56 pp, May 31, 2012, letter to BC Ombudsperson concerning health care needs

The following letter was sent to the Ombudsperson as it was requested to write a Report concerning future care for Seniors.  Without knowing what I've found myself within, illegal gov't policy that takes 20% of General Practitioners taken from service to implement the illegal policy concerning diabetic and disabled drivers, where will we, the Public, get the G Ps and funding needed to implement the Recommendations as the gov't is not honest about it's demands upon the Uninversal Health Care System and have not informed the Ombudsperson or the Public of this grand demand upon the UHCS?  As the driver's policy is illegal and not acknowledged by the Solicitor Generals Office as to what it is, what does this say about gov't demands from other Ministries and Departments?
I've asked the Ombudsperson to write an Ammendment to the Report on Seniors as the Ombudsperson now has pertinent information needed to truely evaluate the demands upon the UHCS and what it can do, but only if all demands are acknowledged, such as the illegal demands coming from the S G Office which causes the Overcrowding in Emerge which kills a 100 people a year.  And you wonder why the S G Office and the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles and his Deputy do not inform the Public of their illegal activities.  And now you need to wonder how many their new illegal policy concerning Seniors will kill throught the stress and strain upon seniors as being labelled a Pariah in society.  Where they will need to be Experimented upon to test their cognitive abilities and skills by the same corrupt scientists that I caught stealing science in their effort to justify the illegal diabetic drivers policy.  They withdrew their stolen reseach after I caught them and exposed their theft and lies.  Now these same corrupt Politicians, their corrupt  Senior Public Servants, and their corrupt so called scientists are attacking seniors for no proven fault or need other than hate and corruption.

Dave Jenkins


3107 Tanglewood Way

Nanaimo, BC, V9T 5A5

May 3, 2012




Kim Carter; Ombudsperson for the Province of British Columbia.

PO Box 9039 Stn Prov Gov't

Victoria, BC, V8W 9A5



re; concerning the Report; “The Best Care: Getting it Right for Seniors in BC.”


An Amendment to your Report needs to be Published to allow those trying to Implement your Recommendation know the walls they will run into and the “Why”.





Hello Kim Carter;



Firstly, I apologize for the length and tardiness of this letter but I had a rethink and decided you should have your own letter not just copies of what I've written before; for you to make Connections. You're addressing Seniors, I'm now a Senior, and you really do not know how deep the Connections go concerning my last ten year of writing to better our Universal Health Care System, UHCS, and the unexplained walls your Recommendations will run into.



Secondly, I could not just say; “I have a favour to ask of you, as you need to make an Amendment to you Report or it will just collect dust somewhere.”

Even with an Amendment it may, as you're the “Outsider” and your Report exposes the Incompetences and Inequities of those that should be doing what you're Recommending. I've also exposed Politicians and senior Public Servants for their Incompetences, Inequities, and illegal demands upon the UHCS and you are Not going to like what I've found myself within.



Thirdly, I now worry for my Life, as last year I was attacked, assaulted, and had my character denigrated by the people I have exposed, they cancelled my license and wrote I had been found “unfit”, all lies. All because I exposed their illegal diabetic policy to a new player in my Inquiry, the Insurance Corporation of British Columbia, ICBC. (ICBC, p 26).

I've been demanding my Rights and exposing the illegal demands upon the UHCS since 2002 and the policy is still illegal and the consequences of that Policy still causing Overcrowded Emergency Facilities, using 20% of G Ps to fulfill the policies demands, causing long wait – times for surgery and ambulatory delivery, and Emerge Admittance instead of through a G P or Specialist; also 50 – 75 million dollars disappears each year to pay for this illegal policy. Emerge deaths are explained by “Overcrowding”, which is caused by illegal gov't policy, such as the diabetic policy; this Harm has been admitted to by gov't. Yes, you've read that right. The Ombudsman acknowledge my complaint concerning all this when the gov't refused to acknowledge my Inquiry and how the BC HRT bowed to gov't and buried my complaints. (Ombudsperson and an Amendment, pp 3 – 4, and History with Ombudsman, p 20.)

With this very personal attack from Martin, the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles, and how he said he had tracked me, how he lied about me driving under a driving restriction and being “unfit”, which is the worst of all designations, and how he lied on official gov't papers to cancel my license, my worry is justified, as they know they're killing people with their illegal policies. ( The “Big Idea” of Death and “Scale”, pp 24 – 26.)

Martin and his colleagues all guilty of running illegal policy, which harms and is against the Objectives and Demands of the Crown. I don't think your Recommendations are. The diabetic policy really is an unsanctioned Human Experiment upon diabetics and the disabled. This new driving policy against Seniors is also an unsanctioned Human Experiment and those running it are the same people that stole Science and falsified an Affidavit in order to justify the diabetic policy. I Deconstructed that BC HRT presentation and it was withdrawn. (Human Experiment, pp 42 – 46.)



Throughout the following you'll be reminded how Martin and his Deputy, Howie, and Government have acknowledge this harm and continue on knowing the consequences of the policy. And how these demands and consequences change our UHCS. The harm is the inordinate number of deaths and maiming in Emerge and those waiting for surgery.

The repetitions are deliberate, or I may write “I need to set – up someone” to expose another Big Idea, Scale, Connection for Context and clarity; done so the reader does not say “how did I end up here”. What has happened to me over the years is complicated and it's beyond just nasty and Big Ideas, Scale, Connections and Context are needed to understand the corruption your Recommendations will run into, and this is only successful if ideas are set – up by review. There are too many ideas and connections not to do this.



Carter, you're not going to like what you read, as a Lawyer and Judge, as a Canadian, but it's all True and impacts your Recommendations due to the Grand Scale of the policies, the demands upon the UHCS, and the Consequences.

By the time you finish reading this you'll know if you need to protect yourself from repercussions or retribution for writing an Amendment to your Report, as you will have new data to adjust your Report, just as is done in legal cases.

I'm sending you the most recent letters concerning the illegal diabetes policy and the consequences, that instigated Martin's attack, and if he does kill me your office and you, as a lawyer and judge, will have a record. The Corruption really is deep and protected by Government and you will come to understand how it will impact your Recommendations and the need for an Amendment if you're Recommendations are not to collect dust somewhere.



Lastly, just in case you're one of those readers that read the first few pages and then go to the last chapter to see if Connections have been made I've reviewed the following in the sections Conclusion and Amendment, pp 52 – 56.

*

My Credentials

My first BC HRT Discrimination Complaint changed who pays for the Drivers Medical Examinations; it's not online as it was withdrawn for promises made by Government. The change not only included change for type 2 diabetics, which I am, but type 1s and All disabled drivers; gov't initiated to make me go away. The gov't now pays the first $75 for the diabetic Driver's Medical Examination, DME. Imagine the power of the questions concerning the illegality of the policy and its consequences for the Government to do that. Imagine the power for the gov't to bring about that change and promise a Policy Paper concerning diabetic driving or cancel the policy as its not needed. Yes, that's right, there was nothing to justify the policy, and how does one justify the consequences and there's nothing today. It's called corruption and I exposed it.

I Reviewed or made Amendments to a Draft, a Policy, and another Draft concerning a diabetic Policy Paper but nothing came of it as promised and that was early 2007; therefore I lodged my third Discrimination complaint where the stolen research, mentioned above, was presented. I Deconstructed that BC HRT presentation and the 200 stolen articles were withdrawn and the HRT said nothing. The HRT then buried my Right to complain until the OSMV produced a Policy Paper concerning the diabetic driver. They did this knowing the gov't had just stolen research, then withdrew it, and knowing the policy was illegal and harmed. The BC HRT buried my complaint; through threats as Martin threatened me? Connections need to be made, a Big Idea understood, to the players in that complaint. The same corrupt “academic researcher” Dobbs, was not fired for stealing, for falsifying an Affidavit, etc, but was kept on to produce some kind of Driving Policy Paper concerning all medical conditions monitored by Bond, Martin and Howie, or the Solicitor General's Office or the OSMV. What is she going to steal in order to justify those policies and consequences? Now Dobbs has turned up with her husband with the attack upon Seniors running an unsanctioned, illegal, and unethical Human Experiment.

Big Idea for my Credibility. Solicitor General Bond, Martin, Howie, and their corrupt colleagues have not fulfilled the demands of the Charter, the BC HR Code, and the Motor Vehicle Act. That's right, they care nothing for the Laws of Canada. This means they're Traitors, as they run policy which is Opposite or in Opposition to the Demands and Objectives of the Crown. And this is for 400 000 diabetics in B C and Martin states the OSMV manages 100 medical conditions; this means approximately 80% of B C population have had their Charter Rights invalidated or forfeited for incompetent, cowardly and corrupt Politicians and absolutely corrupt senior Public Servants. Scale and Connections are needed to see the problems within our UHCS, which will impact any new demands upon it, such as bona fide needs for Senior Care.

*



This is IMPORTANT as I'm also defending “Seniors” and “Science”

Bond and Martin state that the Dobbs' computer toy can measure Senior's Psychological competences.

What's the name of the Human Experiment where Dobbs' husband Proved his Computer Toy as Bona fide?

Big Idea. Who did Dobbs' husband use his computer toy on to have his wife, Martin, Howie, and Bond state it's a bona fide computer toy, or a Scientifically Proven Instrument that can measure Seniors Physical and Psychological behaviour? What was the name of the Original Human Experiment? What was the name of the Management Committee that Sanctioned the Human Experiment? What was the Code of Ethics they followed? What was the Purpose of the Experiment? What was the Procedure? What did they really discover? What were the Scientific Conclusions? Who were the original Human Subjects? Were Seniors harmed? Was the Experiment stopped due to Harm? Were the Recommendations and Interventions then processed through the Scientific Method for bona fide (ness), Good and Harm?

They can't answer any of the above or they would have already. As Dobbs lied about the Science she stole concerning my Discrimination Complaint she and her husband are lying here, stating the computer toy is bona fide and that it has gone through the Scientific Method for all their Scientist colleagues to Peer Review for bona fide (ness). Once a liar always a liar. Once protected by the Gang members always protected. (Gang addressed pp 47 – 50.)

They're running a unprofessional, unsanctioned, unguided, illegal Human Experiment on unsuspecting subjects, Seniors, whom are not protected from Harm. The Dobbs' are harming Peoples minds. They have no Right to go into Senior's minds and screw with them. The Dobbs' are absolutely out of control; they're Humans run amuck. For Bond to sanction this Human Experiment exemplifies how corrupt Bond is. This is what the Fascists and Nazis did to people they didn't like, the disabled and aged, they experimented on them under the unproven statements of “unfitness” and doing Good for society. Martin and Howie also sanction this Crime Against Humanity and we also know they are liars, their policy kills, and Martin attacked me. (Human Experiment addressed pp 41 – 45.)

This Experiment needs to be stopped before one (1) Senior dies or is even harmed. With the first death from this illegal, immoral Senior driver policy the death can be realized as Genocide, as the gov't is attacking a very select Class of People for no bona fide reason and their Experimentors know Seniors, as they study them.

*



Ombudsperson and an Amendment

Ombudsman. A few years ago the Ombudsman read my Complaints against the gov't and it was made very clear to me that the Ombudsman would support me, but could not change Policy, only make Recommendations, as you have done with your Report. I decided to continue on by myself, as I did not believe any work from the Ombudsman could deal with the Corruption I had found myself within, as too many Canadians are in denial already. Maybe Canadians will address this today, as it seems we want a working bona fide Universal Health Care System, UHCS, and do care for Seniors, as today Federal TV commercials are confronting and exposing Senior Abuse. Today, we live so long we now see ourselves through Seniors and the horror some live within; maybe that will scare enough People to help you and me confront Gov't corruption.



Secondly, for the betterment of British Columbia, our UHCS, Seniors, Canada, our Democracy, and Humanity I believe you need to make an Amendment to your Report on Seniors. Illegal Government behaviour needs to be exposed or your Recommendations will collect dust because there will Not be taxes or G Ps available to work with the future needs of Seniors; especially with the large bubble of Seniors to come and more illegal government demands.

Carter, as a Lawyer and Judge you know cases can be re – visited if new information is discovered concerning what the case is about and how the lack of information influenced the composed Recommendations, composed as compared to the contrived disinformation coming from one party; the gov't in this instance. New information that gives or allows one to understand the case with a new perspective, which changes how the case should be seen if one party, the gov't, had been honest to you, as you collected information concerning government policy and its consequences concerning Seniors and the UHCS. Without knowing all demands upon the Public, the UHCS, and Taxes, Recommendations such as yours will not be realized or even entertained, as the 'instruments of change', taxes and G Ps, used to implement those recommendations are not really there, as the Government does not acknowledge its demands upon the Public, the UHCS, Seniors, nor the consequences of those demands; therefore the total available 'instruments of change' are not what they seem to be.



Third, you are not going to like what I've found myself within and what has happened to me should not happen to anyone. What has happened to me really does impact your Recommendations concerning Seniors and our UHCS and you shouldn't know about it, as you are not a Senior, not a diabetic, and have not been confronting Gov't and its illegal policies for the past ten years. You haven't followed this as you believe the gov't is obeying the law especially as they make Grand demands upon the UHCS and G Ps; we just infer the demands are legal, but they're Not.



Fourth, with one hand the Government is accepting your Report, an insincere support, and with the other hand illegally attacking Seniors with it's new illegal, un – Sanctioned, Social – Psychological Human Experiment concerning Senior driving; being run by the same corrupt “academic researcher”, Dobbs, that lied, stole research, breached an Affidavit, and breached the Trust of Science, Government, and Oaths of Office in an effort to justify illegal gov't Policy concerning diabetic drivers; Dobbs did this with the support of Martin and gov't. They withdrew the presentation after I confronted them about what they did. The BC HRT refused to acknowledge this criminal behaviour and breach of Trust, etc. The illegal driving policy that is now playing out concerning senior drivers is also important to know about, as this negatively impacts the Recommendations of your report more than you understand, as they players are corrupt and they now see you as their new Enemy because you've exposed their Inequities and Incompetence. That's what Recommendations do, don't they.

That's why Gov't Hates me and has recently attacked, assaulted, and denigrated my character all in an effort to show me who's Boss, to stop me from writing and asking questions about what they're doing to Canada, the UHCS, and the Public. It was not a very nice experience. Carter, what do they do to me after this letter? Kill me? The consequences of their illegal policies kill at least one person a month in Overcrowded Emerge facilities and they know this. Their deviant behaviour has escalated over the past years as people are afraid of them and they know this. After you read these letters, and understand the consequences of the illegal policies, you will understand why they attacked me. Killing me would just be 'Road Kill' to these people. Carter, what would you do if they did this to you after the Report? After an Amendment?



Lastly, I now write because those that have recently attacked and assaulted me and denigrated my character, broke the demands of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, the Human Rights Code, the Motor Vehicle Act, and their Oaths of Office are now attacking me, as I've lived long enough to now be considered a Senior. As with the illegal diabetic policy I do not need to be quiet, and I will not be quiet while these same incompetent, cowardly, and corrupt Politicians and absolutely corrupt Senior Public Servants and their Fascist or Nazi “academic researcher” run an unethical, amoral, unsanctioned Human Experiment against Senior Drivers; another vulnerable Class of People in British Columbia. The very People you are Writing for. Carter, these people are not Democrats like me and I do not need to be quiet to Fascists and Nazis.

I also write to make Canada a better Place and to make the World a better place and this takes Time. I write as I don't have money to buy Time.

*





Why I Write

Carter, I write to make the world a better place, as you do. I write for my Constitutional Rights, which have been not only denied to me, but denied to 3 000 000 other Canadians, as diabetes is now 10% of society and in ten years will be 20%. I write for all the other disabled that believe the gov't demands upon them are bona fide and justified; is this 80% of society? What's the real Scale, as the OSMV states it monitors 100 medical conditions for the betterment of society?

I write for all the kids that have diabetes and think they're monsters but don't know the adults such as Solicitor General Bond, Superintendent of Motor Vehicles, Martin, and his Deputy, Howie, and their corrupt “academic researcher” Bonnie Dobbs, are the real monsters for contriving such lies about diabetics and institutionalizing their bigotry.

I write for my Human Rights, which have also been denied me.

I write for my Rights under the Motor Vehicle Act, which have been negated by bias, hate, fear and loathing, disgust, contempt, discrimination, prejudice, bigotry and the falsification of documents, both Crown and letters to the Public.

I write for the people you write for; health care workers trying to make the world a better place not knowing the government is their unknown problem.

I write for Seniors, as they also have Rights and are being denied them.

I write because I'm Right, it's Legal, and it's Good for the Public Good. (John Ralston Saul's book “A Fair Country” mentions this but with different words, p 137, he quoted it from Joseph Howe, 1835, who was thinking about his presentation concerning Free Speech, where he asks himself what he's doing and came to the conclusion that what he was doing fulfilled “what is right, what is just, what is for the public good.”) By default you are doing the same, as I am. You're working for a better “democratic society” of Canada and a better World.

The people that I'm exposing are doing none of the above. Their behaviour is Wrong, it's Unjust, and Illegal, and there is no Public Good. They're liars, thieves, bullies, thugs, criminals, traitors, and murders; murders, as they know they are harming and have not changed their behaviour; they've chosen, by their Free Will, to consciously continue with their known illegal harmful actions. And because it's Government Policy the killing is called Democide; large numbers of the Pubic killed by gov't policy.

Carter, you don't think they'll kill me for exposing them to you? Their Human Experiment upon unsuspecting Seniors is Wrong, Unjust, and Illegal beyond understanding and they know it. They'll never stop on their own, as they have a taste for killing and playing God. And they know the Public is afraid of them. Your Report confronts them, as I do.

*



Big Ideas, Scale, Context and Connections.

Carter, by default, you understand Big Ideas, Scale, and you understand Connections for Context. Without acknowledging and applying these strategies you wouldn't have a Report or be able to do what you've done and do. These instruments need to be acknowledged concerning the following letter and accompanying letters or you will not really understand why your Recommendations will not be implemented and how they will be buried to collect dust. As stated above there is no fault associated with you or the Ombudsperson for not knowing the following, as you, the Public, and I expect and demand Government and senior Public Servants to obey the demands of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, our Human Rights Code, our Motor Vehicle Act, their Oaths of Office, obey the Trust between Government and the Public, and the Trust of the Social Contract that keeps us all from each other's throats, and they have breached all of these.

As the Government stonewalled, broke their Crown Settlement Agreement with me, have not fulfilled their promises to me, and not fulfilled the demands of the Charter, the Human Rights Code, the Motor Vehicle Act, and their Oaths of Office concerning my Inquiry into their Illegal policies and my subsequent Discrimination Complaint why should anyone believe your Recommendations will be implemented, as “You are Not Them”. You are not on the Inside, you are the Outside, as I am. You are their worst Enemy, you've criticized them as I have, and in Public too, written down for all to see.

You've criticized these people and exposed their incompetencies, as I have. You are now, as I am, their enemy. Welcome to the rotten, corrupt, perverted slice of the Spectacle of Life I've found myself within. The driving policies that I mention really are illegal and the Scale of the illegal demand upon UHCS is important to come to understand, as diabetes is now 10% of society, prostate cancer impacts 9% of men, breast cancer 7% of women, mental health 20% and now add the other 96 medical conditions the Office of the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles, OSMV, states it manages for the betterment of society and you come to glimpse the Scale of corruption I've found myself within. Each condition forces drivers to undergo a Driver's Medical Examination, DME, if one wants to drive. Carter, I have credibility, because of my first B C Human Rights Discrimination Complaint our taxes now pay for these DMEs, but the DMEs have never been proved to be able to do what they're alleged to be able to do. That's right. You've read that correctly.

How many of these monitored medical conditions express to Seniors? How many Seniors, like me, already visit their G P for that specific condition? How many like me, a type 2 diabetic, visit the G P twenty (20) times compared to the one (1) forced visit by the OSMV? Why won't the gov't and the OMSV acknowledged this Medical Care? Carter, where are we, the Public, going to find the G Ps for your Recommendations, as 20% or more of the body of G Ps are filling out phoney DMEs and Forms for just the OSMM in the Solicitor Generals' Office? What's the total for the S G or Gov't?

*

Think Scale and Big Ideas. 4.3 million people in BC, most of us are drivers, 400 000 diabetic drivers, 360 000 prostate problems, 280 000 breast cancers, mental health 800 000 people, and now add the other 96 medical conditions monitored by the OSMV; all taking G Ps out of the UHCS and using taxes through illegal ways and means.

As you can see the numbers are Grand, almost incomprehensible and unbelievable until you look at the percents and add them together. These are the numbers the Gov't and ICBC provide. It's just arithmetic, no statistics, no calculus, or special formula, just Scale, to build Connections and Context of the Big Idea of how Grand the Government's demands upon the Public and the UHCS really are. And they really are not acknowledged, which means they are not managed properly, therefore not funded properly, therefore G P/Client ratios are skewed. Over the past few years they've escalated their deviant behaviour against me and my Recommendations and you think the same people I've exposed for their bias, hate, discrimination, prejudice, bigotry, corruption, inequities and incompetences are going to implement your Recommendations for Seniors?

People are in denial of the above numbers because they are so Grand, which means the consequences of these illegal driving policies are also Grand, and yet the gov't continues on with its illegal policies, which have not been proved to be needed or offer any Good. Start thinking about the mental state of these people that are doing this. These will be the same people, as they all make Connections through policies, shared taxes, departments, and ministries, that you've exposed.

Big Ideas, Scale, and Connections need to be remembered, as they impact you, as they impact me and I remind the Politicians and senior Public Servants of this and the consequences of their actions, which are horrible.



Carter, never forget, I cannot say this enough as it exemplifies and proves “Hate”. I voluntarily visit the G P every three months for diabetes care only and this in Not acknowledged by gov't, who force me to undergo their phoney DME once every five years. If you had a disease wouldn't you visit your G P more than once every five years? Wouldn't your G P manage your disease, as concerned with your disease and any intervention? Why can't Politicians and senior Public Servants acknowledge I visit the G P and he and I take care me?

Their Bias, Hate, Fear and Loathing, Contempt, Disgust, Discrimination, Prejudice, and Bigotry disallows any acknowledgment that diabetics do take of themselves, as this declaration would stymy their discrimination and power over the Public and Doctors. Doctors are also forced to comply under threat of penalty. Hate is part of Corruption; the Big Ideas driving Corruption are Lust, Status, Power, Prestige, Money, Hate, the joy of the Criminality, and the Hunt of People.

The diseases or medical conditions monitored include people with multiple diseases and conditions monitored for their life time, like me, and semi – monitored while in treatment. It's Wrong – Thinking from Gov't and the OSMV that these people do not visit their G P firstly or a Specialist for care, therefore the need for the phoney auto industry DME.

Again, my numbers are based upon 4.3 million people in B C and most of us are drivers. As the numbers are so Grand a percent here and there does not really mean much on the Grand Scale, which leads us to approximately, the equivalent to, 20% of G Ps are debited from the G P pool to complete these DME. And due to my Discrimination Complaint, 2004 – 2006, concerning all this, your and my taxes now pay $75 for each DME; this could be $50 000 000 a year for a phoney medical exam. What would that do for Seniors and whatever bona fide medical needs of your Report?

Connections and Context, the consequences of the G P debit causes the Emerge Overcrowding and harms society and the Solicitor General, the OSMV, and the Ministry of Health acknowledged this in a joint letter. I had asked both ministry's why they were doing this illegal policy not justified by Science. The letter from the Min of Health acknowledged the harm and as far as they knew there was no Science to justify the policy. I couldn't believe what I was reading and complained the letter only had the Letterhead, of the Ministry of Health, so the Solicitor General at the time wrote me a personal letter confirming it was a joint letter. Do you think his corrupt staff enlightened him about the Connections, Context, content, and meaning of the letter or just had him sign it? The G P that signed the letter for the Min of Health soon disappeared from government after that letter. She exposed the corruption and harm.

Carter, the Harm, the inordinate number of deaths in Emerge is labeled Democide; large numbers of the public killed by government policy. This driver's Policy is illegal and they know that it kills and they continue on as Hate blinds them to our laws and Life. You're a Judge that's been involved in Crimes Against Humanity, what do we label people that do this?

*



Auditor General

By the way, the Auditor General has yet to respond to my questions about this; that was a year ago. How can the Auditor General support this Policy when the gov't has stated the 'implementation' of the Policy harms society? The Auditor General's Office previously wrote that it cannot address the fact the policy is illegal, harms, and offers no Good but only the 'implementation' of Policy, as to whether it works or not, compared to the Connection to Legality, Harm, and Good. How is the 'implementation' of an illegal policy, that is known to kill and maime, based upon the use of our taxes, a worthwhile 'implementation' of government Policy? Who threatened the Auditor General to not respond to this new inquiry? This double speak of the Auditor General has Connections, below, to Circle Games and Mind Games played out to deceive.

*



Seniors

Recently, the Office of the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles has singled out a very specific Class of People, Seniors, for their lust of Power, Prestige, Status, Money, and Criminally. With concern to this the NDP MLA, Nicholas Simons, stated the policy is illegal, not proved to be needed, the computer toy doing the Examination for the OSMV has not been Peer Reviewed for bona fide (ness), or proved to be able to do what it's alleged to be able to do, or proved to offer any Good. ( I wrote him a letter, it's included) The person running this Human Experiment on Seniors is the husband of the “academic researcher”, mentioned above, Dobbs, whom studies Seniors, who stole research, lied she had permission to use it, and falsified an Affidavit to mislead readers of her B C Human Rights Tribunal Presentation that she had permission for use, done to justify the BC Governments Diabetic Driver's Policy and to justify the Consequences. That's right, there never has been a Policy Paper justifying the Diabetes Driving Policy. And that's just for diabetes.

What's the Big Idea that labels someone like Dobbs for what she has done and is? A Fascist or Nazi “academic researcher”? They're allowed in Canada but I don't need to be quiet about it.

Dobbs sold herself for a guaranteed job with the BC Government and a pension, with the guarantee that if she did whatever they asked they would protect her. She did all this for some kind of twisted Prestige and Status and by doing so she corrupted World Standards of Science, the very Standards she uses to contrive her Status, Prestige, and Place within the Scientific community, however her power and status are perverted and corrupt. Dobbs broke the Trust of Government, the Social Contract of Trust, broke her Oath of Office, sent the material through the mail, which is mail fraud, and now she's involved in an Illegal, Unsanctioned Experiment on Humans; upon Seniors. I'm the Democrat and she's the Fascist or Nazi. The trouble is, in my “democratic society” of Canada, one can be a Fascist, Nazi, Communist, or Socialist, but that doesn't mean I cannot expose them for what they are, their criminal activity, their attack upon Canada, and her attack upon diabetics and now Seniors; her attack upon Humanity.

Again, Dobbs' stolen research was withdrawn from my 2008 – 2009 Discrimination complaint after I confronted Dobbs, the Solicitor General's Office, and the OSMV concerning this theft and breach of Affidavit and here she is again supporting lies, hate, bias, discrimination, prejudice, and bigotry and overtly supporting or maybe leading an unsanctioned, unmanaged Human Experiment against Seniors. There should be no doubt that, as Dobbs corrupted World Standards of Science, an Affidavit, and Trust any work she puts forward to support her husband and his computer toy, his illegal Human Experiment, or any work for the OSMV should be thoroughly scrutinized for legality, bona fide (ness), harm, and adherence to a Code of Ethics. He should be stopped immediately. She also needs to be stopped. Nazi Human Experiments, scary.

Carter, what the Dobbs' are doing, the Solicitor General's Office and the OSMV is doing, is a Human Experiment and only one death means their behaviour is Genocide, as they singled out “One” Class of People, a very specific Class of People, knowing the policy is illegal, not proved to be needed, not proved to be able to do what it alleges to be able to do, that it harms, and they have not acknowledged if the Seniors already visit a doctor for care. In other words they're Hunting Seniors for their own gain.

Secondly, they should have presented their Experiment to someone like the National Research Council of Canada for Evaluation that they are following the Standard Protocol for Human Experiments, or the Five Steps of Engagement listed below, with the acknowledgment of how they would accommodate and fulfill the Code of Ethics concerning Human Experiments.

Third, Dobbs researches or studies Seniors and knows what Social – Psychological influences have upon Seniors and that the Experiment her husband and she are now running for the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles, Martin, and the Deputy Superintendent, Howie, is exactly that; a Human Experiment. They're forcing their Procedure upon Seniors to Evaluate their Behaviour, which in turn is supposed to change their behaviour, which means they're running not only a Physical Experiment but a Psychological Experiment, which they say will prove some unknown need. They work through the Scientific Method of Experiments to feign legitimacy but mislead about the correctness of what they are doing.

Carter, the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles, Martin, last year at this time, attacked, assaulted, and denigrated my character in defense of his illegal diabetic policy and its consequences, so what's he going to do to Seniors that question his phoney, illegal Human Experiment and the death of their friends or partners due to the stress of being labeled as unfit and being forced to undergo a Psychological Examination?



All the points mentioned above, and more, are World Standards of Science and Humanity that Governments, Scientists, and an “academic researcher” need to fulfill before engaging in a Human Experiment. Dobbs, the S G Office, and the OSMV were not penalized for what they have done and continue to do to me, a diabetic and the disabled, and have realized Canada is afraid of them. This has lead to the escalation of their perverted, deviant, and criminal behaviour. They really have learned they can do what they are doing and people are afraid. Are you afraid of Fascists, Nazis, bullies, thugs, criminals, and murders? Do you believe they need to be exposed and challenged? Your Resume says you challenge monsters.

*

These are Seniors Bond, the Dobbs', Martin, and Howie are attacking, Seniors are protected in all Cultures or Societies; Cultural Icons. How have we become so dysfunctional? How is it that Solicitor General, Bond, can attack Seniors like she'd doing? How is it that people like the Dobbs' can attack Seniors like they're doing?

Connections, as with the diabetic policy and the other 99 medical conditions that are monitored, it must be remembered that they have not fulfilled the demands of the Charter, the HR Code, and the MVA in order for Government to make demands of the Public, and as they have not done this for diabetics and the other disabilities they believe they do not need to fulfill the laws of Canada in order to Go After, Hunt, Stock, and Experiment on Seniors.

Secondly, ICBC proved senior driver mishaps are lower than other driver mishap classes, as they have with diabetic drivers, so why this new senior policy? These facts are not acknowledged, done with the same corrupt Wrong – Thinking concerning my G P visits. The game played is don't acknowledge facts, therefore no one knows, present false accusations, therefore they can play their contrived Hunt of Seniors, another contrived Social Pariah that the Public needs protection from.

*

Big Ideas and Scale, these people really are the monsters of the Human Species. Your history proves you've met monsters like this and have confronted them for the betterment of Humanity. These people need exposing and an Amendment to your Report would help with this or we will not have Democracy as we know it, as these cowardly, incompetent, and corrupt Politicians and absolutely corrupt senior Public Servants are changing it by not fulfilling its demands.

Secondly, Democracy takes work to implement and establish, we always need to work as hard as we can to keep it, and that's why we have the Charter, HR Code, MVA, and Oaths of Office, the underpinnings of Democracy. These 100 medical conditions that are monitored by the OSMV may impact 80% of the population. This conscious breach, or forfeiting of Charter Rights, to do what they want, in opposition to the Demands and Objectives of the Charter, is no small matter.

Third, we will not have a UHCS that can cope with health and age changes in our “democratic society”, due to new and the increased expression of known medical conditions for whatever reason; the doubling of diabetes every ten years is an example and the bubble of the so called baby boomers is increasing the numbers again as seen through the Public's needs today.

