with being a gov't employee.
Solicitor General, why do Howie, Dobbs, Hunt, and Martin still have employment with the gov't? Six or seven Solicitor Generals have been forced to leave office and are being investigated for less corrupt behaviour, all just alleged acts, where all this is concrete. Fire these people and do the civil service a favour, by culling out a virus, a disease in your Ministry. Your Ministry is the “Ministry of Public Safety”; make BC safe from your staff. Make it safe from corruption in your office. Cancel this policy and save lives, as the policy only kills and has not been proved to do anything Good.
*

PART 2
A second discovery concerning my Refusal to be Superintendent Martin's “Nigger on a Stick and Chain” and complete a Driver's Medical Examination when not needed.
*

***
Reader, I know this is repetitive but what has happened to me must be reviewed to make connections and context, as this is new and history needs to replayed for the Reader to understand the why of how we got here. Have patience.
***

Applying for the Renewal of my Driver's License; More HATE, HARASSMENT, and CORRUPTION

Again, I was pleased with Winnipeg's Chief of Police McCaskill's colleague for inquiring about my contact with them, it really was wonderful as he/or she is in denial of what is happening, shaken to think this really is happening in Canada, by people in trusted positions, people that have swore an Oath of Office to obey the Law, do no harm, steal, lie, mislead, misrepresent, and misinform and they have all done this. This is coming from not stereotypical gangs or gangsters, but white collar gangsters in government. People that care nothing for the laws of Canada and support and bury what each does, that care nothing for the consequences of their actions, and protect each other, as these people do.
Reader, you have just learned how Martin has contrived documents to seem to have legal tender and passed them about to be used as legal tender, to not only manipulate the receiver, but the giver, ICBC, the RCMP, and other police forces do his illegal demands or criminal activity.
Every time I have engaged the OSMV their behaviour has worsened. However, I was not prepared for the documents he has falsified as legal tender to manipulate ICBC, police forces, and the RCMP. He's a real piece of work isn't he. But monsters are.
After discovering this about the documents it has given me more illegal or criminal activity to report to another new Solicitor General, the Winnipeg police, the Press, UN, universities, the RCMP and now hopefully the RCMP contact all police forces concerning the illegal Form their constable gave me. Surely they have a legal obligation to do that?

My point is, what follows is as wonderful as Chief McCaskill's colleague contacting me and the discovery of falsified legal documents contrived and distributed by Martin.
The Hate, Bitterness, Vindictiveness, Retribution, Pettiness, etc, etc is spectacular to say the least. These people that are doing this to me, therefore 430 000 diabetics in BC, all the other disabled, and people they do not like are real monsters.
With this new discovery concerning more illegal documents that supports my case to cancel the policy I decided to complete the DME and renew my licence, as Thomson's letter of February 03, 2011 stated I could;
“When you have met the requirement, allow a few days for it to be received by the Superintendent.”

and then apply for the license. I did so.

Again, on April 04, 2011 I went to renew my license, as it had been cancelled due to none compliance, not by a criminal charge or activity. No evaluation of my skills and abilities to drive. Just that I withdrew my compliance, withdrew what was needed for me to have the privilege to drive.
Again, I was told by the licensing office that they could not renew my license. They asked why my license was cancelled. I told them, and why I challenged Martin and his false demand that I do the DME every year, that I am a type 2 on a five year cycle, not a type 1 diabetic and a one year cycle. Nothing of this was recorded for the staff to comment upon.
I was told the cancellation was not a “NOTICE OF CANCELLATION”, but a “NOTICE OF PROHIBITION”. (Martin's highlight and increased letter size.) I was told that ICBC does not have the authority to renew my license even if the DME was completed, as I had done the week before. I said there is something really wrong here and I asked for a Temporary license, as my neighbour had received; temporary until this problem was resolved, which it was according to ICBC request, as I had completed the DME demand.
I produced the original DME Form and ICBC phoned and faxed the DME Form to someone to make sure it was the same as what I had said the medical clinic had sent to ICBC. It was. Whom ever it was they then directed the ICBC staff member to someone else and were informed that as the Superintendent had upgraded or increased the charge against me, from Cancellation to Prohibition that ICBC could not give or renew my license or give me a Temporary license. That there would be an investigation concerning me, that the cost for a new license would be $250, (a Reinstatement of license), that the new license would only last for two years, and I would be Reviewed again, and that I was to take the DME every year.
I could not believe what was being said to me. Then I realized I was being punished, the uppity Nigger on the Chain and Stick being put into his place, that harm and retribution had begun to show who's Boss.

I asked again why I could not have a Temporary license until this problem was resolved. I was again informed no license could be offered with the charge of Prohibition. I was asked if I had done something else to evoke the Prohibition. I responded that I had not. I was turned into a Criminal, and didn't know why. If you want to be Humiliated this is it. If you want to be Humiliated in the Public Space this is it. Martin turned me into a Criminal for his reasons only and the staff at ICBC knew it. They also realized that I just came to understand this. That I had absolutely no control over this and neither did they. That Martin had really assaulted me. Had raped me. And he was now teaching a lesson
What did I really do? It had nothing to do with driving. I challenge the Superintendent, informed ICBC they are being used , as his Nigger to do his goon work, inform them about the illegal policy and its harm, and now he has exposed me to the world of a criminal, a charge against my driving record and I'm to be investigated. This is Hate. This is Discrimination. This is Harassment. This is Vindictiveness. This is Malice. My complaint is Valid, his are not.
The Hate of Martin and his supporters have for the diabetic or disabled is amazing. But the Hate and Retribution they have for someone like me that confronts them and exposes them to the world is expected isn't it; one just doesn't know the when and how.
Reader, you cannot allow your naïvety to not expect something like this, especially if and when they had the opportunity to hide it in something such as this. A phoney change in Class type as hey knew I complained before.

My point is, this is another excellent example of what I have written about before concerning these people and what they are doing and how they blame the other guy to redirect about what to focus upon, where the right hand is doing something but the left is doing something else; the redirect and refocus to manipulate. Another example of blame the other guy, so attention is redirected, as to whom is really wrong or the criminal.
Martin and his supporters have set me up as the Criminal now, the Notice of Prohibition and its public record of me as having a Prohibition, meaning I am to be reviewed by unknowns to make decisions whether or not I am a harm to myself and a harm to society. And on the other hand it is they who are the criminals with the illegal policy, the killing, the maiming, the breach of the settlement agreement, theft of science, lies concerning this, falsifying the MVA sections, etc, etc, and now the above falsifying of documents to be used as legal tender, and a DME that cannot do what it is alleged to be able to do.
*

Solicitor General and RCMP

My point is, Solicitor General and RCMP, after my letter to the RCMP, ICBC, and the Solicitor Generals office and others about the Superintendent's phoney demand for a DME why wasn't the demand for me to complete a new DME cancelled, as I explained there was no change to my Classification of type 2? Canceled until my complaint was resolved, as there is no driver mishap problem, no drunk driving charges, or anything else?
Not only is ICBC a third party but the S G office is also, as it supposedly manages the OSMV and Martin. Martin's statement that he has “information indicating that you may have driven” is silly to say the least. He should know what I wrote, as I wrote his boss, the S G and it probably just dumped in his lap to resolve, especially now we know Coleman has left and de Jong before him and neither attended to this. And ICBC should have also contacted him. Maybe the RCMP also. Hopefully the UN dept of Prevention of Genocide. We are lead to believe Martin thinks he's in a James Bond movie with a secret informer or a Harry Potter book with magic.
Reader, these third parties were supposed to contact him, you know that. They are witness. This silly statement of his that he has secret “information indicating that you may have driven” begs the question;
“How far has Martin fallen from reality?”

So, Martin, in his world of Hate and dreams of grandeur, he uses rumors and gossip to assault and rape me, the uppity Nigger, to put me back into the place he has constructed for me. Where's reality here? What has happened to Canada's laws of innocent until proved guilty? Of investigating gossip and rumor before intervention? What's happened to our laws concerning this policy? But of course Martin has learned he does not need to obey the Laws of Canada, he's allowed to harm who he wants, without consequences.
Reader, there was no change to the medications I was using, as I had been using Lantus, an insulin supplement, since 2006 and the OSMV knew this and why type 2s use Lantus.
That the OSMV knows type 2s use Lantus to supplement their insulin production, which does not re - Classify them as type 1.
Why didn't Martin address this? Again, Martin cannot acknowledge the diabetic has Rights, as it will debunk, break his construction of diabetic as Pariah, the Other, the Nigger, so he uses Fiction, gossip and rumor, to base his actions upon. Martin uses Fiction to base his world upon, as Fiction needs to make sense or it won't work. Martin and his supporters live in a dream world, a world of fiction doing what they want, but killing, maiming, and harming the real world.

My point is, as I did not complete the DME, ICBC cancelled my license. That's all there is to do. They did their job. Their job is not to babysit citizens. There should not have been any more contact with me, unless a second letter is standard protocol after a challenge such as mine. There wasn't any second contact from ICBC. Much to my dismay but then that would mean they are involved, which I don't think they want to be.
However, did they contact Martin concerning my letter of March 4, 2011. To question him about the legality of the policy? The consequences that kill, maim, and endanger life? The theft of science? The breach of Affidavit? The breach of the settlement agreement? The abuse of ICBC, having ICBC doing goon work for Martin's illegal policy? Asking how many illegal acts they have done for him? How many licenses cancelled under false pretenses?

Martin did not need to intervene, his liability was complete, as ICBC cancelled my license as demanded by the OSMV protocol; legal or not, and as it is illegal and now they know this they naïvely did his goon work for him.
Why was there contact from him to me, as ICBC set the precedent of canceling my license and no further contact?
Why did he decided to intervene and make me a criminal, as if I had been driving? Knowing the consequences.
Did he have any proof I had been driving? He mentions nothing but Fiction, gossip and rumor.

He did this because of Hate, to be Vindictive, for Retribution for exposing him and his corruption to ICBC and the world. This is how he could get at me. This is just another charade he is playing and I have caught him at it. Another charade of hurt and deception.
Martin should not have contacted me unless I had been driving and caught doing so? Contact only after it had been proved I had broken the “Notice of Cancellation” from ICBC. Or proved I had done a criminal act. I've done nothing, but say NO.
Why did Martin contact me again? If anything he may have wanted to contact me with a letter to advise me that my license was cancelled no matter what I had presented to ICBC about his corrupt behaviour and illegal policy? He didn't do this. What Right does he have to turn me into a criminal for not renewing my license? That's all I did. That's the real world. I just said NO.
He knows I can read. He knows I am a law abiding citizen, as I have no criminal charges or Motor Vehicle charges. He knows I'm a law abiding citizen as I've been fighting for my Charter Rights, Human Rights, and Motor Vehicle Act Rights since 2002, that he has taken away from me, and not done anything criminal to bring this to the Press or World. He knows my license was cancelled. It is not his job to babysit citizens that he thinks may be driving. How many other people has he done this to? Does he do this to all drivers that have had their license cancelled? The police or ICBC will contact him if something comes their way. What he did was Personalize this, he used his Government Position and Government Stationary to do his Personal wants, to harm a person that has challenged him and exposed him; that's against the law.

So, why did he give a “Notice of Prohibition” knowing what it does to me; makes me a criminal, I will not have a license for a month at least until the Review, I must have a “Review” of who I am and what I did, it will cost me $250 for the Review about Prohibition, and it will cost me $31 for a two year license, which then I again must have a Review of who I am and what I have been doing because of Martin's illegal classification of me as a Criminal. I have no idea of how long this will go on. This additional notice was done to Hurt me. To hurt the uppity diabetic, the uppity Nigger.
Martin has turned me into his Nigger on a Stick and Chain again, making me dance to his tune of corruption; but only making me if I do not complain, do not expose his perversions and sickness to the world; without public acknowledgment he again goes unchallenged with his corruption and criminal behaviour.
Reader, I can say what ever I want to ICBC and it doesn't warrant a “Notice of Prohibition” from them or Martin, it doesn't warrant a “Notice of Cancellation” from ICBC, it warrants no penalty from anyone. It warranted an investigation.
I can say what ever I want to Martin and it does not warrant a “Notice of Prohibition”. Martin is the third party here and he gives me a “Notice of Prohibition” for something I said to someone else. What I said about the Policy is Right, therefore the cancellation is not legal. It is a counterfeit document to an illegal policy. Martin also knows this. So, he came after me hard as he could right now, with assault and rape and by turning me into a Criminal for saying NO.
Reader, you don't think I should worry about my life now his aggressiveness is in the Public Space and hands on?
This begs the question; “What is he doing to his staff?”, “What does he do to his wife, or kids, or companion if they dare say NO?” and “What's he doing behind closed doors, as we know what he is doing outside.”

