90 pp, Oct 3, 2012, concerning Government Lies, Crimes Against Humanity, and the Brink of Genocide

Reader, this letter was sent to Government as they did not fulfill their obligations to me and the BC Human Rights Tribunal.  They promised to send me the "BC 2010 Guide in Determining Fitness to Drive”, to deconstruct and if I found it wanting I could lodge another Discrimination Complaint.  They are now using to BC 2010 Guide in Determining Fitness to Drive”, to make demands of disabled drivers knowing they have not had Guide evaluated for legality, need, validity, bona fide (ness) and acknowledgement and acceptance of the horrific consequences the Guide produces.  When I inquired in 2010 about why I had not recieved a copy the Government had their lawyers lie the Guide was not ready.  I waited again, as I had been waiting since late 2006, my first Human Rights Discrimination Complaint where the Gov't promised a Policy Paper.  That's right.  I recently discovered the guide had been published and was being used and the Gov't was lying to the Public about its legality and bona fide (ness).  It was also now being used to attack Senior Drivers without any proof there is a bona fide Need and that the Cognitive Examination if valid.  It isn't, it's an Unsanctioned Human Experiment and those implementing it know this.  Therefore the corrupt Solictor General and those in the Office of the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles  are running a "Crime Against  Humanity" and the first Senior they kill through the illegal experiment takes their behaviour and Unsanctioned Human Experiment into the Classification of "Genocide".
Reader, the Government did not voluntarily write this Guide through Good Will, but was forced to do so through my BC Human Rights Discrimination Complaint of 2004 - 2006.  Before 2006, the Driver Policies were based upon some Senior Public Servants point of "view", not law.  They did not fulfill the demands of the Charter, the Human Rights Code, nor the demands of the Motor Vehicle Act.  That's right, they did not even fulfill the demands of the Government Office they work in, which means they broke their Oath of Office and the Trust between the Government and the Public.  Both jail terms.
Let me be very clear here the Solicitor General's Office and its Office of the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles knows these policies are illegal and harm.  As staff member, a real medical doctor, wrote they knew of the Harm; she then left the Ministry of Health and turned up the Mayor of Vancouver's Office during the Olympics.  What is the harm?  It's the Overcrowding in Emerge that sees an inordinate number of deaths and maiming the Emerge doctors hold NEWS conferences about.  It's about the 50% of clients in Emerge that should not be there.  They're there because the wait times to see a General Practitioner are to long as they are too busy filling out useless and illegal forms for the Solicitor General's Office and the OSMV.
Now you know why the Politicians and Senior Public Servants lie about what they are doing, falsify documents, lie to the BC HRT and me, lie to the Public, lie to the Press, did not send me the Guide for Rerview and last year attacked me for questioning Steve Martin, the SMV, where he falsified documents to cancel my license. 
Bullies and liars don't like people that expose and challenge them.  The following letter explains the above, the Crime Against Humanity, and the Unsanctioned Human Experiments.  And as Martin has escalated his perverted behaviour with his personal attack and assault and denigration of my character this letter and this blog are here just in case he kills me.

  




August 23, 2012


Dave Jenkins

3107 Tanglewood Way

Nanaimo, BC, V9T 5A5

www.2diabetes.blogspot.com



Ministry of Public Safety and Solicitor General

Honourable Shirley Bond, Solicitor General.

PO Box 9053 Stn Prov Govt

Victoria, BC, V8W 9J7



Office of the Premier

Christy Clark, Premier,

P O Box 9041, Stn Prov Gov't,

Victoria, B C, V8W 9E1



and others on p 85;













British Columbia's

Crime Against Humanity

and how

Solicitor General Bond

with Martin, the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles

with Howie, the Deputy SMV

and Dobbs, their “academic researcher”

have brought us to the

Brink of Genocide















I write to defend myself, as Martin, from above, recently Attacked and Assaulted me, falsified documents to Harm me Personally, covered up through his Government position. Done because I exposed his Lies, Bias, Hate, Bigotry, Discrimination, Prejudice, his Falsification of Documents, and Illegal policies to ICBC. These Government Policies have horrific consequences, such as being Responsible for the Overcrowding in Emerge and the Inordinate number of unexplained deaths; his Office accidentally acknowledged this. Reader, if your illegal behaviour kills hundreds of people yearly, “What are you?”, and “Why should I be quiet about it?” and “Why have the RCMP tried to cover – up these illegal policies and their horrific consequences?”.

All this means Martin has Breached his Oath of Office and Trust between the Government and Public to say the least.

The letter is long, but the above Crimes Against Humanity need to be explained and that takes time and paper.



Lastly, I believe Martin and his Thugs will kill me for this letter, or the RCMP will accidentally electrocute me to death, so this letter is a Review of what S G Bond, Martin, their Gangster Buddies, and the RCMP are really doing.

August 23, 2012



Introduction



Dear Reader;

When you have a Chronic Disease as I have, type 2 diabetes, an incurable disease, a disease that only worsens over time, but a disease that can be managed, and One has his Charter Rights and Freedoms and Human Rights forfeited, due to this, by incompetent, cowardly, and corrupt Politicians and absolutely corrupt Senior Public Servants and you end up in the Spectacle of a “Crime Against Humanity” you need to keep a smile on your face and in your heart, as they're the Monsters of the Human Species, not you.



My point is, what you're about to read really has and is happening to me, therefore you.

The people I mention really are doing what they're doing, so just give your head a shake and read on with a smile on your face, as it really is Horrible and Premier Clark, Solicitor General Bond, Superintendent of Motor Vehicles, Martin, Deputy SMV, Howie, their “academic researcher”, Dobbs, and their corrupt unknown supporter's really have deep psychological mental health issues to do what they're doing.

Secondly, they know the diabetic, or disabled driving policies are illegal and are responsible for the Overcrowding in Emerge Facilities, which kills approximately 120 people a year.

Third, my BC Human Rights Discrimination Complaints forced the Government to write the “BC 2010 Guide in Determining Fitness to Drive”, as the killing policies were based upon their “view” of life, not law. They were supposed to send me the Guide and when nothing came I inquired, I was told to go away by their lawyers, and I have only accidentally discovered the Guide was made public in 2010.

This letter is about the Corruption, Treason, Homicide, and Crime Against Humanity that drove that decision to not send me the Guide.



My point is, last year I again exposed the illegal policy and its killing and maiming in Emerge and Martin, in his twisted, perverted, bigoted, prejudicial, and hateful “view” of life decided to escalate his deviant behaviour to launch a Personal attack and assault upon me; to teach me who's Boss, not the Charter, the HR Code and the Motor Vehicle Act.

He falsified documents, lied about me, had people track me, denigrated my character, cancelled my license indefinitely, and when all was sorted out, Martin was not fired. He used his Government position to attack me personally, lying he was doing Government business; this is serious escalation of his perverted criminal behaviour and another breach of Oath of Office.



Martin increased his “hands off criminality”, of attacking and harming the disabled, the diabetic in my instance, to a “hands on attack and assault” to make me back off, to stop exposing him, and I still haven't backed off.

My point is, Martin's next personal attack will be to kill me, so I write, and you get this.

**



Fiction and Non – Fiction



Fiction needs to make sense, if it is to believed,

whereas, Non – Fiction, truth, does not make sense, as it really is too bizarre at times.



Reader, this is Non – Fiction. The people are real, what they are doing is real, and the consequences of their actions are real.



And I do NOT need to be quiet about these people and what they're doing.

















Introduction, p 2

Opening, pp 4 – 5

Short Version, pp 6 – 11

p 6 the “BC 2010 Guide in Determining Fitness to Drive”

p 6 There are only Two User Groups of our UHCS; the Public and the Government

p 7 Seniors Driving Policy; the “DriveAble Assessment Policy”

p 8 If Martin or His Thugs kill me you need to know these things

p 9 View of Life

p 11 RCMP involvement



Long Version, pp 12 – 80

p 12 Mental Health Issues

p 13 Honour?

p 15 Time; the Benefit of

p 16 “Deviant behaviour increases to Seniors” & “Leading up to Crimes Against Humanity”

p 18 Dobbs' Persuasive writing

p 19 A Crime Against Humanity leading to Democide and Genocide; the Illegal Disabled Drivers' Policy

p 19 “DriveAble Assessment Policy”

p 21 S G Bond, you, and your corrupt Senior Public Servants and Nazi researchers have taken us to the Brink of Genocide

p 21 Background to expose the above Corruption “... the supremacy of God and the rule of law:...”

p 22 Canada's “death penalty” was cancelled, so why are these gov't employees allowed to knowingly kill?

p 23 The Guide

p 24 Knowing your Enemy

p 25 Howie's Hate Crime

p 26 Why was I supposed to receive a copy of the “BC 2010 Guide in Determining Fitness to Drive?

p 28 Pride and Gratification through the Guide

p 29 Old Way of Thinking

p 29 The new Senior drivers policy, “DriveAble Assessment Policy”

p 31 Information needed to carry on, just in case I am killed for defending Canada and those that are vulnerable

“Definitions of Democide and Crimes Against Humanity”

p 32 What's with the RCMP?

p 34 The New Horrors of Our Age

p 35 Why continue with the illegal drivers' policy?

p 37 I should explain the term Bullshit; the triple Bs, or BBB

p 39 Corruption and Connections to me, BCHRT, ICBC, and the RCMP

p 41 Corruption and the past seven or eight Solicitor General's in as many years

p 42 The Five Steps of Engagement mentioned above

p 43 “Questions concerning the Auditor General” & “Crimes Against Humanity”

p 44 Solicitor General Bond

p 45 The Guide Again

p 47 “Bonnie M Dobbs, the Government's Nazi academic researcher? Or is it Schizophrenia? or Dementia?or Borderline Personality Disorder or some other Mental Health condition?” & “University of Alberta needs to strip Dobbs of all her positions” & “The Sections of Dobbs' BCHRT Presentation” & “Stuff defined” & “Scale of Permission Forms”

p 65 Human Experiments, The Social Psychological Experiments; Milgram Experiment, Jane Elliott's diversity training, and the Stanford Prison Experiment. Or More appropriately understood as “Group – Think of Wrong – Thinking”

p 67 Schizophrenia, Dementia, and Borderline Personality Disorder

p 70 The illegal “DriveAble Assessment Policy” concerning Seniors

p 71 There is no such thing as a Small Human Experiment, therefore No Management and Code of Ethics

p 72 The Work Needed before Human Experiments

p 74 “Matriarchal Mommas (Gang)” & “Cost of the illegal “DriveAble Assessment Policy”

p 76 “Nazis and research” & “Reimbursement of Senior Fees”

p 79 Solicitor General Bond's Lies about Licensing; “Seniors' Brink of Genocide”

p 81 Closing Review

p 82 OSMV policy cancellations

p 83 Satiation

p 85 Those Contacted and Why

Opening, pp 4 – 5





Dear Honourable Solicitor General Bond;



Dear Readers;

As mentioned above, this lengthy letter has been written to defend myself, as last year at this time, I was attacked and assaulted and had my character denigrated, my license cancelled indefinitely, which injured my Dignity and Self – Respect for exposing Steve Martin's, Superintendent of Motor Vehicles, SMV, corruption, lying, falsifying documents, bullying, breach of Oath of Office, breach of Trust, and Homicide to ICBC. This has left me worrying that Martin will kill me this time for challenging him again.

Challenging him again for breaking the Law, his Oath of Office, the Trust between Senior Public Servants and the Public, and running a Crime Against Humanity, which kills hundreds of people a year in Overcrowded Emerge Facilities and those waiting for surgery. He knows all this, which means he's habituated to killing at arms length, but this personal assault and attack exemplifies he's escalated his perverted deviant behaviour to another level. When Martin falsified documents to cancel my license he stated he had people following me, therefore he knows my habits and I'll just be road kill to him. Reader, you don't think Martin has severe Mental Health issues?

His boss, Solicitor General Bond, knows all this and has covered it up, as has Premier Clark.

My point is, by the time you read this letter about Corruption and Homicide you'll come to understand why I worry, as you should too.

*

I write because I've just learned the “BC 2010 Guide in Determining Fitness to Drive”, has been published. I was guaranteed I would receive the Guide when it was published. I should have received it in 2010.

Reader, it was my BC Human Rights Discrimination Complaints that forced Government, Martin and Howie, to write a Document fulfilling the demands of the Charter, the Human Rights Code, and the Motor Vehicle Act, if they were to run these policies; as these policies were only based upon their sick, twisted, traitorous, perverted “view” of life and that's not Good enough or legal. My inquiry began in 2002 – 2004. There were three BC Human Rights Discrimination Complaints lodged concerning this.

My point is, always remember they know their illegal policy kills and they've never put it on hold until justified.

I was promised by Government, and through the BCHRT Decision, that I would get a copy of the Guide, as soon as it was available. This promise was made, as the BCHRT said it could not evaluate the Policy as there was no Policy Paper to evaluate, so they needed to wait for a Policy Paper to Evaluate. So the promise was made that I could again Deconstruct the Government's Policy Papers they were putting forward to finally legalize their policy; in other words they were to fulfill the demands of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, Section 1, the Human Rights Code, Section 8, and the Motor Vehicle Act, Sections 25 and 29.

Martin and Howie hired an “academic researcher”, Bonnie Dobbs, to justify the diabetic policy by any means; she made a presentation in my 2008 BC Human Rights Tribunal Discrimination Complaint, BCHRT. She stole Scientific Research and other documents, placed them in an Affidavit, swore an Oath all was legal, and all the while lying she had the Legal Right to use them, to make a foreign country's Social Policy legal. After I Deconstructed this presentation and exposed the theft and lies for it was, it was withdrawn.

She's now involved in the Un – Sanctioned Human Experiment upon Senior Drivers; an absolute corrupt “academic researcher” attacking Seniors, with the permission of dysfunctional people like S G Bond, Martin, and Howie.

My point is, if S G Bond, Martin, Howie, and Dobbs had justified the Disabled Drivers' Policy through the Guide, more specifically, the type 2 diabetic policy, as that's the disease I have, they would have been Proud of their Seminal Work and sent me a copy of the Guide, as soon as it was published. They didn't fulfill their obligations to the person that had forced them to legally justify their positions in the Public Service, as they have not justify the Policy. Dobbs did not send me the Guide, to the person that's responsible for her employment by Government, because she absolutely knows there is no need or bona fide reason for the Policies. They hid their Guide, as they know it's just more noise, lies, and Bullshit from Dobbs.

My point is, when ones behaviour, and this is illegal behaviour, kills and maims and one doesn't change their behaviour the consequences of that behaviour are not considered an Accident anymore. It's a Class of Homicide. This is Homicide, on a Grand Scale, at least 120 people a year. Emerge Doctors hold NEWS conferences about this phenomenon; it's Government driven and Government knows this and the Press is afraid to report it. The RCMP also covered this up, but for different reasons. (The Fact of Government Killing was used to Blackmail the Government into a twenty year contract.)

My point is, now you know why Martin attacked me and Dobbs stole research and why they stonewall about this policy.

My point is, these policies can be explained as a Crime Against Humanity, because the Policy against the Disabled is illegal, kills and maims the naïve bystander, continuously denigrates a vulnerable Class of People, (the disabled driver for me which is 10% of society), knowingly harms their Dignity and Self – Respect, and invalidates their Charter Rights and Freedoms and Human Rights.

I do not need to be quiet about these corrupt people, their illegal policy, and their killing; their Crime Against Humanity.

*

Also, this new attack upon Senior Drivers by S G Bond, Martin, Howie, and their Nazi “academic researcher”, Dobbs, has taken us, British Columbians, therefore Canada, to the Brink of Genocide.

This Psychological Human Experiment, or Cognitive Experiment, (the psychological term has been used to contrive and mislead that the Human Experiment is bona fide). It should be called a “Brain and Mind Experiment”, as it has Not been Sanctioned by any Board of Governance and their Code of Ethics, which must be done for any Human Experiment.

There is no such thing as a “small Human Experiment”, so that the World Rules and Regulations concerning Human Experiments can be waived. After the Nazis Human Experiments of World War II were discovered new Rules and Regulations were composed to stop things like this before they got out of hand. This is an Un – Sanctioned Human Experiment and S G Bond, Martin, Howie, and their thief and liar “academic researcher”, Dobbs, and her husband know this. Dobbs' BCHRT Presentation and Curriculum Vitae were contrived to mislead, as is the language concerning the Human Experiment upon Seniors. They have no Right to take us to the Brink of Genocide.



My point is, I do not need to be quiet about this Crime Against Humanity; the stocking, hunting, and Mind Experiments upon Seniors, which with the first death of a Senior will be Genocide. Remember, Dobbs studies Seniors and knows how to harm them.

*

Important

To understand what World Rules and Regulations are, concerning Human Experiments, go to the “BC Generations Project”, where you'll find “BC Generations Project Protocol”, 28 pp and the “Privacy Impact Assessment”, 43 pp.

This is a modern, long term Human Experiment, done to collect data on people's health, to help our understanding of cancers and chronic diseases like diabetes. It's voluntary and Governed by a Board and a Code of Ethics.



My point is, S G Bond and Dobbs offered nothing to justify the Senior Driving Policy, while being interviewed by Global

B C TV, February 8, 2012. Dobbs only offered condescension, sarcasm, and sourness because she's Incompetent, Cowardly, and Corrupt.

Secondly, the Disabled Driver's Policy is also a long term collection of data concerning Humans, but it's forced upon the Public, not something volunteered, and not Governed by a Board and Code of Ethics, and no one has informed me why they're collecting this data.

My point is, it's not only an illegal policy that kills but it's not a Sanctioned Human Experiment.

Third, the Senior Driver's Policy is also a collection of data, again forced upon the Public, not something volunteered, and not Governed by a Board and Code of Ethics.

*

The Real World of Canada

Reader, Canada really is run by the Charter of Rights and Freedoms; it's not run by arbitrary decisions coming from Politicians and Senior Public Servants.

Canada's Charter of Rights and Freedoms states we're governed by defined Rules and Regulations;

“Where Canada is founded upon principles that recognize the supremacy of God and the rule of law: ”



(From the Constitutional Act, 1982, Part 1. Minister of Supply and Services Canada, 1987, ISBN 0-662-55569-4)



My point is, S G Bond, Martin, Howie, Dobbs and their colleagues have put themselves above the Laws of Canada and the Supremacy of God; above laws, humanity and our ideas of God.

**

















Short Version, pp 6 – 11



Reader, think Scale, Big Ideas, and Connections for Context and Understanding.



The “BC 2010 Guide in Determining Fitness to Drive”.

Reader, as stated above this Guide is due to my Inquiries and BCHRT Discrimination Complaints, it's not being done through Good Will of the Solicitor General's Office and the Office Superintendent of Motor Vehicles, Steve Martin, SMV, and Lisa Howie, his Deputy. Do not believe the lies they will offer, as to “The Why” they are only now trying to justify Government Social Policy; justification as if that will justify the Harm, the killing and maiming.

My Discrimination complaints, that forced this Guide, were lodged as the policy was/is based upon Martin and Howie “view” of life. As they have never fulfilled the demands of the Charter, the HR Code, and the MVA, therefore their “view” of life is not worth following. Their “view” of life is corrupt.

Question, “Do you really want to follow people that run illegal policy that kills and maims?”

That's right, they have not even fulfilled the demands of the MVA, the department of government they run. As a matter of fact the S G Office, and now S G Bond, Martin, and Howie have stonewalled and procrastinated continuously since my initial 2002 – 2004 Inquiry into this illegal policy and its harm.

Question, “Why have they procrastinated and lied?”

Answer, “I don't know, as I'm not corrupt, a traitor, and a mass murderer. I'm the one exposing them and their lies, theft, twisted and perverted “view” of life, their bullying, thuggery, treason, and murder.

*

Think Scale, S G Bond, Martin, and Howie say they monitor 100 medical conditions that affect drivers' skills and abilities to drive and yet they have not proved there are problems and they do they acknowledge that these people, with their doctors, care for themselves. If they acknowledged this care Martin and Howie would not have any power over the disabled, people they have established as the Pariah, therefore contriving a false needed management, even if the management is illegal and even if Martin and Howie kill a hundred or so people a year in Overcrowded Emerge Facilities and those waiting for Surgery.

The demand upon General Practitioners to fulfill the Drivers' Medical Examinations, DME, skews the G P/Client availability for G Ps, shorting the availability and access to G Ps, so clients go to Emerge for care and S G Bond, Martin, and Howie know this.

Think Scale, the harm comes from the consequences of forcing G Ps to administer the DME, which takes approximately 400 G Ps out of service, or more, for the S G Office's Disabled Drivers' Policy. It's also some kind of twisted Power game over doctors, as they're penalized for not administering the DME.

Think Scale, what this means is people in need of care do not have access to 10 – 15% of the body of G Ps available to the Public, which has created long wait – times to see a G P, which means clients go to Emerge for their care. This Overcrowding is the cause for 120 plus deaths a year in Overcrowded Emerge facilities; Emerge doctors hold Press Conferences about this and the Press refuses to expose Government demands, only the Public's demands upon the Universal Health Care System, UHCS. This is the Harm the Ministry of Health and the Solicitor General's Office, therefore the Office of the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles, acknowledged in a letter to me. The real Medical Doctor that wrote the co – authored letter disappeared from the Ministry of Health soon after this acknowledgment.

Question, “Was she attacked, as I was, for exposing the real consequences of the Policy and for supporting my presentation that there is no Science to justify the type 2 diabetic driving policy?”

My point is, how are we to have a UHCS, if the Government does not acknowledge their demands upon the UHCS, especially Grand demands coming from illegal and phoney demands like the DME?

*

Think Power, diabetes impacts 10% of society, pancreas 9%, breast cancer 7%, mental health issues 20% and that's only four medical conditions.

Question, “What % of the population is monitored when all 100 conditions are acknowledged?”

Question, “Do you really think Martin, Howie, and their colleagues what to give up that power over the population?”

Question, “Do you really think they want to give up that power over life and death, as they know they're killing and maiming and everyone I write about this is afraid of them?”

My point is, people should be afraid of Crimes Against Humanity but being quiet about them is wrong.

*

There are only Two User Groups of our UHCS; the Public and the Government.

Think Big Idea.

Firstly, the Public invented Democracy, then we invented Government and the Public Service.

Secondly, the Public invented the Universal Health Care System, which it uses, as does the Government.

Third, every Public want and need upon the UHCS is severely scrutinized to understand if there is any Worth and Value; if there is Worth and Value, there is a bona fide Need and the Need is part of the UHCS.

Question, “Why is it that Government demands upon the UHCS are not severely scrutinized with the same diligence as the Public's Demands?”

*

S G Bond, your illegal policy really is not defended or you would have hand delivered a copy of the Guide to me. You know the policy is illegal and harms, the harm is a conscious harm, as you have not stopped your deviant behaviour causing it.

Secondly you've stripped me of my Charter Rights, Human Rights, and Rights under local laws, such as the MVA.

Third, you also strip me of my Dignity and Self – Respect as you've contrived to have me seen as a Pariah within our “democratic society”, in order to play out your illegal policy.

My point is, it really is a Crime Against Humanity, and by default, as you're an educated person, with post high school education, you know this.

*

Seniors Driving Policy; the “DriveAble Assessment Policy”

Question, “S G Bond, What are you doing with this new Seniors Driving Policy; the “DriveAble Assessment Policy”?”. Answer, “It's just something new from Dobbs, your hired thief and liar, and absolute corrupt “academic researcher” and Human, all to give herself and her husband work, and the World should know this.”

This policy, as with the disabled policies, is not legal, as you have not fulfilled the demands of the Charter, the HR Code, and the MVA, and World Rules and Regulations concerning Human Experiments.

You've mentioned Dobbs again, as the great “academic researcher”, this time with her husband, and what ever he's supposed to be, who are running this attack upon Seniors.

Again, Dobbs stole research and used it behind the owners backs, she corrupted the very World Standards of Science and Scientific Inquiry and Scientific Method that made her. She breached her Oath of Affidavit. She breached the Trust of Affidavit. She breached her Oath of Office. She breached the Trust between Senior Public Servants and the Public. She breached the Trust between the University of Alberta, Edmonton, and herself, as she states she's an employee; done to use their prestige and status, as a research University, to mislead the Public, as to what she's doing. Dobbs breached the Trust between the University Students and herself, as she stole research, lied, and falsified documents, all things she demands Students not do.

Question, “The Public is supposed to just believe You, Martin, Howie, Dobbs and her husband have justified this Senior Policy and his phoney Cognitive Human Experiment, really a Brain and Mind Experiment, as a Sanctioned Human Experiment, managed by a bona fide Governing Body and Code of Ethics, and valid for no Harm?”

My point is, this policy stalks, tracks, and hunts Seniors for no bona fide reason and the first Senior that dies due to this policy, through the stress' and strains of your hunt, is Genocide. Your “academic researcher”, Dobbs, studies Seniors, she knows about the stress' and strains this Policy will do to Seniors. She uses this knowledge against them for employment for herself and her husband. She's using this knowledge to pre – Stress Seniors for her husband.

Honourable Solicitor General Bond, you, Martin, Howie, and Dobbs and her husband have taken us, British Columbia and Canada, a Democracy, to the Brink of Genocide and you have no Right to do so.

Question, “What are you doing?”

My point is, S G Bond, as Martin attacked me for exposing his illegal policy harm and have been demand my Rights, with Equality and Inclusion, which he is denying, and you did nothing with this or his personal attack and assault, if he kills me this time, this means you'll be charged with Homicide, as you did nothing to stop a known criminal with proven violent and deep psychological mental health problems.

My point is, this policy stalks, tracks, and hunts Seniors for no bona fide reason. S G Bond, you, Martin, Howie are again attacking a very specific, a vulnerable minority, and as a Class of People for no bona fide reason, which denies them their Charter and Human Rights and willingly damages their Dignity and Self – Respect, which means this illegal policy is another Crime Against Humanity.

My Point is, with the first Senior that dies due to this policy, or their partner, through the stress' and strains of your hunt, your actions are then defined as Genocide. Your “academic researcher”, Dobbs, studies Seniors, she knows about the stress' and strains your illegal policy will do to Seniors; she's practicing what she's learned.

Honourable Solicitor General Bond, you have taken us to the Brink of Genocide and you have no Right to do so.

My point is, Democracies work as hard as they can to not get here. Your cowardice, ignorance, and corruption has brought B C and Canada into a Crime Against Humanity. Your failure as a Politician and Democrat have taken us to the Brink of Genocide. Your actions of covering – up these illegal policies and their Consequences are Dis – Honourable.

*



If Martin or His Thugs kill me you need to know these things

Reader, as mentioned above, I wrote Howie in 2010 asking for the Guide, as she is supposed to manage Driving Policy, as she had had a full year, after the 2009 BCHRT Decision, which gave her more time to complete the Guide.

My point is, the language used by Howie and her counsel in the Discrimination Complaint feigns, really misleads, that there is a Policy Paper concerning the Disabled Drivers' Policy. There wasn't. I was given scrapes of papers and notes on different medical conditions that you and I, as Humans, may encounter. So, what. They were presented and listed with formality, feigning a bona fide Government Policy. It was just noise coming from corrupt Senior Public servants and their lawyer. This collection of scraps of paper, some with a medical doctor's name on them, did not fulfill the demands of the Charter, the HR Code, and the MVA. They never offered any Science to justify the Policy.

My point is, if this doctor presented this work for his degree he would not have received a degree in Medicine, or any other higher degree, little lone a BA or B Sc.

Secondly, who ever put this collection of scrap together forgot to mention the Harm of using so many G Ps to administer the DME. So, we have a Medical Doctor refusing to acknowledge his intervention as a Doctor.

Third, they forgot to mention they never proved any Good coming from this illegal policy.

Fourth, they never mentioned I visit the G P for bona fide diabetic care at a rate of every three months, or 20 times to the Government's one visit, (1), every five years.

The Presentation looked official due to format and having a real medical doctor put his name on it; this charade was supposed to prove all was bona fide. I wouldn't allow that doctor to work on my dog; I don't think Vets would either.

My point is, when Doctors support this policy ask them the above and how much they're getting paid for their corrupt point of “view”. Ask them how they balance of the “killing and maiming” with their Code of Ethics.

My point is, when Martin and Howie state they were just adding too or updating an existing Policy, its just more lies.



Howie responded by having her counsel demand I not contact Howie again. I couldn't believe that was Howie's response. She had been involved in my Inquiry since 2002 and had ample time to justify the Policy, as that's what her job is; to justify and manage Driving Policy. I didn't respond to the lawyer, as I saw this as just more stonewalling and corruption coming from Howie and her corrupt and lying lawyer. (This lawyer is not just a lawyer with Third Party Protection presenting for her client, but a corrupt lawyer working outside the Laws of Canada. As this policy is illegal, it's running against the Demands and Objectives of the Crown, therefore the behaviour is Treasonous, therefore she is not protected by the Third Party Protection of our working “democratic society”, which is freely given to lawyers acting within our Democracy. As she freely works for Traitors, she freely gives up the Third Party Protection. She knows this, therefore she is guilty of treason, as well as a liar, breaching her lawyer's Code of Ethics, therefore nothing coming from her needs to believed as having legal tender. Secondly, as she tried to cover – up the breached Crown Settlement Agreement I had with the Crown she's guilty of Treasonous Acts, therefore willingly giving up her Democracy and Third Party Protection; she did this with the Senior lawyer in the Attorney General's Office. Third, she has lied and falsified documents, which takes her from under the umbrella of Third Party Protection. Fourth, as with Democracy, the Public invented it and implements it, as with our UHCS, the Public invented it and implements it, and it's the same with the Third Party Protection Lawyers have, the Democracy of Canada freely gives Third Party Protection to Lawyers because of the events they become involved in, the things we do to each other and the things that happen to us. Lawyers do not act above Canada and just some how have this Third Party Protection; it comes from our “democratic society” and when they act outside the Charter of Rights and Freedoms they willingly give up Protection instruments.)

My point is, as this was 2010, the year the Guide was made Public, Howie should have said the policy was being published, or had been published, or that it would be published soon, as Howie would have known this, as this Guide is the biggest thing on her desk. And, she had promised me and the BCHRT that she only needed a little more time to complete the Guide, so the BCHRT gave her more time; hold it, this had been over a year but she originally promised the Guide in 2006 – early 2007; from my first BCHRT Discrimination Complaint. It really is biggest thing on her desk, as she had not legally justified the policy and she had been running it for years knowing this. In other words she had broken her Oath of Office all these years, as well as performed Treasonous acts, as she was running illegal Government Policy against the Demands and Objectives of the Crown, which killed the Public, the very thing the Crown is made from; the Public (the mother) invented Laws, the Politician, and Public Service, (the children), the very stuff we call the Crown; interesting eh, the Children killing the Mother.

Questions; “What was the stage of Production of the Guide when I wrote in 2010?” and “Was the Guide completed when I wrote?” and “Why didn't Howie send me my Copy as promised in 2010?” and “As this Guide would finally legalize Howie's actions, therefore fulfill her Oath of Office, why didn't she send me this original work on disabled drivers?”

Reader, I had been inquiring, since 2002 – 2004, about the diabetic drivers' policy, as I have type 2 diabetes, and I had not discovered any Science to justify a Policy or the phoney DME. My first BCHRT Discrimination complaint of 2004 – 2006 challenged Howie and she knew she would need to justify her policy. To Not have a BCHRT Court Case she offered an 'out of court Crown Settlement Agreement' where she promised a Policy Paper and changes to the diabetic policy; all the things I list that are needed to justify the policy she knew she would need to address if she wanted this policy to be legal. I was asked if I would like to Review Drafts of the Policy Paper to be and I said I would. One cannot be involved in Discrimination Complaints if one is not Approachable, Accommodating, and Compromising, which I have been. This cannot be said about S G Bond, Martin, Howie, Dobbs, and their supporters; they're the opposite, they're liars, thieves, thugs, bullies, incompetent, corrupt, and cowards. I was asked to Review a Draft, then a Policy, then a new Draft, where a policy paper was promised for early 2007.

My point is, as I Reviewed the first 'Draft', I Deconstructed it sentence by sentence, and it now looks as if Dobbs wrote it, where she now had bona fide examples of what was acceptable and not. The writers of the Draft had not justified the Policy by fulfilling the demands of the Charter, the HR Code, and the MVA. They did not prove the Intervention, the DME, could do what it is alleged to be able to do, failed to mention the horrific Consequences they had admitted to, failed to acknowledge any Good, and failed to acknowledge I visit the G P. With this knowledge they still did not fulfill these demands in the 'Policy Paper' they gave for Review, or the next 'Draft'. They simply deleted sentences, or moved them, or moved Sections around and dropped a couple of Sections. This charade from Dobbs or whom ever wrote these Drafts and Policy Paper reminded me of the scraps of paper I was offered in my first Discrimination Complaint. A format that looked very official, therefore bona fide, but no one put their name to it and there was no Science to justify anything.

My point is, Howie has had years to initiate and complete the Guide for diabetes and should have informed me if she was only a few months from publishing, as she would have known this. She also knows this policy is not needed from my letters of Inquiry and Discrimination Complaint and if her so called 'expert academic researcher', Dobbs, had really done her Professional Job, she would also have come to understand this.

Secondly, Dobbs would not be able to prove the killing and maiming coming from the Intervention was acceptable. That's another reason Dobbs is a complete failure, a corrupt “academic researcher”, that does not need to be believed.

Howie knows her Guide would not justify the illegal policy or its horrific consequences; therefore more stonewalling and procrastination and all the while the consequences are still causing Overcrowding in Emerge, the killing and slaughter she has written about continues today. Government killing of the Public is not acceptable under any circumstances.

Question, “What kind of person is Howie to live out the above, lying and hiding, knowing she's directly causing the Overcrowding in Emerge and the horrific consequences?”

Reader, we need to go back a bit, after my first discrimination complaint, where I withdrew the complaint for the Crown Settlement Agreement, 2006, I waited a year before asking Howie where the Policy Paper was, as I had reviewed three Policy Papers and found them all wanting, as they still had not fulfilled the demands of the Charter, the HR Code, and the MVA, nor acknowledged the Harm, the lack of Good, and that I visit a real G P for care every three months. Martin and Howie would not respond, they hid from me, so I lodged my third BCHRT Discrimination Complaint where Dobbs stole and lied trying to justify the policy for them.

My point is, this stonewalling is just part of the corruption I've found myself within. Their history of corruption is well documented through their acts of stonewalling, which documents their callousness and disregard for the sanctity life itself.

My point is, if I didn't confront Dobbs and Deconstruct her lies her presentation would have been accepted and the Diabetic Policy listed as proved legal. All on stolen documents and lies. You don't read the policy is legal because they withdrew their presentation to defend it, as they could not legally or Scientifically defend it.

Question, “Martin and Howie withdrew their defense of the policy, so why is it still being played out knowing the Harm?”

*

“View” of Life

Again, before my Discrimination complaints the driving policies concerning diabetic drivers and disabled drivers were based upon former Solicitor General's, past Superintendents, Howie's, and their anti – disabled lobbyists “view” of life. That's what they wrote. As they did not fulfill the demands of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, the BC Human Rights Code, and the demands of the Motor Vehicle Act, therefore their Oath of Office why should anyone believe their “view” of life worthwhile following? Especially after they admitted they know the harm.

Question, “We're supposed to follow Homicidal maniacs' “view” of life?”

My point is, these people have deep psychological mental health issues and we don't need to be quiet about it. They know they're killing the Public, the naïve bystander in Emerge and those waiting for surgery. Somehow they've compared their killing to the imagined difference in killing between disabled drivers compared to non – disabled drivers and they think this is ok. Or do they just compare their killing to the killing coming from disabled drivers; accidental or not.

Question, “Are they saying disabled drivers are consciously killing, as they are?”

My point is, they're acting as if a consciously constructed killing is acceptable compared to a believed accidental killing. Or on a different scale, the harm from their Intervention, the DME, is acceptable, as they balance this off to the believed accidental harm from a disabled driver mishap.

Important, it's important to remember that these policies are supposedly based upon the proven difference in driver mishaps between the type 2 diabetic and non – diabetic drivers. It's not about; diabetic drivers having driver mishaps or not, they do. It's about; is there a substantial difference between type 2 driver mishaps and non – diabetic driver mishaps. Martin, Howie and their cronies have not proved this. It's just a belief, their “view” of life. They're all lying. It's based on their bias, fear and loathing, hate, disgust, contempt, bigotry, discrimination, prejudice, and Group – Thinking of Wrong – Thinking.

Secondly, it's called 'driver mishap' in bona fide research, as 'accidents' portray the wrong images and not all accidents, such as, fender benders in malls or someone driving over your garbage cans, which cause an insurance claim. Driver mishaps include all insurance claims not just an 'accident report' of death or severe maiming, where diabetes may not have been proved to have been the influence, where it may only be known a participant in the driver mishap had diabetes, or a medical condition.

This bias, bigotry, prejudice, and ignorance coming from bigots needed to be adjusted, as insurance claims also include your neighbour running over your kid's bike, he or she left on the street, or your garbage cans that rolled into the street and were run over by some unknown neighbour that can't stand you, etc, etc.

Third, I have not found a study that shows diabetic drivers are killing more people than non – diabetic drivers. If it was out there Howie would have sent me a copy and she didn't. Dobbs would have included it in the two hundred articles she stole and she didn't. They're making these things up, and each supports the other in some kind of mad thinking; Gangsters.

My point is, Death and Maiming is not to be taken lightly and those attacking me have not proved I'm killing more people than they are; the difference in killing, therefore instigating so kind of driving policy.

Question, “As I'm not killing more than non – diabetics are, as disabled are not killing more than non – disabled are, why aren't straights not forced to undergo special treatment and forced to undergo a Drivers' Medical Examination?”

Fourth, in order to make the killing Equal in Representation, we need to add all those killed by non – disabled drivers plus the illegal policy; those killed in Emerge and those waiting for Surgery, as they are being killed by the actions of the non – disabled. At only 1 person a month in the ten most Overcrowded Emerge Facilities, out of 100 or so hospitals in BC, thats 12 a month per hospital x 10 hospitals = 120 people a year. Times the 10 years I've been inquiring is 1 200 people.

Question, “Do you really believe Emerge Doctors call NEWS conferences for one (1) death caused by the Overcrowding?”



My point is, this kind of thinking by S G Bond, Martin, Howie, Dobbs and their colleagues is Group – Thinking of Wrong – Thinking. (Explained below in the Section on bona fide Scientific Social Experiments, p 57). This Group – Thinking of Wrong – Thinking is more than poor thinking, it's unethical, immoral, and absolutely inhumane. This kind of thinking leads to the thinking that leads us, Humans, to a Crime Against Humanity, as defined by the United Nations.

My point is, these people have put themselves above; “Where Canada is founded upon principles that recognize the supremacy of God and the rule of law: ” (from our Charter of Rights and Freedoms)

My point is, this kind of Group – Thinking of Wrong – Thinking leads to Genocide, and by default, as an “academic researcher” Dobbs and her husband know this.

*

S G Bond, your behaviour considering this pettiness concerning not sending me the Guide is laughable, except we know, through communications with your Office, you know this policy is Illegal and Harms society. The harm is the Overcrowding in Emerge facilities and to those waiting for surgery, as your illegal policies demand hundreds of General Practitioners to complete the phoney Driver Medical Examinations and now millions of dollars to pay for it, as my Discrimination complaint changed who pays for the DME today; our taxes now pay for this phoney DME, since 2006.

My point is, I needed spinal surgery three years ago, due to lack of funding and long wait – times for surgery I bought my own spinal surgery. All included it was $10 000. The cost of paying for the illegal policy's phoney DME that does NO GOOD, would pay for all surgeries that are wait – listed, which are bona fide demands upon the UHCS, paid by the UHCS, and do Good, where your policy is not legal, not a bona fide demand upon the UHCS, and offers NO Good.

Question, “How does an illegal policy with demands upon the UHCS, which offers No Good, get paid for by the UHCS?”

It's because the S G Office reimburses the UHCS the fees it pays to the G P for administering the DME. If the policy is cancelled millions of dollars would be transferred from the funds the S G Office is allocated for business; transferred to the Min of Health for bona fide demands upon the system, as demands are already there, so taxes should remain with the UHCS.

My point is, the old saying about Money is Power and Prestige is evident here, as those in the auto industry, the Solicitor General's Office do not what to give up funding even if they kill a few hundred citizens a year. Those in the car industry could not stand this decrease in status and funds going to well educated people, like doctors and bona fide medical researchers, instead of staying with the boys and girls in the car industry that kill and maime, instead of saving and making well. Loosing status to bona fide Scientists and doctors, compared to having their own corrupt “academic researcher” is just not acceptable to this Group – Think of Wrong – Thinkers.

Question, “What kind of Bias, Bigotry, Prejudice, Hate, and Rage is coming from those in the car industry to do this to doctors, the naïve bystander, the disabled, the diabetic, the UHCS, and our Country?”

My point is, their behaviour is over the edge, there is severe mental health issues within the Solicitor General's Office and the Office of the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles and we do not need to be quiet about this corruption and killing.

*

RCMP involvement

Martin should have sent the Guide to me, as he's the boss, rather he believes he's the boss of the Gangsters. That's his job. Howie should have sent me the Guide, as that's her job as the Deputy, to manage policy; make sure the policy is Legal, does Good, and does no Harm.

By not sending me this Guide, as promised, again exemplifies Martin's mental health issues, as well as Howie's, as they consciously did this. All my demands are legal, demanding Senior Public Servants fulfill the demands of our Constitution, Human Rights, and Rights I have under the Motor Vehicle Act, the very Public business he and she are supposed to be managing, and their Oaths of Office.

Again, Solicitor General, you remember Martin, he attacked and assaulted me and denigrated my character for exposing his illegal policy and its harm to ICBC, last year at this time. He falsified legal documents to do so. He used his “Notice of Prohibition” to cancel my license. When the RCMP used that Form to do so, I realized Martin has falsified documents to make it seem the “Notice of Prohibition” had legal tender. Martin has not fulfilled the Sections of the MVA he lists on the “Notice of Prohibition” giving it power.

My point is, Martin has ICBC suspending and cancelling licenses, using illegal documents. He has ICBC implementing his demands upon disabled drivers knowing he's lying to ICBC. ICBC now knows this.

Question, Martin has the RCMP collecting licenses using illegal documents. S G Bond is also labeled the “Minister of Justice”, the Ministry that manages the RCMP, which means the RCMP know this and haven't done anything. “Why?”

Question, “As I informed the RCMP concerning Dobbs' theft, breach Oath and of Affidavit, and the illegal policy and its known harm, why did the RCMP bury all this?”

My point is, the Ottawa Senior RCMP played with this for months before telling me they couldn't do anything.

Question, “How long have they known about this lie of Martin's, concerning the “Notice of Prohibition”?”

Question, “S G Bond, is your corruption why you abruptly signed the new twenty year contract with the RCMP?”

Question, “S G Bond, do you owe the RCMP, as I've informed them of your illegal policy and its killing, Dobbs' theft of research and breach of Oath and of Affidavit, and they've buried this for you?”

Question, “They buried this illegal policy, the killing and maiming, the breached Affidavit, and the phoney “Notice of Prohibition” for a twenty year contract?”

*

S G Bond, the BCHRT Decision informed me, as you stated you had almost completed the Guide, that I would need to wait until you completed Guide, so that it could be presented as a whole item. For some unknown reason the BCHRT stated that you did not need to prove you had a diabetic section for me to Review, so that I could Review it as promised in my out of court 'Crown Settlement Agreement', and if I thought it appropriate I could lodge my fourth Discrimination Complaint. This simple request was denied me, which really was a bona fide request, as the diabetic policy should have been completed years ago, as I was the one that instigated the Guide, and had demanded proof of policy in 2002.

My point is, the diabetic policy should have been available for Review in 2008 – 2009.

My point is, one would think Martin and Howie would relish at the idea to having me Review and Deconstruct a Section of their Seminal work on Disabled Drivers for validity and bona fide (ness), before the Guide, as a whole, was published.

My point is, I reviewed a Draft, Policy, and Draft and Dobbs' HRT Presentation and proved the policy not needed and you know this, as did the BCHRT. There's nothing better than having bona fide Deconstruction of one's work for validity.

Question, “Who threatened the BCHRT, so that they did not demand of Martin and Howie produce the Section on Diabetes, as that's what my BCHRT Discrimination Complaint was about?”

My point is, one would think S G Bond, Martin, and Howie would relish in the idea of proving their policy and its consequences are legal before publishing, done through bona fide criticism.

My point is, if the diabetic policy had been proven as valid and bona fide I would not have needed to continue on and they could stop lying, falsifying documents, killing, and maiming. They didn't do this, which means they have not fulfilled what is demanded of them as a Politician and Senior Public Servants.

My point is, they couldn't even send me the 'Complete Guide', as they're ashamed of the work, which means they have not fulfilled the demands of the Charter, the HR Code, the MVA and have breached their Oath of Office again. And all the while they know the killing and slaughter continues in Emerge and with those waiting for surgery.

S G Bond, you, Premier Clark, Martin, Howie, your colleagues, and the RCMP are growing a Crime Against Humanity, and it's lead us, British Columbians and Canadians, to the Brink of Genocide, as the policies are illegal, knowingly harms our society, denigrating, denies the Public their Charter Rights and Human Rights, as Martin's recent attack and assault upon me again exemplifies and your refusal to send me the Guide exemplifies.

**

Long Version, pp 12 – 80



Reader, the following explains my demands more thoroughly, what's really needed to prove the need for the policy, and if it can really do what it's alleged to be able to do. This needs to be written down just in case Martin does kill me. The following will give the Public the underpinnings of what to ask those Criminals, Murders, and Traitors I'm exposing. I've also copied previous letters to a blog site for the Public and safe keeping; 2diabetes.blogspot.com

*

Mental Health Issues

Honourable Shirley Bond, Solicitor General, you and your Office breached your Oath of Office again, and numerous other criminal acts, by not sending me the “BC 2010 Guide in Determining Fitness to Drive”, which was promised me due to my BC Human Rights Discrimination Complaints. It's your job to manage your staff, not mine. I made an inquiry concerning the Guide, in 2010, when I wrote your Deputy Superintendent of Motor Vehicles, Liza Howie, only to have your private counsel respond and tell me to not write her again, as in their mind the BCHRT complaint was still active, which means your counsel should have informed me when the Guide was published and their client, you, would be fulfilling the Obligations of the BCHRT Decision and sending me the Guide. Nothing was done. Nasty, nasty, liars your counsel and staff. But what should one expect from liars, thieves, traitors, and murders.

Questions, “How is it Howie never sent me the Guide, as it's the most important thing on her desk?”

“How is it that her Boss, Steve Martin, the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles, had enough time to attack and assault me and denigrate my character last year but not enough time to send me the promised copy the year before?”

My point is, I must have been on his mind, as he falsified documents in order to attack me, in a deliberate act to harm me a year after the Guide was published.

Question, “This petty and dysfunctional behaviour again exemplifies Martin's deep psychological problems, as does he really believe his actions would not be discovered and written about?”

My point is, his actions harm himself, as well as me. His actions harm the naïve bystander, as his policy is not needed and he knows this and he also knows it kills and maims.
Question, “Why does Martin continue to support his illegal policy knowing he needs to lie and hide his actions?”

Question, “How many Guides were sent out to other people and agencies?”

My point is, those people and agencies received a Guide, and yet, it wasn't their BCHRT Discrimination Complaints or legal complaints that forced Government to legally justify the policy and explain the killing and maiming.

Question, “Why did they get a copy and not me?”

Question, “Were these people sent a copy, as they will just turn their heads to the phoney Guide, and not question it, use it to manipulate clients, use it against the Public, etc, all done due to some attachment or funding from Government?”

My point is, Martin learned he could break the law again when he didn't send me the Guide. He learned again that he could break the law when attack me personally, abuse his position in Government by lying he was doing bona fide government business, and when caught S G Bond protected him. He's learned he can be a Monster.

He escalated his deviant behaviour to a personal level, with his attack against me, beginning with the change of Classification of diabetes type. When I complained to ICBC about this, that they didn't have the right to demand a new Drivers Medical Examination or cancel my license, Martin decided to show me who's Boss and cancelled my license indefinitely by falsifying documents, forcing ICBC to cancel my license indefinitely.

In the world of macho men like Martin, this Boss attitude and behaviour is Sexual Act; he's showing me who's the Big Dog, that he's Bigger than the Charter, Human Rights, the MVA, and his Oath of Office, and when I would not bow down to him and kiss his ass, or perform fellatio on him, he didn't like.