Both User Groups of the UHCS need to be acknowledged, the Public and Government, and yet today the Government's demands are not. Government's demands will also be increasing, as the 100 monitored conditions today will see their levels increase due to age, known, and unknown reasons, therefore the Governments demands upon the UHCS and G Ps will skyrocket also, taking more and more G Ps out of service that are not acknowledged as a debit today, leaving what kind of care for Seniors that have no Value and Worth today, according to Bond, the Dobbs', Martin, Howie, and their colleagues. If they had Value and Worth Bond would work through the demands of the Charter, HR Code, and MVA.

Lastly, as the above really is happening what will become of your Recommendations for Seniors, as Senior's are already being abused, and the Solicitor General and the OSMV know the policy is illegal and harms and no one holds them accountable for their actions and the consequences, so they just continue on and add to their depravity?

Carter, they dream this stuff up and do it to fulfill there twisted perverted “view” of life. It's not Right, Legal, nor does it offer any Good. It's not Logical, Moral, or Ethical which is opposite to what I'm doing and your Recommendations offer. You really believe these people will seriously contemplate, accept, or even implement a non – government or non – senior Public Servant's ideas? You're the Watchdog, the Moral Authority, not their buddy and co – conspirator. You're their Enemy. Like I am. (When the gov't acknowledged they didn't have Science to justify the Diabetic Policy or the Harm, they stated the Policy is based upon their “view” of life. As Politicians and Public Servants they do not have a “view” of life to run Policy; they need to fulfill the demands of the Charter, HR Code, MVA, and their Oath of Office.)

Carter, you and I are so far outside these people's insanity and depravity they need to be exposed publicly for what they're doing. The diabetic Policy needs to be stopped. The Social – Psychological Experiment they're playing with Seniors is out of control and needs to be stopped.

*



From my enclosed letter; “Canada's Democide

large numbers of the public killed by government policy, and an illegal on at that”

The Social Psychological Experiments; Milgram Experiment, Jane Elliott's diversity training, and the Stanford Prison Experiment.



Milgram, 1961, on obedience to authority figures, “measured the willingness of study participants to obey an authority figure who instructed them to perform acts that conflicted with their personal conscience.” (wikipedia, milgram experiment)



Elliott, 1968, Blue eye/Brown eye Exercise, Elliott “exposes prejudice and bigotry for what it is, an irrational class system based upon arbitrary factors. Her teaching “exercise labels participants as inferior or superior based solely upon the color of their eyes and exposes them to the experience of being a minority.” (www.janeelliott.com)



Zimbardo, 1971, Stanford Prison experiment, volunteer students role playing as prison guards and prisoners, “...the participants adapted to their roles well beyond what even Zimbardo himself expected, leading the “Officers” to display authoritarian measures and ultimately to subject some of the prisoners to torture. In turn, many of the prisoners developed passive attitudes and accepted physical abuse, and, at the request of the guards, readily inflicted punishment on other prisoners who attempted to stop it. The experiment even affected Zimbardo himself, who in his capacity as “Prison Superintendent,” lost sight of his role as psychologist and permitted the abuse to continue as though it were a real prison. Five of the prisoners were upset enough by the process to quit the experiment early, and the entire experiment was abruptly stopped after only six days”. (Wikipedia)



Lastly, what were the American troops caught doing with Iraq prisoners of war? Some say Canadians in Afghanistan and Canadian troops in Somalia did the same thing? Same kind of stuff but real, not an experiment. What I have come to understand is I'm involved in the same corruption of our society except it is real; and reader you're involved to. This is what happened to Sinclair, in Manitoba, what Chief McCaskill is Investigating, a very real working example of the above, where people are killed, maimed, have their lives endangered, and experience the prejudice brought forward by the blue eyed/ brown eyed exercise, by those in power.

Martin is doing the harming, he is inflicting the pain and suffering. He is the stripping me, raping me, and he knows this. Martin knows he is wrong and yet he hasn't changed and if he doesn't know this is wrong then why doesn't he?

This brings psychopath and sociopath into this game of his.



Chief McCaskill, you and I are in a working example of the above. This is a Grand or Huge working example of the above studies of our behaviour, human behaviour. Your colleague that made contact with me is really shaken and is having a difficult time accepting what you and I have found ourselves within. They should be. I accepted their anonymity, as this is nasty, it is not a nightmare, something fiction, this is real and absolutely corrupt; they were asking for protection and I accepted their request. He or she is a good example of those that walk out of these kinds of experiments, if they are allowed to. I walked and was attacked and raped by Martin and turned into a Criminal. The town where Elliott did her blue eye/brown eye exercise on prejudice, bigotry, and racism hates her. Elliott is not welcome back. Chief, what's going to happen to you and your colleague? Look what just happened to me.

Chief McCaskill, you have access to psychologists and psychiatrists due to your position as Chief of Police, Winnipeg. They need to read and understand what is really happening with the diabetes policy and its consequences and its influence upon your Investigation. They need to expose how corrupt this is to you and your Investigation. The broken laws of our country; the Charter, the HR Code, the MVA in order to play this game of Control and Hate by the anti - diabetic lobby and anti - disabled lobby is astounding to say the least. The lies about the Policy being legal, the false documents, the lack of accountability and responsibility, stolen scientific research, the denial of doing so, the phoney Drafts, the breach of Trust, and the acts of Treason. And now, the new attack and rape upon me by Martin, all because I said NO. The absolute denial of what is happening by the Press, politicians, and the public figures I have contacted. They know there is something wrong and they are afraid. This also confronts their sensibilities about Canada, as it has your colleague.



Again, Martin knows he is wrong and yet he hasn't changed and if he doesn't know this is wrong then why doesn't he?



Martin's increased aggressiveness is part of the problem, his problem. He has escalated his deviant behaviour in order to harm, to keep me in my place even though I left the experiment, he wouldn't let me walk out. He's Harming me, no different than electrically shocking me, in Milgram, knowing he is harming me, as a “student” guard knowing his is beating and torturing me, Stanford Prison Experiment, and as a blue eyed/brown eyed person of difference, as the minority, all of whom are put into their place with learned deviant behaviour, which increases 'to what', if not confronted and exposed?

To death if allowed to continue. Martin has moved to a new phase, the attack upon the individual, personal harm, by assault and rape. What's next, Chief? What's next RCMP? What's next for your employee Solicitor General?

*



British Columbia, therefore Canada's Group – Think and Wrong – Thinking

Carter, you've challenged Group – Think and Wrong – Thinking coming from some Politicians and senior Public Servants, sociopaths, psychopaths, and monsters. As a non – Government person, as a private Person, Lawyer, and Judge evaluating Gov't activity you're their nemesis, or the moral echo they're leery of. An entity, that by default, has as it's underpinnings with the demands of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, the Human Rights Code, the Motor Vehicle Act, and Oaths of Office; Instruments and the underpinnings of Democracy.

These Instruments are here for Government and the Public Service to use for protection and fulfill before Government sticks its ugly face into my life. “Wrong – Thinking” is when these Instruments are not used by Gov't and its Public Servants.

“Right – Thinking” is when these Instruments are used, as that's why Critical Thinkers, Lawyer, Judges, bona fide Politicians, and Canadians invented these laws. These laws protect Politicians and Public Servants from their own bias, hate, prejudice, discrimination, bigotry, ignorance, indifference, stupidity, cowardice, and corruption. They also protect the Public from corrupt Politicians and Public Servants, and Lobbyists.

The people I've exposed have done the opposite of what these laws demand, which is a breach of their Oath of Office. Their behaviour is opposite to what Canada demands. They've put themselves above our Democracy. They've Wrongly put themselves above Canada, which is Treason.

They consciously and deliberately practice Group – Think and Wrong – Thinking. They've formed a Group for Power and Support and their Group – Think has become perverted, immoral, unethical, maybe amoral, illegal, and Wrong.

*

How do they implant and implement this Wrong – Thinking? They use their established bona fide Prestige, Status, Power, and Trust that comes with their position, as well as the power that comes through the Oath of Office they swore an Oath to obey. They take this pre – established Trust and twist it for their own gain. They use Wrong – Thinking to establish their new backward, flip flop position in gov't. They lie and misinform to contrive the diabetic as the Social Pariah. They've lied, falsify documents, stolen documents, falsified Crown documents, deceived, mislead, misinformed, and misrepresented as to what they are allowed to do, and threatened those whom challenge them. They set – up people of difference, lie about them, contrive and spread false accusations, discriminate; all done to establish a Class of People as the Pariah, something Society should fear, something with no Rights, therefore the Charter, the HR Code, and Rights under law, such as the MVA, do not apply to the Pariah. Their Wrong – Thinking is hidden due to established working protocol that the Public believes have been fulfilled, because these people have lied they have fulfilled the protocol, documents such as the “Notice of Prohibition” the Police and the OSMV use to cancel licenses are an example.

They lie that the Pariah needs to be managed at all cost, therefore niceties such as Laws do not need to be fulfilled for the Protection of Canada and the Public; which they've done.

Secondly, they lie when they profess that they've Rightly established this Class of People, diabetic and the disabled, as Pariahs, therefore not people and as non – Humans they do not have Charter Rights and Human Rights. Such as Politicians and senior Public Servants listed Canadian Women as non – Humans, therefore had no Rights less than a hundred years ago.

Third, these people have become Corrupt some how and it's only their Group – Think and Wrong – Thinking that supports their twisted anti – Social, anti – Democratic, and anti – Life behaviour. They've involved people and organizations to such a degree of commitment, of Wrong – Thinking, that now people are afraid of them because my letters to them have exposed the Truth about the Politicians and senior Public Servants and their corrupt policies and the horrific consequences. These manipulated and abused people and organizations are afraid because their naïve bystander status has now been compromised and due to fear, threats, and bullying chose to say nothing, hoping all will go away in their work/life time. These people and organizations and their Wrong – Thinking of self – preservation has also jeopardized our Charter, HR Code, MVA, and Canada. They've jeopardized Canada by turning their backs to corruption and Wrong – Thinking coming from Politicians and senior Public Servants, which only reinforces the Wrong – Thinking coming from those I'm exposing. ICBC is an example, as they have not acknowledged my letters or questions concerning the Policy and their behaviour toward me. Which begs the question; “What will they do for Seniors if they refuse the illegal Examination?”

*

For S G Bond, and past Solicitor General's, past Premier's, past Attorney General's, past Superintendent's of Motor Vehicles, SMV Martin, and Deputy SMV Howie and the Supervising Lawyer of the A G Office, Hunt, to pretend they're allowed to run illegal policy and it's the Public's Place to prove Wrong, exemplifies their Wrong – Thinking. It's their job , under their Oath of Office, to fulfill the demands of laws before making demands of the Public. It's an Old Game for corrupt gov't and its senior Public Servants to flip flop what is demanded of them, as they know the cost to the Public when challenging Gov't. This is the same Wrong – Thinking with the accusation of unfitness used against Seniors and me. The flip flop concerning the two public servants that sold insider information concerning the sale of BC Rail, after eight years of legal matters, paid for by my taxes, is an excellent example of the flip flop and the protection by Gov't to defend and protect their colleagues involved in corruption; it was interesting that the declaration of guilt happened just after the long time Premier, Campbell, resigned. That was only money. This is illegal policy, killing, and now a Human Experiment. The recent stonewalling and flip flop by the Winnipeg Police concerning the Sinclair death is also an excellent example of this corruption and Wrong – Thinking.

What I'm involved in is Wrong – Thinking to say the least. These people know this, and this is why they have stonewalled, falsified and stolen documents, attacked and assaulted me, and raped my character, etc, etc. They will apply their Wrong – Thinking to your Ideas and Recommendations, your Right – Thinking, as you have challenged them, as I have.

Carter, you and your ideas really are their enemy. It would be nice to see an Amendment of your Right – Thinking exposing their Group – Think and Wrong -Thinking for the betterment of Canada and Seniors.

*



An Amendment

As a Lawyer and Judge you know cases can be re – visited if new information is discovered concerning what the case is about and how the lack of information influenced the 'composed' Recommendations of one party, as compared to the 'contrived' disinformation coming from the other party, done to mislead; the gov't in this instance; DNA is the modern example of reopening a case. New information that gives or allows one to understand the case with a new perspective, which changes how the case should be seen if one party, the gov't, had been honest to you, as you collected information concerning government policy and its consequences concerning the UHCS and Seniors. Without knowing all demands upon the Public, the UHCS, G Ps, and taxes, Recommendations such as yours will not be realized, as the instruments of change, G Ps and taxes, used to implement those Recommendations are not really there, as the Government does not acknowledge its demands upon the Public, the UHCS, Seniors, and the consequences of those demands; therefore the needed instruments are not what they seem to be. The gov't ratios of Client/G P are skewed, as the availability of G Ps is not correct. As taxes are falsely used for non bona fide demands upon the UHCS and G Ps we must ask; “How many tax dollars are spent by gov't on illegal demands upon the UHCS?”

All your Recommendations will be evaluated for Want or Need and if need for Value, Worth, and Good if to be paid for by the UHCS. So, how is it that Bond, Martin, and Howie are able to run this illegal policy and it's want, with no Value, Worth, and Good? All paid by our taxes and debits our G P pool or body of G Ps up to 20% or more.

Secondly, take my inquiry into diabetes and driving, 2002 – present, as seniors also have diabetes and drive. This means Seniors with diabetes already see the G P for care, for an evaluation by a G P, this is not acknowledged, as my care is not. Seniors with any of the other 100 medical conditions the OMSV supposedly manages are also visiting the G P, and is this acknowledged? These people do not need to be involved in a Human Experiment being run by a corrupt “academic researcher”, Dobbs, also labeled as a “Dr”; but doctor of what? Dobbs and her husband need to be Examined.

An Amendment would expose this Wrong – Thinking about Seniors, define the bias, prejudice, and bigotry.

Third, the Ombudsman listened to my complaint concerning this illegal policy and the consequences and did not find fault with me. I have credibility and the Ombudsman acknowledged this. The gov't has fought hard to stonewall and bury their behaviour and here we are ten years later with the same illegal policy and the very same people that attacked me and diabetics with lies, stolen documents, a broken Affidavit, and breached Trust; these attacks prove my credibility. With no one else confronting them about their illegality, criminality, and amoral behaviour we see they have learned how powerful they are and how afraid society is of them to where they've escalated their deviant behaviour and are now attacking Seniors with lies and disinformation, as if its some kind of sport. The same people doing the same thing, at first blush, seems reasonable, as how can they carry on with new events if the old events were corrupt and unsanctioned. Carter, that's why people do not see this new corruption for what it is. They are the naïve bystander and Trust to much.

It's more than Morally and Ethically wrong, their behaviour runs against the Constitution, the B C Human Rights Code, and the Motor Vehicle Act. It's also belittles, diminishes, and denigrates Humanity and the Right to Life. We Need to fight for Humanity and the Right to Life at all cost; it's not a given. We need to fight for Democracy, as it's not a given. We need to fight for Seniors, as the Federal Government is doing with the use of TV and the Press. We need for fight for the future, as we live long enough to see what we will mature to be in twenty or thirty years. We fight for Seniors Today for our Future. These actions are Right – Thinking. This new assault upon a very specific Class of People by Wrong – Thinkers really needs to be exposed for what it is.

Government, us, needs to prove a need before it intervenes in the Public's life and we must acknowledge the consequences of our behaviour and the Solicitor General and those senior Public Servants in the OSMV do not accept they need to do this and yet the demands for such actions are there, written down for absolute direction, through our Charter, the HR Code, the MVA, and their Oath of Office. They act above the Law and an amendment would expose this.

They care nothing for Canada, Humanity, or the Right to Life. They care nothing for Seniors, as they pronounce and act as if Seniors have and are nothing of Worth, Value, or Good, just something that's dying and can be used for whatever purpose, such as units in a Human Experiment for the use of the Dobbs', Martin's, Howie's, and Bond's of the world. An Amendment from you may stop this Wrong – Thinking about Seniors and stop the Senior Abuse.

Fourth, as stated above, one of the consequences from the government's illegal behaviour, is the illegal debit upon G Ps to fulfill the illegal, phoney Driver's Medical Examinations. This demand comes from only one Government Ministry or department, the Solicitor General's Office or Office of the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles; it's the largest demand by any entity upon G Ps. Now think about all the Government Ministries or Departments that make demands upon the UHCS that are legal, (are they acknowledged?) and the illegal demands that are not acknowledged because of the illegality and lack of proven Good but known harm.

Not until All demands upon the UHCS, both Public and Government, and their consequences are acknowledged will we have any hope of offering bona fide medical service to the Public, little lone to the growing body of Seniors.

An Amendment from the Ombudsperson exposing this Inequality would help correct this, at least make aware to the Public of the misinformation coming from government concerning demands upon the Public and the UHCS, as the Government only acknowledges the Public's demands and not theirs and of course not the consequences.

Isn't that the Aim, Goal, or Mandate of the Ombudsperson to make all information, concerning such a Big Idea as our Universal Health Care System, available to both parties in order to make informed decisions? Isn't the Ombudsperson the 'protected Third Party' that's used or needed to resolve an argument or problem? You would only be obeying the Law, the Aim or Mandate of the Ombudsperson by offering an Amendment that acknowledges All wants, needs, demands, and their consequences, of the Two User Groups of the UHCS, the Government and Public. Balancing the 'Scale of Use', is important, as the Balance Scale is loaded against the Public today.

Warning

Carter, again, as I've recently been attacked by government for exposing them you really should consider what will happen to you if you decide to compose an Amendment, especially as I see your contract is over soon and you may be looking for work. Doors may be closed to you and your mental health challenged as mine was; the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles, Steve Martin, falsified legal documents in order to harm me and he stated I was unfit, therefore ICBC, at his command, cancelled my license and I was informed I would need to appear in front of a Review Board to explain my unfitness and what I had done to rectify the problem, this intentional harm also cancelled my license for an indefinite time. Nothing happened to him for doing so. (The March 08, 2011 letter that instigated the attack and my response to it are included, April 20, 2011.) The Winnipeg Chief of Police also attacked me, trying to find me unfit, after receiving the enclosed letters, which also exposed gov't corruption impacting the Sinclair killing. Being a diabetic, turned into a pariah by government, and having experienced their lies and criminal behaviour over the past ten years and have the above happen is not a very nice thing to experience.

So, I guess it really comes down to what kind of Canada do you really want and what value and worth comes from exposing corruption, standing up for Democracy, Life, and Seniors. To me, you've already done so with your Report. And if they kill you, like I worry about for myself, you won't need to worry about anything anymore; a positive thing about that is, at least you'll know who killed you and it won't be some unknown cancer or death in an Overcrowded Emerge.

*



Connections and Context

I thought about your report for Seniors and made connections to some really nasty things you do not understand are happening and they will block your Recommendations, as the corruption is entrenched in Government and its senior Public Servants' thinking and behaviour; it's Group – Think and it has a very nasty vision for Canada. It's deep, widespread, and far fetching with it's negative, unexplained influences having us wonder why some of our Universal Health Care System departments are failing. These failures deny bona fide medical care for seniors who really need to be independent, self – managing, and have dignity in their closing years to be successful, which means Good health. A Big Idea that brings us together is that Seniors have a Right to Life, as I do, and they need to be protected by the Charter, the HR Code, and the MVA, as sometimes they are needy and vulnerable; it's just a stage of Life and the Politicians and it's senior Public Servants know this and play the negatives to instill fear. They fail to make the Connections needed to realize they'll also be Seniors. Which means they do not build Context, to understand they will be attacking themselves with their illegal policies and Human Experiments in a few years. And we're supposed to follow this insane, incompetent, incomprehensible Group – Think, Wrong – Thinking of these Politicians, senior Public Servants, and a corrupt “academic researcher” and her husband? Bullshit. No one needs to follow these psychopaths, sociopaths, and sadists. Sadists as they are harming people.

*

I've not read the Report but your Recommendations will be widespread, touching many departments of government, non – government organizations, and the UHCS; in other words, you Dream, Think, and Acknowledge Scale, Big Ideas, Connections, and Context. I also think and work through Scale and that means both our presentations will overlap, in government Ministries, departments, taxes, levels of age, disease, Charter and Human Rights, and Rights under the MVA. You have seen a Big Idea of Life and work toward it, Inclusion and Equality for all in Canada.

I read your online Resume. You're a lawyer, involved in Human Rights, Rights to Life, defending Humanity, Laws of a country and Laws of Humanity. You've experienced Genocide, a society run amuck. You were involved in the Somalia inquiry, Canadians looking at ourselves and what we really do, which can be really difficult. Some say Afghanistan too. But not all of us, just a few have run amuck, but their damage is terrible and unacceptable.

That's what I'm involved in; the Scale may be just ten or twenty absolutely corrupt Politicians and fifty to seventy senior Public Servants and their twisted “view” of life, which is killing and maiming at a frightful rate, such that Emerge doctors call Press Conferences concerning this phenomenon. This killing is swept under the table so to speak, as its not the military or one mass murderer on a pig farm, its white collar workers that have sworn an Oath of Office to not kill, harm, lie, steal, mislead, misdirect, misinform, etc, etc and yet they've done it all. Big Ideas, Scale, and Connections to Ministry to Ministry must be made to realize Context to see how the illegal polices play out, but when put together we realize how we are mislead to believe all is bona fide and acceptable, where in Fact it is not.

What I'm involved in and exposing is more than really nasty. They've played your Office also, as I've not heard about the illegal policies and the consequences being acknowledged in the Press concerning their influences upon the Report. My inquiry and human rights complaints involves white collar workers, white as in culturally nice and clean and beyond approach, but actually it concerns their bias, hate, prejudice, discrimination, and bigotry. It comes from and is supported by corrupt, incompetent, and cowardly Politicians and absolutely corrupt senior Public Servants in denial of what they are doing.

What I'm also involved in and exposing is what we're doing to ourselves by not confronting 'them' and 'their' actions. This is why the gov't has stonewalled and threatened people involved in this; some people become afraid when they look at themselves, when they see the horror they're involved in; they deny and turn their backs. How else do we explain the events I've found myself within? Big Ideas, Scale, Connections and Context need to be acknowledged and played through to understand the corruption or the same will apply to Seniors and your Recommendations and you'll wonder why nothing is happening.

*

Again for a Big Idea, I see your term of office ends this May 15 and you'll be off to another adventure but hopefully you write an Amendment, even though this will pass this on to your successor, but at least you've brought forward information to balance off the Scale of demands upon the UHCS, where we can then see where all our medical resources are being used. 20% of G Ps are now lost as they're filling out forms for gov't, which will only increase as society ages. What percent will this turn into if gov't demands are not evaluated, as the Public's demands are and changes not made?

Seniors do not wait 5 – 7 days to see a G P now, what's it going to be in the future? I didn't wait this timeline for my parents, my wife's parents, my sick kids. My purpose is to expose you to this corruption, as how are the Recommendations of the Report going to be implemented if only the Public's demands upon the UHCS are acknowledged, where the Government's demands are illegal, not acknowledged, and taxes shuffled around to pay for their demand.

Carter, what's that kind of deceptive action called? Where numerous Ministries are involved to cover up the shuffle of taxes to pay for illegal government demands upon the Public and UHCS in an effort to cover up the killing and maiming in Emerge? The second step of this contrivance is to have the Public believe the policy as legal, as why would the Government shuffle taxes to pay for a Policy and its Driver's Medical Examination if the policy was not legal.

It took a lot of work and multiple Ministries to contrive that charade. It's a Big Idea, there's Scale, and Connections to Ministries that are needed to understand Context; contriving illegal actions to bury illegal activity and horrific consequences is a lot of work. Criminality begs criminal activity to cover it up.



But this isn't just criminal behaviour is it? There's another Big Idea here, they've engaged in criminal behaviour against the Demands and Objectives of the Crown, the Government itself. Doesn't this action define Treason? Government officials running policy against the demands and objectives of the Crown is Treason; running this for their own benefit.

A second charade concerning the same people and Policy; the breaking a of Crown Settlement agreement and playing a charade to mislead that it had been renewed or had an Amendment made to it and all is well. The Connection sees the Attorney General's Office, Hunt, its supervising lawyer, involved in implementing, supporting, and covering up policy which is running against the demands and objectives of the Crown. Hunt contrived and played out the charade concerning the breached Settlement Agreement and the phoney declaration that it had been revised or amended. When I complained about this charade to the Attorney General, her colleague in the A G's Office, refused to explain why she was defending the illegal Policy, its consequences, and her charade to cover up the breach. I complained to the Attorney General about the phoney response from his Senior Assistant and queried whether or not this man could read a ten page letter and answer the questions. Ten pages, as one can't just say Hunt's corrupt; a story was offered, which he could confirm or not. He did not ask me for documents as he knew I was Right, my argument Just, and Hunt was not offering anything Good. She was lying about what she was doing and had done.

Connections for Context. The A G at that time, Oppal, a former lawyer and judge, refused to get involved and told me to get a lawyer. He buried this. To charge someone with Treason I believe only the A G can do this. Do you really think an A G will charge his legal colleagues and Political partners with Treason? These are the same people that brought

B C eight years of stonewalling concerning the selling of insider information about the sale of B C Rail and the breach of Oath of Office from doing so.

These people are the same people who refused to allocate funds concerning the Pig Farm killing investigation and the investigation into the Highway of Tears killings and disappearance of women. This former Politician is now running an Investigation or Inquiry into the disappearance of East End women and the process of that investigation, some were killed on the Pig Farm, and he buried this government drivers' policy knowing it's illegal, harmed, and that the government itself broke their Crown Settlement Agreement and his senior staff member played a charade to cover it up. What kind of Big Idea is that? The hypocrisy for him to be doing this is revolting and unexplainable other than his colleagues giving him a job for doing what they needed to be done.

Carter, no one can make this stuff up. And you're working for Equality and Inclusion for Seniors. People without a voice. The Big Ideas are Corruption and Treason. The A G and his staff knew the policy was illegal and killed and they turned their backs to it. What's that make them?

*

First, again, if you write about this you may be attacked, assaulted, and have your character raped, as happened to me. Steve Martin, the SMV, still has his job after falsifying legal documents, done in order to have ICBC cancel my license, in his personal attack and assault upon me. He also falsified documents to fraudulently have the “Notice of Prohibition” seem to have legal tender, so the Police and ICBC use it to cancel or confiscate licenses; the Sections of the MVA he uses to cancel licenses have not been fulfilled, as he states on the Notice. Connections; once the lies begin they never stop and they know they've gone to far and just weave more complex lies to hide the others or the new illegal activity.

You're a lawyer, falsifying documents is what? Falsifying documents to harm someone is what? Using your government position to hide a personal attack is what? A breach of his Oath of Office to begin with. He used his government position in a charade to act out his personal attack of revenge, as I again exposed his illegal policy and its harm to a new contact, ICBC, in my fight for my Charter and Human Rights, and Rights under the MVA. ICBC now knows the disabled drivers' policy, the diabetic policy, really is illegal and its “Notice of Prohibition” used to cancel licenses is illegal, it does not have legal tender, as Martin falsified documents when contriving the Notice of Prohibition, as he stated the disabled policies were legal knowing he had not fulfilled the demands of the MVA, sections 25 and 29, the sections he quotes as giving him the power to do what he's doing.

The RCMP also now know this “Notice of Prohibition” is illegal and yet they still continue to use it and have denied they can do anything about it. Imagine how many licenses they've cancelled under fraudulent circumstances. How many cancelled now after knowing the “Notice of Prohibition” is a fraud or counterfeiting. Counterfeiting Crown documents is what?

The Notice was renewed in 2008, during my third Discrimination Complaint, where Martin knew he did not have any Science to justify the policy, as I had just Deconstructed the stolen research he presented in the BC HRT complaint, where he had to withdraw the material and yet he still stated he had fulfilled the demands of the MVA listed on the “Notice of Prohibition”. Connections and Context. Martin did not do this by himself. His colleagues in criminality and corruption also protected him. The legal advice to go ahead with this falsification of the Notice must have come from his boss, the Solicitor General and the Attorney General's Office, as they would also protect him. As exemplified by the protection that came to protect him after his attack upon me.

Nothing was done to challenge Martin, which would make the Policy and attack Public, and what would the consequences of that be? What would Public knowledge of his illegal “Notice of Prohibition”, his illegal diabetic policy, his threat to ICBC, his attack upon me, his falsification of documents etc, etc, do to Government?

This makes one ask;

“How many licenses were illegally cancelled though his illegal “Notice of Prohibition”?” and “What would this cost gov't if people knew of this and sued?” and “How many people in government were involved in this falsification of the “Notice of Prohibition”?” and “What is ICBC to do now it knows the “Notice of Prohibition” and the Diabetic Policy is illegal?” and “What are the RCMP and other police going to do with the knowledge the “Notice of Prohibition” is illegal?”

Nothing will be done by ICBC, the RCMP, and Gov't as the killing and corruption is too Grand, involves too many Politicians and too many Ministries, and those I've contacted are afraid and now that they've All buried this they will not bring it forward in the future. But that's not absolutely true is it. I'm still here. You're where you are. Someone stood up and controlled the damage and allowed me to file for a new license. And they haven't killed me yet.

Do you really think these people will accept your complaints? Your Recommendations, like mine, really are complaints and look what's happened to me. I think you really need to write an Amendment because just the thought of reprisals is good enough to expose those causing the worry. Let them explain themselves.

*

Carter, the co – authored letter from the Ministry of Health and the Solicitor General's Office, where they admit the policy is not supported by any Science and they know of the harm, means the senior Public Servants in the Min of Health have also turned their backs on the killing in Emerge and long wait – times for surgery. Big Ideas, Scale, Connections, and Context. However, the harm is worse than the harm realized by the fact we know these people are also aware of the illegal policy and its consequences and they work in Emerge and late surgeries. Are you still in denial that this is happening? It should be a hard thing to get our minds around these Facts, because it really is Corruption and nasty.

Connections. What this really means is that the people running this, Bond, Martin, Howie, and others have balanced off the killing they know they're doing in Emerge, Ambulances, and through surgery wait – times as acceptable, (they've acknowledge this Harm, it's a Fact), and this killing is then compared to the killing they believe diabetic and disabled drivers are doing, (Fiction). We are not allowed to kill. Government is not allowed to kill. We're allowed to balance off killing? Bullshit. Government is banned from State Sanctioned killings. This gov't killing is no different than Capital Punishment; capital punishment is known to kill, as is the illegal policy the Government and senior Public Servants admit to. There is planning involved in both kinds of killings. There is acknowledgment of harm. One's in a jail and the other in an Overcrowded Emerge, in an Ambulance waiting to drop of to an Overcrowded Emerge, or someone waiting for surgery. The gov't has bloody hands from their sanctioned killing coming from their illegal policies.

Big Idea. Fact, neither the S G Office, the OSMV, or the Min of Health offered any documents to justify the lies concerning disabled drivers kill more people than non – disabled drivers, therefore legalizing the policy and its consequences. Dobbs' stolen research did not include such a study or research to justify this false accusation and she presented 180 stolen articles. I say articles as her collection was not just bona fide Scientific studies, peer reviewed research and some not, but articles on diabetes and driving and some I did not know why they were there. I believe she presented almost all research done concerning diabetes and driving whether they were on task or not. I believe she used everything and anything that had the word diabetes in the title, abstract, or body of the work. Connections need to be made to the task at hand, volume does not mean credibility, it's used to bamboozle the reader with supposed Scientific information, only to mislead as to the legality of their actions. One believes Dobbs' 'authority' or 'expertise' due to her Status, as “academic researcher” and the Government's title of “Dr.”, but she had never studied or researched diabetes or diabetes and driving. She's not a Medical Doctor but a doctor of misinformation, just doing what all her colleagues are doing. She was never penalized for this. The Attorney General's Office protected her, as Hunt protected the breach Settlement Agreement and Policy and the A G buried my complaint about Hunt and the Policy.