Secondly, as with civil disobedience, someone confronting something in passive mode, one must respond in kind, “If you really do that there will be consequences”. You do not stomp and rape the person, you do not hammer the person as hard as you can in a sick and twisted effort to rule by violence and fear, as Martin did. The staff at ICBC also knew this.
This is Hate.
This is Harassment
This is Humiliation.
This is Denigration of my Character.
This is Injury to my Dignity.
This is Injury to my Self - Respect.
This is deliberate conscious behaviour to Harm someone.
This is Malice.
This is a breach of our laws by labeling me a criminal and acting upon it, when there is no such evidence I have done any wrong. Saying NO is not wrong.
This is another breach of the Motor Vehicle Act, as he doing things to me he has not proved that he has the Right to do.
This is another breach of the Charter, as he is gov't sticking his face into my life without proof of need.
This is another breach of the Human Rights Code, as what he has done to me is not bona fide and reasonably justified.
This is another breach of Martin's Oath of Office, which is to Obey the Law, do not Harm, do not Lie, do not Steal, do not Mislead, do not Misrepresent, do not Misinform, do not use your Position in Government for personal gain, etc.

My point is, why wasn't the fact that I have the Right “Not” to drive acknowledged? The Right “Not” to fulfill the illegal policy's demand and not drive anymore? Why wasn't this very real decision drivers make not acknowledged by Martin?
His Hate would not allow him to accept that I may be doing this. He just came after me and has listed me as a criminal because I stepped up to him again and exposed his criminality to ICBC and again to the world.
He came after me because I said NO to him.
What is he going to do after ICBC gets a copy of this letter, exposing to them what Martin did after they contacted him about me saying No, if that is what they did? How are his spies to contact him this time?
This hateful act is now on my driver's license history for all to see; not only Canada but the USA and European countries I may visit again. The ICBC licensing office I visited accessed my license history and it's there for public view and public record. The ICBC employee that I was working with expressed how serious this Classification was. Very serious. I couldn't believe what I was hearing but they I understood it was deliberate, retributive, absolute malice.

Reader, I have the Right 'Not' to drive. I have the Right, Not to participate in Martin's corruption, bias, prejudice, hate, ignorance, fear and loathing, disgust, and contempt of the disabled and his absolute contempt for the laws that Canada. I have the Right to choose to drive or not, and if there is a DME or not that I must conform to, whether legal or not, I can make the choice to conform or not. Martin is not only saying I don't have this Right but he has penalized me for doing so.
Reader, how far has his Hate and Corruption taken him now?

Who says I wasn't canceling my license after eight years of fighting for my Charter Rights, Human Rights, and Rights under the MVA, which Martin has corrupted for his own greed, power, hate, and lust and I didn't have the Right to do so? With society and the RCMP afraid to confront this corruption, maybe, just maybe, I had had enough. I'm not allowed to do this? Who says?

Who says this fact, “Not driving” is not allowed to be acknowledged before someone is labeled a criminal? Who says I'm to be labeled a Criminal for “Not driving”? How insane is Martin? What's his Review board going to do with this fact?
If Martin was really interested in my welfare, as a diabetic driver, he would have exhausted all avenues before doing what he did. He didn't because he saw this as a way for retribution, for vindictiveness, to show his power, absolute disrespect for Law, and his sexual potency, his sexual dominance.
This is another example of how I've been turned into the Pariah, the Other, the Nigger, when he did not even acknowledge that I am allowed to think and act for myself, and say NO. That they, the owners of the Nigger, will tell me if I drive or not. And since I would not conform to their demands, and thought and acted for myself, I have been illegally penalized physically, financially, socially, and emotionally.
Reader, and you don't think Martin and his supporters are twisted, corrupt and have mental health issues?

My point is, Martin consciously chose to limit his acknowledgment of what I had written to ICBC, that I did and still do not acknowledge the legal right of ICBC to cancel my license and that 'I would continue to drive'. This challenge did not elicit a response from ICBC, which I hoped it would. That they would investigate this illegal policy, as they are being used by the OSMV to enforce demands of the OSMV and its illegal and harmful policy.
Martin responded with a focus on 'I would continue to drive', nothing else. We know by his response to me, the NOTICE OF PROHIBITION, he chose not to acknowledge I complained that the re - Classification of me to a type 1 was not warranted. This means that he selectively chose what to acknowledge and what not to. Acknowledging that I complained about the re -Classification would give me, a diabetic, the Right to be heard, to have Equality and Inclusion in process, in Canada, what non - diabetics are afforded; this would break his social construct of the diabetic as a Pariah, the Other, the Nigger, who has no Rights, as Martin's failure to fulfill the Charter, the HR Code, and the MVA proves.
His choice of focus only acknowledges that someone who I wrote to informed him, but did not Officially inform him with the letter, but tattletaled, gossiped, blabbermouthed, and spread rumors that I stated I may continue or will continue to drive; or as he implies his spies turned me in. Gossip and rumors means he did not read my letter to ICBC and the S G, which means he based his attack, assault, and rape of me on rumor and gossip. Very sick stuff. Wouldn't the S G office pass the letter on, as Martin is supposed to be running a department? They can't be that dysfunctional. Protective but not that dysfunctional to not pass it on and besides de Jong and Coleman were leaving. But, he pretends his spies told him about me? What about this letter? Will he say Martians contacted him?
No acknowledgment of the re - Classification. Why? Because he has already hurt me with the re - Classification to type 1, something which I am not, like being a Nigger, which means yearly DME, and another example of his power, which needs not be examined again, as he has spoken and acted. He doesn't want to diminish that harm. Which means he controls my Classification. He gets to Classify Humans to his liking. And I'm not his Nigger? In his mind I am?

My point is, again, someone was supposed to have contacted Martin, but Martin presents it as gossip, turning me in, tattletales, etc, with no acknowledgment that the contact was supposed to happen. Is this beyond him to understand this? To acknowledged this? Embarrassing as maybe the last S G threw it back at him? Loosing face? That's always a good reason to attack, assault, and rape someone. Humiliate them as he has humiliated himself, but blames me.

My point is, I've been questioning this policy since 2002 and have always obeyed the law and completed the DME, knowing this policy is illegal and the DME does not do what it is alleged to be able to do. Knowing that not complying would see my license cancelled until compliance. This time I challenged Martin, as I see this as Harassment, which is different than just complying while challenging the illegal policy. You must remember that I am not 'now' allowed to challenge the policy through the BC HRT until a Policy Paper concerning all medical conditions supposedly managed by the OSMV is published, which was supposed to happen in 2007 then 2008. The BC HRT was corrupted some how, blackmailed, bribed, or threatened, as how is it they know the policy is illegal and harmful, the science presented was stolen then withdrawn, changed the Scope of my complaint, and still they gave the OSMV an indefinite time to legalize the policy? So, how can I continue the challenge for my Rights if I don't know what the consequences are? Therefore, the refusal to comply under these new circumstances. By not driving and walking, busing, there are savings of $20 a day or more just for not having a car, insurance, gas, repairs, tuneups, etc. Seems reasonable.
According to Martin I'm not allowed to do this? I'm not allowed to do this without having the Prohibition on my license record, even though I do not have a license now? On there years after I have stopped driving? Martin knows this.

I also wanted to see what would happen if I said NO to this phoney change in my Classification. To stand up to his threats again and his corruption.
According to Martin I'm not allowed to do this.

I was Right to challenge Martin, as he really has again exposed himself, as to his criminal behaviour and mental health issues. What does he do, he immediately proclaims I am driving, therefore a criminal. He knows he's wrong and knows the harm being done. This is why it's Malice.
Saying NO, means NO. The NO to the demand of an unexplained demand for a new cycle of DME does not mean that I am driving. Saying NO means there is something wrong and needs investigating and that is why I used a third party. A third party, a third party as Witness, so the corrupt OSMV would not just do as they please with no explanation of why they are doing this to me, as has been established by their behaviour since 2002.
Complaining to the BC Ombudsman is a long drawn out process and they have severe restrictions, as to what they can do concerning gov't policy, as I discovered with an earlier contact.

I've asked the RCMP to investigate and they have also buried this.
They may wish they didn't bury this after giving out thousands of illegal, or counterfeit, supposedly legal Notice of Prohibition From Driving a Motor Vehicle forms. These are illegal transactions done by the RCMP. There is no excuse of naïvety, as it is their job to know what they are doing with tickets, citations, or notices such as was given to me. So, as a Canadian, Canada and I will see what they do this time. Will they bury their own abuse and challenge to their authority?

ICBC is supposed to be arms length away from the OSMV, so they can do the demands of the OSMV and are involved in this new inquiry of mine. So, that is what I did, used a third party, but Martin chose to step in and Harass and Attack me, set me up as a Criminal, cancel my license again but with a very severe charge, force me through an investigation about my license, but not acknowledge his behaviour, his illegal policy, or the false re - Classification.
It's an interesting lack of responsibility on ICBC's behalf; they want the power but take no responsibility for their behaviour. Similar to people working for Nazis, or those in Bosnia, and Rwanda, or in the behavioral experiments listed above, they defended themselves by stating , 'they told me to do this and that, so I did it'.
It's Discrimination and Prejudice, as they use others, as the accountability factor for what they do. It's not good enough. ICBC should have the legal right to attack anyone, any entity for fraud even if it is gov't, as they represent the Public and the Public invented Government.
This brings us back to the three Experiments listed above; blame the other guy, prejudice, and conformity.

My point is, a modern, well - deserved fear of being registered within a huge government bureaucracy and the problem of how to get out once found within, whether legal or not, is where I am now.
This is what Martin has done to me; illegally charged me with some thing, acted upon that lie, and now I'm within the computer system and who takes me out? Not Martin or ICBC. Some low level civil servant who is not going to get the 'Order to Delete' the Notice of Prohibition because Martin and his supporters are going to stonewall and delay, as they have done with this policy. Any change brought about by me, the Nigger, is offensive and contrary to their “view” of life, therefore the 'order to delete' will be challenged by any means. Reader, you cannot be naïve that this won't happen.
Again, I am now within a huge government bureaucracy where gov't cares nothing for the Public's needs, as it doesn't need to, as they are not held responsible or accountable, so they care nothing for the public, as this corruption surrounding this diabetic policy proves.
So, he doesn't offer anything of recognition of my inquiry into the re - Classification of type 2 to type 1, or a letter offering any inquiry into my inquiry, or a cancellation of the demand for the new DME, or a cancellation of the Notice of Cancellation, or a Temporary license until this is resolved? He only states he has information. He sounds like the cartoon character Homer Simpson. He's got “inn fourmm aaachonn” about what I said to someone else and its a secret who told him. Are you kidding me.
He offers no recognition of my inquiry, he goes the opposite direction and Maximizes the Harm he can do to me right now. That of Notice of Prohibition, which is on my record and introduces penalties as if I had killed someone, or stole cars, or not paid insurance, or was guilty of multiple counts of drunk driving, or multiple counts of speeding, or counts of driving with no license. That notice is a very real penalty, as if I had been driving with or without a license and proved to be a criminal.
He did not prove I had driven. He has not stated he has seen me driving. He has no ticket that I was driving. He has no accident report that I was driving. He only has his perverted “view” of life. He only knows I have challenged ICBC about his illegal policy and that now he has the opportunity to harm me; he has intentionally done so. Now you see me as a criminal and believe so as the OSMV and Martin have told you so. Just as legal as the Policy and all his forms listed above.
Hold it. Hold it. Martin and his supporters are the criminals, not me.
This is another example of a charade played out to have me on the right hand as a criminal but on the left hand it is he that is the criminal. This is just another charade of Martin's to protect himself from what he is doing, to redirect your perception, therefore thinking, about what is really happening.

My point is, although he has harmed me it is he that is harmed also, as he exposed himself again, to his criminal behaviour, and his Hate of the diabetic, the disabled, and those that dare to confront him and expose him. What is this doing to his mental health?

