75 pages, mailed May 28, 2009; first Review of corruption concerning this policy

It is said if I don't get your attention immediately your indifference will put me in the Recycle bin

It is said we all need a Good book for the Summer. This is your Must Read.

Non-Fiction Book, TV, or Newspaper Headings


Killing and Slaughter in the BC Emerge

or

Killing and Slaughter due to Indifference to Human Life

or

Human Road Kill in Hospital Emerge

or

Just another Pig Farm incident that everyone is Afraid to acknowledge?

or

Know anyone who has died in an Overcrowded Emerge facility and the death is unexplained?
It is now explained.
What are you going to do? Do you have the guts to inform your friends?

or

As of today, June 16, 2009, 120 Canadians have died in Afghanistan.
They died for Democracy not an Opium War.
2974 deaths on 9/11
3000 plus killed yearly in BC emerge due to unjustified, illegal social policy

or

The Killing of the Lambs in the Emerge.

or

Canadians make a Killing at the Olympics; of Tourists



If you think the above is bizarre wait until you read the rest and then think of your health and those that are unhealthy.

Go to page 56 to see why You have received a copy of this.

Chapters

Opening page 3


Chapter 1, Why you need to read this (10 factors) page 6
Reader, I know this Introduction is long but it is Juicy and Worthwhile page 8
Fascist defined page 10
Nazi defined page 10


Chapter 2, A more complete History of the Diabetic Policy and its Consequences page 15
Five Points of Engagement page 15
Coroner's Office page 18


Chapter 3, The Diabetic Driver's Medical Examination page 18
Vaginae page 19
Pissing Contest page 20
Patriarchal Society and the Matriarchs page 20
Matriarchal Mommas (Gang) page 21
More of The Diabetic Driver's Medical Examination page 23


Chapter 4, Lies, lies, and more lies page 24
I've just experienced another Consequence of the OSMV drivers Policy, New Corruption page 26
Coroner's Office Again page 30
BBB stuff. The Bullshit Baffles Brains stuff page 32


Chapter 5, Stolen Research page 41
Reader, who are these Owners of the research? page 42
What is the cost of responding to the stolen research? page 43
Water boarding page 44
Lets see what these people have Really done with the Presentation of the Research page 44
What is being done about Copyright infringement, Intellectual Property Rights theft, and Intent of Use misuse?
Page 44
The Numbers of the Killing and Slaughter page 45


Last Chapter, Conclusion page 46
This is for those Readers that read Conclusions first to see if the rest of the stuff may be worth reading
page 46
How many Ghosts are to be created due to this policy? page 47


What I Want page 47
Financial Penalties for Harm Done page 47
My Demands page 50



Who & Why YOU are included page 56



Dave Jenkins
3107 Tanglewood Way
Nanaimo, BC V9T 5A5
dwjenkins @shaw.ca

May 28, 2009

Minister of Health (And all others listed on the last pages. You didn't get this accidentally)
Ministry of Health Services
PO Box 9050 Stn Prov Gov't
Victoria, BC, V8W 9E2

Opening

Reader, you are probably reading this for the Prime Minister, or the Premier of BC, or Members of Parliament or Legislature or your manager. The USA Secretary of the Dept of Health & Human Resources also gets a copy because she is trying to bring forward a universal health care system and really needs to know why ours is dysfunctional today. Also, fifty or so research articles were stolen from the USA, by Canada, by the BC Office of the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles, therefore the Solicitor General's office, in order to try and justify its demands upon our health care system.)
Reader, you may be reading this for someone and be making the decision whether or not you forward this on.
Weather you like this or not you have an obligation to pass this letter on. You have an legal obligation to pass this on. You have a moral/ethical obligation to pass this on. You have a medical obligation to pass this on in order to protect your manager, family, or partner, and yourself. Pass it on to those looking for an explanation.

If you have Diabetes or any Disability and drive you need to read this. If you take care of or are influenced by diabetes, a disease, or disability and drive you need to read this.
If you believe in the Charter and what it gives us you need to read this. If you believe in Human Rights you need to read this. If you believe gov't should only be our lives if they prove a real need and there is Good then you better read this.
If you believe in our Universal Health Care System and are perplexed by the long wait times to see a GP, the overcrowding in Emerge, and the long wait times for surgery you need to read this.
If you have had someone Die in emerge and the misfortunate doctor has informed you or a friend that the death was unexpected and unexplained you need to read this.
You need to take the Time to read this. You need to take the Time to internalize this and understand this horror.
Pass this on to your manager. You can pass this on to whom ever you like. The more people the better.
*
Lets take the Prime Minister of Canada in order to build a scenario of what is described in the following letter and 'updated consequences'.
So, whom ever is reading this you will need to decide, “what are you really made of”. The buck stops today.

The PM is married, has a couple of children, who are out of school for the summer, and the PM is also home for the recess of gov't. Let's say they have a holiday in BC, or later, maybe for the Olympics as he will definitely be there. Lets say a child gets sick and rushed to Emergency only to be told to take a number and wait. Yes the emerge is overcrowded as this hospital is one of the ten busiest in BC; the overcrowding is what is so called normal.
The doctors do not have enough Time to really study the child, the Thinking Time to process what is happening. They do not have the Time to follow the complaint as there is not enough Space and Time, as they must move on to the new clients. The child is sent home. The child returns as the condition worsens. Do I need to go on? Lets just say for this scenario the child remains healthy.
This scenario was just played out in Victoria, BC, with Sanjay Ablak, who passed away December 08, 2008. His family and brother-in-law, Mr. Pabbi, have hired counsel to look into the death. Mr. Pabbi gets a copy because it seems he has just experienced the consequences of the policy, an unexpected and unexplained death. (Times Colonist, A4, December 16, 2008, “Slain man's family hires lawyer to probe records”
Readers, “What's your manager going to do after experiencing something like the above due to unexplained overcrowding?
What is your manager going to do if you give this letter to her or him after the event?
What is your manager going to do if you give this letter to him or her before the event?

Reader, as just stated, this scenario has just played out with Sanjay Ablak. The survivors know there is something wrong with the health care given and they know it has nothing to do with the doctor as the NEWS article did not say the doctor is at fault, leaving readers to understand the system is at fault, unexplained but faulty. They've hired a lawyer to investigate.
This unexplained death is explained through an understanding of the diabetic driver's policy and its consequences. This death exemplifies why the gov't has not acknowledged the consequences of the policy and yet have refused to even put the policy on hold until a review of the policy and its consequences has been done. (I have been questioning the gov't about this policy since 2002, through letters and Human Rights Complaints, and they have stonewalled about changing the policy knowing full well the horrific consequences.)
Reader, the following explains the long wait times to see a G P, the emerge overcrowding, problems with ambulatory care, and the long wait times for surgery. It explains why the doctors are holding Press conferences to complain about the unexpected and unexplained deaths in emerge. The doctors are really trying to cope with the excessive killing and slaughter in emerge. They don't know “the why of the overcrowding” because they are emerge doctors, not G P who are forced to fulfill the driver's medical examination, DME, and who do not make connections to “the why of the overcrowding” themselves.
You will read about the corruption in gov't, misinformation, lack of information, a breached settlement agreement concerning a Human Rights Discrimination Complaint, a phoney amendment to that breach, charades, fall guys, scapegoats, lies, and the recent theft of 174 scientific research articles to justify the policy. All in order to protect the gov't from taking any responsibility for the illegal policy and its consequences.
It is not a nightmare, this is very real.
*
Welcome to the world of diabetes. This letter has happened because I had the audacity to challenge the gov't to explain itself concerning diabetes, its driving policy, the horrific consequences of that policy, and what they have just done to justify the killing and slaughter as a result of that policy.
Important. My questions are of such worth, merit, and value, that the gov't changed policy to get rid of my Human Rights Discrimination complaint, #1954. Think about that. I'm just some guy out here in the public space that discovered such horror coming from gov't policy, which they know about but is hidden, that it changed social policy, but has stonewalled on other promises of change, failed to implement but went through the motions.
Reader, you know how hard it is to change policy. So, why and how was it done so quickly concerning my H R Discrimination complaint? That's right. The horror of the consequences of the policy is so great that after I made them public, through my correspondence, some changes were voluntarily made.
Not to gloat but how long has it taken you to change policy? There really is something wrong with the picture isn't there; for this to happen so fast and I didn't even demand or request it. I requested the documentation that was used to justify the policy and listed the horrific consequences. I did not demand the changes offered in the out of court settlement agreement, which was broken and not repaired. Think about that.
Reader, nothing was given to justify the policy little lone the consequences and that was 2002 and nothing has arrived yet, except for the recent stolen 174 research articles.
“Sorry, stolen research articles are not allowed to be used to make social policy or anything else.” (Reader, you really need to say sentences such as this as the people that stole the documents will just do this as if it is ok to do. It is not ok to do and you need to say this throughout this letter, concerning the things that have been done to me, therefore you.)

Reader, the changes needed to stop the long wait times to see G Ps, the emerge overcrowding, and long wait times for surgery has not materialized as promised. This means the killing and maiming in the emerge is acceptable to the gov't or it would have changed policy in 2004 with my Human Rights complaint or in 2002 when I began my inquiry.
So, the BC gov't has consciously and deliberately continued with the diabetic policy, disabled policy, knowing the horrific consequences. (Diabetics are labeled disabled for driving.)
How many deaths, the unexpected and unexplained, are really explained by the consequences of the policy that I have confronted and challenged for the past seven ( 7 ) years? Read on and you will discover a monster in our society and it is not the diabetic or disabled.
This is in reference to a senior civil servant that wrote the “policy saves lives”. When challenged it was not proven. In other words he wrote that diabetics are killers and the policy against them decreases that killing. It is just Bullshit.
This means I take your basic Right to Life away. That although no documents prove your guilt, we, the gov't, know you diabetics, the disabled, are killing through vehicular accidents, and you are to be managed and penalized no matter what you think even if the demands of the Charter, the HR Code, and the Motor Vehicle Act are not fulfilled. The “Other” has been constructed. The diabetic as pariah is entrenched for gov't to do what ever they want, like stealing 174 research articles.
This is why I now use the words, Killing, Slaughter, Maiming, Corruption, Lies and Bullshit; these people have earned it and I am going to give it back to them.

The driving force behind this letter and the 'updated consequences' is again from the consequences of this gov't policy. They have just now again negatively influenced me, moving from Personal assault on my character, turning me into the Other, the pariah, now to jeopardizing my Physical Health, my Life. The gov't does not have the Right to do this, legal or moral. I needed spinal surgery, which I was told I needed to wait two years plus. Wrong. This additional corruption and assault is explained within the following letters.
So, if you know someone with a disability or someone that has experienced a death in emerge and it was unexpected and unexplained you need to read on. If you do not like corruption in gov't you need to read on. If you like Democracy you need to read on. If you work through the Five Points of Engagement you need to read on. If you are one of those that read, only to say , “boy, am I glad this didn't happen to me”, you really need to read on.
Well, reader, are you going to read on? Are you going to recycle this without informing the PM or whom ever you read for?
No one has the Right to be Indifferent about this matter anymore. The Killing and Slaughter need to be stopped.
*


Reader, I tried this in Bullet form, Point form, something quick to read, like the “Chapters” page, it read so bizarre that you would not believe this is happening in Canada or that it is real. And yet, you are the Press, Politicians, and Clergy, or spiritual leaders, and knowledgeable people, which means you know there are monsters in society. However, once and a while we need to be reminded they are always here and there are also those that need to be told of the monsters.
So, what is happening to Me, as well as You, must be done in Story Form, so you can follow the history of the Corruption, its growth, and the horrific Consequences of the policy. You know its horrific when the gov't misinforms, lies, and steals documents and presents them in an early Dismiss Human Rights Discrimination Complaint in order to protect itself. The early Dismiss is not in front of the public but evaluated by one Human Rights member only, only paper presentations, no human witness . The stolen research material has been presented through the back door, I caught the gov't, and it has lied about its actions concerning this theft. (I have written the RCMP about this Intellectual Property theft, as well as most of the owners of the articles, through the journals, and a number of Consulates, as they represent the countries who have had their IP stolen.)
Reader, there is a “Wholeness” that must be learned concerning the governments presentations, its driver's policy, the Consequences of the policy, and the theft of protected research in order to justify an illegal policy. The gov't does not want you to learn of the “Parts”, leading to a wholeness, as there are many Parts and they certainly are not going to inform you of their knowledge of these Parts and how they impact other things, such as the emerge overloads and my newly discovered Part, the long wait times for surgery. Divide and conquer is the old adage.
You will need to be patient with the number of times I state the Instruments of Democracy; the Charter, the HR Code, and the MVA, as the gov't does not acknowledge their real demands, little lone state they have fulfilled them. As a matter of fact the OSMV changed the wording of the MVA to get its way. How corrupt is that?
The Five Points of Engagement are also brought forward numerous times as they need to be attached to all the parts that make “Wholeness” or the parts will just remain parts, with no Context, with no Relevance, with no Meaning to the Connections needed that will explain the Discrimination, money shuffling, broken settlement agreement, lies, theft, and the killing, slaughter, and maiming caused by the illegal policy of the Office of the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles.
Always remember the gov't wrote this about me, that the policy saves lives. In other words I am a killer and the policy decreases that killing. This is public statement. This is public policy. This is corruption. This is a lie. This is hate.
Reader, you'll know who the killer really is before you finish this letter and the “updated consequences”.
*

A suggestion; when you begin to question what I have written and just do not believe this is really happening take a break from this letter and begin reading the 'updated consequences' as it uses numbers, from gov't, instead of words, to explain the corruption concerning the policy and its consequences. The numbers take you to the “Wholeness” that I talk about, the Big Idea. There are no statistics to screw with your mind. There are no formula to screw with your mind. The 'updated consequences' will allow you to understand why the Supervising Counsel for the A G office is directly involved. Why a huge law firm like Heenan Blaikie is involved. Why the gov't has played charades, lied, stolen research, and lied again in order to get their way and not take any responsibility for their actions.


Chapter 1
Why you need to read this. (10 factors)
Reader, I know this Introduction is long but it is Juicy and Worthwhile.
Fascist defined
Nazi defined


Why you need to read this. (10 factors)
Firstly, if you believe in the instruments of democracy, the Charter, the Human Rights Code, and the Motor Vehicle Act, then you are involved. If you don't believe in these instruments you are the problem and I'm your enemy. Simple.

Secondly, you have a Duty or an Obligation to read all of this as it involves Corruption within government and the Consequences of that Corruption; whether you like it or not you are involved.

Third, if you have diabetes, take care of someone that does, or are impacted by diabetes you are involved. If you have a disability you are involved. If you represent Canadians, through any organization, you are involved, because these people work you or you represent them.

Fourth, if you have had someone Die or be Maimed in an Emergency Facility or know of someone that has and it has been listed as one of those “unexpected and unexplained deaths or harms” then you need to read this.
Afterwards, you will have a choice to make. You will just accept the unexplained death and be apathetic or indifferent to the death or maiming and stick your head in the dirt and pretend it didn't happen or you will hire a lawyer.
Your lawyer needs Two things, the knowledge that she or he will really be able to work for Justice, something that may only come once in a lawyer's lifetime of work.
The second thing is that the lawyer needs to smell blood.

Fifth, if you are a Fascist or Nazi that is involved in this you better read this because I'm not going to bow down to you or kiss your ass. I'm your enemy and I am not afraid of you.

Sixth, if you are of the Jewish persuasion you need to read this. If you are of any minority religion, belief system, or colour, or culture you need to read this. You have a duty to inform your friends.

Seventh, An Introduction (this is a long one, lots of Parts are brought forward, Context) my drivers license shows I'm an middle aged white guy with diabetes. If the Fascists and Nazis within the BC Solicitor General's office, the Office of the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles, and their supporters have their way you are next. The driving policy against the diabetic driver is right out of a Fascist and Nazi mindset or group think.
Reader, the Draft, (coming from the out of court settlement), and its offspring are not some musings of Lisa Raitt, the Minister of National Resources, stated in privacy, but recorded by a staff member, and then lost and found by the Press for all to hear. They are Pubic documents for you to read. The Underpinnings for Policy. I was also given the opportunity to review the Draft. It turns out I needed to Deconstruct it and Criticize it.
Corruption and Hate is written for all to see within the Draft and New Policy concerning diabetics, that the OSMV needed to write due to my Human Rights Discrimination complaint, 2004 - 2006. I cannot mention the second Draft as it is listed as Confidential. You'll need a court order to see that one. Suffice to say I still here complaining.
Still here because the OSMV has not presented any legal documents, a Policy, justifying what it says and does to diabetic drivers, therefore legalizing the policy. Little lone justifying the horrific consequences of that policy.
So, what does it do to justify the policy?
The OSMV has just presented 174 Scientific articles from the who's who of Scientific Journals to justify the diabetic policy.
However, all or most are protected by Copyright, Intellectual Property Rights, and Intent of Use. No Permission Forms were presented to demonstrate these journals had been contacted and Permission given to use the research for a foreign countries social policy that has not been justified before.
That is Right. The OSMV stole these works to justify a policy that had not been justified before. They were presented through the law firm Heenan Blaikie as the OSMV hired H B to fight me. 700 lawyers riding around on the laurels of Trudeau and Chretien and I'm supposed to grovel to them and pretend there is no such thing as Copyright, Intellectual Property Rights, and Intent of Use. Go to the BC OSMV website and you will see they protect all their material with those tools of protection, to stop any liability and protect IP.
Reader, do you think the OSMV would inform the owners of the research about the ongoing unjustified policy and its horrific consequences or just slip the research in, through a Human Rights Complaint. Feigned legality through association.
One research article states never use, that means never, ever, under any circumstances. And yet behind everyone's back the OSMV and its counsel slips this research in as bona fide research with permission to use. Permission to use for a foreign countries social policy that has never been justified before? This defines corruption. This defines theft. This defines breach of Trust on the governments side, as well as the legal side. If I had not just informed of the charade you would have 'just believed' it was legal, as look where it came from.

(Don't worry about the term 'Fascist' and 'Nazi' as they will be explained below and how this behaviour is within the government agencies and their followers or supporters. Fascist and Nazi behaviour is not stealing Science, just theft. Using it without permission to justify social policy against minorities, to correct some perceived social woe, and sneaking it into governance, is.)
*
Reader, this month is the celebration of D-Day, the beginning of the end of the Nazi war and the Fascists. Lets be real here. It never ends. Our men and women in Afghanistan are being killed and maimed for Democracy. It is not a war on opium. Over a hundred have died there now.
My dad fought in World War II and stayed in the army and was one of the first Blue hats for the UN, 1961-62. He spent a year in Palestine representing Canada. He retired to the Canadian Red Cross. He worked internationally for the Red Cross in Bangladesh and India, and was the first Canadian to be a manager of such a world project. He did evaluations for relief in the war zones such as the Horn of Africa and Viet Nam. He spend approximately ten years in Pakistan working with the Afghanistan refugees coming from the Russian invasion. He received Pakistan's highest award for a foreigner working in their country. He received an Order of Canada for his work for Canada in such matters.
His brother, Walter, landed in WW II Hong Kong with a wooden rifle. He spent the rest of World War in a Japanese prisoner of war camp; a Concentration Camp; he was also a slave. He went over there 210 pounds and came back at 86 pounds. Every reader of Jewish persuasion, you know what I am talking about.
So, after knowing these two men I am not going to let this month go by without defending what they did for Canada and the world. What the new young men and women are doing for Canada today.
They have a legacy and I am not going to let what they fought against and suffered through to Ooze itself into Canada and my life without shouting Lies, Theft, Foul, Fascist, Nazi, and Corruption.

Let the people doing this to me explain themselves within a Public Inquiry. Let them explain themselves to the Canadian public. Let them explain themselves to the Canadian public in a Court case with a jury. Let them explain themselves to the Canadian Free Press. Let them explain themselves to the world. Let them explain themselves to all those that have had a loved one or companion die in an Emerge Facility only to have the doctors say the overcrowding and underfunding is unexplainable; it is NOT. Let them explain why they have continued to run the diabetic policy after writing to me that they knew of the demands upon the medical system, in other words the OSMV, the Solicitor's Generals office, knew the horrific consequences of the policy and have done nothing to stop the killing and slaughter and maiming.
Reader, they continued with the policy knowing that they did not have any documents to prove the need for the policy, knowing the medical examination forced upon diabetic drivers and doctors had not been proved to be able to do what it is alleged to be able to do, knowing the horrific consequences, and knowing they had not proved any Good from the Policy, (how corrupt and sick is that?). Knowing diabetics visit doctors at a rate of 8-1 or 20 to the 1 demanded by the OSMV.
So, after 7 years of stonewalling they now steal the documents to justify the policy. They can not steal documents proving the medical exam can do what it is alleged to be able to do, or steal stuff to prove Good, or steal stuff to prove the horrific consequences are acceptable. The OSMV has tried to bury this under the stolen research. Interesting stuff, eh. Parts.

Reader, there is a story here to read because what happens firstly impacts the future; you will come to see there is a strategy of procrastination and stonewalling to delay the confrontation of the corruption within the OSMV, therefore the BC Solicitor Generals office, as it manages the OSMV; all the while the killing, slaughter, and maiming in Emerge goes on. And now I have experienced the surgery wait lists, there due to Greed and Corruption from the OSMV.
There is a strategy to prolong my inquiry into this matter and its consequences as the OSMV broke the out of court settlement agreement and subsequently contrived a phoney amendment concerning that breach; there was a real charade, with smokescreen and fall guy. The lawyers that contrived the phoney amendment must have taken Drama and Shakespeare in university; the lawyers involved were the lawyer from Heenan Blaikie and the Supervising lawyer in the Attorney General's office, as well as the Deputy of OSMV. The breach has yet to be rectified through no procrastination on my behalf.
Additionally, there is the delay of fulfilling what was promised within the out of court settlement agreement, the promise of the policy concerning diabetic drivers, promised in 2006, then 2007. Nothing yet.
Important, Reader, I was never given a Policy to begin with, in other words there never was one. But, the inference with the Settlement Agreement is that the OSMV is just tweaking an existing Policy. Interesting, eh.

Reader, the only justification for the policy is the statement from the Deputy of SMV that the policy is in its “view” ok to do.
Bullshit.
Civil servants give up their “view” when they become civil servants. They have rules, law, and statutes to follow; such as the Charter, the HR Code, and the Motor Vehicle Act. Can't fulfill the demands don't do it. Simple.
So, society is misled by the OSMV in that you believe the Policy is legally justified by the Charter, the HR Code, and the Motor Vehicle Act and actually there for you and me to read. It hasn't been there. There is nothing.
Therefore, the horrific consequences are not legally justified, or morally justified, if that can be done and is acceptable. I don't know why the OSMV is allowed to deliberately Harm? The conscious harm from the unjustified policy compared to the supposed accidental Harm of the diabetic driver?
The emerge deaths due to the overcrowding are just road kill to these car industry people, the OSMV and its supporters. But now I've challenged them and not gone away they will do anything to hide what they are doing. Interesting stuff.

Reader, you know what is interesting with a complaint that goes on this long? A actual benefit for all of us, yourself and me, is that over time, a history is made, we can really see how corrupt the OSMV is. How the corruption has Escalated over time. And all the while the killing and slaughter and maiming in Emerge goes on and the doctors are still pulling their hair out trying to understand the why of the emerge overcrowding, G P long wait times, the killing and slaughter, etc, etc.
Reader, you must remember that diabetes has increased from 5%, when I was diagnosed in 1999, to 9% or more today. So, the demand upon G P has almost doubled. What does this inform us about todays consequences of the policy? And you wonder why the gov't steals research to justify the policy in an early Dismiss Discrimination complaint, out of sight of public scrutiny? Are you feeling manipulated by gov't yet. Do you want to visit the emerge for health care? How about needing surgery such as I needed?
*
Reader, I know this Introduction is long but it is Juicy and Worthwhile.

So far, my complaint involves the Ministry of Health, Solicitor Generals' office, Attorney Generals' office, OSMV, diabetics, the disabled, gov't lawyers, one of the most prestigious law firms in Canada, the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, Human Rights Tribunal, the Motor Vehicle Act, my rights, your rights, money shuffling for the diabetic policy, lack of funding for medical operations due to the shuffle, arbitrary decisions about what is a medical necessity and what isn't, breach of my settlement agreement, a phoney amendment to it, a charade to present the phoney amendment as something legal, a Draft of the diabetic drivers' Policy to come, which is corrupt in itself, a New Policy, (it turns out it was just another Draft), and the lack of the Policy concerning diabetic drivers that was promised in 2006, then 2007. It is now 2009.
It now includes more gov't lies and the 174 stolen research articles. This has taken my inquiry out of my hands as the OSMV has also used a Notary and law firm out of Alberta to justify the use of the scientific articles, I think that is what her stamp and signature were used for, which is just another charade. This makes my complaint inter-provincial or Canada wide, and the theft of the science makes this International in scope.
How do I challenge this? It would take about $100 000 to go to the Supreme Court of BC for the breached settlement agreement and the OSMV just uses our taxes to fight me. Now that defines discrimination.
*
Speaking of the Draft that was presented for me to Review. This Draft, part of the out of court settlement agreement, of the supposed Policy against diabetic drivers, and the New Policy I received after that Review, has two or three pages of medical conditions a diabetic may have express or appear due to diabetes. This is only After having diabetes for ten, or fifteen, or twenty years. Remember, these medical conditions are not dependent upon diabetes for their expression; you are just led to believe this. They may happen to you as well. I don't see you being called a Killer and being Penalized.
Reader, these 'medical conditions of the Future' are used to justify the Policy against the diabetic driver Today. Diabetics are penalized today for something that may happen in 10 or 15 or 20 years.
No, this is not Tom Cruise in the movie the “Minority Report”.

That is right, you have read this correctly. Conditions that may express in the future are being used to legally justify a social policy today. Is this insane or what? Bye the way, it is against the law in Canada to penalize someone for a belief of what my happen in the future. Against the law except in Fascist and Nazis states.

Do I really need to inform you that this defines Fascism and Nazism? It is based upon economics and politics.

So, you hate a person of difference so bad you write social policy based upon events that may happen in the future.
You are going to solve societies woes with control of the disabled, the diabetic, those needle users, the sickly of society.
Bullshit. The sickness is within those that wrote, and those that proofread, and those that presented the policy.

Secondly, there is a second thing about this twisted, sick, corrupt thinking.
The average age of a person that may become type 2 diabetic, the most prevalent type, I believe it is about 40 years of age, 49 for me. The average Canadian retires about 60. This means for me these futuristic conditions will only express after I have retired from Commercial driving. My license was Class 4, for taxi, small passenger vehicle, school bus, or ambulance. No air-brake vehicles or large trucks or vehicles.
That is right. Conditions that may express after a Commercial driver has retired from driving Commercially.
How insane is this ploy to justify the policy. A Nazi charade and no recognition of the Timelines associated with diabetes and work. In my case the very reason for the license in the first place; diabetes and work.
Also, I do not know if these future medical conditions impact type 2 diabetics within the same timeline as they impact a type 1 diabetic, as most type 2 manage their diabetes without medical intervention.
I believe the old medications, the old insulins, the old social status of diabetes have a lot to do with future medical conditions that a diabetic may encounter? The new insulins, insulin pumps, medications, and doctor care are changing the world of diabetes and the social stigma.
Also, people like me are changing the world for diabetics as I am confronting the Fascists, Nazis, and the anti-diabetic lobby about their fear and loathing of people of difference and needle users and their hate.

So, we have a policy based upon future medical conditions that may express, not dependent upon diabetes, only after having diabetes for decades, and the driver has retired. (Don't forget my Complaint has a focus of Commercial driving and type 2.)
This defines corruption. It defines stupidity, therefore incompetency. It defines Hate. It defines people that do not think. It defines people that cannot grow and mature. It defines people that are irresponsible. It defines people that really think they are above you and me.
So, why are these people writing social policy?

My point is, remember how in the opening I said there are “Parts” and there are “Connections” to be made in order to understand the “Wholeness”, to really see what is going on? How can the OSMV, its academic researcher, its lawyers, and writers of Drafts, Proofreaders, and unknowns not make the connection to age, future diseases, Working Timeline, and Retirement? This is just feigned ignorance.
It is just more Bullshit to deceive you. To mislead you. To denigrate my character. To entrench the idea of “Other”.
Reader, you need to make the connections and ask why the OSMV has not. This is why the “Story Form needs to be told so you can turn the pages back and forth and make the connections. To see how deep the Corruption is.”

Reader, do you really believe these people are stupid? I don't. But the question needed to be asked. Are they ignorant of what they do? No. No because they are fighting to protect their behaviour. Are they corrupt? Yes.
Their actions define Hate, so much Hate those that write this stuff do not care that they have not fulfilled the demands of the Charter, the HR Code, and the Motor Vehicle Act. They do not care that the Timeline they have constructed to justify the policy does not meet their own statements. They never talk about the Working Timeline of a commercial driver. Why?
Because they know the timeline will deconstruct their presentation and you will ask why have you folks forgot such an important thing as the timeline of work?
Reader, these Fascists and Nazis don't tell you a lot of stuff.
Think about how corrupt this thinking is. Think about how corrupt the people are that accepted this thinking for a government document, proof read it, and then presented it to me, the public, as the underpinning of the New Social Policy.
Reader, I deconstruct the Draft with my Review and it comes back again in the New Policy. Do you think it is in the second Draft? The second Draft is classified as confidential? Why has this designation be added?
Again, this is not the Minister of National Resources, Lisa Raitt, stating something in private and it ending up in public. This is a government document, a very public document, written to justify an unjustified policy that has horrific consequences. The Draft uses Fearful language, misrepresents diabetes through arithmetic games done to lead astray, misinforms, does not inform, and breaks the law by penalizing diabetics for things that may happen in the future.
*
Fascist defined
Reader, I mention Fascist in my opening statement above and that I would define it. The use above has helped as it is used in context. Fascists are people that tell us that they will take care of our Rights, that they will manage us, they will take care of us and we don't have to worry about anything, especially our Rights.
Our Rights today, in Canada, come from our Human Rights Code, the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, and the Motor Vehicle Act; these instruments make our Democracy. Those that are involved in my inquiry and now Human Rights Complaints care nothing for these instruments of Democracy. Without fulfilling their demands the people are by definition Fascist. Not lazy. Not stupid. But corrupt. They are my enemy. Enemies of Canada. I do not need to be Tolerant of these people. We need to talk about them and cull them from gov't and places of influence.
They have had seven years with me to justify the policy and they have not. In reality they have had since the Canadian Human Rights Act, 1978, or the Charter, 1982, or the amended MVA of BC, 1996. They know the harm and have continued on with their corrupt behaviour in spite of this. They have tried to slip this corrupt Draft into our lives as policy, through an out of court settlement agreement; presented through the back door. When challenge by another HR complaint they have now stolen 174 Scientific documents to justify the policy and lied when I caught them; again presented through the back door.
Don't forget the Draft and New Policy do not have signatures on them. Back door stuff never has a logo does it.
Reader, when the settlement agreement was broken the Deputy OSMV blamed a lower level civil servant for the breach, supposedly a key member of the team writing the Draft.
Is this why the key member of the Draft writing team quit writing? The corruption he or she was faced with? The lies and hate?
All this aside, this blame is just another example of corruption, the bosses never take responsibility; 'the lackey or underling is always blamed' and 'they are the problem not us' and 'the diabetic is the problem'.
It is great stuff to read, isn't it.
So, we do not know who wrote these documents. We do not know who sanctioned these documents to be presented publicly? Someone proof read them. Just as Supervising Counsel review lawyers presentations.
The Draft and its blame for societies woes on the diabetic, thus supposedly justifying the control over these pariahs with future events, moves these people further to the right than the Fascist. They have now moved from Fascist to Nazi. (Don't worry, I'll explain this monster word.)
So, what we have is these unknown people penalizing me for something that may happen in the future? Every one of you that were involved in the Draft, its Proofreading, and presentation should be fired and in front of a judge and jury.
You should be in front of a Judge explaining your Hate literature.
You should be in front of a Judge, in a Public Inquiry, explaining yourselves.
B'Nai Brith, you better wake up. All minority, cultural, and religious organizations, you better wake up.
Premier, you better wake up.
Prime Minister, you better wake up.
Canada, you better wake up.
This is like the abused wife. She locks the door to feel safe but in reality she locks the monster inside.
*
Nazi defined
Lets review the Medical conditions presented by the Draft and its writers and presenters. The medical conditions listed are not dependent upon diabetes, may only express after the diabetic has been diabetic for decades , have not been proven to cause accidents or driver mishaps in regard to any attachment with diabetes, and are used against the diabetic driver today, in order to justify the anti-diabetic policy.

Reader, don't forget what you are not told. If these medical conditions are responsible for a driver mishap aren't they responsible for the accident, not diabetes? Just another charade within charades.
So, it's the medical conditions that are responsible for the driver mishap not diabetes.
Reader, you really need to understand this as the 'wrong thinking' being presented here in order to manipulate you. To scare you. To use Fear in order to raise the Fear/Risk factor so you will support these idiots as they try to persuade you that although they have not fulfilled the demands of the Charter, the HR Code, and the MVA and the Five Points of Engagement, in order to justify the policy, the future medical conditions are so horrific they in themselves are justification enough. The use of Fear is an old ploy, isn't it. It's a standard ploy of corrupt presentations, isn't it. Fear mongering.
Do you see how you must really deconstruct all that is presented by the Nazi. This corruption is also an excellent example of the use of Fearful language to help construct the diabetic as the Other, therefore the OSMV and its anti-diabetic lobby can say and do anything they please because the Other has no Rights.
So, they use future medical conditions to justify today's social policy and yet diabetes is the focus not the condition responsible for the driver mishap. And yet, if a non-diabetic has an inclination for these medical conditions they are not penalized today for the possible expression of the medical condition in the future. So, why the diabetic?
And yet, if a non-diabetic encounters these medical conditions they will undoubtedly manage the conditions themselves, under doctor care, and be managed by the OSMV, and if the condition is responsible for a driver mishap the condition will be blamed. So, why the difference with diabetes?
So, lets blame the condition that a diabetic may encounter in the future for the driver mishap it may cause, if it ever expresses in the future and is really responsible for the driver mishap.
This is not to much to ask is it? Equality for the diabetic. Manage medical conditions in Real Time, as they are with non-diabetic drivers.
Of course you will need to stand up and confront the Nazis in government and their lobbyists.

Let's bring a person of Jewish persuasion back into focus. Did you know that some people of the Jewish persuasion can have a genetic test, which will inform them of certain genes or genetic markers that if the husband and wife have these markers or genes the baby will have a medical condition that is considered life threatening for the baby.
To say the least this is an enormous problem for people of our new age or culture. The decision to have the test, the decision to review the test, the decision to intervene, that is to say to not even conceive, or to intervene after conception. Reader, you play out some other scenarios involving different cultures and color because this 'gene awareness' is not only happening to those of the Jewish persuasion.
The above exemplifies why these people have moved from Right of center, to Fascist, to Nazi.
Hold it. Hold it. Those of the Jewish persuasion don't get all the gene glory.
Diabetes has a gene or marker too. So, the believed future of these genes is being penalized today?

My point is, the people that wrote the Draft and its supporters are really saying, “The woes of society will be corrected by this policy”, “This policy will help segregate those with this disease”, and “No proof but we're going forward anyways”.