There are Connections to be made here. This means these corrupt Politicians and senior Public Servants run Policy that kills and no one intervenes except me, so what have they learned?

This means these Politicians and senior Public Servants know they can run another illegal policy and if people are killed they'll get away with it again. They've learned this.

This means the attack upon Seniors and the resulting harms through this new driving policy, the Human Experiment by the Dobbs', by the same Politicians and the senior Public Servants, will be balanced off somehow. By once again turning a selected Class of People into the Social Pariah, as has been done with diabetics, the lies concerning Senior driver mishaps are now oozing from those in the OSMV, and Politicians, and yet denied by the Press. The Wrong – Thinking introduces the forfeiting of Senior Rights under the Charter, HR Code, and the MVA, as it done with diabetics and the disabled. Again breaching their Oaths of Office with their Wrong – Thinking.

This means the killing of Seniors through this new driving policy, (a Fact soon to be made Public by the survivors of those killed), through the Human Experiment by the Dobbs', the Politicians and the senior Public Servants, will be accepted and compared to those killed by Senior drivers, (Fiction). As they have learned to do with the diabetic driver.

Carter, what do you label people like this? This is not War. This is not War where Rights are suspended or forfeited. They do not have the Right to balance off their killing by some unproved declaration concerning lies about the disabled and Seniors. It's the opposite action that should be taking place; their action is another example of their flip flop process of defense. We should, as your Report is doing, be working as hard as we can not to take lives, which means the Government prove its demands upon the Public are bona fide and there is no Harm.

*



Bond, a Politician, a naïve bystander?

Big Idea. Bond, the eighth or so Solicitor General, in as many years, knows this policy is illegal, knows of the harm, and that Martin attacked me. Bond also knows that Martin broke the Crown Settlement Agreement that I agreed to, that I had been offered by Government to settle out of court, concerning my first Human Rights Discrimination complaint; that was 2006 and the Settlement Agreement has not been amended nor rewritten or has the policy been legalized. Bond knows all this and yet lied to me recently when I complained about Martin, his attack, and the illegal policy. Bond works in the most corrupt Ministry in Government, which also makes the greatest demand upon the UHCS of all Ministry's or Departments or any other entity making demands upon the UHCS and Doctors for no bona fide reason.

Her history informs us that she's been involved in this Policy for years, meaning by default she knows and has been active in supporting this illegal policy and its cover up; she also knows of the killing and maiming. She was the Minister of Transportation, Minister of Education, Minister of Health Care, Deputy Premier, Vice – Chair of the Treasury Board, chairs the Cabinet committee on New Relationship Coordination and a member of the Cabinet Climate Action Committee, and now the actual Ministry breaking the Law and killing the Public; Ministries and departments needed to be involved in order to run this illegal policy, hide its consequences, and to pay for the DME; maybe she's the director of all this; the Gang Boss; there always needs to be a Boss.

Bond is in denial of what she is doing and she will not change her illegal demands upon the Public, UHCS, and G Ps, which would have an enormous benefit not only for Seniors, the Public, and the UHCS, but for Canada. As she won't change, as she is now corrupt, your Recommendations will not be forwarded for recommendation, as to begin with there are not the number of G Ps available, as 20% or more are used for Bond's illegal policy. How many more for Bond's Ministry? How many for Government in total and won't all other Ministers lie about their demands? Do you think Bond will relinquish this Power over diabetics, the disabled, the UHCS, other ministries, and real Doctors? And now Seniors?

Bond is not the naïve bystander, as she feigns to be, as exemplified with her chirp that she didn't know the RCMP will receive a pay increase with the signing of a new contract for RCMP service in B C. It was a silly little lie wasn't it. But the lie exemplifies her self surety in what she's doing. The question from the Press was just another senseless, boring, manipulative, stupid question from a Reporter trying to make NEWS to report. But the little lie popped out with clarity of condescension that shows absolute control of body and presence of mind. Interesting what little lies tell us.

Yah, Bond knows of the illegal Policy and the killing, the breached Settlement Agreement and the charades to cover it up, the illegal shuffle of taxes to pay for the DME, and she knows of the Nazi Scientists that stole the research and are now running the Human Experiment and forthcoming killing of Seniors due to this illegal Policy.

Bond is not the nice old lady that's selling her car and saying it's just been driven to work, where in fact she drives the heck out of it as soon as witness' have turned their backs. No, Bond is not a naïve bystander but a very active player in this Treason and Democide.

*

Connections and Context plus Big Ideas. Again, the Supervising lawyer for the Attorney General's Office, Hunt, played a charade to cover – up the breach of the Settlement Agreement. She also knows this policy is illegal and harms and she contrived a charade to make it seem as if the broken settlement had been Amended and that the diabetic policy is legal. I challenged her by asking the Attorney General to investigate her little charade and her support for the illegal policy and was told to get a lawyer. This is the same government lawyer that brought us eight years of stonewalling concerning the now criminal public servants who sold insider information to a private firm considering the sale of B C Rail. That cost taxpayers eighteen million dollars plus the cost of the RCMP; they declared their guilt almost the same time Premier Campbell declared he was retiring. The breach of my Settlement Agreement and denial of government corruption was happening at the same time; Hunt was also covering up the illegal diabetic policy and its cost upon society.

Secondly, Hunt's behaviour is more than playing a charade to cover up a breached Crown Settlement Agreement with the Public. She's running a policy in Opposition to the Demands and Objectives of the Crown, she went to great lengths to mislead, misrepresent, and misinform about her actions and those of government, as they are running their own policy, something against the Demands and Objectives of the Crown, which means their actions are Treason. Interesting isn't it. And you really think they will listen to you after you've exposed them for their incompetencies and poor thinking? Recommendations coming from a Lawyer, a Judge, a Military Person who by default defends Canada, and a defender of Government? They'll try to bury any Amendment you write as the Attorney General's Office is also corrupt.

These people are absolutely corrupt and will not share their Power with an Outsider such as the Ombudsperson, which exemplifies fair play, honesty, approachability, accommodation, and compromise, all done to make our “democratic society” really work, as intended by the Charter, HR Code, MVA, and Oaths of Office.

*

Big Idea. Again, Bonnie Dobbs, an “academic researcher”, sometimes titled “Dr.”, was hired by the Solicitor General's Office and the OSMV, Martin and Howie, to legalize the diabetic policy at any cost. She consciously stole Science, a few books, numerous articles, where most would be protected by “Copyright”, “Intellectual Property Rights”, and “Intent of Use” protection devices, put this material in an Affidavit and presented it as bona fide, or as having legal permission to use the material to legally justify an illegal foreign government's Social Policy; foreign policy as almost All the research and other articles came from outside Canada. By doing so she consciously corrupted World Standards of Science, World Standards of “Dr.”ing, the Trust of Public Service, the Trust of an Affidavit, and she corrupted the Trust of our Social Contract. As a gov't employee she also broke her Oath of Office. Plus what ever comes from misleading that she fulfilled the demands of the Charter, HR Code, and MVA, therefore justifying her behaviour.

All this was consciously done for Status, Money, twisted and perverted Prestige, Power, and a guaranteed job with gov't and a pension. I challenged her with a Deconstruction of her presentation and Martin and Howie withdrew the presentation. (It's included) That's why the policy is still illegal today. And yet, the BC HRT did not acknowledge this theft or the withdrawal of the Science, which means the gov't withdrew its defense of it actions. Therefore, the BC HRT should have found the policy not defended and found the policy to be Discriminatory and cancelled the policy immediately, due to withdrawal of any proof of Need. It should have been cancelled due to the fact the gov't stated it knew the policy harms.

Canceled until further notice until if and when the Gov't proved a need, no harm, and there was Good. Why didn't the HRT cancel the policy? Why did they give the gov't an unspecified timeline to continue with the policy knowing it had just stolen documents in an effort to justify the policy, knowing I had Deconstructed the presentation proving there is no Science to justify the policy, knowing a real Medical Doctor, a G P, employed by the Min of Health, also acknowledged no Science to justify the policy, little lone the harm the gov't was doing?

Did the Gov't threaten the BC HRT, as Martin not only threatened me but acted upon the threat? As ICBC must have been threatened. All of the gov't responses have been contrived to cover up their illegal policies and the harm it does to the UHCS and the Public. All played out because I've exposed their deviant, corrupt, perverted, and criminal behaviour. And now the Ombudsperson has done the same; you've exposed their incompetences and now you're learning the 'why' of that.

Carter, the above is worthwhile to know, it's a very Good Connection to what you are trying to do and what those that will be trying to implement your Recommendations will run into and not know the 'why' of the walls they've run into. They need to know what has happened and is still happening to me and the other 430 000 diabetics, little lone all the other people with diseases or medical conditions the incompetent, cowardly, and corrupt Politicians, absolutely corrupt senior Public Servants, and corrupt “academic researchers” say they're monitoring for the betterment of our “democratic society”.

Big Idea. I know I do go on about these people being “incompetent, cowardly, ...” but these people are just people and need to be ripped off the pedestals they have put themselves upon. We cannot do this unless we acknowledge that they are just people and have denigrated the Icons of Politician and senior Public Servants and really have broke the Public Trust.



These illegal disabled policies already impact seniors, which exemplifies the callousness of how these Politicians and senior Public Servants already treat Seniors, as the Senior care for their conditions is not acknowledged. How do we change this illegal attack and Human Experiment if not through exposure in the Public Place?

Carter, one cannot make this kind of stuff up. It all happened, is ongoing, and worsening, and that's why your Office was asked for a Report; sometimes the best thing to do is get someone on the “Outside” to look “Inside”, which informs me there are Good people in Government and they will support an Amendment, maybe that's all they need to take this on themselves.

Big Idea. An Amendment would allow those just mentioned to know who their real enemies are. It's hard to restructure and work for the future when some of your colleagues are covertly working against you. It's always nice to know who your enemies are. You are not their enemy neither am I.

However, I looked “Inside” Twice and look what happened to me. For your information I wrote Three Amendments for the OSMV. The OSMV asked me to Review the Policy Papers they were writing to justify the Policy; one of promises to entice me to cancel the BC HRT Discrimination complaint with a Settlement Agreement with the Crown; the implication was a Review of the Policy to see if it was needed. It was just stonewalling as they had all the information I had and knew the Policy was not needed but if one is to be involved in Change one must contribute.

I Deconstructed what was sent to me; a Draft, then a Policy, then another Draft. It was just noise; I confronted their horrific language used to contrive fear concerning the diabetic, there was nothing to justify the Policy, nothing to say the Intervention could do anything, nothing about the consequences, nothing to acknowledge that diabetics do care for themselves, and no names of those idiots that wrote the so called Policy Papers. I sign my letters, you sign your letters, so why not the authors of the so called Policy Papers? Who were they? Dobbs practicing on me? Practicing writing propaganda papers? No authors means they have no credibility to justify what was written. Or did they had someone steal Policy Papers from some one else, as Dobbs did, so we know they're liars and thieves. I have yet to receive the promised Policy Paper, which was promised in early 2007. My third BC HRT complaint, written up in February 2009, also promised a Policy Paper.

Carter, now you have some new Facts from a bona fide “Outsider”, who's complaints and question changed Policy, the fee change, that also wrote Amendments to their Draft, and Policy, and Draft, and nothing came of it, which forces us to ask; “Was their Request of the Ombudsperson just a charade by these people to deceive again; like they did with me concerning their requests for Ideas coming from a Review of their Draft of a Policy Paper? These Politicians and Senior Public Servants really are corrupt Carter. They really are Monsters.

*



Recent Foopaws by Bond and the new Minister of Health; “Law”, “Change”, and “Thinking” is beyond them

Again, Solicitor General Bond recently renewed a contract with the RCMP for policing within B C. However, it seems that some cities and townships are not happy with pay increases that will come through this contract. Bond stated she didn't know of these increases. The little lie. However, Bond's either lying or not informed. By default, she should be fired for lying, as it's not believable that she does not know what's in such a Contract; through illiteracy or not. It's her job to know what's in Contracts; lying breaches her Oath of Office and lies beget lies. Her history in Gov't means she can read and knows of Contracts. By default she should be fired for not knowing what she is doing, not being informed is no excuse for signing Contracts blindly. She should forced to leave her job as I demanded of her for running this illegal policy, not telling the truth about the breached Settlement Agreement, and Martin's attack upon me; these are big lies.

Being naïve is not acceptable, being illiterate is ok but not naïvety, not being informed about what she's signing is not acceptable, which means her staff read the Contract, accepted it, and in order to protect the Solicitor General did not inform her of the increases and just told her to sign; this means they manipulated her. These are the same corrupt staff that have been running the Solicitor General's Office for the past ten years, for the past seven or eight Solicitor General's and know of the illegal polices and harm and write letters for the Solicitor General and the Office. She plays the naïvety card to cover up her corruption. She played the naïvety card concerning the illegal policy and breached Settlement Agreement and Martin's attack upon me. Bond's corrupt behaviour is the same as Martin and Howie's denial of what they are doing, once a liar always a liar. They're all into this and it's too deep to change. Competency, accountability, and responsibility are Big Ideas and they show none. The Gang protects its members.

Big Idea and Connections. Dobbs also knows the RCMP know the Policy is illegal and that the “Notice of Prohibition” is an illegal document; “What did this mean in the negotiations for a renewed Contract and pay increases?”

If you were the RCMP would you play that card? Interesting eh. This is all so corrupt we should not believe this Big Idea did not play out. Would this be Blackmail or just Negotiations? The RCMP know Bond is corrupt.

Context, do you really think Bond will acknowledge what her Office is doing and allow G Ps for Seniors, as she and her staff have already turned the Senior into a Social Pariah with this phoney driving policy?

*

The new Minister of Health, de Jong, a lawyer, past Attorney General, is now playing the Moral Authority by stating anesthesiologists are “unethical” due to their recent confrontation with the Ministry of Health. (local TV, March 28, 2012) I wrote de Jong concerning all this, when he was the Attorney General, so he knows how unethical his lawyers are, how unethical his senior Public Servants are, how unethical his colleague, Bond and her senior Public Servants are, etc, etc. He refused to respond to my letters, which was expected, but it defines him doesn't it. He's Unethical, immoral, or amoral to turn his back on this and then a few years later attack Real Medical Doctors with charges of immorality. He did not state these bona fide Doctors broke their Code of Ethics, or broke the demands of the Charter, the HR Code, or an Oath of Office or that they were killing and maiming people; not like his Professional colleagues and Government colleagues.

I know I'm not supposed to offer an opinion but it's Time. I don't think this guy could run a cake sale for the Hospital Auxiliary, (and they're not easy things to run) little lone manage the Ministry of Health.

Carter, do you really think this guy, playing the Moral Authority, will entertain your Recommendations? Do you really think he'll confront his colleague, Bond, about her illegal demands upon the UHCS? Do you really think he'll confront his colleague, Bond, about her illegal demands upon the G Ps and Seniors? Do you really think he'll confront his senior Public Servants about the illegal policies and their consequences that they've acknowledged and how they condoned them?

Competency, accountability, and responsibility are Big Ideas again. Connections, Scale, and Context are needed. The Gang protects its members.

Do you really think this guy will acknowledge your Recommendations; coming from a Female Lawyer, a Female Judge, a Female Judge who takes on Monsters, which so far have been men, a Female Military Person who by default defends Canada, and a defender of Government?

*



The new corruption against Seniors

Recently I saw on TV that Dobbs and her husband are attacking Seniors with an unproven, illegal, amoral, Social – Psychological Examination; a real Human Experiment, but disguised as a bona fide Social Policy. Why wasn't Dobbs fired for stealing research, breaching an Affidavit, lying, and breaching Trust? Corruption is the answer. No different than gangsters defending each other for their illegal and anti – social behaviour. The illegal behaviour binds them together; once in one holds the line, and one is never allowed out. How's that for another interesting Connection and Context.



Carter, as a Lawyer, Judge, and Critical Thinker would you have accepted the above mentioned Scientific and Research material that Dobbs presented as being bona fide for use?

Sure you would, absolutely, as there are safeguards and look whom it came from; the Attorney General's Supervising lawyer, the Solicitor General, the Superintendent and Deputy Superintendent of Motor Vehicles, Heenan Blaikie's Human Rights Lawyer, a law firm in Alberta who stamped the material as bona fide for use within the Trust of Affidavit, and Dobbs, an academic researcher hired by the B C Government, all done in an effort to justify their illegal diabetic drivers' policy and presented within the legal status of the BC Human Rights Tribunal. You should believe due to the established Trust of these entities.

Carter, I knew there something wrong with Dobbs presentation but as a Trustworthy person I found it hard to believe that All this was stolen and an Affidavit broken. One does not believe it, and yet I knew the Policy was illegal, the DME could not do what it was alleged to be able to do, I knew there was no Science to justify the Policy, and it was based upon their “view” of life, and their “view” of life is not acceptable in Canada. Connections needed to be made to this new charade as the Presentation came immediately after I lodged another BC HRT complaint; the Presentation was already there, it was ready to be played and was. Carter, I remembered these people were Bullshitters, full of air and noise, and did not respect or comply with the law, and wondered what they were now Bullshitting about, then I realized something was missing, 10 000 pages of Copyright and Intellectual Permission Forms, and Intent of Use Forms. I knew I was again being abused and the laws of Canada and the World had again been abused.

I challenged the presentation, Deconstructed it with a Response and the Dobbs' presentation was withdrawn. What does that inform you of these people? It informs us that Dobbs did not do this by herself. These same people will do this to Seniors. Dobbs and her husband, Bond, Martin, and Howie are doing it already; lying, covering it up, supporting each other, and denying accountability.

If I had accepted Dobbs Response to my Complaint you would have read the Policy had been legalized by Dobbs' presentation in my discrimination complaint; you don't read that. You read that the BC Human Rights Tribunal gave the gov't more time to justify the policy, therefore, supposedly justifying the killing and maiming coming from the consequences of the policy. Why should anyone believe what they say and present about Seniors?

*

The BC HRT failed in its Aim, Goal, and Mandate to fight Discrimination. Were they also threatened by Martin and his colleagues of Wrong – Thinking?

ICBC has not responded to my questions regarding the illegal policy and their behaviour; how I was treated by them, after knowing the policy was illegal and after I had fulfilled the demand of Martin to complete a new Drivers' Medical Examination, where Martin would not allow ICBC to return my license. Were they also threatened by Martin and his colleagues of Wrong – Thinking?

I should have been given a Temporary license until this matter was resolved and yet I wasn't. It's standard procedure to offer a Temporary License for an inquiry into reclassification of license or some other bona fide problem. What did Martin say to ICBC, as they would not return my license to me after I completed the DME? According to the documents ICBC sent me they had no legal right to withhold my license after I completed the DME and the staff knew this and yet they would not return my license or inform me why they were told not to. They would not give me a computer print – out of what was written on their computer screens concerning me. This bothered them. They had faces of fear. They were afraid of what they had just read and were now involved in.

Carter, by default, you know what I saw. You've seen fear coming from the naïve bystander, realizing they're involved in something beyond themselves, and they know its wrong. It really was something to watch. These were long time employees and know what they are allowed to do after clients fulfill demands and they were afraid. I informed them they should write down what had just taken place and to inform their Union representative. It was refreshing to see all people involved in this are not corrupt.

Big Idea, Dobbs didn't loose her job for this breach of Affidavit, breach of Trust, and theft of Science, which is all protected by Copyright, Intellectual Property Rights, and Intent of Use Protections devices because Martin and Howie hired her to do it.

Some research stated 'do not use under any circumstances' and Dobbs used it anyway. Why wasn't she fired and charged with breach of Oath of Office, theft, and breach of Copyright, etc? Because she's protected, just as Martin and others involved in this corruption are protected. Dobbs cares nothing for Law, Humanity, Science, and Life. She's wants Power and Money. She wants Prestige and Status, but its really hollow and invalid, because its stolen and false. She really needs to be exposed in defense of Seniors.

And now, three years later Dobbs is attacking Seniors with an unproven need of Intervention, which is against the law, as she and her husband really are running an Experiment on Humans and have not justified it.



As a lawyer involved in Crimes Against Humanity think about that. He's running an illegal Human Experiment, under the auspices that its legal, because its under the umbrella of gov't, and his wife's collecting the data of Harm. Don't forget, she studies Humans in their Senior years and absolutely knows what Stress, Fear, the Unknown, and a Psychological Examination will and does to Seniors. Dobbs will document the consequences and it will turn up as a new research project on her Resume. A Human Experiment that had not been sanctioned by the Scientific Community or governed by a Code of Ethics but seems bona fide, as it has Government attached to it. These people really are the monsters of the world Carter.

Do I fear for my life? Absolutely. Martin escalated his hands off, tertiary, third party societal criminal behaviour to a personal, hands on attack and assault, and psychological attack. He didn't loose his job, as his friends protected him, as Dobbs' friends protected her. He's already admitted he stalked or hunted me. This gang of white collar criminals is what your Recommendations will be confronted with. The Public and health care people trying to manage the UHCS must be informed of the unknown demands and the consequences of these corrupt senior Public Servants. They have a Right to know as Politicians and senior Public Servants are supposed to be working for the Public, for the “democratic society” of Canada, respecting the “supremacy of God”, not playing God and balancing off their killing, and acting within the “rule of law”, not running their own law, not forcing their policy upon the Public, but justifying policy before acting. (all quotes from the Charter) They play flip flop games with the demands of the Charter to protect themselves as they are corrupt.

An Amendment from you may lead to removing this Group – Think of Wrong – Thinking that these people are forcing upon the Public and Government. They need to be exposed and forced out as they will not change, as they are playing God and have set themselves above the Laws of Canada and Humanity. Why would they give that up?

*



History with the Ombudsman

Again, the Ombudsman listened to me during July 2004 – Feb 2007 concerning my Discrimination complaint against the Solicitor General's Office, the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles, as it's driving policy against diabetic drivers is not legal and has horrific consequences, which the Ministry of Health and the OSMV admitted to and the 2009 Human Rights Tribunal Discrimination Complaint Decision also acknowledged. Hard to believe but this is true. As your report can only make Recommendations and not change policy I was informed the same about my Inquiry and Complaint. As the gov't was entrenched in stonewalling in order to protect itself from Treason and Democide I needed to accept they would continue with their stonewalling even if the Ombudsman was a third party, as there was and still is no Science to justify the illegal policy, little lone the horrific consequences of the Government's intervention.

The illegal policy, the harm, and the other Ministries involved exemplifies Scale, which means their influence to cover up their behavior is Grand and beyond the Ombudsperson to make changes to, as even the gov't Opposition is in denial and the Press buries this. I also knew from the behaviour of the Gov't and Public Servants mentioned above, that they would continue to stonewall and lie concerning any recommendation the Ombudsman made, as they have done with me, therefore I decided to move on by myself but with Purpose.

The Purpose, or the Big Idea and Scale was to record Connections and Context; let them, over time, show who they really are and when the killing becomes so Grand maybe others will confront them for their Crimes, Lies, Treason, Murder, Democide, and maybe, just maybe with this attack upon Seniors, Genocide.

Carter, I knew I was confronting deeply corrupt people, psychopaths, and sociopaths and if I continued with my inquiry and complaints they would increase their deviant behaviour and it would be recorded, as it has been. It's important to have a paper trail for proof of corruption and its escalation, as corruption is a long term event.

While questioning the new attack on the Public, the new Senior Policy, by the same corrupt Politician, senior Public Servants, and corrupt “academic researcher” I heard that the Ombudsperson wrote a Report for Seniors and the UHCS. Whom are both part of my Inquiry to make the world a better place, as the Report will be; and yet why should the Ombudsperson not know what has happened to me and what it is doing to the Seniors, UHCS and G Ps, etc, etc.

Are we really allowed to continue with behaviour, illegal behaviour in this instance, knowing its harming? No. The harm is what is happening in Emerge and long – wait times for surgery, as I personally experienced, where I needed to buy personal spinal surgery or wait two years for surgery and suffer spinal damage and become addicted to opiates, pain drugs like Oxycodone. This shouldn't happen to anyone. The scenario is worse that I expose, as we know they shuffle taxes around to pay for the illegal DME in an effort to legitimize the policy, as they falsely married it to the UHCS. I do not believe your Recommendations will not falsely marry actions together to fake legitimacy and bona fide (ness).



The Big Ideas here; I believe the Ombudsperson needs to get involved again.

Firstly, I believe you need to offer an Amendment to clarify how to make your Recommendations work, as you now have new information that is pertinent to such Recommendations and their implementation.

Secondly, A Big Idea. If you take this on as a Formal Complaint against Government, for the betterment of Society, the UHCS, and as they have mislead, misinformed, and misrepresented as to their demands upon the UHCS and doctors you will at least have enough information to ask in depth questions of Politicians and senior Public Servants that have mislead you as to what they are really doing concerning our UHCS, G Ps, the Public, and Seniors.

In conclusion, I know you cannot make or change Policy but you can offer a bona fide Amendment to your report as you are learning new material that will change how your Recommendations should now be viewed. A new perspective will be established for those involved trying to make changes to and save our UHCS and provide care for Seniors. It will also expose the Group – Think of Wrong – Thinking coming from these Politicians and senior Public Servants.

*

Carter, I update the letter titled “Updated Consequences” as readers need to know that the consequences of the Policy do increase over time, as the lies and criminality increase over time, as these people have not been taken to task, as too many people are afraid; we should be afraid of corruption, murder, and Democide. The old moral saying comes into play here; 'lies beget lies, harm begets harm, corruption begets corruption' and as more lies and harm came my way, and I understood the depth of the corruption and its influences I record it.

I make additions to the original letter 'listing the consequences of the illegal policy'; Amendments to it. I do not make changes to what is before; the mistakes in grammar, punctuation, and arithmetic are there; it's the Big Ideas, Scale, Connections and Context that are important. Hopefully, you make the Amendment yourself, as you can see the “Updated Consequences” letter really does expose the extent of the harm and its connections to other harms of the illegal Policy.

Once again, the Public's demands upon the UHCS are severely scrutinized and evaluated for Value, Worth, and Good, whereas the Government's demands are not even evaluated or legal. Exposing this will bring Equality and Inclusion into our “democratic society” for millions of Canadians and benefit Seniors.

*



There are only “TWO” User Groups using the Universal Health Care System

Carter, I have no doubt your Recommendations involve the UHCS, the Ministry of Health, and other Ministries and departments, as there are Connections, as my wife and I discovered caring for our parents needs and we'll need in the coming years. This is an example of the Big Idea; Government and Public.

I can guarantee you, this part of our parent's lives was very difficult at times and the bureaucracy health care workers found themselves within was confusing, negative, and counter productive to health care needs and their health. The health care workers were not the problem, its the senior Public Servants and their attitude that they are equal to God that's the problem. It's their illegal policies, and their corrupt outdated bureaucracies that are problematic. It's those senior Public Servants that are not held responsible or accountable for their actions. It's their misinformation about who's making demands upon the UHCS that's a problem. Senior Public Servants in the Min of Health have not confronted the illegal demands upon the UHCS, or the use of our taxes for phoney medical examinations against the Public, or challenged the new Unethical Human Examinations upon Seniors. Why are these illegal demands allowed and our taxes diverted from bona fide UHCS needs to medical demands that are illegal and offer no Good?

This is Government against the Public. Which is opposite to what it should be. The Monsters have flip flopped another Right – Thinking for their Wrong – Thinking.

Connections, again, I should not have needed to buy spinal surgery, as $50 000 000 – $100 000 000 a year is spent by the OSMV on their illegal policy and its phoney demands upon the UHCS that offers no Good. How many G Ps disappear from the G P pool to fulfill the DME, which delays my examination and referral to a Surgeon? How many Surgeries are delayed due to this yearly illegal debit of our taxes? How many health issues worsen due to this delay? How many clients go to private health care as UHCS surgeries are not funded? Is this Gov't failing the UHCS with purpose?

The total cost for my spinal surgery was approximately $10 000. This means the 160 people waiting for surgery would only cost $1.6 million and how much for other people waiting for surgery? They would all be operated on for less than the illegal demands of the OSMV, which offers nothing Good, and there would be taxes left over if the redundant and illegal policy was stopped. Think of the proven Good.

Another Big Idea is that the shuffled taxes should be used for bona fide demands upon the UHCS. Make those in the Government, the Auto Industry, the OSMV, prove the need, and prove the Intervention is Good, make them play by the same rules the Public is forced to play by. Even though the S G Office reimburses the MSP or UHCS, who pays the G P for the DME, it's still a debit on doctors and still a debit of my taxes used for illegal purposes that's never been proved to offer any Good. My taxes are used for demands upon the UHCS but they should be bona fide demands as the Public's demands are. Does the Min of Health adjust their client/G P ratios knowing the S G makes Grand demands upon G Ps?

The Ministry of Health needs to be exposed for allowing this charade to be played out. Why doesn't it have the power to restrict demands from Government, as it does of the Public? Why haven't past Minister's corrected this Inequality? The only logical conclusion is that the Gang told them not to. Do you thing de Jong has the grit to make these changes? So that All demands upon the UHCS are evaluated the same? It's beyond him, ethically and morally, as he's already proved he cannot obey the demands of the Charter, the HR Code, and the MVA as the Attorney General.



This begs the questions; “How many other demands upon doctors and the UHCS do other Ministry's, departments, and others make upon the UHCS that the Ministry of Health has not acknowledge?”, and “As with the lies from the OSMV, lies beget lies, and as they lie about the OSMV demands how many other lies are played out for concealment?”, and “And how will that impact the Ombudsperson's Recommendations?”

These are only a few Government vs Public problems concerning our UHCS. What's the real total debit coming from Government?

*

A Big Idea, there are only Two User Groups of our UHCS; the Government and the Public.

Carter, people like you and me, the Public, invented Democracy, then we invented Politicians and Public Servants, the Government, to run and manage our Country. We wrote laws to follow and more laws and Oaths of Office for them to follow to protect them from outside demands and from themselves. So, why is it that only you and me, the Public, have our demands upon the UHCS Severely Scrutinized for Want or Need, and Evaluated for Value, Worth, and Good?

Your Recommendations will by default have demands upon the UHCS to be evaluated by the above. Why is it that Government and the Public refuse to look at Government's demands upon the UHCS, as the Public's demands are severely scrutinized, why not Government? Where's the Equality? The Public's demands are evaluated to see it the demand is a Want or Need and if there is Value, Worth, and Good. Your Recommendations will go through this process. Your Office goes through this process, to see if a Complaint or Inquiry is a want or a bona fide need. You also evaluate for Value, Worth, and Good to see if you should, or I should continue, as happened to me.

I don't know who these people are that do the evaluations, but they have been corrupted, as they have not attacked, exposed, and evaluated the Government's demands and illegal demands upon the UHCS. How do they justify the illegal DME and cost? How do they justify the Consequences of the illegal Policy, the acknowledged Harm, the Emerge Killing? How do they justify my Need for private surgery when my taxes are used for illegal demands upon the UHCS? So, with this blatant in – Equality how are the Ombudsperson's Recommendations to be scrutinized fairly?