Reader, I wrote about this escalation of Martin's deviant behaviour, his escalation to a personal attack, a perverted Sexual Act, in a letter to S G Bond and ICBC and others to protect myself. Martin falsified legal documents, which would allow him to use his phoney, illegal, “Notice of Prohibition” to cancel my license indefinitely. This was a conscious act of Harm, and I still didn't bow to him. I told Martin I would not kiss his ass, perform fellatio, or bend over his desk and have him sodomize me. This is what Martin's actions were all about, showing me who's Boss. Showing me he's bigger than the Charter, the HR Code, the MVA and his Oath of Office. He's not bigger that Canada or Humanity, it's just that S G Bond and others are afraid of him and his Treason, Killing and Maiming, therefore their killing and maiming.

My point is, Martin has not changed and his behaviour will only worsen, and with this letter it's only logical to understand this criminal, liar, thief, brute, bully, sexual predator, traitor, and murder will again escalate his deviant behaviour.

And S G Bond, Martin, Howie, and their colleagues don't have mental health issues for condoning this?

My point is, Solicitor General Bond knows all this, as the different Ministries and Departments in Government she's been involved in needed to cover – up and rationalize these illegal policies in order to run them, due to the interactions and consequences of the policies to other departments, such as the illegal demands upon the UHCS and the use of our taxes to now pay for the DME, by shuffling around who pays for it, to make it seem bona fide, and then again shuffling taxes to reimburse the UHCS.



So, yes, Honourable Solicitor General Shirley Bond you've known about these illegal policies for years and the need to justify them, as you're the voted in Manager, not some dysfunctional boss. You chose not to Manage. You've tried to bury this. What a fine Christian Politician you are. You really should have forced Martin or Howie to suspend to Policy, to send me the promised Guide, which they also promised the BCHRT they would do, even if no one was watching them.

My point is, their pettiness, shallowness, and complete disregard for life and the “rule of law” and the “supremacy of God”, and their Group – Thinking of Wrong – Thinking is laughable, except their behaviour is a breach of Trust between Government and the Public, Government and an entity such as the BCHRT, and breach of their Oath of Office, as they've lied, mislead, misinformed, and misrepresented as to their behaviour and what is demanded of them. (quotes from the Charter of Rights and Freedoms)

My point is, the absolute sadness of all this is that all the while they knew and know this policy was and still is illegal and that it harms society. They should have put the policy on hold after I brought this forward during 2002 – 2004, to stop the killing and discrimination they accidentally admitted to; take the ten busiest Overcrowded Emerge Facilities, of the one hundred hospitals in B C, at only one death a month, therefore 12 a year, gives us 120 lives that would have been saved in the past year. In the ten years I've been inquiring that would have been 1 200 people not killed; at a minimum.

That's right, just putting the policy on hold until it was justified would have save 1 200 lives or more in the past ten years. That's a policy worth having.

Questions, “What kind of mental health do these people have for doing this?” and “If you knew your illegal behaviour was harming people wouldn't you stop it?”

These are not stupid people. They are not ignorant people. They've done this for so long they like it. They're hiding what they are doing, because they know it's so unbelievably wrong, but they continue, because they like it.

Questions, “Are all these people Schizophrenic, do they live dual lives?” and “Do they live the schizophrenic life of Senior Public Servants believing they are fulfilling the “rule of law”, the “supremacy of God” and laws of Humanity and yet on the other hand they know the policy is illegal and harms so they mislead, misinform, and misrepresent about what they are doing?” and “Or, do they really know of the difference?”and “What about Dementia and Borderline Personality Disorder?”

My point is, Schizophrenic or not, they know the difference, their mental health issues are deep but not deep enough they don't know what they're doing. They know enough to work really hard to hide what they're doing. They're all Monsters.

*

Honour?

Honourable Shirley Bond. Where's the Honour in your behaviour? Your behaviour has broken the Honour of your Office, which means you have broken your Oath of Office. It really is Dis – Honourable Conduct.

I accuse you and your corrupt staff of breaching your Oath of Office and the Trust between the Government and Public, as you have deliberately mislead, misinformed, and misrepresented the Public and me concerning the Guide. As you did not live up to your obligations of sending me the Guide I know you have not fulfilled the demands of Canada and BC to legalize the Diabetic Drivers' Policy and the horrific consequences coming from the Policy or you would have made sure I received it, as I forced you to write it.

I accuse you and your staff of not fulfilling the demands of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, Section 1, the demands of the BC Human Right Code, Section 8, and the demands of the Motor Vehicle Act, Sections 25 and 29, which means you and your staffs' behaviour is Treasonous, as you're running Government policy against the Demands and Objectives of the Laws of Canada and British Columbia.

My point is, you do this for your own gain; salary, pension, status, prestige, love of criminality, and power, as you run this policy knowing it's illegal and kills and maims the Public; you act contrary to the Laws of B C and Canada.

Questions, “How do you explain your involvement in an illegal policy that kills?” and “Are you saying you're afraid of Martin and Howie and their corrupt monster friends?”

If that's what you're saying, that's not Good enough.

I accuse you of Mass Murder and a Crime Against Humanity, as you know your policy is illegal and you know you're killing and maiming the naïve bystander in Emerge and those waiting for surgery and have done nothing to rectify the killing and maiming, you constantly try to cover – up your illegal behaviour.

I again accuse you of breaching a Crown Settlement Agreement and lying about it; your lie brings you into a 'past act of Government', as you lied to defend and cover – up the conscious breach of my out of court “Crown Settlement Agreement”. I brought this lie of yours forward while you were defending Steve Martin, Superintendent of Motor Vehicles, for his attack, assault, and denigration of my character, for exposing his illegal diabetic policy to ICBC and not sending me the Guide. He used his position in government to pretend he was doing government business but it was a personal attack and you know it; as your lie personally attacked me. He lied and falsified documents to do so, which your lie also does, and of course you did not fire him, as you did not Resign, as he's just part of the Gangsters you've become.

My point is, Gangster is defined by the book: “Gangsta in the House; Understanding Gang Culture; Mike Knox, Momentum Books, Ltd, 1995.

The book defines Gangsters and how they protect each other, how they cover up their illegal activities, and how they give each other work and benefits. How they care nothing for the society that gives them the opportunity to have 'life'. How they hunt and abuse vulnerable people and minorities. It defines their deviant and criminal behaviour; deviant and criminal as consciously breaking the laws of the country they're in, in this instance the Charter, Human Rights, local laws such as the MVA, and Oaths of Office. How such behaviour kills and maims the naïve bystander, and how this behaviour is cover – up through blame and misleading information. How they use lies and fear to manipulate those within their influence. How they involve different levels of violence into their behaviour, as Martin escalated his Government anti – social, hand off involvement, his violence to the personal level, and how he incorporated deviant sex into his violence.

My point is, S G Bond, your actions concerning the Illegal Disabled Drivers' Policies and the Harm define Gangster behaviour; Un – Honourable behaviour.

Your actions to defend and cover – up Martins attack and assault and criminal behaviour again exemplifies your dishonourable behaviour.

My point is, again, your lie to me concerns my first Discrimination Complaint, which was not resolved by the BCHRT, as you stated. I responded to you and demanded you Resign or quit for your lie and breach of Oath of Office; you decided not to resign or stand up for British Columbia and fight monsters like Martin and Howie and their supporters. You became them; corrupt, liar, thief, bully, thug, traitor, and murder.

My point is, being one step away from behaviour that kills, and this is illegal behaviour, is just as guilty as pulling the trigger. You haven't done one thing to stop these people, therefore, as you manage them, you're part of their killing, your actions are still a degree of Homicide and you know it; that's the 'why' of the lies and misinformation concerning the Guide.

*

Again, the Solicitor General's Office asked me to withdraw the Discrimination Complaint for promises offered. I agreed. Then the promises were broken and lies told to cover – up the breach. Where the senior lawyer in the Attorney General's Office, Hunt and the S G Office's private counsel, Iyer, from the law firm Heenan Blaikie, played a charade to cover – up this deliberate action, using their positions of prestige and status to mislead and misrepresent, as to what they were doing; which is a breach of their Oath of Office and when I wrote the Attorney General, retired lawyer and judge, Wally Opal, he would not explain the charade I caught his Senior lawyer playing out or respond to the fact the Diabetic Policy was illegal and that the Government had accidentally acknowledge the Harm of the policy.

My point is, what Opal and Hunt did was support the stonewalling of any challenge of the illegal policy and its horrific consequences of Homicide and Maiming, little lone the Treason involved in running a policy against the Demands and Objectives of the Charter. I was instructed to go to the Supreme Court of B C if I didn't like what they were doing.

The charade was also contrived and played out to stonewall on the promises made, the commitment made by the S G Office to make changes to the diabetic policy, as I had pointed out there was no Science to justify the policy, little lone the Harm, which is the Overcrowding in Emerge and those waiting for surgery.

My point is, you need to know this about the above lie from S G Bond; as she and her cronies are all liars and corrupt and they will say and do anything to cover – up their illegal policy and the killing. Lying is just part of ignorant, cowardly, and corrupt Politicians, corrupt Senior Public Servants, and Gangsters.

Again, after the assault by Martin I was reminding the S G Office that I had waited years for the Guide that was supposed to be ready in early late 2006 – 2007. I waited a year before making inquiries and as Martin and Howie would not respond to my inquiry, as to where the policy paper was, I lodged another BCHRT complaint in 2008, where the BCHRT agreed to hear concerns that could lead to a Discrimination Complaint, as nothing had been offer to justify the policy. In early 2009 the BCHRT reversed it's position and gave the Solicitor General's Office, Martin, and Howie more time to complete the Guide and yet it was promised in 2006.

My point is, that Decision was interesting as the BCHRT knew the policy was illegal, it harmed, and Martin and Howie had just presented stolen documents in their effort to justify the policy, which were withdrawn, meaning Martin and Howie withdrew their proof the Policy was needed, and the Intervention could do what it was alleged to be able to do; in other words they withdrew their defense of the illegal policy and the BCHRT turned its back on this fact.

Question, “Who threatened the B C Human Rights Tribunal?”

A year later, 2010, I wrote Howie asking where the policy paper was and was politely told by her counsel to go away and they would contact me if needed. Then one day in 2011 Martin arbitrarily changed my Classification of diabetes and demanded a new medical examination where, I, knowing he was a liar, thief, traitor, and murderer informed ICBC they didn't have the Right to cancel my license for an arbitrary change in Classification and for non – compliance to the phoney Driver's Medical Examination.

My point is, ICBC should have instigated an investigation into the complaint concerning Martin's illegal policy and its harm. They did nothing but cancel my license for Martin and for an indefinite time. That's right, Martin lied on his official documentation in order to escalate his lies concerning me, therefore escalating his power to use his phoney, illegal “Notice of Prohibition” to cancel my license indefinitely. It was interesting to experience the Hate coming from Martin and the cowardice of ICBC.

Question, “Who threatened ICBC?”

My point is, Dishonourable people such as S G Bond, will do anything to protect themselves and their deviant behaviour.

My point is, this is why S G Bond lied, to deny any accountability for the illegal policy and its consequences and illegal deviant behaviour from her staff and herself; she tried to shuffle her responsibilities and accountability back to the BCHRT.



This madness from S G Bond was great to read. S G Bond was just like a kid with his or her hand caught in the cookie jar, blaming someone else for putting it there, except this wasn't just a simple lie. It's the Solicitor General lying about what her staff had done, lying about a breached Crown Settlement Agreement, lying to the Public that the Crown did not make a Settlement Agreement with the Public, me.

My point is, breaching a Crown Settlement Agreement and lying about it is another act of Treason.

This lie is just as serious as the lies told by Martin in his attack and assault upon me. Martin lied about having informants informing him I was driving, while I was under the suspension he illegally lodged against me. This meant Martin had spies tracking me. ICBC did not report they were spying on me, as they do with some insurance claims. Hold it. This isn't an insurance claim, I was informing ICBC they were being manipulated by Martin and Howie to illegally suspend and cancel licenses and run an illegal policy for them. I was exposing criminals to ICBC. ICBC investigates acts they believe are criminal?

Question, “Where's their Investigation into this crime of illegal policy and illegal demands?”

Question, “Who threatened ICBC?”

Question, “Why would S G Bond lie about this?”

Answer, “She lied to distract from the illegal policy and its harm, what Martin had done to me for exposing the illegal policy, and the fact that she knew the Guide had been completed in 2010 and it had not been sent to me.”

By going off in a tangent, blaming the BCHRT for not fulfilling its involvement in my Discrimination Complaint, she deliberately mislead, misinformed and misrepresented, as to the Government's Crown Settlement Agreement. By stating the Settlement Agreement was with the BCHRT she was trying to contrive a legal attachment to the BCHRT, meaning if I had any problems with the tardiness of the Guide I should take it up with the BCHRT. Additionally, any diversion from the truth again contrives stonewalling concerning any responsibility for the consequences of the policy.

My point is, S G Bond is no different than the any criminal, they deny, deny, deny, and lying is just part of that denial.

My point is, don't forget, S G Bond's Office is absolutely corrupt as my Inquiry into this has been going on for ten years now, and the Senior Staff contrive the letters for her to sign, done to manipulate and deceive the Public. She is not alone in these lies.

S G Bond, you've done the opposite of what an Honourable Politician should do; you're involved or running the stonewalling, lying, the falsification of documents, the hiring of thieves and liars in an effort to justify the policy and its consequences, you attacked and assaulted me, and denigrated my character, all in an effort to stymie my Rights and Freedoms, as a Canadian and Human. Done to hide your Treason and Homicide and demonstrate to our “democratic society” you're above the “rule of law” in Canada. Above the “supremacy of God” in Canada.

You're an absolute failure as a Person and Politician.

Question, “S G Bond, if your illegal policy kills one of your children what will you do?”

My point is, asking a psychopath and sociopath a question such as the above is senseless, but it needs to be said.

*

Time; the Benefit of

My point is, the Solicitor General's Office has had more Politicians than any other Ministry in the past ten years, the ten years I've been inquiring about this Policy; I believe there's been eight. Get rid of the Politician and the Cancer, like Martin and Howie, and their supporters in the Attorney General's Office are still there. The liars, brutes, bullies, cowards, traitors, and murders are still there. Martin, Howie and their supporters are also the traitors and murders and need to be exposed, as this policy could not be played without their directions and support, as they're the permanent staff and its their jobs.

As they are long term employees they take the long term “view” of stonewalling and deception regarding their behaviour and support for this policy. They play the attrition charade, play me with lies, threaten people like me, maybe Politicians, threaten entities such as ICBC and the BCHRT. Their charade is well thought out and well played, as they are educated and they're in the background giving themselves anonymity, offering arms length protection to their colleagues. And in their positions of Senior Public Servants, along for the long term, they've played this out over a long term for some perverted unknown reasons. They really are Monsters of the Human Species, they are the psychopaths and sociopaths of society. They contrive to have the Politician as the Scapegoat. They are liars and thieves, as their “academic researcher”, Dobbs, has proven to be.

My point is, today I write because the Guide that I forced the Government to write, to legally justify their behavior, their demands upon the Public, has been completed. As you now know it should have arrived on my doorstep for me to Deconstruct. To tear apart to see if these liars and murders have really justified their demands upon the Public. The decision to not inform me or send me a copy of the Guide was just another charade played out by the Solicitor General, Martin, Howie, Dobbs, and their colleagues. Just another charade to stonewall concerning their illegal policy and its killing and their abhorrent behaviour toward Life itself. Just another charade proving their abhorrent behaviour toward Canada.

My point is, yes, over the past ten years one can see the mindset of the corrupt, ignorant, and cowardly Politicians and the absolutely corrupt Senior Public Servants concerning their illegal policy and what they have done to hide it from the Public. And now Martin has increased his deviant behaviour, his psychopathic behaviour, from the hands off, or a step away from the actual killing, to the personal level, to attacking me personally, to have his hands on the subject and discover nothing happened to him when caught. It's a big step in anti – Social behaviour to now attack a person on the personal level.

My point is, we need to ask what his next personal attack will include. I'm to be Road Kill, while I walk, as he's had his spies spying on me and he knows I walk. That's how it will be done, Martin or his murderous friends will be a step away from the killing, as he is only a step away from the Overcrowded Emerge killing and those waiting for surgery, and this hands off approach has been successful in the past, so he will continue with his success.

My point is, again, time allows you to see the increase in deviant behaviour coming from these people and those in the background, such as lawyers from the Attorney General's Office that have given advice of stonewalling, protection, etc.

To understand this escalation of deviant behaviour I have placed my letters, like this one, on a blog site, as it now takes long letters; www.2diabetes.blogspot.com

My point is, corruption is present in all places but its only Time that allows it to express for all to see. Time and the gloating within corruption also allows one to understand the increase of deviant behaviour due to the protection of other Gang members and the fear of Others. These are Gangsters and Traitors, they're Monsters that may live next door to you.

*

Deviant behaviour increases to Seniors

So, S G Bond, you tried to shuffle your responsibilities back to the BCHRT concerning my first discrimination complaint, the promises your Office made, which the OSMV staff consciously broke. And all the while, you and your lies, with your contrived charades to stonewall and deceive, your illegal policy continuously kills and maims 24/7. Yes, S G Bond, you and your colleagues have constructed a real Human Horror, a Crime Against Humanity, and people are afraid of you, so now you're illegally hunting, stalking, and attacking another vulnerable minority, Seniors, and you've gone too far.

*

Leading up to Crimes Against Humanity

Reader, if Martin kills me you need to know the following. Let me set you up again.

Solicitor General Bond, when the OSMV staff and Howie broke the Crown Settlement Agreement they then had the Attorney General's Office, Hunt, and their private counsel, Iyer, play a charade to cover up the breach, blame others, and pretend they made an amendment to the breach. This was a real nasty lie your staff contrived, not just a little lie of convenience. They covered – up a breached Crown Settlement Agreement and when I complained of this to the Attorney General at the time also buried it. Yes, the paper trail is there.

Let me be very clear here, S G Bond, you lied about the authenticity of the “Crown” Settlement Agreement, that I agreed to. You lied that the “Crown” Settlement Agreement was between the BCHRT and myself, therefore any demands I had of your Office and the Murders and Traitors in your Office and the Office of the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles, that contrived and run these policies, should be sent to the BCHRT. Your lie tried to make it seem as if my first Discrimination Complaint was managed by the BCHRT, but you know I withdrew my Complaint, as your Office offered promises of change to Public Policy for withdrawal; that's what Human Rights Discrimination Complaints are all about, change to peoples behaviour, for the positive; through approachability, accommodation, and compromise. However, your behaviour, Martin, Howie's, your colleagues, and supporters has worsened; time has exemplified this.

It really has been something to watch and be involved in as you've discovered Canada is afraid of you and your Nazis Senior Public Servants and their killing and maiming, their Hate, Bigotry, and Prejudice. You learned you could attack another minority if you wanted, for no good reason, and these Nazis have begun their attack on Senior drivers. (Nazi defined below, p 18.)

My point is, congratulations on your Christian Humanitarian actions. I mention Christianity, as she played Christians for their vote.

My point is, the public should know you offered and paid me $3000 for Damages and Injury to Dignity and Self – Respect, reimbursed my Drivers' Medical Examination fees, and offered changes to Diabetic Policy being the most important promise, as there was and still is no Science to justify the policy, little lone is Harm.

That's what my Discrimination Complaint was about and still is; change of policy that is not legal and does nothing but harm the Diabetic and Society.

Change, to stop the illegal policy if you cannot fulfill the demands of our Charter of Rights and Freedoms, the Human Rights Code, and the Motor Vehicle Act; therefore fulfilling the demands guaranteed by Government.

Changes to policy were promised, the Guide being one, where I Reviewed a Draft of a Policy to Be, a Policy, and then another Draft. That was late 2006 and early 2007, where I leaned from the Policy and last Draft, the Review exercise was just that, an exercise in stonewalling, as changes to the Policy and Draft were just superficial, as headings and paragraphs were cancelled or just moved about to feign change. And whom ever wrote those papers never fulfilled the demand of the Charter, the Human Rights Code, and the demands of the Motor Vehicle Act and they knew it. And all the while the killing continued. And S G Bond, you, your Office, Martin, Howie and your supporters were lying to the Public, ICBC, the RCMP and other police forces that the “Notice of Prohibition” was legal.

Your lie means you have mislead, misinformed, and misrepresented what Politicians and those corrupt Government Senior Public Servants are doing concerning your illegal policy and the phoney Guide. Lying is a breach of Oath of Office and a breach of Trust, both crimes with jail time, as the criminals involved in the insider sale of information, concerning the sale of B C Rail, discovered.

My point is, liars and thieves' behaviour impacts many things, as just noted above. Connections need to be made to the lawyers in the A G Office that were playing the charade with the breached Crown Settlement Agreement, as it exemplifies how corrupt the A G Office really is. It exemplifies the idea of Group – Think of Wrong – Thinking; explained below. This charade concerning the breached Crown Settlement Agreement is another Breach of Trust between Government and Public and the lawyers involved should have been fired for doing this. It's the same corrupt lawyers involved in the insider information corruption considering the sale of B C Rail. That corruption saw those involved found guilty of breach of Oath of Office and breach of Trust, sadly to say they only got two years of house arrest, and only after eight years in court. They're now trying to get Government to pay their legal bills.

These are the same lawyers protecting their colleagues, but this time in the Solicitor General's Office, during the same time of my initial Inquiry of 2002 – 2004, of my first Discrimination Complaint, 2004 – 2006, where they breached their Crown Settlement Agreement, then the charade was played out to cover this up. They were also involved in the cover – up of the non – Reimbursement of DME fees to all Disabled Drivers, as the S G Office reimbursed my fees and I asked why not other Disabled Drivers and the S G Office would not respond to this question, so I lodged another BCHRT Discrimination complaint only to be told by the BCHRT that all those other Disabled Drivers did not need to be Reimbursed their fees, even if the S G Bond voluntarily reimbursed my fees.

These are the same lawyers that protected S G Bond, Martin, Howie, and Dobbs from the theft of Science and breach of Oath and falsification of Affidavit, and Mail fraud concerning this, the breach of the Guide, and now the attack upon Seniors.

My point is, the idea used to explain this behaviour is corruption begets corruption. This Group – Think of Wrong – Thinking only happens if all support each other and deny what they are doing by spreading lies and attacking people to show who's Boss. Gangsters being Gangsters, gangsters protecting each other.

My point is, don't forget, I haven't done anything to these people, nor have you.

Questions, “Why do they kill and maime your friends in Emerge?” and “Why do they break the Law?” and “Why do they break the Laws of Humanity?” and “Why do they shuffled taxes to pay for this illegal policy, where the consequences of that creates long wait – times for surgery, or you need to buy your own surgery as I did?”

Questions, “If you knew your behaviour was harming people, killing and maiming, would you continue on?”

Answer, “There are no 'maybes' here, you are not allowed to be 'Agnostic', to be undecided, as are decisions concerning God or Gods. This is about killing people. You are not at war, but in a peace time.” “Would you continue on, Yes or No?” and “Would you kill a 120 people a year or more?” and “How many maimed is acceptable?”

S G Bond, Martin, Howie, and their colleagues behaviour is a Crime Against Humanity, as the policy is not needed, it harms, continuously, with prejudice, denigrates the minority and harms society. It's based upon not allowing me my Charter Rights and Human Rights, it harms my Dignity and Self – Respect; the factors used by the United Nations to describe a Crime Against Humanity. Even if it was needed are we really allowed to kill to enforce a policy with an Intervention that is known to kill and maime? Not in a Democracy you're not.

*

S G Bond, you and your staff are lying. You lie to stonewall, hoping I'll go away. You stonewall and lie hoping you'll retire and go away, or that you'll be transferred to another Ministry and leave your killing and maiming to the incoming Solicitor General, as happened to you, that your corrupt staff will retire and go away and never be held accountable. You lie concerning your Office's illegal policies and the harm, covering – up the breached Crown Settlement Agreement, falsification of documents, the theft of Copyright protected scientific research, the breach of Affidavit to make is seem as if the use was legal. You lie to cover – up the fact you mistakenly wrote you know of the harm, the killing and maiming of the naïve bystander in Emerge and those waiting for surgery.

It's no wonder you, your staff, and the A G lawyers worked so hard to cover – up your behaviour, the illegal policy, the breach of your commitment to send me the Guide, and Martin's personal attack, assault, and defamation of my character for exposing his illegal policy to ICBC, where you didn't fire him for this, which means his psychopathic and sociopathic behaviour has been reinforced again.

My point is, the idea of moving on, willingly leaving pollution to the incoming S G defines irresponsibility and unaccountability, defines a lack of Honour, leading to the belief you are above the “supremacy of God and the rule of law”, which exemplifies a complete Disrespect for Life and the descent to “Crimes Against Humanity” as acceptable.

*

By not sending me the Guide, it's an admission that the Guide does not do what it's supposed to do, fulfill the demands of the Charter, the HR Code, and your own Motor Vehicle Act, therefore fulfilling your Oath of Office. This means the Guide does not fulfill these demands even though your Office and the OSMV hired an “academic researcher”, Dobbs, to justify the policy at any cost. Your lawyers must have promised her protection for doing so.

Dobbs' previous actions, the theft of Scientific research and breaching her Oath and falsifying an Affidavit, remove her from the Scientific Community of someone with Good Standing, Status, Prestige, and Bona Fide (ness). She willingly gave up what made her. Her behaviour removes her from the World Rules and Regulations of Scientific Inquiry and the Scientific Method of research and science and defines her as a Nazi “academic researcher”, as she's breached all Rules knowing her support is used to justify “Illegal Policy concerning Humans”, policy known to harm Humans.

My point is, if this Disabled Policy, the Diabetic Policy, is Reviewed correctly, through the World Rules and Regulations of Scientific Inquiry and the Scientific Method, it really is an Un – Sanctioned Human Experiment. Dobbs knows that her support does not fulfill the demands of the “democratic society” of Canada, therefore she is not a democrat, but something else. She's tried to cover – up an Un – Sanctioned Human Experiment that kills and maims Humans, and she knows this.

My point is, Nazi is not a very nice term to define someone with. When Dobbs agreed to do what she did, she did fall from Grace. I'm the Democrat not her. The things she's done for money, pension, power, twisted prestige, status, and fame, and knowing the consequences of her actions, defines her as a Nazi.

My point is, Democracies need to allow Communists and Socialists, on the left side, and Fascists and Nazis on the Right side, or our political choice, but I do not need to be quiet about them. Democracy is hard to keep and needs constant work to implement, and these people, S G Bond, Martin, and Howie and people of science like Dobbs, care nothing for the Democracy of Canada.

Dobbs puts herself on a Pedestal, the Government puts her on a Pedestal, as the Great “academic researcher”, that's going to resolve everyone's problems, and write a Guide to Driving, proving the Disabled Drivers are such a Pariah they need extra management. However, it's such a travesty of Science and Social Policy she's afraid to have someone Deconstruct it for validity, soundness, and bona fide (ness). Don't forget, according the Martin, Howie, and Dobbs she should have only been reviewing an existing Policy that should have been written in 1996, the year the MVA was revised. However, through “time”, we have come to understand the policy is only based upon some corrupt Senior Public Servant's “view” of life, because there was no science to justify the policy then or now and that's why Dobbs stole two hundred articles and played the game of bombard the reader with supposedly bona fide Science, coming from a supposedly bona fide “academic researcher”, in order to bamboozle the reader to get her way.

*

Dobbs' Persuasive writing

My point is, Dobbs writes Persuasive papers, not Scientific papers, although she wants readers so believe her work is Scientific. Presenting stolen work is Persuasive writing not Scientific writing.

Secondly, she is not writing Informative papers, as she's lying, and lying is not informative, it's Persuasive writing.

My point is Dobbs is abusing all readers and abusing her Status, Prestige, and Power, that comes with the employment and affiliation with the University of Alberta, Edmonton, (U of A).

*

Question, “Why didn't Dobbs work as hard as she says she works, in the Opening of her BCHRT Presentation, done under Oath of Affidavit, to guarantee I received her Guide, as it really is supposed to be a seminal work, or the first bona fide work, proving a Need for the diabetic driving policy and all other medical conditions supposedly monitored for the benefit of the Public, proving the Intervention, the DME, can do what its alleged to be able to do, proving the Consequences are acceptable, and that there is Good?”

Answer, “Dobbs didn't send her supposedly best and biggest work of her life, as it's just noise.”

My point is, if it was being presented for her PhD or for a Peer Review of a paper she would not send it in; if she did she'd be dismissed as incompetent or corrupt. That's the reality concerning her choice to not send the Guide to me.

My point is, it must be remembered that I Deconstructed her Draft, then her Policy paper, and her second Draft, and exposed them for what they were, just noise, presented under a formal government, medical, and scientific format to bamboozle the reader that all was valid and bona fide. They were excellent examples of failed Persuasive papers. Dobbs learned a lot about me from my Informative work. I then Deconstructed her BCHRT Presentation to the extent it was withdrawn; it was an excellent example of failed corrupt Persuasive paper.

My point is, if Dobbs presented the BCHRT Presentation, as a U of A paper, she would have been fired, and she knows this.



Imagine Dobbs Hate and Loathing of me, a non – PhD destroying her presentation to that extent. Imagine the Hate and Loathing toward me for taking her off her Pedestal. Imagine the Humiliation of failing a presentation to some diabetic.

So, as Dobbs has placed herself on a pedestal, which she returns too, as it's just a dream, she used that again to contrive something in a fantasy world; she's written the Guide, expecting to again prove something with nothing; doesn't this define Insanity? But then, she didn't send it, did she. No, she knows her work cannot justify the policy and its consequences; she knows what she's trying to cover – up with more lies and fantasy.

Dobbs knows she's supporting a Crime Against Humanity and is hiding from the declaration, hoping I won't notice her actions.

My point is, never forget, corrupt Science is used to justify Crimes Against Humanity.

Question, reader, just above I talked about acknowledging Scale and Big Ideas, and making Connections, “What do we label the Senior Public Servants in Ottawa, as that's what RCMP are, that know all this is going on and said there is nothing they can do?” and “Didn't they just sign a twenty year Crown Employment contract with S G Bond?” and “Is this a cover – up for S G Bond and Dobbs?”

My point is, no one needs to accept or believe what this corrupted “academic researcher” presents. These are Big Ideas of Science that Dobbs has corrupted. Dobbs has also corrupted the Scale of Trust of Science and of the Senior Public Servant. Dobbs' behaviour and actions are no different than Nazi doctors and academic researchers that experimented on Jews, Gypsies, those they didn't like, and the Disabled before and during World War II. For this “academic researcher” to do this informs me she has severe mental health issues. Dobbs fits in with this Group – Think of Wrong – Thinking that runs the Solicitor General's Office. S G Bond, somewhere and somehow you were also changed by this sickness that Martin and Howie have contrived and support.

S G Bond, I don't need to be quiet about your irrational, Anti – Social, Anti – Democratic, Anti – Life Behaviour and Malicious and Denigrating Acts against British Columbia, Canada, the Disabled, and me.

My point is, reader, this act of hiding the Guide from me is more than a simple mistake or forgetfulness, it exemplifies S G Bond, Martin, Howie, and Dobbs' “Severe Mental Health” issues and how disturbed they really are.

*

A “Crime Against Humanity” leading to “Democide” and “Genocide”

The illegal Disabled Drivers Policy

The Wholeness of the corruption that I've found myself within can best be described by the term Democide; large numbers of the Public killed by Government Policy and this Policy is known to be illegal and kill and maime.



Solicitor General Bond, your online resume states you worked with children. If you treated children this way you'd be charged with Child Abuse. You also state you support and work with Christian organizations, which means you have Morals and Ethics, as well as your Ten Commandments.

Question, “Where are they now?”

My point is, I think you're a weekend Christian and just played the Christian vote in our Riding to get elected. Full time or weekend Christian, you've consciously broken with your Morals and Ethics and Christian ideals.

Your actions, and we must include Martin and Howie, your staff and your supporters, or those pulling your puppet strings have constructed and implemented an illegal policy and participate in acts that are a Crime Against Humanity, as your actions strip people of their Democratic Rights, their Human Rights, their Dignity and Self – Respect and their Lives. And most importantly you and your buddies know you're doing this.

My point is, your illegal disabled policy is Not Genocide, as you are not killing those you hunt. Your illegal behaviour kills and maims the naïve bystander and you know this. You are Hunting the disabled and diabetics, as you have not proved a Need to manage this Class of People, you have not proved the disabled are a Harm to society, so you lie and steal in order to declare these people as wanting, turning the disabled into the Social Pariah, which then needs Government intervention at any cost, in your mind, even if you kill and maime a few naïve bystanders.

My point is, you do not kill those you hunt, which means the hunting and killing is Democide, not Genocide.

*

“DriveAble Assessment Policy”

S G Bond, your new attack against Seniors is another Crime Against Humanity, but will be understood as Genocide, as you will be killing those you are hunting. Your hunt is being played out by your Nazi “academic researcher” and her husband, within an Un – Sanctioned Human Experiment, with has not been proved to be managed by a Governing Body and a Code of Ethics. They are implementing this experiment through an Un – Sanctioned Psychological Instrument that has not been proven as Useful, able to do what it is alleged to be able to do, and proved Not to be Harmful. Their experiment is not a Legally Sanctioned Human Experiment but something forced upon the Senior and our “democratic society”, through more lies from S G Bond, Martin, Howie, and their colleagues.

My point is, S G Bond, what you are doing to Senior Drivers is the same as you have done to me, you have no Science to justify the policy or the Consequences, so you force your Experiment upon the Senior and Diabetic if they want to drive. Dobbs and her husband are collecting data by a twisted, sick, perverted, unethical, immoral method of misinformation and misrepresentation of what they are doing. They're lying to everyone that the collection process, through their computer toy, has been validated by previous Non – Human Experiments guaranteeing their data collection method can do what it's alleged to be able to do and there is no harm. The consequence of that sanctioned experiment then leads to a long term Human Experiment managed by a Governing Board and a Code of Ethics.

Dobbs and her husband are collecting data now to prove what they have said they can do; absolutely wrong and a Crime Against Humanity.

My point is, they're using Dobbs' research on Seniors, as she knows where Seniors break due to stress' and strains. They stress and stain the Senior to the breaking point, to measure the break in Cognitive status, to prove that their toy can do something, but they caused the Cognitive abnormality themselves, in the first instance. The Senior was not experiencing any Cognitive abnormality to begin with, only after the arbitrary, very Public attack and assault by S G Bond, Martin, Howie, and their supporters.

My point is, they unethically and immorally constructed a Cognitive abnormality the Senior never experienced until being attacked and assaulted, just as Martin contrived and implemented the attack and assault and denigration of my character.



With diabetic and disabled drivers you have a G P administer the DME, which is a Un – Sanctioned collection of data to be used against them; I signed no document that informed me I was involved in a Human Experiment and the data would be used against me. It's an Un – Sanctioned Human Experiment as the data goes somewhere, someone is processing it, I've not been informed for what, and it's stored somewhere; all done in some twisted sick effort to justify the policy of the monsters in S G Office and the OSMV; to justify their sick perverted “view” of life.

S G Bond, today, you are now collecting data from Senior Drivers in order to prove there is a problem and that the psychological testing or Cognitive testing or more appropriate, Mind and Brian testing, can do what it's alleged to be able to do and that it doesn't harm. Dobbs and her husband should have done this somewhere else, with non – Humans as the subjects or clients, to see if it's needed, does Good, and does not Harm. Then Sanctioned Human Experiments managed by a Governing Body and their Code of Ethics, then the Public if needed.

My point is, you're collecting data to see if there is a problem and playing with Seniors Brains and Minds to see if your computer toy can do anything. Wrong, Wrong, Wrong.

This is what incompetent, cowardly, corrupt “academic researchers”, “Scientists”, and Nazis do to those they find repulsive, or to people they consider to have no Value and Worth, and people they have stripped Rights from.



My point is, worst of all, your Nazi “academic researcher”, your so called “Dr.”, studies Seniors and absolutely knows what influences, stress' and strains, that can and do kill and maime Seniors, the very things she and her husband use to justify their Experiment upon Seniors.

My point is, they set the Senior up, make them fall, step in to falsely and illegally study the Senior, and then claim they know how to rectify the problem, but it's a problem they instigated and they want to learn how to define it on paper; Dobbs and her husband, Martin, Howie and their colleagues are the problem.

My point is, this “academic researcher” and her husband have broken World Standards of Scientific Inquiry and the World Standard of Scientific Method of research. These people are monsters and now live off my taxes, which means they're government employees and under an Oath of Office to not kill, harm, lie, steal, mislead, misinform, misrepresent as to what they are doing. These people have breached their Oath of Office and the Trust between Public Servants and the Public.

Solicitor General Bond, your behaviour, with Martin and Howie's and your colleagues, has taken us into a Crime Against Humanity, defined below, with this illegal disabled and diabetic driving policy.

Your behavior has taken us into a Crime Against Humanity, defined as Democide, and as you have learned most Canadians are afraid to acknowledge this illegal policy and its harm, and as you believe you have gotten away with it, you've consciously increased your deviant behaviour with an attack upon another vulnerable Class of People, Seniors. This has taken us to the Brink of Genocide and you have no Right to take us there.

The first Senior or their partner that dies due to your Un – Sanctioned Human Experiment moves us into Genocide, and the killing will be expected by Dobbs and her husband, as she proclaims she's the expert in this field, Gerontology, and knows what stress' and strains break Seniors.

My point is, Dobbs knows her behaviour leads to Genocide.

*

S G Bond, you, your corrupt Senior Public Servants, and Nazi researchers have taken us to the “Brink of Genocide”

Your new attack upon Senior drivers, “DriveAble Assessment Policy”, is also illegal, as it's also based upon some twisted, corrupt, treasonous Senior Public Servants' “view” of life and not justified through the demands of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, Section 1, the BC Human Rights Code, Section 8, and the Motor Vehicle Act, Sections 25 and 29, therefore not sanctioned by anything legal, moral, and ethical.

It's based upon your and your colleagues Bias, Hate, Ignorance, Fear and Loathing, Disgust, Contempt, Bigotry, Discrimination, and Prejudice.

My point is, with the lack of Values this allows Dobbs and her husband to collect data this way, to see if there is a problem, which is needed to somehow justify the limits of his computer toy, as it has not been justified by previously Sanctioned by Non – Human Experiments, then Sanctioned Human Experiments; he's running his Brain and Mind Experiments on Humans, as he doesn't see Seniors as Humans, they're the mouse, rat, pigeon, or chimp, so he can hurt them if he wants.

To say the least you've again broken your Oath of Office. As stated above this policy is also illegal, it is a Human Experiment, not sanctioned by any approved Governing Body and a Code of Ethics. It is run by your Nazi “academic researcher”, Dobbs, and implemented by her husband and naïve government workers, which takes us, Canada, into an Atrocity against Seniors, a Crime Against Humanity, as their Democratic Rights, Human Rights, Dignity and Self – Respect have been stripped from them for no bona fide and Good reason.

Secondly, the fact the Experiment has not been previously proved to be bona fide and “not harmful”, to be able to do what it's alleged to be able to do, and has “not been” proven to offer any Good substantiates my Accusation of a Crime Against Humanity. With the first death of a Senior, due to the Experiment, the death moves B C and Canada into Genocide, as you've killed those you Stalk and Hunt.

My point is, it must be remembered that with diabetic drivers S G Bond, Martin, and Howie Classify them, Label them, give them a Number, force them to undergo a Phoney Medical Examination, and will Track them for the rest of their lives, all based upon some twisted, perverted, mentally challenged Senior Public Servants' “view” of life. You're doing the same with seniors, you Classify them, Label them, give them a Number, force them to undergo a Phoney Medical Examination, and will Track them for the rest of their lives.

But here, you do not just ask them questions about diabetes or their disability, you make Seniors undergo an Un – Sanctioned Psychological Human Experiment, an Experiment upon their Brain and Mind, that has not been proved to be Needed, to be Safe, to offer any Good, or proved to not Harm.

S G Bond, you and your corrupt colleagues have no Legal or Humanitarian Right to put us on the Brink of Genocide. My point is, Honourable Solicitor General Bond, there are places we, us Humans, do not go, we do not Experiment on Humans without the Experiment being Sanctioned by a Governing Board and a Code of Ethics. You do not run an Un – Sanctioned Human Experiment to collect data to justify your Senior Policy to prove the Intervention can do what it's alleged to be able to do; to solve or use to predict a predetermined mental predisposition or abnormality.

My point is, no matter how Small someone states the Human Experiment is and that they say it's not harmful, its still a Human Experiment, guided by Humanity, Scientific Inquiry, the Scientific Method , and Codes of Ethics. S G Bond those that say they can run a Human Experiment without fulfilling the above are Liars and Monsters and Nazis.

If a Human Experiment really is such a small and insignificant Human Experiment, force those playing the Human Experiment to prove the Human Experiment is Bona Fide and does No Harm, through the World Standards of Science and Research.

My point is, S G Bond, you and your feigned ignorance, cowardice, and corruption have taken us where we should not be. You are not above the laws of British Columbia, Canada, and Humanity.



Lastly, your new policy is Senior Abuse, which really is an interesting point, as the Federal Government is running TV programs to inform the Public of Senior Abuse and the RCMP is doing the same.

My point is, I also Accuse you and your colleagues of Senior Abuse.

*

Background to expose the above Corruption

“... the supremacy of God and the rule of law: ...”



As stated above there are very real problems with the Disabled Drivers Policies and the new Policy against Senior Drivers. As explained above and below, there's Group – Thinking of Wrong – Thinking , lying, theft, assaults, attack, and falsification of documents, etc, etc, all contrived actions to stonewall and to cover – up what some in Government are doing, done to save themselves from the Crime Against Humanity they know they are playing out. A Crime so terrible Canadians seem to be afraid to acknowledge this, which only reinforces the deviant behaviour of the corrupt Politicians, such as S G Bond, the Senior Public Servants, Martin and Howie, lawyers in the Attorney General's Office, and their supporters.

The following will expose the wrongs, those people and acts mentioned above, who are consciously trying to cover – up their Crime Against Humanity.



Lets begin with the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, as that's what our country is now run by. S G Bond, Martin, Howie, Dobbs and her husband and their colleagues have put themselves above God and Law;

“Where Canada is founded upon principles that recognize the supremacy of God and the rule of law: ”



(From the Constitutional Act, 1982, Part 1. Minister of Supply and Services Canada, 1987, ISBN 0-662-55569-4)



Reader, as you can see these people have put themselves above the “rule of law”, the Laws of Canada; which defines Treason at a minimum; they're running policy against the Demands and Objectives of the Crown. They broken Crown Settlement Agreements and contrived to hide this.

Additionally, they've put themselves above the “supremacy of God”, as they knowingly kill people. The consequences of their illegal policies express as the Overcrowding in Emerge, which kills and maims the naïve bystander and also kills and maims those waiting for surgery; these are the harms they've admitted to.

Harm also comes to those waiting for surgery, as taxes now pay for the illegal policy's demands, the phoney Drivers' Medical Examination, DME; the payment change came from my first BCHRT Discrimination complaint, but as the policy is illegal and offers no Good, the taxes should be used for bona fide demands upon the Universal Health Care System, UHCS, such as bona fide surgery.

My point is, that's right, the Solicitor General's Office and the OSMV did not voluntarily change this payment scheme, or practice altruism, and no one needs to show benevolence to these corrupt Politicians and Senior Public Servants when they state they did this to support the Disabled, to support those marginalized in society.

My point is, they should be charged with a Breach of Oath of Office for using taxes for their illegal and personal wants.



My point is, according to our Constitution and our Anti – Death penalty laws, God is the only entity allowed to kill or that has the Right to kill, for what ever the reason.

The people I'm confronting and exposing and their hidden colleagues are the Monsters of the Human Species and I do not need to be quiet about it. Their behaviour is a Crime Against Humanity, where it really is Democide.

Question, “Does God practice Democide?”

Too many people have been quiet about this and the Monsters have learned the people I write are afraid to expose them, which has only reinforced the Monsters' perversions leading to an increase in their deviant behaviour, where recently S B Bond lied about Crown Settlement Agreements, Martin's attack upon me, where she did not send me the Guide, and now the attack upon Seniors, taking us to the Brink of Genocide.

Question, “Does God practice Genocide?”

Reader, these people have become comfortable with the Crime Against Humanity that's why it's easy for them to attack a very specific, vulnerable Class of People, Seniors. Again, done without fulfilling the laws of B C, Canada, and Humanity, or respecting the “supremacy of God”.

*

Canada's “death penalty” was cancelled, so why are these gov't employees allowed to knowingly kill?

Canada's abolition of our “death penalty” exemplifies this belief of “supremacy of God”, of the “Sanctity of Life” and the “Reverence of Life” by Canadians.

Fact, Canada does not execute people anymore, or send criminals to a country that has the death penalty. We, the people of Canada, Canadians, decided that God is the only one allowed to kill, you can question this all you like, but we, Canadians, a small group of Humans decided our Democracy and “democratic society” are not allowed to consciously kill Humans under any circumstance.

Question; “Why is S G Bond, Martin, Howie, and Dobbs allowed to behave in such a manner where the consequences of their behaviour kills and maims and they know it, and it seems everyone in Canada is afraid to acknowledge this illegal killing, coming from an illegal Government Public Policy, where Government Policy is to Not Kill under any circumstance?”



These people are the monsters of the Human Species. They are no different than the monsters in Nazi Germany, that attacked the disabled and those they didn't like. No different than those in the former USSR, those in China, old Yugoslavia, some Arab states today, and in Syria today.

I don't have to be quiet about this Atrocity, Crimes Against Humanity, as it is an Abomination, and Canada is bigger than these monsters.

Honourable Solicitor General Bond, you worked Christians for their vote, you have thrown your Christian beliefs, Morals, Ethics, and Ten Commandments into the wind and turned your back on what makes Canada so great. If you really are a practicing Christian you have broken all the rules and you're going to burn in Hell for millennium. You choose to act this way, as if there isn't any accounting. You should stop doing what you're doing, and maybe your interpretation of God may show some Sympathy for you, as it is blatantly plain you care nothing for, or show Sympathy for those going into Emerge for care; I shudder thinking of going to Emerge; I went to Emerge as my daughter was there, it is not a very nice place to drop into, and its not the Doctors or Public's fault. You show no Empathy for the Survivors of those killed in Emerge and waiting for Surgery, or you would have put the illegal policies on hold, guaranteeing the saving of lives.

You have also Dis – Honoured the Ideal of Honourable.

My point is, All the people involved in this are failed Humans, little lone Politicians and Senior Public Servants.

*

The Guide

Reader, again, I was guaranteed a copy of the new “BC 2010 Guide in Determining Fitness to Drive”, which never came, it was published in 2010. A year after the 2009 BCHRT Decision concerning this lack of a Policy Paper legally justifying disabled drivers policies, I wrote Howie asking for the Guide, as she promised the BCHRT and me that she only needed a little more time to complete the Guide; a years wait was enough time to wait. The OSMV has had thirty years to write a Guide, and Howie, ten years, from my initial Inquiry of 2002 – 2004. So, instead of contacting me Howie contrived another hateful charade to deny me my Rights again; she stonewalled by flipping her lawyer at me.

My point is, Howie's lawyers are paid for by our taxes, so once again she's abused her Oath of Office, by having someone else do her work for her.

Reader, it's interesting isn't it, I'm the person guaranteeing Howie her job, as she's had years of work to actually fulfill her job description of guaranteeing that government policy is legal and doesn't harm, which she never did. She's lied about it all these years. So instead of firing her, she gets to finally fulfill her job description with the Guide, therefore her Oath of Office, and she hasn't completed this project. If it wasn't for me, Howie would still be screwing the taxpayer out of their taxes, as she has never done her job.

Question, “As she hasn't justified the Largest demand upon the Public what has she been doing for $200 000 a year?”

My point is, Howie contrived another charade to stonewall any Deconstruction of her Guide as she knows will come from me, as that is my Right. She's afraid as she knows her new Guide is just more hot air, as were the Drafts and Policy I reviewed, as well as the BCHRT Presentation from her great and magnificent “academic researcher” Dobbs.

My point is, Howie had her counsel respond to my inquiry of the promised Guide. Her counsel, therefore Government's counsel, told me to stop writing Howie, as the BCHRT Discrimination Complaint was still an active entity. That surprised me, as the Decision by the BCHRT doesn't specifically state this; it dismissed my complaint and said I would need to wait for the Guide, as how could it address Discrimination, if the Government did not have Policy Paper to evaluate for Discrimination.