My point is, hundred of thousands of type 2s use Lantus or similar insulin supplements to manage their type 2. How many other type 2s have had this change of type change done illegally? Done without their consent or opportunity of an inquiry into the change? Am I the only one that has experienced this illegal change? How many other type 2s are in conflict and is Martin doing this to them? Or is it only me?
Again, Lantus is used as an alternative to hypoglycemia causing pills or pill medication. It is safer and healthier for the diabetic. The use of those pill medications does not mean type 2s are changed to type 1. The alternative does mean a change in Classification of type. Of course if the OSMV in now changing what classifies as a type 1 then they should inform the diabetic, diabetic organizations, producers of medications, insurance companies managing health care, and of course doctors. This is not happening. So, the change from type 2 to type 1 has been deliberate, with consequences that are absolutely corrupt to say the least.

My point is, isn't Martin and his corrupt supporters working on, expecting, 'attrition' to impact me, concerning their illegal policy, and hoping they are not charged with Genocide and corruption before their pension times come about? You bet they are. You don't think there is stonewalling happening with my inquiry? With the Policy? I began this in 2002. No policy yet.
Reader, how would you feel if I caught you doing what Martin is doing? Would you want to kill me for exposing you?
*

Who is to Review My “Type” of Diabetes?

My point is, “Who” is going to Review my Classification of what type of diabetes I have now? Martin? Some corrupt civil servant that is already involved in this illegal policy? Some corrupt civil servants that knows nothing about diabetes? Some corrupt civil servants that are ordered to do what Martin tells them to do? Some brow beaten civil servants that are ordered to do what Martin and his supporters tells them what to do?

My point is, are those that are doing the Review going to be informed the policy is illegal?
That Martin's DME, the intervention, cannot do what it is alleged to be able to do, and that is predict, prevent, and managed hypoglycemia.
That the consequences of the intervention, the DME, causes the Emerge Overcrowding, long waits to see a G P, long waits for surgery, problems with ambulatory delivery, and responsible for the killing, maiming, and endangerment to life?
That Martin has not proved there is any Good coming from the intervention?
That diabetics do care for themselves without this illegal policy and phoney DME. That diabetics, such as me, visit the G P every three months for diabetic care, or (20) twenty times in a five year cycle compared to the ( 1 ) once forced visit of the DME, and the OSMV has never acknowledged diabetics care for themselves, with doctor care, with doctors freely working with diabetics to help manage their disease, where the gov't forces G Ps do comply with the demand to complete the DME?
That Martin stole research, put it in an Affidavit to purposely mislead about its legality, just as he has done with the above supposedly legal documents? That Martin broke the settlement agreement? That there is no Policy Paper making the policy legal. That they are all involved in criminal activity? That by supporting Martin and his supporters they are breaking their Oath of Office? That Martin has not fulfilled the demands of the Charter, the HR Code, and the MVA? That Martin changed the wording of the MVA to serve his purpose of Discrimination against the diabetic, therefore the disabled? That Martin did not have any legal or bona fide reason for the change of type?
Will these people be informed of this? And if not, why not?

My point is, if doctors are used for the Review are they going to be forced to do this, as they are forced to give the DME; “comply or loose your license” or be fined? Nazis tactics, as with my forced compliance or suffer the consequences. The doctors are forced to comply, as they know there is no reason for the policy and that the intervention cannot do what it is alleged to be able to do. Blackmail by gov't balanced off with demands of doctors? You do this and get this.
Do the doctors involved know all the above? Will they be given a copy of the Review I gave to ICBC? A copy of this letter? A copy of my Updated Consequences of the Policy? Have these doctors been told that by supporting the policy they are breaking their Code of Ethics of do no harm, or kill, or maim, or endanger life? That the intervention has not been proved to offer any Good?
On the other hand how do we know the doctors are not just dupes doing this for power, false prestige, and a stipend? There are doctors that will do anything for money, and there are doctors that have bias and prejudice against the diabetic, the disabled. And there are doctors that need Review boards for the prestige offered.
Reader, you don't think there are corrupt doctors that would gladly do this for money, prestige, and power? Corruption creates Corruption.
*

Who is to Review this “NOTICE OF PROHIBITION”?

My point is, who is going to Review my case of “Prohibition”? Martin? Some corrupt civil servants that are already involved in this illegal policy? Some corrupt civil servants that know nothing about thinking what her or his boss did, or not allowed to think about what his or her boss did to me and what he didn't respond to? Some corrupt civil servants that are afraid of their boss, Martin? Some corrupt civil servants that are ordered to do what Martin tells them to do?
Are those that are doing the Review going to be informed the policy is illegal?
Are those that will be Reviewing the Prohibition be given this letter?
Are those involved receiving a copy of the Review letter I gave to ICBC?
Are those involved receiving a copy of my Updated Consequences of the Policy?
Will those involved be given enough material concerning my complaints to understand the Hate driving Martin's illegal activity concerning this “Notice of Prohibition”?
If not why not? Why am I not allowed Equality and Inclusion, as all other Canadians are?

Reader, do you think those Reviewing Martin's personal “Notice of Prohibition” will contradict him? A Prohibition not based upon anything, but his private, secretive “information”? Based upon nothing legal? Based upon gossip? Do you think they will stand up to Martin and recommend charges against Martin for falsely labeling and processing me as a criminal?
Martin threatened me, the phoney demand for a new cycle of DME, and then implemented the threat, without reviewing that I had brought this forward through a third party. When I complained he consciously and deliberately, without any evidence, labeled me as a criminal, after my license was cancelled, and now I am to be Reviewed like a Nigger on Stick and Chain to see if I'm jumping high enough and do you think these “Reviewers” will acknowledge this?
Reader, what are the Reviewer's legal responsibilities concerning their Reviews? Won't they need all the information concerning this Prohibition? Will this lead to months of Review? Won't they need to be informed I have done nothing illegal and in doing so they will learn that they have nothing to review for comparison if I have bettered myself? Like changing some criminal behaviour, not drinking anymore, not smoking so much BC Bud, etc. What are they then going to do?
This is like the Draft I was sent for Review, implication of comparison to an old policy, where in fact there was nothing for comparison, just a lie that there was.
This is like the Policy, Martin has not proved there is a difference in driver mishaps between non - diabetic drivers and type 2s. No difference, therefore there is nothing for comparison to, even if Martin and Howie had studied the Policy for Good, which they haven't.
How do these Review people acknowledge change when there is nothing to begin with other than Hate and Violence?

My point is, how is the Review Committee going to Review me when there is no problem, or event, or criminal charge, or deviant behaviour to base a comparison to, in order to see change for Good? The comparison would come from me not driving for month, with me supposedly fulfilling some unknown demands upon me to prove I am not doing what I was not doing. How insane is that. And Martin doesn't have mental health problems?
Remember, all I did was say NO and explained why, something Martin has not done. He can't can he.

What Martin wants me to learn is that he is the Boss and I'm the Nigger and he can do what he wants to me. And those that are assaulted and raped are supposed to be quiet, to not want to expose the violence and shame associated with these deviant events for the world to see.
Let me very clear about this, Martin assaulted and raped me, and I'll stand up anywhere anytime. I am afraid of Martin, but not enough to not go to court and record his violence and perversions. The only thing Martin did not do to me physically is stick his penis in my rectum or my mouth. All other social, emotional, physical, and financial negatives associated with rape are experiences I am now dealing with and will take them with me for the rest of my life.
Again, I'm sixty one years old and a good citizen and now through this corrupt senior civil servant's perverted “view” of life I am now a Criminal and been raped by a gov't representative. And it was done in the Public Space not behind closed doors where no one saw it. There is witness.
Reader, what do you think Martin is doing with this illegal “Notice of Prohibition”? What laws did I break? Was I found guilty of breaking those laws? Why am I being Reviewed like a Nigger? Not even knowing who is doing it and what information they have for review? Saying NO is not breaking any Law in Canada. If I was to drive without a license the police will deal with this.
Martin has taken the law into his own hands. He has practiced Vigilanteism. He has taken the law into his own hands, pronounced a sentence, and implemented that sentence in the Public Space. All done with the intention to Hurt me.
Martin has again abused his position of status, trust, power, and prestige to say the least.

Reader, you don't think he will threaten or make promises to those Reviewing his illegal activity? You can't be that naïve.

My point is, RCMP and readers, do you think I'll be given my license back or a Temporary license if these Reviewers want to learn about the policy and its illegality or I am to not be able to drive while they investigate for months and years in order to protect themselves from any accountability? Do you think this is part of Martin's madness? You need to think about this.
*

What I Want Now as Martin has Assaulted and Raped Me

These accusations for charges against Martin are additional to the criminal activity associated with not fulfilling the demands of the Charter, the HR Code, and the MVA concerning the illegal policy. As well as the broken settlement agreement, stolen research, broken Affidavit, etc. As well as the breach of his Oath of Office.
The newly discovered falsifying of legal documents listed above will be addressed below.
But first:
I want his background checked, as Martin has just engaged in Hate, Vigilanteism and more criminal acts concerning this, with the consequences of me being Assaulted and Raped, and my license canceled again with a Review attached, I want his background checked, as I am afraid for my life.

My family, as stated above, I am now afraid for my life with what he has just done to me and this roles over to my family. At a minimum, as he is the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles, he has access to driver records, he can access my son, my daughters, and my wife's records, finding where they live, etc. He has begun his personal vendetta against me and the assault and rape, by default, incorporates my family. His computer at work is for work not looking up my family. He has no legal right to access their files just because he sees me as the uppity Nigger challenging him, his illegal policy, and all the horrific consequences.
He has already proved he has used his Position in Gov't and Gov't stationary for his own Personal wants with his attack upon me; therefore it is only reasonable he has used his computer for his wants.
He may use his personal computer, phone, or similar research tool, such as a 'blackberry', for this where he can throw it away before anyone can research his activities but his access to records through the gov't computers will have his use recorded, his footprint will be there, where he cannot delete it. It will be there.
I want to know if he accessed my children's records and my wife's records. I want a guarantee that the RCMP and gov't, the Solicitor General and the Attorney General, know he hasn't done this. Begun stalking my family, because that is what it is, if he has researched who they are. Stalking and more, breach of Oath of Office, breach of Code of Ethics concerning computer use, etc. (Hunt cannot be trusted in an investigation by the A G office concerning this, as she is involved with Martin.) I have a Right to know because of what he has done to me and has me worried about.

Secondly, Pornography, because I said NO to his demands, which he rejected, where he then assaulted and raped me, to teach me who's boss, which means his behaviour concerning morals/ethics have been corrupted to say the least. It also means he has corrupted the laws of our country again, which he has proved. This assault and rape is very Personal and Public. This means he may have practiced this before, somewhere, somehow, as this kind of deviant behaviour just doesn't express itself in the Public Space for all to see without practice. He has learned that his deviant behaviour, at arms length, is not questioned in Public, as no one has challenged him about the policy and its consequences. He is braver now and moved into Personal assault and rape, moving away from the Impersonal, Public Policy, done at arms length. This means there should be a history of his deviant behaviour beyond his deviant behaviour documented through the illegal policy and all the laws he has broken and add all the killing, maiming, and endangerment to life it does; these acts are done at arms length, its not Personal, as the assault and rape of me is, he has begun a Personal focus now. This is a new phase of his perversion, deviant behaviour, and criminal activity. He is stepping up. He has become Personally aggressive in his Hate and Harm.
Knowing this about Martin we must again search his computers and private places for Pornography; any kind of pornography on work computers is against the law. Child porn is against the law anywhere. So are killing movies. As he has raped and assaulted me we need to know where he has traveled on the web, while searching to fulfill his voyeurism and depravity, as it will be part of his deviant behaviour. Again, he can throw his computer away but his footprint on the gov't computers will be there where he cannot delete it.

Third, I want my license back immediately, as I have done nothing wrong and have fulfilled the demands of ICBC by fulfilling the DME.
Martin knows what this “Notice of Prohibition” is doing to me. I am defenseless to it and he knows this, he knows this will take at least a month and if I challenge him it will move into the public space of Humiliation. Public Humiliation and Humiliation is part of assault and rape, it is an instrument of Harm, the Threat of Humiliation to keep the victim quiet, used as Control.
So, his actions are also Threats and he implemented those threats.
Reader, I have a choice; being assaulted and raped and be quiet for a month and maybe get my license back with a “Notice of Prohibition” on it for the rest of my life or confront Martin and his corrupt supporters. It is fair to say that assaults and rape bring stigma with it and therefore are not declared as they should be; he knows this. Reader, if you do not understand this you really need to wake up.

Fourth, cancel the Review Process and give me my license back before it gets out of hand as Martin is, Martin also knows that if questions are asked about the false Notice of Prohibition, that information is demanded by the Review board about the policy, and a challenge by me about this it will take months and maybe stop the Review process, where I would not get my license back; don't forget he controls this illegal Charge and Review board. And if I was to continue with complaining about the type change, the Public Humiliation of Assault and Rape, this will continue for months or years. He knows these things, as that is why he did it. The name of his game is to Hurt. This Hurt needs to be stopped immediately.