*

Not until Both User Groups' demands are evaluated Equivalently will our UHCS work properly and the above problems be addressed. Things are not changing for the better, as the Wait – Time Alliance Report notes. Of course not, as the Governments' demands are not acknowledged, the debit of 20 – 25 % of G Ps is not acknowledged, taxes are diverted, therefore the underpinnings of the UHCS, the body of G Ps, is not as it seems, the client/G P ratios are skewed and the gov't knows this.

Can you run the Ombudsperson with a debit of 20% without knowing it's there? The trouble is the Gov't knows the debit is there and yet demands results, as if the debit is not there.

This means your formula for implementing your Recommendations will not work, as the UHCS is not as its seems, because Government lies about its demands upon the Public. And don't forget, I do not use formula, statistics, or calculus, to understand the debit of doctors and taxes involved, just arithmetic using the numbers the Gov't gives the Public about what it's doing. Additionally, due to their proven corruption and my exposure of this the government may not give you any bona fide updated numbers or their True demands upon the UHCS if you ask. You're their Enemy.

Big Idea, Scale, Connections. This debit of G Ps and illegal tax use comes from cowardly, incompetent, and corrupt Politicians and absolutely corrupt senior Public Servants in the Solicitor General's Office, the Office of the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles, the Attorney General's Office, and the Ministry of Health. These are the same Office's or Ministries you will need to engage with and they will protect themselves from you, as they have done to me. Now add all the other Government demands, both legal and illegal. How many G Ps is the Gov't really using that it doesn't document; not only as a debit but the financial cost? How many millions do they spend; it will be more shuffled taxes?

Carter, how many G Ps will the Recommendations be asking for? How many millions? How many changes to old thinking? How many changes to this Group – Think and Wrong – Thinking?

An Amendment to your Recommendations will expose this unexplained Inequality coming from those in Government that have personal objectives counter to the Demands and Objectives of the Laws of B C, of Canada, and Humanity. With one hand these Gangsters are killing and with the other feigning they're managing the UHCS.

*



Big Ideas and Social Psychological Experiments gone wrong.

Carter, your online resume is interesting to say the least. Well done. By default you have Big Ideas, so do I. Your previous work and this are about change and what we should do and not do to be successful. My Big Idea is also Grand. I want to change the World about how diabetes is seen and how diabetics are treated, which will also expose the madness impacting our UHCS, therefore maybe saving it, as this may force Government to acknowledge their demands. As with your Recommendations, this begins in B C, may spread to Canada, maybe to other Democracies, and change the World View of UHCS, Disabilities, and Diabetes. The present “view” of diabetes from the monsters I've introduced you to is not acceptable. And, as diabetes is supposed to be 20% of world population in 10 years, something needs to change; illegal activity not bona fide activity need to change.

However, confronting and exposing Bias, Hate, Fear and Loathing, Disgust, Contempt, Discrimination, Prejudice, Bigotry, Corruption, Treason, Democide, and corrupt Group – Think and Wrong – Thinking is no small matter. This is not just about diabetes and how I'm treated but how this Wrong – Thinking also impacts our “democratic society”, therefore all Democratic Societies, Universal Health Care Systems, and how we're to be treated when we're seventy and eighty.

After ten years of writing the policy is still illegal and harming, as our society is Afraid to challenge these people. The Politicians and senior Public Servants have not fulfilled the demands of the Charter, section 1, the B C Human Rights Code, section 8, and the demands of the Motor Vehicle Act, sections 25, 29, which then gives them 92, the very sections the OSMV states gives it the power to do what its doing. By not fulfilling these demands the present and past Solicitor Generals, Superintendent and Deputy Superintendent of Motor Vehicles have also broke their Oath of Office of do not kill, lie, steal, harm, misinform, mislead, misrepresent, etc. You and I don't do this so why are they allowed to? Their “view” of Life is twisted and Wrong and Canadians do not need to live their lives by such Wrong – Thinking.

These people really are monsters of the Human species. Are you allowed or do you break the above laws of Canada? Do you steal Science and use if for things it was never intended to be used for and has warnings of 'do not use'? Do you or have you breached the Trust of Affidavit? These are Big Ideas in our “democratic society” that keep us from each other's throats. These underpinnings of our democracy have been denigrated, completely disregarded, as if not even written for all to see and use to govern our actions today. What will they do tomorrow? Hold it. Tomorrow is now, it's today, as they're running an unsanctioned, unethical Human Experiment on Seniors. Monsters care for nothing except themselves.

You know there are monsters in the world. These people pretend it's ok to do what they're doing, but it's not, it's a twisted and perverted Group – Think, a perverted Social – Psychological problem, as defined above in “Canada's Democide,...”, pp 8 – 9.



As a Lawyer, Judge, and Judge for Crimes Against Humanity you know about these bona fide sanctioned Human Experiments and Study, and how deviant behaviour expresses and establishes itself, as proved with these studies. Bond, Howie, Martin, Dobbs, and her husband and others involved know they're harming and continue do so even though I say Stop, obey the Law and Stop. The seniors that Bonnie Dobbs and her husband are now attacking have said Stop. An NDP MLA in Powell River has said Stop and they continue on knowing the wrong and harm. The Government's and the senior Public Servant's behaviour is not a Sanctioned, managed Human Experiment, under a Code of Ethics, where the Experiment is stopped before harm or subjects are really killed.

What is happening with the diabetic policy is just another failed Human Experiment, as the above Social Psychological Experiments mentioned above are; the Diabetic and Disabled Policy and now the new Experiment on Seniors are today's examples and failures. However, the Experimentors in those bona fide Sanctioned, Code of Ethics managed Human Experiments stopped their Experiments with the expression of Harm; humans harming humans. Our government's Experimentors care on, they exemplify the Group – Think and Wrong – Thinking of the subjects in the Human Experiments listed above.

In one experiment subjects really believed they were harming people, electrocuting them, and continued on because someone said it was ok to do; a second group, hired actors, took on roles of power, of jail guards, and harmed their fellow actors, physically and psychologically, the professor running the experiment was shocked to see how fast the transformation happened; a teaching Study saw children, then adults, take on discriminatory roles that quickly established Bigotry to the classroom and an evening parent meeting, where once established saw classmates harmed and turned into the Social Pariah. The experimenters and teacher needed to Stop the experiments and study, as those corrupted wouldn't Stop and bullied and threatened those calling for a Stop. These experiments and study demonstrated how quickly we become twisted, aggressive, and invent things to rationalize our behaviour. The people I'm exposing are no different than these subjects that became insensitive, aggressive, and violent. I've said Stop and explained why, and yet they continue because they really are twisted and aggressive, they threaten physically and psychologically, lie, and steal to rationalize their anti – social behaviour.

Their Group – Think has them placing themselves above Laws, Humanity, and Life itself. However, as I've written them for ten years they know what they are doing and are not just caught up in the moment; these people like what they're doing.

A Big Idea, this diabetic Human Experiment is carried out in everyday life, across Canada, it's not a Sanctioned Human Experiment with composed controls coming from outside the Experiment for protection and direction, where the subjects have not given their consent to be involved in an Experiment, where the Experiment does kill and maime, and those running the Policy and Experiment know they are harming and are covering it up. They collect information to change my behaviour; that's what this as an Experiment. Group – Think and Wrong – Thinking drives their Social – Psychological Human Experiment harming our “democratic society”. It's a Human Experiment gone amuke, that's they stole Science in an effort to justify it, make it seem an already proven Theory, thus a bona fide Social Policy; therefore the need for a corrupt “academic researcher”.

The Big Idea here is that these Politicians and senior Public Servants are more than socially dysfunctional, as they know their behaviour is based upon an illegal policy and is really killing and harming and yet they continue. They are not like the subjects in the Experiments mentioned above that ran amuck, these are the Experimentors and are not like the Experimentors in the above where they stopped their experiments. These Experimentors absolutely know they are harming and they continue on, disregarding World Standards of Scientific Experiments, little lone standards of the Social Contract.

Another Big Idea, they really are sociopaths and psychopaths and more, as they know they're harming, which means they like it, or are they indifferent to it? And if they're indifferent to this kind of illegal behaviour, killing, and maiming then what's really wrong with them Carter?



The Big Idea of Right. I knew early on I had won my argument when the low level staff of the OSMV did not have any documents to support their policy and I was told to just believe, as others were doing this. I continued on and senior staff told me they based the policy upon their “view” of life, not the laws of Canada. Government and Public Servants that do not obey the law are not worthwhile people, therefore one does not need to follow them, as their “view” is worthless and against the law; they do have a “view” while in Government. These people are no different than Nazi guards, doing what they're told do to do, knowing the harm and protected by a corrupt Solicitor General's and Attorney General's Offices.

Secondly, you know you're Right when they begin lying, break the Crown Settlement Agreement they instigated, where the Supervising lawyer for the Attorney General's Office then played a charade to cover it up, (that was really interesting), offered phoney Drafts of a Policy to be, which I reviewed and Deconstructed, lied and threatened me after I contacted Deputy Superintendent Howie making another inquiry into where the Policy Paper was, as she promised the BC HRT a Policy Paper to justify the Policy; this was after her theft of science and its withdrawal, so how was she to justify the policy when she withdrew any defense of the policy in the BC HRT discrimination complaint? Howie is absolutely corrupt.

Third, you know you're Right when you're attacked, assaulted, and lied about to denigrate your character; all done by Martin to harm and show me who's Boss.

Fourth, you know you're Right when Solicitor General Bond defends the aggressor, Martin, and lies concerning the breached Settlement Agreement and the legality of the Policy.

All because I've exposed them and made Recommendations to follow the laws of Canada, Science, and Humanity and cancel the illegal policy; the illegal Human Experiment. Again, what I've Recommended it Right, Just, and does the Public enormous Good.



Carter, these people will do the same to those trying to implement your Recommendations. They will be stymied and stonewalled because you've exposed how incompetent the Politicians and their senior Public Servants are; concerning how the UHCS is presently run, the inadequacies for Seniors and their needs.

Oh yah, buy the way, this is not easy to say to you, these people now Hate you, as they Hate me. They Hate me and this is proven buy not only the illegal policy, but as they cannot accept I do visit the G P for diabetic care every three months; they cannot acknowledge this Fact because of their Hate. My examination is bona fide, paid for by MSP or UHCS, and does Good for not only me but for the Public Good. Only Hate drives people to not acknowledge Good such as my G P and I practice, not only for myself, Personal care, but for everyone, Public care. This acknowledgment would cancel any need for the Experiment and it would prove how phoney, meaningless, useless, and unnecessary the Form, their data, is.

I continue to work on my Big Idea the best I can, I'll never stop, as these are my Rights as a Canadian and as a Human and these people are taking this away from me and millions of other Canadians. As to my complaint, nothing has changed very much concerning diabetic drivers or seniors in the past ten years, so why should I stop as my fight is for Canada and these Monsters have never stopped, in Fact they've escalated their deviant behaviour.

Carter, maybe you can add something to your Big Idea, with some new Recommendations, before you move on to something new. Correct the Group – Think and Wrong – Thinking that's going to have your Recommendations sitting on a shelf collecting dust due to corruption.

*



The “Big Idea” of Death and “Scale”

Carter, the above is what they're doing now and refuse to Stop, knowing the harm and you think they'll implement what you Recommend? You're the Good Person and they're the Monsters, and Monsters don't listen to Good Guys and Gals.



Remember Big Ideas, Scale, and Connections and Context. Remember, “You” practice “Right – Thinking”.

As the government knows its harming, and the harm is the inordinate high number of deaths that Emerge doctors call Press Conferences about, how or what are these deaths explained as, or Classified as?

If your behaviour causes a (1) death, the death can be realized as an accident.

The second (2) death, from the same behaviour, is what? Still an accident?

The third (3) is Homicide, as you know your behaviour is harming and you consciously continued with your behaviour. And in this case proven Illegal Behaviour.

The fourth (4) is Serial Killer.

The fifth (5) is Mass Murder.

The sixth (6) is a Crime Against Humanity.

The seventh (7) is an Atrocity against Humanity

The twelfth (12) death is what?

The twelfth Human death is what's happening in one of the ten (10) busiest Emerge facilities in B C, of the 100 or so hospitals in B C, at one (1) death per month in an Overcrowded Emerge, that Emerge Doctors call Press Conferences about.

*

At a minimum, let's use only one (1) death per Month caused by Emerge Overcrowding; that Emerge doctors call Press Conferences about. However, do you really believe Emerge doctors call Press Conferences concerning one (1) death a Month caused by the Overcrowding? (see letter titled Updated Consequences for more)

1 death a month is 12 Human deaths a year, x the 10 hospitals is 120 deaths a year x the 10 years I've been writing is 1 200 deaths due to Emerge Overcrowding, which is caused by illegal gov't policy such as, the illegal diabetic driver's policy that's been acknowledged as not proved to be needed and harms.

This is what you'll be fighting Carter. Bona fide Monsters and their killings.



Now the real horror of this Group – Think and Wrong – Thinking begins. Think Scale again Carter. Because these driving policies are National and B C is approximately 12% of Canada we need to multiply this death toll by 8. This gives us 9 600 Human deaths caused by illegal gov't policy at only one (1) death a month from the ten (10) busiest Emerge facilities. Now add all the other Emerge deaths caused by Overcrowding, where the Overcrowding may only express during weekends or holidays in small hospitals and rural hospitals.

Now you know why the Winnipeg Police attacked me and are trying to bury the Sinclair death, as it will also protect them from the other death and maiming cases now in front of their courts.



Carter, are you saying this is not happening? You should be, as you're a Critical Thinker, a Right – Thinker, and you should be denying this. However, as sad as it is, it really is happening. You need to think Scale for this, just as you think and understand Big Ideas and Scale for your Crimes Against Humanity, and now your Seniors' Report and Recommendations.



Emerge doctors deal with life and death, as that's what Emerge is supposed to be about, and one death a month is driving them to jump up and down and scream Stop? It's not logical or reasonable to believe Emerge doctors call Press Conferences for one (1) death a month, more realistically it may be one (1) a week. That would be 52 Human deaths a year per hospital, they're open 24/7/365. 520 dead Humans for the 10 hospitals and 5 200 Humans for the past 10 years, at one (1) death a week, for B C.

Times 8 for Canada and we have 41 600 over the past 10 years.

This is Democide; large numbers of the Public killed by government policy and illegal policy at that. Now you know why the Politicians lie and pretend this is not happening. Why Martin attacked and assaulted me. Why the Chief of Police in Winnipeg attacked me. Why the Press does not interview Emerge doctors anymore. Interesting eh.



This Death Total is equivalent to the Genocide in Bosnia, Croatia, and Serbia. Were you involved in that horror? Now you know why so many Canadians are Afraid to stand up and say anything. They allow the Emerge doctors to be the fall guy or the proper word is, Scapegoat, to hide their Shame. (Explained further in my letter to the Manitoba Nurses Union, December 14, 2011 concerning their involvement in the Brian Sinclair Emerge death and how a Nurse has been set up as the Scapegoat, to divert any glimpse of Government involvement, therefore responsibility.)

And you wonder why these Politicians and Public Servants lie, steal, falsify documents, and have escalated their behavior to attacking and assaulting me and raping my character by falsifying gov't documents that I had been found unfit. It's just another lie by these monsters to transfer deviant behaviour and blame to someone else; just like murders do.

What you have just read is based upon Arithmetic and realized by how many diabetics there are, how long it takes to do the examination, and how many hours a G P works in a year, therefore how many G Ps are needed to fulfill the diabetic exam and then add the G Ps needed to fulfill the demands of the other 100 medical exams Bond, Martin, and Howie state they monitor for the betterment of society. Lawlessness and murder is Betterment? Scale is needed to see this through to the Big Idea it is. The loss of so many G Ps to Form filling drivers clients to Emerge.

Lastly, Emerge doctors still inform us that 50% of Emerge clients should not be there. They should be visiting their G Ps, but 20% of G Ps are debited from the system because they're filling out illegal and useless forms for corrupt Public Servants. Scale, one (1) G P can have 12 000 client visits a year; 6 clients an hour is 48 a day x 40 hrs a week x 52 weeks a year. 400 000 diabetic drivers at half hour visit and form is 200 000 hrs of G P time; therefore approximately 16 G Ps just for diabetic drivers or 0.372% of G Ps. Now add the other 99 medical conditions that are monitored. As diabetes is ten (10%) of society taking 16 G P or 0.4% of the body of G Ps, coming from 4 300 G Ps, and if the other medical conditions listed average to be 5% of society each, or 0.2% of G Ps each, we see 5% = 8 G Ps, then we have 100 medical conditions x 8 G Ps = 800 G Ps. We see approximately 800 G Ps taken out of service just for the OSMV, which is approximately 18% of G Ps. 16 G Ps x 12 000 visits per year = 192 000 client visits that have now had their availability to a G P delayed. 100 G Ps is 1 200 000, 200 G Ps is 2 400 000 client visits that have been delayed. These people go to Emerge. 800 G Ps x 12 000 visits a year is 9 600 000 client visits that have disappeared or have had their timeline to visit a G P lengthened beyond acceptability, so they go to Emerge, as these G Ps really disappear and the client visits transfer to other G Ps, therefore other G P visit timelines increase to a 5 – 7 day wait – time.

Once again, its Scale that needs to be acknowledged to understand why the Emerge is Overcrowded by people that should not be there and the killing continues after so much work trying to re – manage Emerge. It's illegal Government policy that's not acknowledge, therefore all the re – management has not worked because the debit of G Ps is not acknowledge as it will come back the Governments illegal demands upon the UHCS.

The above illegal policies and the horrific consequences all impact your Recommendations for the UHCS and G Ps, that you and I need for our live and Seniors.

*

Carter, you've been involved in Genocide and War Crimes. Genocide is the hunting of a selected Class of People in a society and killing them. This diabetic policy and the disabled policies do not kill a selected Class, the hunted people are not killed, the naïve bystander is killed and maimed while those doing the hunting fulfill their Hate, Prejudice, and Bigotry. This disabled and diabetic killing in a democratic society needed to be defined, therefore, the term Democide was invented and is used; one of the definitions used to define this type of killing is 'large numbers of the public killed by government policy'. (Wikipedia under Genocide) And remember, this policy is illegal. One death is too many, legal or not.



If you don't believe this then why hasn't the Gov't and Press and so many others I've contacted explored and responded to this illegal policy of the Solicitor General's Office and the Office of the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles?

Why does the Press only make a spectacle of the survivor of an Overcrowded Emerge death and not investigate why 50% of the Emerge clients are there, especially after I contact them about this? Interesting fact, eh.

Why has the Chief of Police, Winnipeg, just tried to bury the death of Brian Sinclair and have blame fall upon a Nurse and not Government and senior Public Servants that created the Overcrowding?

I'm confronting and exposing Discrimination, Prejudice, and Bigotry on a Grand Scale. I'm confronting people lusting for Status, Power, Prestige, and Wealth, and it's more than Lust for living on the edge of Criminality, they love the Criminality and are twisted by it. They care nothing for Seniors, as is exemplified with the seniors already participating in the diabetic DME, as by default, diabetes expresses in our later years. Seniors will also be impacted by one or more of the 100 medical conditions due to age and forced to undergo a DME already. As with diabetic care I do not believe their personal care has been acknowledged by gov't, as Public declaration would void any need for the gov't to play with Human lives.

Lastly, further Senior abuse is exemplified with this new illegal drivers policy supposedly monitoring Seniors by participation in an unethical, illegal, harmful Human Social – Psychological Experiment; run by a Fascist or Nazi “academic researcher”, a “Dr.”, and her husband.

Carter, the Big Idea is about how many Humans these Politicians and senior Public Servants are going to kill with their Group – Think and Wrong – Thinking, as Dobbs studies Seniors and absolutely knows that Unknowns, Stress, and Strains do kill Seniors; events like arbitrary, stressful, psychological experiments. The killing will come.

*



ICBC

Why did Steve Martin, recently attack and assault me and rape my character when I sent the enclosed letter to ICBC explaining they did not have the Legal Right to cancel my license? I did this as Martin did not have the legal right to change my Classification of diabetes type and ICBC needed to know this, as I had not contacted ICBC previously about the illegal policy, as there was no need to, as ICBC does Not discriminate against me for being diabetic. Maybe this really was the first time they knew about the policy. We need to give ICBC the benefit of doubt, but why haven't they contacted me?

Those that confront and expose those that are corrupt, or challenge the status quo, are attacked, are stomped upon, to be driven back to “Their Place”. This is what Martin tried to do, and ICBC seems to be afraid of. Did the Premier, and/or the Solicitor General, and/or Martin threaten ICBC? What's the Scale of illegally with the cancelled license due to Martin's illegal policy and his deception to have ICBC cancel licenses? What's the Scale of corruption now ICBC and the RCMP know the “Notice of Prohibition” is illegal and falsely contrived? Carter, where's that take us now, a “democratic society”, where our National Police, the RCMP, are covering this up?

Don't forget, as a diabetic driver I'm Classified, Labeled, Given a Number, Forced to undergo a Useless, Phoney, Mock, Pseudo, and/or Bogus medical examination, and I'll be Tracked for the remainder of my life. And this is on top of my regular driving license qualifications that come from ICBC.

Again, ICBC has not responded to my questions considering the illegal policy, its consequences, the illegal “Notice of Prohibition”, and why they refused to return my license after I completed Martin's contrived demand that I complete another Drivers' Medical Examination. At the least I should have been given me a Temporary license until this attack from Martin was resolved. Temporary, as it seemed at that time my license was not only turned in but cancelled. By not giving me a Temporary license ICBC Discriminated against me, as they did not follow their own demands or statues written on their paperwork concerning the renewal of license, which I complied with. They won't respond, as they've turned their backs on this illegal policy and its harm, which means they're covering up the Homicide and Treason coming from Bond, Martin, and Howie, and their colleagues, which means they're just a guilty as those doing the killing. They're still cancelling licenses using the “Notice of Prohibition” knowing the demands of the MVA statutes have not been fulfilled, knowing Martin has informed them they were. Martin falsified documents to make it seem the “Notice of Prohibition” has legal tender. His acts define Treason.

Who threatened ICBC to not respond to me?. Isn't the manager of ICBC an American? Was this brought up?

*

Death Insurance. Carter, if you survive a driver mishap and die in Emerge due to the Overcrowding, will the death be listed as a “Driving Mishap Death”, or an “Emerge Death”, or an “Emerge Death due to Overcrowding”? “Driver Mishap Death” insurance is paid by ICBC. But “Emerge Death” and “Emerge Death due to Overcrowding” is paid by whom; ICBC or Private Life insurance? Is ICBC, Private Life Insurance, or the Government paying for the death insurance, as the Government's behaviour is responsible for the Overcrowding, therefore the death. So, who killed you Carter? The driver mishap or Overcrowding? Interesting eh.

This is like upstream behaviour that kills downstream; the upstream behaviour is responsible because the behaviour caused the poison that killed downstream. Those downstream are the naïve bystander; the Emerge doctors and Winnipeg Nurse.

Scale, where and when death happens, and who's doing the killing is important to follow. Do you think ICBC and Government want this to be opened up for the Public to see. Do you think ICBC, Bond, Martin, and Howie want you to know this?

So, the Ambulatory Service saves your life Carter, only to be taken from you in an Overcrowded Emerge caused by illegal gov't policy. The cause of death will be listed incorrectly, listed as “Driver Mishap”, which is wrong. This means the number of “Emerge Deaths” and “Death in Emerge due to Overcrowding” that doctors report will be lower than it should be. This is Good for gov't.

So, the number of “Deaths in Emerge due to Overcrowding” will be skewed, saving face for Government. Doctors evaluate deaths and know the difference between Emerge Deaths and Deaths due to Overcrowding, and now we know the difference between Driver Mishaps and those of Overcrowding how high is the death rate Emerge doctors are holding Press Conferences about? How many “Driver Mishap Deaths” should really be listed as “Death in Emerge due to Overcrowding”? How many “Emerge Deaths” should be listed as “Death in Emerge due to Overcrowding”? Emerge Doctor's Press Conferences do not address Government involvement in this deaths. How should Emerge doctors know what I've exposed as they do not give DME or know what G Ps really do out there in the Public domain. They believe Government is fulfilling all their legal demands and Oath's of Office, as doctors do, before they enter into the Public's life. Through gov't deception Emerge doctors are lead to believe some deaths are “Driver Mishaps” but really they're not.

How will ICBC explain this? ICBC paying for deaths caused by illegal Government policy?



Carter, I don't believe one can sue ICBC or the hospital for death due to a Driver Mishap; the insurance is just paid. But as Overcrowding in Emerge killed you, and the Overcrowding is Government instigated, due to illegal policy, would your Estate be allowed to sue Government? Death through negligence, indifference to Human Life, through reckless endangerment to Human Life causing death? You're the Lawyer and Judge, make a list of charges for your Estate.

It's an interesting fact concerning this illegal policy and its consequences.

*

Treason; as a former “Director of Military Prosecutions” and “military judge” you know of Treason, you know it's not just a military 'person' selling secrets, as a claim of military treason is happening in Canada today. It's also about 'people' trying to take over our “democratic society” , people running policy in Opposition to the demands of our “rule of Law”. (quotes from the Charter) It's about people contriving and implementing their own policies in opposition to the Demands and Objectives of the Constitution, the Human Rights Code, the Motor Vehicle Act, their Oaths of Office, breaking established social protocol such as Trust, abusing Crown Corporations such as ICBC, falsifying gov't documents such as the “Notice of Prohibition”, and misleading about cause of death for death certificates and Insurance claims.

As stated above these Traitors know their policies are illegal, harmful, and against the Demands and Objectives of the Crown. The senior lawyer for the Attorney general's Office broke the Crown Settlement Agreement they contrived to have my BC HRT discrimination complaint withdrawn, then played a charade to cover it up, to make it seem as if they were obeying the Crown's demands, while with the other hand they run their own policy based upon their “view” of life, not the “rule of Law”. They really are Traitors for doing this.

These people are not naïve bystanders to what they are doing. They know there are consequences to their illegal behaviour, as they have stated so and continued on with their illegal behavior. They also know they are running policy against the Demands and Objectives of the Crown. They know, by default, that traitorous endeavors demand “some people will be sacrificed” for the Traitors “view” of life; Emerge deaths and those waiting for surgery are the example. They know there will be “collateral damage”, which needs to be covered up, as best as possible without exposing themselves, the abuse of ICBC and Emerge deaths are an example of their “damage control”.

Carter, they know they're killing and harming, breaching the Charter and Human Rights Code, and it's deemed acceptable, as they know they're committing Treason, in order to run things through their “view” of life. It's acceptable as they are not the naïve bystanders; society and you are.

Lastly, ICBC does not discriminate against Senior drivers as their rate of driver mishap is not a problem, so how is it that ICBC does not speak against the false accusations concerning Seniors coming from a corrupt “academic researcher” and her husband running an illegal, non – sanctioned Human Experiment within its Licensing Offices? Government doing so, under the umbrella of ICBC, feigns legality and a hands off approach, therefore implied bona fide (ness), which we know is a lie. So, now Seniors are the “some people will be sacrificed” and the “collateral damage” for these Traitors “view” of how Canada's “democratic society” should be. They're wrong and an Amendment would expose this Group – Think and Wrong – Thinking of these Traitors.

*



More “Scale”; Connections to Canada

An Example of an Emerge Death, the Denial, and the Cover – up; Brian Sinclair's Investigation

Carter, a working example of the Consequences of this illegal policy is the death of Brian Sinclair, he died in an Overcrowded Winnipeg Emerge Clinic, he waited 34 hours for care, didn't get it, and died. It took two years of work for lawyers to get an Investigation into this. There's other deaths and maiming also, but Sinclair's death has hit the Press; I believe there are thirteen complaints about deaths and maiming. I wrote the lawyers involved, as not being diabetic, or disabled, or General Practitioners they know nothing of this illegal policy and its consequences; Overcrowded Emerge being one. I also wrote the Chief of Police running the Investigation. The Chief and his staff really didn't like what I exposed and are in denial of gov't involvement in Overcrowding; they're senior Public Servants also. So, the Chief of Police or whom ever is manipulating him had a Nanaimo Mental Health Nurse and her student and a RCMP constable show up at my door for an interview, an interrogation, concerning all this. We talked for an hour or so. The nurse left and the RCMP constable informed me that I had an excellent state of health. Interesting eh.

I emailed the Health Nurse the letters I've enclosed, as she arrived with any knowledge of the circumstances, as should be, so she could read about the illegal policy and it's horrific influences upon Diabetics, Emerge facilities, G Ps, Surgery wait – times, Ambulatory Care, the UHCS, and people's mental health.



Big Idea. Carter; “How important is my material that a charade such as this was played to denigrate my character?”

This Psychological attack, from Manitoba, is similar to the Martin attack and assault where he wrote I was unfit; it's a Psychological attack, as is the new attack upon driving Seniors.

This was done by Martin as the gov't cannot legally justify what they're doing, have not stopped what they're doing, and have not been able to force me to leave the argument through stonewalling, lies, attrition, and age, so they escalated their denial and defense by denigrating my character, implying that I should be seen as “unfit”, therefore my Charter, Human Rights, and Discrimination complaints should also be seen as unfit. Don't forget they cancelled my license for months.

This same tactic of “unfitness” was/is being used against Brian Sinclair; being First Nations, amputee, wheel chaired, unemployed, pain in the ass, street person, no fixed address, a revolving debit upon the UHCS, etc, etc. The objective is to have Sinclair viewed as “unfit”, therefore not fit for standard social acknowledgment and medical treatment and that's ok. Don't forget, Sinclair's dead and cannot defend himself; if he could have defended himself he would be alive. Sinclair is not the problem here. Those that contrived Sinclair as the Social Pariah are the problem.

These Wrong – Thinkers are the same people you've confronted with the Report. And now they've turned Seniors into the Social Pariah with no Charter Rights, Human Rights, or Rights under the MVA.

*

The longer the corruption the more brazen the perpetrators and their actions, the more twisted they become, the greater the denial they are wrong and the Sinclair Investigation is the perfect example of this denial and the lengths they will go to in order to cover it up.

The Manitoba gov't and its illegal policies constructed the Overcrowding, not First Nations People, street people, or you and I asking for medical help because we cannot visit our G P within a reasonable time. A single Nurse is not responsible for Sinclair's death, nor is the Emerge Clinic. They're the constructed Scapegoats. Follow the Scale of events and Connections Carter. The first action is the illegal policies that illegally debit G Ps to administer phoney medical examinations and complete the meaningless, useless Forms. The second step drives clients to Emerge, as they cannot access a G P within a reasonable time, as the G P is busy filling out phoney medical exams and their forms. The third step is the death of naïve bystander, such as Sinclair, in a Overcrowded Emerge, which was created by illegal gov't policies. This means the Government's illegal policies are the cause of the death, not those underfunded and understaffed workers and facilities, which the Government has itself caused and supposedly manages. The gov't underfunds Nurses and Doctors and the Emerge and then blames those very people for the problem they cause with illegal demands upon the Public which forces the Public to them. It's an interesting line of process the Gov't is in denial of.

Carter, someone does 'something', 'something' causes 'this', and 'this' causes a death. The someone is responsible for the death. These deaths are not five, or ten, or twenty steps away from the original event or action.

The Chief of Police in Winnipeg knows this, as does the senior lawyer for the B C Attorney General's Office, and that's why they've played charades to denigrate my character and cover – up what they're really doing. That's why B C has lied, stolen science, falsified documents and an Affidavit, stonewalled, threatened, etc, etc, to contrive me, as the Wrong. To contrive Sinclair, as the Wrong. To have Seniors, as the Wrong and in need of Examination.