Lastly, the OSMV and its supporters base this policy on nothing but a “view”, no Charter proof of need, no HR Code proof of need, no MVA proof of need, the DME or intervention does not do what it is alleged to do, the consequence are never acknowledged, there is no Good for the diabetic little lone society. (Explained more fully below in the Five Points of Engagement) This policy is then slid through governance because the diabetic is such a problem all the tools of democracy can be disregarded or forgotten or unnoticed because the woes of the state needed to be protected at all cost, even if it means the Charter, HR Code, and MVA demands are not fulfilled. This is what Fascists and Nazis do, blame societies woes on someone, the unprotected, the disabled, and then slip their wants in through the back door.
As far as I know Canada is still a democratic society. Not a state run by Fascists and Nazis.

So, why are they doing it? When challenged as to why they are doing this these people have procrastinated, misled, misinformed, lied, used Fearful language, offered future medical conditions, and now presented stolen science as justification for their behaviour and lied after I caught them.
Don't forget, diabetes is also said to have a gene or marker, but having such does not guarantee the gene will express. A gene pool of corruption and disease?
Some diabetics use needles. We know the problem with illegal needle use and legal needle exchanges. Needles equal moral bankruptcy, which invites outside management. Needles by themselves scare people. Is this a secret disgust of the Nazi that drives them to hate the diabetic?
Diabetes is supposed to express due to fatness or obesity. Diabetes makes people fat. Our society views fatness and obesity as morally wrong, with diabetes as punishment. Crazy thinking but it is out there. Is this where these Nazis are really trying to go. Get a foothold with the future conditions, through a subtle moral presentation, then move into the gene pool?
This is why the Draft and New Policy I was given is Hate literature and policy.
Have you figured out where the Nazi's are going from your position within society?
What medical condition do you have? What about your kids, you partner, your extended family.
What culture of the hundreds of cultures in Canada are you?
What color are you?
What religion or belief system do you believe in?
What gene history do you have?

My point is, the diabetic policy is based on a “view”, then future medical conditions, and now stolen documents. It is in writing not just something said or dreamed about in the back room or recesses of their minds. They have played this out. It is being slid in the back door, through an Out of Court or Hearing, Human Rights Settlement Agreement. And now, after I really have given the gov't sufficient and the necessary time to re-write a Policy the gov't stole and presented scientific documents to justify the policy.
This was done under the values of Trust, Status, Power, and Prestige of the OSMV, the S G's office, the A Gs office, a private law firm, a Notary and law firm from Alberta, and an academic researcher. Values that we let our guard down to. Values that we just believe guarantee presentations to be complete, where one should not need to question the presentation about such every day legal occurrences such as Copyright Protection, Intellectual Property Rights, and Intent of Use.
However, over the past years I have learned to not Trust the OSMV, its presentations, and its counsel. This is a terrible thing to state about gov't and its presentation, little lone its legal presentations. The Trust has been broken and it has not on my behalf.
So, in a few years when these people go after the woman of Jewish persuasion or Islam or another minority religion, or colour, or culture, the Fascist/Nazi will say the policy comes from the such and such Human Rights case or such and such out of court settlement agreement tied to a Human Rights Complaint. We wrote this policy then and no one complained. Bullshit.
My inquiry and HR complaint is the experiment. I've caught them and Canada needs to stand up to them. The RCMP needs to press charges against the gov't. A Court case with jury to allow these people the opportunity to explain themselves in public.
A Public Inquiry in needed to allow these people the opportunity to explain themselves in Public. A Public Inquiry to inform the next generation of Fascists and Nazis their corruption will not work.
And there are Canadians that will stand up to them.

Back to “Why you need to read this”

Eight, my complaint concerning how I am treated as a diabetic driver has now been escalated to be Multi-Provincial and International in scope, involving Copyright misuse (infractions), Intellectual Property misuse (theft), and Intent of Use (misuse).
The OSMV cannot steal 174 Scientific documents, seven years after my initial inquiry, to justify the policy. They should have put the policy on hold and then reviewed their want, to see if it is a real need, within the influence of the demands of the Charter, the HR Code, and the demands of the Motor Vehicle Act and the Five Points of Engagement I mention below. You then evaluate the consequences of the policy as to the harm. You ask permission to use the science just like the OSMV demands of its own material, done to protect itself from Fascist and Nazis and those twisted folks that have malice in their hearts. You inform the owners of the research of the consequences.

The scientific research was Presented, I was forced to Respond if I wanted to have a presentation in the complaint, and the OSMV Responded to my Response. They are public documents not like one set of documents I have that is listed as “Privileged” or the second Draft listed as “Confidential”. No one is allowed access to them and I cannot present them. It is just another protection device that we all must conform to.
The OSMV demands Copyright, Intellectual Property Rights protection, and Intent of Use from me, the public, but do not respect the world in their demands for protection?
Don't ever forget, diabetics and the disabled have been turned into the Other by gov't, therefore no equal Rights.

Secondly, how is it that a lawyer from a private law firm presented this Scientific research material without Permission Forms? Are we supposed to give up Canadian standards, world wide standards, as exemplified by the OSMV own protection instruments, just because the OSMV presented the research through an academic researcher, a Notary and law firm from Alberta, the Deputy of the OSMV, the private law firm hired by the Attorney General's office, and the A Gs Supervising lawyer?
This is what the charade of the presentation is all about; play the charade through power, status, trust, prestige and position and if caught feign ignorance and have blame on hand for a diversion.
Are we to believe Heenan Blaikie pretends they do not need to make sure the material has Permission Forms?
I don't believe that. No one needs to. What has their lawyer done?
At a minimum there would be 174 Permission pages for Copyright, 174 for Intellectual Property Rights, and 174 for Intent of Use, bringing us to a minimum of 522 pages of Permission Forms. This was forgotten? Bullshit.
(Of course there may be a an owner of research that allows use, but will they allow use after reading what the use is really about and the Harm?)
Where have these people involved in this presentation really taken us?
This is why you need to continue reading.

Nine, another reason you need to read this, you are in the Red to me. That's right. If you are Diabetic or Disabled and drive or care for such you owe me.
Hold it. Hold it. Not so fast with the 'no, not me' stuff. What about your family? The extended family? Now look around at your colleagues, check your Blackberry for names. Be honest, just because no one is looking you are not allowed to fudge. How many do you count?
Why don't you know? You don't know because everyone is afraid to talk about diabetes and disabilities. It gives the enemy ammunition against them. It is just another part of the Fear/Risk factor constructed by those that want to blame societies woes on the minorities, the disabled, those with diseases, and the diabetic.
In 2006-7 the Ministry of Health wrote me that approximately 9% of society is diabetic; 5% when I began my inquiry, 2002.
The Drivers' Medical Examination, DME, costs $124 at the clinic I visit, $75 is paid by government, your taxes. It is done at diagnosis, again at year end, and then every five years after, for a private license; Commercial type 2 license is every 2 yrs, type 1 private or commercial license is yearly.
So, you can see you, your family, or acquaintances owe me. There is debt and I will not take Visa. (Of course you are not allowed to say your taxes are now paying for the DME, so the debt is non existent and I am the liability. That negativism is what the gov't wants you to say and believe. That reversal of accountability is what the gov't wants you to believe. Don't forget, there shouldn't be a policy to begin with, as the policy is not legally justified to begin with. This is just another charade as the phoney future medical condition charade and phoney amendment are.)
So, the only way you can pay the Red off, or to balance the books for yourself, family, and friends, is to Read.
Important; there are no math formula to screw with your mind.
Important; there are no statistics to screw with your mind and justify a result.
Important; only adding, multiplication, division, and a couple of percents to follow. These numbers are from government, not made up from the thin air on my behalf.

Ten, the last reason you need to read this is that I have just experience another horrific consequence of the unjustified policy. Again, this could happen to you, your family, extended family, friends, colleagues, etc, etc. I have spinal problems. I had x-rays taken. A radiologist requested a MRI. This would take four months. If the review of the MRI, by a Radiologist, recommended a consult with a neurosurgeon that would take one year plus and another year plus for an operation if needed. I would need to wait two years plus for an operation. According the Ministry of Health no funds are available for these medical processes or operations at this time. If one is maimed due to the wait that is just too bad. Bullshit.
Funds were found in 2006 to start paying for the DME, which has not been legally justified to begin with, the consequences make enormous demands upon the health system with horrific consequences, and the policy offers no Good. The funds used to pay for this demand by the OSMV should have been used for Good, not their own unjustified greedy demands. The funds came from somewhere for something based upon a demand of hate, not something bona fide or justified and offers Good, not only for the person needing the surgery but for society as well.

My point is, wear my shoes for another moment. Your back has been bothering you for a while. You have had two previous back surgeries, about thirty five years ago. You believe the problem is just the problem you live with, a spine with problems. One night it feels as if someone took an electrical wire from a 110 plug-in and plugged it into your spine. Needless to say you were flipped out of bed and the pain makes you gag, knocks you to your knees, light headed, almost the pass-out stage of pain. Almost the ten in pain. Ten is passing out or a throw-up. (Maybe death by pain is ten, but lets leave that for another day.) As you have learned over the past thirty five years this is again another bad time. Time will be needed for your body to relax, a month at least, maybe two with this electrical storm, maybe a disc is just swollen a bit and will retract. Just like the birthday balloon stretched too far but in time the little stretch mark slowly returns to shape.
A snake position within a recliner chair allows you some quiet time but still with pain, just no flipping around like a fish out of water. Twelve or fifteen Tylenol Three a day. Only the odd twitch but the pain is still there. The worry is not the opiate but the damage to the liver by the Tylenol. Oxycodone has not yet been introduced.
You shuffle to the toilet with the curve of the recliner, your head closer to your waist than the vertical, you balance on the seat as that is your new physical position or you change your diaper. I thought this was to happen when I am eighty and not conscious of it? You have a stool for the shower because you cannot stand long enough for a shower. Your personal health is important, as well as for your social/emotional state, a sponge bath if needed.
You are to be like this for two years as there is no money for spinal operations as the Fascists and Nazis have shuffled tax dollars around to pay for their Hate and control over the diabetic and disabled, solving societies woes.
What is to happen to your body muscles in two years of non-use, little lone the damage to your spinal nerves as they are rubbed raw. Isn't there a medical conditions that makes people twitch and jerk because their own body attacks their nervous system, the sheath around the nerves is worn away, thus the electrical storms? The sheath surrounding the nerve is wore away from the swollen disc on one side and nerve being pushed against the bone on the other side, and the nerves short circuit just like happened to me.
Reader, what would you do? You know the scenario you are to experience as your back has run your life for the past thirty five years. What do you do? Do you pee yourself? Do you once again wear diapers for your bowel movements and urine? Do you cry? Do you scream? Do you say 'why me'? Sure you do. You do all of them and you are still in the recliner waiting, coping, with the nerves wearing raw, and the drugs not doing what they should be doing and in two years of pain relievers you are probably an addict. Something the Fascists and Nazis just hate with a vengeance.
This was my state. What is happening to the hundreds of other people waiting for surgery that cannot afford the funds for private surgery? What is happening to their bodies in the years of wait time? What is happening to their families? What is really happening to the seniors on wait lists? What is happening to their minds? What is happening to these people due to their narcotic pain relief regimen.
All this is happening because some boys in the Solicitor General's office won a Pissing Contest, which let them shuffle funds for a pet project of theirs; keep those needle using diabetics under control as well as all those other disabled drivers that are just killers. (Pissing Contest is described below.)

My point is, “Is this a Crime Against Humanity?”

My point is, “Is this the New Genocide?”

Hold it. Hold it. Remember, you need to Deconstruct everything concerning the S G's office and the OSMV and its supporters for the truth and the scale of the events. You need to view this in its “Wholeness” to really understand the corruption, as well as the “Whole Cost”, not only socially but financially. (Read the updated consequences as well.)
The OSMV demands the Medical system perform the Driver's Medical Examination, DME, and now pay for it.
This new cost upon the Solicitor General's office, or OSMV, comes from my Human Rights Discrimination Complaint as the S G's office now pays for the DME forced upon doctors and diabetics, actually all disabled drivers. This costs the S G's office or the OSMV $5-6 million a year, every year, and it is only going to increase as the diabetic problem becomes epidemic.
So, since July 2006, it is now three full years the OSMV has paid, $15 000 000 has been spent paying for the DME.
As you have just learned the policy has not been justified to begin with and offers no Good. It actually kills people.
This $5 000 000 a year could pay for 600 spinal operations a year. There is a wait list of 650 people just for spinal operations. This means I should have been able to do this within a reasonable time and not be forced to do the MRI and spinal operation privately.
Dr. Day and his colleagues are great to step up to the corruption surrounding government and these matters. The operation took two hours. Therefore, the doctor could do five (5) a day, once a week. The once a week comes from the day the hospital operating rooms are shut down due to lack of funding, because it has been shuffled to the boys who won the Pissing Contest.
Therefore, 5 operations x 52 weeks = 260 spinal operations a year for only one neurosurgeon. How many surgeons are not working due to the corrupt funding allocations for the illegal DME which offers No Good? How many operating rooms are not working due to this shuffle of funds for no Good?
Spinal operations are justified, the intervention can do what it is alleged to be able to do, the consequences are acceptable, there is Good, and we know the client is in agony and things will worsen if intervention is not immediate. These five points of process or understanding are from the Five Points of Engagement below. (Again, the numbers concerning the corruption are given in the 'upgraded consequences' letter.)
The OSMV monitors 50-100 different medical conditions, therefore the cost could be $50-100 000 000 a year.
Think about this. Think about the killing, slaughter, maiming, and pain and suffering? No wonder the OSMV and its supporters stole scientific documents. No wonder there is not a Policy as of yet. If the diabetic policy has not been legally justified, and the consequences never acknowledged, then why should we believe the OSMV has justified any other policy against the disabled? We cannot afford to just believe these government workers are telling the truth concerning anything.

My point is, funds were found in order to pay for an illegal demand upon diabetics with consequences upon the medical system and society that are horrific. And yet, bona fide demands upon medical system are wait listed only adding to the pain and suffering. The tax dollars should go to surgeries such as spinal surgery as there really is Good not for some macho boys in the Motor Vehicle industry that won a pissing contest.
So, the OSMV jeopardizes my health, my life, for no Good reason. It diverts our tax dollars to pay for an examination that does nothing but institutionalize the diabetic as pariah. The funds are used to marry the policy to the Medical Services Plan in order to falsely give the DME a presence of legitimacy. This phoney policy endangered my life and endangers every person on the surgical wait lists.
It is done to protect the gov't from the horrors of the policy, especially now that you know there never has been a policy and they have known about the harm for years. Constructed harm vs believed accidental harm.
You now know why the science was stolen as the Fascist and Nazis only have Greed, Power, and Hate to offer. Fascists and Nazis care nothing for the disabled. Nothing. They are a plague to these people and if they die off or become immobile and cannot drive so much the better for the Fascist or Nazi state of mind; not in my society.
Reader, how else do you explain why the gov't would use our tax dollars for such an unjustified Policy compared to the known Good coming from fulfilling bona fide surgery?
They consciously chose to fund their perverted policy knowing the harm it causes as well as to those waiting for surgery.
This is another reason you need to continue reading.
*********************



Chapter 2

A more complete History of the Diabetic Policy and its Consequences.
Five Points of Engagement
Coroner

A more complete History of the Diabetic Policy and its Consequences.
First of all, there really isn't a Diabetic Drivers Policy, as I have Not received one and I've been asking since 2002.
So, you now know, right from the beginning there is a very real problem; we have all been misled that there is a policy and it has been justified through the demands of the Charter, the HR Code, and the Motor Vehicle Act; the very instruments of our democratic society.

Secondly, the second very real problem is that the OSMV stated that in its “view” it is ok to do the policy, which also means they accept the consequences of their actions. Civil servants do not have views. They do not make policy. They do not do things to me without proof of a real need with documentation for the public to read and evaluate. In other words these civil servants have personalized their want and care nothing for the Charter, the HR Code, and the MVA.
If one tries to sue civil servant for damages, or death through indifference to human life, or endangerment of life it will not happen as they will say they are only doing gov't business. If it is indeed gov't business it should not be based upon some civil servants hateful “view” of the world. The policy must be documented or it is illegal. No documentation to prove a bona fide need and no documentation to prove the harm is acceptable and no documents to prove Good. Sounds like a bullshit policy to me based upon some creepy civil servants view of their believed position in society; above the Charter, the HR Code, and the MVA.
Civil servants serve me and are protected from antagonists by following the demands of the Charter, the HR Code, and the MVA in this case. They haven't done so and now they're trying to hide the illegal policy and its horrific consequences.

Five Points of Engagement
Reader, always remember these next POINTS as they are the points we follow when doing everything, especially Democratic governments, doctors, business, medicine, scientists, social activists, Human Rights, and everyday events.
The very things that the OSMV, therefore the Solicitor General's office, is bound by and have not done.
It is not an accident that they have Not fulfilled these points.
*

Point 1, there must be real need, a bona fide need, a justified need, not a want of some lobby group or personal “view” from some civil servant(s). The Diabetic Drivers Policy has not been justified through the demands of our Constitution, the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, Section 1, and yet the OSMV has presented that they can use the Charter but the OSMV has not offered any documents to fulfill and justify the use of the Charter. (Think about how Corrupt that mind-set is.)
The Human Rights Code, Section 8, also demands gov't demands be bona fide and reasonably justified. “View” is not bona fide or reasonably justified. (Think about how Arrogant and Corrupt that mind-set is).
The Motor Vehicle Act also has demands that forces the gov't to explain itself. The gov't presented statutes 25, 29, and 92, as to why they were doing what they were/are doing.
However, the statutes were presented as paraphrases, by a government lawyer, I believe from the Attorney Generals' office, for the OSMV, as to why the OSMV does this phoney policy. When you read the paraphrases you come to understand the lawyer forgot the most important words, which demand the OSMV prove a need for the wants, for all to read, and then choices can be made as to which way society is to go; yes or no for the policy. Most, if not all, decision making includes Consequences ; how are the horrific consequences of this policy acceptable?
Lawyers do not have the right to mis-paraphrase a statute or law, little lone three statutes. It is so different than the MVA I had read at the Licensing Office and Online I went back to the Licensing Office and reread the policy. I had read the correct policy and the lawyer had left out the most important words, therefore changing the meaning, therefore the understanding. The paraphrasing manipulates the reader to believe the statutes say one thing where in reality they do not.
So, the OSMV changes the wording of the Motor Vehicle Act to get its way. (Think about how Corrupt that mind-set is). It really is slimy, isn't it.
So, right from the beginning the OSMV has mislead and lied about the policy.
RCMP, I know it is just a Human Rights Complaint, but isn't that falsifying legal documents or what? It was the official Response to the Complaint. If the reader accepted the lawyers paraphrasing one would not have lodged a human rights discrimination complaint because you would believed the Superintendent of MV had Carte Blanche to do what she or he wants to do. This is not true. Those that crafted the MVA did so to keep the corrupt civil servants and authoritarians at arms length of their view of how to run the world.
This exemplifies the mind-set or Group-think of the people I am confronting; the written law means nothing to these people.

Point 2, the Drivers' Medical Examination, DME, the intervention has not been proved to be able to do what it is Alleged to be able to do; that is, predict, prevent, and manage hypoglycemia; the phoney reason for the policy. (Think about how Corrupt that mind-set is). An exam that cannot do anything except lie to you that diabetics need medical monitoring and the gov't will do it at all cost. It institutionalizes the diabetic as the Other, the pariah.

Point 3, the Policy is based upon the supposed Consequences of diabetes and its impact on diabetic drivers and yet the gov't is steadfast in refusing to acknowledge the Consequences of its actions; this is called Discrimination. This is one of the bona fide reasons the BC HRT accepted my complaint as something with merit, worth, and value.
The Consequences not only include turning the diabetic into a pariah but is responsible for the Long Wait Times to see a General Practitioner. This leads to the Emergency Facilities Overcrowding, which comes from Long Wait Times, due to the G P filling out useless Forms, therefore their clients go to Emerge. (Emerge doctors report fifty percent, 50%, of Emerge clients should not be there.) This demand on the emerge changes wait times for bona fide emerge needs as well as the overall care for all users. Emerge doctors need Time to observe clients and Time to Think about the problem. Emerge is not twenty-six minutes of acting and then thirty-four minutes of commercials to resolve a medical problem.
There are also changes to ambulatory care and hospital admissions. Emerge admissions are not the same as G P or Specialist admissions.
The consequences are responsible for the recent sanctioning of Private Health Care to deal with the overcrowding in Emerge facilities, which the gov't itself has created, not the public. (Think about how Corrupt that mind-set is).
The gov't sanctions private health care do diminish a problem it has created. (Really creepy stuff, isn't it.)
The Doctors that offered me private health care are not the bad guys here. Again, the hospital surgeries are not funded and closed. I am not the bad guy here because I supported this private health care. I will not be a martyr for those idiots in gov't that say I need to wait for years because of their Greed, lust for power, and disgust of diabetics.
I will not be a martyr for corruption. I will not be a martyr for idiots that say, 'support the universal health care at all cost'. Let those idiots be the martyr, someone lance their spine and let them know what pain is, someone break their leg or arm. Let them wait two years for leg surgery or back surgery and we will see how tough they really are. I wonder if their families would really support them in their time of need? I bet they would be a real piece of work to deal with. Your diapers would only be changed once a day, buddy.
This shuffle of responsibility and accountability is well hidden, isn't it. Doctors and the public are blamed for the overcrowding and too much demand upon the medical system. Those that are making the hidden demands, the gov't, are hidden so they are never in the public picture of Wholeness of the user groups. (Corrupt or what?)
Reader, always remember that the Consequences of the policy, the Policy Harm is a Conscious Constructed Harm compared to the supposed diabetic drivers' Harm, the Accidental driver mishap harm. It is a Conscious harm because the OSMV wrote that it is indeed aware of the Consequences of the policy, that it impacts health care. They did not expand on that fact. They do not offer such statements anymore.
Reader, when I write about the harms such as above the OSMV never responds to this, or the list of Points or the lack of justification. Even if justified, would the OSMV be allowed to consciously harm to the extent the policy does?
We are allowed to consciously harm? I don't think so. (Think about how corrupt that mind-set is).
Conscious harm moves us away from accidental harm to something much worse doesn't it. Does this move an unexplained emerge death to 'death to indifference to human life'? How does this impact the unexpected and unexplained deaths in emerge? How does it impact the maiming of those in emerge. How does it impact those in my new position of now needing to wait two years for justified or bona fide surgery? What about those that die waiting for surgery?
And you wonder why the gov't changed the wording of the MVA, offered an out of court settlement agreement, has not fulfilled the propositions of the settlement agreement, has not renewed the breached settlement agreement, little lone present a Policy. And you wonder why the gov't has just stolen documents to justify the policy. Why it has lied about the scope of the Human Rights complaint, after I caught them presenting stolen goods.
The Consequences that apply to themselves are attended to right away, those to the Others and the pubic, never.

Point 4, the Policy has not been proved to offer any Good. That's right. Nothing has been offered. (Think about how Corrupt that mind-set is). How long has this policy been running? At least since 1999 when I was diagnosed.
Reader, the real problem is that the gov't has not proved a need, therefore it has no standard or benchmark to compare anything to. This is how insane this whole policy is.
Additionally, the science I read, that I base my inquiry and complaint upon, states there is no difference in driver mishaps between the non-diabetic and type 2 driver. NO harm. (These are listed in the 'updated consequences'.)
Compare this to the unexplained and unexpected deaths and maiming in emerge and wait lists, now you know why doctors are calling Press conferences to complain as the harm is out of hand. They have standards or benchmarks that have changed due to more than just the lack of health care funding. They just don't know why, because they are not forced to perform the DME, and do not view the policy in its “wholeness”. Their Good is overshadowed by the unexplained Harm.

Point 5, Really Important, We need to know where we are today to see if we really 'need' to do something.
I visit my doctor 8 times to the 1 time the OSMV forces upon me. (I go every three months for blood and urine testing and renewal of prescription medications) (the DME is every two years for type 2 Commercial driving).
As a private license driver I visit my doctor 20 times to the 1 time the OSMV forces upon me. (Every five years for private license). The OSMV does not inform the public of such. Why not? They purposely hide this from the public. (Think about how Corrupt that mind-set is).
Reader, you will not find these facts in any of the writings the OSMV offers. To do so would break the construction of the “Other”, the social pariah the OSMV and the anti-diabetic lobby has created about the diabetic. (Think about how Corrupt that mind-set is). This is why the “view” is used to justify the policy and its consequences, not Science, not the Charter, not the HR Code, and not the real wording of the Motor Vehicle Act, just our “view”.
I visit the doctor every three months because it is Proactive, I test my blood sugar and urine and then we talk about the results and diabetes.
Secondly, I visit because the medication I use is prescribed, doctor controlled. It is not over the counter medication. It is renewed every three months as the doctor is proactive and responsible for the medical condition he or she monitors and the use of prescribed medications.
Why doesn't the OSMV inform the public of such? Again, because it exemplifies how diabetics do care for themselves, thus society. It debunks the 'Other', the Pariah that the OSMV, the gov't, and the anti-diabetic lobby has created and supports through this unjustified policy. How can such important facts not be acknowledged? Hate? Fear? Loathing? Disgust? Contempt? Bias? Prejudice? Discrimination?
The OSMV and the Fascists and the Nazis really are lying when choosing not to inform you of the above facts.
Reader, the negative, harmful Consequences are why doctors are legislated to complete the DME and Form. The resulting consequences of the DME are in direct violation to their Code of Ethics; they are not allowed to harm clients, little lone turn them into a pariah, which this unjustified anti-diabetic policy does. The legislation supposedly protects them from the harm the DME does to the client, the diabetic, the disabled, and the public. Does it really? What kind of stress does this put on doctors? What kind of stress does this put on me as I have been turned into a Monster, the Other, the pariah, called a killer. That's what this policy states about diabetics, the disabled. Who's the real Monster here?

My point is, there is a Big Idea here, what do you label people that do not fulfill the demands of Democracy, the instruments of Democracy; the Charter, the HR Code, and the MVA? Do not fulfill the Five Points of Engagement?
I don't care if you are Liberal, Conservative, New Democratic Party, the Democratic politics of Quebec, or Green there are rules to follow and grind through. Democracy is tough stuff, it's a real spectacle of life, but worthwhile.
Reader, you label them. They are right of Conservatism, right of authoritarians. Fascist is the word. And right of them are the Nazis. They are dirty words to many aren't they, especially in Canada. Dirty, unless you are doing this to me.
*
The War in Afghanistan is about Democracy not Opium. Over 120 Canadians have lost their lives over there. How many are now disabled? How many disabled are to now be penalized by those that support the ideas that they were fighting against in a far away place? The people that are doing this to me are the same people that send the young to war and hide their own.
The people that I am confronting, and now you are involved with, care nothing for these instruments of Democracy or Democracy. These rules are beyond these people. That is why there needs to be a Public Inquiry into this matter.
Who is the real enemy here? Not me. I'm the one asking very good questions and the gov't does not want to answer. How many people have had their health negatively impacted due to this policy? Me for one, as a diabetic and someone that just needed spinal surgery. Which I have just had. Private surgery due to the Consequences of this DME policy. My inquiry about this policy began in 2002, trying to make the world a better place for diabetics and to make the universal health care better. Ironic isn't it. Seven years of work only to be forced to use Private Health care for my health because of the Corruption in gov't.
Reader, I am not going to be a martyr for anyone, little lone those corrupt persons that have constructed this situation with diabetes and false demands upon the medical services. I was not going to suffer for two years and damage my spinal nerves. I'm not going to be wheel chaired or bedridden due to the corruption in government. I was not going to permanently damage my lower organs due to an unjust two year plus wait for universal health care surgery. Based upon an illegal policy, a pissing contest, and some civil servants “view” of life. Bullshit.
How many people have lost someone, unexplained by emerge doctors, only blamed upon the overcrowding and underfunding in emerge? Television NEWS reports these deaths. It should be easy for the Coroner's Office to document such things; it investigates unexplained deaths. Maybe they won't be officially unexplained anymore.
*
Coroner's Office
Coroner, this is my Formal request for your office or offices to investigate all the unexplained deaths in BC, in at least the Emergency Facilities and Ambulatory care, since at least 2002, when I began my inquiry into the diabetes policy and its consequences and the deaths of those on the waiting lists for surgery.
Since at least July 2006 when funding was found to fund the phoney policy, which in reality should have been used for medical care that is bona fide and offers Good. (Again, the letter of 'updated consequences' works through numbers. No formula or statistics to screw with your mind.)
The surviving families have a right to know about this Illegal Policy and its Consequences. They need to know about the drain upon the medical system and how that Consequence impacted upon them. They have the Right to be informed so they make knowledgeable, intelligent, and reasonable decisions about the unexpected and unexplained death, to help bring conclusion to the unexplained death, if that is really possible.
We have no Right to hide this policy and its consequences.
Coroner, we cannot allow this to turn into another Pig Farm incident, where everyone is in denial just because the people were poor and dead. We have a duty to explain the unexplained deaths no matter who is involved.
It was Indifference that got us there and it is Indifference that has brought us here.
If those that are doing this to me don't like you investigating maybe they shouldn't have been doing it in the first place, solely based upon their “view”. Let them know what their “view” has really done.
************************



Chapter 3
The Diabetic Driver's Medical Examination
Vaginae
Pissing Contest
Patriarchal Society and the Matriarchs
Matriarchal Mommas
More of The Diabetic Driver's Medical Examination

The Diabetic Driver's Medical Examination
I have type 2 diabetes, non-insulin dependent, since 1999, and am forced to take Drivers' Medical Examination, DME, in order to drive. I have no problem with testing for licenses, if they are bona fide, if there is proof of a need, the testing is bona fide, the consequences are not harmful, there is proven Good and we have a starting point.
Reader, the DME is in addition to what is needed if a diabetic is to Commercial or private drive. If you are non-diabetic you would still need to have a DME in order to drive Commercially, the Diabetic DME is in addition to the test.
So, I do the Commercial test, walk out the doctors door, turn around, walk back in, do the DME for diabetes, walk out the door, turn around, walk back in to review my three month tests on my blood sugar and urine, which I had done three or four days before at a clinic. Don't forget, the doctor and I talk about my medications and diabetes, and renew my prescriptions at this time.
Again, the gov't and anti-diabetic lobby never inform the public of these diabetic tests and visits. Why? Why are you misinformed about what the diabetic really does, what their interactions with doctors are?
To not inform you that this really is what the diabetic does is more than accidental. The OSMV and their supporters need to consciously not inform you of such important events. The OSMV lies to you. Fascists and Nazis lie, but you just expect that don't you. So, what do you think about the OSMV and its supporters now?
So, after the diagnosis of type 2 I began reading about this disease. The material I read disproved what was being told to me from government. Something was very wrong here. Gov't says something and modern Science says something opposite. The gov't states there are consequences to diabetes that are negative and need to be addressed. I asked, 'show me the documents that prove this.' No response. I asked, ' you base the policy upon unproven consequences of diabetes but what about the consequences of your actions and the need for them to be addressed.' No response.
I was then lied to when the gov't wrote the policy saves lives. This labels the diabetic as a killer. Another lie.
Reader, always ask this of the gov't, 'What about the consequences of your actions?'

I experienced the DME a few times and realized it was a lie. It cannot do what it is alleged to be able to do; that is, prevent, predict, and manage hypoglycemia, low blood sugar. The very reason for the DME and anti-diabetic policy. So, why is it done? Done to do what to diabetics? Done to influence the non-diabetic world to believe what? Done due to personal views.
Secondly, I also realized the doctor's time should have been and should today be used for children and the medially needy. I realized the policy was phoney with horrific consequences upon not only to the diabetic but society as a whole.
I began asking questions, which have yet to be answered today.
*
Vaginae
For the DME you touch your toes, and finger to nose, how are your eyes, bang the knees with a little rubber tool, let me see your daily log book of your blood sugar. We review that, as there is only one test a day, this depends on me, and what I am doing physically, eating, and stress wise. The same things that impact you and your blood sugar except I prick my finger and the blood tells me how my body is using the sugar. Good stuff. You can do this also. The tools should not be prescription anymore but some places they are still associated with needle use and restricted. (Figure that one out.)
Don't forget, I have my blood work and urine testing done a few days before so the doctor can review my three month average and see if my kidneys are working properly and not being worn out filtering too much sugar.
Now I need to drop my pants. What is that you say. Yes, that is right.
Hold it. Hold it. The diabetic DME is about diabetes and low blood sugar, hypoglycemia, and the prevention, prediction, and management of such.
Why do I need to drop my pants and have my genitals inspected?
For a regular examination one's genitals could be inspected in order to see if one has a hernia, torn muscles, which are needed to make the clutch, brake, and fuel pedal work.
However, in the Diabetic DME the Exam is about low blood sugar. It does not take the place of the Commercial examination. Diabetes is not about my genitals. It is about insulin, my pancreas, and my cellular structure that has problems with accessing blood sugar.
My genitals have nothing to do with low blood sugar. Maybe low blood pressure if I eat a Viagra and have an erection for ten hours. Surely, if this happened one would stop for tea and cookies for such a long event, you know, refuel the blood sugar that has been burnt off, add calories for the work done.
Reader, I can hear the macho boys within the Office of the Superintendent of “Motor Vehicles”, the car guys, the automotive boys, macho boys saying bear with it man, lighten up, show it off, its what we boys do, be a man.
Ya, and that is all bullshit.
I have my body examined, my genitals examined, and my prostate examined. There is real time and place for genital examinations and the examination for diabetes is not it.

Lets change it around here. Lets have a diabetic woman. The wife of one of the macho boys that dreamed up this DME and is calling me wimp. This woman or his wife needs to take her jeans off, take her panties off, get on the doctor's bench, spread her legs, and have a doctor stick her or his hand up her vagina.
And this is testing for what? Low blood sugar?
You macho boys don't use vagina, do yah. Something to do with humanizing or womanizing your women. Oh, ya. You use pussy or something else don't ya buddy.
Hey buddy, are you telling me your wife is not laying there saying to herself, 'What has this got to do with diabetes?' and 'What has it got to do with low blood sugar?'
How's your wife feel? Has she told you? Have you informed her you dreamed up this sexual assault on her?
Lets move to you daughter that is now driving and has just been informed she has diabetes. How about your sixteen year old daughter? You make the picture macho boy.
So, what are you going to do macho boy? How do you now see your women. You macho boys see women as something you own don't you? Are your women dirtied or sullied now? Now that they have had some guys hand up their pussy? How do you feel about your women now buddy boy?
Going to stay with all the other boys that dreamt up this DME and not the gals. Not going to support those unclean diabetic gals are you. You're going to stay with the boys, aren't yah.
Reader, I can guarantee you I do not drop my pants for the DME anymore.