Fifth, I want someone, the RCMP or Solicitor General to teach Martin that there is something called NO, that it is a very real statement with legal consequences. Martin, whether you like it or not I have the Right to question your behaviour, say NO, and not be assaulted and raped by you. I have the Right to say NO. You have severe mental health issues to do what you have done with supporting an illegal policy in the first place knowing its consequences, as no one is forcing you do so, this is a choice you have made. As just proved by your refusal of my NO, you are refusing to say NO to this illegal policy for unknown reasons, knowing it is illegal and kills.
Say NO to this illegal policy. Who are you to say NO to a public policy that has not been proved to be needed and has horrific consequences; socially, emotionally, financially, and physically. You are allowed to say NO. Who are you to say to Canada, that its People through laws, are not allowed to say NO to a world wide attack upon the diabetic, the disabled, the public, our health care system, our Charter, and our Human Rights for no good reason and you know this? Canada is allowed to say NO. That diabetics and the disabled and doctors do manage themselves or conditions without your phoney intervention. Canada is allowed to be a first to cancel their participation in an experiment gone wrong; just like those people in the social experiments listed above. You know this about this illegal policy and you haven't said NO.

Lastly, Fear, Martin, you have entered a new phase of mental health issues for doing what you have just done to me. Let there be no mistake I am indeed afraid of you and the world needs to know this. You really are scary. Martin, I will not bow down to you and kiss your ass, or give you a blow job, or bend over to you, you'll have killed me before that happens. So, what happens now that I've said NO again?
*


I Accuse and Want Charges Laid, it's your job RCMP

RCMP, you can add these official accusations to the accusations listed in my letter of March 4, 2011, as these illegal and criminal actions are newly discovered through my refusal to be Martin's Nigger on a Stick and Chain and run to the doctor and comply with his demand I fulfill the illegal DME again for no bona fide reason.
Once again it must be remembered he has lied about the DME Form having legal tender, contriving a document, to make it seem as if it has legal tender, in order to run his illegal policy. He also knows the phoney medical examination cannot do what it is alleged to be able to and that is predict, prevent, and manage hypoglycemia, the very reason for the DME. He also knows he has changed the wording of the MVA to lie about his power and Right to intervene into the public's life.
RCMP, you have not dealt with these facts, it was your legal duty to do so when I contacted you concerning the theft of research and breach of Copyright, theft of Intellectual Property, and breach of Intent of Use, done to justify the policy, which means the policy was left illegal and you buried it. The Human Rights Decision also informs the policy is illegal. All this is illegal and you know it. You broke the law yourselves, as you are not allowed to bury or turn your back on illegal activity.
Reader, it must be remembered it was only recently the RCMP allowed diabetics to become RCMP, from a Human Rights Complaint; they then used the constable for a TV recruitment drive; and they won't stand up for the other 3 000 000 diabetics in Canada? So, is your old Discrimination, bias, prejudice, hate, ignorance, fear and loathing, disgust, and contempt of the diabetic still ruling your behaviour? The old boys network afraid of change demanded by our Charter, the HR Code, and the MVA? You explain this to the world after I've been killed, due to your indifference.

Now look where we are. How many Sinclair's have happened in our Emerge facilities since then? You could have stopped it by confronting these monsters; they've admitted the DME has not, does not, do any Good. What kind of monsters are Martin, Howie, and Hunt for running this policy after stating that?
If Canada is the first Country in the World or BC the first Province in Canada to challenge these Nazis and anti - diabetics who is to say we are not allowed to do so? Who are you to say we need to continue on with this Discrimination, bias, prejudice, hate, ignorance, fear and loathing, disgust, and contempt of the diabetic? As the policy only harms and not legal we need to ask, “What is Canada doing?” and “For whom?”.

How many are to be killed by these people doing this? How many maimed? How many forced to buy health care, as I was forced to do? How many now addicted to drugs waiting for surgery and now a problem for the RCMP?
RCMP, it has just been proved that you have been set - up and doing Goon Work for these corrupt civil servants, such as Martin, Howie, and Hunt and unknown others. You should have stood up to them when I complained to you about this theft in May 2009 when you were asked to.
Hunt, Supervising lawyer for the Attorney General's office should have stood up and defended the Crown when she became involved in 2002 - 2004 or 2004 - 2006, when she discovered the policy was illegal, but she didn't do this, only having Lee paraphrase the MVA to mislead about the policy and its legitimacy, and then played charades to bury this after Martin and Howie broke the Settlement Agreement. How many lives would have been saved if she stood up then? These acts were a public recognition that she knew the policy was illegal, but how long had she known about the policy in Private meetings? Even the Overcrowding in Manitoba would have been changed if she had stood up for the Crown and Public then, as all gov't demands upon the health care system would have been exposed and forced to undergo the same vigorous examination, as the Public's demands are. Sinclair may have been alive today.
Reader, this is why I review again and again to remind you of the Players and their Actions to make Connections and Context, so you know the gov't has really known, for a long time, this policy is illegal and they absolutely know about the horrific consequences.

RCMP, if you had had the guts, the grit to do your job a few years ago this would not have happened to me, as Martin would not have been there to assault and rape me. Your cowardice reinforced his deviant behaviour to continue on with what ever he wants, as he learned that you would not confront him.
*

I Accuse

I accuse Martin of Falsifying Documents, the Driver's Medical Examination Form, to make it seem the DMR Form has legal tender. It lies about the policy as being legal, which it isn't. It lies about what it can do, and that he changed the wording of Section 29 to mislead to the users that the policy is legal.
This is a class or form of Counterfeiting, done to mislead about the validity and actions of the Crown. Everyone that uses this Form believes this is a valid Crown legal document and it isn't. It's in opposition to Crown documents, as those that contrived it know it's an illegal document in the guise of a legal Crown document. They have changed the meaning of the MVA to get their way. No different than counterfeit money, lying about legal tender. It's also breaches his Oath of Office as he has lied, mislead, misinformed, and misrepresented about the Form and its legitimate power.

I accuse Martin of Falsifying Documents, the letter of December 24, 2010, there is no classification number, is a false demand, as Martin knows the policy is illegal and the DME cannot do what it is alleged to be able to do. No different than counterfeit money, lying about legal tender. And yet he continues with his lies, discrimination, bias, prejudice, hate, ignorance, fear and loathing, disgust, and contempt of the diabetic. Using a form letter to keep arms length from his corrupt behaviour. This is counterfeiting.

I accuse Martin of Falsifying Documents, the letter classified as MV2602 (032008), coming from Thomson, Director, Provincial Licensing, February 03, 2011. He contrived this letter to have ICBC do his dirty work, or illegal activities, to use the naïve bystander for his illegal activities, in an effort to keep arms length from his illegal activities. He knows he has not fulfilled the demands of Section 29. He stole science in an effort to do this and I caught him and the science was withdrawn, therefore the policy remains illegal, so he knows this letter of power is counterfeit. Therefore, he knows he does not have the legal right to use Section 92 of the MVA. He has lied to ICBC about this also. This also breaks his Oath of Office.

I accuse Martin of Falsifying Documents, the letter dated March 17, 2011, there is no classification number, but there is a number beside the license number, C-419318. Or at the bottom of the page, there is “016”. This illegal document is from Martin, sent after my letter to ICBC and someone's contact with him. No different than counterfeit money, lying about legal tender.

First sentence of the letter, this letter is a lie, as Martin has not found me, had any proof that I had been “previously found that you are unfit to drive”. This is a lie because the DME cannot and has not been proved to be able to do what he alleges it to be able to do; that is find diabetic drivers unfit. His office has not responded to my question whether the DME can do what it is alleged to be able to do, and they have written that they have not studied the policy to see if it is doing any Good. Martin is lying about this and he knows this.
Secondly, by not fulfilling or completing the DME Martin has no evidence that I am unfit to drive and he knows this. I have not completed the DME and that is that. With No DME there is No license, not that I am “unfit to drive”. He is again lying to construct a false image or understanding of what is really happening.

Second paragraph, first sentence, “I have information indicating that you have driven during this cancellation.” So, what. It is a 'may have' not a 'have done'. It is up to the police and courts to intervene if a person 'has' driven without license. It must be remembered that Martin runs this policy on 'there may be a difference in driver mishaps', not on the Truth or on the fulfilled demands of our Democracy to make the policy legal. He is again making up, contriving acts to justify his illegal, criminal behaviour and again using these against the diabetic, the Nigger, that has done nothing. Again, falsifying documents to support his acts, based upon his lies and innuendo, in order to intervene outside the police and courts and the laws of Canada. This is what he has done here; lied to mislead that he can be the police and courts and pronounce sentence on the diabetic in one sweep of his hand, or one letter. Done to Harm the diabetic that may have driven, that enlightened ICBC to his illegal acts and consequences, that may have snubbed his Nigger nose at Martin.
Second paragraph, second sentence, again, Martin knows Section 92 is not applicable, as he has not fulfilled the demands of Section 29.
Second paragraph, third sentence, again this is a lie. I have not been found unsafe or that I will harm others. I have only not filled the DME and Form and I do not need to explain the “why” to him.
Second paragraph, fourth sentence, Martin has assaulted and raped me with this action, the Notice of Prohibition. He has contrived a false image of what has happened, what I am, what the law is, what he is allowed by law to do, and what this Notice of Prohibition really is. Done to mislead, to misinform, to misrepresent about my refusal to comply, done to falsify facts, in order to some how justify his harm upon me. To intervene where the police and courts should be the intervenors, as he has evaluated me, not charged me, and found me guilty of something in order to penalize me. He knows that I cannot just complete the DME and be given a new license, as this sentence states, because he has used his perverted authority to over ride that request of ICBC. He again lies about his actions and documents he uses. He knows of the consequences of this Notice of Prohibition and has falsely written that it is something that it is not, that it can do what it is alleged to be able to do; it cannot give me my license back after I complete the DME, as I am to be Reviewed like a Nigger, that it will take at least a month according the ICBC staff, that there is nothing to review for the Reviewers, that I will have a Record, and he knows all this about this Notice of Prohibition.
Martin knows I have confronted his lies and corruption in my letter to ICBC, discrimination complaints, letters to gov't, the RCMP, and others and yet he continues to send his illegal lying letters of abuse.
Again Martin lies about Section 92 in this letter as he has not fulfilled Section 29. He has not fulfilled Section 25 either, and he knows I will not get my license back for at least a month, until reviewed by his cronies, and what are they going to do when there is no mention of why I'm listed as “evidence that you are unfit to drive.”? Or are they to be told to stonewall on my license renewal and not cancel the Notice of Prohibition and its record, as he has done, by not accepting the demands of our Charter, the HR Code, the MVA, and his Oath of Office and cancel the policy? All done through the falsifying of documents.

I accuse Martin of Falsifying Documents. The fourth and last illegal document that I have discovered that has been used against me in the attack, assault, and rape of me by Martin. More of Martin's illegal criminal behaviour of falsifying documents to not only manipulate and mislead the diabetic driver, but ICBC, the public, the RCMP, and every other police force in BC.
The last document used in this lie to manipulate and abuse the diabetic driver and others is the NOTICE OF PROHIBITION FROM DRIVING A MOTOR VEHICLE, MV (112005) given to me by a RCMP constable, done in order to inform me of Section 92 of the MVA, and as a receipt that I gave him my license. It is also a lie given out and used by Martin to deceive about his power, his legal power and authority.

On the front of the Notice it states, “The person serving this notice has been authorized to do so by the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles.”
This means this Notice has legal tender to do what it is presented as, based upon its face value, a legal document with power to do things. That it has the Right to do things. However, it is just another lie that Martin has legally justified the use of it for the person using it, meaning the RCMP and every other police force in BC. Martin knows he has not fulfilled the demands of the Charter, the HR Code, and the sections of the MVA in order to give the notice legal tender.
This sentence is a lie. The police may be using it in good faith, but that is not good enough, as the police are supposed to know the law, to know what is being demanded of the public, to know the power of documents they use to intervene in the public's life. Police forces using this Notice, as legal tender have been mislead by Martin, and there is purpose in his actions. Purpose of deceit and Harm.
RCMP if you had investigated Martin about his theft of scientific documents and therefore the illegal policy, when I complained a few years ago, the RCMP would not have been giving out Counterfeit Notices for years. What are you going to do, as you have been duped, purposely manipulated by Martin to give him power over not only the driver but you, the RCMP and every other police force? How many licenses have been cancelled and should not have been? This sentence makes the Notice invalid, as it is contrived to mislead, misinform, and misrepresent, as to the legal power of the Notice and the power of the Superintendent, Martin. He knowingly falsified this document and has used it with purpose to mislead and abuse all concerned with it.