*

There are other forms of Scale that need to be acknowledged, Scale to Protect, Scale in the movement of the Investigation to another Province; “Physical distance” infers innocence. This is just another charade played out, to feign a hands – off or laissez – affair to deceive concerning Manitoba's involvement, being a cause or the cause of the Overcrowding.

Also, Scale concerning impartiality and unbiased involvement in not only the death of Sinclair but all deaths in Overcrowded Emerge facilities, as many survivors and their lawyers are now investigating these deaths. Just another charade with the inference of impartiality and unbiasedness, as they're saying; 'We're so innocent we volunteer to have “Outsiders” access us'; “Psychological distance” infers innocence. However, the “Outsiders” really are them, as the policy is the same, same harm, same idea of Politicians and senior Public Servants, etc, etc, just in another province.

Big Ideas and Connections need to be acknowledged, to all deaths and maiming, as there is no fault with Sinclair, no fault with the naïve bystanders such as the Nurse being charged with Homicide and the Emerge Clinic under threat of loosing its license. Who's the person upstream polluting the river for those living and working downstream? And with the move to Saskatchewan, the length of the river has just increased a thousand fold, implying non – existent influences.

The Chief and his supporters are just playing another charade covering up gov't harm and finding Scapegoats, as is done with Emerge doctors concerning the Emerge deaths and maiming in B C. The Emerge doctors are used as Scapegoats for the illegal gov't policy and its harm; Scapegoats, right out of Greek history and their wonderful plays that expose gov't corruption and the slight of hand, through Scapegoats, used to falsely remedy the social dysfunction and harm caused by the monsters running the City States or Public; policy run by Group – Think and Wrong – Thinking.



This charade of movement to Saskatchewan was an interesting play by the Chief of Police and his colleagues. The Chief of Police was given the mandate to make decisions and recommendations. I entered his life from no where and he didn't like it. He played a charade and it was a flop, so he needed something else to defend his position. He passed the buck, didn't make a decision, he passed the responsibility to someone in the Saskatchewan Attorney General's Office because through my letters the Chief and his colleagues came to know how corrupt and harmful the policies are; that Sinclair is indeed the working example of the harm acknowledged by the B C government. It seems, at first blush, that it's just more Public Servants doing their job, a hands off – affair, but it isn't, not really, as Saskatchewan also has Overcrowding, etc, caused by illegal government policies, which means they're corrupt also and will stonewall and deceive to protect their fellow senior Public Servants and illegal gov't policy. All done because if Manitoba is found Wanting, reviews of Saskatchewan's policies will also be open for Investigation, as will B C; therefore Canada; maybe All developed democracies having UHCS. Interesting Big Ideas, Scale, and Connections, eh.

An Amendment to your Report may also impact the rest of Canada. That would be Good.

*

Recent articles concerning the above Investigation, from the TV NEWS and local online Manitoba NEWS, informed me that a Nurse is now living under the threat of a Homicide charge and the Clinic Emerge is also under threats of accountability.

What I realized was that, as the Chief attacked me in denial, he probably had not given or made Public the fact of gov't involvement in Sinclair's death to All the parties involved in the Investigation. He's running the Investigation and All information needs to be talked about, not hidden to protect one of the players. What the Chief and his colleagues did to me was wrong, so by past behaviour we know he would not offer what I sent him to the other players; those he will try to find fault with. As stated above, lies beget lies and corruption begets corruption.

Carter, realizing this I sent the Nurses' Union and the Clinic the same letters the Chief had received, informed them of what the Chief had done to me, asked them to ask why the Chief had not informed them of what he knew, had done to cover – up, deny government involvement, and denigrate my character. As my information was important enough to send a Mental Health Nurse and RCMP to interrogate me my information is Good enough that All parties should have been informed. He covered – up important information that would give a new understanding of the problem at hand. It was Wrong to do. They like you now have New Information concerning what you have Presented and how this can force of demand Amendments.

*

A Big Idea. What was done to me was well thought out, as how else could the Winnipeg Chief of Police get the National Police force, the RCMP in B C, to protect a B C Mental Health Nurse sent out to interrogate someone that they wanted to destroy. I'm sure the Winnipeg Chief made local inquiries concerning the legality of the Manitoba diabetic policy and other disabled driver policies and their consequences , as what I write about should not be happening in Canada and the things done to me should not happen to anyone. Is it to be believed the Chief did not contact the B C Solicitor General's Office and the Office of the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles concerning the diabetic policy and its consequences, and what I had exposed, to better understand the material I sent him? Of course he did.

A Big Idea. What the Chief has tried to do is construct 'Steps Away' from the original event, “Distance”, in order to deny any culpability, to try and make it seem the Manitoba gov't is further away from any direct action concerning the Overcrowding and Sinclair's death; by having another gov't intervene the Chief presents a false bone fide (ness) or bogus 'cultured Trustworthiness', where we should believe the decision from some far away place, as they have no immediate involvement and manage by the “rule by law”. However, this 'cultured Trustworthiness' has been broken in B C, Manitoba, and Saskatchewan as the same illegal polices are running there; the Public just doesn't know it, but the Government and senior Public Servants do. The Trust that Democracies have cultured by way of such events as our Charter, the HR Code, MVA, and Oaths of Office has been broken by these people and far away places are not good enough for Decisions as all information has not been given to them, and they know it, but the Public doesn't.

The Chief and his colleagues have also broken the Social Contract of Trust that we, as just People in Canada, have cultured in order to live together, without looking over our shoulders all the time, to protect us from monsters such as I've encountered and the Chief is protecting and become. He's become what he's sworn to fight.

We know the B C Government has consciously denied the Public these Trusts; this does not mean the Chief needs to follow along and feign ignorance; what's the old adage, they did it so I thought it would be ok for me to do. This is not acceptable in Canada, in the World; Crimes Against Humanity are not acceptable.

The policies are the same in Manitoba and Saskatchewan, the Overcrowding is the same, so why should anyone just 'believe' the Politicians and senior Public Servants in Saskatchewan are absolutely Trustworthy after the Winnipeg Chief of Police's slight of hand to cover it up, misinform, and the attack upon me.

A Big Idea. The Chief, by way of having Saskatchewan evaluate the Investigation, has contrived 'Distance', which in itself creates not only Physical distance, but a Psychological distance from the Manitoba government's involvement; he's contrived the presentation of distance, to manipulative the defensive phenomenon of, 'out of sight is out of mind'; have the Manitoba Government out of sight and they will not be in view to question.



Carter, would you make inquiries to see if the policies were legal or not? Ask if the OSMV had fulfilled the demands of the MVA? Ask about the consequences? Ask about the stolen research, breached Crown Settlement Agreement, and breached Affidavit? You would, as by default, your history informs us you do so.

How is it that the Chief was allowed to hire someone from the UHCS, a mental health nurse, supposedly an expert, to interrogate me, and hire an RCMP for protection during the interrogation? Did he apply this interrogation technique to senior Public Servants in Manitoba to discover the truth? How is it that my writings were so important for the Chief to run this charade and not important enough for him to inform the Nurse's Union and the Emerge Clinic of the Government's involvement?

This is an Investigation the Chief of Police was running and all things involved must be talked about and the Chief and his colleagues hid the most important information; it would be interesting to know what B C said to the Chief, as who gave permission and organized the interrogation of me? Was Martin involved as he already attacked me and it didn't work out very well. We know his behaviour is Obsessive and Compulsive. So he escalated his endeavors to find me unfit, not by lying and falsifying legal documents this time, and cancelling my license, but by physical, psychological, and an 'in my face' interrogation this time, with the RCMP there to intimidate. Yes, Martin would come at me again as he's hidden this time, a hands off approach with no roads back to him; that's what cowards and bullies do. Connections need to be made.

*

After experiencing the above I defined Scapegoat for the Nurse's Union and the Emerge Clinic, as they really need to come to terms with how they are being used by gov't in its effort to hide their involvement in Emerge Overcrowding, the deaths and maiming, and any responsibility and accountability for doing so. This new information will allow the Nurse's Union and the Emerge Clinic to make an Amendment to whatever was sent to the Saskatchewan Attorney General's Office, which has been given the power to evaluate what the Chief has sent them. However, they need All relevant information, which the Chief certainly made the Connections to mine as relevant. They need all information to make a bona fide decision, as the Public and UHCS in B C needs All information to add to the Information you've made Public.

Do you really believe the Chief informed Saskatchewan of the illegal policies and the consequences in a Public letter? No, we do not need to believe this of him, as he's also a senior Public Servant and will protect his colleagues at any cost, as exemplified with his Not so subtle attack on my character and support of the RCMP for not investigating this illegal policy and illegal “Notice of Prohibition”.

So, a Nurse and the Emerge Clinic have been set up as the Scapegoats, to be blamed for a Government Department, or Ministry, or medical system experiencing failure due to Government illegal demands, which have horrific consequences, where the sacrifice of a Nurse and the Clinic's Good Name will just be an accepted consequence to this perverted, corrupt, illegal, amoral, unethical Group – Think and Wrong – Thinking coming from corrupt Politicians and senior Public Servants in Manitoba, as it's coming from some far away place.

The non – literal death of a Nurse, ten years or life in jail and the disqualification of the Nurse license will be like death, it will be the metaphorical death of a nurse and person, and the death of the Clinic's Good Name is in motion. They are just more road kill to these socially dysfunctional people running these illegal policies and their cover – ups. These people will put the Nurse in jail; it's the Nurse or Them. And they've chosen a Nurse as the fall guy, or the Human Scapegoat, and Scapegoats are killed off, the Sacrifice, to save those that are responsible for the social and psychological troubles of a society that were caused by the very people doing the killing, not the naïve bystanders.



A Big Idea. Carter, if you were a Nurse, a Professional, just doing your Profession in an Overcrowded Emerge, that you didn't create, that your Union or Professional Organization has not been able to correct, and now had a Homicide charge hanging around your neck would you like to know about illegal gov't policies and the consequences of those actions? About how those consequences construct the Emerge Overcrowding where you just happen to work? How the B C Gov't and its senior Public Servants have falsified documents, etc, after admitting that the policy is illegal and harms. That the

B C Human Rights Tribunal did not live up to their Aim, Goal, or Mandate to defend against Discrimination and its consequences? That the Chief of Police, just buried all this information from you and your counsel?

I think you would like to know all this; you have a Right to know this. Whom ever this nurse is, he or she, is the Scapegoat for these monsters and she or he needs to know how she or he is being played. Going to jail and loosing a Nurse's license and then discovering all this I'm involved in is not Good enough. This Nurse is a naïve bystander, being set – up for failure.

An Amendment to your Recommendations may stop such things as this happening in B C. It would protect the naïve bystanders, Nurses, Emerge Doctors and staff, the UHCS, and Seniors.



Connections. I stated in my letters, concerning this illegal policy, that in Manitoba a First Nation's person stood up and would not support gov't policy, the Meech Lake Accord, that would have created a Canada with special people, denying Equality and Inclusion to many or for all. Carter, maybe Sinclair's death, another First Nation's person, will not be a senseless death, will make Canada a better place too, as this exposure may force some Politicians and senior Public Servants to obey the laws of Canada and Humanity, as most Politicians, Public Servants, and the Public do.

Secondly, this exposure may also allow diabetics and the disabled to have Equality and Inclusion in our “democratic society”, where today, due to these illegal policies their Constitutional Rights have been forfeited due to Politicians and senior Public Servants personal “view” of life, not through the adherence to law.

Third, the Public's Human Rights have also been forfeited for the demands of these Politicians and senior Public Servants due to their personal lust for Wealth, Status, Power, and Prestige; not for the Public Good.

Fourth, exposure may allow those naïve bystanders that go to Emerge for care, the Right to Life we all have, to not be endangered due to illegal gov't policy, to not die in an Overcrowded Emerge as so many have, as Sinclair died, Not knowing who really killed him and for what.

These cowardly, incompetent, and corrupt Politicians and absolutely corrupt senior Public Servants need to be exposed for the Good of Canada and Humanity; this is the Big Idea. If the exposure comes through Manitoba that's great. However, I would like to see the changes come through British Columbia, as we know who some of the players are and they should be held accountable and we know what they've done to cover up their illegal behaviour.

An Amendment would expose problems with some Politicians and some senior Public Servants who have put themselves above the Laws of B C, Canada, and Humanity and act as if they're sitting beside God.

*

Seniors

A new Big Idea concerning Seniors. What will happen to Seniors when they refuse to be Psychologically Examined by the OSMV and their corrupt “academic researcher” and her husband and question Bond, Martin, and Howie about their new illegal policy, as I did? I was attacked and had my license cancelled for an indefinite time. They're using Dobbs again to justify their demands upon the Public and now she has her husband in tow. Again, Dobbs is the academic researcher who stole science and lied about the Right to use it, broke the Trust of the Affidavit, broke the Trust of World Standards of Science, broke the Trust of the Social Contract and now there's her husband whom we must also question about his Qualifications and Intent. According to Simons, the NDP MLA for Powell River, Dobbs' husband's computer toy has not been proved to be able to do what he claims it can do. Simon's stated it has not been peer reviewed for bona fide (ness), therefore it's an unproven, psychological computer toy that is being used to Psychologically Evaluate Senior drivers, as to their Psychological and Physical state of being? They're running an unsanctioned, unmonitored Human Experiment, with no safeguards such as a Code of Ethics to follow. They do not have the permission of their subjects, Seniors, to be used in a Human Experiment. Have Seniors been informed they're in an Experiment.

Will individual Seniors be denied their license and labeled as unfit, by lies, as I was, if they confront the Policy?

Will ICBC allow seniors a Temporary license while they confront Bond, Martin, Howie, and their new illegal policy against Seniors? What will happen if they accuse Dobbs and her husband of running a non – Sanctioned Human Experiment, which is a Crime Against Humanity?

Will Seniors, as Martin threatened me with, be forced to explain themselves in front of a Review Board for not bowing down to Martin and kissing his ass, as I wrote I would not do?



I should explain the last sentence above; Sexual Harassment for Domination.

Carter, I really did use the back room banter that comes from boys in Power that have had their Power challenged.

The best way to attack, assault, and demonstrate who's Boss is to confront the another man, in their macho “view” of life, by attacking the man sexually; to belittle and humiliate the man confronting their “view” of life. Don't forget, all of Martin's other charades and lies have not stopped me from demanding my Rights as a Canadian, Human, and Diabetic. Martin really was telling me I needed to kiss his ass, that he is “The Boss”, and he will run this illegal policy inspite of the demands of the Charter, the HR Code, the MVA, and his Oath of Office, as has been proved by the past ten years of denial coming from other people, the Canadian Diabetes Association, organizations, unions, and the Press being afraid of him and his corrupt colleagues.

Carter, you know, or should know, about the boys in the back room and how they talk. There should be no doubt Martin was showing me who was Boss and if I wanted my license renewed I would need to fulfill his demand due to the arbitrary change of diabetes Classification from type 2 to type 1, insulin dependent. He didn't have the Right to do this. It was just an attack upon me for exposing his illegal policy to gov't and the world, as I was still writing, exposing him and his buddies, his little group of Gangsters. The language is about 'how Jenkins would need to kiss his ass to keep his license' and when I refused to kneel for him and complete the Driver's Medical Examination, DME, he had ICBC cancel my license; no Temporary license was offered until this inquiry was resolved. Why? ICBC gives out thousands of Temporary licenses.

Due to my refusal to kiss his ass Martin escalated his attack by further falsifying documents, by writing that it had been reported to him that I was seen driving while under cancellation and that I was also proved to be unfit, therefore he was using his power to Permanently cancel my license with the “Notice of Prohibition”, which meant I would need to be Examined by some Review Board, and he then cancelled my license for an unspecified time, which the staff at the ICBC licensing department could not explain, as it seems there's always a timeline given for cancellation of this type.

In my letter concerning all this, not only did I address the aspect of ass – kissing but as Martin escalated his deviant behaviour toward me, lying I was driving, labeling me as unfit, cancelling my license for an unspecified time, and forcing me to go under interrogation from some friends of his on a Review Board, he was inturn escalating his sexual attack upon me, where I needed to respond in kind, so the world would know the depth of his depravity. I acknowledged the escalation of the sexual aspect of his attack by making it very clear I would not perform Fellatio or bend over his desk to be Sodomized to have my license returned.

Carter, this sexual harassment is real, it's about Power through Harassment and Degradation, as other means failed to put me in “my Place”, a person with no Charter, Human, or Motor Vehicle Act Rights. This is no different than gay bashing, female sexual harassment, and the bullying we are now reading and hearing about in the Press concerning our Children, female RCMP, and Senior Abuse.

So, as I haven't bowed to their attacks, lies, hate, and sexual attacks where does this leave them? What's the Big Idea here Carter? I've confronted their bias, hate, fear and loathing, disgust, contempt, discrimination, prejudice, and bigotry for ten years now and as a Canadian I'm Right in what I do, it's Just, and there is enormous Public Good, and Martin and his corrupt supporters are not doing the same for Canada and Humanity. Then I'm attacked by corrupt officials in Manitoba.

Carter, how do they stop me, how do they get rid of me? Road kill while I walk?

I must be well known to the Public or have been followed by a private investigator to have been seen driving and then this illegal act been reported to Martin? (Driving after cancellation would have been more than civil disobedience, it would have been against the law, I would have turned into them, and I would have been punished. It didn't happen.) With an investigation to see if I was driving this means they know where I walk and how often, as I don't drive somewhere to walk. Or was this another lie about me driving, just another perverted Power charade to have me believe they were investigating me, stalking me, and hunting me personally compared to being hunted as a Diabetic? Martin lied about me driving or I've really been stalked by him. One way or the other it's really just another Psychological charade contrived to Harm? How many people do you think this illegal policy has killed in Emerge and of those waiting for surgery to have these people do this to me? Killing me, killing me is just something they're waiting for, the Right time, isn't it.



Is this what's to happen to Seniors if they do not comply to Martin's new illegal policy? What would seniors do, how would they demonstrate they changed their behavior in order to drive, as they had not been found unfit to begin with, before the illegal Psychological Examination? Are seniors to do what I was supposed to do, explain why I wouldn't undergo an illegal DME? How would they explain why they wouldn't comply to the fascist Psychological Examination in order to drive, other than the examine is against the law and as it's a Human Experiment they have the Right not be involved in it. Do you think the Review Board would accept this bona fide reason for not complying to Bond, Martin and Howie's illegal examination?

Do you think the MLA and the Press that I've sent the enclosed letters to will be allowed to follow up on their reports concerning Senior Abuse? (They won't be allowed to, but at least they now know the why and how of the Policy.) Aren't unproven, unguided psychological experiments against the law in a Democracy, in Canada, on the Planet? Who are these people, Martin, Howie, Bond, Dobbs and her husband to do this to anyone, little lone Seniors? These corrupt Politicians and senior Public Servants care nothing for Life, or Law, or anything Sacred. These people are the monsters of the Human Species.

Carter, what about your parents and their driving and Emerge visits? What about your kids, parents, partner, or husband in an Emerge facility? I've been there with my wife's parents and my parents, and a daughter and it's not very nice, especially when you know the “why” of the Overcrowding and the denial of what is happening by so many Canadians and Internationals I've written to.

People should be Afraid of Dobbs and her husband, Bond, Martin, Howie, and their supporters, as they are troubled people and have deep psychological problems, but this Fear needs to be confronted and they need to expose them before they kill their parents, children, friends, husband, partner, grandparents, our Universal Health Care System, and of course the naïve bystander in all this, the Senior.

The Premier and Bond have children, these children or their children may end up in an Overcrowded Emerge and die, it's a type of Infanticide; they've had the opportunity to change their behaviour and haven't. Their children and grandchildren don't get sick? They'll be in denial of what they did, as they are in denial of what they're doing today.

*



Something else to think about concerning Seniors

Where do people get information about Seniors to use against them?

The politician and the reporters, that I mention above, who have just written about seniors and exposed this new anti – senior driving policy is 'Proved to be Needed' by whom? It's supported by the same people that I've been confronting and exposing and have recently been attacked by.

A Big Idea, bear with me as Dobbs needs to be set up again. Dobbs, the “academic researcher” and “Dr.” that I caught stealing research and other materials, who breached Copyright and Intellectual Property Rights Protection devices, lied about having permission to use the research and other materials, falsified an Affidavit, broke the Trust of an Affidavit, sent the stolen material through the mail, which is Mail fraud, broke her Oath of Office, broke the Trust of the Social Contract, broke the accepted Standards of World Science, mislead about fulfilling the demands of the Charter, HR Code, and MVA, failed to acknowledge the Harm of the Policy she recommended, failed to prove any Good coming from the Policy she recommended, failed to acknowledge what Diabetics already do for their Personal health and the Public's health, and failed to acknowledge she had never studied or researched Diabetes, the consequences of Diabetes, and diabetes driving, is now presenting against Seniors, the very people she studies. Her qualifications need to be studied for bona fide (ness).

Dobbs' actions were a conscious act on her behalf to breach all the above; she is not a naïve bystander. She chose to help cover – up an illegal policy known to harm. She used her Status, Prestige, and Power to manipulate and deceive. She enjoyed doing what she did. She willing joined a gang of white collar workers and they guaranteed to protect her. This was her 'initiation act' into the gang. Nothing happened to her, they protected her, and gave her a new job. She's now allowed to run her own Experiment with her husband; more Money and Power for the household; more Money and Power for the Gang. She states she's studied Seniors, enough for the Government and herself to label herself as the Expert. By default she knows how to harm Seniors. She's hunting Seniors for their liabilities, their weakness', spotting them for her husband. She pronounces herself as the Master Hunter, providing fodder for her husband's computer toy, the unproven instrument of modification and psychological alteration; all labeled as a new Policy but really a unsanctioned Human Experiment collecting data for Dobbs to prove a Need for a Policy or to lie that the data has been collected by bona fide means therefore justifying the Policy, all done to list another title on her Resume while she enjoys the hunt concerning her subjects.

What happens to Seniors when their Psychological Being is modified or altered through Stress, Fear, and the Unknown? Dobbs will know, as she's the Expert. As with her conscious decisions to breach the above Laws, Standards of Science, and Medicine she is again breaching Standards knowing the harm.

A Big Idea. The question is not, “Is Dobbs going to abuse Seniors?”, but “How?”

Is Dobbs really Trustworthy? She's proven she's not. Trustworthy enough for our “democratic society” to base a Social Policy upon a very specific Class of People, Seniors, without questioning and scrutinization, to understand if the Policy is needed, has fulfilled the demands of the Charter, the Human Rights Code, and the Motor Vehicle Act and really does Good? No, she's not. She proved she's not Trustworthy, as she did not fulfill these demands for the diabetic policy; she consciously decided not to fulfill these legal and social demands even knowing the harm. She's a member of this Group – Think, Wrong – Thinking Politicians and senior Public Servants that has put themselves above the laws of Canada, B C, and Humanity. The Solicitor General, Bond, has also proved she's not Trustworthy, as she never fired Dobbs for the above.

We infer Dobbs has complied with the Standards of Science, as she uses her credentials for Power and Trust, but she's proven she cares nothing for the Standards of Science when selling herself for Money, Status, Prestige, and Power. After the theft of the Science and breach of Affidavit we need to severely scrutinize All her work for bona fide (ness) and legality, to see if she had permission from other Scientists and the owners of research to use their knowledge to justify her actions and support concerning an unproven Social Policy. Why should anyone believe she is qualified for anything after she has been caught stealing and falsifying documents for Government?

Dobbs studies Seniors, what impacts them, and how that impact influences Seniors, affect to effect. She absolutely knows what arbitrary demands, unknowns, fear, and stress have upon Seniors, as she declares herself, The Expert.

We now know that she and her criminal “view” of life are involved in this attack upon Seniors, with her husband, a new player in this corruption. He's also been put on a pedestal by Solicitor General Bond and those in the OSMV, Martin and Howie, and proclaimed as another expert. By default he knows what his wife did with the theft of Science and breach of Affidavit, as he's also involved in Science. He knows his wife broke with the Standards of Science. Did he find employment with the OSMV due to his wife, as she was hired to justify the diabetic policy through any means? Which she did, got caught, and did not get fired. He learned he could do anything to Seniors and would not be charged or loose his job, as his wife was not charged with anything, little lone loose her job. He knows he can run his Human Experiment on Seniors, have his wife take notes, and come out the other end deceptively pronouncing his computer toy as bona fide, proved through a Government Experiment, where his wife recorded the needed documentation.

But it won't be bona fide, as it's an unsanctioned, unethical Human Experiment and his computer toy has not been proved to be able to do what he and his wife state it can do. How many Seniors have died from his Human Experiment, as its playing out now? How many in the next few years?



Big Idea. Carter, it must be asked; “Is this why Dobbs got her job, as not one “academic researcher” or “Dr.” in B C would steal documents and breach an Affidavit for the B C Government? Was Dobbs the only “academic researcher” in Canada, as she comes from Alberta, that would steal Science and breach an Affidavit to receive permanent employment from the B C Government?” and “Does this also apply to her husband?” and “Will he do what Solicitor General Bond, Martin, and Howie tell him to do, legal or not, moral or not, and ethical or not?”

Dobbs will not change her behaviour after crossing the line as she has done. She went to far and will not come back. Maybe Bond, Martin, Howie, and their colleagues won't let her go. No, Dobbs chose to do this. She and her husband will continue with their deviant behaviour, as has been proved, as the new Senior Driver Policy has not been justified, or has the intervention been proved as needed, or that it can do what it's alleged to be able to do. It's just more lies from Bond, Martin, and Howie and we know they have not changed their behaviour, it has only worsened. We can expect the same for Dobbs and her husband, as they are learning from the other gang members and are generously rewarded.

*



The Future for Senior Drivers and Health Care

Big Idea, where is their behaviour to lead us now considering Seniors? What does this Senior Abuse spill over into? As this phoney Science is used to run Social Policy now, what are they going to do in the future? What aspect of Senior life will they attack and experiment on next? It's the Ministry of “Public Safety”, but their behaviour is killing and maiming the Public today.

Is this where these sociopaths and psychopaths are going to take us:

Phase One: “A new Social Policy from the Ministry of Public Policy and Solicitor General's Office, Scientifically proved to be needed by our own “academic researchers” will be implemented, as Seniors drive to slow and cause Road Rage from younger drivers intervention is needed. Therefore, if Seniors what to drive they will need to take the appropriate milligram dose of Methamphetamine to crankup their awareness and reaction time, therefore driving speed.”

Phase Two: “If Seniors are involved in a driver mishap, they will be kept alive, but in a comma, for parts, as the UHCS is lacking G Ps and funding for surgery time and no one knows where they and taxes have gone.”

Phase Three: “Seniors will now be stacked eight or ten to a room in UHCS Senior Facilities, instead of the two today, and will be mandated nose plugs and mouth guards for snoring, have their I - Pods turned up, and will be given Dobbs' husband's new version of his mind altering, Professional Psychological Behaviour Enhancement Computer Toy, now mounted on 3D glasses, but really only used for intellectual stimulation. This is being done as the present day Senior Facilities have not been able to keep up with the Baby Boomer bubble of Senior and UHCS needs, as new gov't demands upon the UHCS has seen funds redirected for Public Policy impacting those under seventy years of age (The new retirement age, up from 67.)”.



Where are these psychopaths and sociopaths trying to take us? The above are no less insane that what they are doing now.

Carter, surely your Recommendations touch on such ideas, so we don't follow those that I'm exposing and their Group – Think and Wrong – Thinking. They're Fascist and Nazi “view” of Life.

*

Again, as Dobbs and her husband are running a Human Experiment All his credentials need to be severely scrutinized.

Have they really been sanctioned to run a Human Experiment? Who's the Watch dog or organization that manages for adherence to the Code of Ethics? Has the National Research Council of Canada approved Dobbs and her husband's experiment, so that Genocide does not even haphazardly express? One death is too many.

Has the NRCC reviewed and approved his compliance to the Code of Ethics concerning research and Human Experiments? Have other Human Watch organizations approved their experiment on Humans? Where's the Thesis statement, Aim, Procedure, and the Code of Ethics that experiments are managed by?

Why didn't Dobbs and Bond offer these to the MLA and Press when they were being interviewed on Feb 8, 2012? If they had these Instruments of Permission and Bona fide (ness) they would have produced them as any bona fide Scientist would have. They didn't offer anything as they know they're running an illegal policy; contrary to the laws of Canada and the laws of Humanity; they're experimenting on Humans under the lie that the action is a bona fide Social Policy.



A Big Idea, I'll set Dobbs up again. Dobbs' personal research information is Copyright and Intellectual Property Rights protected as she does research for Universities, the USA gov't, business, etc and she does Not want what she did to them to happen to her; liability from illegal use of Research. She used her personal research, research done for others, protected by them as well, so did Dobbs really have the Right to use it to justify Social Policy? So, Dobbs will use her personal research to justify her employment and feigning the Right to use it, but how much is owned by her employers, such as the USA Department of Transportation? Just because her name's on the research doesn't mean she has permission to use a Foreign Government's research to justify our Diabetic Social Policy. What's she putting forward with her attack upon Seniors?

Dobbs will sell her information and use it to procure work, as she may own some of it, as this is why she does research; but what she did to me and millions of diabetics proves she does not do this as something altruistic or for the betterment of society or Humanity, as she stole Science, breached the Affidavit, and has never researched or wrote about Diabetes. She feigned bona fide (ness), as she feigns what's she's doing now with her work with Senior drivers. Is she really making the world a better place or just her life a little better due to fact that she now lives off my taxes? My point is, most of her listed research in her Resume Letter that she presented in my Human Rights Discrimination compliant was financed by other sources, all protecting their investment against illegal use and its consequences. She used it anyway, behind their backs, she got paid for doing so by our Government. This means she stole off her employers, from those that commissioned her to research, which means they lost revenue for a use they had not sanctioned, if they wanted to sell the research it's their option not Dobbs' to use it behind their backs and get paid for doing so by our Government. Any use should have seen the owners compensated. This theft also placed the owners in danger of damages.

So, Dobbs stole off her employees and placed them in harms way, which means she needs to be investigated as to what she is now doing to Seniors.

Secondly, what's her husband doing with his computer toy. How deep are his lies about the bona fide (ness) of his computer toy? How much is he being paid for an instrument that has never been proved as bona fide? This action by Bond and the Dobbs' is defined as flimflam, “a piece of nonsense, a swindle or confidence game involving skillful persuasion or clever manipulation of the victim”. (Websters Encyclopedic Unabridged Dictionary of the English Language)

As it's a Psychological toy, used to evaluate and change Human Behaviour, has it been reviewed by the Canadian Psychological Society for bona fide (ness) and harm? Has it been reviewed by the Canadian Medical Association for bona fide (ness)? All this is not explained or freely given to prove their bona fide (ness), which means they're lying, misleading, misrepresenting and misinforming as to their actions.