Why is this done? Why are doctors legislated to fulfill the DME?
It is just one of the many ways those doing this to the diabetic denigrate the diabetic in order for them to get their way. Sexual abuse is just another way of denigrating the diabetic so they stay quiet, learn their place, complain and you will not drive. Don't forget I have also been denigrated by the civil service by being written of as a killer.
Reader, the Rights and Privileges you have are not given to the diabetic, the Other, the pariah. It's more than sexual assault, it is an assault upon the persons social/emotional welfare in the public place.
Reader, welcome to the world of diabetes.
RCMP, add this to your list of things to investigate; sexual harassment.
*
Pissing Contest.
What is a pissing contest? It is when a bunch of boys get together and see who can pee the furthest. They do this for something to do. They do this so one can control events because they want to do something but do not have a reason to do it or to justify the doing. So, the longest pee wins and that guy can do what he wants, no reason needed or defined and no consequences attached. Its the boys just doing things. He won. He can do what he pleases for no reason at all.
Does this remind you of the policy? Once again. The demands of the Charter, the HR Code, and the MVA not fulfilled, there is no legal need, intervention is useless, consequences not acknowledged, no Good, and no acknowledgment of what is going on to begin with.
So, the OSMV does this, through the Solicitor Generals office. It won the pissing contest. The looser must have been the Ministry of Health. It's society really. These people care nothing for society.
This explains why the OSMV did not offer any documents during 2002-2004 to justify the policy. This is why it changed the wording of the MVA.
This is why the settlement agreement was broken, a phoney amendment contrived, and not renewed. This is why no Policy has ever been offered. There really is no reason for the policy.
This is why the OSMV stole science and tried to justify the policy through the back door, so that the science would not be within the public space and discovered that it had been stolen. And then they lied about the theft trying to do damage control.
Lastly, gals, or girls, or women I don't care what you have been told by the Patriarchal society we live in, you do not win pissing contests. Period. You may be allowed to play but you will never win.
*
Patriarchal Society and the Matriarchs
Reader, we really are a Patriarchal society. In this instance the gov't is male dominated.. The senior civil service is male dominated. I believe female lawyers are still a minority, especially when it comes to the boardroom and partners.
The glass ceiling is still here.
So, what do we have here?
The first person I come in contact with is Howie, the Deputy Superintendent of Motor Vehicles; female.
Next, the lawyer that presented the changed Motor Vehicle statutes; Lisa Lee, female.
I do not know who her Supervisor is/was but Hunt was the Supervising Counsel for Human Rights in the Attorney General's office during the phoney amendment, so I don't think she showed up out of the blue; female.
I believe it was Hunt that hired Iyer for the first discrimination complaint, definitely the Breached settlement agreement, the Representative Complaint, and the second discrimination complaint; female.
Then there is the academic researcher, Dobbs; female.
Then there is the Notary from Alberta, Fersovich; female. Don't know about the Alberta law firm.
So, we have well trained gals surrounded by boys.
Surrounded by boys that contrived and are playing out an illegal social policy, based upon a pissing contest.
So, we have the Matriarchal Mommas within a Patriarchal place. Interesting, eh.
So, true to fashion in a Patriarchal society we have the Matriarchal Mommas given the task to clean up the pee.
*
Matriarchal Mommas (Gang)
So, what happens to the Matriarchal Mommas now that the strategy has gone multi-provincial and international in scope with stolen documents and the weirdness with the Notary and the law firm from Alberta?
You can hear the boys can't you. Yes, you can. They are all pointing fingers and yelling, “They did it. They did it. The girls did it. We gave them a job and this is what they did. We didn't do it. They did. They did.”
Reader, this is what boys do when they are caught having a pissing contest. The blame always slides to someone else.
Good luck girls.
Were set up as you have set others up? Are you the fall gals or scapegoats as others have been in your charades?
*
Reader, these Matriarchal Mommas have history, they have known each other for years.
I want the RCMP to investigate the people doing this me through the idea of Gang related activities. The Matriarchal Mommas Gang. What are gangs? Gangs are not just bikers. Gangs are not just kids. Or blue collar workers. White collar workers also make gangs. This is not a group just doing things with accidental connections. Gangs do not need fifty members. Five or six can make a gang. It is their behaviour that defines them.
Take a hand full of crows. It is not a group or gang of crows. Crows are called a murder of crows because when five or six of them get together, sometimes they will kill their own kind. For unknown reasons. We anthropomorphize animals, thus a murder of crows, but humans are gangs. We are killing our own kind for What?
According to Mike Knox, “Gangsta in the House”, gang members want security, fellowship, and respect. That is what these people want. Their positions within law and gov't give them the security to do what they want. They believe they are unchallengeable. They get fellowship from their contact and respect comes from each other and the false image that they really are the defenders of society. But in my case they are the problem not the diabetic.

There is also the idea of “being bad enhances the gang member's image. Failure becomes success.”
From the very beginning of my inquiry the gov't has known a real bona fide policy has not been there, little lone any documents to prove the need. Or that the intervention, the DME, can do anything. Or any documents to justify the consequences. Or any documents to prove Good. Or that diabetics do care for themselves, therefore society. It didn't acknowledge the real demands of the instruments of democracy or the five points of engagement.
This is a complete failure to rise to legal standards, as well as social standards, and social contracts. They have gotten away with it, which becomes success in their minds. Failure of basic standards, false success leading to more failed attempts at success. The behaviour has become worse, where theft and lying have become success, only if they get away with it.

“The Big Lies” of gangs according to Knox
Lie 1/3 “The gang will provide protection to the member.” They have been protecting each other by blaming others, using the fall guy or scapegoat as with with the breach. Or the theft of the research, blaming the HRT for the misleading scope of complaint, or using a Notary and law firm from afar to justify their behaviour, 'they guaranteed us' so and so. As if something from afar offers superior credibility and bona fide (ness) above local standards but when challenged the guarantee found only to be non-existent. Or the famous defense, “we didn't really know what we were doing as we were misled by them” and then, again, blaming some one else. Lawyers defending lawyers as they are just doing their clients business. Civil servants just doing gov't business. Hire the researcher as she is then protected by the label of civil servant.
However, will the gang support each other when it comes to a Public Inquiry? Will they protect each other in a Court Case with Judge and Jury coming from my complaint about the stolen research and other things I have experienced concerning this diabetic policy. Will they protect each other if concerned citizens such as Mr. Pabbi and his counsel lodge criminal charges against the gov't? (See Mr. Pabbi in 'who and why you are included'.)

Lie 2/3. “Membership will garner the respect of the community.” As this is/was a human rights case the presentation is one of defending society from the killer; respect for 'taking on the killer'.
The person that must be forced to take a medical examination because the diabetic or disabled will not do it themselves; respect for 'taking on those unclean diseased things'. (Things because they are the Other, not human.)
The feign of mentioning the Charter and MVA as reason for doing what the gang is doing, but all the while knowing their movements are nothing more than charades. Respect gained for mentioning the instruments of democracy but not really fulfilling the demands. Lip service only but who would check, as look at where the lip service is coming from.
Is society, the press, different organizations, and gov't offices I have contacted over the years afraid of questioning the gang because of the gangs position in society, entrenched with the Given values of Trust, Power, Status, and Prestige and the threat of retribution if questioned? So, the gang mistakes fear from society for respect?
Is society afraid to question the gangs behaviour due to the horror of the atrocity of the killing and slaughter? So, the gang mistakes fear for respect again?
So, now the cat is out of the bag so to speak, will reality come back; that “fear repels and respect attracts”.
Reader, you really are attracted to these people? What happens when your partner or child dies in emerge? Will your respect change? Will you give the policy a new read?
Lastly, my position has always been one of approachability, accommodation, and compromise. Has this meant that the gang has mistaken these values or, “kindness, courtesy, and giving the benefit of the doubt as signs of a weak person.” Is this why society, the Charter, the HR Code, and the MVA and I are treated so poorly by these people? We have values that makes us vulnerable, therefore we are there for their use? Easy meat?
Is this what the crows are killing for; culling the weak out. I've never seen the crows eat a kill, they just kill.

Lie 3/3. “The gang will become a family.” They have given each other jobs. Jobs pay the bills. Jobs bring status, which is good for the family. The lawyers protect other members, which has happened.
“Inside a gang, members are constantly trying to achieve a higher status, a greater degree of respect.” Successful cases give the lawyers higher status, leading to promotion, partnership, and gov't Supervisor status. Deputy's move to Superintendents and the academic researcher landed a full time job with government. All within the status of the Attorney General's office, the Solicitor General's office, and a major law firm in Canada. Contriving a nice little family but does the rest of the family really know what is happening? How is a family run on false protection and respect?

RCMP, if I understand the new laws concerning gangs you have the legal right to arrest and detain gang members. Maximum security. Strip searches. Don't forget, white collar workers usually do not tattoo their bodies below certain body lines, as that would show their art work or logos; usually done above knees and elbows. The tattoos must be examined for their real meaning.
Also, many gang members use body piercing today to express themselves and affiliation with others. The strip search will allow the RCMP gang investigation team to examine those private places, all the orifices, and collect the piercing objects. Under magnification the body rings or studs or whatever can be viewed to see if logos are written on them.
Gangs care nothing for the instruments of democracy. They care nothing for the five points of engagement. They care nothing for the consequences of their behaviour. They care nothing for the Good of the community. They will mislead, misrepresent, misinform, make promises and brake them, place blame on others, write the most horrific things about those they hate and pretend it never happened, play charades to get their way, marry their behaviour to social standards in order to deceive and feign accountability, they steal and when caught they lie.
All these things have been done to me by these white collar workers. A gang is a gang no matter what colour the collar. If the behaviour is the behaviour of a gang, it is a gang, you cannot be in denial of it.
Reader, don't forget, the story I'm telling is for you to make “Connections” in order to view the “Wholeness” of what is really happening to me and those involved.
*
Lastly, gangs wear logos and have colours to say we are here. This is us. Beware. Screw with us and we will screw with you.
What is this gangs colour? What is the logo?
The logo is the logo of the 'Attorney General's office' and 'the law firm with seven hundred lawyers criss crossing the country, chapters in every province'. Power is understood by all. If you do not understand this power you really have problems understanding how corruption defends itself.
Secondly, the colors are the colors of the values we, as society, freely give them; status, trust, power, and prestige. They wear these colors in the open, we acknowledge them. All establishing another value, the value of 'position', the position of high power, the untouchables within society; no different than the gangs that kill, maim, threaten, humiliate, and denigrate those they want to control with these values. This is really different that some gangs where the gangs kill and abuse to gain false status, trust, power, prestige, and position. We freely give these sought after values to lawyers, it is a freely given social contract, maybe a legal one, I don't know. Power is understood by all. If you do not understand this power you really have problems understanding how corruption defends itself.
The idea of Law in our society is the power base. We know it and you don't. We are Supervising lawyer for the “Attorney” “General”s office. The top lawyer with inexhaustible financial and lawyer resources. “General” as to war. Screw with us and we will wage war upon you. We will not kill you but wreck your life, you wife's life, and your kids. We will wage war upon your finances. This is what is said to me, and hopefully you understand this also, when they steal documents. Screw with us and there will be retribution.
However, the first play in their charade was to present a lie for the gov't, a lie for damage control. They got away with it too. The HRT did not contest it after I exposed the lie. As of today they have got away with presenting stolen research and a lie about their behaviour and breach of the values mentioned above.
Heenan Blaikie, what does that name say. 700 lawyer, plus staff; big business. A top lawyer for a top law firm with inexhaustible financial and lawyer resources and contacts to government. Screw with us and we will wage war upon you. We will not kill you but wreck your life, you wife's life, and your kids. We will wage war upon your finances. This is what is said to me when their lawyer presented stolen documents. Screw with us and there will be retribution.
When confronted she presented a lie for gov't, over the phone, so there is no written record of the lie. Only that the HRT changed the scope of the Complaint, done to feign ignorance, to play damage control. The charade of using the freely given values of status, trust, power, prestige, and position to get her way.
Heenan Blaikie's presentation is really interesting, it rides around on the laurels of Trudeau and Chretien, the high generals of politics and other top warriors. Their generals are bigger than the A G's general. Interesting stuff, eh.
Heenan Blaikie, what the hell are you doing?

We'll see about retribution as in my world there is only one way to deal with bullies and corruption. Bring a third party to the party. This is why I lodged my Human Rights Complaint. Look where it has gone.
So, when freely given values are what; abused, trashed, smashed, twisted, distorted, or perverted one needs to make it public, so all know. Dirty little secrets in a closed room are not good. Gangs need to be confronted. This is what I did with my emails to the owners of the science that was stolen, the public space. It is what I did when contacting some Consulates as they represent the countries involved, they protect their Intellectual Property as it makes their countries, 'knowledge is power' is the old adage, the public space. That is what I did when I contacted the RCMP about this matter, the public space. This is what I am doing here. Challenging those that endangered my life through the corruption surrounding the diabetic policy.
Connections need to be made to see how we arrived here due to the players and their behaviour. A “Wholeness” understood to make sense of the abuse and corruption. Its all connected and the strategy of those involved is still to do what ever they please as they will never be held accountable.
*
More of The Diabetic Driver's Medical Examination
I began writing the OSMV for the Science that was used to justify the policy. To justify the demand of government coming into my life. I wrote during 2002-2004 and nothing was offered. Just the statement that in its “view” the policy was ok to do.
Wrong. Civil servants nor MLA have a “view” once hired to work in government or voted in to represent their constituency or BC. Policy needs to be proved as 'needed' and the consequences acknowledged and Good realized.
Without documents to justify the policy and its Consequences it is against the law and it is Discrimination.
A senior civil wrote to me that if I really thought the policy was discriminatory I had the right to lodge a complaint with the Human Rights Tribunal. I did so. The HRT accepted my complaint as something worthwhile to listen to, that it had value, and worth, and merit. So much for that gov't condescending attitude. That was 2004. This challenge was from the same guy that wrote the policy saves lives and when challenged himself his boss protected him with words not evidence.
The gang mentality, protection no matter what.

Hold it. Hold it. I'm still here inquiring. Seven years later and the policy is still intact and still killing and maiming.
Killing you ask? Yes indeed. The above senior civil servant also wrote that most importantly the policy saves lives. Really. NO proof was offered. Nothing. Only the personal “view”.
This means the diabetic driver is a killer. Not proved. I can never say this enough.
This means the policy decreases that killing. Not proved.
I wrote his manager, the Solicitor General, and a senior civil servant to the first one wrote that the letter was appropriate.
It is not appropriate. These two men are out of control. But of course the point is to denigrate the diabetic so the Fear seems to justify the policy not Facts. Not facts realized through the demands of the Charter, the HR Code, and the MVA. These two men care nothing for these instruments of democracy or truth.
Reader, this is the most Horrific thing someone can say or write about another person. This is the most Horrific thing a government can state about a group of people or a person.
This means I'm taking your Basic Right to Life away. A fairly important thing wouldn't you say.
The statement has not been retracted. This means this is gov't policy towards diabetics. This means the gov't visualizes, presents, and pronounces the diabetic as a killer.
Bullshit. It is not true. Hate drives such horrific statements, whether coming from someone on the street or the gov't.
These two senior civil servants need to explain themselves in front of a judge, a court case, and the public, within a Public Hearing.

The Mind-Set or Group-Think that supports this kind of denigration of character is corrupt. It defines corruption. This is the Fascist/Nazi behaviour in gov't and their supporters. Maximize the negative image of the diabetic, instill fear of the killer, the killer killing you and your children, therefore forfeiting the demands of the Charter, the HR Code, and the MVA is tolerable because the abomination is so great they need immediate managing. The woes of society will be curtailed. The Nazis start with the disabled and the minorities and when not challenged they become bolder and escalate their behaviour until where we are now with stolen documents and more lies.
*

Because I am approachable, accommodating, and compromising I agreed to an Out of Hearing Settlement Agreement for the HRT discrimination complaint just mentioned. Why not. I want change and change was offered. It is logical and reasonable.
The offer was supposed to change the diabetic policy, which in turn would change how diabetics are treated and perceived by the public, which in turn would also address the horrific consequences of the policy, and better our health care system from the phoney demands upon General Practitioners, Emerge, Ambulatory care, etc, etc .
The out of court settlement, July 2006, saw the OSMV promise a Draft policy on Diabetes, which I could review if I wanted to.
The Draft was late, this means the contract was broken. The Deputy Superintendent of Motor Vehicles, Lisa Howie, the Supervising lawyer for the Attorney Generals office, Catherine Hunt, and a lawyer from Heenan Blaikie, Nitya Iyer, played a charade concerning this breach of contract. They contrived an amendment, played a charade, smokescreen, with a fall guy to justify the breach and pretend an amendment to the breach had been struck.
However, I did not know about this until two months later when I complained to the new Superintendent of Motor Vehicles about the breach and lack of fulfillment to the settlement agreement that the Deputy SMV was managing.
So, these people continued on as if all was/is ok. They still have not offered me an amendment to the breached contract. It has not been resolved. They struck an amendment to a breached contract and never included one of the two principals, me. How insane is that?
How corrupt is the OSMV? What was the legal advice?
What does this say about the lawyers in the Attorney Generals office? This is the second time something more than a simple irregularity has come from that office concerning this complaint. (The first being the paraphrasing of the MVA.)
What is Heenan Blaikie, a private law firm of 700 lawyers, riding around on the laurels of Trudeau and Chretien, therefore the Charter, playing around with this charade? Where am I in all this?
I wasn't even contacted to inform me the OSMV had hired counsel. I believe this is a legal Right I have.
Reader, you need to remember these three players as they will appear again.

Back to the Draft. It finally came. The Draft was so corrupt that I criticized and deconstructed it for all to see; to see what it really is. I did not just Review the Draft as the settlement agreement offered. The Draft is so wrong I took it apart paragraph by paragraph and sometimes sentence by sentence. It really is manipulative, numbers are played with to screw with your mind, to misrepresent diabetes and its impact on society, to misrepresent the numbers of diabetic drivers, to misinform about diabetes, and uses fearful language to manipulate. There is the future medical conditions used to scare people. It uses Fearful language to increase the Fear/Risk Factor, something that certain people believe gives them Carte Blanche to do what ever they “view” as ok to do. Wrong thinking and behaviour. Just more lies about the diabetic.
Lastly, there is no mention that diabetics, such as me, visit the doctor because it is proactive.
No mention that every diabetic prescribed medicine, must visit the doctor to renew the prescriptions..
No mention the DME cannot do what it is alleged to be able to do.
No mention of the horrific consequences of the policy.
No mention of the lack of Good.
No mention that the diabetic visits the doctor 8 - 1 or 20 – 1. Every 3 months compared to a year or every 3 months compared to a visit once every 5 years. That's is right, once every 5 years. Why even go? How insane is that.
No mention that the OSMV has not fulfilled the demands of the Charter, the HR Code, and the MVA.

All in all it is just Bullshit. I didn't call it bullshit then as I was too polite. One just practices tolerance, civility, and politeness and moves along. No one needs to be tolerant or polite to these people now. That is just another tool they use to feign civility. (It is just another tool used by the corrupt to manage those that play by rules.)
Reader, if I did not choose to say something then, to Review the Draft, it doesn't show much commitment to the complaint does it. (The Draft is just another charade played by the gov't as the instruments of democracy and the Five Points were again not addressed in the New Policy.)
**********
I'll call it bullshit now as the policy has just jeopardized my physical health, my life, due to the corruption within gov't and the horrific consequences of the policy, and the shuffle of tax dollars to pay for the DME. Before today I was just fighting discrimination and the degradation of myself, diabetics, and the disabled. Now it includes what I have learned and experienced about the shuffle of tax dollars to justify the DME, all the while deferring real medical needs for years.
The Draft is just noise with nothing Scientific to justify the policy or the Consequences. So, now the OSMV has stolen 174 Scientific documents to justify the policy. Used their position and fear to mislead that they had the legal right to present the science.
The behaviour escalated because no one has taken them to task. One death due to this policy is not acceptable little lone the deaths the emerge doctors are calling Press Conferences for. How many years of death? Ten years now.
**********
Important. Again, the Draft included two or three pages of medical conditions that a diabetic may have express only after having diabetes for ten (10) or fifteen (15) or twenty (20) years. These medical conditions are used to scare the reader, to increase the Fear factor of diabetics. Don't forget, these medical conditions are not dependent upon diabetes to express.
So, the OSMV, the Solicitor Generals office, uses medical conditions that may express in the future to justify a policy against the diabetic or disabled driver today.
How insane is that?
How corrupt is this policy?
How corrupt are the people that wrote the Draft and New Policy?
How corrupt are the people that proofread and presented this Draft and New Policy?
In Canada, it is against the law to penalize someone for what you think they may do or do in the future.
Reader, this was Fascism, but it has now moved to Nazism.
You don't like the word neither do I. Fascists are a very real people and they are in Canada. This is what it is. You better wear my diabetic shoes for a while and really read and experience what these people are really doing behind your backs.
This is what Fascists do. Make things up and slip them into policy and no outsiders really know about it. Then when someone complains they say the policy has been hear since 2006, when it was presented to Jenkins in a Human Rights Complaint. No one complained then and that was years ago.
Fascism is based upon economics as well as politics, the back room deals with hidden agenda. This policy exemplifies these things.

Important. Who offered up the medical conditions mentioned? Who presented them for those idiots that wrote the Draft and then the New Policy that was given to me?
Was it a doctor?
Or, were they just taken from some book or writing about diabetes. Don't forget, diabetes is well researched and the info is out there. It is not esoteric anymore. The new research is available online, that is where I discovered there is no difference in driver mishaps between non-diabetic drivers and type 2 drivers and that even severe hypoglycemia is not problematic.
If it was a doctor, what is this doctor all about?
This doctor has just written that it is ok to penalize diabetics for conditions that may express in the future. What kind of doctor is this? Are we being told this doctor is Not cognizant of what he or she has just written? This doctor would have been paid well for this writing. The doctor accepting the Romans silver. Or was it just done for ego and hate?
If this was a doctor that presented these pages he or she is just simply a Nazi. There are Fascist politics involved here. There are Fascist doctors. There are Nazi doctors. This is one of them.
Is this doctor telling us that he or she is Not cognizant of what he or she has just written and its impact on the future? That her or she is stating that the future medical conditions are guaranteed due to diabetes? The diabetic gene guarantees the conditions will express. This doctor is saying he or she doesn't know that this is what they are stating?
Bullshit.
The Draft and New Policy really are slippery, slimy, perverted documents that are over the edge and people need to read them along with my deconstruction of the first Draft.

Reader, I complained then and I'm complaining now. This policy is very public now and can not be hidden by the Fascists and Nazis in the Solicitor Generals office, the OSMV, those that wrote the Draft and so called New Policy, and those Internals and Externals the SMV refers to when he says he is waiting for information about the policy before he decides on what to do or what they tell him to do. In reality he is deferring responsibility and accountability to those Internals and Externals. And just like those that remain in the dark that wrote the Draft and those that proofread it and sent it on, we don't even know who they are either. And what about those that changed the DME to a medical necessity in order to try an marry the DME to another gov't office to feign legitimacy. And those that shuffled money around to pay for the DME, knowing full well of the surgery wait lists. Back room deals with an agenda or strategy to control for no other reasons than Greed, Power, a Pissing Contest, and a View.
Reader, there are No Names on the Draft or Policy. Who wrote and supported this Fascist/Nazis stuff?

Important; the Deputy of the OSMV blamed the breach of the settlement agreement on a so called team leader that left the group that was writing or constructing or putting the Draft together. Don't forget, there really wasn't a policy to begin with, so something needed to be “Invented”. There is no policy to just tweak and send out.

It begs these questions;
Why is the Deputy blaming some underling and not herself?
Was there really such a person? (After reading the above do you really believe there was such a person? I don't.)
Did that person withdraw because there was no Policy to begin with and was not going to be part of the charade that there had been?
Did that person withdraw due to the corruption of the Draft?
Was that person a secret diabetic?
Was that person a secret disabled person?
Did that person come to realize she or he was working with a handful of Fascists and Nazis and resigned due to repugnance? An underling is certainly not in a position to challenge senior management. You leave or stay and become part of the corruption.
Was this act of quiting an act of civil disobedience? Similar to the doctor I visit, he didn't charge the full amount for the DME? Was this act of quiting like my actions, not bowing to those in power, those given status, trust, power, prestige, and position. Not compromising their belief in values, the very values given to his or her seniors? Quit because they couldn't say anything because of the threat of being fired.
Interesting person this person that quit, if there is such a person.

Reader, who decided to deliver the Draft? What I mean is, some group or persons proofread or reviewed the Draft, as there had not been anything before. This Draft is not just some tweaking of an existing Policy. The idiots that wrote it are not the senior management or are they? If not who put the Draft up as a gov't public policy?
Who proofread the Draft and decided it was appropriate and legal for public presentation?
What kind of idiots are these people? Are they really idiots? Stupid? Ignorant? Not on your life. They are corrupt and defending their corrupt behaviour and the horrific consequences of the policy with fear mongering and lies done in order to justify the policy and its years of horrific consequences.
This Draft is not privileged material. It is public and so is my deconstruction of it. Neither is the so called New Policy private. The second Draft is listed Confidential, so I cannot comment on it and those that wrote and proofread it.

This begs the question;
Who changed the second Draft to be Confidential? Why was it changed to be Confidential?

Those that reviewed the Draft and my criticism still allowed the future medical conditions to be included. Why? Because they are absolutely corrupt.
Are they really informing us that they do not know it is against the law to penalize people for something in the future. This is not the Tom Cruise movie, Minority Report, where police intervention comes from dreamers that dream of future events.
Are they really informing us that they do not know they must fulfill the demands of the Charter, the HR Code, and the MVA when composing and implementing policy? Isn't the Draft and so called New Policy the underpinning that makes the policy bona fide?
Don't forget, I was sent another Draft after the New Policy, which makes the New Policy the Real Policy until the second Draft came. So the first Draft was the underpinning of the New Policy. There are not many changes between the two, the New Policy is mostly a shuffle of paragraphs and headings to make it seem the Policy has been changed after they had read my deconstruction of the Draft; to feign more changes than really done. It is just another charade played out by the OSMV.

Again, the New Policy. Things had been changed and moved around to make it look different than the Draft.
A settlement agreement proposition allowed me to lodge another human rights complaint if the OSMV did not justify the policy. If this New Policy was the policy I had the right to lodge another complaint as it was just noise and bullshit.
However, I was then asked if I would Review another Draft if one materialized. I volunteered to review again. Don't forget I was never sent a policy in the first instance, so this Draft and New Policy really is the Policy. The whole presentation that there is/was an initial policy is corrupt.
I cannot say this enough times, there was no policy, this goes against what we would expect. I should have had an original policy to compare the Draft to. I had nothing. So, here I am reviewing future policy; again I can not justify not reviewing what is offered no matter how much work and how repugnant these people are to me. I cannot afford not to grind through this stuff because if I didn't the Fascists and Nazis would use this as ammunition against me.
The promise of policy is just stonewalling hoping my complaint and I will leave due to attrition and the constant reminder that I taking on the AG office and HB and there will be retribution for informing the public about what is happening.
And the killing and slaughter and maiming in Emerge just continues. The killing and maiming due to the wait list for operations just continues.
Reader, are you confused about the mind-set of the OSMV and anti-diabetic lobby yet. Do you know someone that has died in emerge and it was unexpected and unexplained? Do you know someone on a two year wait list? Don't you now have an obligation to inform them of what you have just learned?

Reader, the OSMV or the Solicitor General's office is not just tweaking an existing policy. Don't fall into that trap the OSMV wants you to believe; that the Draft is from an existing policy. No Policy arrived during my inquiry of 2002-2004 or the HR complaint, 2004-2006. I was guaranteed a Policy in 2006, nothing, then 2007, nothing arrived. Nothing arrived in 2008 so I lodged a new human rights discrimination complaint. The HRT decided I need to wait for the policy, as if the OSMV had not had long enough to write a policy concerning diabetes and other medical conditions the OSMV supposedly monitors.
The HRT is wrong, read the Decision, 2008, Jenkins vs OSMV or Solicitor General's office. They do not acknowledge there was no policy to begin with and the Charter was in 1982. The MVA amended in 1996. Human Rights go back to 1978. The gov't, today the Solicitor General's office or the OSMV has had years to write Policy and to justify the policy and have not done so.
Nothing has come yet, and it is July 2009. I have been at this seven years to the month. The policy should have been put on hold as my inquiry made the Consequences of the Policy public. How many have needlessly died since then? This is why the Coroner needs to investigate these deaths. Unresolved deaths are always there to be investigated.

As the Senior Civil servants wrote then, this policy saves lives. The real statement is “How many lives would have been saved if the policy was put on hold in 2002?” How many saved if the policy was canceled due to lack of Scientific support and harm caused by the policy?”

I lodged the new complaint and the OSMV responded. The OSMV presented 174 Scientific documents to justify the policy.
However, they did not have permission to present the Copyright protected material, protected Intellectual Property material, or the material with Intent of Use protection.
So, what did the OSMV really do here?
They presented stolen material to justify the policy and when caught they lied for damage control.
The stolen material is supposed to justify the shuffle of money to the DME.
Reader, what kind of emerge help and surgery do you expect?
Just another reason for you to keep reading.
********************


Chapter 4
Lies, lies, and more lies
I've just experienced another Consequence of the OSMV drivers Policy, New Corruption
Coroner's Office
BBB stuff. The Bullshit Baffles Brains stuff.


Lies, lies, and more lies
Firstly, there was no policy to begin with. This is the first lie.

Secondly, I challenged the OSMV to prove a need for the policy, I challenged the value and worth of the DME being able to do what it is alleged to be able to do. I challenged the Consequences of the Policy; the conscious constructed harm compared to the accidental harm of the diabetic driver mishap. I asked for the Good. The OSMV never offered anything. This is second lie. It is a lie because you believe all these things would have been fulfilled before gov't made demands upon society, the disabled in this case, the diabetic.
The Charter demands this. The HR Code demands this. The MVA demands this. You and I demand this.

Third, as for the MVA. I lodged the first HR Complaint after the senior civil servant that wrote the denigrating statement that the policy saves lives, in other words diabetics are killers, condescendingly challenging me to do so.
The Human Rights Tribunal has a good web page that informs what it is all about and how to lodge a complaint. Don't forget, the acceptance by the HRT only states the complaint is worthwhile to review. It is not a judgment.
So, what does the OSMV do. The OSMV response was to have a lawyer from the Attorney General's office, her stationary has the same address, paraphrase the pertinent MVA statutes that are supposed to justify the policy.
Again, the paraphrases do not include the most important words of the statutes. When you read the paraphrases you are lead to believe, or come away with an understanding that the SMV has Carte Blanche when it comes to demands upon drivers. This is the lie. The SMV cannot do what he or she 'wants'. There needs to be proof of a real 'need'.
Those cleaver people that crafted the MVA knew of authoritarians, Fascists, and Nazis. The OSMV changed the wording of the MVA do get its way with my complaint. Unbelievable isn't it. What is this called in legal terms? Falsifying documents?
This is the third lie.
This comes from the A G's office. This begs the question, “Was Hunt the Supervising lawyer at this time?” Don't forget she was involved in the breached settlement agreement phoney amendment, smokescreen, and fall guy, with Heenan Blaikie and the Deputy of OSMV. She hired the same Heenan Blaikie lawyer to represent gov't in my Representative complaint, and hired her again for the second Discrimination complaint, who presented the stolen scientific documents to the HRT and me. The same lawyer that presented the lie that the OSMV did know the real scope of the second discrimination complaint. Ya, its the same three actors or players again.
What the Hell is going on here folks?

Fourth, the out of court settlement agreement also saw changes to who pays for the DME. Not only does the type 2 not need to pay anymore but no diabetics pay. Not only that, the OSMV escalated the change to include all Disabled drivers. Diabetics are labeled disabled for driving.
Reader, the DME was previously classified as a Non-Necessary Medical exam, therefore not payed for by Medical Services Plan, our universal health care system. The diabetic or disabled driver needed to pay. So, somehow, to make the offer in the settlement agreement enticing the DME needed to offer something, the DME would be paid for. To do such a thing, the DME was reclassified. It is now a Medical Necessity and our taxes pay for the DME; through the MSP, which is then reimbursed by the Solicitor General's office. Figure this one out.
Hold it. Not so fast with the “I'm not paying for you disabled guys.”
Reader, I didn't demand this change, it was offered so that my complaint would go away. It's a really Good thing for the disabled. However, the policy shouldn't be here in the first instance, and those whiners that say they don't like paying for the disabled should really attack the gov't for not justifying the policy in the first place. Whiners, you are being manipulated by the Fascists and Nazis, you have been set up, the diabetic is the fall guy, you are the sucker. Attack the people that are abusing your medical system abusing your taxes. Of course you won't, as you cannot look at yourself in the first instance.

Important. The MSP does not really pay for the DME. It only looks that way. It pays the fee to the doctor but it is then repaid by the Solicitor General's office. I believe this is how it is done. The shuffle of money.
So, what has happened here. What has medically happened to change the DME to be a medical Necessity? Nothing. This is the fourth lie. Nothing has changed medically to warrant this change. It is an arbitrary change to protect the corruption surrounding the Policy. The change marries the DME to something legal, the MSP, to give it legitimacy. Done to mislead you. I think it was Magic that changed it.
By having the MSP pay the doctor's Fee, or $75 of the fee, the public believes the MSP is paying for the fee, therefore the policy must be legal, bona fide, justified, needed, can do what is alleged to be able to do, the consequences are legal, and there is Good. None of this is true. The use of the MSP sets the public up, to mislead the public that the OSMV demand upon the medical system and the diabetic is bona fide and the fee payment justified.
This change gives the false impression the MSP and the OSMV are married, giving legitimacy to the policy. This is fifth lie.

Interesting slight of hand isn't it. Justification through association. Additionally, how much does this little fiddle of paper work cost us? How many operations could be done for the cost of the civil servants and doctors clerical staff doing this paper work? You need to think on the Wholeness, the grand scale, 100 000 diabetics a year, now add the other 100 or so medical conditions the OSMV says it manages. How many other disabilities' paperwork is handled in such a fashion?

A Point of Interest. About the $75. The cost for the examination at the clinic I visit is $124. The doctor I visit for the DME only charged half of the fee, which cost me $75 at that time. He only charged half the fee at that time because he did not support the policy. Don't forget, he is legislated to fulfill the OSMV demand but the payment is based upon the doctors' needs; legislated because doctors are not allowed to harm clients, therefore, they would not do the DME, therefore they are forced to do the DME. Interesting eh. The OSMV knows doctors will not do the exam as it is unethical, so they force them through the threat of loosing the right to practice. How's that for corruption.
So, this doctor practices Social or Civil Disobedience. That's what this action really is. He's telling the corrupt gov't to get stuffed. My words. He's too polite to say that. I used to be. Not anymore though.
Another proposition of the settlement agreement was that I was to be reimbursed all my DME from 1999-2004, the date of diagnosis of diabetes, the first DME to the HR discrimination complaint of 2004.
So, I guess the idiots that wrote this charade about the fee change decided that if this doctor only charges $75 for a physical examination that is really listed at $150, then that is all we will dole out to the disabled and you doctors can collect more if you want. Make the doctors look like money grubbers, the bad guys. Just like the policy makes the emerge doctors look like the bad guy, due to the unexpected and unexplained deaths and yet it is gov't policy driving this horror.
Reader, how's that for Retribution for Social or Civil Disobedience. Corruption brings out the pettiness in those that are small to begin with, eh. Its great stuff, isn't it. You just have to laugh at this bullshit.