My point is, this is a wonderful example of the Circle Argument, which I couldn't win, as the BCHRT initiated it, is the power broker, is in denial, has been threatened, and chose this response with purpose, that of cutting me off in their play room, therefore instructing me to go to the Supreme Court of B C, if I didn't like their Circle Game.

My point is, it's just great stuff to be involved in, except for the Fact that all the while those in the BCHRT know the Government is killing its own People.

That's right, the BCHRT forgot the existing demand upon the diabetic, the disabled, the Public, was illegal and that the Government acknowledged the harmful consequences of the policy, and that Howie just withdrew stolen documents and breached Affidavit. Now wasn't that Decision by the BCHRT a wonderful slight of hand and first – class kilo of BBB, or more eloquently, Bullshit. (BBB explained p 34.)

Question, “Who threatened whom for the Critical Thinkers in the BCHRT to play that charade?”



Reader, I understood this stonewalling as just another lie from Howie and her counsel, Iyer, the same lawyer that lied on her presentations, phone call, and who presented the stolen scientific research and breached Oath and Affidavit, and then withdrew it after I deconstruct it and her presentation. I did not respond to the letter, as I didn't consider a response to a lie worthwhile; it was just more lies and stonewalling covering – up Howie's illegal policy and its killing, her breach of Oath of Office and Treason. As I'm the one that's approachable, accommodating, and compromising, (bona fide values), and knowing I'm confronting corruption and murders I've practiced patience and waited; the good Canadian, eh.

Question, “Howie knew the Guide was available and had her lawyer lie, or did the lawyer direct Howie to lie, as she is a past BCHRT lawyer and grasping for fame and fortune with new employer, the 700 lawyers of Heenan Blaikie?”

Question, “Is this why the BCHRT did not find fault with Iyer's presentation of stolen material and breached Oath and Affidavit, with the Mail Fraud, and the Admittance that the policy was illegal and harmed?”



One needs to practice the above Values and patience, as I really am involved in Corruption, and the longer it runs the more arrogant and blatant those criminals become and the more open the corruption for all to see. Don't forget, my patience is not killing anyone, where their stonewalling is killing and maiming and absolutely abusing our Constitution and Canada, and they know this.

My point is, this means S G Bond, Martin, Howie, and their Nazi “academic researcher”, Dobbs, the one being paid to contrive this Guide, consciously did not fulfill their obligations to the Public, the B C Human Rights Tribunal Decision, their obligations and promises offered through their counsel, and me. Me, as I'm the person responsible for forcing Government to legalize a Public Policy that was only based upon an arbitrary “view” of life, and as we now know a criminal, murderous, treasonous “view” of life. My Discrimination complaints gave Howie her job and she hired someone to do her work, an academic researcher, as Howie is not capable of doing her job. Sixteen years without a policy proves her incompetence; since 1996, when the Motor Vehicle Act was last reviewed and changed.

Question, “Why does Howie still have a job with Government?”

Answer, “She's just part of the Gang and they defend each other.”

*

Knowing your Enemy

Reader, I was asked to Review a “Draft” of the Diabetic Policy to Be, which I Deconstructed for unknowns, it turns out to have been Dobbs, proving the policy was not needed? I Deconstructed a “Policy Paper” soon after, then another “Draft”, both torn apart for what they were, just bullshit, the triple Bs, or BBBs, (defined, p 34), coming from unknown people that used a standard form of Policy Papers; they looked official and scientific, therefore implied legitimacy or bona fide (ness), but really didn't offer anything to justify the Policy, the Consequences of the Intervention, or prove Good.

My point is, whom ever wrote these papers began their writing as if the Policy had been Proved to be Needed. And that the Intervention able to do what it was alleged to be able to do, that the Consequences were acceptable, bona fide, and not harmful, and that there was Good coming from the Intervention; that slight of hand was just a lie, it's just another charade of Deception.

My point is, that's how a Persuasive paper begins, with events presented as if already proved as bona fide. Immediately Persuade the reader with “matters of factness” to manipulate them, not facts to allow them to think about things.

The Drafts and Policy I was sent did not justify the Policy, its Intervention, the Consequences, Good, or acknowledge the fact I visit a General Practitioner for diabetic care that outweighs any Drivers Medical Examination Martin and Howie contrived to abuse and humiliate diabetic drivers.

My point is, what this means is, as Dobbs has written the Guide for Government, I deconstructed Dobbs' Drafts and Policy without knowing it was her; but she knew who I was and had read my letters to Government concerning this illegal policy and my Discrimination Complaint letters. By default, Dobbs needed to have read my material, as how else could she contrive circumstances to move around, or to feign acknowledgment and implementation of Needs, as to what I had brought forward that Government needed to fulfill before making demands of the Public; demands of the Charter, the HR Code, and the MVA and the demands of what I call the “Five Steps of Engagement”. (defined on p 38). All not attended to in her effort to Bamboozle readers, she just used the BBBs, or Persuasion, to manipulate readers and the Public with her Drafts, Policy Paper, then BCHRT Presentation.

Question, “How could Dobbs work the Enemy if she didn't read who I am?”

Question, “How could she work the Enemy that had questions powerful enough that she was hired to justify the Policy by any means?”

My point is, Dobbs consciously mislead and misrepresented what she was doing with the Drafts and Policy, as she knew she could not legally justify the Policy and its Consequences, so she wrote Persuasive papers that seemed bona fide due to her position of “academic researcher”, and the prestige and status that comes with that position, coming from the University of Alberta, Edmonton.

However, as Dobbs has not studied diabetes, hypoglycemia, and diabetes and driving she needed to fall back on her knowledge of 'Presentations' to carry the presentation; she used her knowledge of formating, layout, and the language of science and medicine to bamboozle the reader.

My point is, a government employee, governed by an Oath of Office misleading the Public is not acceptable and is breach of Trust between the Government and Public as well as a breach of Oath of Office.

My point is, two years later I Deconstructed her Presentation in my BCHRT Discrimination Complaint, where I exposed it for what it was, just more noise and lies, and it was withdrawn.

Question, “Dobbs has written another Policy Paper, called the Guide, and she doesn't send me a copy this time. Why?”

Answer, “You know why. The Guide does not justify the Policy and its Homicide, therefore the Treason.”

*

According to Howie and her counsel I was or still am the Complainant in the BCHRT Discrimination Complaint who was promised the Guide or Policy Paper and never received it. It's not my job to harass and bully Government to fulfill its obligation to the Public, to fulfill their Oath of Office; it's not my job to chase fools, murders, and traitors.

Question, “Their actions concerning this Guide exemplifies their total corruption through bias, hate, ignorance, fear and loathing, disgust, contempt, discrimination, bigotry, and prejudice, as how else can we, Canadians, explain this petty charade by those that played it?

My point is, Oaths of Office were consciously breached, as with one hand Howie and her counsel claim I'm still managed by the BCHRT Decision and on the other hand they break their commitment to the BCHRT and don't send me the Guide. This means they've broken the agreed upon Decision of the BCHRT, that they live by, and threatened me by, with their lawyers, by not sending me the Guide.

This means they've again breached their Oath of Office. This breach can be added to the other criminal activities, such as breach of Trust between Government, Politicians and the Public, and the Trust between Senior Public Servants and the Public. Again, concerning this Guide, they know the Consequences of their illegal policy, their Behaviour, causes killing and maiming, which has continued while they played a silly game of “lets not tell Jenkins about the Guide”.

How many lives could have been saved during the past two years if the Policy was just put on hold, as they knew the Policy was not needed, as I Deconstructed their “academic researcher”'s four previous presentations proving the Policy is not needed and asking how is the killing and maiming acceptable anyway?

Question, “Government is not allowed to kill the Public under any circumstance, so why are they doing it?”

*

Howie's Hate Crime

Question, “How do we explain Howie's act of not sending me the Guide?”

Reader, let me set you up again. You know I asked Howie for the Guide, as she had her lawyers write BBB for her to protect her. Remember, I'm responsible for this Guide, and her fear and loathing of me is real, as I exposed her, as the Senior Public Servant running this illegal policy and its killing.

I've deconstructed her incompetent, corrupt effort to justify her “view” of life; that she doesn't need to follow the demands of Canada, HR Code, and the MVA, as she believes she's above “... the supremacy of God and the rule of law: ” .

I've deconstructed her work four (4) times.

Questions, “How many times does it need to be done?” and “How many times is Howie going to present the same material and lies, or more importantly, 'no bona fide material and lies', in her effort to justify her “view” of life; the illegal policy, believing the lies and will someday justify her policy?”

My point is, doing the same thing over, over, and over again, expecting change, defines insanity.

My point is, this is not a silly mistake on Howie's behalf. She consciously continues with her game of stonewalling knowing the illegality, treason, killing, and maiming, so what it this new conscious stonewalling based upon? This seemingly small event, of not living up to her obligations to the BCHRT and me, the complainant, or more importantly, the Public, can be labeled as a Hate Crime.

Question, “How else is this action explained?”

Howie continues to knowingly run an illegal Social Policy, harm people, kill and maime the naïve bystander, use taxes for non – bona fide demands upon the UHCS, denying the Public taxes for bona fide surgery care, discriminates against me, forces an Un – Sanctioned Human Experiment upon diabetics collecting data for some unknown reason, the DME, which contrives and establishes the diabetic and disabled as the Social Pariah.

And then, she decides to personally attack me by hiding the work that's supposed to justify her “view” of life and the illegal policy. Don't fool yourselves, this act of defiance is designed to Harm, as you continue to see me as the Pariah. It continues to denigrate me by denying I have Charter Rights and Human Rights. Howie harms my Dignity and Self – Respect by not obeying her Official acceptance of the BCHRT Decision, which means she has again knowing breached her Oath of Office all done to harm me.

My point is, this seemingly small action is Harm for Harms Sake, which describes Hate.

Question, “Isn't this Personal Harm the same action as Martin did a year later?” As Martin escalated the harm to me from the Public harm, his illegal policy, to the Personal Harm, lying, falsifying legal documents, and cancelling my licence indefinitely, Howie has done the same. She has deliberately harmed me by lying about the Guide, having her lawyer threaten me with legal action if I ever contacted Howie again, and harmed me as Canada continues to view me as a Social Pariah, as I have not had the legal opportunity to prove I'm not dangerous, a threat to the Public, and responsible for Public Policy that harms society; in other words she's denied me my Charter Rights, Human Rights, and Rights under the Motor Vehicle Act and the Right that I have to know Senior Public Servants are fulfilling their jobs and Oath of Office without anyone watching. (Don't forget, Howie's lawyer lied that I am bound by the BCHRT Discrimination Complaint as the BCHRT decided not to hear my Discrimination Complaint until the complete Guide was published.) (Just more lies from Howie and her lawyers to complicate matters, just another charade to deceive, another circle argument to stonewall.)

This act of disobedience is consciously done knowing she's breaking the law by not fulfilling her obligations, of knowing the Harm to the Public continues, knowing my Deconstruction of her four efforts to justify the Policy and its Consequences has proved the Policy as not needed, and knowing all this she decides to Personally Harm me for exposing her and her twisted, sick, demented, perverted “view” of life.

Howie's actions are based upon Hate, as I've done nothing to her except ask; “As Deputy Superintendent of Motor Vehicles why are you doing this to me?” and her response was, 'in my “view” of life it's ok to do'. That's not Good enough in British Columbia and Canada.

My point is, Howie's known her “view” of life did not fulfill the demands of the Charter, the HR Code, and the MVA as she is not a naïve bystander, she knew she never fulfilled her job description by not legally justifying the policy, so she decides to harm the person that publicized her breach of Oath of Office and has been on her desk since 2002 – 2004, from my initial Inquiry. So, she's more than embarrassed that she's a Senior Public Servant that discriminates against the vulnerable, the marginalized, and the disenfranchized; the disabled and diabetics.

Think Scale again, this is not just about me, its about diabetic drivers, diabetes expresses to 10% of society and most of B Cers drive. It's about all the drivers Labeled and Classified as disabled, maybe 80% of B Cers or more, or 3 000 000 people, denied their Rights, and Howie knowingly did this to Harm those that are disabled.

Scale, prostate cancer is 9% of men, breast cancer 7% of women,( that's about 8% of society), 20% of us will have mental health issues and all are Labeled and Classified by Martin and Howie.

Question, “These four medical classifications represent approximately 38% of society, so when you add the other 96 medical conditions monitored how many people are being Labeled and Classified?”

Question, “So the real question is, “How many straight people are there driving?””

Question, “When you work this out, then understand the number of driver mishaps they have, through ICBC records online, and how many deaths they have considering the percent of the population they are, then ask yourself, “Who's the real problem?””

Knowing all this, remember how she has denied me of my Rights, knowing the Harm done to the Public and myself, how she has attacked my Dignity and Self – Respect, and how I've exposed her incompetence and corruption allows the Public to see how Hate runs her new attack upon my Rights.

My point is, Howie and her supporters have deep psychological mental heath issues, some are sociopaths and psychopaths, to do what they're doing, knowing there is no science or bona fide reason to justify the policy, little lone it's consequences. These people keep doing things over and over again, hoping the replay will bring change, but it doesn't.

Then they start stealing things in an effort to justify their behaviour; stealing and lying does not change the real world.

They have now Personally attacked me believing this deviant act will justify their illegal policy and “view” of life, through their bullying and brutality. This behaviour of S G Bond, Martin, Howie, Dobbs and their colleagues defines mental health issues.

The Guide was not sent as S G Bond, Martin, Howie, and Dobbs know it's just noise.

*

Why was I supposed to receive a copy of the “BC 2010 Guide in Determining Fitness to Drive?

Question, “Why was I supposed to receive a copy of the “BC 2010 Guide in Determining Fitness to Drive”?”

Answer, “It was a process contrived to stonewall concerning the illegality of the Policy and its Consequences.”



Firstly, this was offered by the Government, just another action of Stonewalling, to delay my Deconstruction of the Diabetic policy, as I had proved the policy not needed through the other four efforts mentioned above. Howie and Martin were hoping I would give up due to their corruption, or I would die, or become sick, or sick through diabetes, or just give up through attrition.

Secondly, the BCHRT agreed to this request to support the Government in its stonewalling. The HRT dismissed my Complaint for some unknown reason; unknown, as they knew the policy was illegal, harmed, and Howie had just been caught presenting stolen material, where she then withdrew the material, therefore her defense of the policy.

Third, the HRT stated they did not have any paper work to inspect, to deconstruct for Discrimination, and with the Guide they would have paper work to prove, to document, any Discrimination; the phoney Circle Argument. This was a lie from the HRT, they're also lawyers, as they actually had physical evidence, the physicality of the Drivers' Medical Examination and they had the physical evidence of paper work. The paper work is exemplified with the DME Form, which is automatically mailed to the disabled, filled out by a G P, then collect by some Public Servant and stored. The HRT just refused to acknowledge this physical evidence. Cowards all, as they crumbled under Nazi threats, and this cowardice is why there are Human Rights violations. Absolute cowards as no one was killing them, this is not China, Russia, or Syria, they were just threatened, and they could have exposed the Monsters like S G Bond, Martin, and Howie, but they didn't. They could have quit their jobs but they didn't. They're also responsible for the hundreds of Deaths in Emerge Facilities as they supported a Crime Against Humanity; they're Human Rights lawyer and they turned their backs on this Atrocity.

Fourth, the HRT agreed to this request of Howie and Martin knowing I would need to wait an 'unspecified time' for the Guide in order to Deconstruct it. Also, Deconstruction takes 'time'; it doesn't happen in weekend; my deconstruction of Dobbs BCHRT presentation took a month and was seventy pages and the Drafts were also deconstructed sentence by sentence or paragraph. When dealing with liars, thieves, murders, and traitors, one sentence a page is not Good enough.

Fifth, I would need wait through the lengthy “time – line' of lodging a HRT Discrimination Complaint, then the 'time' for an initial decision to see if my efforts are worthy of an investigation, then the time of a Discrimination complaint, etc etc. Sixth, this would take years for me to get the Guide, two extra years now, and then time to lodge a complaint

Lastly, it must be remembered the characters in these Crimes may have retired or moved on, as happens with Solicitor Generals, people in the OSMV, the Ministry of Health, and Premiers, and people in the BCHRT.

Question, “We, as a “democratic society”, are to believe the HRT was not threatened as I have been?”

*

What is needed to Justify the Policy

My point is, what I was directed to do was wait an 'indefinite time' in order to Deconstruct the Guide, to understand if the diabetic policy is bona fide, fulfilling the demands of the Charter, the HR Code, and the Motor Vehicle Act, therefore proving a Need for the type 2 Policy. And if I found fault, I could lodge another HRT Discrimination Complaint. All stonewalling of course and how do we define the behaviour of the HRT, as they knew the policy was illegal and harmful and the Government has just stolen Science, falsified an Affidavit, and sent the stolen material and breached Affidavit through the mail, which is using the mail for fraudulent activities and they buried this?

My point is, I reported this to the RCMP in Ottawa, as they have a Criminal Investigation Department, concerning Intellectual Property Rights. I involved the Ottawa RCMP, as the material was from the World, and it had been sent by mail from Alberta to BC, meaning it was Inter – Provincial mail fraud; therefore local RCMP did not seem appropriate. After months of quiet from the Ottawa RCMP, no acknowledgment of my material with a reference number, some unknown idiot in the Ottawa Office returned my complaint saying they didn't to stuff like this. I re – sent the material to someone else, where after months of no acknowledgment of the complaint or number for a reference, all I had was my Canada Post receipt, an unknown body reviewed my letters of compliant, decided they would not do anything concerning the theft of Science and other protected works, would not investigate the illegal policy and the harm coming from the illegal policy the B C Government admitted to.

Question, “Why did the RCMP in Ottawa bury all this?”

My point is, this is Government killing its own People.



Secondly, the Second step of my “Five Steps of Engagement” (defined on p 39) would demand the Guide acknowledge the Intervention, the Driver's Medical Examination, to prove it can really do what it's alleged to be able to do.

Third, the Guide would need to acknowledge the Consequences of the Intervention, which means the Guide would somehow justify the killing and maiming they've admitted to, to those naïve bystanders in Emerge facilities and of those waiting for surgery. I don't know how you do that in a “democratic society”, such as Canada or anywhere on this planet.

Fourth, the Guide would need to prove there is Good coming from this policy. That's right, Howie has never proved any Good.

Questions, “Doctors are not allowed to operate on anyone unless there is Good, so why does the Min of Health doctors and some doctors in the BCMA support this policy?” and “What kind of Doctors are they?”

Fifth, the Guide would finally need to acknowledge or Government, Martin and Howie, would need to acknowledged the care diabetic drivers give themselves, therefore the Public.

My point is, to NOT acknowledge this care is another Hate Crime, as by not doing so they lie to you the reader, the Public, that I do not care for myself, therefore the Public, therefore S G Bond, Martin, Howie, and Dobbs consciously rape me of my Dignity and Self – Respect. They purposely contrive me as the Pariah, something they can do with, as they wish.



My point is, my “Five Steps of Engagement” is an excellent Instrument for Deconstructing writings, and it can be seen as part of the World Standards of Scientific Inquiry and the Scientific Method of Inquiry and Dobbs knows this, as she's read my letters and Reviews, and my Instrument has exposed her corruption. Dobbs has previously complied to steps similar to my Instrument, her instrument is called the Scientific Method, done in the works she lists in her Curriculum Vitae.

My point is, this means Dobbs is forced to acknowledge what a client or subject is doing for themselves, as not acknowledging this could harm or kill the client or absolutely endanger the Experiment's independence, value, and worth.

Question, “Why hasn't Dobbs complied to the very World Standards that gave her her BA and PhD and that she uses for prestige, status, and power today?”

She states she's an employee of the U of A, which demands these World Standards always be respected and worked through, as it's a Research based University and dependent upon World Standards, and is adamant that all standards be fulfilled, especially by staff using the University's Prestige and Status, as a Power tool.

My point is, of course the Nazi “academic researcher” and those anti – democratic Politicians and Senior Public Servants I'm exposing cannot acknowledge that the diabetic or disabled do care for themselves, as then they would not be able to live out their Bias, Hate, Fear and Loathing, Disgust, Contempt, Bigotry, and Prejudice toward the diabetic and disabled, or live beyond our country's “rule of law” and the “supremacy of God”.

My point is, the Guide is more than just a Guide, as Dobbs is trying to establish with it's Title. It's the formal document that is supposed to justify illegal Government Policy and its Horrific Consequences.

*

Pride and Gratification through the Guide

My point is, S G Bond, if you, Martin, Howie, and your Nazi academic researcher, Dobbs, and all the others involved in this corruption had really justified the diabetic policy and its horrific consequences, and the other demands upon the disabled driver, you would have sent me a copy of the Guide for Deconstruction, as you would have been Proud and Gratified to present the first 'Policy Paper' legalizing Government demands upon the Disabled and Diabetic drivers.

Honourable Solicitor General Bond, you would have been proud to base the policy upon bona fide facts and non – harmful consequences instead of basing it upon some unknown corrupt, ignorant, cowardly, treasonous, bigoted, and prejudicial Senior Public Servants' “view” of life. You should have been elated that you and your staff had fulfilled the laws of Canada and Humanity. But you didn't. You still live by a corrupt, ignorant, cowardly, bullying, thieving, treasonous, bigoted, prejudicial point of “view” of life. You've again dis – Honoured the Honourable in Honourable Minister and don't deserve the position or any Ministerial position after this Prejudice and incompetence.

*

My point is, we, as Canadians can never forget the following. Dobbs stole Scientific Research and other Protected documents, and falsely presented them within an Affidavit in an effort to justify the diabetic policy. She did this with the full knowledge of what she was doing, and that the Government, the Attorney General's Office and the Solicitor General's Office, would protect her. Being an “academic researcher” she knows of Copyright, Intellectual Property Rights law, and Intent of Use protections devices, which she consciously broke. By doing so she broke World Standards of Science and its Trust and the World Standards of the Scientific Method and its Trust between Government and the Public.

By doing so she also broke World Standards of Science and its Trust and the World Standards of the Scientific Method and its Trust between Scientists, “academic researchers” and herself.

By doing so she also broke World Standards of Science and its Trust and the World Standards of the Scientific Method and its Trust between herself and the Social Contract of Trust; a World Idea so that we can live and not be looking over our backs for the Monsters all the time.

Question, “She did this for what?”

Answer, “ She didn't do this Scientific Inquiry nor for the Benefit of Humanity. No, Dobbs did this for full – time employment, for money and a pension, and a twisted perverted sense of prestige and status. She consciously gave up what made her, adhering to the Rules and Regulations of Scientific Inquiry and the Scientific Method, and then on the other hand presents a Guide supposedly based upon uncorrupted Science. Not likely. S G Bond protected Dobbs as she's been protecting all involved in this illegal policy.

My point is, Dobbs is just full of noise and is in love with herself as her Resume or Curriculum Vitae proves. At her age, as an “academic researcher”, and with this level of theft and lying she will not change. She has no credibility anymore, she burnt her bridges to Scientific and Social standing with her theft, the abuse of her colleagues and their work, and lies. Her Greed and severe mental health issues has consumed her and she will not change.

My point is, Howie has run this illegal policy for years and will not change. Her job description is to guarantee that policies are legal, bona fide, and can do what they're alleged to be able to do. Her Hate has consumed her with this childish charade concerning the Guide.

My point is, Martin has also run this illegal policy for years now, knowing it's illegal and harms. It must be remembered that last year Martin attacked and assaulted me and denigrated my character by falsifying legal documents to do so. He also falsified the “Notice of Prohibition” used to suspend and cancel licenses, used by ICBC, the RCMP, and other police forces in B C. His Hate has also consumed him with this childish charade concerning the Guide. He's a liar, thief, bully, traitor, and murder and will not change.

My point is, S G Bond protected him, as she's protected Howie and Dobbs. And look where this corruption has taken Bond now; more breach of Oath of Office, more lying, more Hate, Discrimination, Prejudice, and Bigotry and the killing and maiming continues.

S G Bond is not a naïve bystander to what she is doing and the above review is why they've hidden their so called “BC 2010 Guide in Determining Fitness to Drive” that's supposed to finally legalize their Disabled Driver's Policy and its Harm. Bond's apathy to the illegal policy and its killing, maiming, and treason, due to her arrogance and corruption has also consumed her and is again expressed with this childish charade concerning the hiding of the Guide. And now she's hiding her participation in the attack upon Seniors. S G Bond's corruption has also consumed her and she will not change.

Question, “Where's their Pride and Gratification of bona fide accomplishment realized thought their work, through the Guide?”

*

Old Way of Thinking

Question; “What is it, that they fear so much, that they've hidden the Guide?”

Answer, “They're not only hiding their corruption, killing and maiming, and treason but their Old Way of Thinking, based upon bias, hate, fear and loathing, disgust, contempt, discrimination, bigotry, prejudice, all run and justified by lies, bullying, intimidation, and thuggery, all based upon outdated Group – Thinking of Wrong – Thinking. These people's Thinking is Wrong. This Guide will not fulfill the demands of Canada and Humanity and that's why these people have hidden it, they've tried to hide their Old Way of Thinking.

Questions, “Reader, now you know what Solicitor General Bond, Martin, Howie, and Dobbs really are, do you think they have legitimized the new attack upon Seniors, done with Dobbs' husband's Un – Proven, Un – Sanctioned computer toy he uses to supposedly evaluate Humans' Cognitive skills and abilities?” (He's really just screwing with Seniors' Brains and Minds) and “ Do you really believe Dobbs' husband is legally Sanctioned to run a Human Experiment upon Seniors, done to prove his computer toy can measure Cognitive issues?”

My point is, S G Bond, Martin, and Howie will be using his data to cancel and suspend licenses even though Dobbs' husband's computer toy has not been proven to be able to do what its alleged to be able to do. And all based upon an Un – Sanctioned Human Experiment being played out, and only based upon the “view” of corrupt Senior Public Servants.

My point is, the Scientific Method of Inquiry was invented to stop Old Thinking, the Group – Thinking of Wrong – Thinking from being played out by corrupt Humans and their corrupt “academic researchers” and so called “scientists”.

My point is, Dobbs and her husband know they've deliberately shunned World Standards of Science. They've engaged in Old Thinking that puts them above the modern laws of Canada, the “principles that recognize the supremacy of God and the rule of law: ” and the World Standards of Science. As people involved in Science they are not above our laws of today.

*

The new Senior drivers' policy, “DriveAble Assessment Policy”

Lets define the new Senior drivers' policy, “DriveAble Assessment Policy”, for what it is; it's just another illegal policy, therefore Discriminatory to say the least. But it's much more, as is the Discriminatory diabetic drivers' policy.

Secondly, the “DriveAble Assessment Policy”, was 'dreamed up' or 'contrived' to control Senior drivers due to some Senior Public Servants “view” of life; it's presented as a Cognitive Experiment, (that means it's a Psychological Experiment, managed by Psychologists and their Rules and Regulations, and again supported by the U of Alberta, Edmonton).

But really, this charade, as that's what it really is after we disregard the manipulative academic jargon, it can be better understood as a 'Brain and Mind Un – Sanctioned Human Experiment'. It's an illegal Human Experiment, as it has not been proven to be bona fide by a previous or multiple previously Sanctioned Experiments, managed by a Governing Board and guided by their Code of Ethics, proving there is a Need, proving it can do what it's Alleged to be able to do, does no Harm, and offers proven Good. And where are the animal experiments, which must be done before Human Experiments?

My point is, this is the same Dobbs, the thief and liar, abuser and corrupter of World Standards of Science, of the World Standards of the Scientific Method, mentioned above, and now she has her husband running the illegal Human Cognitive Experiment and she's in the background recording the Perversions and Harm.

Question, “What do we label humans that run Human Experiments not Sanctioned by any Board of Governance and an accepted and proven Code of Ethics, that are running an illegal, immoral, unethical Human Experiment?”

By default they are not Democrats such as myself, as the rules of Democracy protect us so we don't to where S G Bond, Martin, and Howie and their colleagues have taken us; the demands of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, the Human Rights Code, the Motor Vehicle Act and Oaths of Office, and the commitment to the Scientific Method of Investigation all need to be fulfilled or followed before a Human Experiment can be carried out, little lone be used to implement some kind of Social Policy.

My point is, those not fulfilling these demands, the laws of Canada, Humanity, and Science are Fascists and Nazis, in this matter they are Nazis running Human Experiments for whatever twisted, sick, anti – Humanistic reasons they put forward to Rationalize their perversions, bias, hate, ignorance, fear and loathing, disgust, contempt, discrimination, bigotry, and prejudice. The Laws of Canada and the Rules of Humanity are here to protect us so we don't have Nazis and monsters taking us where S G Bond, Martin, Howie, Dobbs and her husband, and others in government have now taken us with this attack upon Seniors.

S G Bond, I don't need to be quite about Nazis living in Canada running illegal, Un – Sanctioned, immoral, and unethical Human Experiments, nor those supporting them.

S G Bond, you're allowing this to happen or did you instigate this Crime Against Humanity? One way or the other you've again fallen from Grace. You've again abused the term “Honourable”, used to describe and label Ministers in our democracy.

*

This “DriveAble Assessment Policy”, this illegal Human Experiment, against Senior drivers, is a Crime Against Humanity. With the first death of a Senior or their partner, due to the stress' and strains of this arbitrary policy the death will be Classified as Genocide.

It's Genocide Honourable Solicitor General Bond, as you are stalking and hunting Seniors, a very Specific Minority and Vulnerable Class of Citizens. Hunting and stalking them for no good reason; no proven reason at all, other that Hate and Fear and these reasons are not good enough in our democracy. This is being done, as is being done with the diabetic policy, based upon some corrupt, mentally challenged Senior Public Servants' point of “view”. Old Thinking and Group – Thinking of Wrong – Thinking has twisted all of you until now you're nothing less than Monsters of the Human Species.

*

S G Bond, your lack of Character, Cowardice, Ignorance, and Corruption has taken us, British Columbians and Canada, to the Brink of Genocide. You, Martin, that wonderful Senior Public Servant who attacked me and denigrated my character for questioning his policy against diabetics, Howie, and your “academic researcher” Dobbs and her husband do not have the Right to take us here.

Your indifference to the illegal disabled driving policies and the known harm from those policies has lead us here. My point is, your online resume states you have a couple of years of college, by default you know what Genocide is and how it creeps into society. You worked with children and reminded everyone of this to get the Family Vote. If you were this indifferent to children you'd be charged with Child Abuse. You worked with Christian Groups, inferring Christian Morals and Ethics, to get the Religious vote. Where are your Morals and Ethics now?

Questions, S G Bond, you have twins like I do, what are you doing? What kind of memory or legacy are you leaving for them? Or, are they Fascists or Nazis, so all this is ok to do? Like mother like daughter? Are you planing to die before you become old so this won't happen to you; a disability, diabetes, or becoming old and forced by Nazis to undergo an illegal Brain and Mind Examination? What about your parents and parents – in – law? What about the people in your Riding? Do they really know your policy is illegal and an Un – Sanctioned Human Experiment? Or, are you stating you think the people up North are stupid and simple, therefore don't know about such things as Discrimination, Genocide, Hate, Bigotry, Prejudice, and Senior Abuse, so you won't be found out? Do they know all your disabled policies are illegal and kill and maime the naïve bystander in the Overcrowded Emerge Facilities in your Riding?

S G Bond, if you don't stop this illegal policy and confront the Hate, Criminality, and Group – Think of Wrong – Thinking in your Office you will be given a name, a nickname, a new moniker, replacing “Honourable”, such as was given to the Nazi monsters in Germany, those who ran the death camps and perpetrators of Genocide; Monster of such and such camp, Butcher of this camp, Doctor of pain, etc, etc. No different that the death camp names that were given to those that ran the Japanese death camps in WW II, which my uncle survived, survived the Brain and Mind attacks also. What's your new moniker to be, “Bond with the Mother of Genocide” in BC or Canada?

My point is, I don't need to be quiet about people like you.

S G Bond, what are you doing for these psychopaths, sociopaths, and mentally challenged people in your Office and the OSMV? And what about the corrupt lawyers in the Attorney General's Office that say its ok to do, as it'll take years in court to prove any liability, as they did with the now criminals concerning the B C Rail corruption. It isn't ok to do, as they found out.

My point is, just as these lawyers, Senior Public Servants, have buried the Treason and Crime Against Humanity of the diabetic policy, the breach of the Crown Settlement Agreement I was involved in, that you lied about, the attack and assault upon me by Martin, and the falsified document concerning this assault, and the phoney “Notice of Prohibition” doesn't mean you need to escalate your behaviour to Genocide.

My point is, these lawyers giving you advice to lie and stonewall are just as corrupt and twisted as those running these illegal policies. These lawyers are lying to you as Homicide, Crimes Against Humanity, Atrocities, Democide, and Genocide are never let to rest on a shelf to collect dust. Even after your death you will be held accountable for the World to see, with your children and grandchildren to live with. And you're doing this for corrupt Senior Public Servants that have corrupted the past seven or eight Solicitor General's in as many years?

My point is, these lawyers are also traitors, as they're covering – up Treason, which by default means they are not covered by the Third Party Protection our Democracy freely gives them. No, they're lying to you about their accountabilities too.



S G Bond, you should have resigned when I demanded this of you, my letter of August 24, 2011, for not cancelling the illegal diabetic policy, (which of course we now know you knew the Guide had been published and you hid the fact), and for not firing Martin for attacking me and falsifying documents to do so, where I then discovered Martin had falsified the “Notice of Prohibition”, where he has ICBC, the RCMP and other police using this illegal phoney document to suspend or cancel licenses. Everything this Senior Public Servant is engaged is corrupt and he's proven to be violent. Violence begets violence and that's what Genocide is. Martin loves the killing now and won't stop.

My point is, these Monsters have learned they can run these policies against the disabled, move to Personal and Physical attacks, as well as Social and Emotional assaults, and have now escalated their perverted behaviour, their attacks upon Dignity and Self – Respect, to now include a Brain and Mind attack upon a very vulnerable Class of People, Seniors.

*

Reader, this needs to be recorded again, as Scale needs to accompany these Big Ideas of Corruption, Democide, and Crimes Against Humanity. Ten percent, 10%, of society is diabetic. Now add the percents of the other one hundred conditions that the OSMV states it monitors for the betterment of society. Seven percent, 7%, for breast cancer, nine percent, 9%, for prostate, twenty percent, 25%, for mental health conditions. All monitored and that's only four medical conditions.

Secondly, how many G Ps are taken out of service to fulfill the Drivers' Medical Examinations?

My point is, now you know where the people in Overcrowded Emerge Facilities come from; Emerge doctors continue to state 50% of Emerge clients should not be there.

Question, “Who are these people?”

Answer, “They're You and Me because our wait – time to see a G P is five to seven days, as 12 – 15% of G Ps are taken out of service to administer the DME.”

Question, “Where should they be?”

Answer, “They should be visiting a G P.” and “They may be the New Generation of clients that never have a G P because they are not available for new clients as 10 – 15% of G Ps time is lost to illegal Government Policies and as our population ages, by default, more medical conditions will express and more drivers monitored, losing more G Ps.”

Question, “Reader, are you really going to wait five days, for your Senior parents or your kids, to see your G P?”



Question, “S G Bond, how many people do you think the illegal disabled drivers' policy has killed in the Overcrowded Emerge facilities, as your office has admitted to knowing of the harm?”

Answer, “At only one death a month, (1), in the ten busiest Emerge Facilities that's over one hundred and twenty a year, (120) or over a thousand, (1 200) Naïve Bystanders in the past ten years.

Question, “And how many waiting for surgery have died, been maimed, or addicted to medication waiting years for surgery as taxes are now used for the administration of the illegal and phoney DME?”

Answer, “It seems not enough have been killed and maimed to quench the Nazis taste for blood and guts, as they're still trying to defend and Rationalize their policy, their way of life, but not honest enough to send me their Guide to justify their blood lust, and now they've begun on Seniors, another vulnerable Class of our “democratic society”.

Question, “S G Bond, you and your colleagues really believe the Senior Policy is legally justified?”

Question, “How many Seniors do you think this Illegal Human Experiment, an unproven Psychological Experiment, the Cognitive Experiment, the Brain and Mind Experiment will kill and maime, as your “academic researcher”, Dobbs, studies Seniors and absolutely knows what stress' and strains kill Seniors; the very Cognitive stress' and strains your arbitrary, socially and emotionally, immoral and perverted Human Experiment forces upon Seniors?”

My point is, you stress Seniors with the stress' and strains coming from your arbitrary Very Public attack and then say your Experiment is measuring their Brain and Mind to discover cognitive problems related to driving. Of course there are stress' and strains, as you've instigated and contrived the stress' and strains that impact seniors in a way that they've never been in such a position before; Public Humiliation, an attack upon their Dignity and Self – Respect, and trying to deal with the Fear expressed due to the arbitrary attack and assault and Fear of loosing one's mobility.

My point is, you've created a problem to supposedly measure, as the problem was not there, which means your Nazi researchers will be measuring Social and Emotional fear from Monsters, not the stress and strains of driving.

I don't need to be quiet about your illegal policies and their horrific consequences, your Treason, the Atrocities, your Crimes Against Humanity, and where you have taken us now, to the Brink of Genocide.

*

Information needed to carry on, just in case I am killed for defending Canada and those that are vulnerable.

Definitions of Democide and Crimes Against Humanity.

Reader, let's define what's really going on. This is British Columbia, Canada, “a democratic society”, quote from our Charter of Rights and Freedoms. This is not Russia, China, an Arab state, we are not Syria, or an un – Democratic state, or a Fascist or Nazi state where they slaughter and maime their own People to keep in power and entertain themselves. The term used to define this horror is;

Democide; large numbers of the public killed by government policy.



The Diabetic Driver's Policy is illegal and its Consequences are responsible for the inordinate number of Deaths in Overcrowded Emerge facilities and for those waiting for surgery and the Government knows this; they've written so. This is what I'm confronting and exposing. This is what Canada is afraid of and those doing the killing know this.

I don't need to be quiet about this and as these Traitors and Murders have continued on with their denial, escalated their stonewalling and violence, I continue to write to challenge and expose their perverted, criminal, anti – democratic behaviour and their anti – humanistic behaviour. They're the Monsters, not the Disabled.



The following comes from Wikipedia, quoting United Nations protocols; “Crimes Against Humanity”, “Democide”, a definition acknowledged around the world and term coined by an American political scientist after World War II, R. J. Rummel, trying to explain the horrors we do to each other, even in a “democratic society”. It's quoted Rummel stated;

“I use the civil definition of murder, where someone can be guilty of murder if they are responsible in a reckless and wanton way for the loss of life, as in incarcerating people in camps where they may soon die of malnutrition, unattended disease, and forced labor, or deporting them into wastelands where the may die rapidly, from exposure and disease.”



This defines the illegal behaviour of the BC Solicitor General's Office and the Senior Public Servants running the Office of the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles and their supporters, as this illegal policy and its killing and maiming is very real, and has carried on with not only three people involved, the Solicitor General (s), the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles and its Deputy, but others such as corrupt lawyers in the Attorney General's Office, and cowardly RCMP.

“I use the civil definition of murder, where someone can be guilty of murder if they are responsible in a reckless and wanton way for the loss of life, . . .” (from above).



I've used the following terms, Democide and Crime Against Humanity, in my previous letters to the Government, BCHRT, RCMP, and others, to explain the killing the government is doing, unless it really is First Degree or Second Degree Murder, as they know their illegal behaviour is killing. Or is the killing “death through indifference to human life” and “reckless endangerment to human life causing death”, as gov't knows its illegal policy, therefore their behaviour, is a Class of Homicide; as they are not hunting a very specific person but are killing the naïve bystander, which is Democide due to the Scale.

Reader, we should be absolutely clear that the Attorney General's lawyers have Classified this death, as have the RCMP, therefore the stonewalling and denial, even though the Ministry of Health and Solicitor General's office admitted to the harm.

Question, “Why did the RCMP bury this Atrocity, Crime Against Humanity, and Democide?”

*

What's with the RCMP?

Question, “What's with the RCMP?”

Answer, “Think Scale and make Connections.”

I complained to the National RCMP, as the theft of Science by Dobbs was Science from the World and it was inter – provincial, as she sent the stolen science and breached Affidavit from Alberta to BC; I complained to the Department that handles theft or breach of Intellectual Property Rights. At first, some unknown person sent my complaint and material back to me, in pieces, with a notation that said, “We don't do this”. That person is a liar and I complained about them but no one responded to my complaint about this incompetent person. The theft was investigated but the RCMP said an owner of the Science or document or the firm managing the protection devices, 'Intellectual Property Rights” would need to lodge the complaint, not me; so there was nothing they could do for me, and the complaint was now closed.

So, I asked the RCMP why they are not charging Martin and Howie with running an illegal policy that they admitted harms, that he has falsified documents they use to manage the Public, that his acts are Treasonous, etc, etc; they again stated there was nothing they could do for me, and the complaint was closed.

Question, “Government is allowed to break the law, kill and maime and the RCMP will not do anything to stop it.”

Questions, “Why?”

Answer, “These disabled policies are National, as I pointed out to the RCMP, which means whatever the killing rate in B C is, it must be multiplied by eight (8), as B C is only twelve, (12%), of Canada.” So, if B C is killing naïve bystanders, at a minimum of 120 people a year in Emerge, we would have approximately 960 a year Nation wide.

My point is, that's more than Mass Murder.

Question, “Do you really believe Emerge doctors call Press conferences for one (1) death a month due to Overcrowding?”

My point is, if the killing is one, (1), a week and not one (1) a month, we would see 52 a year per Emerge, x 10 Emerges = 520 a year in B C x the 10 years I've been inquiring, giving us 5 200 deaths due to Overcrowding, caused by illegal Government Policy.

And if this is measured over the ten years I've been writing for my Rights, that would be 5 200 deaths in B C x 8 = 41 600 naïve bystanders killed in Emerge due to the consequences of just the illegal driver's policy.

My point is, that's more than the recent Genocide in new the states of old Yugoslavia.



My point is, the RCMP buried all this. The RCMP in the National Office, Senior Public Servants that buried this are cowards and absolutely corrupt; that's why they didn't write a Report, where they would have needed to sign their names.

My point is, there is Scale and Context for Connections to be made here, as it is corrupt Government and murder. During my discrimination complaints, 2004 – 2009, where the RCMP decided the illegal policy and its killing and maiming was not worth while attending to, they were also challenging the B C Government in court cases and fighting for funding. It's interesting that at this time they were fighting the Attorney General's Office during the B C Rail corruption case, (the same senior lawyer that played the charade to cover up the breached Crown Settlement Agreement and illegal driving policies I was exposing). It seems they were also restricted by lack of funding during the Pig Farm killing investigation, and lack of resources into the missing women on the Highway of Tears, and who knows what else; maybe they were instructed to not get involved due to the cost and absolute gravity of the numbers of naïve bystanders killed.

My point is, the RCMP have absolute, bona fide, devastating facts of B C Government corruption and murder, that they have in their Files or Pocket; it's like a card that's held back in a game of chance; a card held back to influence decisions as one would negotiate one's position on the board or game of chance, because other players know you have this card.

All I write about is bona fide and documented. People and organizations keep such things for further negotiations, for what ever use; they think long term to protect themselves as some in Government do. This illegal policy and its killing of naïve bystanders really is a trump card for the RCMP, a very big hammer to pound cowardly and corrupt Politicians and Senior Public Servants with, if and when needed. Or, in every day language, the RCMP have a very powerful tool to Blackmail the B C Government with.

My point is, it's only recently the RCMP renewed their contract with B C, through the Solicitor General's Office. According to the Press, S G Bond abruptly stopped her negotiations with the RCMP and signed a twenty year contract.

Question, “Was there threatening actions by Solicitor General Bond, as we know the A G Office and the S G Office are absolutely corrupt?”

Question, “Threatening acts, as to cuts in funding, based upon the inordinate number of Sexual Harassment charges against the RCMP, and the numerous assaults, killings, and electrocutions of the Public by the RCMP, and the recent killing of a naïve bystander by an RCMP who fled the scene, only to drink more alcohol to cover – up the alcohol he had already drunk?

My point is, don't forget these illegal acts of S G Bond, Martin, and Howie have corrupted those I'm exposing and they really believe they are above the “rule of law”, which drives them to new atrocities, believing they are untouchable, so threating the RCMP is just another day at the job for these Gangsters.

My point is, threats upon me were acted out by Martin and his colleagues? Documents were falsified. The RCMP now know the “Notice of Prohibition” they use to suspend and cancel licenses is not valid, and just another document falsified by Martin.

The RCMP are playing with really corrupt people and they know it. The S G Office is full of absolutely corrupt people who have proved they can do these things without accountability, so it seems the RCMP are playing corrupt for bargaining power over corrupt Public Servants and Politicians.

But as with all corruption, Greed slowly overcomes them and it's this Greed the RCMP can address, as all the above has happened and they know about it, but have kept quiet, just growing their book of corruption concerning the B C Attorney General's Office and the Solicitor General's Office.

Question, “Did the RCMP counter – threaten the S G Office with their book of corruption?”

Question, “Did they say they would expose the illegal policy and all it's killing and maiming, if the S G Office did not sign the new twenty year contract , with perks and benefits for the future?”

Answer, “this is not 'Negotiating', it's called Blackmail.”

However, sometimes, when dealing with Monsters, monstrous things are done.

Answer, “I believe the RCMP stepped over the line and became Monsters like the Monsters I'm exposing.”

Questions, “Knowing all this about the illegal policy and its harm shouldn't the RCMP have had a go at the Corruption in the A G's Office and the S G's Office for running an illegal policy, as it doesn't need to be proved, as it's there, as is the acknowledgment of the Harm?” and “Shouldn't they have laid charges of Homicide, Breach of Oath of Office, and Breach of Trust, and Treason, etc etc?” and “ Shouldn't the RCMP made it Public, to defend themselves from the Public's deserving distrust concerning the RCMP, to build or regrow their poor Public image?” and “And now the RCMP know they've been manipulated by the OSMV with it's illegal “Notice of Prohibition” Form, used to suspend and cancel licenses, shouldn't there have been charges against Martin for falsifying legal documents, etc?”

My point is, the above is embarrassing and worth some retribution; cops using known illegal documents to do the work of “rule of law”. How many licenses has the RCMP suspended and cancelled using an illegal document, falsified by the S G's Office, Martin and Howie, and the A G's Office? And yet, they have done nothing to protect the Public.

My point is, the RCMP should have done their job and enforced the laws of British Columbia and Canada and set their hounds of hell upon these corrupt Politicians and Senior Public Servants, as they too will get old, may become disabled, may become diabetic and have colleagues and family enter Emerge facilities only to die or be maimed due to Overcrowding caused by illegal Government Policy.

Question, “Why didn't the RCMP do anything to protect the Public?”

RCMP, you've helped survivors of Atrocities, Crimes Against Humanity, Genocide, and natural disasters, and now you need to support Canadians and attack those committing Atrocities and Crimes Against Humanity in B C and Canada. Those same people have taken us to the Brink of Genocide, because you didn't do anything to them, you haven't even challenge them Publicly, so they know you're afraid of them.

Questions, “Why is it that you play TV commercials to inform the Public of Senior Abuse, and yet you haven't stopped the Senior Abuse concerning the Senior Driver?” and “Is that because it was in play before you Blackmailed S G Bond for a new contract and what was being played out was not to be touched as the disabled drivers' policy has not be exposed?”

My point is, a Big Idea of the RCMP is to also stop Genocide before it happens. You have no excuse for not exposing all the people mentioned in my letters and their colleagues.

But it's too late now isn't it, as you're hiding their actions for a twenty year contract. You're like Dobbs, the corrupt “academic researcher”, who sold and corrupted what made her, for financial gain and a pension, and a lust for power, and maybe some twisted affiliation of being close to Homicide, and Senior Death, as that's who she studies.

*

The New Horrors of Our Age.

My point is, Rummel and the World did not know of such crimes as I've found myself within, as defined above and below; “Illegal Driving Policies that kill and maime the naïve bystander, by the hundreds”, they're New Horrors of Our Age.

This is a modern Atrocity and Crime Against Humanity run by ignorant, cowardly, corrupt Politicians, such as Solicitor General Bond and absolutely corrupt Senior Public Servants such as Martin, Howie, their corrupt “academic researcher”, Dobbs, corrupt lawyers in the Attorney General's Office, and unknowns of influence.