Third, it must be remembered that Dobbs and her husband will present all their research, within a Resume, in an effort to justify her so called expertize against seniors and his as an expert in computer toys that can prove Psychological and Physical inadequates of Seniors. No different than Dobbs did with me, but I actually read her Resume, there was 32 pages of stuff she had done in her life; this dissuades people from reading the Resume and they just accept the presentation as bona fide due to Status and Power coming with Science and the Government presenting Dobbs as the Expert; but we know she certainly is not a Medical Doctor nor is she an “academic researcher” involved in diabetes. That's Right, I discovered she'd never studied diabetes, type 1 or type 2, or hypoglycemia, the very reason for the diabetic policy, nor was she a diabetic, nor had she studied diabetes in Seniors, as a side bar to her original Senior research. She had not studied nor published peer reviewed papers concerning the task at hand, and yet she was put forward as the Expert. The diabetic policy is played out due to hypoglycemia in relation to the difference in driver mishaps between diabetic drivers and non – diabetic drivers. Dobbs used her position as “academic researcher” and senior Public Servant to mislead and misrepresent concerning her Expertize in the illegal Diabetic Driver's Policy and its Consequences. Dobbs tried to Bullshit me with Bullshit and got caught. This behaviour demands severe scrutinization of the research she presents as the Expert against Seniors concerning their Psychological and Physical inadequates and the ability of her intervention to be able do anything.

This same severe scrutinization needs to be applied to her husband's credentials also, as she is putting him forward.

Fourth, as with diabetes does Dobbs and her husband really have Legal Right to use what the Science and other material they put forward as justifying their Position as Experts? Have the owners been contacted that she and her husband are using their research to justify an unproven, unneeded Social Policy against Seniors that harms them?

Does Dobbs and her husband have permission to use protected science to base their Human Experiment upon?

Lastly, once again, Dobbs, a senior Public Servant hires her husband and puts him forward as an expert, as he has some unproven computer toy that he's offering to correct the harm senior drivers are causing, supposedly coming from bona fide research. However, Dobbs mislead about the diabetes Policy, which really is an ongoing Human Experiment run amuck and she knows this, not just a bona fide Policy, which forces us to question what she and her husband, as the Experts, are really doing; just implementing an already bona fide Policy against seniors, or running an Experiment under the lie it's all just a Policy. Their behaviour informs us it's just another illegal unsanctioned Human Experiment, and by their self proclaimed expertise they know what they're really doing; experimenting on Seniors to prove their computer toy is bona fide in order to claim Prestige and Status in the Scientific community in order to mass market the phoney psychological medical instrument. (Flimflamery at its best.)

*



The Big Idea of the Circle Game of “Unfitness”

Once again, any Government intervention into the Public's life, needs to be proved as Needed and to offer Good. As with the diabetic policy, it's hard to prove Good if there is no problem to begin with, therefore Seniors are forced into the position of defending themselves from an indefensible position. This well thought out Circle Game was contrived to harass and stymy diabetics in their Inquiry about the policy, as presented by the personal “unfitness” game Martin attacked me with, and now presented against Seniors. It's corruption by corrupt Politicians and senior Public Servants all done to waylay the demands of the Carter, HR Code, the MVA and their Oaths of Office. It exemplifies how deep these people's Group – Think and Wrong – Thinking is.

The following is another Big Idea, concerning Wrong – Thinking. Dobbs gives or sells her research to her husband to justify his behaviour, but as we know Dobbs stole research and falsified an Affidavit, etc, etc, which forces us to ask, “Is her research really bona fide and legally useable?”

This needs to be asked of Dobbs, as her husband is justifying his behaviour upon her behaviour, which we know is absolutely corrupt, even without evaluating her research, which is based upon Bond, Martin, and Howie's behaviour and their corruption and perverted “view” of life; proved by their refusal to fulfill the demands of the Charter, HR Code, and MVA; based upon these people “just” saying diabetics are “Unfit” and dangerous and need managing. Dobbs is saying “they” did it, therefore “I” can do it, therefore “her husband” can do it. It's just another style of Circle Game or Circle Argument.

Now for the new Seniors Policy. Bond, Martin, and Howie are “just” saying Seniors are Unfit are dangerous and need managing through Psychological Examinations. Dobbs is saying my husband and I can run an Experiment as I exposed diabetics as unfit and we're running that unsanctioned, unethical Human Experiment, that's known to harm. So, now Dobbs and her husband are now running another unsanctioned, unethical Human Experiment. Based upon “what”? Based upon Bond, Martin, and Howie and we know they are corrupt. Based upon their “view” of life, as the diabetic policy is based upon.

They've labeled the diabetic as unfit and how is the diabetic able to prove fitness when nothing has been offered to exemplify unfitness; that's what these people did. Martin lied and stated I was unfit. He didn't list how I was unfit only that I would be Professionally Reviewed by his buddies. Now they label Seniors unfit. All based upon the other guy did it, so I can do it. This is how Fascists and Nazis tried to justify their horrors and illegal Experiments.

So we have two steps; play the Circle Game, the Mind Game, of unproven Unfitness, which the Public cannot prove against the corrupt Government. The second step is the “she did it, so I did it” Mind game. This exemplifies the Group – Think of Wrong – Thinking that is not acceptable in the World; well, in “democratic societies” anyway, or supposedly.

The War Crimes Trials of WW 2 did not allow this kind of behaviour as justifiable reason for breaching Laws and Laws of Humanity; the tired old excuses of, “They told me it was ok to do.” and “They did it, so I did it.”.

There should be no doubt that this is how these people are defending themselves, going around in the Circle Game of defense. Playing Mind games of denial and accountability. He said, so I said. He did, so I did. Children's talk, children's behaviour on the playground, children learning the power of language, but these are not children. It leads to the wrong actions doesn't it, coming from false accusation, leading to bullying, attacks, assaults, internet attacks, and killing all done by Group – Think of Wrong – Thinking. This is not acceptable in Canada, in the World. It was played out in the old Socialist States, Fascist and Nazi Germany, with the breakup of Yugoslavia, and China today with their attacks upon Religions they don't like, the vulnerable, the Press, and Artists they're Afraid of. Canada's monsters are attacking diabetics, the disabled, and now Seniors.

*

Again, is Dobbs' research bona fide, peer reviewed, for authenticity and proven bona fide (ness) to prove she can evaluate and run a Human Experiment? She's lied about diabetes. Is her research really good enough to base her husband's Social – Psychological testing upon?

This needs to be said again as we are “Not Allowed” to be Quiet about Hate Crimes. This examination is being forced upon Seniors that want to drive, but driving in Canada is not a Right but a Privilege, but the Privilege to not drive has not been legally justified, nothing has been offered to prove unfitness. Nor has the Examination been proved to be able to resolved the unknown need. This charade is no different than the diabetic Policy, its Phoney Driver's Medical Examination and Form, and failure to prove Good.

Seniors comply because they will be denied driving privileges and end up in a Bureaucratic nightmare of Government incompetency due to the corruption within the Solicitor General's Office and the OSMV, and the refusal of ICBC to challenge the S G's Office and the OSMV, as happened with me. Seniors have not been found unfit by bona fide Science, but by Hate. How are Seniors to prove they are fit, when they have Not been found unfit? Has the acknowledgment of their personal Health Care been denied, as my Diabetic Health Care is still denied today? Fascists and Nazis did this to people they did not like. This is the same twisted psychological Wrong – Thinking Martin attacked me with; I was being forced to appear in front of a Review Board to prove I was not unfit, but I had not been found unfit, so how was I to prove I was not unfit. This is why I told him and his buddies I would not kiss his ass and then the Review Board stated they did not know what I was concerned about trying to prove fitness from unfitness. Or did they have a re – think about what they were doing? Maybe not all is corrupt. Or did Martin lie about what he had done? However, according to ICBC licensing staff I would need to be Reviewed as Martin's “Notice of Prohibition” forces a Review.

Canadians need to support Seniors confront and expose the Hate they have found themselves within, coming from Bond, Martin, Howie, Dobbs and her husband and their colleagues. It is Hate as the policy comes from nothing else.

Will Dobbs really record the horrific consequences that this illegal Human Social – Psychological Experiment has upon Seniors; yes and no. Yes, as how else will they justify her husband's phoney computer toy for marketing in the future? No, because, as they are corrupt, they will not record the Harm. They won't record the killing as their actions concerning the diabetic policy exemplifies. How many do they kill and maime before they stop? They won't stop, as the diabetes and disabled policy proves. Thousands to come, as they haven't stopped the illegal diabetic and disabled policies that I've been confronting and they know they killed thousands over the past ten years.

All the people involved in this illegal phoney attack upon Seniors need to be exposed and fired from Public Service and charged with breach of Oath of Office, Treason, and charged with a Crime Against Humanity.

Lastly, this new policy against Seniors is a working example of “Senior Abuse” that the Canadian Government is now running TV commercials about, in order to expose and stop the abuse, and on the other hand we have a Provincial Government that is doing just that, selecting Seniors for Abuse and running illegal unsanctioned Psychological Experiments upon them.

Carter, it's not the Seniors that have Psychological problems but those Experimenting upon them. An Amendment to your Report would surely stop this Hate Crime.

*



The Elephant in the Room: Canadian Diabetes Association

The Canadian Diabetes Association, CDA, knows the Diabetic Drivers' Policy is illegal and by default they know of the harm, as I also informed them of what the Ministry of Health's real Medical Doctor stated. I asked why they didn't confront the gov't about this illegal policy that harms, knowing the Driver's Medical Examination cannot do what it's alleged to be able to do, knowing the policy does no Good, and knowing the illegal policy sets the diabetic up as a Social Pariah. And most importantly knowing I visit the G P every three months for bona fide diabetic care, which is never acknowledged by Martin, Howie, or the Government. These questions and statement about diabetic care were never responded to. Why?



The response from the CDA was, sad to say, supportive of the illegal, unjust, discriminatory, and defamatory policy. They're Afraid of the monsters I've run into. It's as if the CDA staff feel dirty and unclean for having diabetes and what is happening to them is acceptable; the illegal policy, all its lies, and harm coming from the anti – diabetic lobby, and the corrupted Group – Think and Wrong – Thinking of corrupt Politicians and senior Public Servants . Acceptable even though Government and its senior Public Servants had not fulfilled the demands of the Charter, the Human Rights Code, the Motor Vehicle Act, and their Oaths of Office. These people have been abused more than I understand to give up their Charter Rights, Human Rights, and Rights under the Motor Vehicle Act. They've turned their backs on life and sided with their enemies; maybe this is a style or form of Stockholm Syndrome? This is how Fascism and Treason creeps into our “democratic society”.



Big Ideas. Carter, think about how abused and brow beaten these people are to accept this policy as a way of life; that they're such freaks and fiends in our “democratic society” that the Laws of Canada do not need to be fulfilled by Government and its senior Public Servants in order to restrain and suppress these 'out of control', disease ridden diabetics. That not only is the corruption of Law acceptable to control the diabetics, themselves, but the consequences of the Intervention do not need to be acknowledged, publicly that is; that death and maiming of naïve bystanders is an acceptable consequence of their condition and their want or need to drive. The consequences from the lies about diabetics are not acceptable as a way of life.

That the policy and its consequences are acceptable to fulfill any needs for the Privilege to drive, as drivers in Canada do not have the Right to drive only the Privileged to drive, is Wrong – Thinking on the diabetics behalf. They, as mentioned above, are caught up in the false accusations of “unfitness” and living in the twisted psychological mind games some very disturbed Politicians and senior Public Servants are playing for their own deep seated corrupt desires.



So, the diabetic accepts the breach of our “democratic society”(s) laws, phoney medical exams, the death and maiming of the naïve bystander all because they believe they are the monster and live with the fear that if they say anything they may be banned from driving or attacked as I've been. The real Monsters are the Politicians and senior Public Servants doing this to them. The Press for hiding this. Those I've contacted as they have also turned their backs on Democratic Atrocities.

Again, this is also wrong Group – Think and Wrong – Thinking on the diabetics behalf. The demands of Law must be fulfilled in order for government to make demands of the Public and the gov't hasn't done it. Just for Diabetes this means approximately 3 000 000 people in Canada. If the research was there to prove a need for the Policy and there was Good it would have been presented and I would not be here. People like Bond, Martin, and Howie have not done their jobs by fulfilling the demands of Law before they implement Social Policy. So, they All lie and deny what they are doing. The diabetic is abused and the killing and maiming continues, and now they've begun on Seniors, as even the CDA will not confront them. I wonder how many Seniors are diabetic, therefore not supported by the CDA, as Seniors?

*

What the Government, its senior Public Servants, and some in the CDA are saying is that diabetics need controlling at any cost to Democracy and Human Rights. They're liars. They're Traitors to Canada and Humanity, as they've acted upon that perverted, twisted, amoral, unethical “view” of life that they base the Policy upon. To accept the consequences of their actions some Politicians and senior Public Servants have balanced off their Constructed killing, that they accept their Emerge killing and maiming and surgery wait – time killing and maiming as acceptable, because in their “view” the diabetic driver is so dangerous to society and is killing people at such an unacceptable rate draconian measures are needed to control them. This control is needed as they cannot implement a complete Ban upon diabetic drivers, due to our Charter of Rights and Freedoms and Human Rights Laws. So, with one hand they acknowledge the laws of Canada and with the other they deceive and feign compliance with the laws and force phoney DME upon the diabetic.

So, what they do is attack diabetics with their Mind Game, or Circle Game, of Unfitness, and accept the consequences of the death of the naïve bystander in Emerge and the CDA won't challenge this. Why?



They've acted out their corrupt Group – Think and Wrong – Thinking, their anti – democratic “view” of life, and their anti – humanistic “view” of life in Opposition to the Demands and Objectives of the Crown. That's why these people are also Traitors. Those managing the CDA are not naïve bystanders to the Laws of Canada and Humanity, so what's that make them?



Big Idea and Scale. Diabetes impacts 10% of Society, and most of us are drivers. 99 other medical conditions are said to be monitored, which is what? At only 1% of Society each, our whole Society is monitored. Now add what percent of Society for Seniors as they're probably being monitored, which means their G P already monitors them already. What's happening to our Charter and Human Rights, as it seems all drivers are forced to undergo phoney driving medical exams for the corruption within the Government concerning the auto business and yet drivers already monitor themselves with medical care? Who is threatening whom?

Ten percent, (10%) of the CDA funding comes from Government. They know it will disappear if they complain for my Rights. We are not allowed to be naïve and not believe this.

My Rights have been suspended as if Canada was once again in the middle of the FLQ Quiet Revolution where Trudeau suspended Rights under the War Measures Act, where Civil Liberties were suspended. There is no War here, where the FLQ were considered traitors for their kidnappings and bombings and demand for Rights. The Traitors here are the corrupt Politicians and senior Public Servants involved in this suspension of Civil Rights or Liberties, or more properly my Rights under the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, the Human Rights Code, the Motor Vehicle Act, and Rights I have that Public Servants are obeying their Oath of Office even though no one is watching them. This suspension of Rights impacts 3 000 000 diabetics in Canada and now add the other 99 medical conditions these monsters say they're monitoring for the betterment of Canada. And the CDA is quiet about this. Who threatened the CDA with what?

*

Big Idea, Scale, Connections, and Context. It's falsely stated that the policy is needed as diabetic drivers kill and maime more people than non – diabetic drivers. This higher rate of killing and maiming that is assigned to diabetics, by Bond, Martin, Howie, and the anti – diabetic lobby, used to instill fear and loathing of the diabetic, and used to justify their demands upon the diabetic and the UHCS has not been proved.

Carter, it is not that diabetic drivers are not involved in driver mishaps where someone dies but that, on average, diabetic drivers kill more people than non – diabetic drivers; this has never been proved. As a matter of fact, Science proves there is no difference in driver mishaps between type 2s and non – diabetic drivers, whom are 95 – 97% of diabetics.

Today, with the increase of diabetes to 10% of society, type 2s may be 99% of diabetics. Type 1 is an insignificant number of the total number of diabetics and a greater insignificant number compared to society, a greater insignificance when compared to driving as a whole. I have not been able to discover the difference between each of the other 99 medical conditions monitored, only data compared to non – diabetic drivers. I do not know the why of this. As stated above, if medical conditions, on average, are 1% of Society each, there is not a non – medical condition People, (lets call them “Straight People”, so who are these non – diabetic people that I'm compared to? There may be more diabetics than Straight People. So, with that understanding of the driver mishaps and who really is what how many driver mishaps do Straight People really have for a bona fide comparison? I have not found anything concerning this. Why? With no facts offered by Government the lies, accusations, prejudice, and bigotry carry the day. So, with such insignificant numbers for type 1s and no real comparisons made for type 2s where does the bias, fear and loathing, hate, discrimination, prejudice, and bigotry come from? It's contrived by very psychologically twisted people. Psychopaths and sociopaths as they know what they're doing is illegal and harms.

Carter, I could not during my early Inquiry 1999 – 2002, nor today, find any list or complete list of deaths caused by diabetic drivers. Online ICBC records offers no such thing. The CDA offers no such thing. The B C Government, and the Solicitor General's Office and OSMV offers no such thing. I could find Press reports of diabetics involved in driver mishaps where someone was killed but nothing that diabetics are killing at a higher rate than non – diabetics. This killing presentation is just another “unfit” Circle Argument. And the bias from the Press is criminal to say the least.

I cannot find bona fide research which proves diabetic drivers need to be banned from driving or undergo special DME because they are driver mishap prone, especially in the area of driver mishaps where someone died. As the OSMV states it monitors approximately 100 medical conditions because they are deemed unfit I looked for driving records of driver mishaps to compare to diabetic driver mishaps but nothing was offered. My point is, diabetics are compared to non – diabetic drivers, but non – diabetic drivers consist of the the other 99 medical conditions listed as monitored and what ever is left of “Straight People”; with 100 medical conditions monitored I don't think there are many Straight People compared to non – Straight People.

Charter, if you don't have one of these medical conditions you belong to a Minority in Society, a Minority of Drivers. Have you ever thought of yourself this way? It's the Right – Thinking of how to understand driving and medical conditions. When you challenge Group – Think and Wrong – Thinking with something like the above, Facts, one comes to understand how corrupt and manipulative these people are and how cowardly the CDA is.

Without any documents explaining all this one can see how the diabetic policy is based upon bias, hate, ignorance, fear and loathing, disgust, contempt, discrimination, prejudice, and bigotry, as people like Bond, Martin, and Howie base actions on their “view” of life, not what's actually happening and can be proved. It's just more of the sick game of “unfitness” and “the other guy did it to the diabetic, so I can do it, and the CDA says nothing, so I can do it”. And the CDA knows all this.

On the other hand we have Emerge doctors calling Press Conferences about the Overcrowding in Emerge where the Overcrowding is not explained other than through the consequences of illegal gov't policies that impact most of Society.

Carter, what we have with the above is just another accusation of “unfitness” debunked or Deconstructed for what it really is; lies, misinformation, and corruption. How do diabetics prove unknown differences in driver mishaps when there is no data to support the accusation and when non – diabetic is not defined by those that have the resources and data to prove such things. Again, how many are “Straight People”, as they are supposed to be the underpinnings for comparison to? They do not prove anything because they would loose Power over the diabetic and the Public and be disgraced for not being honest to the Public after lying and corrupting our country, etc, etc. They would also loose their jobs if they were honest, as then there would not be a need for so many idiots in the OSMV, many would be fired for breaching their Oath of Office, some may get jail time, as just maybe their nice little Gang would begin to fall apart due to stress of retribution.

It's hard to believe the CDA management, that are so knowledgeable of life, do not know the above.

*

Fact 1: “No” documents stolen by Dobbs, 180 about diabetes and stuff related and 20 on the Thyroid Gland, as the thyroid gland is involved in metabolism, which involves the production of carbohydrates or not, proved or justified this lie of a higher rate of killing or even the actual killing rate of diabetic drivers compared to non – diabetic drivers or any Class of driver. Also, important to know, the 180 articles may have been the majority of diabetic research articles ever done.

Fact 2: if there was such articles on killing Dobbs would have presented them or it, stolen or not. She offered nothing. Why? Because it's not there. Additionally, it's not Grand enough to study, little lone keep records of, and yet we keep records of drunks don't we. What other killing rates by Straights do we record? Bona fide question.

Fact 3: There isn't much research on type 2 drivers because there is no need for it, as it has been proved that there is no difference in driver mishaps and that's why diabetics are not discriminated against with auto Insurance rates. If there was a problem or difference in driver mishaps Insurance costs would be different, or denied, and there would be more type 2 research. Of the 180 articles Dobbs stole not more than five or six were related to type 2 and it was not laziness on her side that she could not find more. She even had the research I used to prove no difference. Think about that slipperiness. The CDA knows this about type 2.



Fact 4: Again, from The “Big Idea” of Death and “Scale”, p 24 – 26:

1 death a month is 12 Human deaths a year, x the 10 busiest hospitals in B C is 120 deaths a year x the 10 years I've been writing is 1 200 deaths due to unexplained Emerge Overcrowding, which is caused by illegal gov't policy such as, the illegal diabetic driver's policy.

Now the real horror of this Wrong – Thinking begins. Think Scale again Carter. Because these driving policies are National and B C is approximately 12% of Canada we need to multiply this death toll by 8. This gives us 9 600 Human deaths caused by illegal gov't policy at only one (1) death a month from the ten (10) busiest Emerge facilities. Now add all the other Emerge deaths caused by Overcrowding, where the Overcrowding may only express during weekends or holidays.



A Big Idea, Scale, and Connections. Carter, if diabetic drivers were killing 120 people a year or 1 200 people over the past ten years don't you think something would have been done?

Wouldn't ICBC, Emerge doctors, and the Coroner's reports have been used to ban diabetic drivers? Wouldn't an Epidemiological study been done, as I asked for, ten years ago? It wasn't done, as it would have proved the Politicians and senior Public Servants are the problem, not the diabetic or disabled driver.

Carter, 10% of society is diabetic, go to a hockey game, 15 000 people, 1 500 diabetics. Do you see them flipping around on the floor like a salmon out of water, passing out while lining up for a hot dog, smashing into the carpark concrete light fixture, crashing parked cars as if in a pinball game, running over people, etc, etc? No, you don't. That only happens in cartoons. (no pun intended) And yet, you're lead to believe this is what diabetics are like. It's just more lies about diabetics. It's just another lie of “unfit” that has not been proved but accepted by people, as the so called nice Politicians and senior Public Servants are saying so and the CDA is not challenging them.

It's another example of “unfit” comparisons, with the Gov't stating diabetics are a killing menace but when I ask Gov't to evaluate their own killing it's buried or covered up. With only a hint of harm their policy should have been evaluated, as they say diabetic drivers have been evaluated.

And the CDA is quiet about this. Whom threatened the CDA with what?

Fact 5, no one has proved the diabetic policy has changed anything concerning diabetic driving mishaps. Why? Because there is no beginning point for comparison; the unfit argument. Additionally, as with Dobbs husband's computer toy, the Intervention, the DME, has not been proved to be able to do what it's alleged to be able to do. And the CDA is quiet about this. The CDA is not quiet about medicine intervention and life styles, for benefit and harm, why not the policy?

Fact 6, how do these Politicians and senior Public Servants legally justify the harm they do, knowing its killing and maiming? I don't know if they've broke the law morally or ethically; is it enough for them to be fired? How do we justify killing other than War? How does the CDA explain their indifference to these lies when they've been accused of killing?

Fact 7, 90% of funding for the CDA comes from people like me, maybe you, and business, while the remaining comes from Governments. Society is not allowed to be the naïve bystander and pretend gov't would not continue the funding if the CDA stood up for the Rights of diabetics. These people are corrupt and would do such a petty thing.

By default, as the Ombudsperson, you know that if 10% of your funding is withdrawn your business will fail; a good return on investments is only 3 – 5 %; if they give more they'll be broke. The perfect example of this is the 20% of G Ps that have disappeared due to illegal gov't demands and look at the failure that has expressed itself due to that and how that impacts all other medical fields following a visit to a G P and Emerge etc, etc. The G P is like the root of the tree, which feeds the rest of the tree, the G P must be visited to glean information to be passed on to the specialist doctors. Society expects 4 300 G Ps to be available, and G P/Client ratios of procedure are based upon that, but due to gov't demands upon the G P, 20%, there's only approximately 3 440 and look what that's done to the UHCS. A 10% loss in funding for the CDA will ruin it. The CDA knows this. The CDA is not a naïve bystander with this funding threat.

Fact 8, I also informed the CDA that my BC HRT Discrimination complaint changed the DME fee payment schedule for not only type 2s, but for type 1s and All disabled drivers. They failed to acknowledge this change, which in turn sets the Government up as the good guy, whom diabetics should be beholden to, as it seems, at first blush, the gov't changed who pays for the DME for humanitarian reasons, which is not true. Taxes now pay for the DME. The change came from me and my questions about the legality of the policy and its horrific consequences and the government's Big Idea was to offer me change to the Policy and a Review hoping I would go away. I accepted the offer of change, but the government has not fulfilled the changes concerning the illegal policy. The policy is still illegal, which means Bond, Martin, and Howie are falsely using our taxes for their personal gain. The use of taxes to pay for a Policy marries the policy to the tax, which at first blush seems to legally bind the two, as should be, but it's just a ruse to marry to two together, as in a bona fide marriage. It's just another charade to deceive, mislead, misinform, and misrepresent about what Bond, Martin, Howie, and their supporters are really doing. Another mind game played to deceive and mislead. Again, why hasn't the Auditor General responded to my Inquiry about this misuse of taxes, about how an illegal Policy is implemented? Has the Auditor General's office been threatened as well? Why is the CDA so secretive about this change and where it came from?

Fact 9, another enticement for me to go away saw the government Reimburse my DME fees but no other diabetics or disabled were Reimbursed their fees and yet the DME fee change included them, a gov't initiated change; I didn't ask or demand this fee change or the Reimbursement. And the CDA again refused to acknowledge this and fight for Equality and Inclusion for diabetics for their fee Reimbursement. Why wouldn't they fight for other diabetics, as the precedent had been set with the gov't making the offer of Reimbursement? Additionally, the Government set another precedent when they not only changed the fee payment for me, but for all type 2s, all type 1s, and all disabled drivers; I didn't ask for any of this. This Right – Thinking of mine, the precedent and Equality for all diabetics and disabled, should have been carried forward to the Reimbursement of fees for All diabetic and disabled drivers. However, they again consciously used their Wrong – Thinking to mislead, misinform, and misrepresent what they were doing. Why have they lied about this? Why didn't the CDA champion this Reimbursement? Why wasn't this championed for the disabled, as the “Disabled” are listed as a Class of People that are marginalized, which the Reimbursement would have helped. Just a reminder, the BC HRT also buried this; the Representative complaint is online December 2008. Who threatened the BC HRT about this Complaint?

Carter, remember Scale, this Reimbursement may have cost Government $500 000 000 or more, from 1996 – 2006. This comes from 10 years x $50 000 000 a year for the DME for all disabled = $500 000 000. This timeline is from the last revision of the Motor Vehicle Act, where we know the OSMV was forcing this illegal policy upon the disabled and diabetics. This Grand debit would be investigated publicly, as it would have been half a billion dollars or more and for what?

Now we add the fees paid for by Government, since my HRT Discrimination Complaint of 2006 and the Representative complaint, 2006 – 2008, if it would have been heard, 2 yrs = $100 000 000. For a total of about $600 000 000 for the Reimbursement.

If we run this to today we have 4 years (since 2008) x $50 000 000 a year at a minimum = $200 000 000. Now we add them together for $500 000 000 + $100 000 000 + 200 000 000 = $800 000 000 spent to pay for an illegal policy that does nothing but harm and kill.

This debit would be investigated publicly, as it would have been close to a billion dollars and for what? Plus the demand upon the G Ps would come to light. This is what the Auditor General's Office cannot acknowledge. Imagine what Good this amount of money would do for the UHCS. Or take the money used to attack diabetic drivers or the other medical conditions and transfer that money to research and think of the positive jobs and Good that would bring to our “democratic society”. Little lone get rid of corrupt Senior Public Servants who would not need to be replaced.

*

Big Idea, again, let me set this up. To cover up the demand and fee costs upon the UHCS, the fee is now paid to G Ps by the UHCS or MSP, the MSP is then reimbursed by the Solicitor General's Office, after some shuffling around, so the debit is not seen as a demand and debit upon the UHCS and G Ps; as it's not a genuine or bona fide demand upon the UHCS, as it would not survive the severe criticism and evaluation for Value, Worth, and Good the Public's demands go through. And the Auditor General and the CDA are quiet about this.

Carter, how is one to deal with people that are brow beaten, people that believe “their Place” in society is a “Place” constructed by bias, hate, fear and loathing, disgust, contempt, discrimination, prejudice, and bigotry? I don't know. I do know you leave them alone, as I have done, as their cowardliness, fear, and denial may Shame them into attacking me, as the Government and Winnipeg Police have done. However, I believe I've been wrong with this approach to the Canadian Diabetes Association, as they too have turned me invisible and sold my name and disease for profit.

During January 2012, I began receiving Reader's Digest, RD. The CDA sold my name to Reader's Digest, as a promotion scheme for RD and funds for the CDA. The literature from the CDA stated if I did not want RD I could contact them and they would delete me from their data base. Hold it. Hold it. Why am I getting RD in the first place and why do I need to contact RD to delete me from their records?

I joined the CDA for information concerning diabetes and to support research, done under the legal promise from the CDA, through their Privacy Policy, where they guarantee that I, my name and disease, would not be sold or given out to anyone, for any use. They breached the established Trust.

I wrote the CDA department that sent me the RD stuff and complained that they had breached their Privacy Policy and the Trust that accompanies that legal promise. I also stated it's a form of Negative Billing, which is against the law. They said they would have RD delete me from their records, but that I would continue to get RD for three or four months. As of today, May 1, 2012, I'm still getting RD.

I wrote the President of the CDA, complained and told him I was not his to sell; I was not his nigger. I also sent him the papers enclosed to inform him what happens when a diabetic stands up for his Rights and confronts psychopaths, sociopaths, liar, thieves, traitors, and Homicide; things he and his Advocacy department should have been confronting not only for diabetics but for Canada and Humanity. He has yet to respond; to many liabilities I imagine.

He'll never respond, as he's wrong and he knows it, as he's a coward and corrupt. There's 3 000 000 diabetics in Canada and he sold us like were not Humans. He's part of the problem, as he sees me as something with no Rights, he proved that by selling me. How many Diabetics are Seniors and have been abused by this so – called legal, mass marketing scheme coming from a so – called trustworthy, bona fide, non – profit organization, the CDA, and a no – name Christian, for – profit, American Corporation, Readers Digest?

*

Carter, most diabetes expresses post fifty years of age. You're writing about Seniors. What happens to Seniors when in a few month time they receive a billing notice from Reader's Digest to renew their subscription, as that's how it will be phrased. This is done after they've received RD for many months? You know, as well as I do, when you cancel a subscription the Subscription Department continues sending renewal notices for months. The word “No” means nothing to these people. In a well thought out business plan of attack Reader's Digest bought stolen information to get my name and disease; they received stolen goods from the CDA, which means they're just as guilty of theft, breach of Trust, and more.

The CDA sold private information for payment, stolen facts were received and used by RD for profit. It's not acceptable to pretend the CDA and RD did not work through scenarios such as this. They considered the Risks and Liabilities. They considered the Psychological game afoot concerning manipulating Seniors, as they are not naïve bystanders; no different than Dobbs and her husband, Bond, Martin, and Howie playing Psychological games upon Seniors. My point is, some Seniors do forget yearly events, do forget such trivial things as renewal and just renew a subscription through Trust. The CDA and Reader's Digest Human Resource Departments know the problems seniors experience concerning things such as this, and they will work seniors knowing these facts. An interesting Connection, what if they bought research off Dobbs, as this is what she researches; trust, its breach, and the impacts and consequences of stress upon Seniors. If they did use Dobbs' research, did they pay for stolen material?