On the back of the Notice, it is stated;
“Prohibition against driving relating to fitness or ability to drive.
92 If
(a) a person has been required under section 29 to submit to an examination and he or she ...”.

This is another lie about section 29, as section 29's demands have not been fulfilled and Martin knows this. Again, Section 29 has not been fulfilled. And only after it is fulfilled and the need proven bona fide does Section 29 become “required”, changing from “may require”.
I am only “required” as Martin presents that he has fulfilled Section 29. This is just another lie like I am a liability to myself and others. Under the law he has not fulfilled the demands to make me “required”. Driver's are manipulated to comply and do so believing the demand is legal, therefore a “required” is acceptable language. But it is not, “required” is used as an unlawful demand, a power demand, used to manipulate the driver and all others using this Notice. The DME is complied to by drivers through the threat of loosing one's license, believing the policy is legal, as doctors believe it is legal, and as the RCMP believe it is legal tender and that is why it is used, why it was given to me, not as a citation or ticket, but as an information instrument from the constable and as a receipt for giving him my license.
RCMP you have more than egg on your face with this.

I accuse Martin of Harassment, as the DME is not needed and I am or was labeled as a type 2 with a five (5) year medical examination cycle and for some unknown reason have had my Classification changed. The doctor that did the last DME nor I changed anything for Martin to reclassify at his whim. I am not his Nigger to be reclassified, relabeled for him to order me around. Martin had the option to contact me or his staff about the demand for the new DME cycle after someone contacted him about my proof that his policy is illegal, the demand for a medical exam illegal, the falsifying of the DME Form that it is a legal document, and the fact that he changed the wording of the MVA to misinform, mislead, and misrepresent, as to his power to make demands upon the public, and to dupe others into doing his dirty work or goon work for him, so that he is at arms length from his illegal activity.
To not investigate my complaint of change of type and then intervene knowing the severe consequences of his actions, is Harassment to say the least. He came after me knowing what he was doing; knowing there were alternative actions to take and he didn't. Knowing I had acted in an act that had cancelled my license. He knew ICBC had cancelled my license and yet he still came after me. Knowing I had the Right to cancel my license. Knowing I could renew my license if I complied with ICBC's demand and fulfill the DME. And yet he still came after me.

I accuse Martin of Discrimination, not only that he knows the policy is illegal but I am or was labeled as a type 2 with a five (5) year medical examination cycle. Martin had the option to contact me about the demand for the illegal DME after someone contacted him about my proof the policy is illegal, the demand for a medical exam illegal, the falsifying of the DME Form that it is a legal document, the lie that it can do what it is alleged to be able to do, and the fact that he changed the wording of the MVA to misinform, mislead, and misrepresent, as to his power to make demands upon the public. The change in type is Discriminatory as I was not involved in the re - Classification. Classification of Humans needs all involved to be involved, as I am NOT his Nigger or dog.
Secondly, Martin chose not to give me a Temporary license or cancel the demand I comply with a new DME after knowing my complaint to ICBC and their canceling of my license. He chose to continue with his Discrimination toward me for no good reason other than his bias, prejudice, hate, ignorance, fear and loathing, disgust, and contempt of the diabetic. He chose not to give me what my neighbour had been given. She had not done anything wrong neither have I.
Third, Martin altered or over road ICBC's cancellation of my license, to something detrimental and criminal. He did this without contacting me with a bona fide reason for the change, he did this on rumor, gossip, and from unknown sources, maybe Martians. To do this knowing the consequences of his actions, how harmful they are, exemplifies Discrimination as I am not acknowledged as having any Rights concerning this draconian change of Martins. The act is arbitrary and one sided, which is Discrimination.
Fourth, to not investigate my complaint of change of type and then intervene knowing the severe consequences of his actions, is Discrimination to say the least. He came after me knowing what he was doing. Knowing I had acted in an act that had cancelled my license. He knew ICBC had cancelled my license and yet he still came after me. Knowing I had the Right to cancel my license. Knowing I could renew my license if I complied with ICBC's demand and fulfill the DME. He chose to act on gossip and rumor and not acknowledge I am Human and have the Right to say NO. It's Discriminatory to not listen to my NO, as it's real and needs to be acknowledged, legally acknowledged. And he refused to do this.

I accuse Martin of Counterfeiting, for counterfeiting the Forms used against me and thousands of others. Used to mislead that they are bona fide legal Crown documents. Used to mislead those acting for the Crown; the RCMP, Police, and every lawyer that was/is involved in legal matters concerning these Forms. Martin has used these forms to benefit in ways that he could not have if he fulfilled the demands of the forms, which would then make them legal tender; coming from the Charter, the HR Code, and the MVA.

I again accuse Martin of Hate. How else can we explain what he has done to me, as he does not have the Right to run the policy to begin with and yet he does. Hate, as he knows his documents are lies and the consequences of the Notice of Prohibition are not what he states they are. Hate, as he had taken the law into his own hands and made me a Criminal without charges, without the legal right to have defense, without the Right for defense for a month at least or more, without a court case, without a judge, and passed sentence restricting me from driving and maybe access to the USA and other countries, as I'm seen as a Criminal. He has labeled me as a liability to not only myself but others; no proof. Hate as he knows this designation of Notice of Prohibition will Hurt me, emotionally, socially, financially, and physically. Hate as he knows I am here but he cannot acknowledge my presence, I do not exist as someone on par or equivalent with himself, I'm the Nigger, and his Hate constructs this non - Human.
Martin's actions are a “Hate Crime”, as he used his position in gov't to attack a person personally, not for the Good of Society, but to Harm me, with purpose of Malice, to control, to show who's Boss and who's the Nigger on a Chain and Stick. He used his counterfeit Form, contrived an unknown reason as justification for the Form's use, used it knowing the harm to me socially, emotionally, financially, and physically, he used his position to over ride an already cancelled license, which legally he had no reason to do. He did this because of Hate, as I have challenged him, his illegal policy, its horrific consequences, and exposed his personal intrusion into my life with the change of diabetic type forcing me to endure his illegal, humiliating, phoney driver's medical examination and new Classification, as if I have no say in this. There are other options as to treat me but his Hate will not allow him to do so.
Lastly, it must always be remembered that Martin cannot accept that I visit the doctor twenty (20) times to the one ( 1 ) time he forces me to undergo his illegal phoney DME that cannot do anything, Hate, hate is what stops him from acknowledging the health care my doctor and myself practice. His Hate cannot allow him to accept this fact of Private and Public health care by the diabetic, therefore social responsibility by diabetics.

I accuse Martin of Rape. Martin has raped me as in the first place he has stripped me of my Rights under the Charter, the HR Code, and the MVA. He has raped me of Equality and Inclusion into our Country. His actions have constructed me as the Pariah, the Other, and the Nigger on a Stick and Chain dancing for him, for his illegal demands of me if I want to drive.
When I said NO, he would not allow me to do so, to leave this Constructed place of Nigger he has for me. Even with my license cancelled, a conscious act on my behalf, he would not leave me alone. He attacked me with his illegal change of Classification, his hate, his falsified documents in order to hurt me and control me; what rapists do.
He set upon me and again stripped me of my Rights under the Charter, the HR Code, and the MVA; all the above counterfeit documents deny me my Rights once again. Once was not enough with Martin, he took this into the Public Place and assaulted me with his illegal documents to hurt and humiliate, to label me as a Criminal, to strip me, to rape me of my dignity, value, and worth; done to control me. To harm me personally as rapists do to their victims, to control, to manipulate, and harm. Stripping the victim of dignity, value, and worth is the game played by the rapist to discourage the victim from realizing they have Rights, have dignity, value, and worth, which will be forfeited further, if they do challenge and expose the rapist. Further harm comes from the fact that unknowns will be evaluating me for crimes I did not do, not knowing I did anything, therefore cannot challenge; therefore the rapist's sick presentation or twisted proposition that I was asking for it and should have known what I was doing; that as a diabetic I need control because according to Martin “for your own safety and that of others” he will control me at any cost. Disclosure is also another threat used by rapists for control, the fact that if I expose Martin about this new Classification, assault, and rape the Review may continue on for years. And the disclosure of assault and rape is horrific to say the least.
Reader, Fear for my life over rides all this. This is all part of rape and control. Martin and his supporters are monsters. They are the monsters of the Human species.

I accuse Martin of Assault. What Martin did to me is assault. There was/is no need for him to do what he did. It cannot be justified.

I accuse Martin of Perjury, he swore an Oath of Office to obey the Law, do not Harm, Lie, Steal, Kill, Mislead, Misinform, and Misrepresent. He does not have the Right to make up policy, to contrive phoney laws to mislead everyone about his wants. He has not defended the Crown against criminal behaviour, but personalized his attack upon the Crown, by falsifying documents that give him carte blanch power over the public, which according to Crown documents, the MVA, the Charter he does not have. He needs to earn the Right to make demands upon the Public; to prove a need and acknowledge the consequences are acceptable and do less harm than the need. He has done nothing of the sort.

I accuse Martin of, Denigrating, Defaming, Harming my Character, my Worth, and Value as a person. Of knowingly Harming my Dignity and Self - Respect. He states, “For your own safety and that of others, you must stop driving immediately.” This is a Public document which is illegal and used for illegal purposes. The letter of March 17, 2011, C-419318.
He has no proof that I am a liability to myself. He's a liar. He knows this.
He has no proof that I am a liability to others. He's a liar. He knows this.
These are lies. These are contrived lies to Harm me. To Harm me in the readers eyes, the Public Space. These are lies that are used to continue and support the degradation of my character, of the diabetic. These are lies to continue with his personal contempt of diabetics, as he has not justified the policy knowing there is no science to do so and knowing the horrific consequences and now he attacks me personally with no proof to justify his statements.
These are lies to continue the contrived anti - diabetic policy, to construct the diabetic as the Pariah, the Other, the Nigger, so he can do what he wants, knowing there is no Need for his policy little lone the phoney DME. This is done to take my Value and Worth away so you, the reader, the Public believe it's ok for him to intervene and save you from the diabetic that is a liability to himself and you. I have Value and Worth whether you like it or not.

I accuse Martin of Libel. For the immediately above reasons. It's libel as he knows his statements are harmful and based upon lies. He has deliberately stated the above knowing readers will understand that I'm a liability to myself. That I am a liability to society. And yet, he has not proved any of these things. He knows this.

I accuse Martin of Vigilanteism. He has taken the law into his own hands, without a reason he has pronounced me a liability to myself and the public, pronounced a sentence, and implemented that sentence in the Public Space. This is also Treason. This is a breach of his Oath of Office.

I accuse Martin of Threatening me. He knows the phoney change of type is threat to me, changing how I will be Classified, therefore treated by his illegal policy. He knows if I do not comply I will loose my license. He knows if I complain he will do what he has done to me. He knows what this “Notice of Prohibition” is doing to me. I am defenseless to it and he knows this, he knows it will be taken away from ICBC and sent to Review, where he has control, introducing another threat of compliance. He knows this will take at least a month and if I challenge him it will move again into the public space of Humiliation. Public Humiliation and Humiliation is part of assault and rape, it is an instrument of Harm, the Threat of Humiliation and Shame; used to control. So, his actions are also conscious, contrived Threats used to Harm and Control.

I accuse Martin of Breach of Trust. The public has freely given Martin status, trust, power, and prestige with the Title of Superintendent of Motor Vehicles. He has broken this with what is listed above.

I accuse Martin of Blackmail, as he has consciously chosen to Harm me with the Notice of Prohibition, knowing I have not done anything to warrant such a Prohibition, as my license was already cancelled. He has escalated that cancellation, taken the completed DME away from me. Taken my license away from me and locked it up until some unknowns say it ok to release, but that release is dependent upon payment of money. He did this knowing that I would need to pay financially to cancel the Notice of Prohibition, knowing that if I did not pay the demand I would continue to be labeled a Criminal and be Reviewed until I paid the ransom. It doesn't matter if the ransom is $250 or a million, Martin knows there is financial penalty to pay if I want something he has taken away, and this is in addition to someone else having cancelled my license, where there is no demand for money. He intervened to make sure this payment came about. He has played the blackmail game and has been caught.
This is not the same scenario as what would happen if I had a Notice of Prohibition if I had driven and been caught, or had to many accidents, or to many drunk charges, or to many charges of being stoned on drugs while driving, etc and a payment needed to pay for the time and paperwork needed to cancel the Notice of Prohibition, after the person had fulfilled a change in behaviour pattern and allowed to drive again. This is a contrived scenario, so that the blackmail would unfold to me, so that I would know Martin also controlled me financially.