Oh, by the way, as with the paraphrasing of the MVA and my not understand the wrong until it really was too late to complain about I also found myself taking time to understand the scope of the settlement agreement charade and the reimbursement of my fees charade.
The OSMV escalated the DME fee payment to include not only type 2 as myself, but type 1, and all disabled drivers. They did this without informing these people. I just thought all drivers would be reimbursed their fees. Why not, the policy is illegal to begin with. So, if they do not need to pay anymore, why not the reimbursement? The settlement agreement did not say other diabetics or disabled were not to be reimbursed their fees. Of course not, that would be blatant discrimination. How's that for naivety on my part.
Diabetics don't talk about their circumstance. I think if fair to say people do not like to talk about their diseases. People do not like to talk about money. People that are turned into a pariah, such as the diabetic, the killer, don't talk. Just as with a disease and it consequences it is hard to talk about money. So, when I discovered other type 2 had not been reimbursed their fees I asked the SMV why other diabetics and disabled were not reimbursed. Needless to say the letter was not responded to. The HRT Representative Complaint forced the OSMV to respond. Heenan Blaikie was hired again.
The complaint was not heard by the HRT, as it turns out I did not meet the protocol of the 6 months timeline when lodging a complaint from the time of an incident. It is important to acknowledge that I did not loose this complaint. It has merit, value, and worth. It was simply not within the 6 month timeline. That would have cost the gov't $20 000 000.
The sad part of this is that the gov't did not inform the diabetics or disabled about this reimbursement. Why this is discrimination is that the OSMV volunteered to change the DME fee for all disabled and did not involve them in this change, it is just understood by the disabled as windfall benefit, not something from a diabetic that challenged the gov't about the discriminatory and illegal policy. So, the OSMV should have done the same with the reimbursement. Just Another lie.
Why is this another lie? Because the OSMV needed to 'consciously' make a decision not to inform the disabled about the reimbursement. To hide what they had done for one diabetic, only because he had caught them at their crime.
Secondly, the refusal to respond to my letter concerning this matter is just a cover up. They were stonewalling and they won.
Third, the OSMV knows how many times I have undergone the DME, as it has classified and labeled me, and will track me for the rest of my life, therefore they really should have paid all those that have paid for a DME, as the OSMV computer programs now send out the DME Form. The computer system could have managed this reimbursement without any diabetics knowing about it, just as they did not know why they do not need to pay anymore, just another windfall benefit.

My point is, the OSMV has now used our taxes to pay for an unjustified policy against the diabetic.
Let us just work with the diabetic right now, not the other 100 conditions the OSMV supposed manages. This illegal unjustified demand takes resources from our universal health care system; it changes the very basic availability to health care and much more.
Reader, if you divide the $5 670 000 paid out yearly by the OSMV for the DME by the $ 8 700 for the spinal surgery I had, (7 500 for the surgery and 1 200 for the overnight care) we have $5 670 000 / $8 700 = 651 spinal operations.
That is right. 651 spinal operations can be done for the cost of the DME paid out each year. (This is explained in the attachment “updated consequences”, which gives you a “Wholeness” of the policy and its real costs and harms.)
Reader, the list for spinal operations is about 750 and the wait time is two years plus. I was forced not to accept this. I am not going to be a Martyr for the corruption surrounding this policy and the Fascists and Nazis in government doing this to me based upon their “view” that I might be doing something in the future.
Based upon a Pissing Contest between the boys in the civil service and different ministries for Money, Greed, and Power.
So, the funds dispersed to pay for only the diabetic DME, per year, is approximately $5 670 000. In less than two years there would not be a list of people waiting for spinal surgery with change to spare. These people would be back to work. Workers not covered by Compensation, non-insured workers such as homemakers, and the retired would be participating members of society once again. Lives would really be saved. The killing in the Emerge would be gone. The wait list to visit a G P would be lessened. G Ps would be back doctoring not filling out legislated forms that do No Good.
This more than pays for all the spinal surgeries that are waiting to happen. So what happens when we look at the other 100 medical conditions the OMSV supposedly manages and are not justified and there is no proven Good and our taxes are diverted to pay for these DME? The scope of the corruption is Grand isn't it.

My point is, “What happens if the policy is canceled?” We have a vibrant, bona fide, trustworthy, healthy universal health care system again. The problems we are experiencing now with the health care system are gov't driven and not justified. You never hear of the gov't demands upon the health care system, it is always the Public that is labeled as demanding to much and presented as the Problem.
Reader, you have just come to understand the gov't and its Bias, Prejudice, Hate, Ignorance, Disgust, Fear and Loathing, lack of responsibility and accountability, and breach of Trust. Done for Greed, Money and Power. It is not only endangering the health system but putting the public in harms way for no Good reason. It just jeopardized my health, my life, for what? A Pissing Contest.
As for trustworthiness, do you trust you will get good care in the Emerge? Do you worry about the Overcrowding, the underfunding, the super-bugs that have evolved in the hospital setting, the H1N1 virus and other viruses, colds and bacteria and other diseases , tired doctors and staff due to underfunding and the stress of overcrowding, while you wait 10 or more hours for doctor care due to the Consequences of the OSMV diabetic or disabled unjustified policy?
You bet you do. If you don't, why don't you? You cannot be that naïve.
Just wait until you have a decision to make like I did when the incision from the spinal surgery I just had became infected. It is a 5-7 day wait at the clinic to see the family doctor. The emerge is the above.
I went to the clinic and only waited two hours for a doctor as someone always cancels; some go to emerge as their conditioned has worsened due to the 5-7 day wait to see one's doctor.
The incision was reviewed and antibiotics were prescribed. It is difficult sitting here writing I can tell ya. But I am not going to let the Fascist and Nazi bastards win due to a spinal operation and infection. These people are like a virus that needs to be held in isolation until proper protocol can be thought of, in how to treat the infection. They are like flesh eating disease, they need to be cut off the body for the health of the body.
The clinic is a less harmful place to be and the clinic always has someone cancel for whatever reason or one just waits until five o'clock for the walk-in-clinic to begin. It's safer than emerge, laying in a hallway or newly designated broom closet as a emerge room, or beside a corpse because the emerge is understaffed due to the overcrowding, sitting beside you and your nasty infection and me with an open infected incision on my spine. I'm going to emerge for some twisted sick civil servants and their hate of diabetics and the disabled and lust for Power? The boys and their Pissing Contest. Reader, you go.
The thinking and evaluation that I needed to go through for this infected incision is absolutely wrong. I should have been able to go the the emerge and get care within a reasonable time, within a safe environment, and I could not. I should not need to worry about the above when thinking about going the emerge. I should not have needed to evaluate the spectacle of the unexpected and unexplained death of my self, due to emerge overcrowding.
Reader, would you, with an open wound on your spine, that is infected already, go to emerge if you did not need to? No you wouldn't. You would not put yourself in harms way.
This reality should not have happened. It should have stayed as an scenario of what will happen if the gov't does not acknowledge, fund, and manage its demands upon the medical system. A scenario of what will happen if we do not stand up to the boys having a pissing contest. Well, it has happened. The policy endangered my life a second time. The first being the unjustified wait time for surgery.
Reader, time for another review. This means there are funds for medical care, as funds were given to the OSMV, for an unjustified demand upon the medical system, used to pay for a medical examination that has not been justified, that has not been proved as capable of anything, with horrific consequences, and no Good. So, Money is available to pay for a phoney medical exam, that negatively impacts our health care system, clients, and society.
On the other hand these funds should be used for something useful and positive within the medical system; not just a drain on the financial reserves and medical reserves, the medical human resources; doctors and staff. Something useful such as my spinal surgery that is proved to be needed, the medical examinations can do what they are alleged to be able to do, the consequences of the intervention are sound and bona fide, are not horrific, and there is Good.
So, why is the diabetic DME still being done? Greed, Power, and Hate are never satiated.

My point is, once corruption goes so far it cannot be reversed or stopped. It just get worse, more sticky, more encompassing, out of control.

My point is, the funds, our taxes, used for this demand upon the medical system has not even been proved to be needed little lone offer any Good. It is just more Money and Power for those in the car industry; don't forget this is for the Office of the Superintendent of “Motor Vehicles” and all their supporters. Those boys with too much testosterone in their bodies and believe they are sexual Tyrannosaurs.
Again, just for diabetes it is approximately 5 million every year. There are about 100 different conditions supposedly monitored by the OSMV and its followers. At only 1 million a medical condition it is 50-100 million?
The equivalent to 36 doctors taken out of the system just for diabetes. How many for the 100 medical conditions supposedly monitored? 800-1000 doctors, General Practitioners? 20%-25% of G Ps are filling out useless Forms for an illegal medical examination. Then add all the other Ministries and gov't Organizations that make demands upon the health system. Have they really proved a need? Are the people already visiting a doctor as with diabetics?
This is more than just Bullshit. This is why there needs to be a Public Inquiry, a Court case with Jury.
*
I've just experienced another Consequence of the OSMV drivers Policy, New Corruption

Reader, bear with me as Context is needed to see the real world, the Wholeness.
I know I repeat a lot but if I had put this in Point Form would you have believed it?

My point is, the Consequences of the policy have reached a new level of depravity. I've just experienced another Consequence of the unjustified policy and it is rotten to the core.

So, funds are available for this unjustified medical demand upon the medical system, but not for legitimate medical needs upon the medical system, such as my May 22, 2009 spinal surgery and MRI.
Funds are not available for what has just happened to me but given to the OSMV for unjustified medical use.

My back has been bothering me for some time. Just lately it drove me to visit a doctor. X-rays were done immediately as we are using the new tools of medicine, the CT scan and MRI, thus leaving the x-ray dept open for drop-in use. The x-rays were read immediately and the recommendation from the Radiologist was for a MRI. The Nanaimo Hospital took three weeks to send me a letter to inform me I needed to wait four months for a MRI. The demand for the MRI was faxed from the medical clinic to the hospital the morning I visited the G P about the X-ray findings, when the G P requisitioned the MRI.
The letter to me from the hospital only took two days by Canada Post. This means it took nineteen days to write my name on the list of those waiting for the MRI services. I was seeing a G P every week for spinal problem and he phoned each week to ask why I had not been contacted.
Something is wrong here. This is completely unacceptable.
Is this due to the underfunding? Understaffing? And yet, funds are available to the OSMV illegal policy and funds to pay for the shuffle of the paperwork for the DME from the doctor to the MSP and then to the S G's office.
And yet, funds are not available to the medical services to run everyday events, real medical demands with Goodness.

Secondly, the letter informing me about the MRI contained material about the MRI and diabetes and what to do and not do. The paper work concerning diabetes and MRI is meaningless for my needs. This told me the person sending the letter has no idea of what is going on. Have they been trained? Do they even know what diabetes is? If the government forgoes the demands of the Charter, the HR Code, and the MVA because diabetes is so dangerous, then why hasn't this person be trained about the horrific disease diabetes and those that have it?
If the government changes statutes, breaks settlement agreements, and steal research to manage these disease ridden people then why hasn't this person been trained about diabetes and its needs?
Wrong information about medical procedures is very disturbing. I understood this as just more of the ignorance, bias, prejudice, and fear and loathing, and disgust concerning diabetes.
Are the people running and working in this department drunk or stoned? Are they copulating in the closet, as we are led to believe the Ferry workers were, that crashed the BC Ferries ship on the rocks and people died?
Are they even on the job or just wondering around the hospital? Have they really been trained? Do they know they are not handling fish? I'm diabetic but still Human, whether the Fascists and Nazis like it or not?
Ministry of Health Services, Nanaimo General Hospital, CUPE, VIHA this is not acceptable. The dislike and hatred between you folks is not good enough; you jeopardized my health. My health is more important than the distrust and disgust you folks show for each other.
Who the heck do you people think you are. I come first. What a weird world that would be, eh.
If you want to hate someone Hate the people that are doing the above to me and you. Stand up to them for your health, your business' and your jobs, and the people that trust you for their health. The people that are doing this to me and taking your funding and human resources away from you are not going to hate you less for confronting them. The contempt they now treat you with is not going to be any more harmful. These people are your enemies, as they create the problems and defer the problems to you. You are their scapegoat. Just like the fall guys and scapegoats that have materialized in my complaints.
Stand up to the monsters I am fighting, that are abusing you, and ruining our health care system, and making your work place a social/emotional nightmare for some.

Whether you like it or not I've already paid for the services offered by the hospital and the staff concerning this bizarre letter. My taxes give them a job. Your taxes give them a job. Are they really the problem or is the policy the real problem, only a few steps away, a few degrees of separation, so we do not really see the true problem making hidden demands?
In reality they will, are being used, as the scapegoat for the policy. People like me are supposed to say what I just wrote and yet the real problem is the boys and their pissing contest and the policy. Corruption always has blame at hand.
This is why the VIHA, Nanaimo Hospital, the Health Ministry, and the Union(s) are getting a copy of my complaint. You are all intimately involved in this whether you can accept this or not. The corruption associated with what is happening to me is really deep within society and I don't have to be a Good little Canadian and be tolerant of it. Neither do you.
What is going on is corrupt and if you are not corrupt, then you need to fight it.
Reader, “When do you stand up to corruption?” After your parents or kids die in emerge and the doctors look at you and say they are sorry but the underfunding and overcrowding are responsible for the lack of care and the unexpected and unexplained death. It will be much to late if you chose to be quiet now. You will live with this for the rest of your life because you chose not to stand up today.
You cannot bury your head in the dirt like the Solicitor General's office, the OSMV, and the Attorney General's office, and the civil service and pretend wrong is not happening.

So, the funds diverted to the OSMV to run this phoney medical examination takes bona fide, legitimate funding away from all of you and me. The use of our taxes for this illegal medical policy attacks the Medical system through the back door. Back door programs are not acknowledged, funded, therefore not managed, therefore the medical resources, not just funding but the human resources as well are lost or disappear; the G P are the easiest resource to question, “Where they have gone?”
The resources disappear and we wonder where they went. Now you know. Back door and illegitimate demands are detrimental to all those bona fide demands that are talked about and evaluated in public space, therefore acknowledged, justly funded, therefore managed.

I'm sure each of you will say, VIHA, Nanaimo Hospital, the Health Ministry, and the Union , “We are underfunded, therefore understaffed and undertrained for the real needs.” I don't doubt it.
Reader, you need to read this and the “updated consequences” to see how you, therefore the whole of society, are being screwed by the S G's office and the OSMV and this phoney illegal drivers' policy. Those that have died in emerge, listed as unexplained, are not unexplained now.
As the health care business you have a duty to inform the survivors of such events, of what you now know. Give them a copy of this letter and the 'updated consequences'. They have a Right to know. The survivors have a Right to make decisions about the death of a partner, child, or parent with as much information as can be given to them.
You folks need to stop being the scapegoat for something that is not your fault. You need to stop being the Apologist.

My point is, now you know where the money has gone. The big idea; it has gone to support the corrupt automobile industry. The OSMV is just part of that industry. People riding around on too much testosterone. People that are out of control and actually believe they are some kind of sexual Tyrannosaur and can do what they please without consequences. These people are extinct and don't even know it.
You have to let these people know that you are going to fight them. These people care nothing for morals or ethics, so forget that plan of attack. They know the Health industry is supposed to be bound by ethics, so you are at a disadvantage if you play around with ethics or morals, as the people doing this me are not.
You need to inform the public, through the Press, and a Public Inquiry about what these people are doing. You should be tired of being the scapegoat for the corruption concern this. You need to 'make public' how the policy is not justified by the Charter, the HR Code, and the MVA. Inform the public about the harm of the policy. How the policy has continued on since 2002 when I first questioned the policy and its Consequences. The unexplained deaths and maiming of clients in Emerge need to be brought forward. The Coroners office needs to investigate and list all unexplained deaths from at least 2002. And now, all the unexplained and unexpected deaths of those on the wait list for surgery need to be investigated.
“Back to the 'four month wait' for a MRI”
Reader, I was informed that a company in Courtney offers MRI. I phoned on the day I received the letter from the hospital informing me I had a four month wait. The Comox Valley MRI booked me for the following Friday, $875.00. They were great to work with as they want my business, they want to work, and they need the work. The MRI was done Friday and read by a Radiologist on Sunday. The Radiologists report was mailed and received the following Tuesday, in time for my weekly visit to the doctor. The Radiologist's recommendation was for me to contact a neurosurgeon. In other words get an operation as soon as possible as this is your spine, your electrical system, the thing that runs your body. The thing that runs the lower half of your body, the internal organs. There are very real problems that need to be attended to immediately.
The doctor that I visit referred me to a neurosurgeon in Victoria. The “specialist” clerical worker in the doctor's clinic informed me that I would need to wait for a year plus for a consult with a neurosurgeon. Then, if the doctor thought intervention would be appropriate it would be an other year plus.
Hold it. Hold it. My body is already short circuiting and flipping me around like a fish out of water. I sleep in a recliner chair that can be angled to stop the pain and errant electrical pulses. When I stand my head is almost closer to my waist than the vertical. And I have just been informed that this spinal problem affects the nerves that manage my plumbing and other lower organs and if I don't do something quickly I will loose the control over these organs. Loss of control of these organs shortens one's life. Loss of these organs shortens one's life especially when one has diabetes which can inhibit one's ability to repair and heal.
This is real serious stuff. And Fascists and Nazis are going to jeopardize my personal health due to their pissing contest?
I don't think so.
I'm supposed to wait for two years plus for an operation that the government restricts because it says it only has funds for so many spinal operations. This is a completely arbitrary decision, as it found funds for the policy. Did it take funds away from the Ministry of Health to do this as it is a demand upon that ministry?
Minister of Health, did your money go to the S Gs office and the OSMV to run this phoney drivers examination as it is a demand upon the health system?
Minister, I am tired of the Fascists and Nazis in government corrupting the medical system for their wants. Your office is used as the scapegoat for the problems within the health sector, where in reality the S Gs office, the OSMV, and their supporters are responsible for this mess.
Where did the money come from to pay for this demand upon the health system?
How did this illegal demand become a medical necessity?
How can a new “medical necessity” have no Good? (How corrupt is that? Figure that one out? How insane are these people?)
How can this be a demand upon your ministry and your office not challenge it?
You challenge it legally, not through a pissing contest with some very silly boys. You make this public.
(Again, the updated consequences explain the real demands, the Wholeness, and how corrupt they really are.)

Important, this begs the question, “How many other Ministry's or gov't offices make demands upon the medical system and do not inform the public about such?”
How many doctors are really just filling out Forms for gov't? Demands like the DME, which are not legally justified. Demands based solely upon some civil servants “view” that it is needed.
If it is not public, and through the back door such as the drivers' policy is, then it is not funded correctly, nor managed, and the consequences upon the medical system are not known, therefore not managed.
Minister, what is happening with this phoney driver's policy is corrupt and a Public Inquiry needs to be done, so all the problems you now have can be explained in public. Done to let BC and the world know that our universal health care system does work. It is only failing now due to the corrupt demands of gov't, which are not acknowledged, funded, and managed; in other words they are hidden. Hidden by civil servants not by elected officials. Or is it?
My point is, my request for a medical consult and operation is a bona fide, real, justified medical need. It really is a medical necessity. Not some want as the demand of the OSMV illegal, unjustified, phoney diabetic policy is. Not some medical procedure that cannot do what it is alleged to be able to do. Not something with horrific consequences. Not something that has no Good.
(Again, the attachment “upgraded consequences” expands on this discriminatory demand of the OSMV and the impact on operations and MRI.)
Reader, four months for a MRI and two years plus for surgery for a spinal problem is just insane. So, I called the Specialist Referral Clinic in Vancouver. That's right the private health care service that has been sanctioned to provide health care to deal with the constructed shortcomings of the medical system; to deal with overloads in emerge, ambulatory care, doctor shortages, and under funding for operations caused by the diversion of tax dollars to support the illegal, unjustified demands of the S G's office and the OSMV.
The OSMV and the corruption within the office has no Right to jeopardize my health due to their hate of diabetics or the disabled or their Greed for money or power or a turf war over other ministries.

My point is, Hold it. Hold it. The government has created the problem of Overcrowding, not the public.
So, now the government uses private health care to deal with the problems of overcrowding, ambulatory care, doctor shortages, and the underfunding for operations, a problem it has itself created but puts the blame on the public. Slippery and slimy behaviour isn't it.
Reader, take the time to work through the “upgraded consequences” for your self, as well as well as your organization or political riding you represent. They are only numbers to follow, you only need to be able to follow the addition, subtraction, division, and a few percent changes to numbers.
Again, there are no formula to screw with your mind. There are no statistics to screw with your mind.
Just a couple of numbers and they come from government.
I have not manipulated the numbers to manipulate you. This is not like the Draft where manipulation is part of the presentation and if you do not take the time to convert percentages and challenge the arithmetic you will be manipulated and misled. It is intentional. There is intent to deceive.
“Back to private health care”
The clerical worker at Specialist Referral Clinic booked us for a consult, within the week. We faxed my medical history to them. A copy of the MRI, in CD form, was delivered to the Specialist Referral Clinic. We arrived and had a consult with a neurosurgeon. He again explained my condition and the horrific consequences to come, that were already starting to appear.
The neurosurgeon is the Chief of Surgery in Lions Gate Hospital. His operating rooms and medical teams are not funded to work full time. He offers medical care to the public and me within the SRC setting.
So, they practice their profession else where, and I have to pay. It was $7 520.00 for the operation and $1 050.00 for the overnight stay. I was operated on Friday, May 22, at 8:00 AM. It was a two hour operation and I was walking at 3:00. I left the Surgery Centre at 8:00 Saturday morning.
I'm fine. It is difficult to sit here and write. It has taken me days to write this. But my spine is fine, my lower organs are fine. Now the affected nerves and muscles need time to hopefully repair. The surgery pain is fading and the four cm incision is healing. It has taken so long to write this the infection has come and gone.

My point is, this was all done in less time than it took for Nanaimo Hospital to send me the letter that informed me I would need to wait four months for a MRI.
All those involved in the hospital letter should be outraged over this, as it could not be run any worse. You need to challenge the gov't as to its priorities, personal demands, its legal responsibilities. The lack of funding for this hospital dept jeopardized my health. They endangered my life. For what. A bunch of macho boys having a pissing contest?
The whole phoney policy and the consequences is just Reckless Endangerment to all those that need health care.
All those involved in misdirecting funds to fund the phoney DME should be fired, as they are the problem, not the staff in the hospital or the medical system.

My point is, the Ministry of Health Services, Nanaimo General Hospital, CUPE, VIHA, and the public are blamed for the problems within the system and now you know you are not the real problem. It is the unjustified demands of the S G's office for money and power and the unjustified and phoney policy of the OSMV that is causing havoc with the health care system and killing the unaware in emerge and has just endangered my life.

My point is, the other night on BC CTV, June 3, 2009, eleven thirty NEWS, there was an article about a Victoria person needing an MRI for her knee. The appointment is for March 20, 2010. The TV sound bite informed viewers that the M of H has only so much money to give to each Health Area. It seems there was a one time grant to decrease the wait times for MRI. But here we are again, a year later with unexplained wait times and underfunding.
Hold it. Lets again, review the real numbers concerned with this. The OSMV diabetic drivers medical examination yearly costs are;
75 600 diabetics forced to take the DME x $75.00 for the DME = $5 670 000. That is yearly. Every year this money goes out to pay for this corrupt, illegal, illegitimate, unproven demand upon diabetics and the health care system that has not even been studied to prove any Good.
This is for just diabetes.
How many MRI could be done with this money? How many private MRI scans could be paid for by these funds, the service bought so the health care system does not need to wait five years for equipment and trained staff?
The OSMV supposedly manages about 100 conditions. What is the real financial cost of the policy? $50 - $100 000 000?
How many MRI could be bought with these funds?
This diversion of funds for the OSMV DME pays for all the surgeries in waiting and all the MRI, with cash left over.
Reader, never forget, I visit the doctor 8-1 or 20-1 already, compared to the mandatory forced visit I must endure for the OSMV, so there is no real need for me to visit him or her again just for the Fascists and Nazis doing this.
Reader, are we to believe that if you have one of these medical conditions the OSMV supposedly manages you will not be visiting a doctor for health care other than the mandatory visit demanded every five years?
Of course not. It is just more contrived denigrating propaganda from the OSMV concerning people with disabilities. That they do not take care of themselves and need some Fascists and Nazis to manage their lives and health. It's just more Bullshit.
The people doing this want want you to be dumb and just believe their presentation as truthful, coming from an unquestionable source, from the powers on high; those given status, trust, power, prestige, and position.
Not so. I demand my Charter rights, my HR Code rights, and my MVA rights to govern me, not some civil servants' view and a pissing contest.
The OSMV never mentions this fact of client/doctor care. They pretend that drivers with medical conditions never manage their health, therefore the gov't must run by phoney corrupt DME, no matter what the cost to Democracy or how many people the policy kills and maims.

What is the real human harm caused by the policy? How many people have died in Emerge? How many have been maimed? How many people with medical problems have been maimed or died due to the two year plus wait that could have been avoided if the funds for the OSMV had been used for bona fide health care demands.
Coroner, how many of these killings are explained now that you know the cause?
*
Coroner's Office Again
Now that you have been introduced to the killing and slaughter you can see my request is valid. It has worth, merit, and value. Unexplained deaths haunt the survivors for the rest of their lives, especially when one goes to an emerge facility and ends up dead. One explained 'unexplained' death will be worth the investigation, both financially and socially/emotionally. All the survivors of unexplained deaths need to be informed of what you are about to do. The public needs to become involved in this as the OSMV has has at least seven years to prove its wants and justify the consequences and it hasn't. It has continued with the policy knowing the horrific consequences since my initial inquiry of 2002.
Coroner the people that have died in emerge are just road kill to those that are doing this to me. They are not road kill. They were people with families and history. They died through Indifference to Human Life. The health care system is not responsible for the deaths; the sickness, greed, corruption of those doing this to me are responsible. They need to be held accountable. Your inquiry and a Public Inquiry will force change because it is evident those doing this cannot change, their behaviour has worsened.

However, there is problem. The online program states the Coroner's office is part of the Solicitor General's office.
This invites huge problems. Can the Coroner's Office really investigate the S G's office and the OSMV with complete freedom, independence? Are you as brave as I am to take this corruption on?
After what has happened to me and is still happening to me will certainly make all the other readers of this complaint wonder about conflict of interest. Is it really there?
I think this is going to be worse than the Pig Farm, as this policy has been going on, at least since my diagnosis in 1999 or from my initial inquiry of 2002-2004.
The survivors of those emerge unexplained deaths have the Right to have you investigate.
It doesn't matter how ugly it gets, it is not as ugly as it is now, with government changing statutes to get its way. Breaching the settlement agreement and contriving a phoney amendment, and just recently stealing research to justify the policy, therefore the killing, slaughter, and maiming. And now those that are surgery wait listed for no bona fide reason.

Questions for the Coroner's Office to Answer
Question; again, this is my Formal Request for an investigation into this matter. Due to the S G's office and the OSMV not responding to some of my correspondence, questions within other correspondence, and only responding after being forced to by the HRT to the Representative complaint, I need your office to acknowledge that you do you understand and recognize that I have asked for an investigation into the unexplained deaths in emerge facilities?
Q; If you will not be allowed to do you duties will you resign in protest?
Q; will you demand a Public Inquiry?
Q; If you are not allowed to investigate will you demand a Public Inquiry before you leave office?
So, where do we go from here Coroner?

My point is, Coroner you don't owe anything to the civil servants doing this to me or the internals and externals the SMV makes reference to when he states he is waiting for their input before he does something. They owe you an explanation about their behaviour. You work for the public. You work for the survivors. You work for those that are dead and would like their untimely deaths explained. You work for ghosts.
Coroner, you need to press for a Public Inquiry.
Coroner, don't you get tired of being the fall guy, the scapegoat, the smokescreen for the problems with the health care system that the Solicitor Generals office, the OSMV, and unknowns have created? How many unexpected and unexplained death Forms have you filled out that have a “cause of death” as “unknown”? Now you could write known?
It is time to stand up to the S G office, the A G office, the OSMV, the car industry and its supporters, those that wrote the Draft, those Internals and Externals that support the policy, and the corruption.
*

Reader, we need to review again to bring Context and Wholeness to this new charade.
I should inform you that when I did not receive the diabetic policy within a reasonable time I lodged another HRT complaint, as that option is part of the settlement agreement. This is mentioned above. What happened in that complaint defines corruption in government and public life. The first HR complaint was canceled or withdrawn because the OSMV offered change to the diabetic policy, which in reality was never there. The fee payment scheme was changed, which again feigns legitimacy. These were carrots offered to make the HR Discrimination complaint go away. I accepted. Why not?
So, the OSMV broke the settlement agreement and contrived a phoney amendment, with a charade, smokescreen, and fall guy pretending the breach had been amended and all is well. Not so. They didn't even inform me of this charade. Of course not, it wouldn't be a charade hiding something would it.
Don't forget, I only discovered it two months after the deed was played out. The actors were the senior lawyer for the Attorney General's office, a Human Rights lawyer from Heenan Blaikie, the same lawyer that presented the settlement agreement, and the Deputy Superintendent of Motor Vehicles. The Draft finally came. Late but there. No need for me to review the Draft, New Policy, then anther Draft. The Representative Complaint.
Months, leading into years went by without a Policy. Don't forget it is supposed to be based upon an existing Policy.
The settlement allows me to lodge another complaint if the policy is not justified.
The Draft and New Policy offer nothing to justify the policy therefore the horrific consequences and lack of Good.
Therefore, I lodged a new Discrimination Complaint. It was accepted to be heard. The OSMV responded to the complaint. A hearing date to be set. The early Dismiss asked for by the OSMV and given.

Big Question: what is the OSMV going to offer me to go away this time? So, there is no legal record of the discrimination complaint for you to read, like the first complaint? So, the public does not learn of the illegal policy and its consequences.
Don't forget, the complaint, if before a Hearing, will be written up by the HRT member and placed online for the world to read.
Do you really believe these people doing this to me want this? It wouldn't matter if I won the discrimination complaint or not, the HRT would write about all the facts presented. Interesting stuff, eh. This is why the demand for an early Dismiss. It is not public where you and I are very public and in the OSMV face. The Dismiss is written material only.

My point is, what do they have as an offer for me to go away this time?
So, what do they have to offer with this second complaint to make it go away before it is very public, where the Press could visit, diabetics could visit, disabled could visit, etc, etc?
Nothing.
No fee change. No reimbursement. No promise of a Policy. No damages payment. Nothing.
So, there is a real need to offer a bona fide policy, proof of a need, proof the DME can do what it is alleged to be able to do, bona fide justification of the Consequences of the policy, (how are they going to justify the killing and slaughter and maiming in Emerge due to Overcrowding, due to doctor shortages caused by the OSMV drivers policy when people like me are visiting doctors 8 times to the 1 visit mandated by the OSMV), and proof the policy does Good.
This is beyond these people as they have already put themselves above the Charter, the HR Code, and the MVA.
So, how could they now legally justify the policy? Its consequences? Its lack of Good?
As with the Representative complaint they are legally being forced to respond. What is to be legally offered?
Nothing. They didn't.
They presented 174 Scientific documents to justify the policy. Articles from the who's who in Scientific Journals. The trouble is there was no Permission Forms for Copyright, Intellectual Property Rights, or Intent of Use. This means the OSMV stole these protected articles or protected documents. This means the lawyers presented stolen documents.
Go to the OSMV web page and you will see it protects all its information and wants to know the Intent of Use. Forms are provided.

Reader, how was I going to confront this challenge? I only had a month to respond to the presentation of the OSMV; this included the 174 stolen research documents within a paper by the academic researcher just hired by the OSMV to write or put together policy papers for the OSMV, her presentation is about 48 pages. I don't know if she wrote the Draft, the New Policy, and the second Draft I criticized and deconstructed.
There was the presentation from the Deputy Superintendent of Motor Vehicles, about 87 pages, and counsel's presentation of 12 pages, or 65 points of argument. All managed by Hunt, the Supervising lawyer for the A G's office.
Familiar names to you now I hope.
Lets be very clear here, the presentation was done to bury me in paper work as this was the OSMV presentation for an early Dismissal of the Discrimination Complaint, called an Application to Dismiss and they know I do not have counsel. They had responded to the HRT acceptance of my second complaint of discrimination a month before. This is important to remember as there is another lie concerning this.
So, all this material showed up a month after the initial response to the complaint. This presentation and my response to it would be read by only one HRT member, not in the public forum of a Hearing. Sort of secret stuff.
If I didn't respond within the month my complaint would be dismissed, or if not a response with merit, value, and worth it would be dismissed. I responded in time. It is a Good response. It was so Good the OSMV lied about their presentation when trying to do damage control. They lied to make changes to legal documents for damage control.
***
Reader, if you are afraid of science and the bullshit some use, while using science against you, I'll send you a copy of my response and you will never be intimidated by science or those that use science against you ever again.
***
I attacked the papers just like I did the Draft and Second Draft, paragraph by paragraph and sometimes sentence by sentence, because I knew there was something wrong. Don't forget, the whole policy is corrupt, so why should anything from their counsel be believed.
What was wrong? I knew it was wrong but not what. It was Bullshit that I smelled. I started with the academic researcher's paper. She has 30 pages of Curriculum Vitae. The only reasons someone lists that much stuff is to hide something and to stroke one's ego. Science is not about stuff and ego. Not really. Have you ever read 30 pages of CV? I bet you haven't. It's to boring. But, its important when presented against you, as a stroke of power. It says, Just Believe.
However, the OMSV is screwing me and everything needs to be read. The HRT complaint is about Class 4 licensing and type 2 diabetes, as was the first complaint. I am not type 1 nor experiencing gestational diabetes.
With this much CV one just gives status, trust, power, prestige, and position to someone. We just do this.
As with the lawyers involved in this complaint, you just give power to them due to the status, trust, power,and prestige associated with their positions. The social contracts or maybe legal contracts supposedly guarantees you that what is presented is bona fide or justified. You do not believe they will lie and present stolen documents and they have. Thus the damage control of the lie about not understanding the scope. As if stealing 10 documents is less worse than 174.
One just gives, as there is a Trust. One should be able to read these presentation from lawyers as truthful and bona fide. (Hunt as she hired Heenan Blaikie.) The same should also apply to the academic researcher. The OSMV.
However, after the phoney amendment I learned that I cannot. Everything must be viewed as a lie.
So, one cannot trust the CV and its context to the matter at hand and they are presented first to tell you about power. How interesting to discover there is nothing about diabetes in the CV. There is nothing about Class 4 driving. There is nothing about hypoglycemia, the very reason for the policy. She has never written or published anything on the matter at hand. That is right. Nothing. The power play of 'position in society' is used to mislead.
Further reading of the academic researchers presentation brings one to the 174 “Referenced” scientific studies.
These 15 pages are stamped “For internal distribution only”. The pagination, 61-75 informs readers they were taken from some other publication or letter. In other words, she knows of Copyright Protection, Intellectual Property Rights, and Intent of Use protection. Any yet, she still presented the Science, some of it not even with a focus of diabetes, 90% plus about type 1. Some type 2 articles are the articles I list as proving there is no difference between non-diabetic and diabetic drivers.
Also, there is the Notary stamp, with a law firm, on her pages. The Notary stamp is used to justify the Presentation. To justify the use without the Permission Papers? Does the Notary know the science was used outside of the “For internal distribution only”? Does she know the presentation is to be used outside of Alberta? Is her stamp of approval, used outside of Alberta, legal? Why was the date on the Notary's stamp of approval re-dated? To forward -date the guarantee of legal and bona fide (ness) to after the date my HRT complaint had been accepted? In other words, the work had been done before my complaint?
Also, with the Notary's stamp there is a Law Firm attached. This means the Law firm is also involved. They are used as a form of power. What they are really stating is that we put our names behind this Notary, she speaks for us, believe and accept what you read. That is what their stamp of approval means.
Reader, you and I are supposed to believe stolen research is legal to use, to justify gov't social policy, because some Notary and law firm from far-away has stamped a document? Bullshit.
Some questions about this Notary charade need to be asked. Maybe the Notary would like to know about this. Maybe the Alberta law firm would like to know about this.
*
BBB stuff. The Bullshit Baffles Brains stuff.
What I realized about the early Dismiss presentation was, it was real big Bullshit. Not the average stuff but the Triple b stuff. Not the bbb, or the bBb stuff, but the BBB stuff. The Bullshit Baffles Brains stuff.
Once the reader understands this about the presentation the presentations are easy to deconstruct and criticize. I listed the Five Points of Engagement for evaluation, the Instruments of Democracy, and Hats worn, (is the Hat or Hats that make you really used in your presentation?) and graded the paper. It failed. One reason it failed is the researcher did not use the Hats that made her. Bullshit.
Secondly, she never addressed the Points that need to be attended to, Points that all researchers, doctors, scientists, really need to address; the need, the intervention can do what it is alleged to be able to do, the consequences, is there any Good, and what are we doing now. She never attended to any of these Points; the very stuff she is made of. Bullshit.
Third, the Instruments of Democracy are not mentioned. Bullshit.
Fourth, the academic researcher also has material in her presentation that is very similar to the Deputy and counsel's presentations. Wording is changed, paragraphs are changed, which changes pagination, which has one believing the information is different than the other papers. I believe this is called plagiarism. It's against the law isn't it. I believe this is called Padding, isn't it. Is this a constructed deception to make the presentation more weighed than it really is? Isn't this falsifying documents? Bullshit.
Fifth, there is the mess with the Notary and the law firm. This is more that a huge negative. Bullshit.
Lastly, she does not have permission to use the research. She has presented stolen material. Bullshit.