It's more than really nasty what the CDA has done to its members and its seniors; this is Senior Abuse. As the CDA does not support Canada, its Constitution, and Human Rights, exemplified by not supporting my Discrimination Complaints and fighting for Rights, they have again proved their lack of respect for our Constitution and Human Rights by not living up to their own Privacy Policy, by selling its members, as if they were an animal to be used for whatever, like something non – Human to be used for whatever gain. As there are Blood Diamonds, this is Blood Money.

With this in mind do you really believe this corrupt Group – Thinking from Government and private organizations and Wrong – Thinking will address the problems in the UHCS you've exposed? You're Report declared you and your colleagues as just another enemy to them. Well done. An Amendment would further expose their incompetences.

*



Big Ideas and Scale for Context, therefore Connections to “Human Experiments”

Carter, let me set this up again. What I've found myself within is more than Gangster corruption. You're the Lawyer and a Judge, a really different kind of Judge to do what you've done. You know what legal terms are used to define these people and what they're doing. They are liars, thieves, thugs, bullies, brutes, traitors, and murders. In other words, at a minimum, they have broken their Oaths of Office, just for lying and falsifying documents, little lone criminal and civil law, which I know nothing about, but I do know that if I did this kind of thing the gov't would attack me and I haven't been; at least not through the courts. If you did this in your cases you would be challenged and attacked. So, why haven't these people been attacked by Gov't and the RCMP? Why wasn't Martin fired for his attack, assault, and denigration of my character and falsifying legal documents to do so?

They are Traitors, as they consciously broke a Crown Settlement Agreement and played a charade to cover it up. They run policy against the demands and objectives of the Crown knowing the policy harms and kills, knowing their behaviour harms People and our “democratic society”.

They are Murders. They know the consequences of their behaviour is responsible for the Overcrowding in Emerge and long wait – times for surgery, as “their Medical Doctor, Dr. P Ballem, Deputy Minister, July 11, 2003” acknowledged the lack of Science to justify the policy and the harm; this acknowledgment of the illegality and harm of the policy and that there was no Science to justify the policy little lone the consequences saw Ballem leave the Min of Health soon after that letter. Knowing all this and not changing their behaviour is Homicide of some Degree or Class. It's more than death through indifference to Human Life, death through reckless endangerment to Human Life, or death through negligence. These people know they're doing it and have not stopped. But they did get rid of the G P that wrote the incriminating letter exposing their illegal and murderous behaviour.

They're liars and criminals as they have falsified legal documents to protect themselves. They have stolen research and falsified an Affidavit. They have broken the Trust of Government, the Affidavit, their Oath of Office, and the Trust of the Social Contract, we Humans live by. Martin and his colleagues falsified documents in order to contrive the “The Notice of Prohibition”, as a legal Crown document. Martin did falsify legal documents in order to harm me. He used his official position to deceive that he was actually doing official gov't business. He's still employed by gov't, as is Howie, Dobbs, and the new Solicitor General Bond. Bond knows the policy is illegal etc etc. How do we define this Big Idea of corruption, as they all defend themselves like Gang members do. Gangsters care nothing for laws of a “democratic society” or laws of Humanity. But it's bigger than just the idea of drug dealing gangsters.

There is Scale that needs to be again acknowledged to understand how we got to where we are today; diabetes is now 10% of society and most of us drive, that's 400 000 diabetics and now add a few million or more for all the other medical conditions that Martin and Howie state they monitor for the Good of society and yet they never acknowledge that anyone they monitor visits their doctor for care. These millions of people have had their Rights forfeited by these Gangsters for the Politicians and senior Public Servants ' “view” of life, where they're already running an unsanctioned Human Experiment upon the diabetic and disabled driver. This twisted power has now lead these gangsters to another branch in their road of corruption. They will now attack a very select, vulnerable Class of People to see what they can get away with; they'll play out a new Examination with a Human Experiment to see where the limits are. These lies and bigotry will express again in how they treat Seniors, as we already see Bond “just” saying it's ok to do. She offered no Science of proof that she had fulfilled the demands of the Charter, HR Code, the MVA and laws of Humanity. This Policy is not justified and its another illegal Human Experiment which is another Crime Against Humanity.

I've continued my Inquiry to allow these monsters to really define themselves over time, which they have. Their deviant behaviour has escalated to not only include an attack and assault upon me personally, but a Psychological and Sexual attack as well, and now they've institutionalized another illegal Human Experiment upon Seniors, a Social – Psychological Human Experiment not Sanctioned by any bona fide Governing Body or managed by a Code of Ethics. Their Gangster behaviour has now lead them to Human Experiments where their behaviour kills and maims, where they refuse to Stop knowing all this. Their Gangster behavior is not some street killing but Government instigated killing of large numbers of the Public; it is Democide. They've proved they will not stop with the diabetic policy, knowing the harm, which means we know they will not stop when Seniors begin to die.



Once again, the Big Idea of Science. The General Practitioner that wrote the letter admitting to this lack of Science to justify the policy and acknowledged the harm, who gave up her practice to work with the Ministry of Health, to make the world a better place, soon disappeared after that letter, which I began to refer to as evidence as how Discriminatory the policy is. Was she fired, harassed out of the position of senior Public Servant, or quit realizing what I was Inquiring about was worse than I understood and wrote about? I saw her on TV during the 2010 Olympics, a senior administrator for the Mayor of Vancouver. She stood up for Science, the Truth, and Canada. Will this happen to you Carter, if you write an Amendment? Just thinking of such retribution from those corrupt Politicians and senior Public Servants should have you writing an Amendment to prove Canada is bigger than them and their twisted and perverted “view” of Democracy and Life.

*

A “Human Experiment” but Presented as a Diabetic Driver's “Policy”

Again, I've been Classified, Labeled, Given a Number, forced to undergo a Phoney medical examination, will be Tracked for the rest of my life, and turned into a Social Pariah all because I have type 2 diabetes. And this is in addition to my regular licensing protocol that drivers undergo that is a bona fide demand with Good. What's the Big Idea behind this kind of illegal Registration? How do we really define this illegal, arbitrarily imposed, denigrating, bigoted, Social Policy? These people are not Democrats like millions of Canadians and myself. They care nothing for Democracy and the needed work to keep it. As they deceive about their “view” of Democracy they deceive about the Policy and what it really is.



The Five Steps of Engagement; Carter, you do these steps, as you're successful but may use different names or order. You'll read about this in the other letters; working Standards that need to be acknowledged and worked through to be successful. However, with this Government Policy, only the steps have been acknowledged, the work is backwards and conclusions prescribed, they've corrupted these Standards; corrupted with purpose to deceive; more “flimflam”. They present as if they're not only following the Five Steps of Engagement, but presenting through Scientific Standards of an bona fide sanctioned Experiment, but it's only another charade. They've corrupted World Scientific Standards, just as Bond, Martin, and Howie, did when they hired Dobbs to corrupt their official Scientific presentation in my BC HRT Discrimination Complaint to mislead, misinform, and misrepresent as to what they were really doing. They presented Science but it was stolen and used for things it was not done for. It exemplifies how wrong their Group – Think and Wrong – Thinking is, as they falsely declare they have worked through the Steps, therefore justifying their Policy and its Consequences. The Policy is more than just something being worked through for success, as seen with the Steps of Engagement applied to a Business Plan or Life.

They base the Policy upon unproven Consequences of the Question at hand, “Are type 2 diabetic drivers having more driver mishaps than non – diabetic drivers”, where they should be collecting data on driver mishaps, as ICBC collects such data; their data is not even mentioned. They falsely pronounce the diabetic driver as guilty already; the “unfitness” Mind Game, and then they use a real G P, a Medical Doctor, to implement an Experiment, the DME, who's supposedly collecting bona fide research data to understand their question, but the data collection Examination and Form is not about bona fide or actual driver mishaps. They weigh me, measure my height, check my vision but for what? These measurements do not cause hypoglycemia or driver mishaps related to diabetes and besides my G P does all this. It's part of the misrepresentation concerning the Policy, to make it seem as if these measurements make the DME part of a bona fide Human Experiment. The G Ps staff wear white coats as if Doctors or Scientists, but really they're just clerical workers. More flimflam. What has this to do with the driving mishap records of ICBC? What has this to do with hypoglycemia, low blood sugar, the unproven influence that supposedly causes the difference in diabetic driver mishaps, which Bond, Martin, Howie and their colleagues base the policy upon; plus their un – Democratic “view” of life? Why don't they use the actual driver mishap rate? That's why this is a phoney Human Experiment, as one is lead to believe the Scientific Method is being played out. It's an Experiment alright, with real Intervention based upon lies and real Consequences of the Intervention, but something done to mislead, to keep an illegal Social Policy in Place.

What the DME Form asks of the diabetic is; 'if the diabetic has ever experienced “hypoglycemia” or “severe hypoglycemia”within the timeline of the past DME.' Are you kidding me. That was five years ago and what relevance does it have today? What does it matter if I was low blood sugar yesterday? I'm not asked if I drove while experiencing low blood sugar. Why not? Because that would again prove diabetic drivers care for themselves, therefore the Public.

Why aren't I asked about how many hours I'm driving and what time, which can then be compared to the low blood sugar time? If I was low blood sugar while sleeping so what? If walking so what? While running or weight lifting, etc etc. So what? None of this is asked. That's why their Experiment is phoney, done to deceive but it's really a failed Human Experiment due to the Harm and illegality.

The truth about hypoglycemia is that “Straight People” also experience hypoglycemia and severe hypoglycemia, as what do you think Road Rage is based upon? After your friends have something to eat their Road Rage disappears, just like in the recent TV commercials from Snickers chocolate bars. My point is, Bond, Martin, Howie and their anti – diabetic lobbyists do not acknowledge hypoglycemia in Straights. How can they run an Experiment and not involve both parties involved; the diabetic and non – diabetic or straight? That's why this is a phoney Human Experiment as they use no Standards even knowing the Harm.

They then draw and implement Policy from this phoney Experiment. However, every Experiment that discovers facts and presents a bona fide Conclusion and offers some kind of Intervention must also study the Intervention for its Consequences. Interesting enough Bond, Martin, Howie, the Ministry of Health know of the Harm from the Intervention and lack of Good and yet continue with their phoney Human Experiment.

This really is a Human Experiment and the Experimentors know it harms, therefore it's a Crime Against Humanity.

Carter, the above really is how these Monsters are running this Policy and they will use the “unfitness” accusation against the Senior and set up a phoney Experiment to run on them. Dobbs and her husband are running it now because Canadians would not stand up to them and they are afraid of monsters.

*

The Scientific Method was designed so that there are Standards, so that Science could be repeated by other people, preferably bona fide Scientists from all over the world. My idea of the Five Steps of Engagement is no different than this time tested process of engagement. Bond, Martin, and Howie's process is a negative or mirror image of what should be done. They play an Experiment, touch on the Scientific Method, but only feign bona fide (ness).

First Step, the Policy has not been proved to be “Needed”; second, the “Intervention” is not able to do what its alleged to be able to do; third, the “Consequences” are not acknowledged publicly; fourth, there is no proven “Good”; and lastly there is No “Acknowledgment” of what the client, or the Human subject, is doing in the first instance, in relation to the Need.

Again, in order to drive I'm forced to comply with the DME and am Classified etc, etc, both false pronouncements of doing Good in order to protect the Public from the government's contrived 'diabetic as the Social Pariah'. This is in addition to my regular licensing that I approve of and is a bona fide demand. This contrivance is in opposition to Law and Science, as I have not been found guilty of anything and Science does not begin with the premise I'm guilty and the experiment will prove an already formed Conclusion and Intervention. What they have planned and implemented is a phoney Experiment to prove their false accusation at any cost; the unproven “unfitness” with a phoney Intervention with the lie it does Good.

Science defines a question, gathers information and resources, forms an explanatory hypothesis, test the hypothesis by collecting data, analyze the data, interpret the data and draw conclusions, publish results, and retest by others, (hopefully by peers). (wikipedia, Elements of scientific method) It does begin with a unproven statement, and then through a charade concerning collecting data, steal science not done for what's it being used for, conclusions are arbitrary, results have not been published as the Government and its so called Scientists would be Black listed from the Science Community. One does not steal science to prove a Policy already in play, trying to justify the Conclusion and an Intervention.

The demand upon me, a diabetic driver, Needs to be realized as an unsanctioned Human Experiment gone amuck, as that's what it really is. This diabetic policy is no different than Martin and Howie's new Human Experiment being run by Dobbs and her husband, which also has a phoney or corrupt “Purpose”, or thesis, or proposition statement, as it's not been Proved as Needed; where's the fulfillment of the Scientific Method to fulfill the demands of the Charter, HR Code, and MV? Where in Fact ICBC's driving mishap records prove there is no need for a Special Policy for Seniors. The “Procedure”, the Five Steps of Engagement, or Scientific Method, has not been followed, there are no controls of a Code of Ethics, and it has not been Sanctioned by a Governing body. The collection of “Data” has not been made public by Bond, Martin, and Howie. Their statements of “unfitness” mean nothing, as they've not proved “unfitness”. With a “Conclusion” being a lie to say the least, that Seniors are unfit and their Conclusion is bona fide and they just happen to have an Intervention that will resolve the “unfitness”. The Government's lie that their “Intervention”, the DME, offers Good must also be exposed. Again, there needs to be a Sanctioned Human Experiment by Dobbs' husband to prove his computer toy can do what its alleged to be able to do and that it does not harm, little lone kill. They offer nothing except lies from Bond. One is not allowed to kill and maim due to a contrived supposition concerning someone you do not like.

Lastly, the “Recommendation” by Bond to continue with the Senior's Driver's Policy due to changes in driver “Behaviour” due to their computer toy Intervention, is also a lie, as nothing has been discovered about the Intervention that has made changes to “Behaviour”, concerning the accusations of Seniors being a hazard to society.

*

The claim the DME and Policy changes “Behaviour” defines the Policy and its methods as an Experiment, a Human Experiment that needs to be Sanctioned by a Governing Body and a Code of Ethics, which means this Human Experiment is against the Law and is a Crime Against Humanity due to its illegality and horrific consequences. This format for the Government is now played out against the Senior, as its been successful manipulating the Public about the diabetic and disabled.

This Senior policy is also based upon bias, fear and loathing, disgust, contempt,hate, discrimination, prejudice, and bigotry and really is a Grand Social Policy, a Human Experiment gone amuck. The steps mentioned above are no different than what is worked through for an Experiment, a Business Plan, or a Plan for Life. This corrupt format by Bond, Martin, and Howie against the diabetic has not been stopped as Canada is afraid of them for some reason. With this knowledge they're now attacking Seniors with the same corrupt process, as it's been proved to be successful in fulfilling their bias, hate, prejudice and bigotry. Successful in fulfilling their Lust and Greed for Status, Prestige, Power, and Wealth.

*

The new Policy concerning Seniors really is a Human Social – Psychological Experiment because they're trying to Prove a change in Behaviour with the Policy and yet they haven't proved there's something to change or even that their “computer toy” can do anything; how mad are they? So how have they been doing this, how are they to apply their attack to Seniors?

The Big Idea and Scale is that they use doctors for the medical “Examination”, to collect Data, to somehow prove change, therefore Good, as Medical Doctors are Scientists, and we know Doctors and Scientists are bound by a World Wide Code of Ethics, Experiment or not, so “Doctors” are used to play their charade to feign bona fide (ness) of Data Collection and “Legitimacy”, through their Code of Ethics, to justify the illegal policy. (Use something Good and Legitimate on one hand, done to distract, to transfer the Good and Legitimacy to the other hand that implies your “Behaviour” seems bona fide.) But their Doctors are not Medical Doctors are they. No, Dobbs is an “academic researcher” called “Dr.” by government and it is not clear what her husband is other than he's invented some kind of computer toy that has not been “Peer Reviewed” for bona fide (ness) as to what it is and can actually do. There are also World Wide restrictions on Human Experiments with Codes of Ethics for Controls and Limits to keep the Fascists, Nazis, and Monsters under control.

For the diabetic Experiment I was not informed that it was an Experiment, only that it was bona fide Policy.

Rules:

I was not Informed that I would be part of a Human Experiment. I was lied to that the Policy was bona fide, therefore what I was involved in was not an bona fide Experiment, certainly not a sanctioned Human Experiment.

I was not Informed that I would be part of a Human Experiment that was known to Not be Scientifically needed.

I was not Informed that I would be part of a Human Experiment that was known to Harm.

I was not Informed that I would be part of a Human Experiment that was known to Not be able to do what it was alleged to be able to do.

I was not Informed that I would be part of a Human Experiment that was known to Not be Sanctioned by an Accredited management board, such as the National Research Council of Canada, and bound by a Code of Ethics for Control and Limits.



These people have not only broken Canada's Laws but World Humanitarian Law.

I did not give my Permission to be part of a Human Experiment.

I did not give my Permission to be part of a Human Experiment, as the Government, especially Martin and Howie, had not proved there is a bona fide Need for a Human Experiment and only based it upon their “view” of life.

I did not give my Permission to be part of a Human Experiment, as Martin and Howie did not prove the Driver's Medical Examination could do what they allege it can do; that's to manage “hypoglycemia”, low blood sugar, the very reason for the Policy. And yet, they have not even proven hypoglycemia to be the agent of diabetic driver mishaps; that the Policy and DME decreases the unproven difference in driver mishaps between diabetic drivers and non – diabetic drivers, which Martin and Howie state why the Policy is needed. This Wrong – Thinking concerning Standards of Science and the World is an example of their Hate, Bias, Prejudice, Discrimination, and Bigotry. They have now transferred this phoney process of bona fide (ness) to Seniors.

Seniors know there is something wrong but I don't believe they understand the corruption they have just become involved in, as its only supposed to happen in Fascist or Nazi states or Socialist or Communist states, not “democratic societies” such as Canada.

*



Hunting

Carter, if this was a bona fide, Scientific, well thought out Sanctioned Experiment, and Managed by a Code of Ethics for Control and Limits, the Policy would have been stopped with the first knowledge of Harm years ago and it wasn't. Not only actual harm but even the slightest whiff of harm is enough to stop Human Experiments. Bond, Martin, Howie, and their colleagues deceive that this Diabetic Policy is just a Policy, where in fact its an illegal Human Experiment.

They're playing a terrible game of hunting those they dislike. It is a Hunt, covered up by the camouflage of Policy and an Experiment, that is supposed to change Behaviour for the Good of Society. Those running this Experiment did not stop with the harm and who knows why they haven't, other than they're Psychopaths, Sociopaths, and Worse, and enjoy the Criminality and Killing. They're addicted to the Human Hunt. I don't think they can stop, as they haven't and they have not quit their jobs in support of my exposure of their Policy, as they've now escalated their attacks to the Personal level.

Carter, who's easier to catch, the diabetic or disabled, which will by default includes Seniors, or Seniors, who are defined by age but include the diabetic and disabled? Either way they Hunt the vulnerable, don't they. That's what the Nazis did, didn't they; they hunted and Experimented on the Disabled. That's what those nasties in old Yugoslavia did, didn't they; hunted the vulnerable people of difference.

Carter, you don't think Dobbs will be or is recording this Experiment to include it in her Resume?

The Big Idea really is Democide, as those that are hunted, the diabetic, are not killed, the naïve bystander is killed, as a consequence of the Hunt. They've now escalated the Hunt to include a very select Class of Society; Seniors.

*

With the implementation of the illegal Social – Psychological Human Experiment concerning Senior drivers what we're now seeing is these same people targeting Seniors, they're hunting Seniors as they hunt diabetics, as Seniors have now been Classified as “unfit”. They're now Classified, Labeled, Given a Number, forced to under go a Phoney Mind Experiment, will be Tracked for the rest of their life, and turned into a Social Pariah all because they are old and driving; and this new Exam is in addition to having exams because they are old, may have diabetes or some other medical disability that they may be already illegally examined for by the OSMV, and that they're managing through G P care. Don't Seniors visit their G P for the medical needs as I do? Has this been acknowledged by Bond, Martin, and Howie?

With the first death of a Senior, coming from this new illegal Social – Psychological Policy against Seniors, the first death needs to be Classified as Genocide, as a very Specific Class of People, Senior drivers, have been Singled out by some Politicians and senior Public Servants for no bona fide reason, other than their perverted “view” of life and their need to Experiment upon Seniors, a vulnerable Class of People within our “democratic society”.

The Big Idea really is Genocide, as those that are Hunted are killed.

*



Capital Punishment

A Canadian Big Idea. Canada does not have Capital Punishment anymore, we, as accountable men and women, as a Country, decided just one death by government is wrong, even if the Human is found guilty of a crime that would have resulted in capital punishment a few years ago.

We decided that we could not kill one Human by government and take the risk that he or she was not guilty. We also decided we could not play God, decide who lives and who dies. (We acknowledge God in our Charter of Rights and Freedoms, with the statement “supremacy of God”.)

So, why is the Government allowed to kill in Emerge and through long wait – times for surgery? They know they're killing. They've placed themselves beside God, or replaced the “supremacy of God” and play God themselves. They accept the killing, as if the naïve bystander in Emerge is acceptable collateral damage to their “view” of life. Carter, you're a lawyer and judge, what kind of Big Idea is this? If one becomes this twisted, would they give up playing God? Do you really think they'll stop?

Now add Scale, what's happening in other provinces, such as in Manitoba and the Sinclair killing, where the Politicians and senior Public Servants are covering it up by inventing a Scapegoat to metaphorically kill, as if that's ok. The nurse living under the threat of a charge of Homicide will see her Nurse's life killed off, she may be killed in jail.

Covering up the government's involvement in Sinclair's death, by having another Province evaluate their Investigation, makes it seem the Government is hands off any incriminating attachment to the killing in Emerge, which is just another charade played out to hide what they're really doing. But when the charade is deconstructed it's still Government killing people, it's Democide, as Sinclair was the naïve bystander, but the Government wasn't. Now a nurse is to become another naïve bystander, but a selected one, for Sacrifice, to make the troubled Society, an unfit society, better from its ills. And yet its the Politicians and senior Public Servants that are the degenerates, those that are unfit.

Carter, the Manitoba Politicians and senior Public Servants sent their problem to Saskatchewan to hide their involvement in a new form of Capital Punishment; government sanctioned, illegal, public policy that kills naïve bystanders and they know it. How do we define that Big Idea of government killing? That's why the Chief of Police in Winnipeg and his colleagues in Manitoba and elsewhere are working so hard to cover it up. Their attack upon me was not a small matter.

*



Science

Science, a Big Idea. The Science I read concerning type 2 diabetes did not support the policy and if it did I would not be here, as I would need to believe what was discovered, as it would have been through the Scientific Method and Peer Reviewed. This would have seen the Solicitor General and Howie prove the Policy in 2002 and she didn't offer anything.

Again, Martin, Howie, and their colleagues cannot accept that I voluntarily visit the G P for diabetes care at a rate of twenty (20) times to the one (1) forced visit for them. Why? If the policy is for the betterment of Society why can't they acknowledged the care my G P and myself practice for Personal Care, therefore Societal Care. My G P and myself work through a proved bona fide Intervention coming from a bona fide Conclusion of studies on diabetic care and medical interventions, which lead to a Recommendation of Intervention. My Intervention is legal, bona fide medical care, paid for by the UHCS, based upon the Scientific Method and an Intervention that has also been through the Scientific Method, diabetic medicines, where data is collected and reviewed by my G P for a further intervention with more or changes to medication or not, with proven Good. Why is this not acknowledged? Hate, absolute Hate.

Additionally, Howie could not prove her Intervention could do what it's alleged to be able to do. She acknowledged that perversion of Science but said it was ok to do in her “view” of life. Why continue? Why continue knowing the harm and that diabetics do care for themselves, which in turn means they care for the Good of Society? Which is opposite to the Experimental Policy being run by Bond, Martin, and Howie.

They carry on even though there is no Science to defend the need for a Policy? What kind of Science do they think would need to be invented to justify the killing and maiming, as a result of an illegal Human Experiment?

This is another example of the “unfitness” Circle Game, or Mind Game, which is not Science, but school ground semantics or in the grown – up world, Bullshit. They say I'm unfit, and need to change my Behavior to be fit, and their illegal DME does this. But I already practice Personal Care with the G P, which means I already practice Public Care, which means how do I fulfill their demands to correct my “unfitness”, as I already do more than they say they do? I'm already under the assurance and expertise of a G P, a real Medical Doctor, a real Scientist, practicing real Science? These people have corrupted Science for what purposes? Their own Gain, by any means, and Hate and Bigotry.

*



“Time” gives Connections and Context

Carter, as I had been turned into a non – person, with no Rights and Freedoms, I knew I needed to challenge these people. However, the only recourse I have is to ask questions, as I do not have millions of dollars to challenge them through our courts for my Rights, where they use my taxes to fight me, as the BC Rail trials exemplify.

However, I did approach these people through the BC Human Rights Tribunal only to be waylaid by my Honesty and Good Will; values demanded through actions within the BC HRT and Life. But until one really practices Approachability, Accommodation, and Compromise during an argument one does not understand the true worth, value, and credibility of the opposition. I needed a formal setting in order to have these people declare themselves and they did through three BC HRT Discrimination Complaints, where the HRT became corrupted and letters of Response to my Inquiry. Through these instruments they exemplified how deep their corruption, anti – social, twisted, perverted Group – Think, and Wrong – Thinking was and is. Time has shown us the lack of a bona fide Policy is fact and the depths they will go to protect themselves; stealing Science is only one instance. The flimflam associated with my Reviews or Amendments to the Draft, Policy, and Draft is fact. The threats to ICBC fact. The threats from Manitoba fact. The attack and assault by Martin fact. Time allows such corrupt infections to fester and grow until they become more pronounced, and as they are unchecked, the ooze spreads to other parts of the Public Body, Seniors. And all this time they have not found any Science to justify their policy and killing.

The Science I read to support my Inquiry and Discrimination Complaints came from the most respected and prolific diabetic researchers in the world. They had a Big Idea. Their approach was a Seminal idea, which changed our ideas of diabetes and evaluation of driver mishaps; their research over time lead to a new understanding of how to define a bona fide question concerning diabetes and driving and how to gather information. Their discoveries were so important in 2002 they not only published the Abstract online, but published the whole experiment online for the World to read, for all Scientists and the Public to read. This was also a Seminal idea to do at that time, as the costs were restrictive, not like today. Also, one did not need to join a Scientific Journal to have access to this bona fide, Peer Reviewed Experiment, that debunked the bias, misinformation, lies, hate, discrimination, prejudice, bigotry, and Fear concerning type 2 diabetes and driver mishaps. No one in the world has challenged this Peer Reviewed Experiment, no one, not even the anti – diabetic lobby, because their bias, prejudice, bigotry and Wrong – Thinking would be exposed. The Scale of this experiment included three or four States in the USA and three or four Countries in Europe. There were other bona fide, peer reviewed Experiments that I also used to expose the Wrong – Thinking of Martin and Howie and their colleagues. There is no bona fide reason for this policy, that's why the Gangster Games to hide the illegality and its consequences, the falsification of documents, and the escalation of attacks upon me, as Science does not justify the Policy; its only Mad Men and Women doing this. And now they need to hide their killing as it's been exposed in Manitoba. Time has exposed them for what they are. Time has also exposed their Corruption of Science; the theft of Science and the phoney Experiments of Intervention, which really are unsanctioned, illegal, unethical and immoral Human Experiments that have been proven to harm.

The corruption of Science is a Big Idea and now they've Experimented with their hands – on practice of denigrating Science they will continue their perverted actions to attack another vulnerable Class of People in Canada, Seniors. As their Rights have also been taken away by Bond, Martin, and Howie, which means they're non – Persons, and the Experiment will proceed under the false claims of bona fide (ness) and sanctioned Science. Time will tell us how many they kill with their illegal policy based upon their “view” of life, unproven “unfitness”, not Science.

*



Gangsters defined

As I do not have these Politicians and senior Public Servants on a pedestal and really believe they need to follow the demands of the Charter, the HR Code, the MVA, and their Oaths of Office, as I do, as most Canadians do, and as they consciously chose not to follow our laws and laws of Humanity, I needed to ask; “What kind people are these people?”.

What kind of Big Idea are they, as they are not doing this by themselves? This is not something arbitrarily happening in our “democratic society”. It's contrived and played out by numerous players, with checks and balances, with protection, and reviews in anticipation of moving forward with their anti – social, anti – democratic “view” of life.

They really are monsters and monsters need to be poked in the eye, they need to be challenged, and they need defining or they seem aloof, untouchable, and beyond reproach. These people fulfill all the requirements to be Classified as a Gang, from Mike Knox's “Gangsta in the House”. As I'm Classified, Labeled, etc, etc, and turned into a Social Pariah by these people I needed to step up and define them, as to what they really are, because they are not law abiding citizens, or law abiding Politicians and Public Servants, or Humanitarians, and they've replaced the “supremacy of God” with themselves. As we needed to define their Experimental Process for clarity, we need to define and label these people.



Carter, I “Classified” them as a Gang; with the “Label” of “Matriarchal Mommas Gang”, and listed a number of Gang Members; exposed their behaviour by Examination, acquired Data and recorded it, exposing the “Consequences” of their actions; sent this letter to the world and placed it online so they'll be “Tracked” for the Remaining Days of their lives; and as we need to know what is being done at the “Beginning” to see if interventions is needed, I exposed them as the real Social Pariah, as at the “Beginning”, they had no bona fide reason to do what they were doing; and lastly have made bona fide “Recommendations” to cancel the Policy and charge these Gang members with breach of Oath of Office and Trust, Homicide, Treason, Crimes Against Humanity, and Democide.

It should be noted that at that time in my inquiry most of those involved were women, therefore the term Matriarchal. After the recent interaction with Martin he may have contrived this to be at arms length for protection, as he was the Superintendent, or maybe the Matriarchal Mommas may have played him, as he's so dysfunctional and full of hate.

What do Gang members do? They knowing break the Law, kill and maime, lie, falsify documents, mislead, misinform, misrepresent, give each other jobs, support each other, defend each other, threaten people, care nothing for Life, and participate in acts of Initiation into the Gang. Dobbs' Initiation was to steal Science and other protected writings, breach the Trust of Affidavit, send stolen material threw the mail, which is mail fraud, where she was then protected when caught. Now as a fully fledged Gang member she has a new position relating to Seniors and has got her husband a job where he's doing the same; corrupting Science and running an unsanctioned Human Experiment. These Gang Members have no Reverence for Life or they would have stopped what they are doing.

As the Social Pariah I continue to write and confront those that have contrived and constructed this social disgrace, where they continue with their bias, hate, fear and loathing, disgust, contempt, prejudice, discrimination, and bigotry. But things have changed, as no one has challenged them, other than me, 'they have learned' that they can do what they want, their covert 'learned behaviour' is now overtly displayed, as exemplified with Martin's attack upon me, the defense of his actions, and the attack upon Seniors.

However, with Martin's personal attack, assault, and denigration of my character and the falsifying of documents to do so , this overt attack seemed to have scared them, as Martin must have wondered off their plan, as they told me my license would be returned to me, where I then discovered Martin had permanently cancelled my license and I would need to apply for and pay for a new license, and would not need to be interrogated by the Review Board. This only happened after I sent my April 20, 2011 letter to the world, complaining about Martin's lies and attack; done just in case he killed me.