I accuse Martin of Breaking his Oath of Office as explained with the above. He also used his Public Position, as a representative of Government, to do his Personal Wants, his Private wants. This is against the law. Done to attack, assault, and rape a Private person that has challenged him concerning his gov't behaviour. He did this under the cloak or guise of a bona fide Government Need, wearing his Government hat while doing his Personal wants, but really wearing his Personal hat. He did this feigning legality and doing so at arms length, again feigning legality, which both feign false attendance to established protocol of gov't employees, therefore putting forward actions that seem legal. But really as counterfeit as his forms are.
This is just another charade played by Martin, showing something with the left hand, while the right is doing something different and illegal. He's broken his Oath of Office and more by using his gov't position and gov't stationary to do his private wants, to do his criminality.
*

What I Want

What I want. I want all those involved in this to suffer Capital Punishment. They have taken lives and should be forced to give up their lives, as they have knowingly continued on with their illegal behavior knowing they are killing and maiming.

However, in Canada, we do not have Capital Punishment any more and that is a Good thing. We do not have Capital Punishment, as the threat has been proved not to deter the act of killing.
Secondly, we do not have the Right to kill people; practiced in defense that we may be killing one that is not guilty. We do not have the Right to kill the one, no matter how difficult that seems to accept.
So, why are they, representatives of the Crown, senior civil servants allowed to kill with any policy little lone an illegal gov't policy? They have killed more than the one and they are guilty of nothing? They are not naïve bystanders to their behaviour and illegal policy.
Why are they allowed to execute the naïve bystander?
It is an Execution, as these people know what they are doing and the consequences upon Emerge and are still sending people to their deaths in Emerge. The Gov't runs the Emerge for the benefit of society, but on the other hand knows what they are doing with their illegal policy (policies) and its (their) influence on the Overcrowding. They have had the opportunity to cancel the policy and have not, they have not stayed the death penalty that their actions have contrived, due to their illegal policy supported by its false supposedly legal documents, etc, etc.
What is really sick and twisted concerning this is that the gov't then blames the Public for Overcrowded Emerge and doctors for the deaths, while hiding their influence by being at arms length with the illegal policy. This is like blaming the prison and guards for Executions that used to happen in Canada. In reality it was government and society of those times, but now, its just government doing the killing, and the Public and doctors used as the scapegoat. The Executions or killing due to Overcrowding needs to stop, as there are enough deaths in Emerge, as that is the nature of Emergency Facilities and the government's unacknowledged contribution is not acceptable.

I want the policy cancelled immediately, as it really is illegal and offers nothing for Canada, except Harm.

I want my license back. Back with no record of Notice of Prohibition. No $250 fine for Reinstatement of license or cancellation of the Notice of Prohibition or blackmail to Martin.

I want my Classification of type 2 reinstated, with the five year cycle, until this policy is cancelled. Just do it, as it should not have happened in the first instance.

I want Martin fired immediately before he hurts himself and others; like killing me.

I want Martin examined for psychopathic and sociopathic tendencies expressed, as how can he be doing what he has and is doing and knowing the consequences, if he doesn't have severe mental health issues?

I want Martin's supporters, those immediately known to me, as they have first hand involvement in this, Howie, Hunt, Dobbs, and the HRT staff who buried this Discrimination Complaint for Martin and gov't, be examined for psychopathic and sociopathic tendencies expressed, as how can they be doing what they are doing and knowing the consequences , if they also don't have severe mental health issues?

I also want the past Solicitor General's examined for psychopathic and sociopathic tendencies expressed, as how can they have buried this, knowing what Martin and his supporters have done and knowing the consequences, if they don't have severe mental health issues? Coleman was just transferred, de Jong buried this knowing he was to be transferred, Heed responded to me before he left for the second time but his staff lied to him concerning the legality of the policy, and we go back to Coleman when he was S G in 2004 and maybe a couple before that. The S G office is absolutely corrupt.

I want those ICBC staff that I had contact concerning my license renewal protected from any retribution from these monsters for looking into my file and doing their job. Which helped expose and explain Martin's assault and rape of me.

I want Martin, his supporters in the OSMV, and the Solicitor Generals Office charged with breach of Oath of Office. I want those politicians investigated, as to why they did not cancel the policy after being informed there was no Policy Paper making the policy legal. They buried it.

I want Bonnie Dobbs fired and investigated for stealing science, putting these documents into an Affidavit, misleading all readers that she had legal tender for use, therefore supposedly legalizing the illegal policy. I imagine she learned this from Martin and his supporters who have counterfeited the supposedly legal documents listed above.
If she is still employed by the OSMV supplying science, in an effort to legally justify the other medical conditions the OSMV supposedly manages, I want her investigated to make sure she has all the necessary forms concerning Copyright, Intellectual Property Rights, and Intent of Use present in her attempt to legally justify these illegal demands upon the disabled. Her falsifying the use of an Affidavit is Perjury. She swore an Oath that All was bona fide for use and it wasn't. She broke the Trust. She broke her Oath of Office. She sent these false documents through the mail, this is inter - provincial mail fraud. What else is RCMP lawyers?

I want Hunt, Supervising lawyer for the Attorney General's office, fired immediately, as she knows this policy is illegal, has been involved in its illegality for years, and played a charade to cover up the breach settlement agreement, a Crown settlement agreement, which she should have been defending not breaking and covering up. Again, running a gov't policy which is illegal, against the demands of the Crown, in opposition to the Crowns demands, the Charter and MVA, is Treason and Prohibited Acts. That Martin and Howie broke the Crown Settlement Agreement and it was not renewed. That she managed the stolen research presentation. That she managed the presentation of the research in an Affidavit where the Oath of Affidavit was broken. That she is responsible for the illegal documents being presented as legal tender and we all now know they are not, they are counterfeits, pretending to be real, bona fide Crown documents.
Her behaviour has jeopardized All court cases she has been involved in, as she has done this what has she done in other cases. She needs to be fired now so that ongoing cases are not jeopardized because of her past behaviour.

I want the HRT Decision, BCHRT 51, 04 February 2009, my third complaint, investigated as to why they buried the complaint as they did, knowing the policy is illegal and harms. Knowing stolen documents were used in an effort to justify the illegal policy. Why did the HRT bury the corrupted Affidavit? Why they changed the Scope of the complaint without my involvement and consent? Was this all allowed because it was all presented by a lawyer that was a past employee? Who blackmailed them to do this? As I was/am being blackmailed. Or did someone buy them off? Or were they threatened as I was?
*

Damages

I want damages. This is more than the HRT Discrimination Complaint where I wanted change. I was not after money. I wanted real change. Again, it has not happened. And in that complaint the OSMV offered damages to dignity, value, merit, and self - respect for me to go away. I was informed the damages were just part of the settlement agreement process. Standard stuff. I was given $3000.
This is different. It has again involved breaches of the Charter, HR Code, and the MVA. But I have been attacked, assaulted, raped, and turned into a criminal by these people and that takes it to where it should not have gone. I fear for my life now. What has just happened to me and is still ongoing is beyond any acceptable behaviour. And this is from Government in Canada.


I want compensation for the assault and rape and what has been done to me over the past years, since my initial inquiry of 2002, as the OSMV, therefore the Solicitor General's Office and other government ministries and civil servants knew the policy was illegal and they knew of the horrific consequences and have continued on, doing as they please.
The OSMV paid me $3000 in 2006 to go away with promises of change. I am approachable, accommodating, and compromising and that is what the BCHRT is all about, change. With Time we now know how Martin and his supporters have manipulate this with total disregard for the Laws of Canada and the absolute disregard for Human Life and the disregard for the underpinnings of the Goal, the Aim, or Mandate of the Human Rights Tribunal and its Discrimination Complaints.
With Time we can see how Martin and his supporter's deviant behaviour has increased to stealing, more lying, more falsifying of documents, breach of the sacred Trust of the Affidavit, and now harassment, bullying, increased threats, assault and rape and our new knowledge of the falsified documents Martin uses to implement and manage his illegal policy.
Change is what I was after then and still after change today. Change to acknowledge my Rights under the Charter, the HR Code, and the MVA, which they haven't done, as it is impossible to do and keep their policy. Impossible to do as this would acknowledge I am Human and not the Pariah, the Other, the Nigger with Rights.
Chancel the policy as it is illegal and has not been proved to offer Good, so why do it? Why do it knowing it is illegal? Why continue doing it knowing the cost to taxes, the cost to the health care system, and the cost to Human Life? Nothing has come from that out of court settlement agreement and that was five years ago. And all those involved don't have mental health issues?
The harm to my dignity and self respect, the humiliation, the breach of my Charter Rights, the HR code, and the MVA are not acceptable. Now I worry that Martin will kill me.
Martin has now assaulted and raped me for exposing him to ICBC and others, for challenging him and his illegal policy, for saying NO. Now I worry about the next step after illegalities, corruption, lies, theft, bullying, harassment, threats, and personal threats; the next step is stalking the game and killing it. I'm the game, as I'm not Human to Martin.
What is he going to do now with this letter, which exposes his violence and challenges his mental health? What is he going to do now that I challenge him again? What is he going to do now that I have said NO to him again?
*

I need to live with this very real threat? Why? Because gov't and police would not step up to him? Because Hunt promised to protect him? She has protected him all along, so now he has carte blanch to do what he wants?
These people, Martin and his supporters, care nothing for Life, the Laws of Canada, or Human Rights and they have learned Canada is afraid of them. As senior civil servants they now work for Power and Money, that's all, as they have proved they care for nothing else.
Firing will strip them of their misused, corrupted, perverted sense of Power.
The damages will address their lust for Money.
These two acts will confront them in that it will be society, Canadians, that finally stand up to them and acknowledge me as Human, something they are in denial of. And that society does not support their Criminal acts and their perverted “view” of life.

Money is used to pay for these social indignities, the harm of the constructed public humiliation, raping me of my value, worth, and merit.
Money is used to balance off the harm done by the attack and abuse to my self - respect and dignity.
Money is used to balance off the harm caused by the threats, harassment, bullying, falsifying documents to register me as a Criminal, and the assault, and rape used to dehumanize me in the public's eye.
Money used to balance off the harm caused by the indignities of retributions, malice, hate, and the vindictiveness of the assault upon me.
Money used to balance off the harm caused by the theft, lying, the falsifying of documents, breach of the sacred Trust of the Oath of Affidavit, the Trust given and all abused to label and classify me and be used against me.
Money used to balance off the harm done as I have been labeled as someone in danger of harming themselves and others. This is has not been proved, as the consequences of the policy have been.
Money used to balance off the harm done from lies that have been laid in order to label and classify me as a Pariah, the Other, the Nigger, therefore excusing Martin and his supporters from not allowing me to have Charter Rights, Human Rights, and the Rights of the Motor Vehicle Act.
Money used to balance off the harm done by the use of vigilanteism used to label me as a criminal, an outlaw.
Money used to balance off the harm done from the shame and humiliation experienced, as being labeled a criminal by the Notice of Prohibition.
Money used to balance off the harm caused by the act of blackmail.

A huge sum of money needs to be paid as Canada's Laws have not protected me, the HRT has not protected me, the police have not protected me, which leaves money as the instrument of change, lots of it, so the world knows how wrong all this is.
Due to my first Human Rights Discrimination complaint, mentioned above, the fee payment scheme was changed. The OSMV nows pays approximately $1 000 000 a year for phoney diabetic medical exams based upon an illegal policy and cannot do what they are alleged to be able to do, and that is predict, prevent, and manage hypoglycemia, low blood sugar, the very thing the policy is supposed to manage. This proves society and gov't care nothing for the public's money as the policy is illegal and the money does nothing, it's just spent.
Knowing this we can base the damages upon the following. On the numbers of diabetic drivers the OSMV says it manages. We have the change happening in August 2006, that's about $500 000 for the half year.
2007; $1 000 000
2008; $1 000 000
2009; $1 000 000
2010; $1 000 000
2011; $500 000
Total is $5 000 000

As these corrupt senior civil servants and politicians spend $5 000 000 on an illegal policy that cannot do what it is alleged to be able to do, then there is the equivalent tax dollars for me, as damage, to what they have done to me, I want the same in damages. I want Equality. As no one in Canada cares what Martin and his supporters spend and do, they do not have the Right to contest this. They have had their opportunity to be involved, be accountable, take responsibility, and have not done so. I have the Right for Equality. It's not very much money for what the gov't has done to me since 1999, the year of my diagnosis of type 2. It's only about $450 000 a year, divided by at least ten Acts of Harm, listed above, which is only $45 000 or less per Harm. It's just the number of harms needed to be contrived and played out for these people to run and hide their illegal policy and consequences that seems to make $5 000 000 a large compensation for damages. It's not.