This corruption impacts other Provinces too, as exemplified with the Investigation into the Brian Sinclair Emerge death, where the Government has tried to hide its illegal demands upon the Public, therefore the Universal Health Care System, UHCS, therefore its influence in the death. My letters to parties involved in the Investigation have exposed this cover – up and the Winnipeg Police really didn't like what I did. Too bad. I later discovered the police did not forward my letters to the Emerge Facility and the Nurse being charged with a Class of Homicide. I sent them the material and now they can ask the Winnipeg Police, running the Investigation, why they were not informed of information so important to the case the Winnipeg Police sent the RCMP to my house, as well as a nurse from the BC Mental Health division, to denigrate my character, as the Solicitor General's Office and Martin did with false accusations used to cancel my license. This charade was not a very subtle threat from the Winnipeg Police and RCMP.

Yes, the nurse gave me an 'A' for good mental health. However, I don't know if that's really good or bad.

My point is, S G Bond, Martin, Howie, and Dobbs and their supporter, believe they have Good Mental Health, as they see nothing wrong with running illegal policy that kills and maims thousands of people; I don't have the good mental health these Monsters have. “Do you?”

My point is, my letters were so important that the Winnipeg Police tried to denigrate my character, to establish non – credibility, by sending an RCMP, as a threatening instrument, and a BC Mental Health Advocate, and yet not important enough for all other parties involved in the Investigation to know about.

Questions, “What's that say about the bona fide (ness) of my writings?” and “What's that say about how corrupt the Manitoba and Winnipeg Senior Public Servants are, that the Winnipeg Policy tried to cover – up their involvement in not only Sinclair's death but all the other deaths and maiming going on in Winnipeg Emerge Facilities?”

Question, “If you were charged with Homicide, as the nurse is, don't you think you'd like to know the above and below and what's in the letters I sent to the Chief of Winnipeg Police, as he's evaluating you?”

The Winnipeg Police tried to cover it up, like S G Bond, Martin, Howie, the A G's Office, ICBC, the BCHRT, and the RCMP have done with this illegal government policy and it's Atrocities and Crime Against Humanity.



The people doing this to me, therefore the Public, Canada, are the 'modern monsters' of “democratic society” (ies) of the so called Developed Modern World. Our Charter of Rights and Freedoms states we're a “democratic society” and there are demands coming from this Constitutional document than need to be fulfilled before Government can stick it's ugly face into the Public's life; such as Section 1 of the Charter, which the Solicitor General of today and the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles and his deputy care nothing for, which also means they've broken their Oath of Office, instigated Treasonous Acts, as they're running Policy against the Demands and Objectives of the Crown or Government, as well as being involved in a degree or Class of Homicide. Charges of reckless endangerment causing death and harm and indifference to Human Life causing death and harm is a good beginning against these 'modern monsters' and their 'modern crimes'.

These Laws and Oaths are there for Government and Public Servants to fulfill and live by, not just something to control the Public with. Don't forget, the Public invented these Laws and Oaths to manage Politicians and Senior Public Servants, not the other way around as these Politicians and Senior Public Servants are trying to reverse. They can move to Syria, Egypt, or Iran and do their killing there, where they'll be applauded by the Monsters running those countries.

*

Reader, the Grandness of this crime, making it Democide, is understood through the demands of the illegal Diabetic Drivers' Policy and it's consequences, as it's not just me, as diabetes is now ten percent, (10%) of our society, and now add the other one hundred medical conditions the OSMV states it monitors for the betterment of society and you now have Scale to understand how Grand this Crime is and how many are being killed and maimed.

Scale allows one to understand the Grandness or magnitude of the illegality and corruption and its consequences upon the Public and the UHCS; this is not just about me as a diabetic driver. When Scale is applied to these driving Policies, all the medical conditions monitored, it may be seventy – five percent, (75%) of the population that is abused.

And all are forced to undergo phoney medical examinations and now you know where G Ps disappear to and why their clients go to Emerge for medical care. Additionally, G Ps are forced to administer the DME and fill out these useless forms.

Secondly, the Harm harms all Canadians through the failing of our UHCS.

Third, the Harm harms all Canadians as the demands of the Charter, the HR Code, and local laws such as the MVA are not attended to by Government and Senior Public Servants, who positions were invented by the Public to help manage our Democracy. These people were not given jobs to play above “... the supremacy of God and the rule of law: ”.



Reader, the following two Intrusions into the Public's life also need to be understood with Scale, as the Public attacked the Government for these illegal and heinous acts against our Charter Rights and Freedom of Speech.

These people in the Government Auto Industry, or different aspects of Transportation, placed Cameras in the Public space to monitor our movements; intersections and streets. These devices have been found un – Constitutional; breaching our Charter of Rights and Freedoms and Human Rights. Just recently it was discovered Senior Public Servants placed Listening Devices at border crossings to listen to the Public's private conversations, while they're sitting in their car or truck waiting to clear customs. This illegal act, a secret act, really is disgusting.

This came from Nazi Senior Public Servants, who care nothing for our Constitution, Human Rights, and Free Speech. Placing these devices in Public space was not a simple mistake, it was contrived to see if anyone would complain if found out. The Senior Public Servants that did this care nothing for the protocols of our Constitution or Canada; they are not the naïve bystander but Nazis, caring nothing for the “rule of law”. These people did not fulfill the demands of the Charter and Human Rights before they stuck their ugly faces into the Public's life. They not only attacked the Public but the Charter and Human Rights. These people need to be fired as Martin, Howie, and Dobbs need to be, and all other Senior Public Servants in the Solicitor General's Office. All have broken their Oath of Office and Trust between the Public Service and the Public.

My point is, these two Intrusions were placed in the Public's life and when discovered, they were withdrawn, as the Senior Public Servants that placed them there had no documents to prove these Intrusions to be needed. On the other hand, the diabetic policy has been contrived and the Public mislead, misinformed, and lied to about the legality of the policy. The Public needs to be informed the Driving Policies are illegal, kill the Public, and harm the UHCS and not needed, just as the Cameras and Listening Devices are not needed.

Question, “Why has this illegal driving policy, an illegal intrusion into our lives, as the above two driving intrusions are, just more intrusions coming from corrupt Senior Public Servants within the auto industry, not been cancelled as the Cameras and Listening Devices have been?”

Question, Important, “Those Intrusions do or did not kill anyone, not like the Disabled Driving Policy does, so how is the disabled driving policy justified by those in the Solicitor General's Office, OSMV, or Transportation Ministry in Ottawa?”

My point is, these acts are just another example of Old Thinking and Group – Think of Wrong – Thinking, by corrupt Senior Public Servants and their colleagues; people that care nothing for the “rule of law” or Life itself.

*

Why continue with the illegal drivers' policy?

A Review, disabled drivers are Labeled, Classified, given a Number, forced to undergo Phoney Medical Examinations, and will be Tracked for the rest of their life. The perpetrators of this Discrimination and Prejudice are the Solicitor General's Office and the Office of the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles, and they know the policy is Illegal, Harms, and is Not Needed; they know the Grandness of the Scale.

By default the Premier also knows, as she is supposed to manage all Ministries. I've also written Premier Clark, but she, as so many Politicians, just pass their responsibility and accountability to others, she has conformed to this corrupt Group – Think of Wrong – Thinking, in other words, Premier Clark has tried to bury this and feign ignorance, as S G Bond has done. This illegal driving policy is worse than the above Two Intrusions, as those two illegal, immoral, unethical government policies do not kill and maime.

Question, “They know the diabetic policy and other disabled policies are illegal and killing, they know the Scale, they know the Connections of the Consequences, and they know I care for myself better than their phoney Drivers' Medical Examination, and they've defended this policy for so long we need to ask, “Why?””

Answer, “It's because they are corrupt Humans, they are afraid to loose Power, no matter how many they Kill.”

Question, “What do they do to Rationalize their behavior?”

Answer, “They've covered up this policy since my initial inquiry of 2002, stonewalled about trying to justify the policy until they could find a corrupt scientist or “academic researcher” from somewhere in the World to steal research and lie, in an effort to seemingly scientifically justify their illegal policy, the harm, and their anti – life, anti – social, and anti – democratic behaviour.”

My point is, they actually did this and the thief, liar, and criminal is Bonnie Dobbs, an “academic researcher”, from Alberta, using the Prestige, Status, and Power that comes from being an employee of the University of Alberta, Edmonton, which begs the question;

“What kind of defense did S G Bond, Martin, and Howie offer Dobbs for her corruption and what renumeration?”



This same thief and liar, if I understand MLA, NDP, Nicholas Simons' Blog material correctly, is the person that put together the “BC 2010 Guide in Determining Fitness to Drive”, the Policy paper I've been waiting for. Waiting since my first BC Human Rights Tribunal Discrimination complaint, 2004 – 2006, where I reviewed a Draft of a Policy to Be, a Policy Paper, then another Draft, 2006 – 2007, which would cancel the first Policy Paper on diabetes. And now I understand it was Dobbs who wrote the Drafts and Policy; which I deconstructed as bullshit, the triple Bs, or BBB. (BBB's explained below.)

Of course the author (s) of these Drafts and Policy proposal did not state who they were, as the Drafts and Policy paper did not justify the Policy, prove the Driver's Medical Examination could do what it was alleged to be able to do, or acknowledge the Consequences of the Policy, or any Good, or acknowledge that I visit the General Practitioner every three months for diabetic care, compared to the one visit for the diabetic policy every five years, or address the fact that the DME really is an Un – Sanctioned Human Experiment.

My point is, they're trying to justify the policy through stonewalling, as the Public continues to believe the Policy is needed and has been legally justified and the Guide is just a revision of bona fide policy, which is a lie from the Premier, S G Bond, Martin, Howie, Dobbs, and their supporters.

Yes, they Bought a ringer, a corrupt “academic researcher”, who they promised a permanent job and pension for contriving a Guide, a phoney Guide, seemingly based upon bona fide Science, just as the Drafts and Policy papers were, which resembled bona fide Scientific papers and research, but in fact they were just hot air contrived to deceive and mislead the reader, as its coming from academic credentials such as a BA psychology and a PhD in gerontology, supported through the U of A's Research Status in the World; Dobbs' degrees and research field.

Dobbs' Drafts and Policy paper were failures as I deconstructed them for what they were, just noise; letting the writers know they were going the wrong way. For her next presentation, the BCHRT Presentation, she was forced to put her name on it, where she stole research and lied about the legal Right of use, using a position of power to carry the day, instead of facts and honesty as her PhD and U of A employment would have demanded.

My point is, it's interesting what she's done to people behind their backs isn't it.

My point is, the BCHRT Presentation would not pass a Peer Review if placed before her Peers for justification, as a bona fide research paper and study, in order to support a Social Policy, and its Interventions, as well as the Consequences of the Intervention. This was a gamble from Government, more stonewalling, as if I didn't confront Dobbs, the high and mighty, the Government's new “academic researcher” and her Presentation, it would have been accepted as 'what was to be needed' to justify the policy. If caught then they had got away with another few years of stonewalling, as the Government's lawyers would stonewall with inexhaustible resources coming from taxes.

Secondly, Dobbs' Peers would not allow their research to be used for a Foreign Social Policy that kills and maims, that's why she didn't inform them that she used their research. She knows it's international law and difficult to prove, contrived stonewalling on her part, as authors are also restricted by lack of funds for court cases.

Third, Peer Review, means Peers will also do the same experiment to see if what was discovered is bona fide and all further experiments produce the same result or the same conclusions are found that Dobbs discovered. Dobbs used her position to mislead about what she was doing.

Fourth, reader, “Peer Review” was invented to not only review what Scientists were offering, but to review for bona fide mistakes, as discovery is complicated, and to manage Scientists and “academic researchers” who's ego runs amuke. Peers do not just accept research or Presentations as bona fide solely based upon a Peers Resume or Curriculum Vitae. But this is how Dobbs has run this charade, run it with twenty pages of Resume or Curriculum Vitae, two hundred stolen articles, to shock and awe, to deceive and manipulate, and all dragging the U of A into the Presentation.

My point is, Dobbs' behaviour concerning her Draft, Policy, Draft, and BCHRT Presentation is the best example of why “Peer Review” was invented; to stop people like Dobbs from falsifying documents in order to make money and support her ego.

The refusal to send me the Guide has hidden their corruption for another two years and all the while they know they're killing and maiming.

My point is, they continue to stonewall to hide what they really are doing to the disabled, the diabetic, the Public, the UHCS, British Columbia, our Charter and local laws, and Canada.



My point is, after this theft of Science and breach of Oath of Affidavit, a lie, a charade to manipulate, all of Dobbs' Research needs to be evaluated for bona fide (ness).

Secondly, Dobbs should also be Blacklisted in the Scientific Community for stealing her colleagues research, using it for things it was not researched for, and for lying she had permission of use; used to justify a Social Policy that kills the Public. Third, and the RCMP said there was nothing they could do.

My point is, Dobbs, as an “academic researcher” is bound to acknowledge what a client in an Experiment is doing, so there is no harm to the client, or the clients' activity does not jeopardize, or conflict, or confound the experiment. Dobbs has consciously not acknowledge my diabetic health care. This means she has corrupted her presentation and it's not worth anything; but then again it is stonewalling.

My point is, Dobbs is now so corrupt she will not change and her Guide will not acknowledge my care, as she is again stonewalling for long term protection of her employer; the Government, S G Bond, Martin, and Howie.

Again, now you know why this policy is more than just Discriminatory, it's a Hate Crime, a Crime Against Humanity, and Democide. As Dobbs did write these Drafts and Policy Paper it explains her corrupt disposition and why she was hired. It explains why she then stole Scientific research and lied about the legality of the use, in 2008, which she presented in an effort to legally justify the diabetic policy within a BCHRT Discrimination complaint, where the HRT continued on with the stonewalling. Criminality begets criminality.

My point is, it seems I Deconstructed Dobbs' Drafts and Policy and then her BCHRT Presentation of stolen material, which explains why she would not send me the Guide. She knows she's a failure and criminal, but she also knows she's been hired to stonewall, which seems that's all she's really good at, other than the new attack upon Seniors.

Question, “What has Dobbs stolen and falsified in her effort to justify the Guide and the new attack upon Senior drivers with her husband?”.

*

I should explain the term Bullshit; the triple Bs, BBB, or Bullshit Baffles Brains.

Firstly, we need to stay on topic; disabilities or diabetes and driving, and the lack of, or more appropriately, no Science to justify the driving policy. And yet, people believe the policy is Justified, as Science is referenced as the Justifier.

Secondly, there are too many people are afraid of Science and its Methods of Inquiry. They just Trust and Believe that the Science offered is bona fide and researched for the matter at hand.

Third, too many are afraid of people with University Degrees, especially upper level degrees such as Doctorates and PhDs. They just Trust and Believe these people always follow the Established World Wide Protocols of Research, Peer Review, Referencing, and the fulfillment of Copyright, Intellectual Property Rights, and Intent of Use protection instruments.

Fourth, there is no rule that states non – Scientists are not allowed to Deconstruct what a Scientist or academic researcher presents. The Deconstruction of Scientific Works makes the work better and bona fide Scientists and “academic researchers” know this and welcome it.

Question, “Dobbs has deliberately hide her Guide from Deconstruction, what does that say about her work?”

My point is, she hid it even after having the Benefit of me not knowing it was she who presented the Draft, Policy, and another Draft, that I Deconstructed for her Benefit. This gave Dobbs all the information she needed to contrive a paper, which would feign attention to the demands I was basing my Discrimination Complaint upon. She would play the Science charade, bamboozle the reader with bullshit, and lots of it, to mislead and stonewall.

My point is, as with bona fide experiments, there needs to be a Blind, where the client doesn't know if he or she is getting a drug or sugar, eliminating fear, bias, and prejudice. In a sense, Dobbs set – up a blind evaluation of me; as with drugs, there is the drug and then some clients have a placebo, a sugar tablet. Here, I didn't know who was presenting, which hopefully gives an unbiased Review of her Drafts and Policy; I chose to Deconstruct them, which is different. Dobbs knows that she benefited by this charade. She learned who her enemy was. Don't forget, she was hired to write a Policy Paper or Guide because I demanded the Government explain itself, to obey their Oaths of Office and fulfill the demands of the Charter, the HR Code, and of course the Motor Vehicle Act. She needed to know who the enemy was, in order to win.

With the BCHRT presentation she was forced to place her name on it and yet I did not make connections to the Drafts and Policy; why should anyone. But knowing the name, and it being an “academic researcher”, who did what she did, the theft and lies, she knows, if caught, that this will influence a Reader's Interpretation, Conclusion, and Recommendations of the BCHRT Presentation. Dobbs knows she must immediately overwhelm the Reader with material in order to win the day, as she's coming from a Trusted Academic or Scholarly Position with World Standards and most will just believe what is presented as bona fide, and why shouldn't Readers.

My point is, one needs to remember I'm coming from a position that knows the Policy is illegal and her employers have already stonewalled, broke a Crown Settlement Agreement, lied to me, not fulfilled the demands of the Charter, the HR Code, and not even the demands of the Motor Vehicle Act. One needs to remember she represents ignorant, cowardly, and corrupt Politicians and absolutely corrupt Senior Public Servants in their quest to bury their illegal policy and its killing and maiming.

Question, “What does this say about Dobbs?”

Dobbs also knew these facts will influence a Readers' Deconstruction of the Guide, as one knows Dobbs is a thief and liar, abused her Colleagues and Science, broke the Trust of Government and the Public, broke the Trust of the U of A and the Public and its Students, and broke the Trust of a Government employee and the Public, and at this level of corruption she will not change.

My point is, Dobbs knew all this for her BCHRT Presentation, so she presented the BBB, or Bullshit Baffles Brains in an effort to manipulate and falsely justify an illegal Social Policy if she could.



My point is, without knowing who wrote those Drafts and Policy I knew they were just noise, but well presented, as bona fide scientific work, coming from someone with knowledge of Policy or Scientific Papers and what is needed to make the Paper seem bona fide. Yes, at first blush they seemed wonderful and true and I could drop my Discrimination Complaint, as the Government was justifying the Policy, its Intervention, and the Consequences.

Yes, maybe I'll only Review and offer a few comments.

Question, “Hold it, hold it, Format is manipulative, isn't it?”

However, I knew the S G Office was/is corrupt and those in the OSMV are corrupt, as the policy is illegal and only based upon their “view” of life, which means one cannot just Review the Drafts and Policy, as if they were composed to make the world a better place, because they really are contrived to mislead.

My point is, those reading my Responses to the Drafts and Policy will understand that I see their game, their corrupt behaviour and lies concerning their Policy.

My point is, it's the documentation of a bona fide Review or Deconstruction that's important, as maybe they'll come to understand there is no need for the policy; one never knows.

So, by the time I had completed my Deconstructions one comes to understand the Drafts, Policy Paper, and last Draft did not fulfill the Charter, the HR Code, the MVA and/or work through my Five Steps of Engagement or any rules of Scientific Inquiry or the Scientific Method. It was just noise by some unknown, falsely using Scientific and Policy protocol to mislead, misinform, and misrepresent, as to what was being done to diabetics for no bona fide reason.

My point is, one should understand the depth of the BBB concerning the Drafts and Policy. They began with the false inference that the Policy is legal and the writer (s) write as if it is legal and they are just adding to the documentation that justifies the policy, just re – writing an existing Policy Paper, which is a lie.

My point is, this process of misleading, misinformation, and misrepresentation is called bullshit. But, as with lying, there are Degrees; there are Big Ideas present here. These Drafts and Policy were not just Small bullshit but the Grandest category, due to the nature of the illegality being lied about, who's doing it, and what the consequences of the illegality are; Lying which breaches Government and Public Trust, Treason, and Homicide move Small lies to the Grandest of All.

Secondly, there is also Scope here, this is absolutely the Grandest expression of Bullshit, because it is being spread to impact so many people in B C and Canada, deserving the triple Bs, BBB, not the bbb, bBb, BbB, etc, etc, but the Grandest of Lies, the BBBs; the Bullshit Baffles Brains of bullshit.



My point is, we are allowed to say bullshit. Science has bullshiters and bullshit is called when there's false Science, pseudo science, and Science not conforming to the Scientific Inquiry and Method. I'm allowed to say bullshit, as there is a lot of bullshit in Alberta and Dobbs brought it with her. Albertans know what bullshit is and I've heard them use the term in the appropriate circumstance and this is the appropriate circumstance, defining an Albertan, a liar and thief, and disgraced academic researcher.

My point is, Dobbs has nothing legal or real to offer, so she uses Bullshit Baffles Brains in her effort to Persuade, instead of justifying the Policy with bona fide and legal Science.

Reader, there is no material to justify the Diabetic Policy and if there was I wouldn't be here.

Question, “But even if there was how does one justify the consequences?”

One death by government is too much, little lone hundreds, and when we acknowledge Scale, ten years, we move into thousands. This explains her theft of Science and other written 'stuff' on diabetes and the ruse of the breached Trust of Affidavit to bullshit once again about the need for this illegal policy and that the killing is ok.

Secondly, “How does one not acknowledge the DME does not do what its alleged to be able to do?”

Third, “How does one not acknowledge there is no Good coming from the Policy?”

Fourth, “How does one not acknowledge the consequences of the Policy?”

Fifth, “How does one justify 'Not acknowledging' my diabetic care?”

This is done with BBB, done to distract, so the above are not seen. Dobbs cannot acknowledge the above because she is a bullshitter, she cannot tell the Truth, as it really is Horrific. And now she's part of it, as she has been paid to cover it up and that's what's she's engaged in.



With two phoney Drafts and one phoney Policy, which were contrived to Bullshit and manipulate, add the stolen Scientific material to bullshit and manipulate, add falsifying an Affidavit to bullshit and manipulate, add the overindulgence of Dobbs' Curriculum Vitae, and not sending me the Guide as promised, one does not need to worry about how corrupt the “BC 2010 Guide in Determining Fitness to Drive” will be. The BBB will be there.

My point is, by default, we know it will be incomplete and full of lies or Dobbs, S G Bond, Martin, and Howie would have sent me the Guide when it was published in 2010, where in fact they launched their lawyer upon me to force me to stay away.

My point is, by default we can transfer the same lies, BBB, and breach of Trust to her new attack upon Seniors, as Dobbs really has solidified who she is. Don't forget, Dobbs chose to study Seniors full time, completing a PhD in some field concerning Seniors; she studies Seniors and knows their frailties, the stress' and strains, that impact Seniors, and will set these against them, as she wants to study them, add this to her Resume or Curriculum Vitae; she will document the harm.

*

My point is, Dobbs has consciously disregarded what made her, the Rules and Regulations of Scientific Inquiry and the Scientific Method, and moved into the world of BBB, of Bullshit Baffles Brains, instead of bona fide Science, so we need to consider if Dobbs is Schizophrenic and sees herself as the great modern doctor saving society from the disabled, (but she's not a real Medical Doctor, only uses the designation “Dr.” to manipulate and stroke her ego), saving the disabled from themselves, saving the world, as she's placed herself above of the “rule of law” of Canada, as she's certainly proved Canadian law does not apply to her.

Secondly, knowing the policy does kill she has put herself above our Constitution, which states we will rule by the “...supremacy of God...”, meaning only God is allowed to kill. She's put herself above or equivalent to God.

Third, Dobbs has broken with Humanity, as she does not acknowledge Human Rights and is covering up a Crime Against Humanity.

My point is, with one hand she lives one life as an “academic researcher”, bound by World Wide Rules and Regulations, and with the other hand she sees herself above God and Law and does what she wants, believing she's untouchable.

The government labels Dobbs as a “Dr.”, as does her Curriculum Vitae, but she isn't a Medical Doctor, just a researcher by choice; maybe going broke as happens to so many researchers, especially those dependent upon Government grants and contracts, so she's done unbelievable things to gain full – time, permanent employment, a pension, and status for writing a Guide for driving. This makes me wonder if she stole the format for the Drafts and Policy papers I Reviewed, as she's stolen so much already.

Something is very wrong with Dobbs and this needs to be acknowledged, as she's broken, abused, and corrupted the World Standards of Science and Trust that she worked so hard for, or we suppose she worked hard and legally, which gave her the status as “academic researcher”, PhD from the University of Alberta, Edmonton.

My point is, Dobbs received a PhD from the University, not a Doctorate; there is a difference. She uses “Dr.”, in a medical sense, not a psychology sense, and it's just another form of BBB.

Questions; “Is Dobbs Trustworthy enough to work with the Disabled while you're not watching?” and “Is she Trustworthy enough to work with Seniors, while you're not watching?” and “Is she Trustworthy enough that the Public should just accept and implement her Guide and the Senior Policy without severe Deconstruction, as to their validity and bona fide (ness) when she's proven to be the bullshitter of bullshit?”

Answer, “Absolutely not.”



My point is, 'No' one needs to be quiet about Dobbs and who hired her; hired her to steal and falsify documents, mislead, misinform, and misrepresent; all demands of her Oath of Office that are not to be broken, which she has broken. Which means those that hired her have also broken their Oaths of Office, as well as the Trust between Government and the Public.

My point is, if Martin and his thugs kill me, you now have some understanding of who Dobbs really is Now.

*

Corruption and Connections to me, BCHRT, ICBC, and the RCMP

Reader, Dobbs corruption is just part of the recent corruption not attended to by the Solicitor General's Office and the Attorney General's Office, which brings a better understanding of the Scale of the Corruption. As stated above Martin, the SMV, recently attacked and assaulted me and denigrated my character to deliberately harm me, to threaten me, to show me who's boss, as I would again not bow down to him and his twisted perverted behaviour. All done to show me who's Boss, all done to show the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, Human Rights Codes, the Motor Vehicle Act, and his Oath of Office are not the boss, he is. Martin and his supporters play out their lives, believing their anti – social, anti – democratic, psychopathic, and sociopathic behavior is the way to live, no matter who they harm. He should have been fired for this attack and breach of Oath of Office but he wasn't; S G Bond and the A Gs Office protected him again, it's just part of the Gangster life and protection.

Secondly, Dobbs was not fired for her theft and breach of Affidavit and Mail fraud, so you could see Martin wouldn't be fired, but that doesn't mean I can't expose Dobbs, Martin, and S G Bond for their continued criminal behaviour. Corruption begets corruption and these people have gone to far with the charade concerning the Guide and the new Senior Policy.

Third, Questions, “They also threatened the BC Human Rights Tribunal, as how can a Human Rights Tribunal not evaluate a known illegal policy, that is known to harm, that the Medical Examinations are senseless, no Good comes from the Policy, and it is known my General Practitioner and I do take care of myself for diabetes?” and “How can a HR Tribunal not acknowledge theft of protected Science and the breach of Affidavit?” and “What made the BCHRT forget all this and decide I needed to wait for the Guide to see if the Government really is Discriminating?”

The 2009 Decision is just more BBB, by corrupted HRT staff; as the HRT is dependent upon taxes, which begs the question; “Who threatened it?”

Question, “Were staff bullied and threatened?” as I experienced when Martin bullied, threatened, and implemented those those threats, and then falsified documents contrived to harm me?”

Fourth, they also threatened ICBC, as ICBC has not responded to my questions concerning how they treated me concerning Martin's attack and assault and denigration of my character and his falsification of legal documents to do so, in order to have ICBC suspend and then later cancel my license.

Question, “ICBC gives temporary licenses for situations such as mine, where a bona fide argument is presented for a temporary license, and as I wasn't a drunk driver, accident prone, didn't have insurance debt, didn't have any tickets, etc etc; why wouldn't ICBC give me a temporary license?”

This was not explained by the licensing department staff; I was told I could not review what they were looking at on the computer that wouldn't allow the staff to give me a temporary license.

Even after I completed the DME I was not given my license back, but was informed my license had now been cancelled indefinitely and I would need to appear in front of a Board of Evaluation to see what I had done to prove I had changed my 'deviant behaviour' in order to qualify to have a new license. I was told this would take months.

My point is, I wrote the Board and stated I would not kiss Martin's ass, perform fellatio on him, or bend over his desk to have him sodomize me in order to have my license returned; to demonstrated the he is indeed the Boss, the big dog of the pack of gangsters he's running with. I also informed the Board that my 'deviant behaviour' of demanding Martin and his gangster friends fulfill the demands of the Charter Rights, Human Rights, and Rights under the Motor Vehicle Act would not be changed. I received a letter from the Board informing me I would not need to appear.

ICBC has not responded to the fact that the Diabetic Driver's Policy is illegal, that the Driver's Medical Examination cannot do what it's alleged to be able to do, and the Policy is known to harm.

There's been no response to the information Martin has also falsified legal documents to have ICBC use the “Notice of Prohibition” Form as legal tender to suspend and cancel licenses with.

Reader, this interaction with ICBC, the management, took place March 4, 2011; my first letter concerning Martin's illegal change in Classification of diabetes type, from type 2 to type 1, which then saw the OSMV demand I undergo another DME, which was not needed. My second letter concerning the illegal cancellation of license was April 20, 2011.

My point is, Scale, Big Ideas, Connections for Context are played out with ICBC. Now I know the Guide was published in 2010, this means ICBC had known about the 2010 Guide and were basing their actions upon it; they had been given a copy, but I hadn't. My letters informed them I was responsible for the Guide being produced, that I was promised a copy, that I was still waiting for a copy to Deconstruct to understand if the Policy really was needed and a legitimate demand of Government or just more lies. They would also have learned from my letters that the policy has always been illegal and harmed, and that there was and still today is no bona fide and peer reviewed Science to justify the type 2 policy.

All this means that ICBC would need to question Dobbs' Guide, as they knew she had stolen work previously trying to just the policy in a BCHRT Discrimination Complaint. Which means they would also need to discover if Dobbs had stolen and falsified documents concerning all other medical conditions she was presenting against. ICBC chose to be quiet about all this.

Question, “What are they afraid of and who threatened them?”

Lastly, the RCMP know this policy is illegal and that the Government admitted to knowing of the harm, that Dobbs stole research, falsified an Affidavit, and use the mail for her criminal behaviour.

Question, “The RCMP now know the “Notice of Prohibition” Form is illegal and they have not charged Martin and Howie with falsifying documents. Why not?”

Question, “Falsifying documents is forgery isn't it?”
Question, “Falsifying documents to run policy against the Demands and Objectives of the Crown is Treason, isn't it?”

Question, “Misleading and misinforming the RCMP, to have them implement illegal acts against the Public is what?”

My point is, if you talk someone into suicide, the Persuasion is defined as a Class of Homicide.

Questions, “If you talk the RCMP into turning their backs to your illegal behaviour, that is known to kill, this is called what?” and “Talking the RCMP into performing illegal acts, by misleading the RCMP to act illegally, by falsely presenting the “Notice of Prohibition”, as having legal tender, is called what?”

Question, “Again, has the RCMP refused to do anything concerning all this, done to have a Bargaining Instrument to guarantee the signing of a twenty year contract with BC?”

My point is, the contract was only recently signed with the Honourable Solicitor General Bond. It really is a really good bargaining chip, but Blackmail is highly illegal isn't it.

Reader, this is what I've found myself within and the illegal activity and killing continues, while you read and I write, and now you know why you worry about going to Emerge, and doctors can't explain the Overcrowded Emerge, the long wait – times for surgery and MRIs, as the Government has also mislead them about what the influences are that cause the Overcrowding and lack of taxes for surgery.

All done from the perspective of Hate of the Disabled and Diabetic, and twisted games of Lust for Power and Blood.

*

Corruption and the past seven or eight Solicitor General's in as many years

The Harm has been acknowledged by Government and needs to be acknowledged all the time, as it really is hard to believe and understand S G Bond, Martin, Howie, Dobbs and their colleagues know their policy is illegal and kills. The letter that acknowledge this harm came from a joint letter between the Solicitor General's Office and the Ministry of Health. The Senior Public Servant that agreed with me, concerning this illegal policy and its Consequences, (the Harm), and that there was/is no Science to justify the policy, who exposed the Government's knowledge of the Harm, is a General Practitioner. However, she left the Ministry of Health soon after the declarations to me in a formal letter.

Questions, “Was she also threatened my Martin and his colleagues, as I was for telling the truth?” and “Did she understand how corrupt these people are; how they've breached the proven Rules and Standards of Scientific Inquiry, the Scientific Method, and the Trust that's there concerning all this?” and “Did she come to understand they had not fulfilled the demands of the Charter, the HR Code, and the MVA?” and that “These people are indeed killing people, playing out an Atrocity, a Crime Against Humanity, and this was beyond her, so she told the Truth and was threatened, to keep quiet, or else?”

Reader, this is what liars, thieves, bullies, brutes, murders, Nazis, and Traitors do to people that confront them and their “view” of life.

Questions, “What kind of doctor would support such illegal policy?” and “What kind of doctors in the Min of Health support such a Public Policy concerning diabetes, stolen research, falsified Affidavit, the Harm, lack of Good, and that their colleague (s), G Ps, do take care of me every three months?”



The Harm this real Medical Doctor referred to is not a boil on your bottom coming from hours of sitting in an Overcrowded Emerge because you could not visit you G P within a reasonable timeline, as he or she is too busy filling out senseless and useless Medical Forms for Government based upon illegal policy. No, the Harm is the death and maiming you're witnessing in the Overcrowded Emerge caused by Illegal Government Policy and the illegal demands upon G Ps. That's right, that's the Harm that was acknowledged by a real Medical Doctor.

The past seven or eight Solicitor Generals, in as many years, and the present Solicitor General, Bond, and her Senior Staff know this, as does the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles, Steve Martin, and his Deputy Liza Howie, and the other Senior Public Servants that are involved and covering up this Crime of Illegal policy and it's Consequences. Their behaviour really is a Class of Homicide and when Scale is introduced to the number of casualties, it can be defined as a Crime Against Humanity, and as it is Government driven it's defined as Democide.

Previous Solicitor General's have left Office and Government due to allegations of corruption, were moved Politically due to incompetence, or fear of what they were now involved in. No other Ministry is as corrupt as this Ministry. Questions, “What is/are the reason (s) the Solicitor General's Office is the most corrupt Office in our Government?” and “ Is the reason for the continued corruption, after each Politician is fired, runs away, quits, or is transferred, what is left in the Office; corrupt Senior Public Servants?”

Answer, “The corruption just stays in place after the Politician leaves and corrupt the next Politician coming in.”

The Office is Corrupt, as exemplified by the illegal policy and known killing and maiming, the lies, bullying, threats, falsifying of documents, breach of Oaths, hiring of corrupt “academic researcher”, gangster behaviour, and treason.

Question, “Wouldn't this Group – Thinking of Wrong – Thinking twist and pervert new comers?” It certainly has.

Question, “Wouldn't this perverted atmosphere draw corrupt Politicians to the Office, or do the Senior Public Servants twist and corrupt them once there?” Dobbs was corrupt to take the job, as she knew what was needed.

My point is, it's always the Politician that leaves, leaving the monsters like Martin and Howie and all the others that know this policy is illegal, kills, and maims. These monsters are there for the newcomer; to play ball or leave.

So, the Politicians move on, are fired, or retire but the corrupt, perverted, sociopaths, psychopaths, and the Old Thinking, their Group – Think of Wrong – Thinking, entrenched by Senior Public Servants, is still, there ready to psychologically twist, manipulate, and threaten the incoming Politician.

My point is, all past Politicians, Solicitor Generals in this instance, are not corrupt; don't fall into that trap. That's a charade played out by Senior Public Servants in order to redirect and establish blame; they been very successful blaming others for their perverted behaviour, breach of Oath of Office, and illegal policy which is Treason.

Question; “How many other Government Policies have not been legally proved as needed and are hidden by these Senior Public Servants?”

*

The “Five Steps of Engagement” mentioned above

Reader, there are things or processes we do, to be Successful at whatever we do. Science has an Instrument or tool that defines this process, it's the Scientific Method, using seven or eight steps depending on what was discovered, if there is to be an application of an Intervention, and a study of any Intervention before being applied to what ever. My Five Steps of Engagement have been used to evaluate the Government's illegal policy, using the demands of the Charter, HR Code, MVA, and Oaths of Office, which has been proven to be a successful Instrument of Investigation, as look what has happened to me.

Firstly, there needs to be a bona fide Need for the Policy, which has never been proved as needed. There are demands coming from our Charter of Rights and Freedoms, our Human Rights Code, our Motor Vehicle Act, and Politicians and Senior Public Servants' Oaths of Office that Need to be fulfilled before Government sticks its ugly face into the Public's life. Martin, Howie, and their colleagues have not fulfilled any thing but base the Policy solely upon their “view” of life. As explained above, their “view” of life is not worth following nor is it legal, as they have not fulfilled the demands of Canada, so why do they think their “View” of life worth following?

Secondly, the Diabetic Drivers' Policy Medical Examination, DME, the Intervention, cannot do what it's alleged to be able to do; which is to supposedly predict, prevent, and manage hypoglycemia, low blood sugar, the very reason for the Diabetic Policy. So, why do it other that to humiliated the diabetic and turn them into the Social Pariah for Society to fear and despise?

Reader, don't forget, Martin and Howie state that hypoglycemia is the proven reason for the proven difference between type 2 driver mishaps and non – diabetic driver mishaps.

My point is, they've never proved this; it really is unproven; they're lying.

It's not that type 2 drivers do not have driver mishaps or non – diabetic drivers do not have driver mishaps, but that there is a proven difference between the two. Martin and Howie have never stated what this difference is or what the difference should be before Government intervenes with proof of difference.

Questions, “What is the significant difference before Government instigates Intervention?” and “Is the difference one driver mishap every one hundred thousand driver mishaps?” Policy is not made concerning one/one hundred thousand. That difference is so insignificant that it is not done.

Third, the Consequences of the Intervention. The known physical Harm is the Emerge deaths and maiming, and the harm to those waiting for bona fide surgery.

The second Harm is to our Universal Health Care System, UHCS, as wait – times to visit a G P and access to surgery are lengthened, admittance to hospital is changed, as too many admissions come from Emerge and not the G P or Specialist, and Ambulatory Care is dysfunctional as Emerge Facilities are full, as clients cannot visit the G P within a reasonable time, (emerge doctors continuously state 50% of those in Emerge should not be there).

The third Harm is to our “democratic society” in general, as our health care has been diminished, which diminishes our society's health. “Do you really want to go to Emerge?”

The last Harm is Psychological, Emotional, and Social. It's the Harm done to the Diabetic, the Disabled, as Society understands and “views” the Diabetic as the Social Pariah, as something that needs to be Classified, Labeled, Registered, or Given a Number, forced to take a Medical Examination, and will be Tracked for the remainder of their Driving Life.

Fourth, there is no proven Good. That's Right. Martin and Howie have never proved any Good coming from their illegal policy and it's Intervention. There Needs to be Good, and as there is no Good, why is the policy run?

Bad is the opposite of Good. And Bad can be defined as Prejudice, Discrimination, Bias, Bigotry, and Hate, as they know the policy is illegal, and kills and maims the naïve bystander, and they continue on. “But Bad in this context is defined as what?”

Question, “How do they prove Good, if they've never proved something that is 'not Good' on the diabetic drivers' behalf or any disabled drivers' behalf?”

Answer, “It cannot be done.”

Fifth, “We firstly need to ask “What is the client in human experiments or the mouse, rat, pigeon, or chimp in animal experiments, doing with their health?”

My point is, remember this and ask; “Why hasn't the diabetic drivers' health care been acknowledged?”

My point is, again, I manage my diabetic health every three months with doctor care, wouldn't you if you had a chronic disease, a disease that only worsens over time? My care is a bona fide medical examination and process, this is proved as it's paid for by our UHCS. The DME is not, as it's not been proved as needed or offer any Good.

Secondly, my diabetes care is bona fide, Scientifically proven Care, following the Scientific Method for bona fide (ness).

Third, my Personal Care is not only more timely than once every five years, as is the demand from the OSMV, but more Inclusive than the phoney DME I'm forced to comply with. These voluntary, legal, bona fide medical Examinations that I undergo every three months give current knowledge of my disease, where the DME only asks if I've had a Severe Hypoglycemic incident in the past five years.

Question, “That's right; what's the relevance of that information taken every five years?”

That's how Hateful and dysfunctional S G Bond, Martin, Howie, Dobbs, and their colleagues are. Absolute corrupt Humans.

My point is, this bona fide Doctor Care, my Personal Care, is not acknowledged by those that are Discriminating against me and killing the Public due to their Hate, Bigotry, Prejudice, and Lust for Power. Their phoney DME is forced upon me once every five years if I want to drive; this is not inclusive or current knowledge to base anything upon. It's a charade coming from corrupt Senior Public Servants to keep their jobs, to fulfill their lust for power over people, to fulfill their bigoted, prejudicial “view” and ways of life. Their fascination over Life and Death. How else does one explain this?

For S G Bond, Martin, Howie, Dobbs, and their colleagues to not acknowledge this Personal Care only comes from deep seated Hate. Their behaviour is defined as a Hate Crime, as the acknowledgment that I do Practice bona fide Personal Care is denied to me; they denigrate my Character, Dignity, and Self – Respect, as non – diabetics believe I do not care for myself, which is a contrived lie. There is no reason to hide Diabetic Personal Care from the Public, other that Hate.

My point is, all the above can be applied to the attack upon Senior drivers, as nothing has been proved as needed or that the illegal Human Experiment can do anything Good; just the opposite, as the diabetic policy does, it only Harms.

*

Questions concerning the Auditor General

Reader, all the above needs to be set up again for the Auditor General's Office, plus Big Ideas, Scale, Connections, and Context.

This Policy does nothing for our “democratic society”, “human rights”, or those involved in driving, or those needing health care. The absolutely corrupt Senior Public Servants in the Solicitor General's Office and the Office of the Superintendent know this. Solicitor General Bond knows this.

This Policy is run on Bias, Hate, Ignorance, Fear and Loathing, Disgust, Contempt, Discrimination, Bigotry, and Prejudice. It's known to Kill and Maime.

My point is, due to my first BCHRT Discrimination Complaint, Taxes are now used to run and implement this illegal policy.

Questions, “How does government justify the use of taxes for an illegal policy that kills, maims, and offers no Good?” and “Why hasn't the Auditor General returned my request to have this Policy and its Funding examined to prove Government is “implementing” policy successfully?” and “How does the Auditor General explain the killing and maiming of illegal policy or any policy, as bona fide or successful implementation of policy?” (“Successful implementation” of policy is what the Auditor General informed me it examines, not the legality or killing caused by a policy. Isn't that interesting.)

“How is policy, that is illegal, which contrives and constructs the diabetic as the Social Pariah with no Charter Rights, Human Rights, and Rights under the Motor Vehicle Act proven, as 'successful implementation' of social policy in a “democratic society?”

“If this policy is reviewed as successful implementation of Social Policy, where are these liars, thieves, bullies, thugs, brutes, murders, traitors, and Nazis taking British Columbia, therefore Canada?”

Lastly, “Has the Auditor General's Office also been threatened?”

All the above can be applied to the attack upon Senior drivers, as nothing has been proved as needed or that the illegal Human Experiment can do anything Good; just the opposite, as the diabetic policy does, it only Harms.

*

Crimes Against Humanity

Crimes Against Humanity; the hunting and stalking of a Class of People for no good reason. This seems reasonable, as the disabled, in my case the diabetic, as Class of People, have had the Charter Rights, Human Rights, their Motor Vehicle Rights, their Dignity and Self – respect stripped from them; their Rights have been forfeited for no Good or Legal reason. The killing and maiming of the naïve bystander, coming from the illegal Disabled Policies, whom are a very specific Class of People being hunted, qualifies as an Atrocity and Crime Against Humanity, as the naïve bystander is killed from reckless and indifferent behaviour coming from Senior Public Servants whom are attacking those they do not like.

The Senior Public Servants involved have not fulfilled their Oaths of Office, which is an Instrument composed and implemented to keep Government from running amuck; to stay Senior Public Servants from Crimes Against the Public. One is not allowed to kill the naïve bystander or anyone for your personal “view” of life. The indirect killing of the naïve bystanders sets these killings apart from Homicide, these “particular odious offenses” are defined as Democide. (quote from below quote)



The following definition comes from Wikipedia, United Nations protocols based; Crimes Against Humanity;

““Crimes against humanity, as defined by the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court Explanatory Memorandum, “are particular odious offenses in that they constitute a serious attack on human dignity or grave humiliation or a degradation of one or more human beings. They are not isolated or sporadic events, but are part either of a government policy (although the perpetrators need not identify themselves with this policy) or of a wide practice of atrocities tolerated or condoned by a government or a de facto authority. Murder; extermination; torture; rape; political, racial, or religious persecution and other inhumane acts reach the threshold of crimes against humanity only if they are part of a widespread or systematic practice. Isolated inhumane acts of this nature may constitute grave infringements of human rights, or depending on the circumstances, war crimes, but may fall short of falling into the category of crimes under discussion.””



This illegal Disabled policy, run by Premier Clark, S G Bond, Martin, Howie, Dobbs and their colleagues, are not “isolated inhumane acts . . .” (from above quote).

The new Seniors policy, an illegal Human Experiment, run by Premier Clark, S G Bond, Martin, Howie, Dobbs and her husband, fulfills this definition of a Crime Against Humanity. However, the direct killing of Seniors by the new anti – Seniors policy establishes this Crime Against Humanity as Genocide, compared to Democide coming from the illegal diabetic policy and the killing of the naïve bystander in Emerge and those waiting for surgery.



Democide and Crimes Against Humanity really define this illegal disabled policy and that's why the Government and it's Senior Public Servants have lied, mislead, misinformed, misrepresented, stolen documents, hired a corrupt “academic researcher” to corrupt science, threatened people, businesses and agencies, implemented those threats, falsified documents, protected each other, and given each other jobs, as they know they have crossed over any acceptable human interaction with their Group – Think of Wrong – Thinking.

My point is, this Atrocity is why so many Canadians are in denial of this illegal policy and its harm, as this is supposed to only happen in Developing countries, Fascist or Nazi states, or those now defunct Socialist states, and China's Communist state, not modern, developed Democratic states, such as Canada, especially Canada, a modern, developed “democratic society”.



Reader, I never need to be quiet about this Crime Against Humanity and the breach of the demands of our Charter of Rights and Freedoms, of our Human Rights Code, or Motor Vehicle Act, and Oaths of Office, and the total disregard of Human Life by Solicitor General Bond, the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles, Steve Martin, and his Deputy, Liza Howie, Dobbs, and their supporters, and a Premier and RCMP that are pretending it's not happening.

*

Question, “Why do you think Martin, Howie, and Dobbs didn't send me the “BC 2010 Guide in Determining Fitness to Drive”?”

*

Solicitor General Bond

Question, “Solicitor General Bond, what do you think you're doing with this new illegal policy against Senior Drivers?” You were Minister of Advanced Education, worked in the Prince George School District, and other educational boards. If you treated children like this you would be fired and charged with Child Abuse. You'd go to jail and be ostracized within your political community, your social community, and shunned within your religious community.

You “. . . sat on the boards of Carey Theological College, the Personal Living Choices Society, the Trinity Opportunity Funds Grants Committee, and the City of Prince George's Standing Committee on Youth”.

(www. eventcreators.com) You based your decisions on established Morals and Ethics or you would have been fired.

Questions, “Where are these Moral and Ethics now considering the diabetic, disabled, and Seniors?” and “Where are your Morals and Ethics considering your Oath of Office?” and “Where are your Moral and Ethics considering our Charter, Human Rights Code, and Motor Vehicle Act?”

As with Bonnie Dobbs, she espouses the greatness of Morals and Ethics and the Scientific Method to define and sell herself, as the Great Academic Researcher. But when it come to actual money and power she throws the things that made her into the garbage, as you have. She has corrupted the very thing that has made her; the world of Science and the approved, bona fide, World Standard of Scientific Inquiry and the Scientific Method and its Trust. You have corrupted the very things that made you and you have tarnished the term Honourable, used to define your position in Government.

My point is, your office is absolutely corrupt, as how else could this policy run without corruption. And as it has corrupted the past seven or eight Politicians we can apply the same Fall from Grace to you, you have also been lead astray and are not attending to your Moral and Ethical position. You are now choosing to be immoral and unethical and I don't need to be quiet about this.



Martin and Howie's deliberate refusal to send me a copy of the “BC 2010 Guide in Determining Fitness to Drive” again exemplifies how deep their Group – Think of Wrong – Thinking and Social Dysfunction runs. And how that negatively impacts their lives and twists them, and harms the lives of British Columbians relying upon Martin and Howie's Oaths of Office to not kill, harm, lie, steal, misinform, mislead, and misrepresent, and more.