Their letter of apology addressing change of diabetic type Classification was like reading a letter from a Ministry of Propaganda, and I informed the writer and Solicitor General of such. The letter did not mention Martin's Policy is illegal, his lies to restrict my license, his lies to falsely cancel my license with the statement I was found unfit, that the “Notice of Prohibition” had been falsified by Martin to enable license restrictions and cancellations. The letter of apology was just a lie and charade to cover up what had been done by one of the gang members. The author of the letter was a new player in all this, I imagine they were recruiting a new member and he needed to go through his act of Initiation; to lie, mislead, misinform, and misrepresent about what Martin had done and what the Gang were really doing. So, they now have a new male member, which may force a change to the Gang name. Of course, being a Gang, I may need to ask the Mommas first.

The Big Idea is that they will do this to Seniors, as Gangs do attack the vulnerable and defenseless. They're like mad dogs on the hunt of something wounded. Who do they go after next?

*

What this cover up of what Martin did informs me that they will attack me, but through different roads, where no roads return to them, as Martin's hate did. Martin really overstepped their plans. He went wild in the Public Space, exposed them, and demonstrated how they manipulate ICBC with threats, as ICBC would not return my license after I had competed all that they demanded of me, who cancelled my license after I challenged Martin for restricting my license, who now know the diabetic Policy is illegal, that the “Notice of Prohibition” is illegal, and have refused to respond to my questions about this, and carry on as if nothing has happened. Did Martin also threaten ICBC?

They'll kill me in the non – Public Space. Just road kill, while I'm walking one day.

Bear with me again, Martin stated he had spies or informers reporting on me, thus his statement about me driving under while being restricted by ICBC, as I wouldn't undergo his demand that I undergo another Driver's Medical Examination, where I really should have been given a Temporary license, while ICBC investigated my claim the Policy was illegal. Then Martin had ICBC cancel my license, which would mean I would need a new photo and pay for the process, not that my license would be returned to me as stated with the restriction if I fulfilled the DME. There's a difference here in cancellations. My point is, “What did Martin and his Gang threaten ICBC with in order for all this to happen to me?”

Carter, as no one has challenged these people for what they are doing and they've now escalated their deviant behaviour, overtly this time, where they are using the same corrupt “academic researcher”, Dobbs, to now attack a new vulnerable Class of People, Seniors. Without confrontation for a bona fide explanation, they believe they can do anything.

They're already running illegal policy against the Demands and Objectives of the Crown and it seems everyone is afraid of them, as this is not supposed to happen in the ideal “democratic society”, a nice Place, such as Canada.

Big Idea. They're trying to contrive the “democratic society” they want, not the “democratic society” Canada is.



The Big Idea really is Treason, and if a few crass plebeians die in Emerge, or die or are maimed waiting for surgery, or the disabled, seniors, and the pariahs of society die, as naïve bystanders, its just 'acceptable peripheral damage' to these people. The above is what will happen to Seniors if they confront Martin. Martin has deep psychological mental health problems and needs to be exposed, as does his Deputy, Howie, and Solicitor Bond for allowing and participating in this.

*

Again, do I really worry for my life? Yes, I do. I love Life. The people involved in this see me as no more than one of the thousands of Emerge deaths or those killed and maimed waiting for surgery. They see me as just one more death, an unfortunate consequence resulting from their desire for their “democratic society”, and that's all I would be. Just road kill, nothing more; something killed at arms length like all their other killings. If you or I were anymore than accepted kill these people would have stopped their illegal behaviour and they haven't, they've escalated it over the past few years. We now have the personal physical and psychological attack upon me and even though I fought back they have chosen not to cancel the policy. This means that as I won't go away they've only one last action to remedy the problem of me, kill me. Especially now I've complained about the illegal Senior's policy and its consequences, Genocide, and this letter to you. Gangsters do not like being challenged little lone exposed.

Carter, they have a taste for this Criminality and Killing and won't stop and from your work with monsters you know this, as they pretend they're sitting beside God, and play out who lives and who doesn't. They've put themselves above or beside the “supremacy of God” in order to 'rationalize' their behaviour and the consequences.

The “supremacy of God”, that's a Big Idea to have written into our Constitution, our Charter of Rights and Freedoms, isn't it. It's a wonderful Big Idea and Scale for us to acknowledge and try to live our lives by.

Why should they stop playing God, as only I have the grit to question their behaviour? And who am I? A diabetic with no Rights, something non – Human. Do you really think they'll give up playing God? In their minds, Seniors are close to death anyway and if they die through the stress of the mind games and psychological examination this only proves their frailties and this frailty proves they shouldn't be driving anyway. They'll rationalize their killing and criminality at all times and if this doesn't work they launch personal attacks and threats and then move to personal killing, as that's what Gangsters do.

*

Again, the people I've been introduced to over the years from this Inquiry, do not Love Life. If they did they would not do what they are doing. They would do the opposite and do everything in their power to protect life, not falsify and steal documents to justify their “view” of life. They have the easiest job in Canada, fulfill the demands of the laws I mention and no one can harm them for doing so. This was not done.

Secondly, at the beginning of this policy they should of demanded of those making demands of them to fulfill the demands of the Charter, the HR Code, and the MVA, to prove a bona fide Need and if they couldn't then there would be no Policy with an illegal Intervention into Canadians lives. This was not done. They chose not to protect Canadians.

Third, all Interventions have consequences and these people refused to acknowledge the consequences of the Policy upon not only the diabetic, the disabled, the Public, UHCS, and G Ps, but the ambiance of our “democratic society”.

At a minimum they've turned their backs on the demands of the laws of Canada and at a maximum they've instigated this assault and attack upon Democracy, Canada, its People, and Humanity.



My point is, it doesn't matter who started this or how, the important thing is these people, Bond, Martin, Howie, Hunt, Dobbs, and their colleagues never challenged this illegal policy and its known consequences and now they're an integral part of this Treason and Crime Against Humanity; they chose their circumstances and have worked hard keeping it.

Carter, would you continue doing what you're doing if you knew it was illegal and harmed? You've asked yourself this and came to the same conclusion I have. No. That's why you took on the monsters of the world and were Good at it, as your respect the Law, Humanity, and have a Reverence for Life.

Carter, these are Big Ideas and Scale and you are not afraid of them, where so many are, as proved by those not responding to my Inquiry and accusations based upon facts. Do you really think those I've contacted will stand up for their parents who are Seniors, as they've condoned the attack upon diabetics and the disabled by not exposing Bond, Martin, Howie, and their gangster colleagues? An Amendment to your Report may help those who have not responded to me, to begin defending Canada and their parents, and their coming future life as Seniors.

*

Should I really fear for my life? Absolutely. This Policy and its consequences are so horrible the Government, Opposition parties, and the Press will not expose this; the Press stops its inquiries with their gong show of interviewing a survivor of an Emerge death or someone disabled due to the long wait – times for surgery. But they never ask where the 50% of clients in Emerge come from, that should not be there according to Emerge doctors, or where the G Ps have disappeared to, or 'the why' of the long wait – times to see a G P, which then see their clients move to Emerge for care. The Press never acknowledge the receipt of the material I send them concerning their reports; why not, as I've done most of the work for them, gov't numbers are available to them, and there is no calculus or statistics to lead them astray to be declared incompetent because they can't apply calculus and special formula; there's only arithmetic, which can be done on their cell phones. The Press doesn't report their investigations, as the lies, misinformation, corruption, breach of Law and Oaths of Office, killings, maiming, and treason is worse than I understand. It's as if I understand the Big Idea correctly, make Connections for Context, but the Scale is Grander than I imagine, or have worked through, or have truly understood the gravity of the killing, criminality, and social dysfunction, where the Press' Managers, Editors, Publishers, and Owners do.



The UN has not addressed this. Of course not, as Canada is one of the inventors of the UN, we pay our fees, and invented the Blue Hats, the Peace Keepers. My dad was a Peace Keeper, 1961 – 62, Palestine. He didn't fight in World War Two only to have this corruption, these Non – Democrats, denigrate Canada, its laws, and people. His brother survived the Hong Kong, Japanese Prisoner of War Death Camps and he didn't go there for these monsters to run Canada a generation later. I write for them also, as they were not afraid of monsters. What about your service in the military? Did you fight for Canada to have these non – democrats do what they're doing?

The UN is afraid of this, as Canada is supposed to be so nice, the place of how to live, a Good working democracy, and a place that demonstrates how to protect Humanity. The U N's fear only solidifies and enhances the perverted behaviour of those involved, as the attack upon Seniors exemplifies. The U N condones what it's supposed to expose.

Human Rights Watch has not responded, as we're supposed to be the Good Guys and the BC HRT is not supposed to bow down to gov't discrimination and harm. They've condoned the failure of the BC HRT to fulfill its Aim, Goal, and Mandate to fight Discrimination. How many others are afraid to acknowledge this? They're afraid for good reason.

Carter, why are so many afraid to acknowledge this illegal policy and its horrific consequences? Because it's worse than I imagine and write about in my letters and explain in depth within the letter 'Updated Consequences'. Remember what the Chief of Police of Winnipeg has just done concerning the death of Brian Sinclair; he buried it and now has a Nurse, living under the threat of Homicide and has given his decision making to some senior Public Servants in a far away place. He's trying to wash his hands of this, trying to make his life clean, where in reality, doing what he has just done, he's soiled himself further. And his attack upon me was not some arbitrary independent act of inquiry but a well thought out attack.

Again, without any challenge the monsters I've exposed have begun an illegal attack upon Seniors. A very specific Class of society, a vulnerable class of people, that needs protection according to Federal TV commercials being played out and yet those I've contacted have demonstrated apathy for the illegal demands upon the disabled, the deaths and maiming, and the denigration of our Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Will they and the Federal Government protect these vulnerable Seniors who the Ombudsperson's Recommendations are defending? They're not protecting them today, as this senior driving policy is being played out now. With this social fear of the monsters I'm confronting one must acknowledged they will kill me, because they are not afraid and we have proof their opponents are afraid of them. These people have no conscience, so why shouldn't they kill me, especially now that I'm challenging them again but through a different Policy. Time has moved me from the diabetic to the Senior diabetic still fighting corruption and Homicide.

My love of life allows me to be afraid of these monsters and continue on, confronting, and exposing them. An Amendment from you would again document your support for Seniors and confront the Senior Abuse coming from the B C Government and its senior Pubic Servants. It would expose the corruption of Science from its “academic researcher”, Dobbs, and her husband to where they just implement unproven Recommendation knowing the harm; where your Recommendations will be stymied or waylaid due to the Scientific Method of Intervention to prove Good and no Harm.

Carter, you need to think about Retribution from those that are attacking me if you write an Amendment.

*



Democracy

Democracy is tentative and the rules composed to run it must be adhered to and the demands fulfilled, and by default, you, as a lawyer, judge, and critical thinker know this, and the people I've exposed are not Democrats but Authoritarians, Fascists, and maybe Nazis, and the killing is Demoside. With the killing of Seniors with this new policy of theirs Genocide comes into Being, as they really are attacking a very specific Class of Humans for no Good reason. The gov't knows what the attack will do because their corrupt “academic researcher”, now referred to as “Dr.”, researches and studies seniors and knows what the frailties are, what attacks from the unknown do, how stressful arbitrary demands are, and what stress does to seniors; and yet she continues her attack through her husband, who's psychological computer toy has not been peer reviewed for Good and non – Harm. “Dr.” who? She's not a medical doctor. So, what do we Classify and Label an “academic researcher” with; who corrupts the Standards of Science she bases her “Dr.” degree upon? What do we Classify and Label an “academic researcher” who knows about Seniors frailties, what harms Seniors, and does so? She uses her husband to feign 'arms length' of association, just as the Chief of Police in Winnipeg has just done.

Democide and Genocide are not acceptable any where on this world, little lone in a Democracy such as Canada. Everything must be done to stop Democide and Genocide, to stop even the most minuscule reference to it that it may be happening, which is accomplished through fulfilling the demands of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, our Human Rights Code, Oaths of Office, Medical Codes of Ethics, and Science Codes of Ethics, the very underpinnings of our “democratic society” , which these Politicians, senior Public Servants, and their corrupt “Dr.” have consciously not fulfilled.

These illegal Government policies do cause the killing that genuine, bona fide, medical “Dr.”s, Emerge Doctors, bring our attention to and I have written about; and these gov't people know this about their policy.

The Big Idea is Democracy and the continuous, demanding, never – ending endeavour to make it work, genuinely work to fulfill the demands, which these people have totally disrespected and abandoned for their own interpretation of Democracy and Life.

*



Who says another Canadian cannot change the World

One hundred years ago two Canadians changed the world; Banting and Best changed the world forever with their discoveries concerning insulin and diabetes. However, look how the Fear of diabetes has corrupted our society since, these corrupt Politicians and senior Public Servants' anti – diabetic policy is a disease in itself, like a virus running amuck, but this one is contrived by monsters and running wild, which is killing them also; the consequences of their policy kills their neighbours, friends, extended family, immediate family, and the naïve bystander walking into Emerge or waiting for surgery; they kill the community they live in; just like a virus, they'll kill the host. As a virus needs to be quarantined and eradicated, these monsters need to be quarantined in jail for the betterment of Humanity and Canada.

Who are these people, people like Bond, Martin, Howie, Dobbs and her husband to say another Canadian cannot change the World for the better? They are Not making the World a better place to live in.

Who's 'our Press' to be afraid of these monsters and their killing and not stand up for Humanity and Canada?

I have our Charter of Rights and Freedoms, our Human Rights Code, and the Trust of our Social Contract supporting me. I have laws such as the Motor Vehicle Act and Oaths of Office on my side. I have the Right to Life supporting me.

I have the best Science in the World supporting me.

These Politicians and senior Public Servants do not have these laws and laws of Humanity supporting them. They feign ignorance of such laws. They use their position of Status, Prestige, Power, Trust, and Money to support their greed, bias, hate, ignorance, fear and loathing, disgust, contempt, prejudice, discrimination, and bigotry. They care nothing for Life. They play at being God. They are wrong morally, ethically, and legally wrong in what they do.



Who are they to say another Canadian cannot change the world and make it a better place for diabetics? Change the world for Universal Health Care Systems by exposing illegal demands upon the UHCS? Change the world and make democracies, such as Canada, follow the law, as is demanded of diabetics, the disabled, and society. Who are they to begin attacking Seniors for another unproven demand upon a very Specific Class of our “democratic society”?

Who are they to say they are allowed to kill and maime people due to their bias, hate, discrimination, prejudice, and bigotry? Those deaths in an Overcrowded Emerge and those waiting for surgery is Democide. One death of a senior and they're guilty of Genocide.

Who are they to say I'm not allowed to make the world a better place? A Place safe from incompetent, cowardly, and corrupt Politicians and absolutely corrupt senior Public Servants?

Who are they to now attack the vulnerable, Seniors.

Who do they attack next?

Carter, I've not been found guilty of anything. No one has proved my demand for change will harm anyone. No one has proved that the changes I demand will harm the UHCS, our Democracy, or the World.

Their “view” of life is Selfserving, Undemocratic, and Homicidal. And we're supposed to follow their “view”of life?

*



Conclusion

Scale. Carter, it's said that diabetes will again double in another ten years, by 2022 it will express in 20% of Canadians, which means 20% of the population of the World; this is in your lifetime Carter; I'll be lucky to be alive as I'll then be 82, four years past the average life for Canadian men. This means 20% of the population of Canada will be denied their Charter Rights and Freedoms, Human Rights, and Rights under the Motor Vehicle Act. How many People does this include for all diseases and medical conditions monitored by the OSMV? The idiots in the car industry. How many of these People already practice bona fide care as I've explained what is done for diabetics?

How are illegal, discriminatory, and bigoted policies such as this going to be implemented when we're 7 or 8 Billion people on the planet in ten or fifteen years? When Canada has a population of 36 million in 2022? That's 7 200 000 diabetics that will have had their Charter Rights and Human Rights forfeited by incompetent, cowardly, and corrupt Politicians and absolutely corrupt senior Public Servants. What will the real demand upon the Public and UHCS, socially, physically, emotionally, and financially, be at this time, as I'm exposing it and the harm today ?

Big Idea. Carter, you see and think for the Future, as I do, as your Report proves. Bond, Martin, Howie, and their Gang members do not work for a better future. They only see Today, Power, and Status. Well, their Pensions also.



How many will be killed and maimed then? How many more Brian Sinclairs then? How many more charades played by Chief's of Police then to cover up these deaths?

How many other Charter Rights and Human Rights will be forfeited to manage the Public and Seniors for this new Canada these monsters visualize and are implementing today, coming from their “view” of life?

The illegal demands will crush the Universal Health Care System and Private Care, as all disabilities will increase, not only due to the growing bubble of the aging population, but pollution, environmental influences, chemicals in our food and food containers, and whatever the unknown nasties are that are causing the rate of diabetes to double every ten years.



These Policies are Old Thinking, based upon Fear and the Unknown, coming from another age where Prejudice and Bigotry were common place and acceptable if some Politician said it was ok, and then the senior Public Servants following along, as the Fascist and Nazis prison guards followed instructions. The trials after WW 2 established this behaviour is not a reasonable excuse for such deviant behaviour and it's not acceptable today; it wasn't accepted in Rwanda, the old Yugoslavia, Myanmar, Tunisia, Libya, Egypt, and Syria, so why is it accepted today in Canada? Government Policy killing large numbers of the Public is Democide; Genocide in a War, Democide in Peace Time.

As the Arab world and other countries fight for Democracy this assault upon Canada's Democracy is not acceptable?

There will be too many developing Democracies demanding we fulfill the demands of our Democracy, as they're basing their Democracy upon ours. These corrupt Politicians and Public Servants are running their own policy in Opposition to the Demands and Objectives of Canada's Constitution and the Crown, and need to be exposed as Traitors and charged with Crimes Against Humanity. Or, as we are not at War, this may be Atrocities against Humanity, Mass Murder, death though indifference to life, reckless endangerment causing death, or negligence causing death; all because they know their behavior cause this. It needs to be stopped, as the law concerning Capital Punishment states one death by Government is too many.



Lastly, Illegal, Dysfunctional, and Unmanageable Policies cannot continue into the future, not within “our Democracy”, maybe in the “phoney democracy” of Bond, Martin, Howie, and their corrupt colleagues, so we might as well begin the process of defending our Democracy and UHCS today by demanding All Government demands upon the UHCS undergo the same rigid, severe criticism, and evaluation for Need, Value, Worth, and Good, as the Public's demands are evaluated today. If not, we won't have a working UHCS and your Recommendations will not come forth during the next few years.

We need to defend Democracy today for tomorrow or we'll have some idiots running our country that are similar to the monster running Russia today; a phoney Democracy, where Charter and Human Rights and the Ombudsperson's Office are things of the past, not because they are not needed, but because they're disavowed. No Democracy, there is No UHCS.

*



An Amendment

Carter, how many people are these Politicians and senior Public Servants going to kill and maime with their illegal diabetic policy? How many with all the disabled policies? And now add the new attack upon Seniors who drive?



This is a small group of very twisted, sad, mentally disturbed Humans that have run amuck. They really are liars, thieves, brutes, bullies, criminals, traitors, and murders. They are sociopaths and psychopaths, as they know their behaviour is illegal and it harms and they care nothing for the harm or demonstrate any empathy for the survivors, or they would have changed their behaviour. Maybe they cannot change because they really have no Conscience? Some Humans don't.

And, as they have not changed their behaviour one must ask; “Why not?”. Why not change? Is it because change, following the law, Canadian and Humanity, is beyond them, as they really are sociopaths and psychopaths?

More importantly, they haven't changed because I think they really like it now; the Illegality, the Criminality, and the Hunt and Killing.

No one is forcing these people, these Politicians and senior Public Servants, to continue on with their illegal policy. They could quit their job. They could expose the illegal policy. They've done nothing to fulfill their Oaths of Office to protect the Public and Canada. They've done the opposite, they've worked extremely hard to cover – up their behaviour, lie, falsify documents, threaten, and assault to protect themselves. They continue on to maximize their pensions.

No one forced these people to invent this new illegal policy that selects a very specific, vulnerable, Class of Society, Seniors, for their new assault upon Humanity.

Carter, they are not like you and I, we do not like or support this kind of killing and anti – Human behaviour; I can say this about you, as you record proves this and as my writing proves for me.

Why is this behaviour allowed on the planet? It isn't and that's what you do. You expose and fight this madness. Why are they allowed to do this in Canada? They really are not allowed to, but in Canada, too many are afraid to stand up, so it continues due to fear, knowing the killing and maiming is happening; pretending Government is legally addressing a driving Problem and the consequences are acceptable. When in reality the Government is the Problem and the Government is doing the killing and trying to hide it, as my letters expose and the charade concerning Sinclair's death exemplifies.

*

This is no difference with this madness than the Genocide, Democide, and Atrocities in any other part of the world; its just a handful of very twisted Canadians doing this to All Canadians. Idiots in the Auto Industry, in love with themselves. People are afraid of these bullies, brutes, and monsters and shut it out, turn their backs on it, or invent the Scapegoat to be slaughtered to deceive the Public that the enemy of society has been vanquished and all is well.

This fear needs to be exposed and an Amendment from your Office would do this. It would balance off the Inequity and Inequality of Evaluation of the demands upon the UHCS, therefore exposing the illegal demands upon G Ps, who will need to be available for any Recommendations for changes or additions to our UHCS for Senior Care. Hopefully those contacted in Manitoba rise to defend their Nurses and health care employees and expose the real killer of Brian Sinclair by exposing this criminal behaviour and illegal demands upon the UHCS and the Public.

An Amendment would expose the corruption within the Solicitor General's Office, as it's had seven or eight Solicitor General's in as many years, as the Office really is corrupt, its senior staff corrupt, as they also know the policy is illegal and contrive and send out letters of lies concerning the policy and its consequences, which they write for the Office, the Solicitor General, and the Press. The Office is corrupt and corrupts those who enter, as the lies coming from the new Solicitor General, concerning the diabetic policy, Martin's attack upon me, and the new Senior Policy exemplifies. Carter, Solicitor General Bond has known about this policy for the same length of time I've been making Inquires about it. She is not a naïve bystander, but a willing participant, as her Political history informs us.

It would expose the corruption concerning the Solicitor General's Office's policies and the assaults upon our Charter of Rights and Freedoms, the Human Rights Code, and the lies concerning the fulfillment of the demands of the Motor Vehicle Act, done in order to implement the policy and its Driver's Medical Examination.

It would expose that our taxes are now shuffled around to pay for the demands of the illegal policies' phoney DME in a charade to marry the payment through the UHCS to make it seem the policy has legal tender. It's not a bona fide demand upon the UHCS, and yet at first blush we see the fee is paid for by the UHCS, which feigns legal tender, but the fee, a debit upon the UHCS, is then reimbursed through the tax base of the Solicitor General's Office. Scale again Carter. Big Ideas of charades and deception. Context to see the shuffle of our tax dollars that should be used for bona fide surgery, Senior Care, or whatever bona fide demand upon the UHCS. As these taxes are used for a demand upon the UHCS they should continue within the realm of Health Care and be transferred from the Budget of the S Gs office to the Ministry of Health for bona fide use offering Good.

It would expose the illegal demands upon the UHCS, therefore the horrific consequences of the policies the Solicitor General's Office and the Ministry of Health admitted to; an Amendment would do so in Public this time for all to see.

It would expose the theft of Science by Dobbs , therefore the corruption of World Standards of Science and the corruption of the World Standards of an Affidavit by Dobbs, the Solicitor General's Office, Martin and Howie, and would expose Dobbs' affiliation with her husband's Human Experiment on Seniors, which is another Crime Against Humanity.

It would expose the arbitrary demands of the Government, which skews our understanding of the demands upon the UHCS and its resources, such as General Practitioners, leaving Seniors with long wait – times to see a G P or go to Emerge.

It would expose how Government attacks the disabled and Seniors today, the vulnerable, for no bona fide reason(s). How the Superintendent and Deputy Superintendent of Motor Vehicles, Martin and Howie's, new attack upon Driving Seniors is another example of how Seniors are not treated with Dignity, Humility, Respect, Equality, and Inclusion within our “democratic society”; no doubt the underpinnings of your Recommendations.

How Seniors are denied their Charter Rights and Freedoms, Human Rights, and Rights under the Motor Vehicle Act, as exemplified within today's diabetic driving policy, disabled driving policy, and how Seniors are not treated as Equal to other Canadians, therefore any expectations of Equality and Inclusion for Seniors, even through the Ombudsperson's Report, should be doubted with the anti – Social and anti – Senior behaviour at this time in our Country. An Amendment would challenge this Senior Abuse as Federal TV commercials and publications are now doing.

With Policies implemented and defended by ignorant, cowardly, incompetent, and corrupt Politicians and absolutely corrupt senior Public Servants, through their perverted “view' of life, how can we, in all honesty, believe these people will change their “view” of life, and implement your Recommendations, as you've proved them incompetent and you are an “Outsider” to their Gang of thugs and traitors.

Also, it seems All Canadians of influence are afraid of this Crime Against Humanity, as they should be, and falsely turned their backs to it. They've addressed the problem incorrectly by pretending they're ostriches and burying their heads in the sand and pretending the monster will go away, that the monster will not kill them, as it kills others. The generation of Canadians turning their backs on Canada, are small, pitiful, and sad people and it's worrisome that they're so naïve, or maybe melancholic about corruption.

Carter, the Politicians and their senior Public Servants' thinking is Group – Think and Wrong – Thinking and the only way to Stop this is to expose the monster and an Amendment to the Ombudsperson's Report could do this.

*

All this would make Canada, therefore, the World a better place to live in;

as the Legal and Social Trust we base our society upon would be re – established; that those in power are indeed complying with the laws of Canada and Humanity when no one is watching them.

as this policy is implemented with various degrees of discrimination throughout the world, especially the so called

“Developed countries”, this exposure would confront the discrimination, prejudice, and bigotry worldwide.

as the policy is not needed and has not been proved to offer any Good, therefore Societal lies, twisted Group – Think, Prejudice, and Bigotry would be exposed and debunked, making Canada a better place for All.

as an Amendment would expose corruption concerning our Charter of Rights and Freedoms and our Human Rights Code. Exposure of this corruption would force our “democratic society” to prove they are bigger than the monsters I've exposed and am challenging, as right now they are afraid of these monsters and what they are doing; Canadians have become Small and Cowardly and this needs to be changed.

as almost all of those contacted by me are Shamed of what some Canadians are doing to our Country and its citizens and have turned their back on Traitors and Democide. They are failing to admit that this apathy is why Democide and Genocide survive to reoccur and reoccur forcing people like you Carter to deal with the Consequences. This Shame needs to be exposed for the betterment of Canada and its citizens. The death of the Scapegoat will not address this Shame.

The Big Idea is to Stop Democide and Genocide before it happens. That's too late with the diabetic policy, but we can Stop it now, and we can Stop the killing of a selected Class of People, Seniors, that will be killed during an illegal, amoral, unethical, unsanctioned Human Experiment, before it happens. One death is too many.

as with our policy against Capital Punishment, a government policy, where not only one Controlled death by Government is too much, but one accidental death due to Capital Punishment, by Government, is too much. This would Stop Government deaths through illegal policy. It would force Canada, Canada's Politicians and senior Public Servants to abide by its own non – Capital Punishment laws.

as it would acknowledge that diabetics do take care of themselves, a fact Politicians and the senior Public Servants cannot and have not acknowledge, as then they would not have an excuse for their policy and would not be able to abuse the diabetic, the disabled, and the Public. Why is it that the monsters I expose cannot acknowledge this Fact, that I visit the G P twenty (20) times for care compared to the one (1) forced time for a medical exam that cannot do what it's alleged to be able to do? Think how deep their Hate, Fear and Loathing, Bias, Prejudice, and Bigotry is to deny this Fact. If you had a disease would you visit your G P more than once every five years for an examination? For an exam that has not been proved to be able to do anything?

The Big Idea here is I'm Classified, Labeled, and forced to undergo a phoney medical exam, etc, etc, just like the Fascists and Nazis registered Jews, Gypsies, the Disabled, and whom ever else they didn't like; like Seniors today. They've set me up as a Social Pariah within our Society with no Charter Rights and Freedoms and Human Rights and this behaviour needs to be exposed to make Canada a better place.

as would you want to be a Senior with health and housing needs, or someone taking care of Seniors who don't know they have health and housing needs and be reliant upon these Politicians and senior Public Servants for Equality and Inclusion in our “democratic society”?

as would you want to go to one (1) of the ten (10) busiest Emerge Facilities, of the one hundred hospitals in B C, for Emerge Care or just care? Especially now you know the “why” of the Overcrowding.



Carter, you're the Lawyer, the Judge, a Judge that's been on the World stage that's exposed and challenged monsters on this World. You know how to write complaints concerning the above and it shouldn't be any different than the exposure and investigations in other places. The laws of Canada and laws concerning Humanity have been broken here also, and these people know it. These people are the monsters of the Human Species and just happen to be in Canada this time.

An Amendment to your Report would expose the 'Inequality of Demands' upon the UHCS, allowing all involved for a True or Factual evaluation of resources available, as at the present time too many G Ps and taxes are used for illegal and unacknowledged demands, therefore our ideas of the UHCS are skewed to the negative to begin with and future Social Policy, policy involving Seniors, will not work as the underpinnings of the UHCS are corrupted by Government itself.

*

Regards





Dave Jenkins





PS; the enclosed letters are Reviews of what has happened to me, therefore the Public and our Charter, since I began my Inquiry in 2002 – 2004. They were written as the Government was stonewalling and falsifying documents in order to defend their illegal policy and its killing.

Just as important is the record of the people and organizations I contacted about this. It's important to see who really is afraid of confronting this monstrosity that is corrupting such a nice country as Canada.

I've enclosed my Deconstruction of Dobbs BC HRT presentation, as she has again raised her corrupt “view” of life with her support of her husbands unethical, amoral, un – Sanctioned Human Experiment upon Seniors and the deconstruction exposes how corrupt her actions are.

The letters of Mar 8 and Apr 20, 2011 give a Good review of what is happening and what the gov't did to me to hide what they're doing, therefore the assault by Martin.

The “Updated Consequences” letter lists Big Ideas, Scale, Connections, for Context which documents the escalation of deviant behaviour and the consequences and how those impact other events.

There is a short letter to the Manitoba Nurses Union and the Winnipeg Regional Health Authority explaining what they don't know and how the Chief of Police is using them as the Scapegoat. And the recent letters to the NDP MLA from Powell River and the reporter reporting about the Senior Policy.

There is a letter addressing “Why Solicitor General Bond needs to Resign” as her response to Martin's attack upon me was covered up, she lied about the legality of the diabetic policy and the breach of the Settlement Agreement.





They will come after you Carter, as well as the new Ombudsperson, if you decide to write an Amendment to defend Canada and Seniors. But remember, making this Public is defense in itself, as exemplified when I exposed Martin to the world after his attack and assault upon me and the denigration of my character after he tried to show me who's Boss. However, they only backed off they didn't dissolve the Gang and their illegal behaviour.

The point is, and we must give the benefit to the unknown, there are some Good people out there as they refused to accept Martin's behaviour, but they don't have enough Power to fire Martin and Howie and expose Bond for the monster she is, or Stop the illegal policy. That's just being naïve isn't it. Their letter of apology really was damage control.

However, who commissioned the Ombudsperson to write a Report? Good people? The very People that need to know the above and enclosed letters, like the lawyers for the dead in Manitoba and the Nurse and Emerge clinic in Winnipeg.