4 pages, 2010 A Review; death, corruption, and the coverup
I learned I was type 2 diabetic in 1999. This meant I must comply to a medical examination in order to drive. I had to pay for this. I began reading about type 2. I researched about diabetes and driving, online.
- The gov't labeling of me as a liability did not make sense. I was Classified as a liability, Labeled as killer, given a number, forced to partake in a senseless Driver's Medical Examination, DME, and will be tracked for the rest of my life.
- Also, the Diabetic Driver's Medical Examination did not make sense.
- I began my inquiry into the diabetic drivers policy 2002-2004 as the DME did not seem valid.
Secondly, the research I read concerning type 2 did not prove there was a so called problem with type 2 diabetic drivers, quite the opposite, the modern science states there is no difference and that even severe hypoglycemia is not a problem when concerning driving. As far as I know research has not disproved these conclusions. There is supposed to be difference in driver mishaps between diabetic and non-diabetic drivers, enough that the diabetic is forced to undergo the phoney DME; don't forget, in Canada doctors are forced to complete the DME.
During 2002-04 the British Columbia, Office of the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles, OSMV, procrastinated about responding to my questions about the policy. It turns out the senior civil servants, or senior government employees, did not have any documents to justify the policy. In their words they base the policy upon the "view" that it is ok to run the policy. This is illegal and corrupt. Civil servants do not have a "view" when concerning policy, laws govern their actions.
- In Canada, our Constitution, Charter of Rights and Freedoms, Section 1 demands the gov't actually prove a bona fide Need before any intervention into society. To actually give the research or documents that prove the Need. They cannot just implement a policy based upon some civil servants "view" of the world. The Constitution and laws were crafted to keep bias, prejudice, hate, ignorance, fear and loathing, disgust, and contempt from ruling the day; to stop civil servants with an agenda and twisted "views". I asked why the OSMV had not fulfilled the demands of the Charter. The OSMV has yet to answer this.
- I stated that without documentation the policy discriminates and is illegal. The gov't said I was free to lodge a Discrimination Complaint with the BC Human Rights Tribunal. I did as Section 8 of the HR Code demands gov't policy be bona fide and reasonably justified. A "view" by unknown civil servants is neither. So, the policy is illegal and discriminates.
- Within HRT Discrimination Complaint, #1954, 2004-2006, the OSMV responded by paraphrasing the Motor Vehicle Act in order to justify the policy against diabetics. They used Sections 25, 29, and 92. However, the legal document they presented paraphrased the statutes. They could have copied or photocopied the statutes as the HRT Response to Complaint Forms give lots of space and additional paper is allowed if needed. In it they forgot the most important words in the statutes; one reads the paraphrasing and believes the OSMV can do what it wants. It can't. The OSMV and the Superintendent are bound by laws so that a personal "view" of some unknowns does not tell Canadians what to do. These words demand the OSMV prove the demand of gov't be proved as bona fide for all the see, documents need to be given. A personal "view" is not good enough or legal. Changing the meaning of the statutes is falsifying legal documents. Reader, now you know how corrupt the gov't is concerning this anti-diabetic policy and it gets worse. So, you must ask,
"WHAT IS SO IMPORTANT THE GOVERNMENT WILL FALSIFY LEGAL DOCUMENTS?"
and
"WHAT IS THE GOVERNMENT TRYING TO COVER UP?"
- So, nothing has been given to legally justify the policy against the diabetic driver. Only a "view" that diabetics need monitoring. This is what is done in totalitarian states, authoritarian states, not democratic societies such as Canada. Fascist and Nazi states, run by unknown civil servants, profess to make their states better buy curing the states woes by the control of certain groups of people, the disabled are one of those groups.
"WHAT IS THE GOV'T COVERING UP?"
As the diabetic drivers policy is based upon the believed Consequences of diabetes, hypoglycemia, low blood sugar, the Consequences of the policy must be acknowledged and addressed. As with everything we do the consequences of our actions or intervention must be acknowledged and reviewed. Reviewed to see the results and if there is any Good. If not, there is discrimination and without Good why do it. To do this we all work through the FIVE POINTS OF ENGAGEMENT. You may label these actions by different names but if you are successful then you work through similar actions.
- First, is there a real bona fide, documented for all to see, a Need for Intervention. NO.
- Second, can the Intervention do what it is alleged to be able to do. That is predict, prevent, and manage hypoglycemia. NO
- Third, are the Consequences acknowledged. NO.
- Four, is there any Good that comes from the Intervention. NO.