It's time for this again, “What the hell is going on with these people.”
And lastly, I came to understand that the BBB Bullshit was to hide the fact there was no Permission Forms for use of the Copyright, Intellectual Property Right, and Intent of Use.
The whole presentation was done to Bamboozle the reader and slip scientific documents in through an early Dismiss Human Rights Complaint, not seen by the Public, through the back door, past a non-scientist, non-academic researcher, past a Complainant not represented by counsel, in order to justify the policy.
The presentations from the Deputy and its counsel are not worth the time to write about here. If you want them and my response I can send copies.
However, (Is the lawyer allowed to pad, copy, plagiarize, or change wording and paragraphs to make her presentation seem different than the academic researcher's presentation? Someone altered the sentences and paragraphs to make them look different than the other. The buck stops with the lawyer.)

Reader, my deconstruction of the early Dismiss presentations from the OSMV stated they responded to the wrong diabetes and their presentation of diabetes was too great in scope, as was their scope of licensing. I let readers know there is something amiss with the presentations. There is purpose to the 'over presentation', it involves Bullshit Baffles Brains and with 174 articles presented to justify the policy “you just know” the OSMV is right and I am wrong. It is a really Good example of legal misrepresentation. Now you know why the OSMV lied to legally change the scope of the complaint. Damage control. But a lie was used to get the change in scope.
The fact is that if the OSMV had stayed on focus with Class 4 and type 2 they would not have had modern science to justify the policy even if the researchers had given them permission. I do not believe permission would have been given after I had informed them of what is really happening; with such letters as the 'updated consequences' and the facts of the killing and slaughter and maiming, the shuffling of funds to justify the policy, only on the other hand create a two year wait list for surgeries, and the harm, pain and suffering, and deaths associated with that charade.
As stated above, this Grand scope was contrived, constructed to bamboozle the reader and get their way with Bullshit. Just like the misleading information about a policy being real. Just like the charade about the phoney amendment. All false.

So, what did the OSMV do when confronted that I understood the bullshit and called them on this? They contrived another charade, just like the phoney amendment. Why not, they got away with it once. This was done to decrease the harm that I had caused by my deconstruction of the presentations, and done on time. I had not been working on this months in advance as their presentation seems to have been.
The OSMV stated it had misunderstood the scope of the complaint due to what was written by the HRT in the acceptance letter of my complaint. In it the HRT states the complaint is about diabetes, not type 2. This is a fact. However, the statement that the OSMV had misunderstood the scope is just another lie.
The idea for the definition of scope was simply damage control for the plagiarism, the theft of research, and for what ever else it determined needed protecting, like the Notary and law firm from Alberta stuff.
The OSMV had their counsel ask for a definition of scope, during a phone call concerning the Hearing date for the complaint, so I can't really prove this as only one member of the HRT was listening, but the HRT did write another acceptance letter defining the scope to be type 2.
So, the OSMV must have asked for something and I must have agreed.
Reader, the change of scope is supposed to decrease the harm caused by my response and to decrease the number of research materials stolen.
However, once the stolen research was presented one cannot say they were not used. They were presented, I responded to them, and the OSMV responded to my response. What the OSMV has tried to do is say we only stole those documents related to type 2, which will decrease the number from 174 to about 10. Theft is theft. You cannot steal things and then say we are not that bad as we stolen a bunch of stuff we shouldn't have, so stealing only 10 documents really isn't that bad. That's what the change of scope is really trying to do, damage control.
Reader, you really need to deconstruct everything they say and do.
Don't forget, the list of stolen documents also includes about 15 articles on Thyroid research. Just more bullshit to raise the Fear/Risk factor. Scare tactics. Fear mongering. I have not had anyone blame thyroid problems on diabetes. So, why are these studies listed?
This charade of the OSMV concerning the scope is just another lie. How do you know? How do I know?
The original Response to the Complaint has the OSMV counsel writing they knew the correct scope. They took it from a Grand scope, from 'diabetes', to only type 2. They did not focus on type 1 or Gestational diabetes as the matter at hand. The real focus is mentioned several times in that document. The OSMV took that Data from the acceptance letter, of diabetes in scope, 'Internalized' it into the matter at hand, type 2. They then took this Data turned it into 'Information', then played with it to come to an 'Understanding', then turned it into 'Knowledge' in order to write the Response to the Discrimination Complaint.
No, they knew the scope and just lied again to protect themselves, because I had the audacity to rise to them and catch them in a lie once more. All within a month timeline. I don't think they wrote the early Dismiss in the month from the acceptance of the Complaint and the Response to Complaint. So, how were they to bill the OSMV for work done, if I did not lodge a complaint? Interesting, eh.
So, the OSMV lied about not knowing the scope of the complaint as their original Response informs us they really did, just as I did, just as their lawyer did, in order to write the Response to Complaint, and when caught they got their lawyer to present the lie.
This is the same lawyer that presented the settlement agreement for the first human rights complaint. Was involved in the phoney amendment and breach. Involved in the Representative complaint. Wrote and presented the original Response to Complaint. Wrote a presentation to the second human rights complaint, which included all the above and now she presents the request for a definition of scope.
In the world that I live in she presented a lie. It is not believable that she did not remember what she wrote and presented within the Response to Complaint.

Reader, we all make mistakes. We all have indiscretions. Iyer made a mistake with a date. It was a mistake, not a manipulation. I made the mistake of contacting the Deputy to be a witness in the Hearing for this complaint. I was supposed to contact Iyer or counsel, the third party, for this kind of event and she formally let me know about it.
However, we are not allowed to lie. We are not allowed to present lies. The OSMV has counsel. It hired this lawyer to present for it. The Supervising lawyer for gov't is responsible for this lawyers presentations, one lawyer hires the other to present and then the other lawyer informs her employer that the job has been done. These lawyers are not naïve bystanders here. There is a strategy here. It probably began in 2002 with my initial inquiry. The OSMV knows the policy is not legally justified and it knows the harm it causes. It wrote to me that it did know. The killing and slaughter must be unbelievable in scope to be here now, seven years later, and the gov't is stealing documents and lying about it. Presenting that stealing a little is ok. It is not.
This complaint is so important the Supervising lawyer for Gov't is managing the complaint, it's a hands on complaint for her. In other words, she is responsible for the theft and lies.
The Heenan Blaikie lawyer cannot say, 'she did not know', or 'she was made to present the stolen research', or 'she was made to present the lie about the scope'. Ignorance at this level of trust, power, status, prestige, and position is not acceptable.
The lawyers present with powerful credentials; status, power, prestige, and trust. All values one lets their guard down to, especially coming from lawyers. All have been broken.

My point is, is this behaviour explained through the idea of gang? To protect each other? To set a strategy of protection for each other? Some kind of weird Honor to each other?
Civil servants have signed or taken an oath to support the Crown, or gov't. Doesn't this override any kind of pact these people have made?
Doesn't this oath demand civil servants to abide by the instruments of the Crown? In this case the Charter, the HR Code, and the MVA? Where is their duty to their oath? Where is the Honor to the Crown?
Gangs never back off. They commit and that commitment takes then places they may not want to go but their foul sense of importance and allegiance to each drags them along. Is this what is happening here? They have gone to far and the escape is beyond them, so they escalate their behaviour?

Secondly, my response again attacked the OSMV for not addressing the demands of the Charter, the HR Code, and the MVA. It also noted the Five Points of Engagement were not attended to.

Third, it also noted the Hats the academic researcher used to make her, were not used within the presentation. It brought forward the problem with copying or plagiarism. It brought forward the problem of padding.
So, the OSMV has nothing to offer to make me go away this time. It offered to pay for the illegal exam and to redo or rewrite or reevaluate the diabetic policy. It had years to do so.
So, with this new complaint it needs to justify the policy, the strategy is to pad, lie, plagiarize, and present stolen material and if caught lie about the presentation to try and decrease the actual numbers of articles stolen. To bamboozle the complainant, me and you if you read the presentations. If caught the scope can be brought forward as protection. Seems like a good strategy.
However, the diabetic steps up and responds. He also remembers to read the original Response to Complaint as he knows there is something wrong with phoney statement that the OSMV did not understand the complaint.
Don't forget the diabetics nose does work, it is not hampered by hypoglycemia, it works slowly but it works, it smells Bullshit. One cannot steal 174 articles and then say we made a mistake and we should only be held responsible for stealing those 10 or so articles mentioning type 2. Now that is real bullshit isn't it.

Reader, it is important that you realize I did not loose this complaint only that the HRT decided that I should wait until the Policy is given out.
Question; why didn't the HRT demand an explanation for the stolen research? Why didn't it reverse the changed scope after I figured out and could prove the demand for change was a lie?
Are these lawyers protecting lawyers? Are these lawyers protecting Iyer as she was a former employee of the HRT? Do they owe the A Gs office?
These things need to be asked.
***************************






Chapter 5
Stolen Research
Reader, who are these Owners of the research?
What is the cost of responding to the stolen research?
Water boarding
Lets see what these people have Really done with the Presentation of the Research
What is being done about Copyright infringement, Intellectual Property Rights theft, and Intent of Use misuse?
The Numbers of the Killing and Slaughter

Stolen Research
So, here I am confronting a social policy that has not been justified by the Charter, the HR Code, and the MVA. And yet, the gov't has used the Charter to justify it's policy, therefore the horrific killing coming from that policy. However, it has conveniently forgot to fulfill the demands of the Charter.
It has used the MVA to justify the policy and the killing but it changed the wording of the statutes, therefore the meaning and understanding of the statutes paraphrased. In other words it is illegal.
Those that I am confronting are the OSMV, the Solicitor General's office, the Attorney General's office, their private counsel paid by your and my taxes, unknown Internals and Externals with influence, (probably paid by our taxes to pretend policy is justified) and Fascists and Nazis who wrote new social policy concerning this illegal policy.
Important, reader, you really need to come to terms with this following fact. The Consequences of the policy are so horrific that the OSMV and government changed policy and offered to further make changes to the policy. This was supposed to take place in 2006, then early 2007. It is now July, 2009
I am not a politician, not in the Majority or Minority, not an Independent. I am not a major player in anything, like the corruption surrounding the car industry. I just woke up one morning to discover I have diabetes. I experienced the demands of the gov't upon diabetic drivers. I confronted them, that was seven years ago. The killing and slaughter in emerge has continued and escalated as diabetes has grown within society. And the people doing this decided to change policy immediately. That was the promise.

My point is, Prime Minister, Premier, Members of Parliament, Members of the Legislature, Press and everyone else involved in making Policy or trying to make Policy, you know how hard or completely impossible it is to make or change Policy.
These people changed policy due to my complaint. The only reason this happened so fast is that the policy really is illegal and the killing, slaughter, and maiming due to the policy is horrific. We now need to add the Harm of the surgery wait-times that I have just experienced.
Remember, Government fought people trying to get an investigation in the the East Side Vancouver disappearance of women in that poverty stricken area of Vancouver. The gov't was proved to be wrong. The Pig Farm killing is horrific. How bad is it here where the gov't changed policy to try and protect itself.
How bad is it here where gov't has been fighting me for seven years?
How bad is it here where the gov't broke the settlement agreement and played a charade to pretend they had renewed it, and the promise of a Policy, promised in 2006, then 2007, 2008 has gone by, and now half of 2009. When confronted about this stonewalling and corrupt Drafts the gov't has stolen Scientific Research to justify the policy, and then lied when confronted about the whole presentation.
How bad is it here where the Supervising lawyer for the A G office has been directing the response for seven years?
What does one do with such behaviour and actual deeds?
It is not just some phone call or conversation in an airport or hotel room like ex-Prime Minister has been involved in.
I don't have $300 000 for counsel. I don't have inexhaustible tax dollars to hire private counsel, such as the gov't has done with Heenan Blaikie. Or like the Attorney General's lawyers that live off our taxes and fight the public, not defend it.

Reader, you now know the policy is illegal and all the above and that the gov't is a liar. We know they will do anything to bury my inquiry, bury the consequences, bury the lack of Good, bury the shuffling of our tax dollars to pay for the policy, bury the phoney change of how the DME is defined, how it was magically changed to be a medical necessity. Bury how the diabetic visits doctors at a rate of 8-1 or 20-1. You know the Draft is written by some Fascists and Nazis; the very people those cleaver people that crafted the MVA did so in order to keep these twisted people out of our lives.
You know the gov't will do anything. It therefore stole science to justify the policy and tried to bury me in paper work in order that I could not offer a bona fide Response within the month timeline. (A timeline, like the one I missed with the Representative complaint.) It tried to justify the policy through the back door, a charade, one hand doing something while the other doing something else, just as it had tried to do with the breached settlement agreement, play a charade.
So, what did they really do? Think about it. These people, there are people that did this to me, they just think they are far more cleaver than everyone else. They've presented themselves above the law. Oh ya. There is a strategy here. These are top lawyers in their field. Who knows the training of others involved in this. They have a strategy and it plays out over years, dependent upon my responses and writing.
Reader, you know I'm patient, approachable, accommodating, and compromising. You know people take advantage of these values. Add that I am a diabetic, a killer in their view, and I am allowed to be treated as I have been. According to them.
Just remember I haven't changed the law to get my way. I haven't broken any contract and then tried to bury it in a charade. I haven't stolen any documents to get my way. I haven't lied to you. My classification of 'diabetic as Killer' is enough to make one puke. I am Canadian and do not need to bow to these people or kiss their ass.

Reader, who are these Owners of the research?
They are people far away not worrying about what is going on as their research is Protected with Copyright, Intellectual Property Rights, and Intent of Use instruments. Just like the OSMV material is protected. They do not care for, or probably know of, an insignificant petty gov't agency as the OSMV, or the insignificant Solicitor General's office in an insignificant provincial gov't such as us in BC, which is in a really insignificant country like Canada. Don't forget, we only have 32 million. We are indeed a small player within the 6 billion on this planet.
However, we are, today, All connected through Communication networks.
These smart guys that did this to me, have banked on the fact that there is 174 research articles, plus the 15 thyroid articles, and how is this diabetic, not represented by counsel, not a scientist, not an academic researcher, going to deal with this when we are two lawyers, the Deputy of the OSMV, and a so called real academic researcher, the Notary, and law firm in Alberta and who knows who else and he only has a month to reply.
You can just see them gloating can't you. Rubbing their hands together. We screwed this diabetic this time as he only has a month to respond.
How is he to challenge our status and power; six positions of power.
Reader, this is more than bullying. It is an assault upon me.
As I stated in the opening, I will not bow down to these people. I will not kiss their ass. I have done no wrong. Bullies and corruption need to be challenged and that is what I am standing up to. This is just white collar crime and it needs to be brought out into the light for all to see. I am not a killer. I am not a liability to society.

Reader, have you ever read a published research paper on diabetes? Is it relevant to type 2 and Class 4 driving? They are really hard to find as there really is no problem, so why do the research. Have you ever worked to collect 174 research articles for a presentation? Have you read the Copyright notation, the Intellectual Property Rights notation, the Intent of Use notation? What other restrictions are listed within the research paper? How long is it going to take you?

Again, this begs these questions,
“How long before I lodged my HRT complaint were these people working on the presentation that was presented for the early Dismiss?”
“If earlier than my complaint how would Heenan Blaikie bill the gov't for work done if I didn't lodge the complaint.”
“What would have happened if I lodged the complaint in 2009. How would they have billed for the work done a year ahead of time.”
“How long had the researcher from Alberta been working on the “References” or listing the research used?

This has overtures of the Mr. Mulroney Public Hearing and his secret money; only to be declared if need be.
“How can a private law firm work for the gov't if they haven't a need?” They do not seem to be on retainer as they are hired each time a complaint is accepted to be reviewed by the HRT?”
This begs the question of when the Notary was hired to do whatever the charade with her signature is about as well as the change in dates. This needs to be looked into.

So, what really went on with the OSMV presentation concerning the stolen research documents? Where are we with this response and my Discrimination Complaint?
Hold it. Hold it. You can not steal science and use it justify a social policy of a foreign government. A social policy of a Democratic society, that has not been justified by the instruments of that Democratic society. A social policy that does not conform or fulfill the needed Five Points of Engagement or protocol all of us use to justify our behaviour; that is, the need for something, can the intervention really do what it is alleged to be able to do, acknowledge the consequences, and is there any Good coming from the intervention, and what are we doing now or where are we? These are the things doctors must engage in before they cut into you or give you medications. And if you are honest, you do this also. If you are a business and you don't do this you will go broke. Gov't programs are failures due to the lack of this process.
The people doing this to me know this protocol.
The people doing this to me know about Copyright, Intellectual Property Rights, and Intent of use. Those that own the research have a Right to be informed.

What is the cost of responding to the stolen research?
Reader, it cost me about $20 for each package of letters mailed through Canada Post. This mailing costs about $400, without my time. Don't forget, the lawyers are riding on our tax dollars and the academic researcher is now employed by the OSMV, so they never pay for anything. They even have lunch on my tax dollar. I hope they get indigestion.

My point is, I have just been given 174 scientific research articles that have been stolen, which is a crime, which I need to contact, as I'm not a criminal but now involved? Who can I trust? Who can I trust within gov't? No one.
How do I contact the owners and what is the cost? The scope it grand. Where am I going to get $3480 in order to present a letter about the research theft and the consequences of the policy. What about my time?
The letters need to be registered as too many people are afraid to even acknowledge receipt of my letters concerning this discrimination complaint and the horror of the consequences. A least with Registered mail I know the letter has got to where it is supposed to go.
This is part of the Triple B's, the Bullshit Baffles Brains strategy. Bury this diabetic with paperwork and the complaint will come and go and no one will notice the difference.

Important. If you read my Response to the Draft and the response to the academic researcher you will see I'm not afraid of Science, as so many people are. So, how does one contact the New England Journal of Medicine because there research has been presented? Does the local library have their journals, the Main library, the local College or University? No. No you don't. You don't travel to these places personally.
This is 2009. Everyone is online. The Internet was developed by Scientists in order to talk to each other in real time. In real time, from all over the world. Type in NEJM and the home page directs you of Copyright, Permission Forms, and Intent of Use Forms, and how to contact the NEJM.

My point is, most of these listed research papers are published in journals or similar papers and journals have email address'. The journals also have Permission Forms for Copyright, Intellectual Property Rights, and Intent of Use. The links are all there.
The 174 articles came to be about 75-80 different journals or papers or Copyright or Intellectual Property Rights managers. I emailed all of them with a similar letter such as this and other attachments concerning my complaint, such as the 'updated consequences'.
They have a Right to know the OSMV stole their research and used it to justify a social policy that is just a killing machine.
Only two contacts have returned mail with thank you but we can not get involved.
Two out of 75-80. The rest have automatic responses to their Permissions Departments and some have responded that the “complaint of alleged Intellectual Property misuse (theft)” has been forwarded to their legal departments.
I realized the two journals might be volunteer organizations that publish papers or small business and probably not able to take on the Canadian government funded by tax dollars. (You don't think the lawyers involved in this haven't thought about this fact?)
Like me, where do you get funds to challenge the gov't? The gov't knows this and is indeed part of their bullying tactics.

My point is, reader, if I realized this fact, the people that are doing this to me must have worked through this also.
They are not the naïve bystanders here. Never allow yourself to be manipulated to be into that position with these people. Don't forget, that when I rose to their presentation in time and deconstructed it for what it is, the Triple BBB's, they whined to the HRT that they had misunderstood the scope; whined like little kids on the school grounds; whined like the little kid with the hand in the cookie jar. Sad to say they got their way. At least up to know. Now you know.
Don't forget, the initial Response to Complaint Form informs us differently. The HRT should have told them to live with their presentation and if they didn't like that they could phone their mommy and she could give them some hot chocolate and they would feel better. However, the HRT did not do so. Too bad.
So, what should I do?
Am I supposed to crawl off and lick my wounds, that they think they have given me, and give up. Give up to the A G's office, to the S G's office, the OSMV, to Heenan Blaikie, the academic researcher, the Notary and the law firm from Alberta, the Fascist and Nazi's that wrote the Draft, the Fascist and Nazis unknowns that support the policy but only through the dark hidden recesses of bureaucracy and other places.
Bullshit.
These people have misled me, labeled me as a killer, lied to me, broke the settlement agreement, stolen research, lied about that and I'm supposed to crawl off and hide like them. (Lawyers claiming they only do the clients bidding and the civil servants claiming they are only doing the gov't bidding. Really. And now my health has been jeopardized, my life endangered by the policy and the gov't corruption.
*
Water boarding
I mentioned my dad and his brother, Uncle Walter, who survived the Japanese concentration camps of WW II and for some reason lived another forty years. Have you heard about water boarding? Iraq? Obama said the USA, in other words the Democratic societies of the world, do not need to torture to win Iraq and other non-democratic societies. He's right. However, the reports and TV reports really didn't show what water boarding really is.
While in the prisoner of war, the concentration camps, Walter had a hose inserted into his anus. He was filled with water, turned over and a board was placed on his belly. It was rocked back and forth until the water was all rocked out. That is water boarding. Obama is right. We do not need to go there.
Walter never gave up. Why should I. I haven't done anything wrong accept challenge corruption.
It seems I come from good Canadian stock. I'm never going to crawl off and whine in the corner. Don't forget, the Deputy of the OSMV blamed the breach on some low level civil servant. Blame is interesting. Blame others for your problems. Blame the HRT for the wrong directions. Blame is part of Corruption, it always comes back and that is why we need to deal with it today, so when it comes around again others will stand up to it then. They will have our example like we use my dad and Walter's example.
We just pasted Canada Day. The people doing this to me do not deserve Canada, they are afraid to work for it. This is why we need a Public Inquiry. We need a judge not afraid of lawyers and civil servants and killing and slaughter.
We need a Court Case with Jury. We need a judge not afraid of lawyers and civil servants and killing and slaughter.
We need to fire some people. Senior civil servants as that will set the remaining foes against each other. Against each other as they will be trying for the vacant positions. Against each other to keep their high paid job and its pension. They will turn on each other as that is the nature of these people.
No, we do not need to water board. Some detectives and lawyers for the RCMP just need to ask some very good questions and watch the Play, not a charade this time. A judge not afraid of lawyers needs to ask some very good questions.
*
Lets see what these people have Really done with the Presentation of the Research

The OSMV used a Notary and a Law Firm in Alberta to supposedly legalize the use of the science. Therefore, the discrimination complaint is now multi-provincial in scope.
Hold it. The research is Canada based, as there is material from the Canadian Diabetes Association and other Canadian research.
Therefore, my complaint has been escalated to a National scope.
This means the scope has been moved beyond me. This is now a matter for Federal people, the RCMP.
Hold it. The research comes from all over the world.
This means the scope is International. This means Diplomatic Services are involved as foreign Intellectual Property has been stolen and used to justify a social policy against the diabetic, the disabled, that has not been legally justified in the first instance. Canada stole other countries Intellectual Property. Presented through a lawyer from Heenan Blaikie.

What is being done about Copyright infringement, Intellectual Property Rights theft, and Intent of Use misuse?
Blackberry had to pay a million gazillion dollars for its use of American IP, the music industry is in turmoil, universities are designing programs to catch plagiarism, the RCMP has an IP department to deal with people stealing our IP. Now they need to reverse their focus and look at Canadians and the BC gov't for stealing IP. Should be interesting, eh.

Reader, my taxes pay the RCMP and I then discovered they have an Intellectual Property department.
Therefore, other countries involved in this theft have national police that should be contacted. The USA is the closest and has the longest list of research presented, so I started with the USA.
The Homeland Security office refers one to the FBI, which in turn refers one to the American Consulate. Why the Homeland Security office? IP makes countries. We base our business and health and defense on IP. It is country owned. The Homeland Security protects the USA; it can move immediately to protect the country from attacks. It can immediately ban people from visiting their country. If I complained to it I might discover myself at the border and discover that I was a 'do not let in' person. I would not know why as they do not need to inform me. However, I would know why; involvement in International Intellectual Property theft. Interesting eh.
I really wanted to write the FBI. It sounds great doesn't it. The FFF Bee Eye. Sounds great.

So, the American Consulate and the other journals that have Consulates in Canada have been contacted about the alleged theft of their IP material.
The consulates run on tax dollars, therefore the journals that do not have funding to confront the OSMV and their lawyers, now have their diplomatic services, their national police, and national funds to speak for them.
So, that is where I am now. The owners of the research have also been contacted. The RCMP have been contacted. A number of Consulates have been contacted.
And now you are learning what is really going on with the diabetes DME, the corruption driving it, and how the consequences have now jeopardized my life.

The OSMV has taken this into the world forum, not me. Once again the OSMV tried to bamboozle me with BBB, another charade, and has been caught again. This time the world knows about it.
The world now knows the Canadian government will steal IP to get its way.
Reader, do you really support this?

Actually, this is Good thing. This shows how corrupt the policy against the diabetic, against the disabled, really is.
The world now understands that the government's own Greed for Power, Money, and Self Indulgence is in itself the problem with our Universal Medical System not the Ministry of Health, or Health Authorities, or the Hospital managers, or the Emerge doctors, nurses, and union staff or the Public as the gov't tells us.
No, our health care system works. The world now knows the gov't blames the public, but in really it is itself the problem.
Those countries that review of health care system now know why there are long wait times to see G P, overcrowding in emerge, long wait times for surgery, problems with ambulatory care, etc, etc.
It is the undisclosed demands of the OSMV and other gov't offices and ministries that are not acknowledged within the Review process of our medical system that has come to light through my discrimination complaint. These reviews are given to other governments and countries and we wonder why they label our medical system as dysfunctional.
I hope you now know who is dysfunctional.
*

The Numbers of the Killing and Slaughter

What really happens in Emerge. You go there or are taken there because you may die due to your condition, it's life and death stuff. The emerge doctors work with death every day. It is the nature of the Place. It is not your Place as a reporter, or politician ,or what ever you do. It is a really different Place to work.
Don't give me any crap about how you report death or see a death or been involved in a death. This is only an effort of denial, trying to belittle what is happening, the emerge is about life and death, 24/7. It is not the same world that you and I live in. You go there because you think you may be dieing or be suffering from something that is unimaginably wrong.

My point is, doctors have a knowledge of how many deaths happen in their job place. They know the everyday occurrences of death and the legal need to explain them.
So, how many deaths are happening to force doctors to call Press Conferences about the high number of deaths, the unexpected and unexplained deaths, the unnecessary death. What if the standard number of explained deaths are one a day, that's seven a week, or 365 deaths a year.
Do you really believe only one person a day dies in emerge? Multiply that by the busiest 10 hospitals?
So, if one or two or three deaths is the standard for everyday occurrences how many unexpected, unexplained and unnecessary deaths have driven doctors to jump up and down screaming 'I can't stand it anymore' and call Press Conferences? (See Steyn below)
Reader, do you really think these doctors are doing this for one unexplained death a month? A week? A day?
Within the 'updated consequences' letter I use the 10 largest and busiest hospitals to make my point, as not all hospitals will experience the overcrowding like large city hospitals; which in BC we have almost ten.
Lets just stay with one hospital as the doctors demanding Press Conferences are talking for their busy large hospital.


Unexplained deaths in one busy Hospital Deaths in Afghan War (120 to date)
1 per day = 365 a year (this would be a reason for a Press Conference) approximately 15 a year since 2001
1 per week = 52 a year (this could be a good reason, but would the 0 per week
shift work, overcrowding, number of
staff and people involved allow this to surface?)
1 per month = 12 a year (would this be noticed?) 1 per month

2 per day = 730 a year (this would get the doctors attention) approximately 15 a year
2 per week = 104 a year (maybe) 0 per week
2 per month = 48 a year (is this noticed?) 1 per month

3 per day = 1095 a year (would catch someone's attention. Is this what is really approximately 15 per year
going on the large busy hospital such as VGH, Burnaby,
New Westminster, St. Paul's, Lions Gate, Surrey?)
3 per week = 156 a year (would this be noticed?) 0 per week
3 per month = 36 a year (would they be lost in the overcrowding, etc?) 1 per month

What really defines how many unexplained deaths are driving doctors to call the Press and make the killing public?
One a day? Two a day? Would these deaths be noticed during the shift work that is experienced by emerge doctors and staff? The deaths begin to roll over into the next shift and the next shift, 12 hr shifts for three or four days at a time, then a new shift of people. The folder for unexplained deaths would also begin to fill up. Where is the Coroner in all this?
Reader, we could then have 365 or 730 unexplained deaths in one hospital and that is why these doctors are freaking out and screaming I can't stand it anymore. This is for one hospital only.
In BC there are a hundred or so hospitals but only a few that are large and experiencing the overcrowding. I may be wrong, maybe small hospitals experience the same so the unexpected death rate is increased again. Add to the above list of large hospitals, two hospitals in Victoria, Nanaimo, Richmond, and Prince George or Kamloops, or Kelowna. All large hospitals. Take ten.
We now have 182 deaths x 10 hospitals = 1820 unexplained deaths. (every other day)
We now have 365 deaths x 10 hospitals = 3650 unexplained deaths. (one a day)
We now have 730 deaths x 10 hospitals = 7300 unexplained deaths. (two a day)
And this is for only one year. I began my inquiry in 2002 and those doing this to society didn't even put the policy on hold.

And you wonder why doctors are screaming foul. And you wonder why the OSMV changed the wording to the MVA, broke the settlement agreement and have not offered a Policy, and have stolen research to justify their illegal policy. You wonder why gov't labels me as the killer. Just another part of the charade. Just as the Deputy OSMV blamed the low level civil servant for the breached settlement agreement, and then the HRT for the wrong scope, they just Blame the other guy, blame the diabetic, the disabled for societies woes and will do whatever to bury the consequences of the policy.

Lastly, 9/11 killed 2974 innocent persons and the world went to War. (Wikipedia) Think about that.
And the killing the doctors are reporting is only for BC. Is this a new kind of Genocide. A Crime Against Humanity?



Last Chapter, Conclusion
This is for those Readers that read Conclusions first to see if the rest of the stuff may be worth reading.
How many Ghosts are to be created due to this policy?
What I want
Financial Penalties for Harm Done
My Demands

This is for those Readers that read Conclusions first to see if the rest of the stuff may be worth reading.
What can I say. If I use point form you will not believe this is happening.
So far, it involves the Ministry of Health, Solicitor Generals' office, Attorney Generals' office, OSMV, diabetics, the disabled, gov't lawyers, one of the most prestigious law firms in Canada, the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, Human Rights Tribunal, the Motor Vehicle Act, my rights, your rights, the gov't shuffling money to pay for the diabetic policy, lack of funding for medical operations due to the shuffle, arbitrary decisions about what is a medical necessity and what isn't, breach of my human rights out of court settlement agreement, a phoney amendment to it, a charade to present the phoney amendment, a Draft of the diabetic drivers' Policy to come, which is corrupt in itself, a New Policy, (it turns out it was just another Draft), and the lack of the Policy concerning diabetic drivers that was promised in 2006, then 2007. It is now 2009. It includes gov't lies.
It includes 174 stolen research articles presented by gov't to justify a social policy that has not been legally justified and lies offered because they were caught presenting the theft.
As the owners of the stolen research are from across Canada, this is now multi-provincial in scope, National.
As the owners of the stolen research are International, this is now International in scope.
This theft has taken my inquiry out of my hands and the RCMP have been contacted as well as a number Consulates as they represent their countries business, especially when it comes to protecting Intellectual Property.
The OSMV has also used a Notary and a Law Firm out of Alberta to justify the use of the articles, I think that is what her stamp and signature were used for. Is this falsifying documents?