My point is, I can only infer that you have not legally justified the policy, as if you had you would have finally fulfilled your Political obligations to the Public and your Oath of Office, employment demands, and your obligation to the BCHRT Decision to present the Guide as soon as complete.

S G Bond, by not guaranteeing that I received the Guide is a deliberate act of non – compliance, you deliberately broke the Trust between the Government and the Public, and the Public Service and the Public.

My point is, if the Guide was bona fide Martin, Howie, Dobbs, and yourself would have sent it to me immediately and I would not be here, which means we know again, that you're lying and still running an illegal policy that kills and maims. Which means we can apply this charade to the new attack upon Seniors.

Knowing this, it must be asked again, “What are you hiding Honourable Solicitor General Bond?”

*

The “Guide” Again

S G Bond, what the above means, just in case Martin or his supporters kill me, as you didn't fire him, haven't charged him with breach of Oath of Office, Homicide of some Class, and you haven't cancelled the illegal policy, and have supported the illegal Human Experiment upon Seniors, You must be afraid of Martin and the Monsters with him.

My point is, the following is what needs to be demanded of those I'm exposing; work through the Five Steps of Engagement.

I want copies of the Permission Forms Martin, Howie, and Dobbs received from the owners of the Science and other material they'll be using to justify the policy, to prove a Need; those Forms for Copyright use, Intellectual Property Right use, and Intent of Use Forms, just like S G Office and the OSMV use to protect themselves; what's good enough for the Government is good enough for the Public.

These protective instruments are what the owners of Research use to protect themselves from monsters like S G Bond, Martin, Howie, Dobbs and their colleagues from illegal harmful acts, that are trying to be justified with Science, even if the Science states 'do not use', as some of the Science Dobbs stole stated. This Science needs to be compared to the material stolen and presented by Dobbs in her BCHRT Presentation, as the owners again need to be contacted of the use and how Dobbs previously stole their material.

Secondly, I want copies of the studies that prove the Intervention, the Driver's Medical Examination, can do what it's alleged to be able to do. For diabetics, that's decreasing the incidents of driver mishaps caused by hypoglycemia; the so called reason for the diabetic drivers' policy. I have not found bona fide science to support the Intervention can do what its alleged to be able to do.

Questions, “Also, I don't know how Martin, Howie, and Dobbs prove their Intervention changes an unproven difference in driver mishaps and they need to prove this?” and “How does Science prove an Intervention is worthwhile or bona fide, when a problem has not been identified needing an Intervention?”

My point is, No one has proved type 2 diabetics, which are now approximately 97% or more of diabetics, or almost all of the 10% of society that has diabetes, have a greater driver mishap rate than non – type 2 diabetic drivers. That's what this Policy is about; not that diabetic don't have driver mishaps. All this is based upon a “view” that the disabled are having an unproven increase in driver mishaps and yet data from ICBC does not prove this.

Question, “No one has proved this DME, the Intervention, can do anything or has done anything, so why are Martin and Howie doing this?”

My point is, ICBC documents need to be reviewed and presented, as it documents driver mishaps. It's listed the 50 most common driver mishaps and disabled drivers were near the 40th mark, in other words there were 39 other driver mishaps more frequent than disabled drivers.

My point is, all this for this 40th level of driver mishap.

Important: My point is, you must remember, the disabled drivers “listing” includes the 100 different medical conditions that Martin and Howie monitor, so the listing is greater than any other listing to say the least. So, in reality the total or True listing of driver mishaps is 150, not 50, as visually listed on the page.

My point is, if diabetes was listed by itself it would not make the top 50, maybe the top 100, or top 125, or 149.” The cumulate driver mishaps for all these medical conditions is 40th from the top, where others are individually listed, which means the driver mishaps rate for these medical conditions is so Insignificant 100 needed to be combined to be listed at all.

My point is, the Bias concerning how the disabled driver is listed is Unacceptable.

My point is, if type 2 drivers really are such a problem, then the True or Bona fide driver mishap rate should be listed by itself, so the Diabetic and Public can see the Truth.

My point is, The Truth cannot be listed or made Public, as then the Public will come to understand the Lies and Hate from Solicitor General Bond, Martin, Howie, Dobbs, and their supporters.



My point is, there are is another “player” that needs to be investigated within this Intervention, the Second Step of Engagement. Reader, firstly the True or Bona fide lists of the killing and maiming coming from the diabetic driver or disabled driver needs to be compared to the Total killing and maiming coming from the non – diabetic driver and non – disabled driver.

The “other player” not mentioned by Martin and Howie is the killing rate caused in Emerge and those waiting for surgery, caused by the Government's Intervention, that they've written about. These deaths are not driver mishaps but they are a direct consequence of the behaviour of non – diabetics involved in the driving experience. It is part of the Total driver mishap phenomenon, which the Government blames on the diabetic and disabled. These deaths and maiming need to be added to the killing rate of non – diabetic or non – disabled drivers for a complete summary of who's really doing the killing and maiming. This new Total, a bona fide Total, can then be used for comparison between the killing rate of diabetic drivers, disabled drivers, and the non – disabled driver.

And, as the Government always misleads, misinforms, and misrepresents, and lies as to what its doing, a third party needs to Review the Death Records and interview those doctors involved in the deaths in Emerge, both by Emerge Overcrowding and death due to driver mishap and those waiting for surgery.

My point is, “Make sure those Emerge doctors that call NEWS conferences about the Overcrowding deaths are contacted.”

My point is, there's Three, (3), aspects of killing and maiming within this Drivers' Policy with the Government only acknowledged the diabetic and non – diabetic driver mishap killing; but there is their killing and maiming caused by their Intervention; Emerge deaths, those waiting for surgery, and Emerge Overcrowding driver mishap deaths.

My point is; there is killing due to Overcrowding caused by the Intervention. But this is not what I'm referring to in this section. I'm referring to the driver mishap where the ambulance service saves you, or someone saves you, and you're taken to Emerge where you die of a lack of care due to Overcrowding. The death certificate will say 'death by driver mishap' but in reality, you were alive and doing well and should be alive, but the Overcrowding, due to the illegal Government Intervention killed you, not the driver mishap. Interesting how Government forgets about this killing of theirs.

This is important, as the Government knows it is killing through its Intervention and has some how compared the two types of killing, driver mishap “Accident” to Emerge “Constructed” killing, and come to the conclusion their Constructed killing is less or equal to the Accidental killing coming from the diabetic or disabled driver, therefore acceptable.

My point is, Martin and Howie, balance off their killing, a constructed killing compared to accidental killings. And they state their Intervention is needed; only in their “view” of life is it needed. The diabetic or disabled killing needs to be compared to the non – diabetic driver, the non – disabled driver, plus the killing the Government is doing in Emerge and those waiting for surgery. The maiming also needs to be compared. Emerge facilities document deaths, the Overcrowding will be remembered. At only one, (1), death a month, is twelve, (12), per year, times the ten, (10), busiest Emerge facilities, of the 100 hospitals in BC, this becomes 120 deaths a year. At one (1) a week, that's 52 a year, or 520 a year for the ten busiest hospitals. 520 a year times the 10 years I've been inquiring is 5 200 deaths as a result of illegal Government Policy.

My point is, I have not read diabetic drivers are killing this many Humans a year, little lone this number being the difference between diabetic drivers and non – diabetic drivers. S G Bond, Martin, and Howie lie about what is really happening. I have not discovered a Bona fide, Peer Reviewed, paper on actual driver mishaps deaths caused by diabetic or type 2 drivers and then have this compared to straight drivers, or non – diabetic drivers. And yet, deaths are recorded.

Question, “Do you really think Emerge doctors call NEWS conferences for one (1) death a month due to Overcrowding?”

Reader, Interventions are not allow to kill and maime the client or the naïve bystander.

Third, I want copies of the studies done on the Consequences of the Intervention that prove the Consequences have been studied, acknowledged, are acceptable, and offer Good. The Consequences are not just the killing and maiming there's also the cost to the Universal Health Care System, (the demand upon the General Practitioners and Emerge Doctors and the staff), the Public, (the social cost of fear of the disabled and fear of Emerge, as it's now a place of Overcrowding and unexplained death), and the shuffle of taxes to pay for this Intervention, which should be used to pay for bona fide surgery, which would pay for all those surgeries on the wait – lists, with taxes remaining.

The Consequences of this policy are more than they seem and really are horrific.

Question, “How are the Bad Consequences of illegal Government policy acceptable?”

All Interventions have studies done to guarantee no harm to the Subjects, Clients, Society, and the Public before the Intervention is allowed to be applied or offered. It will be interesting to see how many People, the naïve bystander, the Government is saying it's ok to kill and maime, as compared to the difference in killing and maiming diabetic drivers are only supposed to have been involved in.

Fourth, I want a copy of the studies that prove there is Good coming from this illegal policy and its Intervention. How is Good proved when Bad has not been proven?

Fifth, I want a copy of the bona fide Rational, other than their Rationalization or whatever paper Government has contrived, to explain why S G Bond, Martin, Howie, Dobbs, and the other corrupt Senior Public Servants have written to explain why they cannot accept that I, as a diabetic, do practice diabetic health care that is bona fide, legal, follows the Scientific Method, and is paid for the Universal Health Care System, where the Driver's Medical Examination is none of the above.

Reader, there is nothing to justify not acknowledging what I and hundreds of thousands of diabetics and people Classified as disabled do for Personal Health Care.

Without a bona fide explanation the policy is based upon Bigotry, Hate, Discrimination, and Prejudice.

My point is, if these people do acknowledge the voluntary, proactive, personal health care my G P and I practice they will not have any reason to Hate and Discriminate, which will crush their Old Style of Life, their Group – Think of Wrong – Thinking. That's Right, they won't have anyone to Hate in order to drive their lives or allow them to continue with their jobs. They'll need to find some one else to Hate.



Reader, if Martin or his twisted psychopathic and sociopathic colleagues do kill me for exposing their breach of Oath of Office concerning “not sending me the Guide”, these demands are what is demanded of Government, that S G Bond, Martin, Howie, and Dobbs should have fulfilled in order for them to legally justify their illegal policy and the harm they have admitted to.

Don't ever forget, last year Martin attacked and assaulted me, and denigrated my character, falsified legal documents to mislead ICBC in order to have them cancel my license for a indefinite time, using his illegal “Notice of Prohibition” to do so. He used his position in Government to harm me personally, he wasn't just doing Government business. Martin learned S G Bond is afraid of him and his corruption and his corrupt colleagues. So, who knows where these people will go now that I'm exposing their Pettiness, Cowardice, Hate, Bigotry, and Prejudice again.

And their new illegal Un – Sanctioned Human Experiment upon Senior Drivers will bring what kind of attack and assault?

*

*

Bonnie M Dobbs, the Government's Nazi “academic researcher”? Or is it Schizophrenia? or Dementia?

or Borderline Personality Disorder? or some other Mental Health condition?



Bonnie Dobbs, what has she Consciously done or have they been Un – Conscious acts?



Nazi; what a horrific term for a non – Nazi, for a Canadian Democrat, such as myself to use. Nazis are horrific people. The people I'm exposing are not Democrats, but Fascists and some Nazis.

Firstly, Question, “What makes a Nazi?”

Answer, “I don't know.” Mental health issues, fear and loathing of people of difference, fear and loathing of life, fear of the unknown, a 'want' to be different, a 'want' to be bad, a 'want' to confront acceptable socials standards, ignorance, and a 'want' to discredit the complexity and wonder of the Human Spectacle? A want and lust for power, status, and prestige at any cost to those who oppose them.

Values have been twisted and perverted by these people, laws have been broken, Oaths of Office have been broken, laws of Humanity have been broken, therefore any “view” of life by these people has lost any worth or value.

Their total disrespect and disregard for Canada and its Laws, the breach with the “supremacy of God and the rule of law” sets these people apart from Democracy, moving them into Fascism and when their deliberate acts of illegal behaviour causes the known killing and maiming of the naïve bystander, and was not stopped but covered up, these Fascists moved into the world of Nazis; where they believe those being hunted and those killed are acceptable Road Kill or Acceptable Collateral Damage needed to run their “view” of life.

Reader, do not sit on the fence, add to this. Define the people that are doing this to me, therefore you and Canada.



Nazis are like a disease, a virus, a cancer and if not acknowledged and dealt with it kills the host; the host in this instance is the Public, those who invented and play out the Democracy of Canada. Their behaviour is killing and maiming the host, the naïve Public, and they know it.

These people I've exposed, and we don't know who their colleagues are, but who's running Premier Clark and S G Bond, who are now attacking Seniors with an Un – Constitutional, Un - Sanctioned Human Experiment? It really is a Crime Against Humanity and we shouldn't even be talking about this, as something that may happen in Canada, little lone it being here, nor should we be talking about being on the Brink of Genocide.

We're here, in the middle of a Crime Against Humanity and on the Brink of Genocide because the Charter, HR Code, and MVA rules and regulations and laws have been broken by a few and too many are afraid;

“Where Canada is founded upon principles that recognize the supremacy of God and the rule of law: . . .”,



(From the Constitutional Act, 1982, Part 1. Minister of Supply and Services Canada, 1987, ISBN 0-662-55569-4)



My point is, Nazis care nothing for the “supremacy of God and the rule of law” of the existing community that has allowed them to spawn and come forth.



These illegal policies coming from the auto industry and its corrupt Senior Public Servants has only happened through the indifference of too many Canadians; apathy and a malaise seem appropriate.

My point is, the Estates of the Realm are still used today to differentiate our Democracy; the First Estate being the Clergy, who seem to have disappeared in our “democratic society”; the Second being the Nobility or 'Politicians today', who are afraid of what their colleagues are doing, so they pretend this is not happening; the Third being the Middle Class, who seem to be too busy working and playing to keep what they consider middle class wealth, instead of defending the Country that gives them their wealth; the Fourth Estate being the Press, who have entrenched an indifference to this illegal policy and it's horrific consequences, and yet the Press will interview Emerge Doctors about the Overcrowding deaths, but are afraid to open the Emerge doors to explain the 'why' of the Overcrowding; and the Fifth Estate is what's left of the Pubic, not represented by any of the above. They are afraid because Mass Murder and Nazis are too horrific for them.

My point is, this fear allows academic researchers to have their day through the BBB attitude accompanied with a bloated Curriculum Vitae with false prestige and status and arrogance.



Secondly, we can define Nazis by their actions. Let's be very clear hear, I'm the Democrat, I'm the one supporting Canada's Constitution, I'm the one supporting our Human Rights Code, I'm the one supporting Provincial laws such as the Motor Vehicle Act, and I'm the one demanding Politicians and Senior Public Servants fulfill their Oaths of Office of do not Kill, Harm, Lie, Steal, Mislead, Misinform, Misrepresent, etc etc. Nazis do not do the above. Living and Practicing Democracy is against their “view” of life.

As I'm the Democrat, I need to accept that Nazis are allowed in Canada, in our Democracy, as that's how Big Democracy is. I need to acknowledge Nazis have Human Rights. I need to acknowledge Nazis have the same Rights I have under the Motor Vehicle Act. If I don't, you and I do not have a Democracy, we have a Nazis state, not a “democratic society” as our Constitution defines Canada.

All these Rights listed above have been taken away from me and hundreds of thousands of People in British Columbia by these Nazis. And yet, I still give these Rights to Nazis, as that's how Big Canada is.

This does not mean I need to be quiet about Nazis in British Columbia or Canada. Being quiet about them, as the Clergy, Politicians and the Press have been, allows the disease to grow, as it has.

My point is, it allows corrupt academic researchers to steal Science, corrupt it, and present it as the New Science, the Nazi Science.



Third, I'm not running policy against the Demands and Objectives of the Crown. These Nazis are. I am not killing anyone. These Nazis are. I am not consciously continuing on with illegal behaviour and knowing its killing. These Nazis are. Nazis consciously kill those they set apart from Society. They kill the naïve bystander to instill fear and loathing of a specific Class of the Public. These Nazis are doing this and they know it. They especially like to attack the vulnerable, the disabled, a minority is best, such as the disabled driver and Senior Driver. They know they are harming those less fortunate, those that frequent Public Health Facilities, that cannot afford Private Health care, and the blame for the Overcrowding is laid upon those they have selected to be their Pariah, their excuse for running illegal government policy; policy in Opposition to the demands and Objectives of the Crown.

My point is, an academic researcher that consciously steals protected Science or any Science to cover – up the harm or killing of an illegal Social Policy is not a bona fide Scientists or Academic Researcher but a corruption of life itself; the Nazis Science.



Fourth, Nazis' acknowledge the World Standards of Scientific Inquiry and the Scientific Method in their effort to construct bona fide (ness), in order to justify their behaviour, therefore their Social Policy. However, they corrupt the very World Standards of Scientific Inquiry and the Scientific Method after establishing Trust with the Public. One hand doing one thing and when all are watching that hand, the other hand is being very slippery, sleazy, and nasty to say the least by stealing Science and using it for things it was never researched for.



Yes, Dobbs has done all the above, which sets her against Democracy, Human Rights, and the World Wide Scientific Standards that made her. Dobbs, with one hand has established herself as the academic researcher and when all eyes were turned she used the other hand to throw all that has made her into the garbage, done in order to play her charade of justifying the illegal government policy at any cost.

Question, “I wonder how many tax dollars S G Bond, Martin, Howie, and their colleagues paid her and what promises of defense were offered her?”

Oh, and add a pension to this cost, a guaranteed pension, as if she is ever challenged and banished from the Scientific community, she'll need a pension.

*

Dobbs has a BA in psychology, then a PhD in the study of us, Humans, as old Humans, Gerontology, and in doing so gained the Trust of the University of Alberta, Edmonton. Because of what she has done she has breached that Trust as a Scholar, as an “academic researcher”, and employee of that University.

Her Curriculum Vitae lists “Appointments”, (Director of Research, Division of Care of the Elderly, Department of Family Medicine ...” and “Associate Professor, Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine ...”); “Adjunct Positions”, (part time instructor, not a teacher); “Affiliate Positions”, Research Affiliate, Glenrose Rehabilitation Hospital ...”; and “Other”(tutor), as positions she holds with or was given by the University.

All these positions are based upon pre – established Trust and the Trust of the University. Trust that one conforms to the Morals and Ethics of the University. Trust that one conforms to the Morals and Ethics of the University's compliance to the World Standards of Scientific Inquiry and the Scientific Method; the very things that made the University and its Right to give BAs, and PhDs.

Not only has Dobbs broke the World Standards of Science, the Scientific Method, but the Trust from these World Standards of Science and Scientific Inquiry that has made her.

She stole Scientific research that is protected by Copyright, Intellectual Property Rights, and Intent of Use protection devices, which is a crime. This act also broke the Trust to her fellow academic researchers and Scientists.

She broke the Trust to her follow academic researchers and Scientists, as she used their research for things not intended; some articles state do not use for anything and she did.

Doing the above means she also broke Trust between herself, as an “academic researcher”, and the Public.

By doing the above Dobbs broke the Trust between herself, the University instructor and the Students, as she has undoubtedly informed students to do not lie and steal, plagiarize papers, and do not buy online papers or anywhere else. And with the other hand she's doing all this.

Dobbs breached the Trust of Affidavit and its sworn Oath, as she put the stolen material in an Affidavit and Presented it to me, as having bona fide legal use, this was also given her counsel, and to the BC Human Rights Tribunal. Questions, “Again, Why did the BCHRT lawyers refuse to respond to this lie, theft, breach of Trust and breach of Oath of Office after I made all this public?” and “Why didn't the BCHRT lawyers question the private practice lawyer, Nitya Iyer, from Heenan Blaikie, hired by the OSMV to defend them, about this theft, lie, and breaches?”

Answer, “Was it because Iyer was a former BCHRT lawyer and Martin and Howie promised Dobbs protection and it came about through such covert denials such as this?”



Doing all this Dobbs has broken the Oath of Office she swore an Oath to, while becoming an employee with the B C Government. Dobbs has also not fulfilled the demands of the Charter and only feigns she has, which is falsifying documents, which are designed to mislead, misinform, and misrepresent, as to what she is doing for the Government. This involves the “rule of law” of Canada, the Affidavit, which she consciously broke, which contains another Oath, an Oath to Canada's “rule of law”, which she broke on purpose, which means she's running her own rule of law, deceiving everyone to believe she is complying with the Oath of Affidavit, which means Dobbs is a Traitor, as she's falsifying legal documents for her own gain, and using them against the Demands and Objectives of Canada's “rule of law”. She has also broken the Trust between the Government and the Public. She has also broken the Trust between the herself and University of Alberta, and the Public and the University, as she's a staff member and uses their prestige and status within the Community and Scientific Community do deceive that all is Right in what she is doing.

My point is, these aren't little lies, lies of convenience, these are the biggest lies that are done to manipulate and harm. For doing this, it proves she's a thief, chronic liar, and absolutely untrustworthy. Are you really going to let her work with your parents, especially when no one is watching? How does she justify her behaviour to students? Dobbs has broken the Trust with students. With one hand Dobbs tells her students something like this, “Do not plagiarize, do not buy papers online, and do not have papers written for you. If you are caught you will be expelled from the University for doing so.” This reminder is standard practice in High Schools, Colleges, and Universities. And with her other had she's stealing and lying and falsifying an Affidavit.

Question, “Do you want Dobbs to instruct your kids?”

Question, “As your kids are teens, therefore Children still, at least for the first years of University, doesn't this mean Dobbs has, is, involved in Child Abuse?”

Question, “As Dobbs has done this to teens, will you believe what she writes about your health or your parents health?”

*

University of Alberta needs to strip Dobbs of all her positions

The University of Alberta, Edmonton, needs to strip Dobbs of all her positions due to theft, lies, mail fraud, breach of her Oath of Office, as an employee of the British Columbia Government, (which is a breach of Trust using the status and prestige of the U of Alberta, Edmonton), and breach of Trust with the University, little lone its Moral and Ethical Rules and Regulations of Conduct, (and its Rules and Regulations attached to its Degree giving), breach of Trust to the students, breach of Trust to the parents who send their children to University, as the University's staff member is a liar and thief, and breach of Trust to all the academic researchers and scientists she stole research from.

The University of Alberta should also strip Dobbs of her PhD for abusing their Standards of Scholarship, the thing that made her, as she turned her back upon that Trust and Scholarship and yet used their position to guarantee bona fide (ness) of her behaviour and presentation. Dobbs used their Good name to deceive and manipulate.

My point is, this is Professional Misconduct to say the least.

My point is, Bona fide and Good Science and bona fide academic researches do not need to do the above. Their work will be good enough. This is why Dobbs has not sent me the Guide. It's unprofessional and phoney and does not fulfill the demands of the Charter, the HR Code, the MVA, and fulfill the demands of Bona fide Science or Dobbs would have sent me the Guide with absolute deserved Pride and Honour in her seminal work.

My point is, this is Professional Misconduct to say the least, as Dobbs has used the University's status and prestige, taken the money for the work and not delivered to the very person that forced Government to hire her in an effort to justify their behaviour and demands upon the Public. Dobbs has taken Public funds and not delivered the work to the person that has been given the Right to Deconstruct her work, for bona fide (ness), value, and worth; she has hidden it.

Question, “Do I have the Right to complain to the University of Alberta, Edmonton, where Dobbs is an employee, as I don't have children there and I've never attended the University?”

Answer, “Absolutely. Firstly, my Federal Taxes are used to support the University. Secondly, what Dobbs has done, lying to students as to her behaviour of theft, lying, and falsifying an Affidavit, is Child Abuse, as students are in their teen years. Child Abuse has no boundaries. Third, it is a Breach of Trust, as students are absolutely guaranteed that they will not be abused by Academics and Scholars while learning in the University environment. Breaches of Trust have no boundaries. Fourth, one does not need to be an Albertan, or a Student or Academic to Review and Deconstruct a University employee's Public Presentations. Dobbs uses the University as a Witness and Guarantor, or Supporter of her Presentations, and they should know what she has done behind their backs; especially when they're Position is used to cover – up a Crime Against Humanity and Democide.

Fifth, a University should welcome all comments and reviews of any employee's presentations, as they know constructive criticism does make the world better. A University also knows that challenging deviant and illegal behaviour of staff is a must, as it makes the University a better place for all concerned.

My point is, Dobbs needs to be publicly investigated for how she has abused the University of Alberta, Edmonton, so that Students, Parents, and Financial Supporters know it will not tolerate such behavior from staff; especially from those in a position to abuse students and the disabled.

*

Dobbs' BCHRT Presentation concerning my Discrimination Complaint was just a form of the Triple Bs, BBBs, which was not really expected coming from someone managed by some very restrictive protocols; Science Protocols, Oaths of Office, laws of Humanity, and the laws of Canada and BC, Trusts from an affiliation with the University of Alberta, Edmonton. But, that's what Dobbs' plan was, to deceive by affiliation to the standards of the University and World Science. Done from someone with a BA in psychology; so she uses her degree to manipulate, as that's what psychology is, the study of our behaviour.

She also has a PhD in gerontology, the study of us in our senior years, but the study is still of our behaviour. Dobbs absolutely knows how to write manipulate presentations if needed, which she found a need for.

Secondly, Dobbs absolutely knows how to manipulate the Senior if needed. And that's what she's done with her affiliation with her husband's illegal, Un – Sanctioned, Human Experiment upon Senior Drivers.

Question, “Shouldn't what Dobbs has done should be a flag to ask, “Why has she done this?””

Question, “What kind of mental health does Dobbs now have, to have done all this?”

Question, “Are we to believe Dobbs doesn't know what she's done?

Questions, “Are we to say Dobbs has Dementia, Schizophrenia, or Borderline Personality Disorder, as these three terms are what seems to be bandied about when someone's personality and/or behaviour changes?” and “Or, will this be her defense?”

My point is, people with mental disorders do play games to protect themselves.

Question, “Why not Dobbs, as she studies Dementia?”



So, Dobbs, with one had uses her BA and PhD to placate the reader and with the other hand steals, lies, breaches Oaths of Office, Trusts, and the laws of BC and Canada, and the laws of Humanity.

My point is, isn't this just a wonderful person to have instruct the next generation of Academics and Researchers.

Questions, “I wonder if any of the 'other entities' she represents, mentioned in her Curriculum Vitae, would condone theft, lies, breach of Affidavit, Oaths, and Trust?” and “Do they know she's done this?” and “Do they really want her as their spokeswoman?”

My point is, we need to ask what she's stolen and lied about considering the 'other entities' that Dobbs lists in her Curriculum Vitae, to give her status and prestige; done to manipulate the reader that all is bona fide research.

My point is, I don't need a liar and thief working for me and I don't know who would, expect the corrupt Politicians and Senior Public Servants in the Solicitor General's Office and those Senior Public Servants in the OSMV. Government does not need liars and thieves working for it, and I think for the most part the B C Government does not hire these twisted perverted people and the best example of this is Dobbs herself.

My point is, don't forget, no one in B C took this job, S G Bond, Martin, and Howie needed to go outside of B C to find someone to steal, lie, and falsify an Affidavit, all done to hide their criminal behaviour and the killing and maiming.

*

The “Sections” of Dobbs' BCHRT Presentation

Reader, bear with me, as I'm not including Dobbs BCHRT Presentation and there are important points being made.

First, lets call this section the Opening, as Dobbs' opening salvo presented a statement of “Affidavit” and “Oath” to begin with, guaranteeing fulfillment of Scientific and Legal Standards, Trust, and Scholarship. She then presents a Review of what she says she did to justify the policy, using language of science, a genre for those in the know, that is used to impress upon the reader her level understanding of Science, it's complexity, therefore her absolute adherence to Scientific Rules of Inquiry and Scientific Method and to the Rules of Scholarship; 5 pages worth.

Second, then her Curriculum Vitae, listing her research grants and the renumeration, papers presented, posters presented, Contracts and renumeration, Invited Presentations, Refereed Presentations, Publications, Book Chapters, Journal Articles, Published Abstracts, Educational Print Material, Educational Videos, Technical Reports, Media Interviews, Workshops, Student Supervision, Teaching Experience, (Dobbs knows she's not a Teacher and uses this Professional Standing to manipulate, she should be reported to the Alberta Teachers Association for using their Title when Dobbs know she's not a Teacher, but an instructor or giving “guest lecture” work or opinions. She uses this Official Title of “Teaching Experience” to manipulated, just as she knows she's not a real medical doctor, but labels herself as Dr., where her real Title is PhD), and Scholarships since she was in High School; 32 pp of self indulgence and bragging.

(It needs to be noted that Dobbs has not studied or published on diabetes, type 1 or type 2, on diabetic driving, or hypoglycemia, or about the Intervention and its Harm or if the policy offers any Good; the very subject of the policy and her Presentation. Dobbs forgets to mention this.)

Third, one page of box diagrams, of how Dobbs will contrive what's needed to justify the disabled policies.

Lastly, 16 pages of References, or two hundred articles concerning diabetes and driving; or that's what you're supposed to believe. They're supposed to be about diabetes and driving, hypoglycemia, and how the Intervention is bona fide and offers Good, as that's what the policy is about.

However, what she's listed does not match with what she has presented in her Opening Review, as to what she has done to legally justify the Policy and its Intervention. The References certainly do not match the language she uses in her Opening concerning those resources she says she researched online to justify the diabetic policy with. There are huge discrepancies between the two, as after reading the Opening one expects all Peer Reviewed Research, as Dobbs has taken on the task of fulfilling the demands of our Charter, Section 1, the BC Human Rights Code, Section 8, and the demands of the Motor Vehicle Act, Sections 25 and 29, and Oaths of Office.

My point is, after researching “diabetes” and “diabetes and driving” myself and then making the Inquiries I made to the Office of the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles and Howie, knowing there is very little bona fide research done concerning type 2, as it's been proved to not be needed, I was absolutely astounded with the amount of References Dobbs presented. Dobbs was not only saying she has proved a bona fide Need for the policy, but that the Intervention can do what it's alleged to be able to do, that the Consequences of the Intervention do not Harm and if there is Harm the Harm is acceptable, that there is Good, and lastly that the diabetic Does Practice bona fide diabetic health care and what the Consequences of those actions are. Dobbs' presentation of References does nothing to fulfill these demands.

My point is, some of the references may be peer reviewed papers, but what of?

My point is, there's an enormous amount of “Stuff” within these two hundred References that are not related to Diabetes, hypoglycemia, diabetes and driving, the Intervention, or anything concerning justifying an illegal Social Policy and its Harm.

My point is, Dobbs References are an excellent presentation of the BBB, Bullshit Baffles Brains, attitude of a corrupt “academic researcher”.

*

“Stuff” defined

“Stuff” is defined as; I don't know who wrote it, when it was written, what it's really about, where it came from, or what's its Connection and Relevance is to Diabetes, Diabetes and Driving, the Intervention, and Good.

Stuff is also Padding, padding to make things seem bigger and better than they are, stuff not related to Diabetes and Driving, and the Intervention and Good. It may be Science but not something bona fide with Peer Reviews, and all this is just stuffed in the References Section.

The only Connections to the subject at hand is something superficial, something very weak, something that may only be the words 'diabetic', or 'type 2', or 'hypoglycemia', with no Relevance to diabetes and driving, the Intervention, or Good.

Question, “And when this is understood, what is left to support the pedestal Dobbs has contrived and placed herself upon, as the expert in diabetes and diabetic driving, the Intervention, and Good?”

My point is, it's just stuff to pad a document, to make is seem more full than it really is. Yes, it really is called Padding and it's just another example of BBB from someone that is not competent to do her job and cannot legally justify the work she has taken on. So, Dobbs guaranteed S G Bond, Martin, and Howie she would Bamboozle the Public with BBB, as with her inflated Curriculum Vitae, really just a Resume, would distract from reality, and if challenged, by me or someone else, she would feign ignorance or whatever. And this is what she did.

My point is, it was stated Dobbs stated she was presenting for type 1 and type 2, and had misunderstood the Scope of my Discrimination Complaint; the very thing that gave her the job. This silliness supposedly explained the amount of material presented. Imagine that, a person with a BA, a PhD, and extraordinary “academic researcher”, and University of Alberta staff member not remembering what she was hired to defend in a BCHRT Discrimination Complaint.

Question, in response I asked; “How does Dobbs explain the theft of the type 2 research, breach of Oath of Affidavit, and mail fraud?”

My point is, this was not explained.

My point is, Dobbs Presentation was withdrawn and that is why she was kept on to write the Guide.

My point is, if I had not challenged this lying, thieving, corrupt “academic researcher”, from the University of Alberta, Edmonton, the diabetic policy would have justified through her stolen research.

If Dobbs presented such a charade for her PhD she would have been laughed at, failed, and dismissed from the University. She would have been dismissed as a Thief, as she stole research, which also means she broke the law concerning Copyright, Intellectual Property Rights, and Intent of Use laws. Dismissed for breaking the Trust of the Scientific Community and the University, as they should not need to watch their backs all the time for compliance to the established Codes of Ethics and laws that are there to follow. Dismissed as a Liar for falsifying an Affidavit, which guaranteed the use of the research, which Dobbs didn't have.

Dobbs did not dare “Pad” for her PhD, as she knew her Peers would have Deconstructed her PhD presentation and she would not have got away with it. But she did it when they weren't watching and abused them, their Trust, and the University of Alberta's Prestige, Status, and Good within Society and the Global Education Environment. She abused the Public by falsely using her credentials to mislead, misinform, and misrepresent, as to what she was doing. She used padding to bamboozle the naïve bystander; those outside the world of Academia and Scholarship.

My point is, this is the very behaviour that constructs and solidifies walls between the world of Academia and the Public.

My point is, Dobbs' padding has broken the Social Contract of Trust between the University and Scholarship and the Public, as Dobbs states she represents the University of Alberta and is an instructor there, which means the University supports Dobbs lies and theft. They don't really.

Again, as an instructor and tutor Dobbs instructs her students to 'do not steal' or 'buy their papers', and 'do not lie', and yet on the other hand she waits until their backs are turned and steals and lies herself. She has broken the Social Contract of Trust between Government, (as she's also a government employee doing this), and the Public; between the University and the Government, (this because universities and government are deeply involved), and the Public; and lastly the University and the Public (how am I to Trust the research coming from the U of A after one of their staff is a known liar and thief? How are parents and students to Trust the University when Dobbs is one of their staff?)

All “Stuff” to mislead and pad about who she really is and what's she's doing.

Question, “And you don't think Dobbs has Mental Health issues?”

*

It's interesting how Dobbs created this difference, that she didn't match her References with what she wrote she did in her Opening.

Questions, “Dobbs didn't prove a Need for the diabetic policy, little lone address the Harm. Why?” and “She failed to inform readers I visit the General Practitioner for diabetic care every three months. Why?”

Question, “Dobbs would have needed to do this for her PhD or any bona fide study. Why not for the diabetic?”

My point is, as I talk about Scale, scale also needs to be brought into Dobbs References, there should have been at least nine thousands, 9 000, pages of Permission Forms and there was nothing, and she knows this. 200 research articles x 3 protection instruments each = 600 instruments x approximately 15 pages each = approximately 9 000 pages.

Question, as Dobbs forgot the Scope of my Discrimination Complaint are we to believe she forgot 9 000 pages of Permission Forms?

*

Dobbs' Opening presents an impressive amount of Scientific material she has read or states she has read, which is supposed to have readers believe her bona fide (ness) concerning her BCHRT Presentation; but what did she really do with it? She never made connections to the “Stuff” she presented in her References. She just presented more “Stuff” to bamboozle the reader with BBB, as they are expecting such a Procedural Listing and within such a Format.

My point is, if this material really did support the Policy, I would have found it before my initial inquiry and not been here. If it was offered in 2002 – 2004 when I began my inquiry I would not be here, or if it was online I would have found it and I would not be here. If this material was there in 2004 – 2006, I would not have lodged my first BCHRT Discrimination Complaint.

My point is, this must be remembered about what Dobbs is saying she reviewed and read, which proves a Need for the Policy, the Intervention is able to do what it's alleged to be able to do, the Consequences are acceptable, and there is Good.

However, there's only four or five bona fide articles on type 2 driving and hypoglycemia, and they support my proclamation that there is no difference in driver mishaps between type 2 and non – diabetic drivers; therefore no need for this policy that has not been proved to be able to do anything, but harm.

My point is, Dobbs' Opening really is just more Padding; very official and scholarly looking Padding.

*

Her Curriculum Vitae goes on and on, adnauseam, where she lists having someone presenting a poster for her, so what; she lists places where she was asked to speak, so what; she lists things she did when a teenager, so what.

My point is, these niceties do not legally justify an illegal Social Policy that is known to kill and maime. Public speaking does not justify Social Policy or prove Dobbs has done the bona fide, peer reviewed research to justify Social Policy in a working democracy, such as Canada, where the demands of the Charter, HR Code and MVA must be fulfilled before Implementation of a policy. And where are Dobbs' studies that prove the Harm acceptable?



My favorites Curriculum Vitae listing is where she's been contracted to do reviews;

“(2006). Driver fitness literature review and update of the medical conditions and driving: A review of the scientific literature (2000). British Columbia Office of the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles ($84, 223.80).”

Dobbs states she does this again in 2008 for $20,000.



My point is, the above quote is interesting as the material Dobbs is reviewing, which includes diabetes, was sparse to say the least. At this time, 2000, the OSMV did not have a Policy Paper, or today it's called the Guide, on any medical condition monitored, so what was Dobbs reviewing and updating? Not bona fide research the government had legally obtained to justify their policy and its harm.

That's right, these Senior Public Servants were breaking the law then and they knew it. They were basing the Policy on their “view” of life, not the Charter, HR Code, and the Motor Vehicle Act.

My point is, I was diagnosed with type 2 in 1999 and was working libraries and the internet for research to justify the policy and its consequences, as the Canadian Diabetes Association had no material.

Type 2 diabetes was a relatively new term used to acknowledge the differences in diabetes, the term really came into use during the 1990s. The research that I read, that debunked the “view” of people like Howie and her anti – diabetic supporters, that the type 2 driver is a danger to society, this seminal research was published during 2000 – 2002. These experiments were run by the most prolific diabetes – driving researchers in the world, the most prestigious diabetic – driver researchers in the world, and their articles were Peer reviewed, and no one has challenged them or found fault with their discoveries.

My point is, Bona fide, Peer Reviewed type 2 diabetic driving research is very rare, as it has been proven there is no difference in driver mishaps between type 2 drivers and non – diabetic drivers. Therefore, Scientific and Financial realities come into play;

Question, “How would researchers continue to glean and spend funds on an redundant topic?”

My point is, what this means is that Dobbs read the same research I had read in 2000 – 2004, in 2006, the year of my first Discrimination complaint and its withdrawal due to Government Promises, then again in 2008, my third complaint, where she then presented the stolen research.

My 2002 – 2004 Inquiry into the diabetic drivers' policy and the listing of research to support my Inquiry and then again in my Discrimination Complaint, probably directed her to the research that she's listed in her References, as she knows nothing about and has not studied diabetes. I saved her a lot of work, as she knew what and how to 'discover' these type 2 research articles. She used me again with the Draft, Policy, and Draft mentioned above.

My point is, No, Dobbs is not some naïve bystander in all this corruption and killing and theft of research. She's a player and abusing the University of Alberta, its Students, Science, the Public, and the Democracy of Canada. Dobbs absolutely knows how to “Pad”, to “stuff”, and how to manipulate with her status and prestige of an “academic researcher” and through the affiliation with the University of Alberta.

My point is, Dobbs is a parasite of my work. It's plagiarism in a sense.

*

Questions, “When you read the things Dobbs has done, her Curriculum Vitae, what has she really done?” and “What work of hers has been good enough to make bona fide Social Policy in our “democratic society”?”

She offers reviews of reviews, but who and who with, and was she the principal researcher or only part of the research or presentation. What was Peer Reviewed for authenticity and bona fide (ness) and did anyone in the World use her work to better the World? Dobbs should have informed readers of the Peer Reviewed research she has done and what research has proven and saw the implementation of bona fide Social Policy, as that is what she is trying to do here. She is trying to establish herself as someone that's work is Good enough for Social Policy and yet she steals research, lies, and falsifies an Affidavit to do so.

My point is, Dobbs does not prove her work is good enough for Public Policy.

My point is, Dobbs is doing what her husband is doing with his Cognitive Human Experiment, she's trying to prove a Need for a Public policy through BBB, not bona fide peer reviewed research. Her husband is running his illegal Mind and Brain Experiments in the hope of proving his computer toy is bona fide, and punishing the clients in doing so, and if they do not meet his unproven expectations of where a seniors mind should be, he recommends cancellation of license. All based upon padding and a corrupt process of thinking himself. Dobbs and her husband have the Cognitive impairments, not the Senior drivers.

Question, Dobbs lists her 'journal articles' for power and prestige; there's a one page article, two pages, one page, three pages, etc. “Bona fide Social Policy is supported with a one page study?”

Answer, “It isn't.”
Question, “There's one article with eight pages, with three other authors, where she is not the primary researcher, which means what?”

Answer, “It means she may be working with others that are forced to research to keep their university or research positions and she's been added for some reason, maybe for the fact she knows how to organize and present a paper and they in turn will help Dobbs when and if needed.”

It's a sad thing to state but this goes on in the world of research and universities; staff forced to Publish, so the above takes place. Nothing indicates the articles have been Peer Reviewed.

Question, “Dobbs has trained herself to write and she does, but what 'works', or 'writings', or 'articles' of Dobbs and the other authors really have bona fide status and application to the matter at hand?”

Answer, “Dobbs used the two hundred References for one thing only, as BBB. The charade is to list so many articles that on the surface readers Just Believe, as there really is an established Trust with Science, Universities, and researchers.

Secondly, people don't have time to read this much Scientific material and Dobbs knows this; so readers read where it's coming from and Just Believe, as there really is an established Trust. BBB is the charade played out here by Dobbs. It's unethical and immoral and she breached the Trust of Academia or Scholarship.

Third, the presentation of the Oath, Affidavit, Opening Review, Curriculum Vitae, and the References makes Dobbs' BCHRT Presentation seem a very powerful instrument, constructing or composing a Trust and bona fide (ness) through Scholarship and Science and all its Rules and Regulations for the Reader to just accept what has been presented as Bona Fide and Trustworthy. Something that's more than just acceptable, but Right. But in reality it's about how Wrong it is.

My point is, Dobbs' Presentation is not something composed, its contrived to manipulate and deceive. The contrived status, prestige, and power is just that, it's contrived. It's absolutely Wrong.

*

Reader, Science must be Deconstructed, as it makes it better. Curriculum Vitae must be Deconstructed to see what the author really has done and it's importance to the matter at hand. When Dobbs' Curriculum Vitae is Deconstructed the reader understands Dobbs has not studied Diabetes, which is now ten percent of the population, rising five percent since I began this Inquiry in 2002, nor has she studied hypoglycemia, or diabetes and driving, or studied the Intervention for Good or Harm, or written about how Government or an “academic researcher” can prove the killing and maiming coming from the policy she supports and wants to implement is acceptable.

Dobbs has no expertise or legitimate status, prestige, and power concerning the matter at hand. Dobbs' focus concerns Gerontology, and now we know she has stolen Science and falsified an Affidavit we need to transfer this deviant behaviour to all her work.

When the Scale of Gerontology and driving is examined senior drivers are only a small percentage of the population compared to the other ninety – nine medical conditions the OSMV states it monitors. Dobbs' real influence is only minuscule when the Scope of the Disabled Drivers' Policy is acknowledged, which is further diminishes as Dobbs studies only a very specific category of Seniors. So, she contrives status, prestige, and power, then steals and lies to make herself bigger than she is; Dobbs has Padded herself.

Question, “When her 'articles' or 'work' is Deconstructed what will she truly offer to the world, diabetics, the disabled, seniors, and the world of driving?”



When one Deconstructs Dobbs' Opening Review we are supposed to believe she has studied and reviewed all one hundred medical conditions the OSMV monitors, for peer reviewed articles and bona fide (ness), to make sure a paper or an article of one page, of two pages, or three pages is more than just noise or someone publishing to keep their job. We're supposed to believe Dobbs read and evaluated thousands of articles that can be used to legally justify a Social Policy and its Interventions, not just whether or not Dobbs, as an “academic researcher” studying Seniors, should feed Disabled Seniors bananas or yogurt in the morning.

My point is, what's needed is more than Dobbs' 'style' or 'kind' of research; arbitrarily listing medical conditions.

Questions, “Has Dobbs really evaluated the papers and articles to make sure the authors have complied with the Rules and Regulations of Scientific Inquiry, the Scientific Method, and Codes of Ethics?” and “Has the research been Peer Reviewed for bona fide (ness), where they are then allowed to make a Recommendation for Intervention?” and “Where then the Intervention will be studied for Harm, under a Governing Body and Code of Ethics?” and “Has the Intervention been tested upon non – humans, then a small cohort of Humans?” or “Have these researchers done what her husband is doing, running an Un – Sanctioned Human Brain and Mind Experiment, not managed by a Governing Body and Code of Ethics, and trying to prove an Intervention is bona fide through illegal and inhuman behaviour?” and “Are these researchers doing what Dobbs has done, stolen research and lied?”

My point is, we know Dobbs has not done the above Standards for diabetes, so why should anyone believe she has done the above for the other one hundred medical conditions, she states she's reviewing for bona fide Policy?”

All this must be done to prove bona fide (ness) for such things as Social Policy within a “democratic society”.

My point is, Dobbs has done all this to circumnavigate all the above Scientific Rules and Regulations, Codes of Ethics, Laws, and demands of the Charter, the HR Code, the MVA, and Oaths of Office.

*

Scale of Permission Forms

Reader, lets look at Scale. Dobbs presented two hundred, 200, articles concerning diabetes, the fact that most had nothing to do with diabetes, hypoglycemia, diabetes and driving, or an Intervention, doesn't matter.

My point is, what matters is the Precedent, the Standard Dobbs set with this many articles. This means the other ninety – nine , 99, medical conditions now monitored by the OSMV should have the same number of articles reviewed, as Dobbs set the Standard with the diabetes policy, and as the diabetic policy is the matter at hand that instigated the Guide, all else follows what was done for the Discrimination Complaint that instigated Government legalize their policy and harm. And, as this is Social Policy governed by the demands of the Charter, the HR Code, and the Motor Vehicle Act, and Codes of Ethics the Standard set by Dobbs needs to be carried through to each medical condition.

Question, “Do you really believe Dobbs has done this?”

As Dobbs is so prolific with her diabetes research we can assume she has applied the same Scholarly Standard to the other ninety – nine medical conditions. We then have 200 articles for each medical condition x 100 medical conditions, which allows the Public and me to expect Dobbs to have reviewed at least 20 000 articles for her Guide that she's contracted to write. So, we have 200 articles x 100 medical conditions = 20 000 articles.

Questions, “Do you really believe Dobbs has reviewed this many articles for the above and that the articles do fulfill the demands of the Charter, the HR Code, and the Motor Vehicle Act?” and “Don't forget, this is only for the articles Dobbs listed, where she would have read how many more to discover what one's she wanted to list?” and “Do you really believe she's done this?” and “Has she read ten articles to find one, that she can list that proves her point that Policy is needed?”



There should have been approximately 9 000 pages of Permission Forms, more or less, for the diabetic research Dobbs presented; for the Protection Instruments called Copyright, Intellectual Property Rights, and Intent of Use Permission Forms. Lets say on average each Protection Instrument has 15 pages. 200 articles about type 2 x 15 pages of Permission Forms on average, which sees 200 articles x 45 pages of Permission Forms = 9 000 pages for type 2diabetes.

My point is, if Dobbs has stayed on task for the Guide she should have presented 9 000 pages for type 2 diabetes x 100 medical conditions = 900 000 pages of Permission Forms. Additionally there will be 9 000 pages of Permission Forms for type 1 diabetes. Do you really believe Dobbs has or will do this?



My point is, There isn't 200 articles on 'type 2 diabetes and driving' and 'hypoglycemia', little lone any study proving “the Intervention” is acceptable, or can do what it's alleged to be able to do.

The articles I read and listed as proving my claim of Discrimination were Peer Reviewed and debunked the “view” that type 2s are problematic. That's why there's so little research on type 2 driving, as the bias, bigotry, and prejudice have been debunked by bona fide research and bona fide “academic researchers” and Scientists.

Secondly, I have not discovered an article that supports the Intervention, which the B C Government mistakenly acknowledged as harmful.