Again, they care nothing for Life, the Laws of Canada, or the public's taxes, so they have no Right to not pay me for damages. They care for nothing anyway. This payment would be an excellent instrument to inform Martin and his gangster supporters that I am Human, that I do have Charter Rights, Human Rights, and Motor Vehicle Rights, as well as the Right to absolutely know that Martin is fulfilling his Oath of Office, without watching, which he and his supporters have not done. As Martin and his gangster friends will have been fired already, that firing and jail time and this compensation would be warning to the new generation of senior civil servants to obey the law before sticking their perverted “view” of life into Public lives.
Just maybe this fine or compensation for damage will make changes to the corruption in our society, the corruption of the civil service by a few, which tarnishes the reputation of all civil servants, which is wrong. How pleased will they be when Martin and his cronies are fired. How pleased will Emerge doctors be. How pleased will I be.

I also want $ 100 000 000, as that is what is spent on other medical conditions supposedly monitored by Martin for the Good of society. This sum will force the public to question gov't and what it is doing. This sum is explained below.

I also want to be reimbursed the $10 000 that I spent for my private spinal surgery, as the above taxes should have been used for bona fide, medical necessary demands upon the health care system, not illegal policy offering no Good.
*

Benefits of Firing, Fines, and the Cancellation of the Illegal Policy

Reader, don't forget to add the taxes used to pay for the other one hundred (100) medical conditions these corrupt civil servants say they monitor for the Good of society. Let's not forget about that money, as it is probably ill spent also, as what Martin has done to diabetics, who are now 10% of society, he probably has not done anything to justify his policy against those disabled people and again not acknowledged they also visit a doctor for their condition and medications.
How many of these people, like me, already visit their doctor for their condition and medications, as medications are not given out over the counter. Once again, I visit the doctor twenty (20) times compared to the one ( 1 ) time Martin forces upon me. Martin cannot acknowledge this as it will prove I take care of myself, (personal health care), therefore the public's care, (public health care), and a doctor is involved, which means doctors take care of their clients personal, increasing public health care and really don't need someone like Martin trying to tell them what to do; that their doctoring with me is not bona fide and Martin's is. You now know Martin's medical exam is useless. Just another left hand right hand lie.
So, how many disabled are there for each medical condition? At 1% of population per condition that's only 43 000 people whom drive with heart problems; seems low doesn't it, especially when we know people with heart problems are under doctor care, something Martin cannot acknowledge. Especially questionable since we know Martin and his supporters are liars, thieves, counterfeiters, bullies, criminals, traitors, etc, etc and all done for Power and Money, not that there is a bona fide need with legal consequences to their intervention. 43 000 heart conditions x $75 = $3 225 000 per year.
Lets drop this by a third, not an increase, just to be practical, as who would do this policy knowing the consequences and knowing the drivers are under doctor care to begin with, done for only a few people. To do this these people must be really problematic. These few people must be crashing all over the place.
Heart conditions as I believe heart problems are still the greatest killer. So, at only 0.30% of society we have 14 333 people with heart problems or about $1 000 000 a year in fees. Most of use drive. The scope or scale is huge so don't worry if there is a thousand different as there is something bigger to acknowledge which Martin and his supporters do not acknowledge.
If we average these conditions at a million dollars a condition, then we have a cost to the tax payer of $100 000 000. Martin is running his policy at $100 000 000 knowing the consequences and knowing disabled people, like diabetic drivers, like me, are being cared for by doctors. This is bigger non - acknowledgment than any argument about the above % being off by 0.05% or by 0.5%. And Martin and his supporters don't have mental health issues?
I get compensated for $5 000 000 and save this for the taxpayers for ever, as the policy should also be canceled, as the policy and its DME doesn't do anything. And I will continue to visit the doctor as that is who I am, as most people are. And I, as other diabetics, will not stop visiting doctors because this phoney DME has been cancelled. Why? Because they, as I am, are bigger than Martin and his corrupt supporters and take care of ourselves and myself.
I get the $100 000 000 and save this for the taxpayers for ever, as they are also visiting doctors and Martin knows this. And they will not stop visiting the doctor because this phoney DME has been cancelled. Why? Because they, as I am, are bigger than Martin and his corrupt supporters. Cancel the policy as it does nothing Good.

Reader, how do we know the other disabilities have not been legally justified in order for Martin to make his demands upon society, that there are no policy papers for the other conditions? You go to the last HRT Discrimination Complaint of mine, listed in Decisions, as BCHRT 51, 04 February 2009 and read that I am not allowed to lodge another complaint until the gov't produces a Policy Paper concerning all medical conditions it supposedly monitors for the Good of Society. In other words there never has been policy papers legally justifying these phoney demands and their horrific consequences. Nothing, just as with Diabetes. Just based upon Martins perverted “view” of life. He also knows these disabled drivers also visit doctors for care and medications as I do. How is Martin and his supporters to legally use science to justify the diabetic policy when the owners of the research now know Martin has stolen their research in an effort to legally justify the policy and now know of the consequences? How does Martin justify the killing and maiming to the owners of the research? And he is going to find research to justify these other medical conditions after he informs the owners what he wants them for, knowing people already visit their doctors?

Cancel the policy tomorrow and the influences are immediate. What are the Benefits from putting 300 or 400 G Ps back into health care instead of just filling out useless DME Forms? Doctors wait - times decrease, which gives people a shorter wait - time to visit a doctor, which means they will not go to Emerge, decreasing the Overcrowding. Don't forget, Emerge doctors state 50% of those in Emerge should not be there, in other words they should be seeing their G P; they are there because the need to wait 5 - 7 days to see a G P, because they are unavailable, because they are filling out useless forms, for illegal gov't demands.
The taxes used for the DME are now used to pay for all those waiting for surgery, which is good for the client and society.
This will decrease those using private health care systems for bona fide needs that should be within the Universal Health Care System.
The millions used for the DME will now go to the UHCS. Every year there will be a hundred million doing Good.
This cancellation will force the gov't to declare all the demands it has upon the UHCS, as today only the Public's demands are acknowledge, criticized, and evaluated, whether or not they are medically necessary and the demands are still evaluated, where the G Ps doing gov't work just disappear and are not accounted for in Doctor/Client ratios.
This acknowledgment, criticism, and evaluation is what I have done to the Government's demand and we now know how corrupt the policy or demands is. It offers NO Good. Its cancellation will allow the public to evaluate the Government's demands, as to their legality and Good, and whether they are needed or not. Force the gov't to declare all the demands it has upon the UHCS, as today gov't only evaluates the Public's demands, which means only one of the two user groups, the Public and Government, the Public, is acknowledge, criticized, evaluated, whether or not their wants and needs are medically necessary and offer Good.

If we are to have a UHCS for the public all users must be evaluated as to the demands legality and worth. Otherwise the civil servants running our taxes will not have a UHCS to manage.
Reader, how many demands does the Government really have, which are not acknowledged, therefore not funded or managed correctly? This is important, as with the diabetic DME the cost is paid by taxes from the S G office not through the UHCS, so we see funding but the debit of G Ps is not acknowledged. So, how many doctors are taken out of the UHCS just to do these Forms for the driver's medical examination that are not really needed?
If we add all the G Ps taken out of service for Government how many are gone? This impacts all studies about this, as to how many G Ps are available for demands, how many G Ps per population is skewed, as the total availability of G Ps for the UHCS needs is not what is really available. Not until Government declares all its demands can we really see where G Ps are disappearing to.
This will also change how many minutes a G P has per visit now; ten minutes seems inadequate as I'm always delayed concerning the time of appointment and when I really get to visit, as the short time per visit is not adequate.

Firing these ten or twenty senior civil servants will make it a better place for the other 99.99% of civil servants that work hard, fulfill the demands of their Oath of Office and the other Laws of Canada. It will make gov't work a Good place to be again. Would you like to work for Martin now you know what he is doing and how he has just harassed, threatened, humiliated, assaulted and raped me? This begs the question; “What is he doing to his staff?” as he knows they can't go anywhere just like he has played his hate out on me.
This is a Good thing for Canada to fire Martin and his supporters.
*

A living obituary
living testament of impending death

Reader, there you have it. This section is really weird, as I knew something would happen to me when confronting corrupt people, corrupt government employees, and corrupt gov't. One cannot be naïve about this fact. It's begun now. The exposure to someone new, ICBC, and me, the Nigger, not complying with Martin again, the Boss, has changed his position. He escalates his aggressiveness to assault and rape, defamation of my character, registering me as a Criminal, with hoops to jump, which can never be fulfilled and I won't know why and how, and all done in the Public Space, while he is hidden from view in his position of senior civil servant. Once again the Nigger is defiant and exposes him and his perverted “view” of life, his policy of Hate, killing, maiming, and endangerment to life and now he's personalized it. It's not a big step to kill me, as he's taken the first step with the assault and rape, as these are just more examples of how he has de - Humanized me, as that is what these events really do, and they come from his earlier behaviour of raping me of my Charter Rights, Human Rights and Motor Vehicle Rights. So, he has learned from society, gov't, and the RCMP that this is accepted behaviour. What's a little personal assault and rape to him now. It means nothing, so now I've not bowed to him and again rebuked his Hate and exposed him he will move to the next step, as he is already killing on a grand scale, so on a personal scale is only a logical next step for him.
It's really weird waiting for Martin to come and kill me. It didn't take long for him to attack and rape me after his spies informed him that I challenged and exposed him to ICBC and others. How long for this retribution?
I hope he doesn't kill me, as I'm healthy and have lots to see and do yet. But Martin and his supporters really have severe mental health issues and I don't think killers know they are killers until they are. Not these guys though, as I've been at this for eight years now and they knew what they were doing and the consequences before that.
So, if Martin or his supporters kill me you now know why; I stood up for my Rights and Democracy and would not bow to them because I'm Right, its Just, and it is for the Public Good and that is worth standing up for and dying for.
*

I need to say this also, before Martin kills me

What I didn't expect is the level of denial from the public, press, and the police. The apathy concerning this is astounding to say the least but when one comes to understand the consequences of the policy, which really defines Democide and a Crime Against Humanity, one can understand why people turn their heads or pretend they are ostriches with their heads in the ground hiding, but leaving the rest exposed to the harm. A very silly move. A very silly move, as they will also need their Charter Rights, their Human Rights, their Motor Vehicle Rights, as real Democracy is tentative to say least, as has been proved by this illegal policy. We all need the UHCS we have and yet it's jeopardized by the gov't itself; not the Public. And we play the social phenomenon, 'not in my backyard' and 'this is not happening in Canada, I'm not getting involved'. Their fear to not confront this is the flag that something horrible is happening.

The apathy of the Press concerning this is not acceptable in a working Democracy, such as Canada. They interview the survivors of deaths in Overcrowded Emerge, relay the fact to the Public, from Emerge doctors that state 50% of Emerge clients should not be there and when asked 'why' they don't investigate the 'why' of this, and they do not respond to me. They do not investigate why they only report on the wants and needs of the Public and never investigate the Government's demands, leaving only half of the two User Groups of the Universal Health Care System accountable, the Public. A very nasty example of 'bury your head and this is not happening in Canada'. This exemplifies how corrupt this policy and its supporters are, how deep the corruption and harm is.
Their fear to not confront this is the flag that something horrible is happening.

Chief McCaskill's colleague, that is inquiring about this, has guts, fortitude, and the grit to stand up, but just doesn't know it yet.

When one comes to understand the scope of this corruption one sees it is not just BC, but all Canada. The death numbers are horrific. One a month in the ten largest hospitals in BC is 120 for the year, times the eleven years I've been diabetic, is approximately 1 320 deaths due to Overcrowding in BC only. Stop denying this and answer me, say it out loud, what makes the Overcrowding if not people refusing to wait 5 - 7 days to see a G P? Americans? Martians?
Reader, where do you think all these people come from?