Reader, just because the RCMP and Consulates have been contacted about this matter does not get you off the hook so to speak. Because Politicians can stop this policy immediately you have an obligation, the duty, the Responsibility to Stop the diabetic DME before anyone else dies. How many are to die from the time of this mailing to your receipt of it and then the phone call to stop it? If the OSMV can change funding policy at its will the policy can be stopped immediately.
Don't forget, it has not been justified in the first instance and offers no Good.
*
How many Ghosts are to be created due to this policy?
Ghosts because they do not want to move on until someone explains their death. All or most religions have some place to go after we die or we experience reincarnation. Why not hang around for a while to have things explained before moving on. If you believe in Souls then there is a problem here. If you believe in the after life, then why not Ghosts.
You tell me the survivors of the unexpected unexplained deaths don't talk to their loved ones? That is right. Their loved ones walked into or were taken to the emerge and expected reasonable health care, instead they died.
They died due to the consequences of an unjustified social policy, only there because some boys and their pissing contest.
No. These souls haven't moved on. Why should they? They're ghosts right now. And they will be until something is done about their unexpected, unexplained, and unnecessary deaths.
Ghosts. Interesting thought, eh. Why not? Don't you have a Soul?
*

What I Want
Financial Penalties for Harm Done
My Demands

Financial Penalties for Harm Done
Firstly, don't ever forget, I have not done anything to anyone.
Why this needs to be done at this time.
The Fascists and Nazis that wrote the Draft and New Policy and the Fascists and Nazis that proofread the Draft and New Policy and their bosses that presented it to me, the public, therefore you, have made some dire statements about me; the worst statement we can state or write about another person, human. That I am a killer. I am not a killer.
They have used future medical conditions to justify the policy, which are horrific to say the least, and they will express now. Yes. Now. I have had diabetes for a least ten years. This is within the timeline that the Nazis have stated that I will experience these devastating diseases and medical conditions.
So horrific the gov't consciously bypasses, disregards, fails to acknowledge the real demands of the Charter, the HR Code, and the MVA to play their game; the game of Fear/Risk, the game of fear mongering to get their way without legal justification.
These medical conditions kill and maim people. They can incapacitate a person, both physically and mentally or cognitively.
If these conditions pronounce, or express, now, I will not be able to list what I want for the Harm done to me and my estate will not know what to do.
Don't forget, the gov't has been stonewalling about the policy. This is the beginning of the eighth year. They have been stonewalling knowing I will suffer or perish to these conditions and their horrific consequences.
This is like a last will and testament. You have my previous communications and now you have this as the conclusion of the communications just in case the world of the Nazis comes true and I die tomorrow or am incapacitated.
This is so my estate and those involved have sound reasoning supporting demands for harm done.
As with the stolen research I was forced to rise to where the gov't had taken the complaint, federally and internationally. I now need to rise to where the gov't has taken this aspect of the complaint, future medical conditions and diseases that may kill me or incapacitate me today as the discrimination complaint as carried on for so long, therefore forward thinking is again needed. Another aspect of the Wholeness needed to understand and respond correctly to the OSMV and its help.
*
174 stolen documents at $250 000 each (as each is a different article) = $43 500 000. This is for the OSMV as it is the Player here, although part of the Solicitor General's office. DVDs have a penalty of $250 000 for breach of Copyright.
Hold it. Hold it. This is for Copyright, but there is Intellectual Property, and Intent of Use, so I am being light with this demand.
So, lets say 3 x $43 500 000 = $130 500 000
(Don't forget, the Thyroid research must also be included.) Howie has earned the consequence of being fired.

As Hunt is the Supervising lawyer for all this, a hands on approach, verses just managing at arms length, she represents another independent ministry, funded individually from other ministry's and needs to be fined, so that the next time there is not even a blink of the eye to decide to go this way there needs to be consequences. Hunt has earned the consequence of being fired.
So, for the Attorney General's office there is the same fine as she manages the whole affair; $130 500 000

As for Heenan Blaikie. It is just an entity here. It has lots of shareholders, all the lawyers and staff. There is 700 lawyers. (Approximately 1000 staff, sounds reasonable for staff.)
So, one lawyer was involved in the phoney amendment, didn't make sure I knew she had been hired by the OSMV, didn't play due diligence with the phoney amendment, presented the stolen research documents, and then presented a lie for the OSMV feigning they did not really understand the scope of the discrimination complaint. Don't forget, the Response to Complaint Form informs us differently. There is also the plagiarism or copying or padding or manipulation of statements within the Dismiss application to make it seem more weighted than it actually is that I also discovered. What is the legal term for that strategy when caught?
So, the lawyer did not lie but presented a lie. She did not steal but presented stolen goods. There is a breach of Trust that is or almost sacred between the law and public. This is certain conflicted.
This is important as H B is riding on my tax dollar with this case. This leads us, the public, to understand that H B is not trustworthy. And yet, they are multi-provincial working for Provincial work, payed by our taxes. If doing Federal work they are paid by our taxes. How can we trust they are doing due diligence and completing the work after these bizarre charades with one of their employees?
Reader, I warned H B earlier on when the phoney amendment charade went down, I wrote their head office in Montreal and complained about their colleague, I don't know if she is a Partner. I also complained about Hunt to the A G at the time. I was told to get legal advice if I wanted to continue with my inquiry into the charade and breach of contract.
So, what to fine them so H B manages their colleagues a little better.
$10 000 seems to be a reasonable fine. $10 000 per lawyer as the weight of H B has been thrown at me with all its status, trust, power, prestige, and position.

700 x $10 000 = $7 000 000
This seems reasonable as this gesture of good-will will certainly re-build the confidence lost due to one of their colleagues.
It will also re-build the public's confidence in their belief that H B is trustworthy and professional in its endeavours to manage the publics welfare and business.
H B should also fire this lawyer as it needs to defend the other 699 lawyers it has. As H B was warned about their colleague, there are other strikes here. She is past the number of strikes needed to be called out. This lawyer went to Harvard, taught law, and worked for the HRT. She sold herself to you because she is supposedly good at what she does. I have caught her a number of times, so maybe she is not good, maybe she has not delivered on what she has sold you on. This will re-build the publics confidence in H G, as it will demonstrate that H B will manage their staff that do more than have a bad day. H B, we are not talking about one or two bad days here.
At this present time why should Canadians allow H B to be involved in our business when we cannot Trust it?
S G office $130 500 000
A G office $130 500 000
H G $7 000 000
- - - - - - - - - - - -
$267 000 000
I do not know what to say about the Notary and the law firm in Alberta. If they were abused or lied to about what was done with the research, then they need to sue for damages.
If they are involved in the charade, then equivalent fines need to be imposed.

The Fascist and Nazis that wrote the Draft and New Policy need to be fined and fired.
They are the enemy of every democrat in the world. The enemy of every disabled person in the world.
I will not take their fines but give them to an organization they hate; something like the diabetes organizations or religious or minority organizations that need financial help.

Those in gov't that supported the Draft for publication should be fired. Their hate is not acceptable.
We need to find out who they are as they work anonymously and pretend they do not need to be responsible for their actions. They hide in the dark. They need to be held responsible for the consequences of the policy and their actions.

Those Internals and Externals the SMV makes reference to as bodies of influence he bends to need to be found out.
They need to be told they are not needed as they base their support upon nothing and that is not good enough in Canada.
They need to be held responsible for the consequences of the policy.
If they are gov't employees they need to be fired.
Maybe the next time these gov't offices and private business will come to understand the demands of the Charter, the HR Code, and the MVA and the five Points are bigger than them. Don't forget, I haven't made this a Charter challenge, I only asked why the OSMV uses the Charter to justify its policy, but has refused to fulfill any of the demands of the Charter that would legalize the policy.
Maybe the next time they will protect protected material as their own material is protected.
Maybe they will treat a person, that is not represented by counsel, with the respect as if they were.
Maybe the next time the gov't will tell the truth.
Maybe these fines will help.
Every civil servant involved in this should be fired as there is absolutely no way they have fulfilled their oath to the Crown.
*
Lets review again
Firstly, don't ever forget, I have not done anything to anyone.

I've had the guts to ask a corrupt gov't why they are doing things to me only to discover there is no Policy, which we were led to believe there was.
The MVA has been changed to make it look as if the SMV can do what she or he wants to do. Is this falsifying legal documents?
The settlement agreement was broken and not fixed. Blame was loaded upon a fall guy. A charade was played with a phoney amendment, smokescreen, and another fall guy and I only found out about this months after the deed.
I was reimbursed my DME and other disabled drivers were not and yet they were included in the change of who pays for the DME. I discovered this too late for the Representative complaint to be heard.
A Draft of the Policy to come is full of misleading information, misinformation or lack of information, fear mongering, and the lie that future medical conditions can be used to justify policy today.
The gov't has now stolen scientific research and presented it to justify the policy. A Notary's stamp and a law firm from Alberta were used to supposedly legally justify the use of the scientific research. Is that more falsifying legal documents? The stamp has been 'updated' to declare the documents were put together after I had made a HR complaint? The stamp and legal firm are use to legalize and prove the contents are bona fide, all is Right and True and believable.
However, 500 or 600 pages of Permission Forms should have been there to prove the gov't had legal use. When confronted about the presentation the gov't lied when stating they did not know the scope of the human rights complaint. This was done as damage control. However, the research was presented illegally and trying to lessen the number of articles used does not lessen the illegal use of all of them; they were all used and if I did not stand up to the gov't you would think there is a grand body of work supporting the policy and legal use was given. Isn't this misleading through stolen documents? Falsifying legal documents?
Do you really think the owners of the research would give Permission to Use especially after they read about the consequences and how their research was stolen in the first place.
*



My Demands

* I want the policy canceled immediately as a Public Inquiry and a RCMP Inquiry and Court case with Jury will take years to come to some conclusion and we cannot afford to have one more unexpected and unexplained death due to the consequences of this policy. These unexpected and unexplained deaths need to be explained.
Additionally, we need to count the deaths of those waiting for surgery, at least since my complaint of 2002. Little lone the maiming and addiction to drugs some of those waiting for surgery will experience. These unexpected and unexplained deaths need to be explained.
How do we label these deaths? They are not an accident such as vehicle death , which is an accident, as the OSMV has written it knows of the demand upon the health care system, therefore the horror of the consequences of the policy are known and accepted. Does this mean the deaths should really be listed as 'death due to an indifference to human life' or something worse as the OSMV has stonewalled and now stolen research to justify their wants?
Is there intent? With what I have experience there certainly is intent to harm.
What about it Coroner?
If we do not do anything now, how do we label the next unexpected, unexplained death in an overcrowded emerge? What comes after 'death to indifference to human life'? Does this mean the deaths are some level of man-slaughter?
Reader, you really need to ask yourself, “Where has the OSMV and its Fascists and Nazis, and their counsel taken us these past years concerning my complaint and the consequences of the policy, while not even putting it on hold knowing full well the consequences?”
How horrible are the consequences of the policy for the gov't to contrive all that has happened to me since my initial inquiry of 2002? What the hell is really going on?

* The policy cannot be just put on hold. The OSMV and its supporters have had the opportunity to cancel or put the policy on hold and they have not. They have chosen to do nothing knowing the consequences. Putting the policy on hold is not acceptable as it still indoctrinates the public that the diabetic is a killer and must be labeled and managed at all cost. Even though the demands of the Charter, the HR Code, and the MVA have not been fulfilled. Canceling the policy is the only way to get doctors doctoring, to stop the killing, slaughter, and maiming in emerge, and debunk the gov't lies about the diabetic being a killer and that the policy save lives.

* I want our tax dollars, the funds that have been shuffled around to pay for the DME, used to fund the operations that are now wait listed. These operations are justified and fulfill the demands of the five Points. It will put the operating rooms back operating as the funding used to fund an illegal policy, used for demands upon the medical system, will now be used to do actual Good. If the gov't can shuffle funds this quickly to the S G's office for demands upon the medical system, they can be shuffled back to, or to, the Ministry of Health for the surgery wait list as the funds are already associated with medical care.

* I want a Public Inquiry into what is going on with the policy and the corruption associated with it.

RCMP
* I want the RCMP to investigate the presentation of the stolen research. 174 research articles were presented. That means 174 separate charges for Copyright, Intellectual Property Rights, and Intent of Use.
There are fifteen articles on Thyroid Disease that are presented as well. I do not know why these have been presented, just more Fear Mongering. The owners of this research must also be contacted. I haven't done this as I stayed with the diabetic research. There are more charges for these.
-----I want the RCMP to investigate the paraphrasing of the MVA statutes under my belief this is falsifying legal documents. The statutes did not need to be paraphrased for space on the Response to Complaint Form, additional paper is allowed. They could have been written in their entirety, therefore allowing readers to fully understand their strengths and demands. Was Hunt, Supervising lawyer for the Attorney General's office, supervising this charade?
The needed Trust between the public and a lawyer was broken with this response. This is wrong. I do not know if this is a legal wrong, a social contract wrong, or just wrong. I should be able to take what is offered by a lawyer as the Truth. The paraphrasing is not the truth.
-----I want the RCMP to investigate the breached settlement agreement and the phoney amendment. I only serendipitously discovered what had been done two months later. Hunt, the Supervising lawyer for the Attorney General's office, was involved in this charade, as was Iyer, from Heenan Blaikie. The public is misled to believe the breached settlement agreement has been fixed or had an amendment to it. The OSMV has not fixed the settlement agreement and yet has carried on as if it has. This is more deception. Broken Trust due the gov't and the lawyers involved.
-----I discovered I have a legal right to be informed if the gov't hires counsel. In other words my Rights were taken away. RCMP, is this a charge that can be added to the list?
I was informed that the OSMV had hired counsel for the first discrimination complaint, #1954. Again for the Representative complaint, #5699, as well as the second discrimination compliant #5791. I was not informed that the OSMV had retained counsel, Iyer, for the breached settlement agreement? Why not? The breach happened three months after the signing of the agreement. All the lawyers were gone and Howie, the Deputy Superintendent of Motor Vehicles, was my official contact. If Iyer was on retainer, or hired counsel, she as the third party, should have contacted me, but she didn't. Remember from above, when Iyer scolded me for contacting the Deputy, where is should have been her, the third party,why didn't she contact me? I had a Right to know that she had been hired, there is due diligence. I had the right to know she was up to something. I didn't know anything until months later. The needed trust between the public and a lawyer was broken. Hunt should have informed me she had hired Heenan Blaikie to deal with the breach. She didn't. This is wrong. Iyer should have made sure I knew she had been hired to deal with the breach, she didn't.
How would you feel if you discovered they had played the charade and you only found out about it months later. That's right, you would have felt assaulted. That is what it is. That charade is just an offal thing to happen to you. You are turned invisible, the Other. Not even there. Both these lawyers should loose not only their jobs but their privilege to practice law in Canada. I still have a really hard time understanding how low these lawyers and Howie think I am to treat me like they did. They treat me like shit on the sidewalk.
-----I want the RCMP to investigate the lie the OSMV presented about misunderstanding the scope the discrimination complaint #5791, as the Response to Complaint Form informs readers the OSMV really did know the scope of the complaint. This is important as the HRT did change the scope but only through a lie. I agreed to the change because the request was coming from the gov't and their counsel. I should be able to Trust a lawyer that what is being presented is the truth and it wasn't. The lawyer presented a lie. She wrote the Response to Complaint and knows the OSMV knew the true scope and she wrote about it.
The needed trust between the public and a lawyer was broken. This is wrong.
The phone call request was really hard to accept as the phone call with Howie about the breach was to say the least more of the charade concerning the breach. A promise to deliver the Draft was made and it didn't come. That is when I wrote the SMV and complained about the initial breach and the second breach. He forward it to Hunt. She replied that only I make the statement that Howie promised the Draft in three weeks and a document to amend the broken settlement agreement. She didn't phone me for tea. So, with the phone call about the scope one needs to just accept the lawyers request although I knew there was something wrong. I smelled it. It took a month or so before I remembered to review the original Response as my focus was upon the Dismiss and the stolen research.
So, why wasn't the request from counsel done on paper so all could read it? Why was something so important done on phone again? No written record no proof of inappropriateness? They forgot the original Response. Too bad.
-----I want the RCMP to investigate the theft of the research as to the Copyright, Intellectual Property Rights, and Intent of Use demands or Protection.
I want the RCMP to investigate the presenting of stolen documents.
Not only has the gov't stolen documents their lawyers have presented them for the gov't. Readers of the documents should have been able to just read the presentation knowing the scientific research had been given Permission of Use. I should not have needed to wonder what was wrong with the presentation but that is what is needed and I was right.
Reader, there is a trap here that we all fall into. Who's presenting the science? Two groups really. The Supervising Counsel for the Attorney Generals office and Heenan Blaikie; lawyers, where I should be able to let my guard down and just read and respond knowing due diligence has been done, especially when concerning such ever day public occurrences such as the demands of Copyright, Intellectual Property Rights and Intent of Use. One just expects due diligence to be done and that they have permission to use especially knowing the OSMV has not presented any documents before.
Additionally, there is the Notary and the law firm from Alberta. All positions of power, trust, prestige, and status.
There is also the gov't, the Solicitor Generals office, the OSMV, their newly hired academic researcher, and those that wrote the Draft and those that supported it for the public. All positions of power, trust, prestige, and status. One just expects due diligence to be done.
The values of power, trust, prestige, and status were used to misdirect, misrepresent, manipulate, and abuse. It is wrong.
The needed trust between the public and a lawyer was broken. This is wrong. How many times is this?
The needed trust from gov't is non-existent now as it has misinformed, misled, not informed, lied, and stolen documents.
-----I want the RCMP to investigate the charade concerning the use of the Notary and the law firm from Alberta to justify the presentation that contained the stolen scientific research. Was she used as a fall guy if I caught the theft? Her signature is stamped right above the statement that says, “For internal distribution only”. In other words, Dobbs, the academic researcher knows that Copyright, Intellectual Property Rights, and Intent of Use rule the day and that it is very serious business to manage these protection tools. If she didn't want to spend a hundred years in court proceedings for breaking them she would need to protect herself with some kind of statement; she did. And then she broke her own rules.
Was this presentation part of getting the new job with the OSMV? Don't forget, her CV of thirty pages informs us she publishes and knows of the pitfalls of not protecting research and using it without Permission.
Is the Alberta Notary stamp good in BC? If not, was the stamp used as a ruse, another charade, to present the science as usable? If caught with the ruse does this mean that no laws in Alberta were broken, so all is well? (No laws broken because the presentation was in BC not Alberta?) And if not caught the charade was worth the gamble as they would have science to justify the policy and consequences?
What about the law firm that is attached to the Notary stamp? It is also used as a power tool, with trust, prestige, and status attached. What is their involvement in this?
What happens when a crime, the falsifying of these documents to be bona fide, leaves one province and comes to another? Is there problems with doing so. Cross border crime?
The research is stolen. It was then mailed to me from Heenan Blaikie. Not through Canada Post as I use, but a private firm. Is this mail fraud?
-----Was the Notary lied to about the use of the material? If she was, what does that say about the documents she signed? Has she been lied to, therefore the documents are false as their legal use was just a ruse, therefore illegally gained?
Some RCMP detectives and lawyers need to work through this charade.
The needed trust between the public and a representative of the law, a Notary, also attached to a law firm, was broken. This is wrong.
To me that is falsifying legal documents. It is also wrong as both use status, trust, power, and prestige to influence. This influence is so that readers just accept the science presented has been approved for use, which means the consequences have been presented to the owners of the research and they accept responsibility for any harm.
-----I want the RCMP to investigate the people doing this me through the idea of Gang related activities. The Matriarchal Mommas Gang. (From above.)
-----I want the RCMP to investigate why the HRT did not charge the OSMV with presenting stolen scientific research. Not acknowledged because the person evaluating the complaint is a lawyer? Lawyer protecting lawyer? Not acknowledged because Iyer was a former Human Rights employee?
-----I want the RCMP to investigate the three presentations concerning #5791, the early Dismiss, the stolen research case, about how it came about that the dialogue, or writings, are so similar within the presentation. Is it plagiarism? Is plagiarism acceptable within these legal documents? Would that just be a form of padding and is that acceptable as it really manipulates the reader to believe the presentations are more worthy or weighed than they really are.
Secondly, the similarity is interesting in that some words, sentences, and paragraphs have been manipulated, edited, to make the writing or dialogue seem different than what has been used in the other presentations. Enough change that one page would be read as two pages in another presentation, giving the reader the idea of new material as one has turned a page. This is more than plagiarism, there is intent to deceive the reader into believing the presentations are different, making the “wholeness” of the presentation seem to be constructed on new material, and weighty indeed. Where in reality, the material is copied and manipulated to get to where the OSMV wants to take the reader. Just another charade that I have caught them at.
Is it legal to mislead the reader this way? I don't think so, it strikes me as falsifying legal documents.
* -----I want the RCMP to investigate the civil servants and the declaration they sign when becoming civil servants. I believe they make a commitment to the crown, which means among other things to act or participate in the demands of the Charter, the Human Rights Code, and the Motor Vehicle Act. What has happened to me is not allowed, stealing and lying is definitely not allowed. RCMP you make the legal list and a moral/ethical list of things they have done to me that they should not have done.
* -----In reference to the above spinal operation that I 'needed' to have done. The lack of access to health care jeopardized my physical health, my life. As can be clearly seen funds were available to pay for the illegal medical exam, the DME, which is not a real need and offers no Good. It is done for personal wants from some very irresponsible people that somewhere made decisions concerning their wants, a “view” they hold, supported by the discrimination against the diabetic and disabled, pretending the Good is more worthy than funding needed spinal operations and all the other operations on the wait list.
The people that contrived this decision cannot pretend they did not know what they were doing as their decision to fund the DME came about through my discrimination complaint, where I also confront them and their negative consequences and negative demands upon the health care system.
It turned out they already knew the DME had negative consequences upon the medical system and the new funding to pay for the illegal policy should have gone to something with a real need and offered Good. They made a conscious decision to disregard the harm to those on the surgery wait list for their personal “view” of the diabetic as pariah, the Other.
No. The people that made the decision to fund the illegal policy decided that the harm to those waiting for surgery was a less harm compared to the diabetic and disabled driver supposed harm. They consciously decided that they would support the known DME harm compared to their believed diabetic harm. Knowing they had not fulfilled the demands of the Charter, the HR Code, and the MVA.
No. These people played with my life, trying to justify the harm due to their wants. They are just part of the hate and corruption concerning this policy.
These people need to be in front of a Judge and jury and a Public Inquiry to explain their support for an illegal policy with horrific consequences.
They need to explain how they balanced off that harm that they cause, the negative impact upon the health care system and the new harm I have just experienced, the surgery wait lists.
Yes indeed, the harm caused by the policy is extensive in scope and these people know it. Therefore, fearful language, the lies, breached contract, misinformation, lack of information, and theft of documents to get their way. The road kill and maiming from the Motor Vehicle policy is horrific to say the least.
I want the RCMP to investigate the use of funds for an illegal policy that shuffles funds away from bona fide medical needs, which has the direct consequence of endangering my health, my life.
Those that are doing this to me have no right to endanger my life, solely basing their policy upon a “view” of diabetics, a pissing contest, and stolen scientific research. They know the consequences of their behaviour. I just experienced another negative consequence of it.
I want these people investigated and charged with endangering my life.
*
End RCMP

* I want civil servants fired for what they have written about me and the things that have been done to me.
I want civil servants fired for not doing anything but protecting the policy knowing its consequences.
I want civil servants fired for the Hate language of the Draft and blaming others for their woes.

This firing is important as the Gomery Commission recommends we hold those in power to account. Misrepresentation, misinforming, lies, breaches of settlement agreements, phoney amendments, blame, stealing, a genuine or bona fide lack of trust of the legal system are all good reasons to hold civil servants to account, to fire civil servants.
When this happens all the others involved in these charades, the unknowns, the Internals and the Externals, those that believe they are beyond accountability, and the irresponsible will turn on each other to keep their well paid jobs and pensions. This is their nature as they are all working under the protection of anonymity and when brought to light they will do whatever to survive.
Reader, no matter what the harm to your loved one there will be no need for any water-boarding, as they will turn on each other and enlighten us all.
Reader, now matter your disgust for the things that are happening to me, thus Canada, there will be no need for any water-boarding, as they will turn on each other.
This will allow the RCMP to watch the show, to ask a few pertinent questions here and there and make a list of all those involved in the corrupt policy and its horrific consequences.
It should be interesting.

* -----One does not need to be a Canadian citizen to practice law in Canada. It is a privilege to be able to do so. All the lawyers involved in this should have that privilege revoked in Canada. They escalated this inquiry or human rights complaint to be multi provincial and International, or to a grand scope therefore the penalties are of grand scope.
They need to be disciplined immediately by what ever means as they have broken the trust, not me. The lawyers are not naïve bystanders. And I think we all know the Law Society will not stand up to them.
The things these lawyers have done are not acceptable.

* -----I want a public apology from the government for stating the “policy saves lives”. This statement is an absolute lie. It indoctrinates the public into believing the diabetic as a liability, used as the underpinning for diabetic as pariah, therefore the Other. An apology from the senior civil servant that wrote the comment and the senior civil servant that supported him is not acceptable. It will do nothing coming from these two, as they did not take any responsibility for their actions to begin with. It is the civil service that is corrupt. Someone needs to inform it that it is wrong and what they are doing is not acceptable.
This statement informs the public that the policy is bona fide and needed. This is a lie.
This statement informs the public that diabetics and disabled drivers are killers. Killers killing at a rate higher than non-diabetic or non-disabled drivers are killing. The difference in driver mishaps between the non-diabetic and diabetic driver is the supposed want for the policy in the first place and hypoglycemia and future medical conditions are supposedly the influences causing the difference. You now know this is also a lie.
No documents were offered to prove the policy saves lives. No documents were offered to prove the diabetic is a killer. No documents have been offered to prove there is any Good from the policy. (How irresponsible and unprofessional is that, but of course the diabetic and disabled are the Other, therefore laws and social standards do not apply.)

* I want my money back from my spinal surgery. I should not have needed to fund my own spinal operation. Since 2006 the DME has been funded by our taxes. The above explains the corruption concerning the policy and its funding, which is not a bona fide demand upon the medical system and offers no Good, whereas the surgeries on the wait list are bona fide demands upon the medical system with Good consequences. Our tax dollars that are now used to justify the policy could have retired all the wait list surgeries with cash on hand to support emerge or hospital beds or children or what ever. The surplus funds would stay within the health care system as they are now used yearly for a corrupt policy anyway.
MRI $875.00
Consult for surgery $750.00
Surgery $7 520.00
Overnight care $1 050.00
Ferry Fare $150.00 (If done under health care the operation would be done in Vic, therefore added cost)
Hotel (2 nights) $300.00 (If done under health care there would not have been hotel accommodation.)
----------
$10 645.00
*


Minister of Health, July 15, you held a press conference and talked about cut backs of funding for health care.
You told all agencies concerned that they would need to cut services offered, to lessen the demand upon the health care system. You informed those on surgery wait-lists that they would need to wait longer.
What you really did was blame the Public for the woes of the health care system and the Greed and Corruption in gov't.
The scales of justice need to be balanced. Both users groups need to be acknowledged.
You also need to blame the gov't. Why did you conveniently forget this demand?

You cannot be indifferent to the demands of gov't after being informed of the illegal policy and demands of the OSMV and the killing, slaughter, and maiming caused by gov't demands.
The funding that was shuffled around to pay for the illegal, phoney diabetic policy pays for all the spinal operations within a year and a half. So, in two years you will have an excess to buy more MRI and CT scanners, or pay private firms for doing scans.
The funding that was shuffled around to pay for all the other medical conditions the OSMV supposedly manages will pay for all the other wait list surgeries in less than a year and you will be in the Black in two years using only money in the system now. Don't forget, the newly discovered DME funds , (from 2006) come every year. How much, 50-100 million.

Minister, were these funds taken from the Ministry of Health? To do a phoney medical examination that offers no Good?
Minister, you now know the diabetic policy is only based upon a “view” and some boys having a pissing contest; therefore the demand is illegal. The other 100 medical conditions would be based upon the same “view” as the corruption surrounding my discrimination case informs us the OSMV would not have justified those conditions either.
Think of the money and doctors put back into the system just for canceling that illegal policy.
Now, go online to, “BC government, Ministries and Organizations,” and ask yourself how many of these organizations are making demands upon the medical system. Based upon a “view”? Based upon nothing. Are these people already visiting a doctor for their needs such as diabetics are? So, the examinations would be duplicated.
Don't forget, I visit the doctor 8 times to the 1 visit demanded by the OSMV. Or 20 times to the 1 mandatory visit for a private license as most diabetic drivers are.
So, how many times is this duplication going on with all those making demands?
Why is your office afraid to defend the medical system? Why don't you demand that users of the medical system such as the OSMV prove a real need and justify the need, especially when you now know I visit the doctor anyway.
You really need to confront the bullshiters with reality of democracy and the five points of engagement. They need to prove their demands are bona fide and the intervention offers good.

Why don't you blame the gov't for their demands. Why don't you stand up and defend the health care system from those gov't agencies that are using you for the fall guy, the scapegoat.
If you get fired at least you can inform your constituency that you were fired for taking care of their health. At least you would be able to sit as an independent and remind gov't of the Greed and Corruption. Your constituency will vote you in again for standing up.
What's the sense of having a universal health care system if you won't fight for it.

Lastly, Minister I know you are new to the position and look at the mess you have been given. But since 1999 when I was diagnosed with type 2 I believe you are the third or fourth Minister of Health. There is a new Superintendent of Motor Vehicles, the third Attorney General, the third or fourth Solicitor General, one who resigned under the allegation of corruption. It is the civil service that is corrupt not the elected officials?
You run the Ministry not some civil servants. If they cannot fulfill the demands of the Charter, the HR Code, and the MVA then they have no right to make demands of you. You tell them to fulfill the Five Points of Engagement before they make demands or tell you what to do. You fulfilled the Points in order to get to where you are now. Why haven't they.
If the civil servants and the lobbyists do not fulfill the instruments of democracy and the Points, the very things you fulfilled to get to where you are, tell them to take a long walk, just like Trudeau's walk in the snow, make the decision to change or leave.
If they do not like the Instruments of Democracy and their demands then tell them to quit, or retire early, or fire some of them. Buy them out so their corrupt influence is not in the background fighting your decision making, cut out their sick influence, just like doctors do with flesh eating disease. A disease that corrupts the whole body. Get ride of them.
Ask them if they are going to take any responsibility for the killing and slaughter or is it only on your head. Remember how many times they have blamed others for their behaviour in my inquiry and discrimination complaint. They care nothing for you.
Do the same to the lobbyists. You really do not owe them anything.
If you do not confront and stand up to those doing this to the medical system what will we have in the near future. What kind of job will you have for the next four years? A corrupt workplace knowing someone will stab you in the back every day.
You are the one that is going to loose your job as the health care system declines, not them. You will be transferred or voted out, not them. And then we will be stuck with them again. People that care nothing for democracy or the points of engagement, or social contracts, or due diligence or standards are not needed for advice.

You have a duty or obligation to confront all those making demands of the health care system.
If they get snarly, tell them to go see their mommy and she will give them some hot chocolate and they will feel better.

That's it.
*****************

On the very first page I said “U do not need to respond”. If I said “please respond” would you have read this? Of course you can respond. More important than me, you need to tell your friends and acquaintances.
If this happened to you what would you really do? It is coming to you.



The Notary stamp on the academic researcher's presentation is “Crystal Fersovich, Notary Public”.
The law firm stamp beside her stamp is “Armstrong Law, 8803 - 112 Street, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2C5”.



Lastly, who's the elephant in the room? Who is never mentioned? Who is not on the list of “Who and Why You are included”?
Yes. The Canadian Diabetes Association. For whatever reason they do not support me and yet my original discrimination complaint changed the DME fee payment scheme, saving needed funds for diabetics and the disabled.
The CDA relies upon the public for funds for its business and research, approximately 90%. There should be no doubt in anyone's mind that those that are doing this to me would loose the other 10%, the government funding. Retribution just like the game played with the doctors and what is to be paid.


Who and Why YOU are Included

Firstly, you are all witness. You are too many, now awake, to this corruption for Canada to say we didn't know.
Secondly, is 'what is happening to me' something new, the new societal cleansing? As humans we have ethnic cleansing based upon the construction of the Other through the use of misleading language, unproven negatives, bias, prejudice, hate, ignorance, disgust, contempt, and fear and loathing. There is not only 'the ostracizing of the Other from main steam life' but also deaths, including the innocent. Cleansing, based upon a “view” from some unknowns, but put into the public space as official government policy.
What we have with this policy is the construction the Other, the cleansing of the the Other as they have been labeled 'the killer”, the most horrific label ever attached to someone in order to drive them from main stream life. Which supposedly allows the perpetrators to treat the Other as they please; the lack of Charter Rights, Human Rights, Motor Vehicle Act Rights, the social contract of the Five Points of Engagement, and fair and equal treatment from those that practice law. With the culminating result of deaths, not so much of those cleansed, but of the innocent due to the Consequences of the cleansing.
Here we have something new, death of a different kind of 'innocent' due to the construction of the “Other”. We also have the cleansing of the diabetic into a Place within society, solely due to diabetes, due to some civil servants “view” and what they believe may happen in the future. It's written down, isn't it. It is government policy today.

Readers, diabetes does not care who it attacks; are you a closet diabetic, disabled, or influenced by such?
My human rights case changed who pays for the DME, your taxes through a money shuffle, through the MSP, to pay for the doctors billing, which is again falsely married to the policy to give it legitimacy, then the Solicitor General's office, which now pays for the DME. But where did it get the millions of tax dollars for the policy? From health care money as the DME is a demand upon the health care system?
The Ministry of Health wrote that approximately 9% of society is diabetic, add all the other conditions that are labeled disabled and what % of society does not need to pay for the exam anymore?
Look around at your family, the extended family, your work, your blackberry and its list of contacts and make a list the influence of those people upon your life. They do not now need to pay for the DME, they owe me. Therefore, you and they are in the Red to me. The only way to pay this debt off is to read and inform others.
If you do not know about their medical conditions you must ask why? Why don't you know about the folks with diabetes and other medical conditions. Fear. People have fear of what you get to know about them. They have fear of the above, fear of what is happening to me. Fear of retribution.
You betcha ya. Reader, the more we talk about medical conditions the less the fear has a hold upon us. The more we talk about the illegal social policy, bring it into the open or public space the more the discrimination is realized. This then confronts the gov't and its civil servants and its behind the scenes supporters as to “what the hell are “you” people doing and why?” Call for a Public Inquiry and a legal case with jury against those involved in this corruption.
Thanks for reading. Thanks for not being Indifferent.

My point is, Reader, if you decide not to inform your manager about this, place yourself in court and explain to the world why you decided to not pass this along for whom ever you read for.
Explain to your manager, who is sitting there holding her or his head and trying to cope with the unexpected and unexplained death of his or her child, or partner, or parent. Explain to you dead partner why. Explain to your kids why. Explain to you partner why they are forced to wait two years, now longer, laying in bed or a chair, on drugs, for bona fide surgery because medical funds are used to pay for the DME policy that has not been proved to be legal, or offer any Good.
Explain to yourself why you are indifferent to the killing, slaughter, and maiming coming from this illegal gov't policy.
Are the people that are doing this to me and you really the people that you want to be running our lives?
*

Adrian Dix, MLA, Room 201, Parliament Buildings, Victoria, BC, V8V 1X4
You get a copy as you confront the mismanagement and abuse of the health care system.
I also believe you have type 1 diabetes. I wrote your office about this a couple of years ago. You should be at war against these people doing this to you as a person, maybe a family person, a diabetic, and then a politician.
Your action against this policy will undoubtedly have those that hate you already attack your position. However, this will really demonstrate to the “people” in your Riding that you do work for them and take care of their health and welfare. All you will do is make the world a better place, for every one, not just a political party.
Never forget, those that wrote the Draft are nothing less than Fascists and Nazis. They hate Democratic Socialists and that is what you have declared yourself to be. They hide in our bureaucracy and protect themselves, something Fascists and Nazis do not offer the opposition. We don't know who wrote the Draft, the New Policy, and then the second Draft I received. We do not know who gave permission to send those documents to me as public policy. We do not know who decided to divert taxes to pay for the DME and not to those waiting for surgery. Who are these people? They are certainly not interested in your health or mine. They hide. We are very public. We are not hiding. You will expose corruption.
Call for a Public Inquiry. Support a RCMP investigation.