Question, “Why hasn't Dobbs acknowledged this in her presentations?”

My point is, with medicine some drugs have disclaimers about some consequences of the drug not being Good.

Question, “Why hasn't the B C Government initiated studies about the killing and maiming going on in Emerge and to those waiting for surgery, the consequences of the diabetic policy?”

Question, “If S G Bond, Martin, Howie, and their colleagues are so Righteous about the Policy, why haven't they studied the Consequences to prove they are acceptable?”

Question, “If the thief and liar Dobbs is so Great why haven't they hired her to investigate the killing and maiming?”

*

Insurance Scale

Question, “Even if those researchers did find something that proved there is a difference in driver mishaps between type 2s and non – type 2s, what is the actual driver mishap?”

The Public is never told. Government and the anti – diabetic lobby present the driver mishap as always death and destruction; but research is not allowed to kill and maime, so this is not proved. Death facts come from the Emerge and Insurance company records.

Question, “Where does the accusation of excessive killing, coming from Government and the anti – diabetic lobby, come from?”

Answer, “They make it up. They do this to contrive fear and loathing of the diabetic, so their “view” of life is not Deconstructed for what it is.

My point is, just as I Deconstructed Dobbs presentations and exposed them for what they are, the real the Insurance Claims also debunk this “view” of the disabled and diabetic driver as problematic. As noted above, disabled driver mishaps are listed together, all 100 together, where no other driver mishap class is.

Question, “Do diabetic drivers have more fender benders in malls, run over more garbage cans, and all the other driver mishaps listed by insurance companies?”

Answer, “ICBC's online data does not prove this.”

Again, ICBC lists the top fifty, 50, Driver Mishaps.

My point is, again, the 'driver mishap' rate for disabled drivers is so Insignificant that All “Disabled Driver Mishaps” are listed together. Not one other Class of driver mishap is listed this way. Which means, you, the Public, understand the type 2 driver as being within a Classification that is not true. If the Disabled driver Mishap is listed as 40 you see me at that rate. But, in reality that Classification contains 100 medical conditions.

My point is, if listed individually, the 100 medical conditions that Classify the client as disabled, the “disabled driver mishaps”, would not make the top fifty listed driver mishaps.

Question, “How would you perceive the type 2 driver mishap if they were 150 of the 150 listed driver mishaps?”

Question, “How would you perceive a type 2 driver, if at 150, and 151 is a driver that has Never had a driver mishap?”

Question, “Why are the disabled drivers listed together?”

Question, “As the disabled are being selected for Special Treatment why isn't each disability listed individually so the Pubic can see what the real driver mishap rate is?”

My point is, this Special Treatment sets the disabled driver up for attacks through fear and loathing, as the truth is not told about the disabled. This Special Treatment is Discriminatory, as there is no bona fide reason for the different treatment, especially knowing how the Disabled Driver is treated by S G Bond, Martin, and Howie.

Question, “Why are non – disabled drivers not selected for Special harassment and discriminated against, as the disabled and diabetic drivers are?”

Questions, “Why are diabetic drivers and disabled drivers subject to this Discrimination of this Scale differentiation?” and “What's it based upon?”

Answer, “The lies, thefts, falsification of documents, attacks, assaults, and defamation of character, as I've experienced, establish a Process of Differential, Discriminatory, and Prejudicial treatment of the disabled?”

My point is, the Disabled Policy is based upon fear and loathing of the disabled. It's based upon bias, disgust, contempt, discrimination, bigotry, and prejudice; an Old Way of thinking, a process of Group – Think of Wrong – Thinking toward the Minority and People of Difference. It's based on Hate, as how else can we define those doing this to me when they cannot inform the Public that I do care for myself. It's based upon Hate as the policy cannot do what it's alleged to be able to do. And, how could they support their Intervention, knowing the consequences of the Intervention are horrific, if not based upon Hate?

My point is, all this needs to be set up as acceptable, and that's why the Scale of the driver mishap listings has been changed.

My point is, this change in the Standard Presentation of driver mishap is deliberate; it's Prejudicial to say the least.

My point is, Scale has been manipulated to present something that is not, to seem as if it is.

*

Scientific Article

Reader, lets go back to the one or two page articles from Dobbs and the stolen research presented to justify a Social Policy that is known to kill and maime.

A Scientific Article or Paper will include an Abstract and the seven or eight Procedural steps that are used to complete an experiment.

Question, “How is all this done and explained with only one page or two pages if the Experiment is to be Peered Reviewed for bona fide (ness), leading to use as Social Policy or Medical Policy, and an Intervention?”

Question, “When one eliminates the “stuff” from Dobbs' “Curriculum Vitae”, what is left to support the pedestal Dobbs has contrived and placed herself upon as the expert?”

For readers to just accept what she has written as Bona fide, Truthful, and Relevant to the subject at hand is not acceptable?

My point is, when you read Dobbs Curriculum Vitae for what she has done, remember that she is not the Principle Researcher on All or most of the work she's involved in. Remember, she's the third, or fourth, or fifth person involved.

Question, “What's this fact have you understanding of where Dobbs really is in the world of Research, as compared to the talks, presentations, and conferences she presents in?”

Talks are not bona fide research to make bona fide Social Policy with. Dobbs' bona fide research is in journals or online and available to those making Policy and she would be contacted for the Rights to Use and she knows this. No, the talks are just that, talks and a night out for so many just interested in the field or working in the field. The pages of talks and conventions are not relevant and are just “Stuff” to bamboozle.

Actually, the excessive “Opening Review” really set the Standard of what was to follow. When the Curriculum Vitae was Deconstructed, it seemed every time she picked up a pen or typed something, whether a note or one page on something, it went into her Curriculum Vitae. Thirty two pages of self indulgence but nothing concerning Diabetes, Diabetes and Driving, Diabetics and how they care for themselves, or how General Practitioners care for diabetics through the Scientific Method, and best of all, nothing concerning Hypoglycemia, (the very reason for the illegal policy).

My point is, what's that say to the reader about who Dobbs really is and what kind of un – Scientific Game she's playing?



Questions, “When the charade of the Curriculum Vitae is understood, one needs to return to Dobbs' Opening Review to read again and again to see what she states she has really done, (20 000 articles reviewed), this can be done but know you know what Dobbs really is, do you believe she's done this?” and “What is really bona fide, and how is she evaluating articles for authenticity and bona fide (ness) used to justify an Illegal Social Policy that is known to kill?” and “Do you believe Dobbs would work for 900 000 pages of Permission Forms?”

Question, what I mean by this is, as I've Deconstructed her Curriculum Vitae, and found it wanting, meaning we must apply the same to the Opening Review, as the Curriculum Vitae is just Noise, Fluff, and Stuff, which forces us to question whether or not her Opening Review really has taken place or has she just written “What is Expected”?

Answer, “Reader, you expect Dobbs to access these online sites or libraries, so she just tells you what you want to hear. I also surfed the net, went to libraries and diabetic clinics, read books on diabetes from diabetic specialists, nurses and doctors, and asked the Government for their Research to justify the Policy and the Consequences.”

Questions, “Why didn't Dobbs state she asked the Government for its Research proving a Need and what was used to Justify the killing and maiming?” and “She pretends her References, through her Opening Review, fulfill the demands of the Charter, HR Code, and the MVA and the Five Steps of Engagement, so why didn't Dobbs just state this?”

Answer, “Dobbs offers nothing from Government; Martin and Howie offer nothing.”

Answer, “Because her References do not do what she says they do.”

My point is, I've told you what I didn't find, therefore my Discrimination Complaint; Dobbs has not tell what she didn't find, she steals, lies, Pads, and misleads about what's she's doing.

Questions, “Where's the bona fide research on Diabetes and Driving, Hypoglycemia, proof the Intervention does not Harm and offers Good?” and “Where's the acknowledgment that diabetics do visit his or her G P?”

My point is, again, Dobbs' Opening Review is in excess, as is her Curriculum Vitae, both presented as something Grand and Absolutely fulfilling the Standards of Scientific Inquiry and the Scientific Method, therefore bona fide, and yet the References do not fulfill the Opening Review Stuff and Curriculum Vitae Stuff and Dobbs knows this. It's just more BBB.

Lastly, again, the “References”, the stolen material, it really was in excess, it's just a collection of a few bona fide science articles, some dealing with diabetes and type 2, articles mentioning diabetes and things related, from as early as 1950.

Question, “We're to base Social Policy on something written 60 years ago?”

My point is, type 2 designation had not been invented yet.

There were reviews mentioning diabetes and things related as early as 1950, (Women were still being forced from the workplace after WWII, not allowed to be lawyers and doctors and other Professionals, etc, etc, and Indians, First Nations Peoples today, were not to leave the Reserve.

Question, “Dobbs wants today's Social Policy to be based upon that Old Thinking?”

The References were mostly “Stuff”, Padding, laid out under the Trust of Affidavit and Oath that all was Legal to use, but when Deconstructed one must look for research more than one page, two pages, or even three pages, if the article is to used as bona fide research to justify Social Policy; not just some book from 1950, with a reference to diabetes.

This excess was consciously contrived to bully, to deceive, and to intimidate the reader, especially the non – academic or backyard diabetic interested in their disease; two hundred items were listed, but as far as I know none Peer Reviewed for type 2 diabetes and an Intervention. Some material was fifty years old or older, some I did not know what it was, maybe a scrap of paper she picked up on the floor that had the word diabetes or diabetic on it, or an online article mentioning diabetes, numerous references with no documentation of what it was, or where it came from, or who wrote it.

My point is, this Padding is not bona fide References to legally justify a Social Policy with, a PhD with, or a bona fide Scientific paper with.

There was research I presented that proved there is no difference in driver mishaps between non – diabetic drivers and type 2 drivers. That's right, Dobbs used the same research I used to justify my claim of Discrimination. Maybe Dobbs should have read the documents she stole.

My point is, Dobbs' Opening Review absolutely guarantees she has read and evaluated all materials.

Two hundred articles, very impressive and daunting, but through my research at the library and online I knew it was Bullshit, the real triple B's, BBB, as there is not a World Body of Work on type 2 diabetes of this magnitude, little lone for type 2 diabetic driver mishaps. Reader, there may not be that Body of Work on type 1 diabetes and driving, hypoglycemia, and the Intervention.

Question, “Why?”

Answer, “Because modern, scientific, type 2 diabetic driver research proved a Policy is not needed, therefore Science done for Peer Review, leading to an Intervention is not needed. If Dobbs really did read what she states she did, she absolutely knows this.

And Dobbs stated she did the most comprehensive research investigation possible.

Reader, when you reread Dobbs Curriculum Vitae and compare it to what Dobbs has bragged about in her Opening Review remember the above, which will again exemplify the BBB of Dobbs.

Valid and bona fide Science does not need the BBB of Dobbs. It stands by itself.

*

Something Wrong

Reader, Dobbs' work is impressive, and we cannot deny this, with some bona fide work and some doing Good, but something changed to do what she has done to me, a type 2 diabetic, a type 2 diabetic driver, therefore all disabled.

My point is, the point to be made about presenting Dobbs' Oath and Affidavit, her Resume, Curriculum Vitae, and References exemplifies that Dobbs really does know about Scientific Inquiry and Scientific Method, peer reviews, Copyright, Intellectual Property Rights, and Intent of Use protection devices. By default, as an Academic and Scholar, she also knows about the demands of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, the Human Rights Code, the Motor Vehicle Act, and Oaths of Office. Which demands us to ask;

Question, “Why didn't Dobbs apply these World Scientific Standards and Canadian Laws that made her, to justify the Policy Papers or Guide, she's contrived against me, the type 2 diabetic driver, and the disabled?”



Reader, these 'Policy Papers' and 'BCHRT Presentation' I reviewed and the 'Guide' that Dobbs is presenting is not a one page paper, they are governed by something, as so much of Dobbs' work is. This is not a invited ten minute talk to a convention of some kind, as she does. Not so called “teaching” university students, where she is not a teacher, she instructs. Not a contract to “review” material for the OSMV and then do it again two years later, mentioned above.

This is a Social Policy of a “democratic society”, Canada, which by default must fulfill the demands of the Charter, the HR Code, and the MVA, before Government can stick its face into the Public's life. The Policy must be justified with bona fide research, where no one is harmed. And if the Need is proved as needed, an Intervention is then composed.

This Intervention must be proved as non – harmful through Sanctioned Non – Human experiments, all managed by an approved Governing Body and Code of Ethics, which will lead to Sanctioned Human Experiments to prove the Intervention does not harm the interested party, the diabetic or disabled person, and can really do what it's alleged to be able to do, proving a Need for a large cohort Human Experiment proving a Need for a Diabetic Drivers' Policy and an Intervention.

Secondly, this also means the naïve bystander is not harmed, that there is Proven Good, and that if the Public or person of 'interest', diabetics in my case, is caring for themselves, or managing the 'interest', and that care is better or equivalent to the Intervention, then this must be acknowledged and applied to the matter at hand.

My point is, in other words, if the person of interest is caring for themselves this needs to be acknowledged. If the care is better than an Intervention why duplicate the visit to the G P for a lesser examination.

Not fulfilling the above exemplifies corruption of the Laws of Canada and Humanity, and corrupts Science, as phoney Science or pseudo Science has raised it's ugly face, through Dobbs, an academic researcher, as she hasn't done any of the above and through her presentation of Scientific format wants all readers to believe she has fulfilled the demands of Canada, Humanity, and Science.

Question, “How is it that Dobbs knows Right from Wrong, Good and Bad, and does not apply this to me and her Presentation?”

My point is, somewhere there is a break, some kind of Disillusionment concerning Right and Wrong and Good and Bad.



Questions, “The above and more was within my initial inquiry, the BCHRT Discrimination complaints, my Deconstruction of her Drafts and Policy, and were all available to Dobbs, as were the Laws of Canada, my Five Steps of Engagement, the Scientific Method, and Standards of Science to guide Dobbs, so why hasn't she used any of the above to prove or justify her position, as was done with her PhD?” and “Why has she listed what she has in her Opening Review and Curriculum Vitae and not followed the very things she writes that make her?”

My point is, her behaviour really is blatant corruption, wide open for all to see, overt to be in the readers face; demanding confrontation; like the Bully, I dare you. Like Martins attack and assault; I dare you to try and do something.

Question, “Does Dobbs really believe all she has done is Right?”

Question, “Does Dobbs really believe Social Policy is based upon corrupted Science, stolen Science, lies and theft, broken Oaths, and falsified documents?”

My point is, this is balanced off with a full – time permanent job with Government, pension, work for her husband, power, prestige, manipulating the non – Scientific Public, reinforcing her pedestal, and the delight and rush that comes from deviant behaviour and breaking the laws of Canada. And we need to add the knowledge that what she is doing, covering – up the killing and maiming, may be exciting to her.

Question, “What Dobbs has done is not “Something Wrong”?”

Reader, as Dobbs has done this to me, a diabetic, what is she really doing to Seniors now? Her deviant behaviour has escalated, as Martin's did when he attacked, assaulted, and denigrated my character with his Personal Attack.

*

Dobbs has put herself on a pedestal and said 'Just Believe', 'Just Believe'. Hold it. Hold it. She never did the things she knows she needs to do to justify the policy. What has happened to Dobbs? Today, she's no different than Howie, the Deputy Superintendent of Motor Vehicles, that said it's ok to base the policy on her point of “view” of life. Sorry, not Good enough. With Dobbs we know she's deeply in love with herself as her Curriculum Vitae proves to a fault, – Narcissistic? – , and we know she's a liar and thief. We know Howie is also a liar and thief, as she's running this illegal policy and has hired Dobbs to prove her policy as legal; at any cost. As with Howie's “view” of life, Dobbs' “view” of life is not worth following either, certainly not for Social Policy.

No, Dobbs' is a flimflam girl, just writing, saying what she and her colleagues want you to hear; words of Science, something that offers contact with a proven Trust, (Science and the Affidavit), Trust established by Scientific Rules and Regulations and its Scientific Method, Canadian Laws, a Trusted Due Process established by the same, and a page of her Curriculum Vitae, C V, boasting of Positions and Affiliation with the U of A, and Dobbs hits on all the points; done to consciously mislead.

Dobbs has stayed with the OSMV, as it is corrupt, full of liars, thieves, brutes, bullies, thugs, traitors, and murders. They liked her earlier deviant behaviour so much they gave her the job of contriving the Guide; the phoney Drafts and Policy she sent to me and the BCHRT Presentation of stolen Science was her application so to speak, her Gang Initiation. And all defined as a Crime Against Humanity, as they're consciously attacking not just one person but the Public, British Columbians, and Canada, denying the Public it's Rights, Denigrating the Disabled, Injuring the disabled's Dignity and Self – respect.

My point is, Bona Fide “academic researcher” (s) and Scientists do not do this.

My point is, it must be remembered Dobbs has a B A Psychology and Ph D in Gerontology and by default knows what Un – Sanctioned Human Experiments are. By default, as a working “academic researcher”, she knows what Crimes Against Humanity are and she knows what Genocide is.

Question, “How deep is her husband's involvement in this Crime Against Humanity, as her CV shows he has worked with her many times, and now he's taken us to the Brink of Genocide?”

My point is, he's taken us to the Brink of Genocide with his Un – Sanctioned Human Experiment upon Senior drivers with Dobbs research on Seniors and she's recording the Harm.

Questions, “Dobbs thinks her behaviour is Right?” and “That you and I should “Just Believe”?”

*

Questions, “Are you one of the millions of people that “Just Trust” Scientific presentations because of the established Trust of Scientific Inquiry, through the Scientific Method and Peer Review?” You and I should be able to Trust.

“Are you one of the millions of people that “Just Trust”, as there's thirty – two pages of “Stuff” written to inform you that the author of the BCHRT Presentation is bona fide?” You should be able to just Trust.

“Do you just Trust, as the Recommendations and Intervention and the Consequences of the Intervention are bona fide and not harmful, as you know Interventions are not allowed to harm, established through World Standards of Science, Codes of Ethics, and Law?” You should be able to Trust.

My point is, with the people I'm exposing and what they're doing one cannot just accept their Representative, Dobbs, the “academic researcher”, as having fulfilled or followed the above, as she's proven she's not Trustworthy. Which by default means nothing her husband offers is Trustworthy either.

So, you read Dobbs and discover she has done nothing in the field of diabetes, hypoglycemia, diabetes and driving, or the Intervention. She uses her Opening Review to bullshit you into relaxation, to let your guard down, manipulating you into believing she's the Great Academic, the Scholar, the Great Hope, therefore you can just Believe; she uses the Curriculum Vitae as BBB, done to manipulate the Reader. She uses her Oath, the Affidavit, Opening Review and Curriculum Vitae to mislead, misinform, and misrepresent, as to who she is and what she's really doing, which is a breach of her Oath of Office to say the least, and what this does to the Trust of Academia and Science is horrific.

Dobbs' Curriculum Vitae exemplifies one in love with themselves, one so insecure she documents every high school letter and picture contest, one with such an inflated sense of self it's sad, one trying to bullshit themselves through things, one knowing Bullshit Baffles Brains, so she uses a BA psychology and a PhD, now calling herself a Dr., in order to Baffle Brains.

Questions, “What about the Scientific Process that made her to carry herself through?” and “What about the “rule of law” that made her?” and “What about the “supremacy of God” that does not allow her to kill and maime, as an “academic researcher”?”

What she's also telling us is that with such a long Curriculum Vitae, (a Resume really), so called Scholarship, she sees everyone else as just crass plebeians whom should “Just believe” and “Just Trust”, as she's on the same level as the “supremacy of God” and can do what she considers to be needed in her “view” of life, and if a few hundred naïve bystanders are killed yearly by this illegal policy so be it.

My point is, that's what Dobbs is really saying and implementing with her writing.

Question, “Why the quote from the Charter?”

Because Dobbs and her employers know the policy is illegal, not proved as needed, and they know the consequences of the Policy kill and maime. For Dobbs to support such an anti – Human policy, an anti – Life policy, knowing her lies and theft have been contrived and offered to support this killing, means she has put herself on the same level or higher than the “supremacy of God”. This means she believes it's ok to lie and steal to justify a killing policy against the disabled.

Questions, “What's this say about Dobbs' Standards concerning her own research and publications?” and “As they do not seem to be Peer Reviewed for Policy, how do we really know what she has done and its real influence?”.

Question, “When the Padding, the BBB, and the “Stuff” has been taken away from Dobbs' Opening Review and Curriculum Vitae what does Dobbs really offer concerning the Policy Papers concerning one hundred different medical conditions she's writing about?”

Answer, “The only thing we can accept is that she knows how to put together papers, articles, and presentations but what kind of value and worth do they really have concerning disabled driving policies?”

Question, “We know she's a liar and thief. Has Dobbs ever fulfilled the Demands of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, the BC Human Rights Code, and the demands of the Motor Vehicle Act for a Social Policy?”

Answer, “Nothing in her BCHRT Presentation, her Curriculum Vitae, states she has done anything such as this.” Absolutely Nothing.

My point is, my bona fide questions changed Policy and have forced Government to obey the Laws; but in reality they only feign to be obeying the law, and the killing and discrimination continues for unknown reasons.

Question, “What's Dobbs pretending to be?”

So, as of today, Dobbs Broke the Oath she mentioned in her Opening Review, Breached the Trust of the Affidavit, Stole Protected Research, used Research for uses it was never intended to be used for, never fulfilled the demands of Scientific Inquiry and the Scientific Method, mislead that she has fulfilled the demands of the Charter, the HR Code, the MVA, therefore her Oath of Office, and has not fulfilled the Promise to send me her Guide; another broken Trust.

Question, “And you and I are supposed to believe the Guide she was supposed to send me is bona fide and legal?”

Question, “What has happened to Dobbs for her to believe anyone would believe what she is doing now is believable or bona fide, after what she has done to me, her colleagues, Trusts, Affidavits, the Public, B C, the U of A, and Canada?”

My point is, as Martin is running this, therefore Dobbs, and he personally attacked and assaulted me last year for exposing him and his illegal policy and killing to ICBC, and I am exposing him again, if he kills me this time you know what to challenge him and his corrupt colleagues with.

Reader, just in case I am killed, the blog site I use now accepts letters of this length. So, if S G Bond, Martin, Howie and their colleagues state they do not have my correspondence you can go to the blog, as they cannot cancel the site; www.2diabetes.blogspot.com

*

What do we have with Dobbs?

Question, “Reader, the above is what Dobbs has done and you don't think she has a Mental Health condition?”

Answer, “One in five Canadians will experience Mental Health issues.”

My point is, although Dobbs puts herself about the “supremacy of God”, she's not above mental health issues; or maybe this proves she has.

She knows the Policy is illegal, does not have Science to justify the Policy, that it kills and maims and yet she defends it showing no Empathy for those being killed or the survivors; or she would have stopped doing what she is doing.

No one forced Dobbs to do this; she volunteered to work for the Government; for salary rather than contract work, as she listed her previous work was, for permanent full – time work and a pension, to work unrestricted, not limited by the boundaries of Science, for guaranteed protection for her deviant behaviour, for some kind of twisted, perverted sense of prestige and status, the joy of being criminally involved in a Crime against Humanity, and a lust power over life and death.



S G Bond, Martin, and Howie also have Mental Health issues to do what they're doing; they've continued on with a policy that's known to be illegal and harmful; they could have quit or stopped the policy until legally justified, as they also knew it offered no Good. These people get together and believe they're ok. They're not. As stated above it's Old Thinking. It's Group – Think of Wrong – Thinking, as exemplified by the Sanctioned Human Experiments that went absolutely Wrong. (“Human Experiments”, following this section)

Question, “Reader, you really don't think Dobbs has problems?”

Question, “Or, is she just a low life Nazi, stealing and lying to do what she wants to do and the heck with the Laws of Canada, a “democratic society”, Laws of Science, and Laws of Humanity?”

My point is, all done with the promise from the Attorney General's Office to defend her at all cost.

Question, “As I'm the only one that's confronted her, her deviant behaviour has been reinforced with the fear and apathy shown to her, so she's now moving on with her husband to attack and experiment on Seniors and you don't think she has a problem?”

My point is, Nazis have Mental Health issues. And Dobbs is a Nazi, as her behaviour proves she cares nothing for our “democratic society”, and its “rule of law”, and the “supremacy of God”, little lone the laws of Humanity, our Human Rights Code, and the laws of Science that made her.

So, we know Dobbs is a Nazi, because she cares nothing for our “democratic society”, therefore by default she has Mental Health issues.

Secondly, Dobbs has mental health issues for stealing and lying and abusing the Trust of her colleagues and the Public.

Third, Dobbs has mental health issues for disregarding and dismissing all that made her.

*

Why would Dobbs do this?

Question, “Why would Dobbs do this, to steal and lie and throw what's made her to the wind, or into the garbage, or pretend these Rules and Regulation are not there Governing her behaviour?”

Firstly, she believes she's above those not educated and maybe all Humanity, as she has a PhD, and non – academics are not smart enough to understand her charades; they are beneath her. Her colleagues must be also be seen as beneath her, as she stole their research.

Secondly, she works with Seniors, which sets her up, as someone nice and cuddly, who takes care of our parents and she's been placed upon a pedestal of irreproachably.

Third, who would believe an Academic or Scholar, that's what a PhD means, would abuse the very World of Scholarship and Science that made her.

Fourth, as stated above there is very little research on type 2 diabetic drivers and hypoglycemia, as the research I read disproved the lies coming from people like Martin, Howie, and the anti – diabetic lobby, so researchers do not research something that does not need to be done and I have not read any research that disproves these peer reviewed research studies. So, Dobbs Pads her work, knowing the work will not be Peer Reviewed, and who's going to challenge a Government Senior Public Servant with a PhD.

Dobbs is so confused about not having Science to justify the policy and harm she used the very research I used to justify my claim of Discrimination, to disapprove my Discrimination Complaint; a charade played to make the reader believe the PhD presentation is above the deconstruction her PhD paper withstood. Dobbs gambled, using her status and prestige, gambled with BBB that an excess of material would stop any inquiry into her presentation, as she really believes the pedestal she has built for herself is untouchable.

Fifth, she knew the S G and the A G Offices would protect her, as they did with the criminals involved in the BC Rail corruption, and as they did by protecting Martin and Howie for running an illegal policy that they know harms, kills and maims, and abuses our Universal Health Care System. (remember Dobbs reviewed medical conditions for the OSMV in 2006, mentioned above, so she knew the AG Office was protecting Martin, Howie, and their Gangster Buddies even then).

Lastly, Dobbs believes she's above the “supremacy of God” and the “rule of law” that our Country is based upon; how else can she explain her volunteering to cover – up an illegal policy that's known to kill and maime?



Question, “Has Dobbs really experiencing a Mental Health break from what made her and reality?”

Answer, “I don't know.” She consciously knows what's she doing or how could she play the charades she's contrived to deceive? On the other hand, I think it's right to say we know mental health issues can also lead to complex manipulative behaviour that is hard to accept, as not real.

So, as she does not live and practice a Democratic life, has abused Science, and knows she's involved in killing, and trying to hide it, I don't think she has insolvable or deep mental health issues, Dobbs just decided to dump what made her, and move for more money, power, and prestige, with no accountability and responsibility, but mental health issues have changed Dobbs.

Dobbs' behaviour fulfills the definition of Fascist, but with the corruption of Science and the killing she's involved in, (she's involved and just as guilty as she's trying to cover – up the illegal policy and its consequences with stolen research and lies), this moves her into the political field of being a Nazi.

Questions, “Reader, it's a nasty term to use but Dobbs fulfills the description; I'm the Democrat here. Wait until you're disabled and she comes after you or your kids or parents or grandparents and then tell me what you think she is?” and “What will you think when Dobbs and her husband involve your parents in an Un – Sanctioned Human Brain and Mind Experiment?”

My point is, I don't need to be quiet about this Nazi “academic researcher”, a PhD scholar that wrongly addresses herself as “Dr.”, that's involved in illegal policy and Un – Sanctioned Human Experiments.

*

Democracies such as Canada need to acknowledge Nazis, but we do not need to be quiet about them and their killing.

Again, Dobbs' inflated opinion of herself and Presentation does not justify the policy, it does not justify that the Intervention can do what it's alleged to be able to do, or justify the Consequences of the Intervention, or justify the fact no one has proved any Good coming from the Policy, proving it should continue, and Dobbs does not justify her reluctance to not acknowledge I visit the G P for diabetic care.

Nazis never acknowledge the Personal Care, therefore the Societal Care, of those they're attacking, as it then makes the hunted Human also.

*

Fulfilling my “Five Steps of Engagement” or “Procedures within the Scientific Method of Inquiry”, are what made her and it's not acceptable that she doesn't know this anymore.

All experiments must acknowledge what is happening to or with the clients or subjects, in this instance, the diabetic driver. Dobbs consciously refused to acknowledge this fact. This is a conscious lie, as her training has instilled this process into her 'Being'; her denial of Personal Diabetic Care, is not acceptable. If Dobbs refused to acknowledged medications Seniors use, her behaviour or Intervention could kill them.

Question, “She would do this?”

Answer, “Yes, as she has now proved she does not acknowledge Care diabetics do for themselves.”

My point is, we must accept this, as she's proved she cannot acknowledge diabetics do care for themselves. By not acknowledging this Care, Dobbs has lied. This is a Really Big Lie, as Dobbs has deliberately mislead Readers, as to what is really happening, which then supposedly gives her an excuse to support and implement the phoney Driver's Medical Examination, which really is an Un – Sanctioned Human Experiment and she knows this.

It is a Human Experiment, and yet not spoken of or acknowledged as one. The DME is set up and run to collect data as part of discovering information concerning diabetic drivers and other disabled drivers, or people labeled as Disabled by the Office of the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles. It's the Intervention phase of a Human Experiment, coming from a supposedly justified Experiment giving the OSMV the Right to play out an Intervention, that has also been proved to be Not Harmful.

My point is, you now know the lie from the OSMV, that the collection of information is bona fide. You know the Policy has not been proven to be Needed, and as Not Needed, how can an Intervention be legally Researched for bona fide (ness), if there is no proven Need to correct? Dobbs knows all this, as she's an “academic researcher” and has the PhD.

The diabetic or disabled Driver's Medical Examination is absolutely an Un – Sanctioned Human Experiment, done on a Grand Scale, over a long – time, done through forcing G Ps to comply, which gives the DME a phoney sense of bona fide (ness), if the G P does not comply he or she will be penalized by Government for non – compliance. Dobbs also knows this about the DME

Question, “Why have unknown Doctors in the BCMA supported this illegal policy and its Un – Sanctioned Human Experiment, and bowed to the Treats of people like S G Bond, Martin, and Howie?”

*

Mental Illness; Dementia

There really is something wrong with Dobbs to do what she has done and continues to do. Reader, I don't know how many different kinds of Mental Illness, or levels, grades, or types of Dementia there are, but Dobbs studies Dementia and Seniors, and as with Cancer, we seem to be discovering different types yearly. People with Dementia do not know they have a mental illness. What Dobbs has done to herself is wrong; she's hurting herself. What she is doing to me is wrong; she's hurting me. Her support of Government with their illegal policies is wrong; she's supporting the killing and maiming of the naïve bystander, which means she's harming herself, as she's now involved in Homicide and she's harming people for no bona fide reason, the diabetic and the naïve bystander, as this is not War.

My point is, if Dobbs does have a Mental Illness what S G Bond, Martin, Howie and their colleagues have and are doing to Dobbs is Wrong. We know they're liars, brutes, thieves, bullies, traitors, and they know they know their illegal policy kills and maims. So, what does this make them? It makes them Murders. They're defined as Human Monsters for sure.

Question, “From this perspective, have they seen this Conflict I expose, Dobbs' Conflict with Right and Wrong, and Good and Bad, the Narcissism in Dobbs, and taken advantage of her?”

My point is, we know they're monsters and maybe, just maybe, they collected someone who's broken, to use for their own delight, to entertain themselves with, and to do their bidding, to be their fall guy or Scapegoat if needed.

Question, “It's said twenty percent of Canadians will experience some form of Mental Health Issue, why not Dobbs?”

My point is, on the other hand, Dobbs' greed and lust for money, fame, status, and prestige has taken her to places where she should not go. No one, especially someone as educated as Dobbs should go where she has gone. The diabetic policy really is an Un – Sanctioned Human Experiment, therefore a Crime Against Humanity that she's decided to support. She knows this.



In Dobbs' confusion, if we're to say she has a Mental Illness, she's now taken her mad reasoning, taken herself to Experiment on Seniors, for no bona fide reason. It's another Un – Sanctioned Human Experiment, which is another Crime Against Humanity, where the first Senior her husband's Un – Sanctioned Human Experiment kills, therefore her behaviour kills, due to the stress' and stains she's researched concerning Seniors and applying to Seniors, that she knows can kill Seniors, moves her behaviour into Genocide. By default Dobbs knows all this.

Dobbs has severe mental health issues to do what she's done, continuing to do, and now escalate her deviant behaviour to another vulnerable Class of Society. Dobbs has fallen from Grace to say the least.

Dobbs' Place or Standing within the Scientific community should be invalidated, as she's abandoned their Rules and Regulations. She does not have a Public life of the so called expertise or bona fide witness, as she's abandoned the “rules of law” and the “supremacy of God” of Canada. Dobbs is nothing anymore and she's fallen as far as Martin has, when he attacked and assaulted me and raped my character all because I would not bow down to him and kiss his ass. Dobbs and her husband are monsters of the Human Species, as Martin is. That's why they associate and work for him.

My point is, “academic researchers” know Big Ideas and live Scale of what they are doing and its impact on Society; they make Connections.

Question, “Does Dobbs really know what she's done?”

Question, “Are we to believe Dobbs does not understand Big Ideas, Scale, Connections, and Context anymore, so all she does are just independent incidents and not connected?”

Question, “Dobbs knows Dementia does not only express to just “old” Seniors, and she knows what she's doing, so what do we make of this?”

Reader, as Dobbs has not previously proved the diabetic policy as needed, and her BCHRT Presentation was just noise, Canada must assume the same for her Guide or she would have sent it to me. Dobbs and S G Bond, Martin, and Howie, would have sent it to me immediately and said here you go Jenkins, all the demands of the Charter, the HR Code, and the MVA have been fulfilled and you can now stop worrying that diabetic and the disabled drivers have been Discriminated against and the killing and maiming in Emerge is acceptable.

But Dobbs didn't do that, she hid her work from me, because she knows her work is more BBB. Dobbs has deep mental health issues to do something like this.

My point is, this doesn't mean she cannot be held accountable for her behaviour. Dobbs knows my complaints about Discrimination are valid and sound. My demands for Equality and Inclusion in Canada forced corrupt government officials to try and justify their behaviour and they haven't knowing the harm continues.

My point is, Dobbs was hired to protect S G Bond, Martin, Howie and their Gangster buddies, not write bona fide policy. My demands, coming from the demands of Canada's laws, gave Dobbs her job, she lives off my taxes, she contrived some kind of Guide for Driving, supposedly fulfilling the demands of our Democracy and then hide it from the very person responsible for her livelihood. She hid what was demanded of her.

My point is, this “hiding” is no different than the “hiding” Dobbs did with my Diabetic Personal G P care; which is an absolute Wrong in the World, the Scientific Community, and in connection to Human Experiments.

Dobbs hid it because she has not fulfilled what is demanded of her for Canada. She hid it because it was contrived to protect S G Bond, Martin, Howie, and their corrupt colleagues.

All this means is Dobbs has Mental Health issues and that she really is a Nazi, hiding yourself in Canada's bureaucracy, living out your sick dream of power and harm. One way or the other Dobbs has deep psychological, cognitive problems and needs help. And I don't need to be quiet about people like Dobbs.



As Dobbs has not proved the diabetic policy as Needed, nor that the Consequences are acceptable, and her BCHRT Presentation was just noise, that she is a thief and liar, Canada must assume the same for her policy against Seniors.

If her new attack upon Canada, against Seniors and their Rights, was bona fide S G Bond, Martin, Howie, Dobbs and her husband would have given the initial Experiments to the Press and NDP MLA Simons, to prove the Experiment has been previously proved as bona fide and any Intervention proved as not harmful. These Experiments would have proved the Senior Human Cognitive Experiment is bona fide and legal, and she offered nothing.

These documents would have proved the computer toy used to illegally evaluate Seniors' Cognitive Skills and Abilities is bona fide, and there is no harm. And yet, Dobbs, S G Bond, Martin, Howie, and their colleagues have falsely contrived allegations that stress and strain Senior Drivers before they're forced to undergo the Cognitive testing, the Brain and Mind testing, Dobbs are involved in with her husband.

My point is, Dobbs has again “hidden” what she is doing to Seniors to stress and strain them before the illegal testing.

Dobbs' new Senior Drivers' Policy is illegal, and the charade of the computer toy supposedly evaluating Cognitive Skills and Abilities is an Un – Sanctioned, Un – Ethical, Immoral, Social Psychological Human Experiment being played out on Seniors, who have been manipulated to be “stressed out” for Experimenting.

Question, “Dobbs why have you and your husband hidden this work also?”

*

Who is Bonnie M Dobbs Really?; what about “Nursing”

Reader, we do not need to place our Birth date on documents anymore due to the Discrimination that comes with that.

Dobbs Curriculum Vitae states she completed her BA Psychology in 1992. It usually takes four years to do a BA. So, maybe she began in 1988, usually beginning at eighteen years of age. So, Dobbs was born around 1970, therefore she's about 42.

I don't think so. Dobbs was with S G Bond when Simmons, NDP MLA, February 8, 2012, Global, Catherine Pope, was representing Seniors in Powell River, concerning this illegal Un – Sanctioned Human Experiment being played on Seniors, where S G Bond was snippy, sarcastic, and condescending concerning the legality of this new policy. The Dobbs on TV, the Great “Academic Researcher” was not 42, maybe 62 or older.

My point is, during my Inquiry into this policy over the past ten years someone mentioned Dobbs was a former Nurse. This is not on her Curriculum Vitae. However, Bonnie M Dobbs' Curriculum Vitae has numerous references to work she did while “Bonnie M French”, who published with someone named “Dobbs”. The College & Association of Registered Nurses of Alberta, (online), has a “Bonnie M French”, who is “Non – Practicing”.

Question, “What are the odds that this is a different Bonnie M Dobbs?”

Question, “Nursing is a Honourable Profession, it takes four years of education to become a Nurse, so why hasn't Dobbs included these four years of Education and years of work in the Profession of Nursing into her Curriculum Vitae, as she lists very banal items to stroke her ego?”

Question, “Did something horrible happen so that Dobbs left nursing and does not want to be reminded about it or have others remind her of it?”

Question, “As it has been proved Dobbs “hides” things, what has she “hidden” here?”

Question, “Were these years of Nursing where Dobbs became infatuated with Seniors and mental health?”

Questions, “Did something happen with Nursing, with Seniors, that Dobbs does not want to revisit or have the Public know about?”, which leads to, “Did something happen to Dobbs with Seniors, to instigate her study of Seniors, and now her actions are a payback?”

Question, “Dobbs knows the ages of where Dementia can express. She knows the indicators. Does Dobbs know she has early Dementia, and that's why she has not listed Nursing, as her age will be known and her behaviour questioned due to her age?”

My point is, we need to ask this, as Dobbs' behaviour is not acceptable for someone with a Nursing Degree, then twenty years later a BA psychology, then a PhD. Someone that bases her Whole Being on fulfilling Rules and Regulations and the absolute Trust that she will not Harm.

So, to Dementia we need to include Schizophrenia, and Borderline Personality Disorder, maybe Bipolar disease and other disorders that may explain the corruption of the World Standards of Science that has made Dobbs and the 'why' of why she continues on knowing she's part of the killing and maiming of the naïve bystander.

Questions, “Why would Dobbs hide twenty years of work in a very Honourable Profession?” and “What happened to Dobbs that she's so embarrassed or protective she cannot mention such an Honourable Profession?”

My point is, as Dobbs has stolen and lied, has padded her Opening Review, padded her Curriculum Vitae, has padded her References, but not informed readers of her years as a Nurse, she has therefore mislead readers, as to her full history of Academia and Scholarship; her Curriculum Vitae was 'contrived' to mislead, instead of being 'composed' to inform.

My point is, once again Dobbs is “lying” and “hiding” about who she is and what she's about.



*

Human Experiments

The Social Psychological Experiments; Milgram Experiment, Jane Elliott's diversity training, and the Stanford Prison Experiment.

or

More appropriately understood as “Group – Think of Wrong – Thinking”.

By default Dobbs knows of these Social – Psychological, bona fide, Sanctioned, Human Experiments, managed by a Governing Body and Code of Ethics; Elliot's “diversity training” is different, as she designed and implemented a teaching lesson to demonstrate how fast Prejudice Grows. These Human Experiments were played out and stopped when the researchers discovered, much to their dismay, how their subjects, Humans, behaved. These were precedent setting discoveries, bona fide discoveries concerning Human Interactions, proving how quickly we turn on ourselves, harm others, and follow authoritative figures, doing their killing and maiming if not stopped. People doing this knowing they are doing Wrong and Bad or Harm.

These experiments also proved that there are people who stand up to Wrong and Bad or Harm. People like me. That they also stand up to Hate, Bigotry, Discrimination, and Prejudice, even when they unintentionally express, and yet some Humans carry on, as if their behaviour is acceptable, which it is not.

Dobbs knows this, but she is not the Scientist or Teacher in the above Experiments and Teaching lesson that stopped the deviant behaviour, she's the Human that carries on, knowing the Harm, Bigotry, Discrimination, and Prejudice she's supporting and acting out. S G Bond, Martin, Howie, and their supporters also know this, as they're also educated people.

By default, Dobbs knows she's harming, an active participant in the harm, misleading and misinforming about what is actually happening, therefore trying to justify the harm buy stealing documents and lying. She's doing this knowing the disabled policies are illegal, not managed by a bona fide Governing Body and Code of Ethics to stop any perverted, abnormal, unethical, and Wrong behaviour and Bad or Harm.

These are Standard Protocol concerning Human Experiments that she's put herself above.

Now apply this to her support and involvement with her husbands Un – Sanctioned Human Experiments. Monsters all to say the least. Absolute Nazis and I don't need to be quiet about them and their behaviour.

*

Reader, you are not going to find better “Human Experiments” to understand how corrupt this policy is and how quickly some of us descend into madness, lack of ethics and morals, and corruption. They really are the precedent setting Human Experiments to guide us to “where Not to go”.

They also define how corrupt the Politicians and their Senior Public Servants, the authoritative figures involved in this illegal policy and its killing, really are. And how Corrupt Dobbs really is. And her husband. They're the Experimentors that have not Stopped, but have decided to continue on knowing the killing and maiming and knowing their allegations concerning Seniors are Harming them, therefore prejudicing any research and finding concerning their Brain and Mind experiments.

My point is, lets be clear here, the Senior Experiment has been called a Cognitive Experiment, implying Psychology and it's management, Scientific Protocol, Codes of Ethics, and Protection, but what it really is, is just a Brain and Mind Experiment being done on Seniors, who have been told they have Psychological problems and need a Brain and Mind test. The proclamation that this is a Cognitive Experiment is just BBB from corrupt Experimentors doing things they shouldn't be doing. Trying to cover – up, with “Language”, but it's just more “hiding” of what they are doing.

My point is, lets not hide this BBB coming from the Dobbs', done to hide what they're really doing; running an Un – Sanctioned Human Experiment through the affiliation and sanctity of a University, Established Protocols, and the Trust of Government, which when asked for the proof of Bona fide (ness), S G Bond sarcastically and condescendingly chirped the Senior policy would be run with or without documentation; now that's accountability and responsibility.

My point is, these people are growing and thriving on the criminality and the knowledge of being so close to death and maiming it excites them, fulfilling some twisted perverted want.

My point is, they won't Stop by themselves, as they have a real taste for this corruption, deviant behaviour, and blood and guts. As explained above and with the below information concerning the following experiments and teaching lesson, someone else will need to Stop them.

*

Milgram, 1961, on obedience to authority figures, “measured the willingness of study participants to obey an authority figure who instructed them to perform acts that conflicted with their personal conscience.” (wikipedia, milgram experiment)(some subjects, believing they were legally electrocuting a person, as a punishment due to a proven deviant behaviour, gave enough electric shock to kill a person.)



Elliott, 1968, Blue eye/Brown eye Exercise, Elliott “exposes prejudice and bigotry for what it is, an irrational class system based upon arbitrary factors. Her teaching “exercise labels participants as inferior or superior based solely upon the color of their eyes and exposes them to the experience of being a minority.” (www. janeelliot.com)(this diversity training was also given to parents of the community, the prejudice expressed again, impacting the community in such a negative way that Elliott decided to move away; they didn't like what they turned into.) (This hate and violence is the same as Martin's attack upon me, as I exposed his prejudice and hate to himself and his peers and colleagues.)



Zimbardo, 1971, Stanford Prison experiment, volunteer student role playing, as prison guards and prisoners, “...the participants adapted to their roles well beyond what even Zimbardo himself expected, leading the “Officers” to display authoritarian measures and ultimately to subject some of the prisoners to torture. In turn, many of the prisoners developed passive attitudes and accepted physical abuse, and, at the request of the guards, readily inflicted punishment on other prisoners who attempted to stop it. The experiment even affected Zimbardo himself, who in his capacity as “Prison Superintendent,” lost sight of his role as psychologist and permitted the abuse to continue as though it were a real prison. Five of the prisoners were upset enough by the process to quit the experiment early, and the entire experiment was abruptly stopped after only six days”. (wikipedia)(they actually assaulted people like Martin assaulted me, like the illegal policy assaults me and denies me my Rights, Dignity, and Self – Respect.)

*

My point is, S G Bond, Dobbs, Martin, Howie, and their colleagues will not stop as those above did not stop until the Experimentors stopped their Experiment. I've been asking for ten years now for the diabetic policy, an Un – Sanctioned Human Experiment, to stop. They know it's illegal and kills and they still don't stop. They have also learned Society and it's Police are afraid of them, as it's gone on to long and the death rate is too horrific to acknowledge now, according to the Press and Police, so these monsters continue with their deviant behaviour killing hundreds of naïve bystanders a year and have now escalated their deviant behaviour against Seniors.

Questions, “And these people don't have Cognitive Problems?” and “These people aren't Nazis?”



Question, “What were the American troops caught doing with Iraq prisoners of war?”

Answer, “All the above and more.” and “Some say Canadians in Afghanistan and Canadian troops in Somalia did the same thing.” These were not managed experiments, but actions where the Code of Ethics of War and Canada and the USA were disregarded by the troops.

My point is, think Scale. The same kind of abuse, lies, assaults and attacks, denigration of character, stripping people of their Dignity, Human Rights, and Constitutional Rights that's happened to me, therefore all diabetics, therefore 3 200 000 diabetics in Canada. All that is happening to me and millions of Canadians, as this policy is National, and B C really collects the Killers and Traitors for some reason. Now add all the other medical conditions monitored by these Nazis, the psychopaths and sociopaths like Martin, Howie, Dobbs and their Gangster buddies.



My point is, what I have come to understand is that I'm involved in the same dysfunctional behaviour as the above Experiments, except this is not a Bona Fide, Sanctioned, official Experiment managed by a Governing Body and Code of Ethics, which defines this behaviour as absolute Corruption, not a bona fide experiment gone amuck.

And Reader, you're involved to; as you're now Witness.

But Hold it. Hold it. S G Bond, Martin, Howie, Dobbs, and their colleagues or supporters are bound by a Governing Body and its called the Charter of Rights and Freedoms and our “rule of law” and the “supremacy of God”. They are bound by a Code of Ethics and its called the Human Rights Act, which is older than our Constitution. They are bound by their Oaths of Office. All demands of Humanity and our Democracy consciously disregarded by these people.

My point is, and these people don't have mental health issues?”



My point is, this deviant behavior is again realized with what happened to Brian Sinclair, in Manitoba, what Chief McCaskill is Investigating, a very real working example of the above, where people are killed, maimed, have their lives endangered, and experience the prejudice brought forward through such examples as the blue eyed/ brown eyed lesson, by those in Power.

Reader, just replace the brown eyed student in Elliot's learning lesson, on Prejudice, with First Nations People, and you don't think this is not going on in the Sinclair Investigation of his Death? And like here, those in Manitoba, those in Power, are in denial of their Crimes and Crimes Against Humanity and are trying to “hide” it.