The 1st death is an accident. The S G office, the OSMV, the Ministry of Health, and the BCMA know the policy harms and they know the harm is not an irritating boil on someone's bottom. They have somehow balanced off their killing with the believed killing the diabetic does, the unproved difference in killing between non - diabetic and diabetic drivers; I use diabetic drivers as type 2s comprise more than 95% of diabetics and many type 1s do not drive. This is moral/ethical, to balance off killing? I think you are killing, so I can kill? Their letter states they know the harm.
Lets go back to Capital Punishment, to Executions by gov't. This is the proof that Gov't is Executing, as they know they are killing and have balanced this off somehow morally/ethically, compared to a killing, an Accidental killing a diabetic driver is involve in. A constructed killing compared to an accidental killing is what? Homicide. Death through indifference to Human Life. Reckless endangerment to Human Life causing death. But they know they are doing it even after I have exposed them. People walk into Emerge looking for help and die, and gov't lets them. Knowing that if they cancelled the policy change would impact Emerge and they have chosen not too. Conscious killing is an Execution.

The 2nd death should have seen the policy put on hold.
The 3rd death is homicide. The 4th is mass murder or serial killer. The 5th is serial killer or mass murder.
The 12th is Genocide or Democide; large numbers of the public killed by government policy. Only one a month.
And at one death a month that makes it twelve for one hospital and that fulfills the requirements for Democide in one hospital. And you wonder why people have buried this. That people are fearful. And you wonder why Martin has assaulted and raped me and made me a Criminal and is about to kill me.

Reader, do you really think Emerge doctors shout out ; “I can't stand this anymore and the Overcrowding deaths are not acceptable” and call Press Conferences for one death a month? You are not allowed to be this naïve anymore. As BC is about 13 % of Canada's population we need to multiply B Cs numbers by 7.6 We multiply the 1320 for the eleven years I've been diabetic by 7.6, which gives us 10 032 deaths due to Overcrowding at only one death a month for the past eleven years, Canada wide.
But Emerge doctors are not jumping up and down for one death a month are they. The gov't is not fighting me for one death a month are they. Martin is not attacking me for one a month, with the threat of escalation is he. The Press is not hiding this for one death a month are they. This 10 000 is close to the Genocide in Bosnia.

Yes, you are correct, not all Overcrowded Emerge deaths are due to this diabetic policy and coming from the debit of G Ps needed to complete the DME and Form. Even at one a month it is too much, as it need not be. It's the clients the G Ps do not see in a year because they are gone from General Practitioning. These clients have their availability of a reasonable timeline to see a G P changed. A 5 - 7 day wait is not reasonable. Remember, a G P sees about 12 480 clients a year. Times 30 G Ps just for diabetes; 374 400 client visits changed. Then you add all the other G Ps taken for all the other medical conditions supposedly monitored by the OSMV, it's supposed to be 100, so if its 30 G P for diabetes how many for these other conditions.
At only 10 G Ps per medical condition that's 1 000 and that's 25% of the G P population, taken out of service just for the OSMV. How many G Ps are taken from the population of G Ps, which changes the ratio of G P to client that is presented by gov't? How many are like me visiting the G P for their condition anyway? How many other demands upon the UHCS does the gov't have, which are not public? So, what is the real ratio of G P to client? It certainly is not what the gov't and others say it is, as they do not acknowledge Government demands.
12 480 clients for one G P and at only 1 G P per medical condition gives 12 480 x 100 = 1 248 000 client visits changed. And at 5 G Ps per medical condition that is 12 480 x 500 G Ps = 6 240 000 client visits changed. I doesn't take many to change Emerge, as Emerge is only managed on what gov't acknowledges, the Public demand. You need to add all these people to that number so see how funding is not working. Not working as these clients are not acknowledged because gov't has not acknowledged their demand on the G P.
Reader, what are your numbers for whatever you put up for the “where the Overcrowding comes from?”. And then put that on top of these illegal demands of the OSMV and Martin and Government. Added to, because my explanation is really there too.

Lastly, Emerge doctors are not jumping up and down for one extra death a month are they. 120 deaths a year in BC x 7.6 = 912 deaths in Canada for one death a month per year. At one a week or 4 a month we realize 4 deaths x 12 months = 48 per hospital, or 480 for the ten busiest, x 7.6 to bring it up as Canada wide = 3 648 deaths per year, Canada wide. And in eleven years, 3 648 x 11 = 40 128 deaths for just the OSMV illegal demands, who are representatives of the Automobile industry.
What is happening if it is two a week? What is happening in the B C hospital that moved clients into a fast food joint attached to the hospital last month? What death rate in that Overcrowded Emerge do they have? Oh, how we do kill ourselves for our cars and prejudice.

Reader, now you need to think of the Developed World and their gov't policies and demands upon their UHCSs and realize how Grand the killing really is. How corrupt the thinking against the diabetic really is, that demands of our Charter, Human Rights, and MVA are forfeited to control the diabetic and yet these same people do not evaluate themselves and the consequences of their actions. Other Democratic societies also have similar rules of governance, which will have also been broken and they also are having difficulty with their UHCS. Remember, as we age everyone says this will add to the health care demands, which of course they are Right, and this new bubble of older people with additional medical conditions or with greater number of these conditions, will also be monitored by the OSMV. So, when diabetes is 20% what happens? The debit upon G Ps will increase, as well as to the OSMV and its phoney demands, Emerge deaths will increase also, due to these phoney gov't policies. And what is really sick here is these people will also be visiting their G P, which will not be acknowledged by corrupt gov't officials, as they do not acknowledge health care by the disabled today. Imagine the slaughter then.

Yes, my questions and challenges really do impact the world and that is why so many institutions in Canada are fighting this; we are the supposedly nice guys in the small number of Democratic societies, the democracy to work toward, for, and here we are killing each other to the extent we make the killings in Bosnia and Serbia seem what? And its white collar crime not through a Revolution or War. This is peacetime killing and corruption. They really are corrupt and afraid to live the dream of Democracy and Human Rights. This will change how gov't is evaluated, as to its demands upon the Public.

Reader, you cannot be this naïve that you would not expect something to happen other than the stonewalling of my inquiry, the corruption of our Democracy, of the BC Human Rights Tribunal, and the Attorney General's office, as it is supposed to be fighting for B C and the Public, not corrupt civil servants and their illegal policies for something further not to happen.

And Martin, as you are going to kill me I'm going to start driving. My friend's wife is dying, and I visit him and we talk about life and death, she has maybe a month left, I need to drive down island. I'm not going to stop this for someone as sad as you Martin. Your actions are a “Hate Crime”, as you used your position in gov't to attack a person personally, not for the Good of Society, to Harm me, with purpose of Malice, to control, to show who's Boss and who's the Nigger on a Chain and Stick. You used your counterfeit Form, contrived an unknown reason as justification for the Form's use, used it knowing the harm to me socially, emotionally, financially, and physically, you used your position of override an already cancelled license, which legally you had no reason to do. You did this because of Hate, as I have challenged you, your illegal policy, its horrific consequences, and exposed your intrusion into my life with the change of diabetic type forcing me to endure your illegal, humiliating, phoney driver's medical examination more than I should need to.
The last time I exposed you you Assaulted and Raped me, Humiliated me, and turned me into a Criminal. What are you going to do now? You need to escalate this to stalking me and killing the Nigger, as this time I've exposed your Hate Crime, your attack, your assault, and your rape.

Regards


Dave Jenkins












Previous Contacts by letter who will get a copy of this.

Francis M. Deng, UN Secretary General's Special Advisor on the Prevention of Genocide, New York, NY, USA
RCMP Commissioner Elliot, Ottawa
Superintendent Burnside, RCMP, Ottawa
Chief of Police, McCaskill, Winnipeg, Manitoba
Human Rights Watch, New York, NY, USA
Montreal Institute For Genocide and Human Rights Studies, Montreal, Quebec
others are listed in the March 2011 Review, May 2010 Review, and in May 2009 review online at 2diabetes.blogspot.com

Mark Rovere, Associate Director of Health Policy, The Fraser Institute, as his new study again discovered there are no changes to Emerge Overcrowding, long wait times to for surgery and to see a G P, etc. Rovere works for The Fraser Institute, therefore a Conservative, so why hasn't he attacked and exposed gov't demands upon the UHCS, as the basic underpinning of Conservativism is to demand gov't prove their intrusion into the publics life?

MACLEANS, not a new contact but the author of their January 31, 2011article is; Ken MacQueen, “Our health care delusion”. He has no email so this letter, as was done with my letter of March 4, 2011, the Updated Consequences and the May 2010 Review must be sent to Toronto and they will forward it. Again, he only acknowledges the Public's demands upon the UHCS not the Governments, always that greedy Public. We'll see what he does with this awakening to what is really happening with our UHCS and who is making the demands. He gets a copy of this as he needs to see what is happening to me now, as I have again challenged corruption.

ICBC, Kathie Thomson, Director, Provincial Licensing, as my letter of March 4, 2011 has been the instrument of this attack, assault, rape, and the turning of me into a Criminal. ICBC needs to know what has happened.
*

New Contacts by letter

Shirley Bond, the fourth Solicitor General in one year or are you the fifth? You get a copy of this and nothing else as your office and Martin should have all other mailings. If your staff inform you this policy is legal they are lying. If they inform you this inquiry of mine has been resolved they are lying, as that is what your staff did to Kash Heed, but he was forced to resign again before he could respond to my letters.

Atom Egoyan, C/O Ralph Zimmerman, Great North Artist Management, 350 Dupont St., Toronto, ON, M5R 1V9
Egoyan did a film Ararat, 2002, about the Armenian Genocide, maybe he could do a film on Canada's Democide, or as a Professor of film may know someone or have students that have an interest in Democracy, Human Rights, Genocide, and gov't corruption who would take this on.
*

Previous contacts by email who will again be contacted

Beside Subject on email I will write; “I'm now worried about my life, you are witness.”

CTV Winnipeg online news, winnipegnews @ ctv.ca covering story of Sinclair's death and Investigation by Chief of Police, McCaskill, Winnipeg, Manitoba.

Email to lawyers and Assembly of First Nations who are involved in the Investigation of the unexplained deaths of Sinclair and others and others maimed in the Overcrowded Emerge in Winnipeg.

Martin Pollock, counsel for Gerald Briggs, suffered brain damage and Olive Kirkness and survivors, mjp @ pollockandcompany.com or mail @ pollockandcompany.com

Clayton Ruby and Vilko Zbogar, counsel for Brian Sinclair and survivors, vilko.zbogar @ orkinlaw.ca

Tapper Cuddy, LLP, tc @ tappercuddy.com represents Dylan Campbell, 12 yrs old, ctv Winnipeg, Nov 12 update of Nov 10 online article.

Shawn Atleo, National Chief of the Assembly of First Nations, info @ shawnatleo.com
*
Organizations Previously contacted to inform them about the Corruption and Hate concerning Diabetes and the Disabled


Canadian Mental Health Association, ceo @ cmha.ca

Behavioral Diabetes Institute, info @ behavioraldiabetes.org

Disabled World, admin @ disabled-world.com

Jonnie Tunnel, RN, BA, Vancouver Health Authority, jonnie.tunnel @ viha.ca

Medical Reform Group, medicalreform @ sympatico.ca

National Eating Disorder Information Centre, nedic @ uhn.on.ca

West Coast Womens Clinic, info @ westcoastwomensclinic.com
*

Press contacted by email about their recent articles on Health Care where they only acknowledge the demands of the Public but not the demands of the Government. Why do they never acknowledge gov't demands and their consequences.


Christie Blatchford, Globe and Mail, cblatchford @ globeandmail.com

Scott Stinson, National Post, sstinson @ nationalpost.com

Lorraine Mallinder, freelance journalist based in Montreal, lorrainemallinder @ gmail.com
*

New Contacts by email


Jane Elliot, teacher, public speaker, at janeelliott.com and jane @ janeelliott.com

From her homepage; “Jane Elliott, internationally known teacher, lecturer, diversity trainer, and recipient of the National Mental Health Association Award for Excellence in Education, exposes prejudice and bigotry for what it is, an irrational class system based upon purely arbitrary factors. And if you think this does not apply to you. . . you are in for a rude awakening.”
I could not have said what I have found myself within any better. The social phenomenon Elliott works to deconstruct is not just a local phenomenon but a Canada wide problem. Then escalate this to all Democracies and especially those with Universal Health Care Systems, as the impact of the consequences of illegal government policies concerning health are easily recognizable.
Maybe Elliott can use this a working National example. Maybe find someone that may want to study this.