Aids Vancouver, 1107 Seymore St., Vancouver, BC, V6B 5S8
The government's Diabetic drivers policy constructs the diabetic as the Other, the pariah, as they do with people with HIV/AIDS. The change of the classification of the DME to a Medical Necessity is something arbitrary, not medical. It was done to cover up the horror of the policy and make my discrimination complaint go away. Maybe this example of the corruption associated with the use of Medical Necessity, therefore funding, may be of interest to your organization in their fight for Equality and Human Rights.
Secondly, diabetes does not care who it attacks. I was thinking that maybe your diabetic members or clients or visitors could write about the waste of tax dollars, which could be used for something worthwhile.
Maybe this letter could be posted for people to read.
Maybe this letter could be copied and placed in Emerge facilities for those who are so unfortunate as to be holding their heads in disbelief as to what emerge doctors have just informed them of. That the death was unexpected and unexplained; in reality explained by the constructed overcrowding, lack of funding, and misuse of funding for the illegal diabetic DME policy.
The unexpected and unexplained death is not now 'unexplained'.
Thanks for your time.


Anglican Church of Canada, 80 Haydon St., Toronto, ON, M4Y 3G2
You get a copy because you do have a code of ethics, to deal with the temporal, the hear and now. You also deal with Souls. Those souls that have no where to go as they went to emerge and died unexpectedly and unexplained. Unnecessary deaths due to Greed, Hate, and politics. Therefore they just hang around waiting for us to explain. I'd wait if I had the choice. You now have an explanation for those ghosts that have been created by those doing this to me.
What are the people doing this to me going to do you if you stand up? What is the old line, “You work for a higher authority than them.” You can challenge the very fiber of their being. Make them look at themselves. You have protection. Your whole being is to work for the needy.
Reverend, you have a lot of corruption to confront and a lot of souls to save. Ghosts to deal with.
(If the Anglican Church would pass this along to other denominations it would be appreciated; souls are souls.)


Anna Marie Tremonti, c/o CBC, The Current, P O Box 500, Station A, Toronto, ON, M5W 1E6
What can I say, you got guts. You take things on that have depth and history.
However, I don't believe you will be allowed to investigate this. But I need to write. It documents this within the public space.


Arvay Finlay Barristers, 1350 – 355 Burrard St., Vancouver, B. C., V6C 2G8
If the gov't and Attorney General's Supervising Counsel for Human Rights, Hunt, has done this to me to get its way, what have they done to your clients to get their way?
In reference to articles online about the Blackmore case and how it seems there are conflicts about what is offered by the A G's office and what you know; what has really been done to your client and to you?
The online reports of the Blackmore case mention lawyers from the A G's office. There is the A G, who is gone now, so we wait for a new one. However, the civil servants and their Supervisor are still there. We are stuck with the civil servants. The lawyers within the A G office that are referred to within the online articles do not do anything or offer anything without a review by the Supervising lawyer. Just as in my cases. Maybe you should be asking if Hunt was involved in the questions you have with these lawyers' presentations.
This reminds me of the breached contract I had with the OSMV. The Deputy SMV blamed the breach on some low level civil servant. Hunt was involved in that breach and phoney amendment.
The articles online seem to be doing the same. The lawyers are just low level civil servants, not allowed to take anything on and are told what to attack or defend and nothing goes 'out' without the Supervising lawyers consent.
Who ok'd all their work? That's the important thing. Supervisors get the big bucks, have the status, the trust, the power, and the prestige. Don't let him or her escape the responsibility and accountability that they have. Those two lawyers are just the scape goats or the fall guys, just as the lawyer with CLAS was used in the phoney amendment and the low level civil servant that was blamed for the breach; just fall guys or scapegoats for the Supervisors or Deputies. How the HRT was used as the scapegoat for OSMV stealing too many research articles.
It is all bullshit. They want the power and prestige then stand up and take responsibility and be accountable.
It is just another charade for lack of accountability. How low in the pecking order are those two lawyers in the A Gs office?

The online articles mention your firm is asking a judge for more time to investigate documents before your presentation of your case or something related. I believe this letter is past the due date but the judge should be given a copy of this for him or her to understand what is happening to me. Which may shed light on the conundrum the online articles write about concerning documents. If the above is being done to me with Hunt as 'on hands' , what is happening to your case with an 'at arms length' involvement but still directing?
As I wrote to the second civil servant involved in the statement that the “policy saves lives”, every case you and your partner have been involved in should be investigated for legitimacy.
Every case Hunt has been involved in should be reviewed and that includes your case, now you know what has happened and is happening to me and the online articles seem to be saying there are improprieties.


BLOC Quebecois, 3730, boul Cremazie Est, 4e etage, Montreal, Quebec, H2A 1B4
You get a copy as you represent a lot of people. The people that have done and are doing this to me have started with the diabetic, where do they go next? To the gene pool? To the culture, the color, to the language. Where do they go next Gilles Duceppe? Are they already in your Province just waiting to see if this policy can be slipped into practice in BC then into your province? How is the health care system in Quebec. How is the emerge? How is the surgery wait list?
Call for a Public Inquiry. Support a RCMP investigation.


B'Nai Brith Canada, 15 Hove St., Downsview, ON, M3H 4Y8
You get a copy because those that wrote the Draft and New Policy and those that reviewed it as a worthy gov't document, as gov't policy, and presented to the public, must be challenged. It defines Hate among other things.
They have tried to justify the policy because I might have a medical condition that may express in the future. This mindset, this group think, is more than Fascist, it has moved into the Nazi world. This behaviour is both economic and political.
It is said diabetes may have a gene. However, not all genes do express. So, these people are trying to slip this policy in through the back door using future medical conditions and a Human Rights Complaint. The gene science will be used. They will steal science again if not stood up to today.
As policy, the disabled and those that carry genes the Fascists and Nazi don't like are now in trouble, as policy has already been established and it wasn't contested in 2006-2009. Bullshit.
That charade will be 'just another lie' as I have been contesting it and confronting these people and their sick ideas for years.
Now it is registered with you. You are witness.
If a doctor was consulted and used to write this Hate policy he or she is nothing less than a Nazi doctor. One cannot write such stuff without being cognizant of what they are doing today and its meaning and cognizant of the consequences for the future.
Don't forget, as a diabetic, I am already Classified, Labeled, Given a Number, forced to take a medical examination that cannot do what it is alleged to be able to do, and will be tracked for the rest of my life. I have been called a killer by gov't. I have been mislead to believe there was a policy and it was justified, therefore legal, had the MVA wording changed to justify the OSMV policy, therefore the Solicitor Generals office, therefore the gov't; its falsifying documents isn't it? The settlement agreement was breached and a phoney amendment contrived, and has still not be renewed. The Policy concerning Diabetes was promised in 2006, then 2007, 2008 has gone by, and half of 2009. Now they have stolen scientific documents to justify there behaviour and when caught lied about it.
Do you really believe the so called new policy will really legally justify the policy against diabetic after you have read these pages. It is beyond these people. They are corrupt and yet see the diabetic as corrupt, and have constructed the diabetic as the Other. Once the Other, those doing this to me believe they can do whatever they want. They can't, this is still Canada, a Democratic society.
I'd appreciate you passing this to a Rabi who just loves reading about inequities, how they grow, and become twisted.
Call for a Public Inquiry.
Canada's NDP, 300-279 Laurier West, Ottawa, ON, K1P 5J9
You get a copy because the Fascists and Nazis doing this to me really hate your guts, the Democratic Socialist. The people doing this to me escalated this into the Federal place or space and Internationally. You are involved whether you like it or not.
You represent the Universal Health Care System. You now have the opportunity to right the wrongs that are pulling the health care system apart. Government must acknowledge its demands upon the health cares system and stop those based upon a “view” and that offer no Good.
Within the Public and Federal investigations and Reports about the health care system is the BC gov't acknowledged as an entity making demands upon the health care system? Of course not. They are hidden demands and no one knows why the General Practitioners are disappearing, emerge overcrowding, long surgery wait times, and the unexplained deaths emerge doctors are calling Press interviews for.
You have the opportunity of your political life, to correct the health care system. To take some Fascists and Nazis to task, using the Laws of our country, not changing law to get your way or disregarding the demands of the Charter, the HR Code, and the MVA, like they have.
You are not like them, don't turn yourself into them. Use the laws of Canada to force these people from government.
Call for a Public Inquiry.


Chief Coroner's Office, Terry Smith, Chief Coroner, Metrotower II, Suite 800-4720 Kingsway, Burnaby, BC, V5H 4N2
You get a copy because you have a real mandate to investigate death. The unexplained deaths need to be investigated. Not one unexplained death needs to be 'not investigated', they are never a closed file are they. The unexplained dead need to have someone speak for them in this temporal place; you are it in our society.
What has happened and still happening to me and the public is not some minor trail for you to follow but a roadway. My inquiry began in June/July 2002. The policy should have been canceled or put on hold as I challenged the OSMV with the consequences of the policy and the supposed consequences of diabetes.
Don't forget, a senior civil servant wrote that the policy saves lives. In other words you diabetic drivers are killers and this policy decreases this killing. It also means we are going to run this policy whether you like it or not, proof or no proof.
And then, a senior civil servant to him, writes it is appropriate to write the policy saves lives.
They see me and inform the public that I am a killer.
What is Good enough for them is Good enough for you and me.
That is why these unexplained deaths need to be thought of as killing and slaughter as the OSMV and those that write for and support this policy have consciously made the choice to run this policy knowing the harm. It's emergency facility 'road kill' isn't it? That's all these unexplained deaths are to these people doing this to me. Do you want to die in emerge due to this policy?
They know they will never be held responsible for their behaviour, as they will just blame it on gov't policy and low level civil servants.
Coroner, you need to document the number of deaths for all of us to see. Just like the Pig Farm killing. The dead were given their names back. There dignity was returned, other than just someone that disappeared, just some one that died unexpectedly, and unexplained, therefore unnecessary.
Your office is funded and managed by the Solicitor General's office. It is the gov't office that supposedly manages the OSMV, the people doing this to me. Then there is the Attorney General's office. Then there is the Ministry of Health. Then there is the unknowns the SMV refers to as the Internals and Externals that influence him.
Is your office really going to be allowed to run the investigation into the hundreds of unexplained deaths coming from the emerge facilities? Deaths from the arbitrary constructed long wait lists for bona fide surgery?
Lastly, in 2002, the beginning of my inquiry, diabetes was listed as 5% of society and turning into a epidemic. A couple of years ago the Ministry of Health stated we were up to 9%.
This means the demand upon doctors to fulfill the mandated OSMV phoney DME has also almost doubled.
This means the killing and slaughter in emerge has doubled. Is this why we now see doctors demanding Press interviews do try and explain there is something enormously wrong. They are Right. As Mr. Hari Pabbi and his family are Right. There is something wrong and they know it. (see below). They just have not experienced the discrimination and all the corrupt behaviour associated with that as I have.
This means when the epidemic of diabetes comes the blood and guts will be running out the doors of emerge.
This means when the million tourists come for the Olympics the blood and guts will be running out the doors of emerge.
How are you going to explain that Coroner? Responsibility will be dumped on you just as the gov't blames the public for getting sick, and the doctors not managing their patients, and the Health Authorities not managing their funds. How can they really respond to demands when they are fighting the demands of a policy that is not funded, the demand upon doctors hidden, and the policy illegal.
Also, after experiencing the fact that there is a two year wait for surgery, which should have been funded not the illegal, unjustified, and phoney DME, the deaths of those on the wait list must be investigated. These deaths, since at least 2006 when money was found from somewhere to justify the DME, and used to pay for some of the DME, must be investigated.
Lastly, I believe it was August 2007 there was a TV NEWS program, BCTV or Global, about a man that had just lost his wife in emerge. The death was listed as unexpected and unexplained. The TV screen showed the doctors as well as the man, the husband, who was crying and exclaiming the medical system was a failure. It isn't. The system works, it is the civil service that is the failure. It is the gov't Greed that is the failure. It is the Internals and Externals that are the failure.
The husband took his wife to emerge for life giving help. She was sent home; there was no Time for observation. There was no Time for Thinking about the observation. Space was needed.
It's as if her life was only given Andy Warhol's fifteen minutes of fame, fifteen minutes given by the gov't as Life and Time means a drain of tax funding; as if the doctors Time is equivalent to the fifteen minutes needed to change oil in my car.
Her condition became worse. Ambulance picked her up. They drove around for a while as the emerge was full. I believed she passed away in emerge. No reason but overcrowding. This is an excellent example of what I have confronted the OMSV with, the consequences of their illegal policy. The Consequences are not some correlation but a direct consequence. The above TV event is similar to the events concerning Mr. Sanjay Ablak's death according to the newspaper article. Mr. Ablak's surviving family knows there is something wrong, as the unknown man does, as do I. And now a lot of other people.
The unknown man needs to be contacted and a copy of this letter given to him. He needs all the information about the unexpected and unexplained death of his wife. We have no Right to deny him this information. He can make a decision of what to do.
Call for a Public Inquiry. Support a RCMP investigation.


Chinese Consulate – General, Vancouver, 3380 Granville St., Vancouver, BC, V6H 3K3
You get a copy because your country held the Olympics. Your country was criticized for lack of modern medicine, dependency upon herbal medicines, and medical practices that are thousands of years old. ?
Your country, as well as your athletes, other visiting athletes, tourists, and the Canadian public are led to believe our public health care system is reliable today. Ask a General Practitioner about wait-times and Forms or an emerge doctor about the killing and slaughter. And this is before the Games begin and a million people descend upon the Lower Mainland for an Olympic party. The increase in population will be an over-night thirty percent increase for the two week period. Don't forget, the Lower Mainland only has about three million people or less and a medical infrastructure for that population only and the gov't cannot manage that through Greed, Power, and a Turf war.
Maybe you could ask some questions about the health care scenario that has been painted for your athletes and visiting citizens.
In our country it is expected that if someone criticizes your health care system you have the right to criticize their health care system. It is just Good protocol, communicating that you took the time to really see our country for what it is.
Thank you for listening.


Canadian Institute for Health Information, 880 Douglas St., Suite 600, Victoria, BC, V8W 2B7
You get a copy due to your online 'goal' or 'aim'; “(CIHI) provides timely, accurate, and comparable information. Our data and reports inform health policies, support the effective delivery of health services and raise awareness among Canadians of the factors that contribute to good health.”
Write a report and inform the public about the corruption I have run into just because I have diabetes. How it harms my health being labeled a killer. Constructed as the Other, the pariah. How science has been stolen to justify the policy against diabetics. How health services are jeopardized due to the illegal policy. How the labeling of the policy to be a medial necessity is arbitrary. How the shuffling of money to support the illegal policy has just jeopardized my health, my life. How the gov't has decided to accept the constructed harm of the policy compared to the accidental harm of the supposed diabetic driver killers.



College of Physicians & Surgeons of BC, 400 – 858 Beatty St., Vancouver BC, V6B 1C1
You get a copy for all your doctors that are so busy they have not been able to work through what is happening to me. An emerge doctor does not do the DME. So, why should she or he know what I am experiencing and challenging.
Why should the G P know this is happening, their 'wait time' client list just lengthens; it is now 5-7 days for the clinic I visit.
They don't work in emerge.
As the emerge surgeons and doctors need to explain the deaths to the survivors they need something better than, “the death is unexpected and unexplained, we are sorry.”
A copy of this letter and the 'updated consequences' should be given to each and every survivor. As we are a Democratic society, and are autonomous beings, they then would have some information to help them to decide what they want to do. They have a Right to know the influences that impacted them. They can seek legal help if needed. If we do not inform the survivors we are denying them their rights to be informed and make decisions about their life. As doctors you are always informing the client or patient so they can make bona fide decisions. Why not in this instance?
Why should we leave the emerge doctor as the fall guy? Just another fall guy or scapegoat for the gov't and its corrupt illegal policy.
The emerge doctors need to stop being apologetic for something that is beyond their control and knowledge of.
A box of these letters should be in every emerge and given to the survivors as to what is really happening.
If something is not done now what is to happen with the diabetic epidemic? When it becomes 30 in 100 or 40 in 100? Not 5 in 100 or 9 in 100 as reported today.
The emerge will look like a MASH unit in the War in Iraq or Afghanistan, won't it. For the Office of the Superintendent of “Motor Vehicles” turf war. For the pissing contest of some macho boys associated with the car industry.
If something is not done now what is to happen when a million tourists arrive for the Olympics? This number is 25% of the BC population arriving for a two week party, party accidents, with the addition of all the regular medical conditions tourists have. And where do they go for medical care, as they are foreigners without a G P, they will go to the emerge. And if the gov't takes injured athletes to private care what does this say about the gov't management of health care and the respect for its own citizens.
The people that are doing this to me and you and society are not going to hate you any more if you stand up to them about this. They are your enemy now. You always confront bullies. Close your eyes if you think they are going to punch you, it will seem not so terrifying. If they don't kill ya, ya just get up and say it again, and again, and again. Let the public really know what is going on. Now that is Good universal health care. Turf wars and pissing contests are not health care.
This Olympic killing and slaughter will be a Good indicator for things to come when diabetes becomes epidemic. There will not be enough G P to do all the needed useless Forms little lone the number of clients that go to emerge due to the future 10-12 day wait for a G P. Clinics won't even be able to handle the mess.
Lastly, imagine the killing, slaughter, and maiming, due to the policy, and now add the wait-list horror show I was just introduced to. I said the hell with these jerks, I am not going to be a martyr for gov't corruption and the idiots in the auto industry, and the boys having a pissing contest. We were fortunate and had $10 000. What about those that don't and you see them after being in bed or a recliner for two years or more.
Reader, as doctors, you have an ethical or moral obligation to inform the public; to care for their health. The gov't may have forced you to do the DME, but I have not read anything forcing you to 'not inform' your clients about corruption that impacts their lives. Corruption endangers their health.
Don't forget, you are the fall guy or gal, or the scapegoat for the atrocity. No gov't workers will be fired. There will be not retribution as they will all say someone else did it, or we didn't know what the left hand was doing. All bullshit of course, but we don't fire civil servants and that is why this is out of hand and you are the fall guy.


CUPE, BC, #510 – 4940 Canada Way, Burnaby, BC, V5G 4T3
You get a copy because this phoney policy and its horrific consequences are happening in your hospitals, my hospital, your members and their families. How can you manage and work with management if the gov't does not acknowledge the demand, therefore the lack of funds and lack of management.
Secondly, I want to know why it took nineteen days to list me on a MRI list?
So, you are blamed for the problems in the health service and yet they really are constructed by gov't.
You are just another fall guy or scapegoat for the corrupt civil service and its illegal policy and if you stand up to them they are not going to hate you any less.
Weren't you the union they tried to break and hundreds of your members lost jobs, housing, pensions, incomes, etc. I bet those that tried to deny your members the right to hold their labor back did not loose their income, jobs, housing, etc. I bet those that took this to the Supreme Court of Canada did not need to pay for it. I bet we, as society, do not even know the names of the back room boys that decided to do this to minimum wage earners. I bet they all made over one hundred thousand a year.
These are probably the same corrupt people except this time the policy and Greed kills people.
You have nothing to loose this time, except your life.


Daily Show with Jon Stewart, C/O Viacom Inc., 1515 Broadway, New York, New York, 10036.
You get a copy because you talk about human rights. You talk about our universal medial system. You tear a large strip off those silly civil servants. You talk to the next generation and educate them not to just believe.
You get a copy because I am tired of Americans saying our health system does not work. It does work. As the above explains not much needs to be changed to make the wait lists disappear, make the civil servants disappear. The whole negative stab at the universal system is the wait lists. That is it. Nothing else is attacked. The problem does not need to cross the border to your 'new to arrive' universal health care system.
You get a copy because by including you I get lots of points from my kids.


Fifth Estate,
You get this because you do take the tough stuff on. However, I don't believe the CBC will be allowed to investigate this. This is just my need to document the horror of being a diabetic and a person that dares to have the audacity to challenge gov't and its corruption. You are witness.


Green Party of Canada, PO Box 997, Station B, Ottawa, ON, K1P 5R1
You get a copy because you represent the quiet Canadian striving for a healthy Canada. This policy is unhealthy and corrupt. Change will make Canada a healthier place. It will afford doctors the time they need to work with all those that have medical conditions due to the degradation of the environment or chemical or biological influences. You will support the cancellation of unjust and redundant medical exams and useless forms for real medicine for bona fide medical conditions. This policy is like flesh eating disease, it needs to be cut from the body for the body to survive.
Don't forget, the people that are doing this to me hate you also. You are a mirror that reflects back the horror they do.
Call a Public Inquiry.


Hari Pabbi, c/o Blue Bird Cabs Ltd, 2612 Quadra St., Victoria, BC, V8T 4E4
Mr. Pabbi gets a copy because it seems he has just experienced the consequences of the policy. His brother-in-law, Sanjay Ablak, passed away Dec 08, 2008. (Times Colonist, A4, December 16, 2008, “Slain man's family hires lawyer to probe records” and “Assault victim spent hours in hospital with head injury prior to diagnosis.)
Mr. Pabbi and family, I apologize for the language I have used, I do not mean to be insensitive to you. The people that are doing this to me need to be challenged with language that changes their home-made apple pie, fluffy puffy, mambe pambe, fuzzy wuzzy, oh we do no wrong, sterilized presentation of what is really happening.
What is happening is horrific and sadly to say your experience is what I have been challenging the gov't about, since 2002, concerning the unjustified policy and its consequences.
There is an 'indifference to human life' within this policy and the people that have contrived and support it. I have caught the gov't and they have contrived and endeavored with purpose to bury me in years of procrastination and litigation. And now they have stolen documents to justify their behaviour and its consequences and when caught they have lied.
And now I have had my personal health put in jeopardy, my life was threatened for no good reason.
I am so pleased that you also know there is something wrong and are not being indifferent to it. Life is too short to be indifferent.
The people that are doing this to me need to be in court explaining themselves to you and the public.
I hope you take the opportunity to do this. Just the process will help bring some kind of conclusion to an unexpected and unexplained death, if that is possible.
It used to be unexplained.
I believe you need to fight these people with their own language. Call them killers as they have me. File a charge of something more that death through indifference to human life with a $100 000 000 damage claim.
This will have immediate action compared to a Public Inquiry that will take year. The RCMP investigation into the theft of the scientific documents will take years as it in International in scope and involves numerous Consulates, or politics. Your charge will bring this whole matter out of the closet so to speak. My complaint was hidden within the Human Rights venue, an insignificant complaint, but in reality an insignificant complaint sitting on a monster; like the tip of the iceberg Well the berg has tipped over and now is public.
I believe your legal complaint will bring all this forward out into the light. I will be a benefit for society as as whole. It will force change in Canada. I may stop events such as you are experiencing.

Mr. Pabbi, I do not believe any of the people involved in this will ever be held accountable. This is a very sad thing to say as I have been hurt and you have been hurt. There are people doing this to me and you. They will hide behind, “they are only doing gov't business”, and the lawyers will say the same, “we are only doing the wishes of our clients”, and those unknowns that wrote the Draft will remain in the mud where they live, and those that changed the DME to be a medical necessity and shuffled money to pretend the DME and its consequences are legal will remain hidden or offer the same lies for protection. This constructs Blame on the emerge doctors and their health care teams, which is wrong.
A criminal charge may put the policy on hold immediately which will save lives, allow doctors to again practice doctoring, give immediate funds to those waiting for surgery, and reinstate the belief that one can go to emerge and get care within a reasonable time, which is not happening now. The damages will be headlines in the press. It may prompt an investigation into how this policy became so corrupt.
The only way to fight corruption is to make it public, to bring it into the light for all to see.
Best wishes.


International Olympic Committee, Chateau de Vidy, 1007 Lausanne, Switzerland
You get a copy because I imagine you have been guaranteed health care access to Emerge Facilities for not only the athletes but for all those employed and volunteering for the events.
The hospitals you will send the needy will be the busiest emerge hospitals in BC. The very hospitals that have the emerge doctors calling Conferences with the Press in order to inform the public about the horrific medical conditions within emerge. The doctors are talking about un-necessary deaths, the unexpected and unexplained deaths are so great doctors are making public statements about this horror because it is unacceptable and yet not rectified by government. Or as this letter states the killing, slaughter, and maiming of those by a social policy that actually causes the problem.
The 'emerge facility slaughter houses' will be waiting for a million visitors during the two week Olympic Games.
I think you should ask some very direct questions about health care as you are led to believe our Universal Heath Care System will be able to manage the daily demand of thousands of athletes and visitors to our country. This is important as foreigners, even with extra health care coverage, do not have access to a family doctor but are sent to emerge.

IOC, you really need to read this letter as the horrible medical conditions will impact the Paralympics also.
It is truly disgusting what is happening to our health care system and within the emerge facilities and if the doctors need to call Press conferences about the killing I do not believe the BC gov't has informed you of such. You will not be involved with the Canadian ideal of comfort and nicety, that all is well; apple pie and ice cream. The apples are rotten.
Reader, you never know until you take a bite of the pie and then it is not very nice. Your visit to the emerge is not going to be very nice.
You need to press the gov't for change as we only have so many doctors and they are filling out useless Forms and will be so during the Olympics.


Jesse Lobdell, c/o BC Civil Liberties Association, 550-1188 West Georgia St., Vancouver, BC, V6E 4A2
You get a copy because those that wrote the Draft and New Policy and those that reviewed it as a worthy gov't document presented as a public policy must be challenged. They have tried to justify the policy because I might have a medical condition that may express in the future. This mindset is more than Fascist, it has move into the Nazi world. It is said diabetes may have a gene. However, not all genes do express. So, these people are trying to slip this policy in through the back door. Once there the disabled and those that carry genes the Fascists and Nazis don't like are now in trouble, as policy has already been established and it wasn't contested in 2006-2009. Bullshit.
And that will be a lie as I have been contesting it and confronting these people and their sick ideas for years.
Now it is registered with you. You are witness.
This policy has not been justified by the Charter, the HR Code, and the MVA, nor the five Points. The things that I have experienced since challenging the gov't are not based upon anything legal or ethical. They are not done through ignorance, they know what they are doing and have a strategy. The woes of society cannot be managed through the attack upon the disabled or minorities. With nothing to justify their policy and behaviour we are forced to move to bigotry, disgust, bias, prejudice, contempt, and fear and loathing. All leading to Hate, which is trying to be justified by misinformation, lack of information, the language of fear, changing the wording MVA thus meaning, lies, and now the theft of scientific research and the lie the gov't didn't know the scope of the complaint. In other words, stealing a little bit is ok.
Call for a Public Inquiry. Support a RCMP investigation.


Lenard Krog, MLA, Room 201, Parliament Buildings, Victoria, BC, V8V 1X4
You get a copy because you represent my community. You get a copy because you are a lawyer. You get a copy because you confront the Attorney General's office; interesting stuff, eh. What has happened to me through the A G's office is corrupt, it is not acceptable.
You get a copy because there is a hospital in our area. It needs defending, as it is blamed for what ever problems the gov't blames it for. It is just another fall guy or scapegoat for those doing this to the medical system.
Call a Public Inquiry. Support a RCMP investigation.


Margaret Somerville, McGill University, McIntyre Building, 3655 Promenade Sir William Osler, Montreal, Quebec, H3G 1Y6
I read your book, The Ethical Imagination, and have heard you on Radio. You got guts. This needs to be talked about. People need to hear you and be allowed to think about what is really going on here. Other medical ethicists need to be informed, maybe just ethicists.

You are involved in Medical Ethics. You can teach your new doctors that they are not responsible for the unexpected and unexplained deaths and maiming, the killing and slaughter in Emerge facilities, as the gov't policy is. You have my permission to use all my writings in your classes or presentations of where we do not want to go and are there now.
Make your students take the Time to Think this through, as when they are emerge doctors they will not have the time as they will be trying to save lives and trying to deal with the killing and slaughter and the so called unexplained overcrowding. They also need the Time to observe, which overcrowding does not offer. They can take the Time to observe the images I have constructed for them, the pictures you can paint for them. You're the expert.
Don't forget, the emerge doctors do not do the DME, so they do not know it is in the background driving the overcrowding in emerge, the G P wait times, and the surgeries like mine requested through emerge not their GP. I was told to go to emerge if the pain and electrical storms moved to my groin and the emerge would take care of me. In other words I would skip to the front of the wait list. This is what is going on. Surgery through the emerge not the G P reference. I was also forced to manage my health other than through the G P reference, done due to the long wait-lists for surgery. How many suffers have been forced to lie for surgery to protect their health? How many do not have funds to go private health care, therefore make the lie or suffer for years? Do you think they should have lied or lie for surgery?
Thinking if I should lie for health care, and then making a decision one way or the other, is an ethical dilemma, isn't it. A moral dilemma is when I think and know I only have one way to go and that is not to lie no matter what the cost? Word games I think. I see ethical and moral as the same. How do we make the decision to lie or not as hundreds of people are making the decision not to lie? Why is the public put in this moral/ethical dilemma? Why don't they lie? When the gov't has shown no moral/ethical behaviour why is the public placed in such a position?
Why is the doctor placed in such a position? Is there really a decision doctors need to make concerning this policy? Why don't they inform every person on the surgery wait-lists just to lie and go to emerge to get immediate surgery? This may have saved months of pain and suffering and permanent damage due to the condition. Would their advice be unethical. They are taking care of their clients. They are challenging amoral behaviour coming from government, gov't policy, civil servants, and its supporters whom we do not know. Why is the public held morally/ethically responsible and not the gov't and its supporters?
Why did I have this argument with myself for private surgery as I did. At a cost of $10 000 and months of pain? Ironic isn't it. Seven years I have been working at this, to make the diabetic world a better place, to cure some of the infections within the health care system, and I am forced to go to private health care for my needs.
Doctors need to be tell the above, right at the beginning of the investigation of the medical condition all types of intervention available, I was not. It would allow me to make the decision as to how I will protect my health, as it is clear the corruption I have been confronted with is not interested in anyones health.
No, I will not be a martyr for the corrupt gov't and anti-diabetic lobby and all the people that do not know that this is going on, but demand everyone wait two years plus for spinal surgery because that is our universal health care system. When someone endangers your life you move on, they don't care about you, and you do not need to lick their boots or kiss their ass. You move on and let the world know about them.

I believe you are also involved in Law. I really do not know what to say to you about how I have been treated by these lawyers, with their positions of power, trust, status, and prestige.
So, how about a story within a story.
Actually, there is a lawyer's lawyer here. He is the lawyer from CLAS, Community Legal Assistance Society, who represented me in my first Human Rights Complaint. The phoney amendment I have referred to has him magically reappear, as he was legally gone the instant I signed the settlement agreement, he told me so.
Three months later the settlement was broken, the OSMV contacted me, I was out so I called back the next day. The Deputy Superintendent, Howie, asked for two more weeks to complete the Draft of the Policy. I gave her three. Nothing came. I complained and was informed by the Supervising lawyer for the A G's office, Hunt, that I only say we made an agreement. She is right, nothing was written. However, do you think she phoned me for tea.
It was promised as that is how one makes an amendment to a breached settlement agreement or you write a new one and send the other party a copy and the bargaining begins. Interesting eh. So, I cannot prove the OSMV broke another settlement agreement. I learned phone calls are really out there it proof is needed. Paper is needed.
In the mean time this lawyer, Hunt, and their counsel from Heenan Blaikie, Iyer, and Howie had played out their charade concerning this breach the day before and Howie never informed me the day after when we had our 'phone' call. We know this because a letter from Hunt concerning the breach does not inform us that Howie told me anything concerning the charade with CLAS. So, they called the lawyer from CLAS and left a message telling him something concerning the breach.
Now its my turn. Only you say you did such a thing Hunt. No one needs to believe you that you phoned CLAS. You never heard from him did you? Didn't you use him as a fall guy or scapegoat for not making an amendment or new settlement agreement. Why didn't your hired help, Iyer, phone him again? Surely Howie informed you of our phone call the next day? That would only be due diligence on her part as you are representing her, the OSMV. Are we to just believe Howie phoned to blame the breached settlement agreement upon so lowly civil servant and that is it? Doesn't it need to be renewed? Oh ya, that would have demanded a real and bona fide policy to be produced by the winter of 2006, as there was not one before and it is now July 2009 and still no policy. Oh ya, there wasn't an old policy being tweaked for me and my complaint. What kind of ethic or moral behaviour is this? I was mislead about the policy.
Also, Iyer faxed Hunt and Howie to tell them the charade had been played out.
The trouble is they never tried to get hold of CLAS again. Never. Where is due diligence? Faxing someone once and not having a response for a breached gov't settlement agreement is not good enough.
So, the gov't has continued on as if an amendment to the breached settlement has been legalized with my involvement and signed. How can that be? I was never contacted about it or involved in it.
This is precedent law you are reading. Your new students need to know that they can write an amendment to a breached settlement agreement and not involve the second person in the contract, me.
Somerville, do you train your lawyers never to try and contact someone more than once, especially if they represent someone that has just broken a contract between the two parties. Of course not. There is due diligence needed. The due diligence is on the side of the people that constructed the settlement agreement, presented it, bargained for it, accepted it, and then broke it. You phone more than once or actually write something and mail it as Hunt has just enlightened us that phone calls are no good.
Oh, by the way, the Deputy was my official contact if something went wrong, not CLAS. That is why Howie, the Deputy of Superintendent of Motor Vehicles phoned me, not counsel for the OSMV, as Iyer was not on retainer or hired at that time. If she was on retainer or hired she would have called me, as she would have then been the third party, which means her client does not contact the other party for any reason. At least that is what counsel demanded of me during complaint #5791. I contacted Howie to be a witness in Discrimination complaint #5791 and was reprimanded for contacting her. So, Hunt and Iyer can do it to me but when I make the mistake I'm reprimanded?
It really is unequal treatment isn't it. Just more discrimination. Just more of the charade. Just more of the, 'we can treat you as we like as you are the Other'.
So, what went on. The CLAS lawyer probably received the phone message and fax. But, he knew he did not have the legal right to represent me. He did not respond. He did not speak for me when my back was turned.
He's the lawyer we want. The lawyer who is trustworthy and does not act when he knows he does not have the right to act no matter who is making the call. This lawyer is not above the law. Interesting, eh. Nice fellow.
This lawyer is the lawyer's lawyer as he does not act when peoples backs are turned.
And who made the fax and phone call to him? The Supervising lawyer for the Attorney General's office and a high priced lawyer from Heenan Blaikie. How's that for power and status to make someone jump. He didn't jump. He knows he did not have the legal right to represent me or the right to speak for me concerning anything. He's the lawyer's lawyer.
So, the phoney amendment was done with a charade, a smokescreen, and fall guy. The smokescreen is the play with the phone call and fax as these lawyers are not naïve bystanders here and knew CLAS did not represent me and knew he would not return calls or sanction the demands without his previous clients re-hiring and that takes months as it is CLAS. Part two of the smokescreen is the charade that this phoney contact makes some kind of amendment legal and all is well in Alice in Wonderland. Trust us Jenkins, we will take care of you and your rights.
The fall guy is the lawyer, as he is blamed for not returning calls, so the OSMV under guidance from the A G office just carried on without him and his input. He should have contacted them and he didn't so we, Hunt, Iyer, and Howie, just carried on because if he did not like what we were doing he would have contacted Iyer.
Sorry, just another charade within a charade. It is just more Bullshit.
So, what do we have? An amendment made without one of the two principals, me. This must be legal president for not only BC, Canada, but for the contract world.
Now gov't can break contracts, play games, and make amendments without the other participants knowing of such and carry on as nothing ever happened.
Bullshit. This charade defines corruption.
Somerville, you work through what is wrong here. I'll send all the papers to you.