My point is, S G Bond, Martin, Howie, and Dobbs are doing the harming, they are inflicting the pain and suffering and they know it's Wrong. They're stripping me, raping me, of my Rights, Dignity, and Self – Respect and they know this.

Question, “They know they are Wrong and yet they haven't changed, and if they don't know this is Wrong, then why don't they?”

This brings Psychopath and Sociopath into this game of theirs, leading to Crimes Against Humanity.

My point is, Psychiatrists, Psychologists, and Sociologists need to Legally Study these people, while they're alive, as they've worked themselves to the Top of the Food Chain and are now praying on those Below.

*

Schizophrenia, Dementia, and Borderline Personality Disorder

Schizophrenia?

S G Bond, if your Nazi “academic researcher” and her staff have done their job and proved the disabled and diabetic drivers are such an unhealthy, unclean, diseased, and dangerous Class of Society, that they need Government management even though your policy kills a hundred or so naïve bystanders a year, the documents would have been presented to me and I wouldn't be here. These documents would be available for all to read, as they're supposed to be a seminal work concerning the disabled driver.

However, as Dobbs did not send me the Guide in 2010 we know she has no Pride or Honour in her work now. Not like she had when she researching before her involvement with the B C Government; or should we even give Dobbs this benefit of doubt? So, the values she presented in those years is gone or she would have sent me the Guide, especially after I had found 'four of four' of her presentations Wanting, just Noise, Un – Professional, and not Scholarly.

By default, she would need to prove her expertise with a fifth presentation, and yet she didn't send it to the person that's responsible for her present employment and humiliation. If Dobbs had any Pride, Honour, Professionalism, and Scholarship, Values she pushes in her Resume and Curriculum Vitae, she would have sent me the Guide. She didn't because its just Noise, Not Legitimate, Not Professional, and absolutely Not Bona Fide.

Again, the Standards of Science and Scholarship were not attended to in the Draft, Policy, and second Draft I Reviewed. They were not attended to in Dobbs' Presentation to the BCHRT. Nothing was presented to fulfill the demands of the Charter, the HR Code, and the MVA.

We know Dobbs has not fulfilled the very things she lists, as to what has made her.

We know Dobbs knows her behaviour is against the Law, Humanity, and Science. We know Dobbs knows the policy kills and maims, is Bigoted, Discriminatory, and Prejudicial and yet she continues on. As do S G Bond, Martin, Howie, and their colleagues of crime.

Dobbs has severe Mental Health issues to do what she done, and now we know her true age is not 42, but older, and older can bring changes to one's mind and Dobbs knows this.

Questions, “Is it Schizophrenia, does she hear voices, is she in and out of this world, is she thinking she's a real medical doctor, as she and the S G Office labels her?” and “Dobbs certainly is Dissolutioned concerning Right and Wrong, Good and Bad, as how else can her behaviour be explained?” and “ She's proved the World of Science and Scientific Method, the very things that made her, are now outside of her vision of herself, as how else can her behaviour be explained?” and “ How can she state with one hand, 'this is who I am, constructed through very rigorous standards of Science and Law', and then with the other hand, 'do the opposite' and believe it ok to do?” and “ Is she going to save Diabetics from the World of Diabetes and the Fear and Loathing, Hate, Discrimination, and Prejudice that accompanies that disease, by misleading the World that she's managing them?”.

My point is, the Hate, Discrimination, Bigotry, and Prejudice is coming from people like herself; this Prejudice is being institutionalized with the Policy she's defending and implementing.

My point is, “ Dobbs' behaviour “is” this dysfunctional, it is harmful to herself and the Public, which again begs the Question; “Have Martin and Howie seen this dysfunction, therefore manipulating Dobbs to do their bidding?”



Martin and Howie's behaviour informs us they are liars, thieves, bullies, bigots, traitors, and murders, therefore the manipulation of 'someone lost' is not beyond their thinking and actions, as it contrives a Scapegoat for their behaviour; they will blame Dobbs, as she paints herself as the world famous “academic researcher” and they were just following her.

Liars, thugs, and bullies do sit in the background and use the disabled for their own purposes. These people, S G Bond, Martin, Howie and their colleagues are using and abusing Dobbs, as they are abusing me and other people with disabilities.

Question, “Does Dobbs really believe the illegal Policy and DME really can do what it's alleged to be able to do?”

My point is, the DME is supposed to decrease an unknown difference in driver mishaps, supposedly caused by hypoglycemia, through an unproven medical examination, given once every five years, and the DME is not supposed to Harm and yet she knows the DME harms, she knows it really is responsible for the Overcrowding of Emerge Facilities where there is an inordinate number of unexplained deaths. Knowing this Dobbs carries on as if the above is not there, not in her face for review, not in her mind and not there to Cover – Up.



Dobbs knows I take care of myself better than any government Intervention is doing or will do. She knows she is bound to acknowledge and study the patient or client for care they themselves carry out or are involved in. She has not done this. She knows she is bound to study any Intervention for Harm, to see if the Intervention can do what it's alleged to be able to do; to stop if any Risk of Harm expresses itself. She hasn't done this. She knows that just one death is beyond any accepted Intervention concerning Medicine, and Science, and Sanctioned Human Experiments.

Questions, “Why hasn't Dobbs stopped?” and “Why hasn't she resigned knowing I've confronted and exposed her deviant behaviour?”

My point is, I make the point that Dobbs needed this job with Government for guaranteed income and pension, as Research is a tentative business financially, and in order to do so she would need to corrupt the Standards that made her and break the Law. However, as she points out in her Curriculum Vitae she lists contracts and renumeration, she enjoys telling everyone how much she makes. Dobbs must be very happy with making what she makes or why else include it in a very Public document for the World to read? So, as she makes this much money, which means she really doesn't need money, then why has she stayed on with the Government, knowing the policy is illegal, harms, and she's failed to justify the policy with four other presentations?

Answer, “There really is something mentally wrong with Dobbs.”

Question, “Why does she stay on knowing the killing and maiming continues on, everyday this illegal policy runs?”

Answer, “Dobbs knows I Deconstructed her previous four presentations, as lies and just noise, and yet she continues on, hearing she's Great and above Law and Humanity; not changing anything and expecting change; doesn't this define mental illness?

Question, “Isn't this what's accepted as having Mental Health issues?” and “Doing the same thing over, over, and over again and expecting something else will express?”

Questions, “For some unknown reason Dobbs has moved beyond what has made her, what is demanded of Science, the Laws of B C and Canada, and Humanity. These are no small events, or simple Rules and Regulations, that she is bound by, has written she knows of and practices, and yet where are they now?” and “What kind of world is she living in now?” and “When did she consciously give up all this?” and “Or was it conscious?” and “Did she consciously give up all this during her first review for the OSMV, in 2006, mentioned above, when she really discovered the policy was illegal and kills and maims, but there was a permanent job offered and pension, so she lied, decided to mislead, misinform, and misrepresent, steal and corrupt all that made her, knowing she was riding on her BA and PhD and an over done Curriculum Vitae to manipulate, and with the knowledge that so many people fear Science and Scholarship?”

My point is, Dobbs really is of two minds isn't she.

My point is, isn't this just what we need, what B C and Canada needs, a corrupted, Schizophrenic, “academic researcher”, that defends an illegal Social Policy that kills and maims, which doesn't bother her, as she's beyond understanding Empathy and Grief, Wrong and Right, Good and Bad, Homicide, and a Crime Against Humanity. Just great.

Question, “Reader, you don't think Solicitor General Bond, Martin, and Howie aren't abusing Dobbs?”

Question, “Reader, you don't think S G Bond, Martin, and Howie don't have mental health issues for doing what they're doing to me, diabetics, the disabled, and Dobbs?”

*



Dementia?

Dobbs studies Seniors, she studies seniors looking for Dementia, and Dementia does not only express to those over sixty – five, an age it seems we list as the beginning of our Senior years. Again, I don't know her age but she has stated she graduated with a BA (psychology) in 1992; maybe twenty two when graduating; born in 1970, so she's forty or so, according to her Curriculum Vitae, but know you know she's may be twenty or twenty – five years older when we acknowledge her Nursing Degree and years in the field. She's not very old to have a form of Dementia but not unheard of, as one in five Canadians will experience Mental Health issues. PhDs are beyond what happens to the mortals? Is this what she believes?

There seems to be over fifty kinds of dementia, which begs the question as to what has happened to her mind, as dementia does not only impact those she studies.

Question, “Is this anti – Social, anti – Democratic, anti – Scientific, anti – Humanitarian, illegal, unethical, immoral, irrational behaviour of Dobbs due to Dementia?”

Question, “Is Dobbs on medication?”

Questions, “Or is it some other mental health issue?” and “Or is it a hormonal issue due to menopause or some other glandular problem causing her conscious or unconscious disregard of the Scientific Standards, Laws, and Human Rights Laws that made her?” and “Is she on medication for these?” and “Is she on street drugs to cope with the deviant behaviour?” and “Is she on street drugs so there is no record of drug use, as she hid her Nursing record, my health care, and the Guide?”

According to her inflated Resume and Curriculum Vitae she presents herself as the researcher of researchers. Thirty two pages of a Curriculum Vitae proving an inflated image of self or a self that is so insecure about what she's doing she needs to put down every letter she's ever written to bolster her sad and “unfulfilled life”. This “unfulfilled life” is proven, as she's started lying, stealing, misleading, misinforming and misrepresenting to fulfill her life now.

Questions, “And she's studying Seniors, she's using her research in a hunt of Seniors, as people she's illegally pronounced as having mental health issues?” and “Dobbs has mental health issues and she's declaring and hunting those she declares as having mental health issues?” and “Are you kidding me?”

Question, “Dobbs Curriculum Vitae and work are good examples of an Obsessive Compulsive Disorder, which begs the question; “What drugs is she on?”

*

Borderline Personality Disorder?

Reader, all the above is why Martin and Howie had to go outside of B C to find someone to cover up their illegal acts, with illegal acts of a scholarly nature. They needed to go into Canada, and found Dobbs in Alberta, studying Seniors, dependent upon government grants, which isn't a very stable source of income or scientific study, which is/was her passion and aim of life. That's why Dobbs is a instructor – on – call, a substitute lecturer for the University of Alberta, she supplements her income and ego with this.

Question, “How many others were interviewed for the job she took?”

We need to discover who the Human Resources, or “job placement company” was that found Dobbs and interview all that applied for the job to discover what Martin and Howie wanted of them, why they decided not to take the job, and why Martin and Howie rejected them. This employment exercise is paid for by taxes, therefore open for investigation.

Question, “Don't forget, Martin and Howie have known for years the policy is illegal and kills, so they know about lies, liars, cowards, manipulation, unscrupulous colleagues, and the naïve bystander. So, again, did they see a broken Dobbs, someone looking for permanent employment, someone hiding her age, in love with her Curriculum Vitae, starry eyed for a pension, willing to give up the Standards that made her, for her name in lights, (writing policy for government)?”

Questions, “Again, did they see someone living in two worlds; the world of Science with laws and order and one beyond with no boundaries?” and “Someone, whom after their interview, decided that the World Standards of Science, Humanity, and the Laws of B C and Canada wouldn't apply to her if she worked for Government?” and “The Standards that made her wouldn't apply to her, as nothing had happened to her future employers, as the A G Office had protected them?”

My point is, Dobbs knew this from the Reviews of Science she contracted with the OMSV, mentioned above and through my Inquire and first BCHRT Discrimination Complaint; she knew her behaviour could be deviant and disorderly.

My point is, Dobbs had a taste of these people then. They were liars, thugs, bullies, traitors and murders and everyone was afraid of them. Now that's power isn't it. Imagine the power over life and death Dobbs felt, more power than studying Seniors on the brink of death. She could go to Emerge and watch the consequences of her new work. The surrealism of the Emerge, with its Spectacle of Life, of life and death, of dreams gone awry, and screams and tears of the survivors. Reader, you don't think Dobbs thought through all this? She made a conscious decision to travel this road of criminality and indifference to life.

Question, “Did this bring her back to her Nursing days?”

Question, “Are Dobbs and S G Bond, Martin, Howie, and their Gangster Buddies like Fire Starters, they go back to the scene, to watch their work, the flames, screams and cries, the harm and death, the plight of the Firemen and Firewomen?”

My point is, Fire Starters really are sick people, they are mentally disturbed, as are the one's I'm exposing.



Again, Dobbs trained herself, and the Scientific Method trained her to acknowledge and evaluate the Consequences of her actions.

Question, “Reader, you don't think Dobbs thought through all this?”

Question, “Did Martin and Howie discover someone broken, whom they could use as a Scapegoat?”

Question, “Can you hear them in an Investigation; 'She did it, we were just following the PhD.'”

My point is, Homicide and Crimes Against Humanity don't have Scapegoats anymore.

Questions, “Did Martin and Howie see Dobbs as a broken intellectual and scholar, Dementia settling in, and yet still on the pedestal of “Dr.”, that she had contrived, who now with the status of a Government “academic researcher”, would be beyond reproach?” and “Is this how they sold their Treason and Homicide?” and “Sold it to Dobbs with Promises of Fame and Grandeur?”

Reader, PhD candidates are always grilled and need to defend their research. This carries on with the work they do after their PhD. They need to defend their research all the time, as they are Scholars.

Questions, “So, why hasn't Dobbs defended her attack and assault upon diabetics and the lies she presented concerning this?” and “Why has she not presented her Guide to me?” and “Dobbs was legally obliged to, little lone morally and ethically to do so, as she's using her PhD as the expert, but also as a Professional and Scholar, as she took on the Scholarly Job of proving Government Policy is Needed and that the Consequences of the Intervention are also legal, so why didn't she complete the project; to allow me to evaluate her work?”

Question, “Does Dobbs see herself as the one that's going to save Society from the world of the disabled, no matter how destructive her behaviour is to herself and to the naïve bystanders that are killed by illegal policy she's hiding?”

Question, “Borderline Personality Disorder tries to explain deviant Personality changes, changes that do not make sense; changes that are not Little Events but Big Events. Changes that are beyond what a person was, had trained themselves to be and lived by, guided by and forced to comply with Laws and Order, and we're to believe Dobbs' changes are just Little events?”

Question, now we know Dobbs is not 42, but older, 60 – 65 or older, and her whole life's work guided by Standards of Science, work that supported her financially, morally, and ethically, made her and supported her through the demands of the PhD, which begs the question; “What has changed Dobbs to disassociate herself from all this?”

Question, “What about Dobbs' Oath of Office of do not kill, harm, lie, steal, threaten, mislead, misinform, misrepresent, etc, etc?”

*

Question, “Does Dobbs really think the Illegal, Immoral, Unethical, Non – Sanctioned Human Experiment her husband is running is legal?”

By default, as an “academic researcher”, she knows what needs to be done before such an Experiment can proceed, and what needs to be done while the Experiment is running.

Question, “And as she has not offered anything to justify her behaviour against the diabetic, what has she offered to justify the attack upon Seniors?”

Questions, “Is this Senior policy based upon her search concerning Seniors?” and “Is it really bona fide, peer reviewed research or is it just more “Stuff” she has made up?”

Questions, “The Public and Scientific community are supposed to believe Dobbs and her husband's attack upon Senior drivers is bona fide?” and “Why?” and “They should put their attack on hold until all is resolved and they know this, so why haven't they?”

My point is, once corrupted at her level, a conscious choice, always corrupted.

My point is, the personality disorder applies to all her actions, therefore her madness does transfer to the Senior Policy.

*

The illegal “DriveAble Assessment Policy” concerning Seniors

Honourable Solicitor General Bond, I'm sixty – two now, to some I'm a Senior, but most importantly, I'm a Canadian and I don't need to be quiet about what you and your Nazi researchers are doing.

The first death of a Senior caused by the stress and strain, whether the driver or their partner, is Genocide. You're hunting Seniors, a very specific, vulnerable minority Class of People in B C. There is no need to do what you are doing. And you, Martin, Howie, your Office, and your colleagues really have taken us, Canadians, to the Brink of Genocide.



I'm the Democrat here. S G Bond, you may have been a Democrat but you certainly are Not now. Those who don't follow the Charter, the Human Rights Code, the Motor Vehicle Act, and obey their Oath of Office are not Democrats, they're something else, and when they hunt people in our “democratic society”, harm and kill those around the hunted, kill those hunted, they're Nazis and I don't need to be quiet about them, their perversions, and their psychological mental health issues. Seniors do not have cognitive problems enough to justify your attack upon them, your staff do, those running the Policy, those in the OSMV, like Martin and Howie, and those implementing the illegal Un – Sanctioned, cognitive Human Experiment, which doesn't even have a Code of Ethics to stop harm, before it expresses.

Question, “S G Bond, are you going to force your liars, thieves, traitors, and murders, men and women of your Office to undergo your illegal, immoral, unethical, unsanctioned Human Experiment?” Of course not. And “ Are you going to force their parents to comply?”



S G Bond, you don't think you're hunting Seniors right now? You're stalking and hunting them with a perverted scientist (s), actually Bonnie Dobbs is is not bona fide Scientist and if she was, she gave that up when she stole Science from the Scientific Community and used it for things it was not researched for. Also, she has listed herself as an “academic researcher”, and a “Dr.”, but she's not a real medical doctor, as your staff also misleads and misinforms concerning this “Professional” designation. Scientists and Medical doctors do not Experiment on Humans or anything alive without having approval by a Governing Board of their peers, where a Code of Ethics has also been composed to stop harms before they express.

You have not fulfilled the demands of the Charter, the HR Code, or the MVA in order for you to select a very specific, vulnerable, Class of Society for Psychological testing, a Cognitive Human Experiment. This is what the German Nazis did and the Socialists of the USSR. What are you doing? Do you not have anything Sacred?

*

There is no such thing as a Small Human Experiment, therefore No Management and Code of Ethics

Reader, I do not know what Dobbs' husband's qualification (s) and designation is/are in the community or what designation he has within the Scientific community. But this Un – Sanctioned Cognitive Examination, an illegal Human Experiment, strips him from all credibility and standing in the Scientific Community and Public and he knows this.

He also knows what his wife did with the theft of research material and use, the breach of Affidavit, and mail fraud, so nothing he presents needs to be believed as bona fide or worthwhile; he supported his wife in her quest to get permanent employment with the Government, a pension, and her lust for power and prestige. For him to accept her behaviour as acceptable is Wrong, and by default this exemplifies his own Cognitive Problems, corruption, and breach from the Scientific and Academic community.

His 'computer toy' that he uses on Seniors today, to measure their Cognitive status, has not been proved as bona fide and none harmful, and yet he's implementing Intervention knowing this; he's trying to justify the computer toy as valid, with this attack upon Seniors Brains and Mind, knowing there are not previous bona fide sanctioned experiments.

Reader, we cannot believe anything these people are saying or doing.

My point is, we need to back up to what is really going on here. Dobbs' husbands' first Experiment would have been conducted to discover if there is a problem with Seniors.

Questions, “Has this been done or is it based upon his “view” of life, as the diabetic policy is based upon some very corrupt twisted, and perverted Senior Public Servants “view” of life?” and “As this Brain Experiment is based upon his “view” of life, is it because he also needs permanent and full – time employment, as his wife needs?” and “As his wife will do anything for Government employment, has he done the same?”

My point is, as someone running a Human Experiment he doesn't have a “view” of life; the discoveries coming from the First or Original Sanctioned Human Experiment concerning Seniors, proving whether or not Seniors have Cognitive Problems will offer a bona fide “view” to take or not. S G Bond did not state this original Human Experiment had been done, or the Non – Human Experiments had been done previous to the Human Experiment.

Question, “Dobbs' husband is saying his unproven “view” is the direction our “democratic society” should live by, and he's playing this out by Experimenting on Live Human Brains and Minds to prove what?”

My point is, what ever he's trying to prove it should have been proved before he was allowed to play and experiment on Seniors' Brains and Minds.

It just more BBB coming from some researcher running an Illegal Un – Sanctioned Human Experiment pretending he's above the “ . . . supremacy of God and the rule of law: . . . ”; the very things that make Canada and our Democracy.

Secondly, after this First or Original Experiment there would be an evaluation of the discoveries to see if there is a bona fide problem and that an Intervention is really needed. Then, if and only then, if a problem is discovered and an Intervention suggested, the Intervention is then examined, an Experiment is designed and run to see if the Intervention can really do what it's alleged to be able to do and that it does no Harm; run on Non – Humans first. All managed by a Governing Board and a Code of Ethics, and open to the Public for review.

Third, then, and only then, an Experiment would be run on Humans to see if the Intervention was practical, offer value and worth, could do what it's alleged to be able to do, and no Harm.

Fourth, then, if this Experiment offered Good and did not Harm, it could be used as Social Policy.

My point is, it could be used but may not be used, as it may be Unethical or Immoral to Humans to run.

My point is, there is another demand here, as it's Social Policy within the Democracy of Canada and involves Humans, this means the whole experiment would be evaluated again to see if it would be worthwhile to implement, compared to the demands of the Charter, Human Rights, and would it fulfill the demands of laws like the MVA, and not conflict with Oaths of Office. If it cannot fulfill the demands of all these Laws it cannot be done.

My point is, to the Dobbs', Solicitor General Bond, Martin, Howie and your corrupt colleagues, Practice the demands of Democracy or don't be involved. You people don't deserve Canada, you can't rise to the demands of Democracy, you're petty, small, corrupt people and always will be; that's why you're failures and Nazis.

*

Reader, this Cognitive Experiment on Seniors' Brains and Minds is the stage of proving if the Intervention can really do what it's alleged to be able to do and yet people are loosing their licenses due to the consequences of the Cognitive Study, the computer toy that has not been Experimented upon to see if it can do what it's alleged to be able to do, or even needed, or evaluated for Harm.

Questions for the Dobbs', S G Bond, Martin, Howie and their Gangster buddies; “Who's the Governing Body managing this Phase of the Experiment and where's the Code of Ethics?” and “Why is Dobbs recommending the suspension and cancellation of licenses when your computer toy has not been evaluated as to be able to do anything?” and “Where is the original Experiment that proves Government has proved a need for this policy against Seniors?” and “Have you fulfilled the demands of the Charter, the HR Code, and the MVA in order to continue on with running an Intervention that has not been proved to be needed or that the Intervention can be legally used to cancel a license?” and “Driving in Canada is a Privilege and not a Right, so why are you eliminating or cancelling license when you do not have the Right to cancel a Privilege, as you have not proved a problem nor have you proved the computer toy can measure the unproven problem, little lone proved you're not harming seniors Brains and Minds?”

The people running this Un – Sanctioned Cognitive Human Experiment are lying about what they're doing. They're Experimenting on the Human Brain and Mind and do not have the Legal Right or the Moral Right to do so. They're collecting data to see if the computer toy works, all the while pretending, lying, misleading, misinforming, that the Experiment is bona fide legal Social Policy, that has fulfilled the demands of the Charter, the HR Code, and the MVA.

And there should be no doubt that Dobbs is collecting data for a new article for her Curriculum Vitae and yet it's not a Sanctioned Human Experiment; and as she has mislead about who she is, mislead with stolen Science and Affidavit, she'll write it up as it is something legal, managed by a Governing Body and a Code of Ethics.

*

The Work Needed before Human Experiments

Hold it. Hold it. We're talking about Humans here. I know S G Bond, Martin, Howie, Dobbs, and their colleagues do not accept diabetics as Human and having Rights, but the disabled are Humans with Rights and Seniors are also Humans, with Rights.

We're talking about “Humans”.

My point is, we are not allowed to 'just Experiment on Humans', there are World Protocol for Human Experiments. These Protocol are for all people on this Planet and Dobbs, and her husband, S G Bond, Martin and Howie and their gangster buddies know this. These Protocol are enforced especially after the Nazis had there absolutely Mad years Experimenting on Jews, Gypsies, people they didn't like, “the Disabled” and the “Elderly”. These rules are for people like Dobbs, her husband, and S G Bond to keep them from where they have gone today, and they know it.

Solicitor General Bond should have put the Disabled Policy on hold until my Questions had been answered, not lied about what was happening with Martin and Howie illegal policies' and the illegal Human Experiment which forces G Ps and drivers to comply with the DME.

Solicitor General Bond should have presented the preliminary Experimental Purpose and Procedures that had been reviewed and accepted by a Governing Board and the agreed upon Code of Ethics for all to see. She offered nothing but a smart mouth, condescension, and sarcasm in response to MLA Simmons inquiry into the legality of her actions and Dobbs' husband's Brain and Mind Experiment.

My point is, before Human Experiments there will be animal Experiments. Ask the Animal Rights People about Experimental Process and Rules. Mice, rats, pigeons, or chimps or whatever animals bona fide psychologists, psychiatrists, and their Peers agree upon, but not Humans First. The animal experiments will also have gone through due process.

Question, “Where are the documents proving the animal experiments as bona fide and not harmful?”

These rules keep us from becoming Monsters and Nazis. That's why the people I'm confronting and exposing really are Nazis. I don't need to be quiet about these people.

The first Experiment concerning Dobbs husband's computer toy, the Intervention, would have been managed by a Governing Board and their Code of Ethics, which would have shown whether or not the idea of cognitive problems were sufficiently addressed.

All this is mandatory for Human Experiments.

Question, “Where are the preliminary Experiments the justify the Human Experiments?”

My point is, if Dobbs and her husband, S G Bond, Martin, Howie, and their co – conspirators state this is 'just a little Experiment', so all the Process, Procedures, and Protocol do not need to be fulfilled, tell them they're liars.

Question, ask them “If it's “just a little Human Experiment” why haven't you fulfilled all the little Process, Procedures, and Protocol?””

My point is, don't believe the lies coming from these people because they are liars, dishonest, and absolutely corrupt.

My point is, nothing is more important than the “little experiments”, as they really are the experiments that show who we really are and this has shown us who Dobbs, her husband, S G Bond, Martin, Howie and their unknown colleagues are; Monsters and Nazis.

*

All this then leads to more studies to prove an Intervention can do what it's alleged to be able to do, without Harm.

Question, “Where are these studies?”.

My point is, one (1) Study on a couple of Humans is not Good enough to begin running Cognitive Experiments, Brain and Mind Experiments, on the Public, and Dobbs and her husband know this. Animal studies are done before Humans; especially as this an Experiment on Humans' Brains and Minds. Where are the Animal Experiments that lead to little Human Experiments, as a little cohort would have been Experimented on before a Large cohort, which may lead to proven Intervention?

Question, “Where and who are the Humans that were Experimented upon with the first Experiments?”

Question, “Do they have Cognitive Problems for the stress and strains of being publicly denigrated as Seniors are being attacked and assaulted today; having their Dignity and Self – Respect crushed by Monsters and Nazis?”

My point is, we have a Right to know who they were to see if they were harmed.

We need to know this, as we know S G Bond, Martin, Howie, Dobbs, and their colleagues are corrupt and already harming Humans with their Illegal Disabled Policies. We know Martin personally attacked and assaulted me for telling the Truth about him and his colleagues, and they covered it up, therefore we know they will cover up any harm from past illegal or even legal Human Experiments.

Question, “We also know the above people say one thing with one hand and do something with the other. So, here they're pretending the Intervention, the computer toy, is bona fide, and they're actually canceling licenses. So, where are the Peer Reviewed papers that prove this, allowing Martin and Howie, through ICBC and the RCMP, to have the legal Right to suspend and cancel licenses?”

My point is, one must remember, with the other hand they really are collecting data about the Intervention, to see if it can do what it's alleged to be able to do, which means they're circumnavigating the needed, established, safety protocols for Human Experiments. They're playing this charade because they know how difficult it really is to earn Permission to run Human Experiments, especially when making inquiries about the Human Brain and Mind. Especially when making inquiries concerning a vulnerable Class of Humans, Seniors, and their Brains and Minds.

S G Bond has sloughed this off, shuffled any responsibility and accountability to the wind, as she has cognitive problems herself, as demonstrated by already covering – up illegal disabled policies, by not sending me a copy of the Guide, and by not guaranteeing the Original Human Experiments concerning Seniors' Brains and Minds would be available to the Press and Public.



Reader, Human Studies, Human Research, and Human Experiments are managed by Third Parties and a Code of Ethics. After the idea of a Human Experiment had been evaluated and animal Experiments performed something may have been discovered proving a Need, therefore an initial Process concerning Humans put forward and evaluated.

The first managed Human Experiment would have proved the idea as viable or not, by understanding how things worked, evaluated through encounters with the Code of Ethics, Procedures would have been tuned and dropped, discoveries found, Conclusions would have defined good and harm, leading the Experimenters to places where they could go and what not to do, and if the process really can do what it's alleged to be able to do, with Interventions offered. Then studies would be done to see if the Intervention could do what it's alleged to be able to do.

Questions, “None of this was done, which begs the questions; “What is really going on?” and “How corrupt are these Canadians to do this to Canada and Seniors?” and “Who are these people of Science to do this to non – Science people?”

My point is, the so called people of Science have the Cognitive problems, not the Senior Driver.

This makes us question Dobbs' involvement, as she studies Seniors and their Cognitive skills and abilities and the stress' and strains that impact them. And as we know she has no respect for the Scientific Community and World Standards of Research, as she used her scientific colleagues research for things not intended , to justify a foreign countries illegal social policy, which is known to kill and maim we need to ask;

Questions, “What is her involvement with this new illegal policy?” and “Why?”

Questions, we know Dobbs' husband is running an Un – Sanctioned illegal Human Experiment that is not based upon what was learned by publicly managed, controlled, legal Animal and Human Experiment(s), governed by World Rules and Regulations and a Code of Ethics, and fulfilling the demands of the Charter, the HR Code, and the MVA, so; “What's he really doing?” and “Why?”

There should no doubt Dobbs will be recording this Un – Sanctioned Human Experiment and used for further gain in the work place, to further her Curriculum Vitae, status, and prestige that she doesn't really have anymore,as she's a thief, liar, and corrupt.

Questions, “Do you think she'll record the deaths and maiming, and other harms such as cognitive harms and physical harms from heart attacks and strokes, etc coming from this arbitrary assault and attack upon Seniors?” and “Do you think she'll record this cognitive study, a cognitive Human Experiment, as illegal, not sanctioned by the Scientific community and not having a Code of Ethics to prove no harm?” and “Do you really believe Dobbs will record and tell the Truth concerning this Cognitive Human Experiment her husband is running; tell the Truth and have her husband loose his employment with Government?”

My point is, S G Bond, Dobbs, Martin, and Howie have not lost their jobs for corruption, lying, falsifying documents, falsifying legal documents, assault, bulling, misleading and misinforming, breaching their Oath of Office, running illegal policy making them traitors, and running a policy that is known to kill and maim making them what?

Question, “Do you really believe they will fire Dobbs' husband for running an illegal Un – Sanctioned Experiment?”

My point is, he's just part of the gang now. And Gang members don't turn on themselves unless threatened with years in prison.

*

“Matriarchal Mommas (Gang)

My point is, my First Review of all this, May 28, 2009, after the BCHRT buried this, was sent to the Government and others and I defined the Gangsters as the “Matriarchal Mommas (Gang), as most known players were women. Since then men have come and gone, but the Gang is still mostly women, so I think the label should stay. Most gangs are for and run by men, and they have token women, Girl Toys. Here we have women and they have a few Boy Toys, with Dobbs' husband and Martin being the token Boy Toys.

*

Dobbs and her husband chose this path to follow, as did Martin and Howie, no one forced them to break the law and their Oath of Office, which has seen hundreds of people killed and maimed due to their illegal behavior and illegal disabled driving policies. They chose to be within this corruption, chose to contrive and construct it, and believe the killing and maiming of a few Seniors is acceptable or they wouldn't be involved.

As with the illegal diabetic policy there is the Five Steps of Engagement they need to fulfill; Dobbs' husband's Cognitive study has not been proven as bona fide, his computer toy (the Intervention) has not been proven as bona fide, (to be able to do what he and his wife allege it to be able to do), they have not acknowledged the consequences of this Cognitive Experiment, as they are too horrific, and they have not proven any Good will come from this, and what are Seniors really doing considering their driving?

Question, “As the diabetic and disabled driver do not pay for the DME fee, why are Seniors forced to pay for an illegal Policy Examination?”

*

Cost of the illegal “DriveAble Assessment Policy”

Question, “As this Illegal Examination is demanded by Government, and the Senior is paying for this Examination, why is this so?”

Questions, “The illegal Driver's Medical Examination, DME, that is forced upon the Disabled Driver, is now paid for by Government, due to my BCHRT Discrimination Complaint, so why are Seniors forced to pay for this Examination, as it's not been proved as Necessary and offer Good?” and “Even if it is found necessary why are Senior's forced to pay?”

This is Discrimination against the Senior, to say the least, as the Government set the Precedent for payment schemes concerning Driver Examinations, as it volunteered to change who pays for the illegal DME. This means this Precedent setting change in fee payments should include All Driver Examinations; this means S G Bond, Martin, and Howie should have continued on with their previously established payment schemes concerning demands or illegal demands upon drivers.

My point is, all this is Cruel and Unusual Punishment for no proven need, it denigrates Seniors, turns them into a Pariah, and harms their Dignity and Self – Respect, which are actions which define a Crime Against Humanity. And with the first Senior killed through the stress' and strains of this policy it moves us, Canadians, into the World of Genocide, as Dobbs has studied Seniors and attacks them with the very things she knows will harm them.

Question, “Seniors need to pay for their own destruction of their Dignity and Self – Respect, their Brain and Mind and you don't think S G Bond, Martin, Howie, and Dobbs and her husband don't have mental health issues?”

*



Reader, 'Cognitive Experiments', as this is what the new Senior's Policy is labeled as, are not listed under our Universal Health Care System, as a bona fide demand upon the UHCS, which means Seniors need to pay for this cognitive experiment.

As the DME for the Disabled Driver is not listed as a bona fide demand upon the UHCS someone or something else needs to pay for the DME. Before my BCHRT Discrimination Complaint the Driver needed to pay, Aug 2006. After that time, through shuffling of taxes, the Solicitor General's Office reimburses the UHCS, who paid the G Ps for their administration of the DME; don't forget the DME really is part of another illegal Human Experiment.

Question, “Why should Seniors pay?”

It's the same Ministry and Government Department, with the same corrupt Senior Public Servants making illegal demands of another selected minority of the Public; Seniors this time, compared to the Disabled.

This illegal cognitive experiment is no different than the illegal experiments forced upon the Disabled that want to drive. As explained above, the Disabled Driver's Medical Examination really is a poorly contrived and poorly thought out and implemented, illegal Un – Sanctioned Human Experiment. It's presented as bona fide, as it collects data from real Doctors, to be used to support the illegal policy, which really is only a charade played out to mislead, misinform, and misrepresent that the Disabled Policy is legal and the collection of data from the Disabled is a bona fide Intervention coming from a bona fide, Sanctioned, Human Experiment that proves a need for the Policy and that the Intervention can do what it's alleged to be able to do; its all BBB.

My point is, the above is why the UHCS has never paid for the Disabled DME, and someone else needs to pay for using the UHCS resources, the G P. The Disabled needed to pay for it if they wanted to drive, but actually the whole fee may not be paid; only the first $75, as that's all my G P charged me, as he didn't believe in the DME and the charge was to pay for the administration and paper work; for most G Ps that $75 seems enough. This came from the OSMV offering to reimburse my DME fees, as part of the out of court BCHRT Discrimination Complaint of 2004 – 2006.

My point is, the standard fee was or is $150, but as this Doctor was practicing Civil Disobedience and challenging people like Martin and Howie it was decided to use my G Ps fee as the standard fee reimbursement.

My point is, don't believe Martin and Howie were doing Good with this, they were rubbing the Doctors nose in what he was exposing and challenging; they were harming the G Ps; a payback for standing up to them.

Questions, “You don't think Martin and Howie and their Gangster buddies don't have mental health issues?” and “Reader, how do you feel now that your taxes are used to pay for an illegal government policy that is known to kill and maim and it may kill and maime you or your kids or parents in Emerge or while waiting for surgery?”

My point is, no one needs to beholden to S G Bond, Martin, and Howie for this change in fee scheme or the amount.



It's a phoney Examination that has not been proved as needed by the Charter, the HR Code, the Motor Vehicle Act and or any bona fide medical demands. It only comes from some very sick individuals in the Auto Industry chasing after power, prestige, and status, or maybe they just Lust after and are fulfilled by their criminality, falsifying documents, breaking their Oath of Office, and the killing and maiming in Emerge; they like the blood and have a taste for it now and will not give it up, and that's why they falsified documents, lie, and assaulted me.

My point is, if the Policy was bona fide, as they really are saying they're examining the Mental Health of the Public, it would be paid by the Universal Health Care System. This means it's not a bona fide Examination, proved to be needed and offer Good, but some kind of a Human Experiment collecting data concerning Seniors to be used against them, and that's why the UHCS will not pay for it. That's Right. This is not a bona fide Intervention coming from a Bona Fide, Managed Sanctioned Human Experiment that has passed all the needed Rules and Regulations of Human Experiments in order for the UHCS to pay for it.

Question, as the DME is not legal and the Disabled do not pay for it why should the Senior, a very vulnerable minority within our Society, need to pay for this illegal policy and the lies that come with it?

My point is, this again exemplifies the corruption of Old Thinking, Group – Think of Wrong – Thinking, the Anti – Social, Anti – Democratic Discriminatory behaviour of the Premier, Solicitor General Bond, Martin, Howie and their colleagues.

Question, “Who gave Dobbs' husband the Right to attack seniors and make them pay for his phoney Examination?”

Question, “What kind of bona fide “Scientist” or “academic researcher” would be so callus and prejudicial, toward a vulnerable minority of a Democratic Society?”

Answer, “A failure of a Scientist looking for false prestige, status, and money, realized from attacking and assaulting the marginalized of our society exemplifies mental health issues.”

Answer, “A scientist that has no Morals and Ethics.”

Answer, “The Absolute failure of a Human trying to live off the very vulnerable of our society, people who cannot defend themselves and the so called Scientist knows this.”

Question, “And Dobbs' husband doesn't have Cognitive Problems himself?”

Question, “Why isn't Dobbs' husband doing research to make the World a better place, not just his bank account?”

Answer, “As proven by Dobbs, it seems Dobbs and her husband will do anything to make money.”

*

Nazis and research

Once again, people that run illegal Un – Sanctioned Human Experiments are Nazis and I don't have to be quiet about them. Nazis are allowed in Canada, as that's part of Democracy, but I don't need to be quiet about people like Dobbs' and her lies and theft and her husband's illegal Human Experiments, their Crimes Against Humanity.

Question; “As these Nazis are running an illegal Human Experiment, within my Democratic Canada, why is it that the Democrats in our Country need to pay for this illegal Nazi Human Experiment?”

Question, “As the UHCS will not pay for this Experiment, why is it that Seniors need to pay for an illegal Experiment, where a Private company is running it, is collecting data, which will in turn be used in an effort to justify the Policy and Intervention, in order to get permanent contracts, therefore permanent work for Government?”

Questions, “Why is Dobbs' husband, who's running an illegal Un – Sanctioned Human Experiment, subsidized by the Seniors who are forced to undergo the Experiment, allowed to do this?” and “Why isn't he paying for his own research?” and “If the Government really believes in this Senior Policy why isn't it using taxes to fund bona fide researcher instead of using the husband of their corrupt “academic researcher?” and “I imagine the last question answers itself, doesn't it?”

Answer, “As Dobbs has stolen, lied, and falsified documents for the B C Government why should be believe her husband won't do the same thing as he's already running an illegal Un – Sanctioned Human Experiment.”

Questions, “According to NDP MLA Simons' blog, the private company running these illegal Human Experiments is run by Dobbs' husband. So, why is he allowed to profit from a Crime Against Humanity?” and “With the first Senior or the partner or companion killed by this Senior Policy, the harm moves to Genocide.”

Question, “Gangsters and Murders are not allowed to benefit from a book or writings about their crimes, so why are Dobbs and her husband allowed to do so?”

*

Reimbursement of Senior Fees

Reader, let me set you up again.

My 2004 – 2006 Discrimination Complaint changed the DME fee payment scheme for the Disabled driver, who were forced to pay for the illegal and phoney DME. Our taxes, coming from the taxes allocated to the Solicitor General's Office now pay for the Disabled DME, although at first glance it seems the UHCS is paying. The UHCS pays the doctor but is reimbursed by the S G Office. S G Bond, Martin, Howie, Dobbs and her husband, know this. So, why do Seniors need to pay? It's called Discrimination, as the Government set the Precedent when they changed the fee policy in 2006.

S G Bond, Martin, Howie, and unknown supporters changed this in order to have me withdraw my BCHRT Discrimination Complaint.

My point is, Seniors should not need to go through a BCHRT Discrimination Complaint to have Equality and Inclusion for a Fee Payment Policy Martin and Howie established in 2006. The Government needs to pay for this illegal demand upon Senior Drivers, as it pays the illegal demand upon the Disabled Driver.

*

Secondly, every Senior that's paid for this illegal demand, the phoney illegal Human Cognitive Experiment, needs to be reimbursed the fee, as I was.

S G Bond, your corrupt Office, Martin, and Howie, also made another voluntary change to policy. They voluntarily Reimbursed my DME fees, as part of the Settlement Agreement you recently lied about when responding to my demand that you Resign due to your cowardice in not firing Martin who attacked and denigrated my character by falsifying documents to do so, and you having the knowledge that you're running an illegal policy that kills and maims.

I agreed to this Reimbursement, as part of the promises made to have me withdraw my Discrimination Complaint, which your office never fulfilled, as exemplified when Martin and Howie broke the Settlement Agreement and just recently by not sending me the phoney Guide that was due in late 2006, then early 2007, then in 2009; again, if it was bona fide they would have hand delivered it or sent it by registered mail.

My point is, when Government voluntarily changed the DME fee policy for all diabetics and disabilities, not just me, it set the example of Inclusion and Equality for all Disabled; people benefited, were involved, even though they did not know the 'what' and 'why' of the change in Fee Payment.

When I discovered the Solicitor General's Office did not Reimburse All diabetic drivers and the disabled their fees, as was done for me, I ask Martin and Howie why they did not reimburse all disabled drivers, as they reimbursed my fees; something I did not instigate.

They refused to answer and it was only when I lodged my second BCHRT Discrimination complaint did they respond through counsel. I lodged a Representative Discrimination complaint concerning this and the BCHRT Decision is online; BCHRT Decision 445, 05 December, 2008.

There was/is no bona fide reason for the BCHRT to not find this difference in treatment not worth hearing, that those actions are not Discriminatory, as the Government instigated the Fee payment change and the Reimbursement to me; S G Bond, your Office, Martin, and Howie set the precedent, which should have logically continued on to all diabetics and disabled drivers as you volunteered to pay for the DME fee to All, you should have Reimbursed to All.

My point is, an argument put forward to dismiss my Complaint was that the Government would have a difficult time contacting all those concerned; it's a phoney argument, another Circle Argument the BCHRT supported for Government. I mentioned the standard contact instruments; newspaper, TV, radio, unions, BCAA, and the new contacts such as internet, Facebook, and Twitter. These were acknowledged but what was not acknowledged is that Government runs the DME with computers and the Disable Driver is contacted through a automatic mailing list, which means everyone is there by the push of a button.

My point is, the disabled are in the Computers for ever, until they die, and everyone knows, once in a Government computer system you never get out.

Question, “Why wasn't this acknowledged as the “way” to contact the disabled as that's how the Government contacts the disabled?”

S G Bond, your office must have threatened the BCHRT, as was done with my third Discrimination complaint, (where you presented stolen research in a Affidavit and nothing was said about this).

My point is, the cost of this Reimbursement may have cost the Government $100 000 000 or more, which would have had the Legislature Opposition and those that follow Government spending to ask questions.

My point is, Reimbursement of fees for an illegal policy may have brought my Discrimination complaints forward and exposed the illegality and its killing and maiming.

My point is, S G Bond, everyone reading this letter, and the World, should know this about your Office and Martin and Howie and how they Discriminated against the Disabled and screwed them out of their Reimbursements for their DME fees. The Disabled are a vulnerable and marginalized Class of our “democratic society”, as are Seniors, and they deserve better treatment.

*

Third, BCHRT Decisions acknowledge the vulnerability of the disabled, about how the disabled are marginalized by actions not acceptable, as these same actions are in turn not applied to the non – disabled.

Question, “So, why did the BCHRT, within the Representative Discrimination complaint not support an investigation into why the disabled drivers were not reimbursed their DME fees?”

Question, “ Who were they to go against the established policy of the BCHRT?”

Question, “What influenced the BCHRT staff, whom evaluated my Representative Discrimination complaint, concerning this Reimbursement, to hide or not abide by acknowledged BCHRT policy of not marginalizing the disabled?”

*

Not only are these people I'm exposing running illegal policy against the disabled, they have screwed them out of their money. S G Bond, Martin, Howie and their supporters really are the Monsters of our “democratic society”.

Question, “What kind of people screw the disabled out of their money?”

Answer, “Monsters”.

My point is, this is not an online or telephone scam but Government making precedent setting policy for one and not giving it to others. Done because the other disabled don't know about it and the BCHRT covered it up. I was told to go to the Supreme Court of B C if I didn't like the BCHRT decision concerning this. This behaviour, telling me to go to the Supreme Court, is the old lie and bullying tactic to protect the guilty.

The guilty know that I or the average Canadian does not have a million dollars a year to take on Government, the Attorney Generals' Office, and the private lawyers they hire to fight the Public, as exemplified with the corruption surrounding the sale of BC Rail; eight years in court at a million a year, per accused, and those found guilty only declared so after the Premier of the day resigned.

I had a good laugh about the BCHRT not finding my questions concerning this new discrimination, the failure of Reimbursement, as not being valid and worthwhile to investigate.

Question, “S G Bond, I wondered what your office threatened the BCHRT with for them to 'coward up' like they did?”

Questions, “Did Martin attack those women in the BCHRT, as he attacked me?” and “Was their funding threatened, to be withdrawn if they did not bury this Representative Discrimination Complaint?”

My point is, I laughed as your actions again exemplified how corrupt the S G Office, Martin, and Howie are. I couldn't contrive a better example to add to the list of corruption coming from cowardly, incompetent, and corrupt politicians, such as yourself and absolutely corrupt Senior Public Servants, such as Martin and Howie.

Solicitor General Bond, you need to reimburse the Disabled you screwed out of their Reimbursements. S G Bond, you need to reimburse All Seniors that have paid for this illegal Human Experiment. You are not allowed to screw them, as you screwed the disabled out of their reimbursements for illegal disabled driving policy.

*

Threats?

S G Bond I have not found any bona fide science or documentation proving a need for this policy against Senior drivers and have not discovered anything that proves your Office and the OSMV have fulfilled the demands of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, Sections 1, the demands of the Human Rights Code, Section 8, and fulfilled the demands of the Motor Vehicle Act, Sections 25 and 29, which means they have not fulfilled their Oaths of Office either.

Question, “Who threatened you Bond?”

You feign ignorance concerning the illegal disabled policy, the diabetic policy, the breached Crown Settlement Agreement, which is a Breach of your Oath of Office. You know of the harm from the illegal policies, the killing and maiming of the naïve bystander, the assault upon the Dignity and Self – Respect of a Class of People, but you have gone to University, so we know you can read and write, which means you are knowingly involved in a Crime Against Humanity.

Questions, “S G Bond, you do not see this attack upon Seniors as leading us to Genocide; attacking a vulnerable minority for no Good or Bona Fide reason?” and “You've chosen to say nothing and do nothing to stop it, which means you believe this is acceptable?”

Question, “Your contrived ignorance and naïvety toward this is not acceptable anywhere in the World now. So, who threatened you?”

*

Reader, it should be remembered that according to Simons' blogs, Bonnie Dobbs is the founder of DriveAble Assessment Centre, which produced the Guide for the OSMV, which begs the Questions;

“What Science and other materials did she steal to justify the Guide?” and “Did she again breach Affidavits concerning this?” and “Did she inform the owners of the Science of the Consequences of the policy upon its subjects or clients and naïve bystanders in Emerge and those waiting for surgery?” and “Did Dobbs inform the owners of how many naïve bystanders the illegal policy has killed and maimed during the past ten years I've been inquiring about this illegal policy?” and “Did she inform them she stole their research previously?” and “Did she inform them the policy has not proven any Good even though its been running since 1996; this is the last time the DME was renewed so we know it's been running illegally since then?” and “Did she inform them that the Government cannot and will not acknowledge diabetics and the disabled already visit their doctors for care, which makes the policy redundant, unnecessary, pointless, purposeless, which means the policy is based upon Hate, Discrimination, Bigotry, and Prejudice, not Scientifically proven findings?” and “That the Government screwed the disabled out of their reimbursement of fees?” and “Did Dobbs inform the owners the research that her first four attempts to legally justify the diabetic policy were withdrawn due to my Deconstruction of them, exposing her failure to fulfill Standards of Scientific Inquiry and the Scientific Method?” (This is important as owners of research have the Right to know “Intent of Use” and four un – professional, un – scientific attempts by a corrupt colleague will demands questions from the owners of the research.) and “Has Dobbs informed the owners of the Research their Science is being used to justify a Crime Against Humanity?” (As with a bona fide experiments leading to an Intervention, the consequences of the Intervention must be acknowledged.)

This means Owners of documents protected by Copyright, Intellectual Property Rights and Intent of Use Protection instruments need to know the above in order to question what Dobbs has done in an effort to justify the illegal policy against the Diabetic and the Disabled.

Secondly, all this means Owners of documents protected by Copyright, Intellectual Property Rights and Intent of Use Protection instruments need to know and question what Dobbs has done in an effort to justify the illegal policy against the

Seniors.

Third, the owners of research also need to know the illegal Human Experiment Dobbs' husband is running against Seniors will have Dobbs,the thief and liar, collecting data. That the same Government people she stole their Science for, are the same people now forcing an illegal policy upon Seniors and making them pay for the Un – Sanctioned Cognitive Experiment. And that the first senior killed by this illegal policy is Genocide.

Question, “Reader, do you think Dobbs informed the owners of the Research what the Consequences of the Disabled Policy really are?”

Question, “Reader, do you think Dobbs informed the owners of the Research what the “Intent of Use” really is?”

My point is, even if material used by Dobbs is not Protected the owners or estates have a Right to know if Dobbs has used their material. Bona fide Scientists and “academic researchers” do this, they are not afraid to stand up and inform the World what they are really doing. Of course we know Dobbs is a thief and liar, which means she has not done the above and that's why every thing Dobbs and her husband do must be Deconstructed for the lies, misinformation, and misrepresentation that the work will be. Every owner of Research needs to be contacted and given a copy of this and my letter to the Ombudsman, mentioned in “Those contacted and why”.

My point is, everyone involved in this auto industry, transportation industry, illegal policies, illegal Un – Sanctioned Human Experiments have a Right to know what some very perverted, sadistic, psychopathic, sociopathic, incompetent, cowardly, corrupt Politicians and absolutely corrupt Senior Public Servants are doing to the Public in B C and Canada.

*

Solicitor General Bond's Lies about Licensing; “Seniors' Brink of Genocide”

Honourable Solicitor General Bond, let me be very clear here. The first senior killed by this illegal policy is Genocide.

It's Genocide as your office, YOU, Martin, and Howie and some unknowns have Selected a Very Specific Minority and Vulnerable Class of People for attack. It 's an attack as you have not justified the Senior Policy and you know the harm it can do.

My point is, Dobbs studies Seniors and knows how to harm Seniors. One denigrates their character with unproven statements, alienating the Class of People, Humiliating them, stripping them of their Dignity and Self – Respect. Just as you have lied and contrived your attack against the diabetic and disabled you now do the same to Seniors.

From Nicholas Simons, MLA, NDP, who has a Criminology degree from the University of Ottawa and Master's in Criminology from Simon Fraser University;

“Studies show that the loss of a drivers license leads to depression, social isolation, and early admission to nursing homes.”



Question, “Do you really believe depression and loss of Health begins with the loss of license?”

Answer, “It doesn't. It begins with being targeted, being hunted with unproven statements, alienating a vulnerable, minority, Class of People, Humiliating them, stripping them of their Dignity and Self – Respect, where the threat of loosing one's license for no good reason comes into being, done with arbitrary statements, by some very corrupt people that do not explain themselves with bona fide facts, just contrived, harmful, deceitful accusations coming from so called Trusted positions of Politicians and Senior Public Servants.

It continues with the denigration of the Senior for no bona fide reason, in the Public Space, by those in Power, where the Senior cannot compete. This Public humiliation was done with purpose; denigrate the Senior so the Public begins to believe the Senior is a menace to society and needs controlling, as the disabled do.

My point is, this is just more Hate, Prejudice, and Discrimination coming from S G Bond, Martin, Howie, and their supporters, their Gangster buddies.

My point is, Seniors do not know, the Public does not know, who the Senior Public Servants are who are attacking them, and this done with purpose, to establish the unknown, as the unknown grows fear. That's stressful to say the least. The stress and strain of Not knowing your enemy can kill the Senior and Dobbs knows this.

The early threats express themselves through such statements, from the unknown Senior Public Servants, that Unexplained Instruments, an un – Proven, un – Scientific, un – Proven Medical, non – Proven Psychological Computer Toy from Dobbs' husband, will be used to prove Seniors' Brains and Minds don't work, and yet their Brains and Minds have not been found or proven to not be working.

Question, “As with the diabetic driver how does a diabetic prove they are not a menace to the Public, if nothing has been proven, offered to prove they are a menace?”

My point is, this is just another example of the insane circle argument used by insane people like Martin and Howie to justify their insane behaviour.

Another example of this insane thinking and behaviour of Martin and Howie's is when I was told I would need to appear in front of an Evaluation Board to see if I had changed my Behaviour making me a better person; therefore a better driver. This meant I was to stop demanding my Charter Rights, Human Rights, and Rights I have under the Motor Vehicle Act; I wrote the Board and stated I would not do this.

Secondly, as this was a power trip of Martin's, as he falsified documents to do this to me, this also brought the Male world of sexual harassment into his behaviour, he was informing he was the Boss, the Big Dog, and I would need to kiss his ass, just like some dog in the pack. He was telling me that I would need to kiss his ass to get my license back; I wrote the Board and stated I would not kiss his ass, perform fellatio, or bend over his desk to be sodomized by Martin.

My point is, this attack upon Seniors is coming from the same person that attacked me through a hands off affair by illegal policy and accusations, and through the Press, and when I kept demanding my Rights, Martin's behaviour changed to a Personal Attack and Seniors should be aware of this and how to defend themselves.

My point is, S G Bond, Martin, Howie, and their colleagues attacked Seniors with no warnings, as that is how they establish their enemy as the Pariah, though lies and unproven accusations, which the Senior can never erase from the Public's Brain and Mind. Dobbs has a BA psychology and a PhD and knows this.

My point is, this is part of their game of Gangsterism, of the Non – Democrat, the Fascist and Nazi, attack the disabled and the marginalized of society to fulfill whatever perverted lust they have that needs to be fulfilled, through Hate Crimes, and to keep and grow their jobs by contriving problems that allows them to find others such as themselves, as they found Dobbs and now they've found her husband and those clinging to his side for twisted status and prestige coming from illegal and perverted Science.



The harassment continues with the threat of the Scientists using unknown and unfamiliar instruments, cars, for road tests. These stress' and strains are known to cause harm. These unknowns are proven harms, as Dobbs knows this, as she studies Seniors and she knows the Failing points of Seniors. And her husband is running this Un – Sanctioned, illegal, immoral, unethical Human Experiment, she knows how to contrive stress and strain and what to test to make it seem as if their Mind or Brain Experiment is working and valid. Dobbs knows the harms of impact so they design to the experiment to prove the known, something they have grown, not the other way around. Once again the government is doing one thing with one hand and doing the opposite with the other, manipulating all involved.



Question, “The loss of a Seniors' driving license is caused by what?”

Answer, “Just more lies and threats, as Martin did to me.”

The process begins with Government lying about Seniors and what they really are doing. It's based upon some Senior Public Servants' “view” of life. An illegal and corrupt point of “view” of life, as exemplified with the diabetic and disabled drivers' policies and all I've documented above.

Questions, “Is the designation of “problem driver”, a Senior with Brain and Mind problems, a Senior flagged for Brain and Mind Research and Examination, based upon the number of “driver mishaps, tickets, or going too slow”?” and “Are the driver mishaps compared to other driver mishap rates or are they, as they should be, compared to the supposed difference between Senior driver mishaps rates and non – Senior drivers?

My point is, this is what the diabetic policy is about, a supposedly difference in driver mishap rates. It is not that diabetic drivers do not have driver mishaps.

My point is, this is not about whether Seniors have driver mishaps but that there is a proven difference in driver mishaps between Seniors and non – Senior drivers. Enough to have S G Bond, Martin and Howie declare them a menace to Society and have some Nazis academic researchers Experiment on their Brains and Minds.

Question, “Are the criteria for Brain and Mind Experiments the same for every other Age Class of driver?”

Answer, if I understand what has “Not been said”, this Senior Age Group is compared to all other Age Groups as a whole. What I mean is, I'm compared to non – diabetic drivers; all ages of type 2s and all ages of non – type 2s. But we're talking about Seniors, just an age group that has not been defined. And to have a comparison for bona fide (ness), to understand if there is a difference in driver mishaps S G Bond, Martin, and Howie need to inform the Public and Seniors what the comparison is.

Question, “What are seniors being compared to?”



My point is, for S G Bond, Martin, Howie to force this upon Seniors and the Public without defining these age categories is another constructed lie to Harm the Senior, to lay false accusations against the Seniors, as no one knows what comparison

S G Bond, Martin, and Howie have studied to prove a difference in driver mishaps.

Question, “Is this Senior Age Group from 65 – 75?”

The first ten years of the Senior Years. I'm a Senior, being 62, collecting Canada Pension, but this group is not what's being targeted. 75 – 85? As most of us die within this age.

Question, “Is this ten year span then compared to all other Driving Age Groups as a whole; 16 – 74?”

Answer, “It is.” I haven't read it isn't. I haven't read that S G Bond, Martin, Howie, Dobbs, and her husband, who's testing his Brain and Mind computer toy on Seniors have defined the age Group they are comparing Seniors to proving a difference in driver mishaps.

Important; my point is, this age group, for comparison to seniors with Brain and Mind problems is not acknowledged and defined, as that would be an acknowledgment that all of us have Brain and Mind problems. This is problematic isn't it, as Martin and Howie need to compare Senior Brain and Mind problems with non – Seniors with Brain and Mind problems for a bona fide comparison to learn the difference in driver mishaps.

This problem is not acknowledged, as the those in the Solicitor General's Office and the OSMV will be exposed for their Insanity of doing something like this, their Discrimination and Corruption, their Group – Think of Wrong – Thinking, as then they would be acknowledging that the remaining Public, those non – Seniors, also have Brain and Mind problems, but not at the level of the undeclared Age Group of Seniors they're attacking.

My point is, this conscious non – declaration of Age Groups is falsifying data, averages, and comparisons, lying and misinforming the Public, which defines Discrimination and Corruption. This exemplifies the fact that S G Bond, Martin, Howie, and Dobbs are targeting and hunting Seniors for no bona fide reason. They really are selecting a Minority, a very Vulnerable Class of Society to track, hunt, and attack with an unproven Cognitive or Psychological Experiment; a Brain and Mind Experiment.

My point is, for Government to state Publicly that Seniors have Brain and Mind problems, but never Expertly prove this, is an act that denigrates Seniors' Dignity and Self – Respect beyond any reasonable conversation about anyone.

My point is, that's why this illegal attack upon Seniors is a Crime Against Humanity; lies, very defined selection of a vulnerable minority, denigration of Dignity and Self – Respect, forfeiture of Charter Rights, Human Rights, and even Rights under the Motor Vehicle Act, and illegal Un – Sanctioned Human Experiments; all done by an “academic researcher” who presents herself as the Expert in Seniors behaviour and really does know how to harm them, which she has chosen to do.

*

My point is, “Age” is a factor in Insurance. 16 – 25 year olds pay more due to the driver mishap rate. I, as a type 2 diabetic, do not pay more than any other driver, as there is no proof type 2s have a higher driver mishap rate than non – diabetic drivers. That's right, people like S G Bond, Martin, Howie, and Dobbs do not inform the Public this, as it exposes their corrupt behaviour, their bias, disgust, contempt, discrimination, hate, and prejudice.

Question, “What's the 16 – 25 year old “driver mishap rate, ticket rate, and driving to slow rate” compared to the age of Seniors being targeted?”

All the Age Groups, in ten year increments, need to be listed as to driver mishaps and compared. You know as well as I do that the younger driver 'driver mishap rate' is greater than any ten years age Group.

Question, “Why aren't 16 – 25 year old drivers being attacked, for having Cognitive or Psychological Problems or Brain and Mind Problems, as Seniors are?”

These years may be the greatest growth time of our Brain and Mind, which is put forward to explain the 'why' of so much erratic, deviant, and exploratory behaviour during our teen and early adult years. In other words, these years may be the real years of Brain and Mind issues.

Question, “Do you think parents would allow these Nazis to run an Un – Sanctioned Brain and Mind Experiment upon their children?”

We need to see the “driver mishap rates, tickets, and slow driving rates” of 16 – 25 year olds for comparison to Seniors.

My point is, teens and early adults also get tickets and drive slow, as some 16 – 25 year olds have Brain and Mind problems, or hormonal issues, or differences in the Space – Time management, which causes them to speed.

Secondly, we also know they drive slow, as the cops say they smoke an inordinate amount of pot, or B C Bud, therefore slow driving is expressed.

Question, “Do ICBC or insurance company facts concerning the difference in driver mishap prove a need for an illegal policy against Seniors?”

Questions, “Do ICBC facts really prove a higher rate of driver mishap between what ever the Senior Age Group being targeted or hunted, compared to other Age Groups?” and “Is each Age Group evaluated with the same criteria?” and “Or is this a special criteria of Seniors?” and “Why the Discrimination in criteria?”

*

Closing Review

Questions, “Where's my copy of the Guide?” and “Why did you hide it?” and “How many people do you think your illegal policy has killed in Emerge in the past two years, where the Policy should have been put on hold, until I had the opportunity to Deconstruct it and lodge another BCHRT Discrimination Complaint?” and “Why didn't you put this policy on hold until you had fulfilled the demands of the Charter, the HR Code and the MVA, deliberately saving lives?”

*

S G Bond, we know this Senior policy harms, as your so called “academic researcher”, Dobbs, studies Seniors, completed her university degree studying Seniors, worked in the field collecting data and learning what harms Seniors, what leads to depression, social isolation, and early admission to nursing homes, as mentioned by Simons above. Dobbs knows what the impact of stress, the unknown, and arbitrary decisions against Seniors does to Seniors. What name calling and bullying does to Seniors. The very things You, Solicitor General Bond, Martin, Howie, Dobbs, her husband, and your supporters are attacking Seniors with.

S G Bond, I know your plan. You have a plan, it's the plan of Discrimination, Bigotry, and Prejudice; you Denigrate the vulnerable enough and people start to believe your lies, just as Martin denigrated my character with lies.

Question, “Here he is again and Martin doesn't have severe mental health issues?”

My point is, for your Office Staff to do what they're doing to not only the Disabled but now Seniors proves they have deep seated Cognitive problems. They and you use Group – Think of Wrong – Thinking to support each other. You Exemplify the bullies and brutes in the Social Psychological Experiments and teaching lesson mentioned above. S G Bond, you and your staff have the cognitive problems, not Seniors.

Whom ever Dobbs' husband is, he knows all this by default, as he's married to Dobbs, the “academic researcher”, so he knows all this and he knows she stole Science, falsified an Affidavit, engaged in Mail fraud, and misinformed readers with her Human Rights Presentation and mislead the BCHRT with her presentation.

Question, “Dobbs' husband is running a psychological Experiment, so we're to believe he's a psychologist or psychiatrist, following All the Rules and Regulation, and he doesn't know he's running an Un – Sanctioned Human Experiment?

Answer, “Bullshit.”

He knows and has chosen to do so, as his wife has chosen to not fulfill the Rules and Regulations that made her. So, we must assume this other half of the marriage has done the same, as one cannot live with an academic researcher, and be involved in her business and policy making, if one does not agree with her position; one of corrupting the laws of Canada and British Columbia and corruption of World Standards of Science Inquiry and the Scientific Method, all for profit and pension.

One also needs to understand this DriveAble policy against Seniors really is a Human Experiment as they are testing Seniors cognitive abilities and skills and their actions and computer toy has not been proved to be able to do what they say it can do. They'll covertly collect data in an effort to justify the policy for the future. Bona fide and harmless Science is the other way around.

Their plan is to lie about the Policy being legal, therefore the Experiment legal, where Dobbs is just now collecting data in an effort to prove some unproven problem with Seniors Brains and Minds.

*

S G Bond, you're from rural Canada, but you're not ignorant of the World, you also have post high school education, “an arts and science diploma ... and was working on a Bachelor of Arts degree in political science at the University of Northern BC.” (www .eventscreators.com) Your online resume states you worked with children and Christian groups, both guided by Morals and Ethics; you used these Values to establish yourself as a Trusted Politician. Where are those Values, Morals, and Ethics now? Where's your Ten Commandments now? (honor your mother and father, (Seniors), do not lie, kill, steal, and do not bear false witness?) According to this you're not even a Weekend Christian.

No, Honourable Solicitor General Bond, you are not some naïve bystander. You, by default, know what Genocide is and how it takes place. It creeps into society through illegal policy such as your diabetic and disabled policies, policy against the disabled and vulnerable, through people like you Bond, Martin, Howie and other ignorant, corrupt, and cowardly Politicians and absolutely corrupt Senior Public Servants such as Martin and Howie not obeying the country's Constitution and Charter Rights, Human Rights, and local laws such as the Motor Vehicle Act, and your Oath of Office.

Solicitor General Bond, you do not have the Right to continue with illegal policy, Un – Sanctioned Human Experiments, Crimes Against Humanity, and take us to the Brink of Genocide and that's what you've done.

Question, “What are you going to do when the killing begins Dis – Honourable S G Bond?”

Don't forget, even if the Liberals loose the next election and you disappear, those involved in Homicide, Crimes Against Humanity, and Genocide will be sought for ever. The difference is, those hunting You, Martin, Howie, Dobbs and her husband, and your supporters will be Bona Fide Hunters, Morally, Ethically, and Legally Sanctioned Hunters.

S G Bond, I'll try and find address' for those mentioned in “eventscreators.com” to see what they think of you now, as well as the Press in your Riding, as they may want to investigate this themselves. They should know what you're really doing and how that impacts them, health care, and seniors in your Riding.



*

OSMV Policy Cancellations

Reader, Mandatory Car Inspections were cancelled years ago, as over time they proved not to be needed., they really did not do anything.

Secondly, a few years ago, Camera Surveillance at intersections were stopped, as they were not proved to be legal, as whom ever dreamed up this police state policy and installed them did not fulfill the demands of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, before spying on the Public.

Third, Pollution Inspection of autos in the Lower Mainland, AirCare, was recently cancelled as it was determined there was no need for it anymore.

Fourth, just recently, within the past year, Listening Devices, surveillance devices, were installed at border crossing to spy upon the Public, as they waited in auto line ups at border crossings. This policy was stopped, as it was not proved to be legal, as whom ever dreamed up this police state policy and installed them did not fulfill the demands of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms and abused Free Speech, before spying on the Public.



My point is, and Question, “The disabled policy has not been legally justified by the Charter, the HR Code, or even the demands of the Motor Vehicle Act, so why is it running?”

Secondly, “Why has S G Bond, Martin, Howie, and their colleagues run a policy that is known to be illegal, and kill and maime?”

Third, “Why have S G Bond, Martin, and Howie lied, stolen documents, falsified documents, threatened people, attacked and assaulted me for an illegal policy that has never been proved as needed and never proved to offer any Good?”

Fourth, “Why have they breached their Oath of Office to attack the disabled and diabetic?”

My point is, this Disabled Policy is driven by Bias, Ignorance, Fear and Loathing, Contempt, Disgust, Hate, Discrimination, and Prejudice, not through bona fide Science and the fulfillment of the demands of our Charter, Human Rights Code, and the demands of the Motor Vehicle Act.

And now they're attacking Seniors with the same perverted twisted Group – Think of Wrong – Thinking.

I never need to be quiet about these people and their actions.

*

Satiation

Questions, “Reader, what satiates these people?” and “What satisfies, fulfills, or gratifies these people?”

Question, “What fulfills their working lives, and life after work?”

Answer, “Not the freely given power, status, and prestige of their job, if they do it properly; they've abused this, therefore it's lost to them.”

Secondly, “They are not doing Good for Society; they corrupt the Standards of Society and kill and maime Society.”

Third, “They are paid well and have extremely good pensions; so money doesn't satiate them.”

Fourth, “They have not fulfilled the demands of the Charter, the Human Rights Code, and the umbrella of the Motor Vehicle Act that they work under; they do not work for Democracy.”

Fifth, “The Trust of the Social Contract has been broken; they care nothing for the Society that affords them life.”

Sixth, “They've broken the Trust between Government and the Public, between Senior Public Servants and the Public.”

Seven, “They are not working for Humanity, to make the World a better place.”



My point is, they use their positions in Society to pretend, to fake, to deceive, to misrepresent that they're doing bona fide Government work, but with the other hand they play their Game of Horror, the Ultimate Game of Life, the Game of who lives and who doesn't, the game of killing and maiming.

Question, “Do you really want to go to Emerge or wait two years for surgery?”



Question, “What satiates these people that have put themselves above;

“Where Canada is founded upon principles that recognize the supremacy of God and the rule of law: ”?



My point is, as none of the above satiates these people we need to look elsewhere. To the other side of our cultural Morals and Ethics, to the other side of our Charter, of Human Rights, and Rights under local laws, such as the MVA.



My point is, they seek and enjoy the Power from their Criminality. They know the policy is illegal and kills and maims and they continue on, knowing this. These people are deeply sick perverted mentally disturbed Humans.

They are Nazis. Nazis are not healthy Humans. Nazis care nothing for Democracy. They care nothing for the diversity of Humanity. They care nothing for life, different than their own color and mind set. The care nothing for the “... principles that recognize the supremacy of God and the rule of law: ...”. They care nothing for Humanity different than themselves, as those that are different are not acknowledged as Human; therefore things that have no Rights.

My point is, the choice to follow Fascist and Nazi beliefs is satiating these people or they wouldn't act like their acting.

Secondly, “Gangster”, mentioned above numerous times, better defined in Mike Knox's book, “Gangsta in the House, Understanding Gang Culture”, also defines their actions. Gangsters have a total disregard for Canada's laws, “... principles that recognize the supremacy of God and the rule of law: ”, they protect each other, they deny together, they lie and mislead, they falsify documents, they hire people with the same prejudice and hate, they care nothing for the Society that affords them a Good life, they attack and assault, and denigrate the character of those that oppose and expose them. Gangsters attack minorities, the vulnerable, the disenfranchised, the marginalized, and the aged. The care nothing for the Social Contract of Trust, they run on Fear and lie that their bonding is based on Trust. They base their togetherness on Fear not Trust, and that Fear is based upon what they do and how 'All will Fall', if 'one' deviates from their twisted sick lives.

My point is, Gangsterism is satiating these people.

Third, the above begs the Question; “Do these people also use Group Sex to gratify their needs?” as Gangsters and Nazis have large sex parties to celebrate their deviant behaviour; used as another deviant instrument to solidify false bonding and togetherness, therefore Trust.

Fourth, the above begs the Questions; “Do they go to Emerge to see their work?” These people know they're responsible for the unexplained continuous Overcrowding of Emerge Facilities and the inordinate number of deaths that Emerge Doctors called Press Conferences about, as that's what the Consequences of the illegal Policies is; after they take ten (10) percent of G Ps out of Public Service to administer the Driver Medical Examinations, clients have long wait – times to see their G P, which forces them to Emerge.

“Are they like Fire Starters that return to gloat over the place of harm?”

“Do these people go to Emerge to be satiated by the Consequences of their deviant behaviour?” and “Do they like the blood and guts, the screams of harm, and loss of life?”.



S G Bond, Martin, Howie, Dobbs and their colleagues continue on, as the Public is afraid of them and they have learned this; this cowardice and apathy reinforces their deviant behaviour.

And when we add the dynamic of Politics to the Gangster we come to understand they really are Nazis and they know Canadians are afraid to acknowledge this term, and that there are a few Politicians and Senior Public Servants that have earned this title.



Reader, “What do you believe Nazis and Gangsters do to celebrate their deviant behaviour of Criminality and Death?”



I never need to be quiet about these people and their actions.



Regards





Dave Jenkins





Those Contacted and Why



cc; Steve Martin, Superintendent of Motor Vehicles; PO Box 9254, Stn Prov Gov't, Victoria, BC, V8W 9J2



You get a copy because I'm not afraid and hide my work.

*

Liza Howie, Deputy Superintendent of Motor Vehicles, (or former Deputy who had obligations to me from that position whom is now listed as Director Corporate Initiatives​?), PO Box 9283, Stn Prov Gov't, Victoria, BC, V8W 9J7

You get a copy because I'm not afraid and hide my work.

*

Nicholas Simons, MLA, NDP, Rm 201, Parliament Buildings, Victoria, BC, V8V 1X4



You get this as you really need to know this and you can ask your leader why he's never stood up for himself, as he's diabetic and knows I'm Right. And ask the NDP MLA, lawyer, representing Nanaimo, why he chose to be quiet about this.

*

Kim Carter; Ombudsperson for the Province of British Columbia, PO Box 9039 Stn Prov Gov't, Victoria, BC, V8W 9A5



re; concerning the Ombudsperson's recent Report; “The Best Care: Getting it Right for Seniors in BC”. I've asked that an amendment to the report be written, as it is based upon the known demands upon B Cs Universal Health Care System and resources available. But illegal gov't policies and their demands upon the UHCS and their horrific consequences are disrupting our UHCS, which inhibits any revision of health care. Such large demands impact the availability of General Practitioners, causes the Overcrowded Emerge, Ambulatory delivery problems, hospital admittance, and surgery funding for Seniors. All problems created by the illegal demands coming from the Solicitor General's Office and the Office of the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles, which have not been acknowledge.

(I asked for the amendment before I knew the Guide was Published, so Kim Carter and the Ombudsperson need to know this, and the above.)

They need to know the above; as how can health care be revised when the above is not acknowledged and those who've been asked to review the Ombudsperson's Recommendations have been corrupted. The illegality and the covert activity by S G Bond and Steve Martin and Lisa Howie and other Senior Public Servants is exemplified by the corrupt and perverted behaviour concerning their refusal to abide by the BCHRT decision of 2009, where they were obliged to send me a copy of their phoney Driver's Guide, which is alleged or supposed to, legally prove the need for the diabetic policy and legally justify the consequences of the policy. This also involves those in the Ministry of Health and doctors supporting these illegal policies; all who are reviewing the Ombudsperson's Report. Monsters and Gangsters, and those involved in Crimes against Humanity reviewing an Ombudsperson's Report on Health Care. Just Great.

Secondly, Kim Carter is a former Judge who evaluated Crimes Against Humanity, Genocide, Canadian Military Crimes, and Human Atrocities caused by Politicians and Senior Public Servants against the Public of their own country.

Third, I'll also send this to the UN and the Hague, for Crimes Against Humanity, and Human Rights Watch, as we stop Genocide by exposing the people and their behaviour before the Genocide expresses itself. We try to expose Genocide before it happens so we do not need people like Judge Kim Carter; Ombudsperson for the Province of British Columbia, former Judge for Crimes Against Humanity.

*

CUPE; Canadian Union of Public Employees; CUPE BC, #510 – 4940 Canada Way, Burnaby, BC, V5G 4T3



“CUPE members work in hundreds of occupation that help keep communities strong. We work for municipalities, school boards, airlines, hospitals, nursing homes, libraries, colleges, universities, social service agencies, the ambulance service, public utilities, and other public institutions.” (from your webpage)

These policies are national and all illegal and the consequences impact your members as your fight for staff in the Brian Sinclair death exemplifies. I wrote those involved and the Manitoba and Winnipeg Police running the Investigation did not like the fact I exposed their involvement in the death, as they were trying to use a Nurse and a Clinic as the Scapegoat for the death, therefore numerous other deaths in Emerge facilities.

Don't forget, your members will be forced to administer these Brain and Mind Experiments for the Nazis.

You state you run on Democratic rules, well, that's what I'm fighting for also.

*

Indira Samarasekera, President; Office of the President, 3 - 1 University Hall, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, T6G 2J9.



President Samarasekera, this is my Formal complaint against Bonnie M Dobbs, staff member and Instructor, as I could not find a Form to do so.

I accuse Bonnie M Dobbs of theft, lying, breach of Trust, between the University and Students, and the University and the Public.

I accuse Dobbs of breach of your Code of Ethics, both as a learning institution and an academic researcher.

I accuse Dobbs of consciously covering up a Crime Against Humanity, as that's what the Consequences of the illegal BC Driver's Policy is and she knows this, as she is a PhD, academic researcher and took this task on knowing she would need to steal and lie to the Public in order to cover up the killing and slaughter the Government mistakenly acknowledged.

You get this as Bonnie M Dobbs is or was staff. You're a Research University, living on Good Will and Excellence, based upon Trust and Codes of Ethics. Dobbs stole research, placed it in an Affidavit, swore an Oath that all was legal to use and presented it to me and the BC Human Rights Tribunal in an effort to justify the Government's illegal type 2 Diabetic Drivers' Policy. I stood up to your thief and liar, deconstructed her Un – Professional Presentation and she withdrew it and that's why the Diabetic Policy is still illegal in BC.

This fact has forced the B C Government to write a Policy Paper on Disabled Drivers, as they had not fulfilled the demands of the Charter, the B C Human Rights Code, nor the Motor Vehicle Act, so Dobbs was supposed to contrive something to do this, to make the Disabled Policies legal. My Human Rights Complaints have driven this. Dobbs was supposed to deliver me the Guide to driving when it was completed. I gave her a year to complete the Guide where her boss then sicked their lawyers on me and told me to back off and I would get it when it was ready. It was ready and they just lied about it, this was 2010. I only learned that the Guide was completed in 2010. Dobbs has withheld the Guide from me as she knows she has not fulfilled the demands of the Charter, the HR Code, and the MVA.

By default, as she is a staff member and researcher, she has Research Standards, University Codes of Ethics and Trusts, that are always with her, she can never take her staff hat off. Never, and you know this.

My point is, your staff member is a liar and thief, criminal, and monster and she's running all this using the Trust, Prestige, and Status of the University of Alberta, Edmonton.

I want a Public Investigation into Dobbs' behaviour, her theft and lies, and breach of Oath of Affidavit. I want her stripped of any affiliation with your University. I want her PhD cancelled if you're allowed to do that. I want all her Research investigated to see if she really had legal Permission to use the Research she's used as References. I want Dobbs to explain to the Students of the University of Alberta, why she tells them not to steal, lie, falsify documents, or buy papers, or copy them from the internet, but it's ok for her to do this. I want Dobbs to explain to the University of Alberta, Students, and their parents why she stole Science to use against the diabetic, the disabled, and to cover – up an illegal Social Policy that's been acknowledged to Harm the Public.

Dobbs does not deserve a place within the University of Alberta, little lone earned a position as an Instructor.

Dobbs is out of control, her behaviour is that of a Gangster and Nazi, however, the U of A has the option of hiring a Communist, Socialist, Fascist or Nazi, as that's what a University's Education should be, exposure. But having a staff member that puts herself on a pedestal of the great untouchable “academic researcher”, who steals research from her colleagues, falsifies an Affidavit and abuses the status and prestige of your University, is not acceptable.

President Samarasekera, Dobbs also has deep psychological problems to do what she's done and needs help.

Indira Samarasekera, President of the University of Alberta, you need to suspend Bonnie M Dobbs immediately.

Secondly, as you'll read in the letter Dobbs has a husband running an illegal Un – Sanctioned Human Experiment on Seniors and Dobbs is involved. You also need to review all he has done if he's staff.

Third, as Dobbs has stolen and lied to me, a diabetic and disabled person, falsified her Curriculum Vitae, falsely used her position of Scholar and U of A Trusted employee, to deceive and manipulate, you need to ask Students about Dobbs, concerning how she has treated the diabetic and the disabled; “What have they need to do, to get those marks of excellence, to get into and stay in Medicine and other departments she works in?”

*

Students' Union Executive and Administrative Offices; Room 2-900, Students' Union Building, University of Alberta,
8900 - 114 Street NW, Edmonton, AB, Canada, T6G 2J7



Hello, you need to know all this, as you're paying for your education and now You and the managing staff of the University know a staff member is a liar, thief, corrupt, gangster, Nazi, and has deep psychological problems and needs help. This is a staff member with power and what she has done and is doing is absolutely wrong and you do not need to have corrupt people instructing you, playing with PhDs, as if they're God and above the Law.

Dobbs has abused her position of University Instructor to Students, and it's not acceptable.

To understand how deep the corruption is, how it has escalated over the years due to corruption in Government and the RCMP, and the apathy of British Columbians, Canadians, and the Press I now place my letters on a blog site; www.2diabetes.blogspot.com

Use this to defend yourself from corrupt Instructors and those playing God.

*

Prince George Citizen; Manager, PO Box 5700, Prince George, B C, V2L 5K9



You need to know what your Politician is really like. Maybe the survivors of Emerge deaths would like to know about the why of the Overcrowding, the Disabled Driver's Policies that cause it. Maybe they'd like to know about the illegal Seniors' Policy that's really an Illegal Un – Sanctioned Human Experiment.

Manager, all this really is happening and I don't deceive myself that you will investigate and expose Bond and what's she's doing as it really is corruption that shouldn't be happening in our country, but it is and the Press is afraid.

Ask yourself this, “Why does the Press investigate the Overcrowding in Emerge, and be told by Emerge Doctors that 50% of those there shouldn't be there and you never investigate “the why” of those 50%?” and “Why after so many professional people, doctors, nurses, administrators, and volunteers, the Overcrowding and the Inordinate number of deaths is still there?”

Answer, “Government demands are not acknowledged, therefore G P/Client availability is skewed, so clients go to Emerge?”

Manager, Solicitor General Bond knows illegal Drivers' Policies take 10%, or more, of General Practitioners out of Public Service to implement her illegal policy, that has been acknowledged as harming the Public. In other words she knows her illegal policy is the force that's causing the Overcrowding, therefore the killing and maiming and she's somehow rationalized this or justified this.

Manager, have S G Bond explain the above to you.

Or, “Do you already know this and are hiding it from the Public?” That had to be asked.

*

Honourable Vic Toews; Minister of Public Safety, House of Commons, Ottawa, ON, K1A 0A6



Questions, as the Minister of Public Safety, the Ministry that is supposed to manage the RCMP;

“How is our “democratic society”, (from the Charter), safe when the B C Government runs illegal Disabled Driver's Policies, which are responsible for the inordinate number of deaths and maiming in Overcrowded Emerge Facilities and the RCMP consciously buries this?”

(That's right the RCMP in Ottawa National Headquarters really did this, after reviewing my complaint to their Department that investigates crimes of Intellectual Property theft. This decision came after months of review where they only said they could do nothing. They even refused to confirm this decision on paper, where they would then need to sign their names for accountability, where you could then look them up and ask them why.)(How's that charade for covering your ass?)

Honourable Vic Toews, you should also know that when I sent my complaint concerning Dobbs' theft of protected research and the breached Affidavit and Mail Fraud, the person that accepted my complaint sent it back to me in pieces, with the statement scratched on the package, 'we don't do this kind of thing'. The person that wrote this did not put their name to their statement either; they consciously hide their twisted attitude and love of themselves. That RCMP person that did this is a liar, corrupt, incompetent, and a real asshole. I asked for an apology or fire the person. Nothing came of that complaint. They defended the idiot instead of firing him or her. I re – sent my material where it was reviewed and covered – up by others, mentioned above, than those in the Department reviewing Intellectual Property Rights infractions.

What this means is the Senior RCMP that managed this review say that running illegal policy, policy against the Demands and Objectives of the Crown, the Charter, that is known to kill and maime is ok to do.

That running an illegal policy that makes illegal demands against the diabetic is ok to do.

Question, “How quickly the RCMP forget that they previously Discriminated against the diabetic and would not allow diabetics to become RCMP. A Human Rights Discrimination Complaint changed that attitude and they say they will not investigate the corruption in the B C Solicitor General's Office and the Office of the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles concerning Discrimination concerning diabetics. Why?”

Question, “How is it that the RCMP will not investigate Martin and Howie for falsifying legal documents and breach of Oath of Office, even when a Formal Investigation does not need to be done, as they know the policy is illegal and the Government accidentally admitted to the Harm?”

My point is, they just need to charge Martin and Howie with breach of Oath of Office and breach of Trust, plus the harm they admitted to, and all the Gangsters will then begin to tell what's really happening. (The Corruption is just wonderful isn't it.)



Question, Honourable Vic Toews, “Why would the RCMP hide this?”

Answer, As you know Politics is like poker or other games of chance, one hides one's hand to play later, there's always biding and bargaining. As you know bargaining for Contracts are also like playing poker, one does not reveal one's hand until the needed moment; things are collected and saved.

So, the RCMP hide these crimes and wait, as the Senior Staff that reviewed my Complaint know B C will be renewing their Contract with the RCMP in a few years. (Despite the problems within the Senior RCMP they do look forward, they do look to the future, they know and acted upon what exposed a few years ago, and now exposing.)

Their bargaining begins and they bargain with the very person responsible for the illegal policies and the killing and maiming, the manager of the corrupt “academic researcher” who is a thief and liar, who stole research and breached of Intellectual Property Rights, who's responsible for the falsification of documents, breaches of Oath of Office; the Solicitor General of British Columbia and his or his team of corrupt Senior Public Servants; Solicitor General Bond.

My point is, and wouldn't you know the Press is demanding why Solicitor General Bond, the Minister of Public Safety, for some unknown reason, abruptly quit negotiations and signed a twenty year contract with the RCMP.

My point is, Yes, the RCMP must of thought they had gone to heaven when they finally Deconstructed my letters only to find corruption beyond their belief and it was now in their hands and all they had to do was lie to me, dismiss me, and bury me; a diabetic, a socially contrived Pariah of Society, a person without funds for lawyers to challenge anyone. And then, a few years later, when I had been out of the picture, they could use all the information needed to sign long term contracts.

But, Honourable Vic Toews, Corruption begets Corruption, and I'm still here exposing Treason, Corruption, Discrimination, Crimes Against Humanity, Hate, Bigotry, and Prejudice. I'm still here writing for my Charter Rights, Human Rights, and Rights under the Motor Vehicle Act. (The Corruption is just wonderful isn't it.)



Honourable Vic Toews, as explained above this Kind, Style, or Form of killing is defined by the United Nations as a Crime Against Humanity and those in the Ottawa RCMP know this, as they are not naïve bystanders, and they read letters similar to the letter above that I sent them, all now at the blog site just in case Martin or his thugs kill me. These Senior RCMP that reviewed my complaint are very well educated and well trained and know what a Crime Against Humanity is, and they covered it up. Why not, it's only a 120 people a year, in B C, and the deaths are well hidden through the Overcrowding of Emerge and driver mishaps.



Questions, “How is it that the Ottawa RCMP covered – up a Crime Against Humanity that the B C Government's Ministry of Public Safety, Solicitor General Bond, initiated and is trying to cover it up?”

“How is Canada to support the RCMP when they've buried my complaint against the B C Government and it's illegal policies that are known to kill and maim the naïve bystander in Emerge and those waiting for surgery.”

“How is Canada to support the RCMP when they buried my complaint against Steve Martin, the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles, for falsifying legal documents in order to run his illegal driver's policies.”

“How is Canada to support the RCMP when they buried my complaint against Steve Martin, the SMV, for falsifying legal documents in order to have the RCMP use his “Notice of Prohibition” to suspend and cancel drivers' licenses?” (That's right, Martin falsified the “Notice of Prohibition” in order to have ICBC, the RCMP, and other B C Police forces do his criminal work for him; to suspend and cancel licenses with documents that do not have legal tender.)

Questions, Honourable Vic Toews, “How does the RCMP knowingly use false documents against the Public?” and “What's that make them?”

Answer, “They do this because it was something given to S G Bond in the Bargaining for a new contract.” Something always needs to be given, so the RCMP uses false documents, which no one really knew about, which binds them to S G Bond and her corruption and Crime Against Humanity, and both are quiet about everything.



Honourable Vic Toews, someone broke into your personal information and made it Public. You didn't feel very good about that; I believe you set 'the hounds of hell' out to discover who did this. So, you take that feeling and times it by 1000 and now you know how I feel about being illegally attacked by idiots in the Governments Car Industry, how I feel when Martin attacked assaulted me and denigrated my character and S G Bond didn't fire him or charge him with a breach of Oath of Office, or a Crime Against Humanity. And then a year after that assault I discover he had completed the Guide the year before and refused to send it to me. You tell me how you'll feel if you become diabetic or disabled and have these people lie and contrive you as the Pariah in society.

My point is, what ever was exposed, and as the break – in is nasty, an assault, this is nothing to being labeled a Pariah and having the things done and said about me, and all the while having Monsters and Nazis kill and maime hundreds of naïve bystanders a year under the guise they're making the world a better place.

Diabetes impacts 10% of our society and there is nothing to prove I should be treated differently by the OSMV and its thugs, bullies, traitors and murders, than anyone else, as if I really was problematic the Research would have been presented to me years ago and I wouldn't be here.

Secondly, if I was a problem insurance companies would charge me more and they don't.

Honourable Vic Toews, if you can't take these people on, expose them through the corruption of the RCMP, then you should Resign.

Question, “Why resign?”

Answer, “Because you are now involved in absolute Corruption, a Crime Against Humanity, and you either cover it up or fight for Canada and Humanity, against very corrupt Humans, pretending they're nice people and obeying the Law.

My point is, if you don't do something the illegal Human Experiment being run by Dobbs husband, for S G Bond, against the Senior Driver, will turn into Genocide, and it's All Canadians' job and obligation to do what ever is needed to STOP Genocide, no matter where it is.

*

Commission for Public Complaints Against the RCMP; National Intake Office, PO Box 88689, Surrey, B C, V3W 0X1



Reader, to save space the above to Honourable Vic Toews should be read and included here.



I accuse the RCMP of covering up Discrimination, coming from the illegal diabetic policy and all its killing and maiming, as they know themselves they are not allowed to treat diabetics differently for no reason.

I accuse the RCMP of covering up the illegal diabetic policy and all its killing and maiming.

I accuse the RCMP of covering up a Crime Against Humanity.

I accuse the RCMP of knowingly using illegal documents to suspend and cancel drivers licenses and in doing so, this act, knowing it's illegal, is an act of Discrimination against me and every other person the “Notice of Prohibition” has been used against.

I accuse the RCMP of protecting B C Solicitor General Bond, from her acts of Treason, running illegal policy against the Demands and Objectives of the Charter.

I accuse the RCMP of protecting B C Solicitor General Bond, from the illegal acts of the “academic researcher”, Dobbs, who stole research and falsified an Affidavit for Bond, in her effort to justify her illegal driving policy and its killing.

I accuse the RCMP of covering up Martin and Howie's illegal diabetic policy and all its killing and maiming.

I accuse the RCMP of protecting Martin and Howie from their illegal acts and the acts of their “academic researcher”, Dobbs, who stole research and falsified an Affidavit for them, in their effort to justify their illegal driving policy and its killing.

I accuse the RCMP of protecting B C Solicitor General Bond, Martin, Howie, and Dobbs from their illegal acts, which are a breach of their Oaths of Office of; do not kill, harm, lie, steal, mislead, misinform, and misrepresent, etc etc.

I accuse the RCMP of protecting B C Solicitor General Bond, Martin, Howie, and Dobbs from their illegal acts, which are a breach of Trust between the Government and the Public and breach of Trust between Senior Public Servants and the Public.



Reader, this is enough to start an Inquiry, to make this Public, to force the Government to explain themselves, to make the OSMV put this illegal policy on hold, as they and you know the illegal policy kills and maims.

I will send you letters, if you want, that I've sent S G Bond, the RCMP and ICBC and the Winnipeg Police who are Investigating the death of Brian Sinclair, in an Emerge, which exemplifies the killings in our Emergency Facilities and as the RCMP are trying to cover this up, the Winnipeg Police are also doing the same.

Lastly, Honourable Vic Toews is from Manitoba, and being a long term Politician and lawyer, by default, he will know about Sinclair's death and the Investigation and the efforts of Government to deny responsibility and accountability.

*

Francis M. Deng; UN Secretary General's Special Advisor on the Prevention of Genocide, 760 United Nations Plaza,

New York, NY, 10017, USA

Office of the United Nations High Commission for Human Rights, Palais des Nations, CH – 1211 Geneva 10, Switzerland

Olivier De Schutter, United Nations Special Rapporteur on the Right to Food; Universite de Louvain – SSH/JURI/PJTD – College Thomas More – Place Montesquieu, 2, bte L2.07.01- 1348 Louvain – la – Neuve - Belgium



You get a copy because Olivier De Schutter, “United Nations Special Rapporteur on the Right to Food”, actually had the tenacity to confront Canada and our poverty, even though we are not Blue Hats, Peacekeepers, anymore but Warriors for NATO.

Readers, as a taxpaying Canadian you live off my taxes, as Canada pays it's way with the UN, and I have the Right that you bring this forward and expose the corrupt, as you do in other states, Republics, and Democracies.

If Canadians had confronted those I exposing we would not be in the middle of Crimes Against Humanity,

Un – Sanctioned Human Experiments, and now living on the Brink of Genocide.



My point is, I have no Idea why Canada is so cowardly concerning these ignorant, cowardly, and corrupt Politicians and absolutely corrupt Senior Public Servants, where the apathy and malaze by Canada, the Press, and Human Rights groups are not acceptable, as it only reinforces the perverted twisted behaviour of the monsters I've found myself confronting.

The people I'm exposing are “Not Democrats”, and they are not “Fools” or “Just Misguided”, which takes us to Nazis, and Nazis really are rotten and dysfunction Humans that need to be confronted.

My point is, every day these illegal policies continue the Government instigated killing and maiming escalates, as our health care declines because General Practitioners and Doctors are not available, as they are filling out useless illegal Un – Sanctioned Medical Human Examinations and Forms, as our society grows in age our demand upon the Universal Health Care System makes more demands upon the General Practitioner, which brings another circle into being; as we age, more people have diabetes therefore more are Examined by this illegal medical examination which takes more G P out of Public service. So, as some in Canada are in denial of this illegal demand and the horrific consequences their denial worsens the killing and exacerbates the fear of going to Emerge Facilities for Health Care, as the Overcrowding is not explained, as it really is Government instigated, Government killing its own People for Politicians and Senior Public Servants lust for power, perverted control over the Public, and the sexual desire of power over life and death.

My point is, Democracy is a fickle thing, a dynamic entity always working to make Society a better place and what's happening here is the opposite and you know it. The denial also sees the wasting or the chipping away of our Charter Rights, Human Rights, and local Rights such as under the Motor Vehicle Act, which is the opposite of what a “democratic society”, such as Canada is supposed to work for, to work as hard as it can to fulfill the demands of the Charter, Human Rights and local laws such as the MVA.

You have a Legal and Humanitarian Right to expose all this, to make Canada and the World a better place.

Lastly, remember, last year, when I exposed Martin's illegal policy to the world again he personally attacked and assaulted me, he lied and used his official government position to falsify documents in order to denigrate my character, all done to harm me to show me who's the real Boss, not the Charter, the Human Rights Code, and the Motor Vehicle Act, but him and his Nazis buddies.

He moved away from the arms length of Crimes Against Humanity he's causing and attacked me personally and Solicitor General Bond and the RCMP did nothing to him. They covered – up his actions and all the while knowing I had not been sent the “BC 2010 Guide in Determining Fitness to Drive” that Premier Clark, S G Bond, and Martin had promised. Promised in order to fulfill the demands of the Laws of Canada.

Nazis get bolder and bolder as society pretends they are not there, which has only reinforced Martin's deviant behaviour and the next step really is to kill the figure that's confronting and exposing him.

United Nations, again, I don't know what's wrong with Canada to have this apathy and malaze that is allowing these monsters to be doing this, little lone allowing them to begin assaulting Seniors in our Country. This Senior Driver Cognitive Examination really is an Un – Sanctioned Brain and Mind Experiment by absolutely corrupt “academic researchers”.

You need to inform the world of these monsters, as it seems Canada is afraid of these Nazis.

*



Reader, I will continue sending this letter to the world and place it online as Crimes Against Humanity are not acceptable. And Solicitor General Bond and her criminal Senior Public Servants do not have the Right to take Canada to the Brink of Genocide and the World needs to know this.