Somerville, I only discovered this charade had been played two months after it happened. Only because I complained to the new Superintendent about the second breach. Interesting eh. A real serendipitous event, a once in a lifetime event.
The new Superintendent passed my complaint on to legal. And who responded? Hunt. The very person who contrived the charade. Too funny.
In her response she wrote that only I say the Deputy and I made an amendment to the breach. In other words you cannot prove anything, so go away. Any yet, with the other hand she bases her phoney amendment and charade upon a phone call and fax to CLAS? Her phone call is real? Prove it Hunt. Her phone call is truth? Her phone call must be accepted as she is a lawyer? A civil servant? The Supervising lawyer for human rights in the A G's office. It must be accepted because she is a Matriarchal Mama?
My call is not acceptable as I am the diabetic. Diabetics can be fat. Obese, things society hates. Some diabetics use needles, another thing society hates. The gov't has written I am a killer? The pariah? The Other?
Oh ya. We all need to bow down to Hunt and just believe. Why didn't you do this in paper Hunt? Fulfill the demands of the Charter, the HR Code, and the MVA Hunt and them maybe you will have some credibility. Phone calls do not do it.
Hunt, do you actually have proof the Fax arrived and was given to the lawyer from CLAS? What happens if he was on holiday for a month? Or in Prince George for a case, that was booked for weeks?
Oh ya. We should all bow down and just believe. Fulfill the demands of the Charter, the HR Code, and the MVA Hunt and them maybe you will have some credibility. Faxes do not do it.

After reading her response I called the HRT to see if they were back into the settlement agreement as CLAS had been brought back in. The answer was no. The BC Human Rights Coalition said no. (They forward complaints to CLAS.) CLAS said no. So how is it that Iyer, counsel from H B, did not know that CLAS was not involved? She is a human rights lawyer. She worked full time for the HRT. Taught law. How is it that Hunt did not know CLAS was not involved? The OSMV has had numerous human rights cases lodged against it and accepted. She is the A G's Supervisor for human rights.
This begs the question,
“Did Iyer and Hunt know the CLAS lawyer was not in town when they contrived and played out the phoney amendment?”
HRT cases are online and counsel is listed. Iyer worked for the HRT and could have knowledge of the lawyer's activities.
We need to ask these questions as it is not believable that these lawyers are naïve bystanders. We do not need to believe they do not understand that there is due diligence to be played out on their behalf. We do not need to believe they did not know the lawyer would not respond. With Hunt and Iyer's legal experience we do not need to believe they did not know CLAS had legally retired the day of the signing, just as the HRT was, as Iyer was, as Hunt was. We do not need to pretend these lawyers did not know there was no policy and the charade is only used to mislead, in order to protect the OSMV from commitment to something they do not have, an original policy and proof to justify the policy, therefore no chance to have a policy in three months from the settlement agreement signing or the additional three weeks I gave the Deputy. We do not need to believe these lawyers did not know this. We do not need to pretend we are dumb and do not see the charade that was played out for what it is.
Additionally, the BC Law Society accepted my complaint about this charade, made as list of what to review from my complaint, which I agreed to. However, it did not respond to my questions about why I was never informed about this charade and stuff like the above. When I asked for the complaint to be heard by their committee, because only one lawyer evaluated the complaint, to answer this question, I was informed the complained was put under a no access blanket. Great stuff. Right out of Comedy hour on TV.
Lastly, I believe I am entitled to be legally informed that the OSMV had hired counsel to deal with the breach. I was informed with the first complaint, the Representative complaint, and the second discrimination complaint. This whole matter went down, the charade, and I didn't even know it had been done and it went down the day before the Deputy and I talked on the phone. She had been involved in the charade and had not informed me what she had done to me the day previously. No where in their correspondence to me does the OSMV inform me they hired counsel to represent them with the breached settlement agreement. Why not? The counsel was not on retainer. The breach happened three months after the settlement agreement was signed. As stated above, if Iyer was on retainer she would have contacted me but she didn't. Although she played out the charade with CLAS. Why did Howie phone me? Why didn't Iyer phone me? She was the lawyer therefore she should have called me as she was then the third party.
To say the least the Trust between lawyer and public was broken. Since then some really interesting stuff has happened hasn't it. Caught but not penalized leads to other stuff, behaviour worsens.
Somerville, there is a corrupt mindset and group think that really needs to be confronted. We challenge it by instructing the new generation of where not to go and what not to do. There really has been a Trust that has been broken here. Both a legal Trust that I believe is between lawyers and clients and a social contract Trust. I should be able to sit down and read a lawyer's presentation with the absolute guarantee that all is bona fide. The trust is not there and that is why I knew something was wrong with the demand for the scope change, and I am right. That is why I knew something was wrong with the presentation of the early dismiss, and I am right.
I'll send you my correspondence so you can write a book, or play, or manuscript for your students to character play. It would be interesting to see their defense or offense to justify the story you write.
If you just write the story no one will believe you that things like this happen. You'll have proof. You can change the names to protect the guilty.
So, is the gov't allowed to run a policy that is not legal, is conscious of the horrific consequences, offers no Good, and protects it with misinformation, lack of information, stolen property, and lies?
Where is the morality of such a policy? What kind of ethical behaviour is demonstrated by all those involved in this policy? What kind of people are these people, their ethical/moral behaviour?
Are they amoral? These people are making decisions about how we want to live. We want to live like them? Is our democratic society really able to function, as a healthy society, under their lies and corruption? Under the denial of the killing and slaughter? Under the lack of respect for the instruments of democracy? The absolute breach of Trust with our legal system; the Attorney General's office, the Solicitor General's office, private practice, and the BC law society.
And this goes on with these people and Canadians are being killed in Afghanistan for Democracy, Human Rights, and fair play through Law. They really are something these people that are doing this to me, therefore society.
Teach your students where not to go. They don't need to.
So how is it that I am labeled a killer by a senior civil servant and when challenged his senior writes the statement is acceptable? How is it that no policy has ever been written. How is it that a senior civil servant broke a settlement agreement and blamed it on some minor civil servant and that the blame is acceptable? How is it that the future is allowed to penalize me today? How is it that I was never informed of my legal rights? How is it that lawyers presented stolen documents? How is it that lawyers presented a lie for the gov't.
Is this a new social cleansing?
Is this the new genocide?
Is this the new crime against humanity?
Interesting stuff, eh.


Mark Steyn, c/o Maclean's, 11th Floor, One Mount Pleasant Rd., Toronto, ON, M4Y 2Y5
You get a copy because you made me laugh. After my surgery of May 22, I was catching up on life and read your article on Ignatieff and another one about the same time, something about you confronting your manager.?
Anyway, you reminded me of a movie about thirty years ago when a reporter ran from a building screaming, “I can't stand it anymore.” It was great. Something like that. Anyway, it was great and I was recovering and feeling good. I had forgotten what it was like to be in this body without pain. To laugh. It is wonderful. It makes the things we confront seem so insignificant.
I have also felt the same about diabetes as it never stops and is a chronic disease. I just scream, “I can't stand it anymore”. Of course I do. I have also felt the same about the corruption I have come face to face with. But you are right, I need to add indifference to the nasty stuff out there.
Yes, I agree, its the indifference that we confront, in my case the indifference of those doing the deeds and those that I have previously written that have not confronted the gov't and civil servants. It's the indifference to what is really happening that you are telling society and me to wake up to. You are right.
I've written Maclean's editorial page and other Press, their health page, the legal page, the science page all concerning the stuff I write about here. Not even a 'got your mail' or 'are you sure this is happening?' or 'we'll get back to you.' Nothing. It is not there. This guy did not write.
You refer to the horrors of life, its the horror that is too much to deal with, the old gov't genocide, the indifference to it, the indifference to standards, the indifference to the missing women of the pig farm horror, the indifference, and the new gov't horror that is taking place with the killing and slaughter in emerge and surgery wait lists.
Thanks again for the scream. It was wonderful to hear a voice out there.


Medical Services Plan, Health Insurance Plan, Ministry of Health Services, PO Box 9035, Stn Prov Govt, Victoria, V8W 9E3
You get a copy because you pay for the DME, which in turn, due to this marriage with the Solicitor General's phoney policy, gives justification to the policy, to give the policy legitimacy. Which, of course it is not legitimate, nor bona fide, nor justified. Nor does it offer any Good. How do you justify the charade to deceive the public. How do you explain the change of the DME from something that was classified as a non-medical necessity to something that is now a medical necessity in order for you to pay for it? Magic.
How many other non necessary things are now a necessity? How deep does the arbitrariness run?
Why do you support an illegal, unjustified demand upon the medical system that has horrific consequences.
How can you let yourself be used to justify an illegal gov't policy?
How can you let yourself be used to justify an illegal policy that offers no Good?


Michael Ignatieff, Liberal Party of Canada, 81 Metcalfe St., Suite 400, Ottawa, ON, K1P 5R1
What to say to you. What to say. You seem to want to define Canada. That's ok, but its like others have before us, what is the saying, 'it like trying to catch the wind', isn't it. Its like the wind on the Pacific ocean, you cannot catch it but you better try to understand it. To say the least the wind changes the ocean, and the ocean is moving whether the wind is calm or out of hand. It is always different but the same. It is always there, the ocean , moving. The wind is a distraction. The sameness is that it really is indifferent, and we just take it for granted, and give it a matriarchal status. Make it something it is not, something supposedly trusting. Out there it is the indifference that will kill you.
You are trying to catch the wind, values covered up with stuff. There is indifference here too. Indifference to values will kill you. Isn't your hunt for the wind just values covered up by waves and foam or leaves and land dust?
Ignatieff, there are places out there that you do not want to be within, there are horrors out there. There are horrors on land too and this is one of them. This is the horror we don't want to be within, ever, and the BC gov't has taken us into it. They have no right to put the health of anyone at risk, written what they have written about me, do what they have done to me, and now endanger my health, my life, due to some “view” and a pissing contest.
They have taken us into the horror and have lost control and are now doing anything to justify their behaviour before they sink. That is why the gov't is using the Charter to justify its actions but in reality not fulfilling the Charter demands, its used as a threat, just another charade really.
They totally disregard the demands of the HR Code and yet have previous experience in front to the HRT and been found wanting; it has no excuse for not fulfilling the demands of the HR Code before it acts out its wants, which really should be needs.
It has changed the wording of the MVA to gets its way.
It has stolen research and lied when found out, broke the settlement agreement and contrived a charade to pretend all is well and have not fulfilled their part of the settlement agreement, they have failed to acknowledge the consequences of their actions and yet base the policy upon the consequences of diabetes, they have turned the diabetic into the pariah, writing that the diabetic is a killer, and denying bona fide surgical operations because they need the money to run the corrupt diabetic policy. How nuts and corrupt are these people?
Ignatieff, the above sets you up for values. Like the wind and waves they are always there. What values do we want? That is what you seem to be really asking Professor. Professor, don't go and get all esoteric with me. 85% of Canadians do not go to University, its just the nature of that Place. Four out of ten adults are functioning illiterate and yet look at the small business' they run and the jobs they are successful at. Stay with values to define the Place we have and want.
Get your staff to pull a list of Values off the internet. Make them read this letter and the 'updated consequences' as many times as needed to work through how many of the values that make us today have been corrupted by the gov't itself. We really put value on lies? We value theft? We value writing that diabetics are killers? That means I'm taking your basic Right to Life away. How many values are corrupted with just that lie. We value deception? We value breached gov't contracts? We value the lies and corruption within the Draft? We value indifference? We value indifference to human life?
To find out what we are and want to be is important; make a list, or use the Value list. We begin by knowing what we do not want to be. This is most important as the list on the page, of what we are, what is left after we cross out so many values the gov't has corrupted itself. This is what you seem to be wanting to say, to say you have values for the public to follow; their values as well as yours. We need to list them to know where we are today; Point 5 of the Five Points of Engagement.
We do not want to be where we are now with this human rights complaint and the corruption and killing and slaughter due to a phoney policy that has just now had 174 stolen research articles presented to justify the policy and consequences.
Ignatieff, you need to stand up and state this is not where we want to be and it will make it a lot easier to understand where we really want to go. The values are there. They are just covered up by the wind and those waves and foam.
Once a decision is made of what we do not want to be it is easier to cull the other stuff out too. Each cull makes Canada a better place to be. That is why we cannot define it now, as we do not know where we are yet, as the change will only come when we have had enough of the killing and slaughter and maiming of our own citizens through corrupt gov't policy.
If you really want to be here, in the public place, be part of here in the now, here for the future, you need to stand up, not only to the BC Liberals but the civil service too. Wally Opal was voted out, a new A G is to be found. He or she will arrive in a corrupt place. That's the trouble isn't it. We change the elected officials but the corruption is still there. The wrong people have left. Welcome to the real Canada.
Call a Public Inquiry. Support a RCMP investigation.


Office of the Auditor General of British Columbia, 8 Bastion Square, Victoria, B. C., V8V 1X4
I wrote your office a few years ago about this matter. Since then things have changed, I ask your office to investigate the matter of funding for this policy as it offers No Good, and the gov't has just presented stolen research to justify the policy, has still not proved the DME can do anything, the horrific consequences are not acknowledged, and lastly as I visit the doctor 8-1 or 20-1 compared to the visits to the doctor the gov't demands of me, there really is no need for the policy scientifically, medically, or legally.
As the millions of tax dollars are used to pay for this illegal medical examination and policy, there is a drain upon the medical system that offers no Good. The funding should be used for Good. If funds could be found for the DME now paid by gov't, to make the demand upon the medical system, the funds should be used to really fund bona fide and justified demands upon the health care system, such as the needed spinal surgery I just needed.
Auditor, No documents need to be stolen to prove the needed spinal surgery I needed. No turning someone into a pariah. No broken settlement agreements. No changing of laws to get my way. Lastly, there is definitely Good. Inform the public of the abuse of tax dollars for an illegal policy that harms and offers no Good.
Call for a Public Inquiry.


Office of the Premier of BC, Rm 156, Parliament Buildings, Victoria, BC, V8V 1X4
What do I say to you. The Deputy of the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles knew the policy had not been legally justified in 2002 when I began my inquiry. She has known the policy harms. She has blamed the breach of the settlement agreement on some underling. She should have been fired for the lack of responsibility concerning any of these points. We have had the corrupt Draft and the lie about the scope of the second discrimination complaint and the theft of 174 scientific research articles to justify the policy and its horrific consequences.
Premier, you don't have anyone to blame. You are on top of the pyramid. You just got voted in for another four years.
I don't care if you knew about this before or it has been hidden from you. It is what you do today. You need to cancel the policy for all the reasons given above and below and in the 'updated consequences'.
You need to fire some people as there are values wronged and corruption concerning this policy.
Premier, the gov't does not change the MVA statutes to get their way.
You do not breach a settlement agreement you initiated and play the phoney amendment as if all is well. If the gov't presents a document saying this is the amendment to the breach, it is just another lie. They haven't sent me a copy as it would be illegal and phoney and using the mail for such would be mail fraud wouldn't it.
You don't steal scientific research and present it as if it were legal, with permission to use, to justify an illegal social policy and its horrific consequences. You do not use a Notary and a Law firm from Alberta to pretend the Notary's stamp justifies the presentation of the research., especially when each page of the research listed is stamped, “For internal distribution only”. In other words the owner of the listed scientific research, the newly hired academic researcher by the OSMV, hired to put some kind of drivers policy together for the OSMV, knows the demands of privacy with research and has protected herself and yet presented the material against me. This exemplifies lies and corruption. This new employee needs firing too.

Who am I? I'm the diabetic that has the audacity to challenge the OSMV and the macho car boys, the folks with too much testosterone, in the Motor Vehicles office and the Solicitor General's office. All involved in this corruption surrounding the phoney policy should be fired.
Also, the stolen documents were presented under the influence of status, trust, power, and prestige through the Attorney General's office as it hired Heenan Blaikie, who rides around on the laurels of Trudeau and Chretien; therefore the Charter.
The buck stops with the Supervising lawyer in the A G office, she manages the lawyers and their presentations. Especially, as she, as government, has given private counsel directions. There is no way she did not know about the presentation of the material. She has been involved with my complaints since the beginning. It is not believable she did not know they were presenting protected science. If she didn't, why didn't she? She is the Supervising lawyer.
She was also involved in the phoney amendment. She was also involved in the HRT Representative complaint I lodged.
She has just played another charade and I have caught them again. The difference now is that the charade now includes multiple provinces and numerous countries. The consequences of the lawyers and the OSMV actions now involve the RCMP, Consulates, and scientific journals from around the world.
Premier your staff have done this, not me.

Premier, whether you like it our not you are now involved. This illegal policy is horrific to me, socially and emotionally, and it has just jeopardized my personal health, my life. How would you like to be written of as a killer by government? The consequences are also horrific to society.
What you do now will be your political legacy. A lifetime of work to be scandalized due to civil servants and their lust for Greed and Power, a turf war.
What you do now will protect the athletes in the Olympics.
What you do now will protect the thousands of needy tourists at the Olympics.
What you do now will protect thousands of people from the monsters in your government.
What are you going to do with the Fascists and Nazis that wrote the Draft?

Premier, if there were any Good Will in those involved they would have at least put the policy on hold, because they knew it had not been legally justified and they knew of the harm. They chose not to. They chose not to and have misled me, stonewalled, breached a gov't contract, played a charade concerning that, forgot my legal rights to be informed, and now stolen research to justify the policy and when caught lied to protect themselves.
Secondly, this must be a Pissing Contest between the Solicitor General's office and other offices to see how much power and money they can get. How else can they explain the lack of legal process, lack of respect for the Charter, the HR Code, and the MVA, the killing and slaughter in emerge, and the Fascist and Nazi thinking and presentation of the Draft, other than some insane game boys play in order to get their way; the pissing contest rules the day.
So, it seems the S G measures success in death, the emerge killing and slaughter, and deaths from the surgery wait list, and the Ministry of Health measures life, sometimes. Sometimes as it really should have been demanding from all those that make demands upon the health care system to really prove a need and make sure those people being forced to visit the doctor are not visiting the doctor in the first place. Such as with me visiting the doctor 8-1 or 20-1 in the first instance. Make sure the Intervention is bona fide and offers Good.
These people that are doing this policy to me and society have no Good Will, little lone legal good. We need good will to participate in this spectacle of life.
Mulroney's public inquiry was about $350 000 and the belief that the Prime Minister's office may have been slighted.
This corruptions involves 100's of $1 000 000, your office, the A G, the S G, the Min of Health, a Notary and law firm from Alberta, and now the Prime Minister's office due to the International scope of what the OSMV, the A G, and the S G did. I don't think Mulroney's behaviour killed anyone. I haven't seen anyone on TV saying their loved ones have just died unexpectedly and the cause unknown due to his behaviour or policies.

Sad to say Premier, the civil service is in deep corruption concerning this and that is why this needs to be made public through a Public Inquiry and in front of a judge and jury.
As previously noted the two year plus wait for spinal surgery is not needed, as those involved in demanding taxes be transferred to the S Gs to pay for the DME endangered my health, my life, have not justified the policy to begin with. It is based upon nothing legal or bona fide. Greed and Power are not bona fide reasons to justify a policy that harms, leaving those that need real, bona fide medical intervention left to die and live in pain and agony. All involved should be fired as it could not be run any worse.
You fire the leaders and those that see the opportunity for advancement will willingly talk to the RCMP. The others that have not been fired because their influence was behind the scenes will turn on each other as that is their nature. The RCMP will just watch this play, not a charade this time, about characters turning on each other. No water boarding needed here as the fear of being held responsible will drive them forward. (water boarding in reference to my uncle, pp 4 and 23 ) The lower level civil servants, those that are abused by those that are corrupt, that do not owe other civil servants, will mange the vacant positions just fine. Trust and values will be established again, at least for a while. Until you retire anyways, eh.
Call a Public Inquiry.


Office of the Prime Minister, 80 Wellington St., Ottawa, ON, K1A 6M8
What do I say to you? When I began my initial inquiry into what was happening to me I wrote Federal health offices only to be informed that they could do nothing as the Provinces manage the health care funds.
Things have changed. Your office is now involved whether it likes it or not. The BC OSMV brought a Notary and law firm from Alberta into the complaint, her signature was a power play, supposed to justify the use of the 174 scientific articles that are protected by Copyright, Intellectual Property Rights, and Intent of Use. She doesn't have the power; it is just another charade. Permission Forms are needed by most or all users of the scientific research. There is also research from Canada and the International body. So, as Canadians we will need to explain why we have stolen research to justify a social policy that has been run for years and never been legally justified.

Secondly, we will need to explain why we did so knowing the horrific consequences, using their protected research as bona fide justification for the killing, slaughter, and maiming going on due to this policy. Even if the research is not formally protected one informs the owners if it is to be used to make social policy, it is called due diligence of respect for the owners.
The people that have done this are out of control. Federal agencies are now involved. I've written the RCMP and a number of Consulates as they represent the countries that own the Intellectual Property. They represent the researchers and owners of the research that cannot afford to challenge a gov't office. I have made the playing field a little more equal, I hope. There should be no misgivings that the OSMV and those doing this to me know how hard it would be for international copyright owners to fight a gov't. It is just part of the corruption and twisted strategy of the BC gov't to not take any responsibility for the killing and slaughter resulting from the DME policy and stolen research.
The people doing this to me have forced Federal agencies to challenge their corruption, as it has now impacted all of Canada and numerous countries.
Prime Minister, this was not your problem as all provinces demand autonomy to manage themselves in many things.
However, this diabetic policy is not just provincial, it is a national policy, probably with differences in each province, but based upon the same kind of sick, unaccountable, irresponsible behaviour.
How many people in Canada have been killed by this policy? Emerge Overcrowding is in every province.
The Olympics will bring you to BC. I also have a wife and three kids. They just got their tickets. I just made the decision not to visit the emerge for medical care as visiting a clinic is less harmful and the medical care is quicker and less dangerous. That is a terrible thing to have just 'had' to work through. As a family we have talked about this horror in emerge settings. The kids have cell phones and Blackberry's and as visitors to the Lower Mainland they can find a clinic, which will be safer and healthier that the overcrowded emerge.
There will be a million tourists for two or three weeks. What is that going to do the emerge as that is where most of those needy tourists will go for every day health occurrences, for their needs from their partying, and those needs just from the higher density of population and health issues that arise from that new density.
All this happening to me and society just from the fear and loathing and hate of the diabetic and the disabled.
The people doing this to me represent Canada? They represent the troops in Afghanistan, a war for Democracy?
Interesting stuff, eh.
Call for a Public Inquiry. Support a RCMP investigation.


Peter Mansbridge, C/O CBC, Box 14 000 Station A, Toronto, ON, M5W 1E6
You get a copy because you like reading. Also you know a lot of people. Sadly, I have written the CBC about this matter over the past years and there was no response. So, I don't expect the CBC, dependent upon my taxes, to investigate the hand that feeds it. Mansbridge, we as a society, did not want to get involved with the women that disappeared over the years in downtown east Vancouver as I think we knew something horrific was afoot and they were the poor and unknown; not worthy of the time and money. Well this is also horrific. These emerge deaths, people looking for life giving help, are also unknown. Those unknowns that have died needlessly in emerge, due to gov't Greed and Discrimination also need to have their story told.


Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Vancouver, 150 Robson St., Vancouver, BC, V6B 2A7
You get a copy because you do have a code of ethics, to deal with the temporal, the hear and now. You also deal with Souls. Those souls that have no where to go as they went to emerge and died unexpectedly and unexplained. Unnecessary deaths due to hate and politics. Therefore, they just hang around waiting for us to explain. I'd wait if I had the choice. You now have an explanation for those ghosts that have been created by those doing this to me.
What are the people doing this to me going to do you if you stand up? You work for a higher authority than them. You can challenge the very fiber of their being. Make them look at themselves.
Father, you have a lot of corruption to confront and a lot of souls to save. A lot of ghosts to help move on.
RCMP, Public Affairs & Communications Services, Headquarters Building, 1200 Vanier Parkway, Ottawa, ON K1A 0R2
This letter can be added to my material sent to you, Canada Post date, May 08, 2009; about Copyright misuse, Intellectual Property Rights misuse (theft) and Intent of Use misuse.
The funds that were shuffled to pay for the DME have not been justified by any means. Their use reinforces the discrimination associated with diabetes, instigated and supported through gov't policy. These funds are available for use for a policy that has not been justified by the Charter, the HR Code, and the MVA nor does it offer any Good. The tax dollars have been diverted to satiate the Greed within the Solicitor General's office, of Power and Money, and maybe Hate of the diabetic; it is a mindset to do anything at any cost to keep those diabetics in their place and hide the consequences.
This shuffle of funds for the policy endangered my life. If those funds had been used for a legal and useful demand upon the medical system the list for operations would have disappeared by 2007 and I could have had an operation right away. Instead the tax dollars were used for an illegal social policy that is known to cause harm.
They deliberately chose a path of harm, knowing the consequences of that choice. Their behaviour endangered my life. The people that support and administer this policy have no right to endanger my life for their own Greed and Hate. None.
There is an indifference to human life, concerning the shuffle of funds for the DME, that needs to be investigated.
I want the RCMP to charge the OSMV and those involved in shuffling tax dollars with endangering my life. This shuffle really is married to the illegal policy, which you are investigating due to the stolen research. How many people on the surgery wait list have died waiting? Are there suicides? How much maiming?

The Draft and its use of future medical conditions to justify the policy against the diabetic defines Hate. The people that wrote this hate and the people the reviewed the Draft as to what they wanted to convey to the public are not stupid, not insane, but corrupt.
There is hate in the Draft language.
RCMP you can investigate the 'endanger to life' aspect of this case as to weather the S G's and all those that support this phoney illegal policy should be charged with such a thing.
Hate also needs to be investigated.
Just add these and any other legal terms that are appropriate to the list of all the other things the gov't and the Internal and Externals should be charged with. (The SMV has referred to Internals and Externals as forces driving his office. However, they are they also need to be held accountable for the actions concerning their involvement in this matter. They cannot make decisions of influence without accountability.)
Call for a Public Inquiry.


W-Five, CTV, PO Box 9, Station O, Toronto, ON, M4A 2M9
You get a copy because for some reason I don't think I have written you lately. You are also a witness.
Jim Beatty, Vancouver or Victoria, did a report on MRI. I had to go to the private MRI. I should not have had to. This human rights complaint is now national and the killing in emerge may be also; depends on how your provincial gov't manages the diabetic driver and other disabilities. If it is managed like BC imagine the killing. Maybe this is why the press does not address this problem, the killing and slaughter in emerge is so great we cannot deal with it, especially coming from our own gov't; the Pig Farm was horrible enough and now we have something that is worse. Even one death is worse as it is gov't driven and they know the policy harms. It is a constructed and conscious harm. It is not allowed but here it is.


Vikki Huntington, MLA, Parliament Buildings, Victoria, BC, V8V 1X4
You get a copy because you are new to gov't. It was said that the people of your riding should not vote for you because Independents never make policy, therefore no good or something. Wasn't that nice.
I am not a politician. Just a worker bee that votes. As you will see above I have made policy change. Some change and some change promised and not delivered.
The demands of the Charter, the HR Code, and the MVA are there to use and support your needs. The Five Points of Engagement were used by you to get where you are, maybe understood as different names, but used.
And as you will read those that I am fighting pretend to use them. Don't let their bullshit sway you.
Good luck.


VIHA Executive Office, 1952 Bay St., Victoria, BC, V8R 1J8
You get a copy because this phoney policy and its horrific consequences are happening in your hospitals, my hospitals. How can you manage and work with management if the gov't does not acknowledge the demand, therefore the lack of funds and lack of acknowledgment of 'where the heck have the doctors disappeared to'?
Secondly, I want to know why it took nineteen days to list me on a MRI list? That is insane.
When I discovered that I phoned Comox Valley MRI had an MRI within five working days, it was reviewed by a Radiologist, had medical tests done as well as an ECG, all faxed to the private health care, Specialist Referral Clinic, had a consult with a surgeon and then an anesthesiologist, was operated on, standing up in five hours, back home the next day, walking around and functioning without pain in less time that it took for your system to inform me in had to wait four months for an MRI. What the hell is going on?
Lastly, you are blamed for the problems in the health service, the above, and yet they really are constructed by gov't. You are just another fall guy or scapegoat used by the gov't to blame its problems on. There is a presentation of 'who gives a shit' for health care and due diligence coming from the A G's office, the S G's office, and the OSMV as long as they get their way. Challenge them, as they are bullies, and need to be outed and they will not hate you any less. They do not have the right to turn me into a pariah, to be the sacrificial goat, the killer, for their woes. They do not have the right to endanger my health, my life, by redirecting funds for the policy, away from bona fide surgery needs.
Support a Public Inquiry as you will not be detested any more than you are treated now.




United States of America

Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of the Dept of Health & Human Resources, 200 Independence Ave., SW, Washington, DC, 20201
You get a copy because you are trying to understand how to correct the problems of Universal Health Care Systems and incorporate them into your society.
When you review the documents Canada has sent you about our health care system will you really find the demands of gov't? There should be numerous, such as demands from Health and Welfare, the Airlines business, Marine, Coast Guard, and Ferry traffic. Go to BC government, Ministries & Organizations and make your own list of which ones will be making demands upon the medical system. And this is only for Provincial not Federal.
Things we take for granted but put demands not only on the medical financial resources but human resources also. So, you are not informed about the drivers policy because the DME is paid by the clients but the doctor resource is diminished and not accounted for in our ideas of the number of doctors available to manage the publics need in the universal health care system. (Work through the 'upgraded consequences' to see how many “equivalent” doctors are needed to fill the DME and the time needed to complete the Form. Then add the 100 or so other medical conditions that are supposed to be managed by the OSMV and then add all the other kinds of examinations from different ministries or gov't organizations you have listed and what happens? You need to see this as a percentage of the General Practitioner Population available. Does this lead to 25% - 35% or 40% of the G P Population taken out of service to fill Forms out?)
How are you going to introduce a new system when this demand on doctors is not acknowledged even if the examinations are paid for by the public.
This is why G P are leaving the business and medical students are becoming surgeons. No stupid forms, just doctoring. Don't forget, doctors in BC are mandated by gov't to do the DME and Form. Mandated because the gov't knows the doctor's Code of Ethics prevents them from doing harm to clients. Pretty sick stuff this mandated event concerning doctors. It is not the doctors that are not trustworthy, to tell their clients not to drive due to medications or their medical condition but the politicians, the senior civil servants, those that are supporting the policy, and those not acknowledging the consequences.

Secretary of H H R, your staff need to review the gov't documents concerning our medical system to see how many demands from gov't are listed. If you do not find things such as the above you know you have been lied to.
If they are not listed that means they are not acknowledged, not funded, and not managed. It also means the human resources, the doctors, the demand upon doctors are not acknowledged, not funded, and not managed. We are led to believe the 4500 G P in BC are there for bona fide health care demands, but in reality there may be as many as 600 - 1000 G P taken out of service just for the DME and Form. Therefore, the demands upon the medical system, as a whole, are never realized, not by the public anyway and those not associated with the DME, such as emerge doctors and medical care managers.
There is an absence of wholeness presented by gov't to hide the true demands of the policy and similar unjustified demands.
If your staff do not come to terms with this your endeavors will be fruitless and the enemies of universal health care will have won the day just through misinformation on our part.
Our health care works except for the unjustified demands of gov't and its corruption.


Don't forget, with a universal health care system there are only two user groups, the public and the gov't. The public is defined as what has been classified as a “medical necessity”. Someone's nose job is not a medical necessity and not covered. So, the private medical practice enterprise will still be intact. They are not being challenged here or with your ideas of health care.
Secondly, when you read reports concerning the health care system the public is always blamed for the shortfalls, as if I wanted a damaged spinal cord, nerves, and discs.
We are blamed for wanting new physical science tools, MRI, etc, new care for the elderly and kids, the new drugs, etc etc.
These are all evaluated, funded, and managed.
And yet, where are the demands of gov't. Not acknowledged, therefore not evaluated, funded or managed.
Both demands need to be open, public, and reviewed, not just the publics demands.
Again, Secretary, you really need to get your staff to list the demands from gov't to construct a complete list of demands from gov't and if they are publicly acknowledged, therefore funded and managed.
You need to read my 'updated consequences' and understand the demand and consequences to build a wholeness not just and understanding based upon pieces from here and there. To understand that this diabetes policy is only one phoney demand upon the health care system.
This begs the question of how many different Ministries are making demands upon the health care system and are not acknowledging the demand in order that there can be management.
You will need to deal with the denial of wrong here; the public and the doctors are not the wrong.
Don't ever forget, I visit the doctor 8-1 or 20-1, so why am I forced to undergo the DME?
Don't ever forget, the gov't has not ever informed the public that I do so.

Don't forget, the $5 000 000 used to pay the doctors for the phoney DME, which does no Good, could be used to fund all the people waiting for spinal surgery; therefore eliminating the nay sayers and their correct presentation that I did need to go to private health care to survive, because there is a two year plus wait list for bona fide surgery. There is no doubt the consequences of my medical condition would endanger my life if I had waited the two years plus. Just laying down for ten days is supposed to be like adding fifteen years of life to your life. What would happen to me after two years?
Secretary, what the nay sayers do not know is that I was forced to do so because of the government's illegal demands and Greed for power and status is what really endangered my health. Or do they know? Is this why they are so bold and outspoken? The Canadian gov't will not confront them because the lies and harm will come forth?

In contrast to the DME, the spinal operation is a real, bona fide, justified, need. Not just some want.
There is real Good realized from the operation.
Operations relieve pain and suffering, it stops the progress of negative health, what was beginning to happen to my inner organs was horrific. What would they be like in two years if I had waited. What is happening to those other 650 folks waiting for two years. Permanent damage because the car industry civil servants are making unjustified medical demands and everyone but me is afraid to challenge them.
The operations put people back to work, etc, etc.
Canceling the policy eliminates the negative status associated with those that are diabetic, the disabled, it will eliminate the statements that diabetics are killers, the construction of the “Other”, the construction of the diabetic as pariah within society. That is healthy for society just in itself.
Don't forget the Office of the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles is all about cars and their operation. Just more testosterone driven boys with their toys and not giving a shit about the consequences of their actions.

*
If you would like a copy of the Draft and my response to it you are welcome to it. You need to know how deep the prejudice and misinformation is if you are to confront the nay sayers.

If you would like a copy of the academic researchers presentation with the 174 research articles used to justify the policy and my deconstruction and criticism of it, you are welcome to it. You will be confronting this kind of presentation also.

These are important as my deconstruction of the two presentations will help your non-scientific staff to see how to confront the stuff from science that will used against you.
Don't forget, my deconstruction of the academics presentation was so good the gov't lied and said they misunderstood the scope of the complaint. It was just damage control.
Interesting, eh. I think in the USA you would say, Interesting, huh.

The wealth in Canada is just astounding and the abuse of the health care system by gov't is corrupt. I have been fighting not only for diabetics but the health care system that takes care of me and all those I do not know. It is worth it. It makes Canada a better place for all. And now I have just experienced another negative consequence of the policy, which endangered my life.
The same harmful consequences and corruption will apply to your country if you do not take heed today.
I hope it works for you, as it really does work here, except for the government's hidden demands and those consequences.
*


9% of society is diabetic. That means three of you readers are diabetic. How many disabled?
When You apply the Six Degrees of Separation how many people do you know that have experienced the consequences of the policy?
Surely, you cannot be Indifferent to those that you know?

Regards,

Dave Jenkins