- Five, where are we now? Before Intervention.
I was forced to undergo the DME on discovery of diabetes, then again at years end to see how I was managing hypoglycemia, if indeed I was experiencing the condition, and again in two years as I had a Class 4 license, a Commercial license. If only a Private license the return visit is every five years after the second visit. So, one visits the doctor every five years. What does this do? Hold it. Hold it. I have my blood and urine tested every three months as it is proactive medical care and the OSMV knows this. At that visit I also renew my prescription for medication. We also talk about diabetes. So, for the Class 4 license I visit the doctor eight (8) times compared to the one (1) time demanded by the OSMV or twenty (20) times for a private license. Why are diabetics forced to undergo this DME when they are already visiting the doctor for bona fide reasons with bona fide results, bona fide Good, where the DME offers nothing but Harm to the diabetic, sets the diabetic up as Pariah, the Other, by unknown civil servants. The illegal policy also Harms the universal health care system, or medical system, or health care.
The consequences of the DME upon the medical system are horrific.
- The Illegal Policy Consequences change the availability of access to General Practitioners, wait-times increase due to the fact the GP is filling out useless gov't forms that offer NO GOOD.
- Those clients now waiting five to seven days take their needs to the Emerge, therefore OVERCROWDING.
- This impacts those bona fide Emerge clients and the Gov't instigated Overcrowding changes care for all.
This changes Ambulatory care as they cannot deliver their clients to the Overcrowded Emerge.
- This changes Admissions to Emerge instead of through the GP or specialist recommendation.
- The Illegal Policy DME is now payed for from our taxes. Funding is shuffled from the health care funding to pay for this examination that cannot do anything. This funding is enough to pay for all the bona fide wait-list spinal surgeries and more. There would be enough money for more MRI s. There would be more money for Interventions that offer GOOD, you list them.
So the OSMV and the Ministry of Health shuffle designated medical care taxes to pay for the Illegal policy.
To do this they changed the designation of the DME from a Non-Medical Necessity to a Medical Necessity in order to use the tax dollars to pay for the DME. Nothing scientific has happened to make the DME a Medical Necessity, the change is not bona fide. Nothing changed, except my Human Rights Complaint. Before my Discrimination Complaint All disabled drivers needed to pay for this DME. The change came about with my agreement to an Out of Court Settlement Agreement concerning complaint #1954. This change was not instigated and given due to any Good Will on the gov't behave. It was done so that my Human Rights Complaint was not heard in the Public Place. It was done to marry the DME to the Ministry of Health through a form of legitimization of the shuffling of funds to the OSMV, which is under the umbrella of the Solicitor General's office. I imagine it does not have funds for illegal medical demands that offer no Good.
- Is this unacknowledged demand upon the GP the reason why so many GP report unexplained stress, early retirement, lack of fulfillment of doctoring, etc, etc.
THE POLICY
- The Settlement Agreement offered a Draft of the Policy, a Draft offering change to the policy, which I could Review if I wanted. It must be remembered the OSMV never offered a policy to justify the policy in the first instance. How crazy is that. This is another reason why the OSMV and its followers cannot be trusted as to what they say and offer while trying to justify their behaviour.
I agreed to this as it was at least something offering change, maybe. Maybe the OSMV and the anti-diabetics would learn there is no problem, that the policy offers no Good, and they would therefore join the modern world and learn the diabetic is not a Pariah, the Other, a Monster. A monster because a senior civil servant wrote that "most importantly, the policy saves lives." Not proved. I am not a killer. A senior to him wrote that the statement was appropriate. Not proved. So, the diabetic is a killer. It must be true as it comes from senior civil servants. Oh, I forgot we are supposed to believe, to believe on just their "Word". The laws are for them as well as you and me.
Reader, that is the worst thing one can Say or Write about another person, or class of people, or culture. This unproven point of "View" documents the bias, prejudice, hate, ignorance, fear and loathing, disgust, and contempt the government has for people of difference.
Why government and not just these two idiots? Because gov't has not had the professionalism or humanity to apologize or retract the statement. They have left it in a reversal of what is really happening, reverse reality to cover up what they are doing, reverse reality to misdirect the public from inquiring about the diabetic. The government policy is killing and maiming people not the diabetic. But they have implanted the killing idea into the public space so the public just accepts this as the Canadian gov't would not state such a horrific thing against someone unless it was true.
They did not learn anything. The Draft is again, full of bias, prejudice, hate, ignorance, fear and loathing, disgust, and contempt for the diabetic, accepted social standards, and human and legal rights. I Deconstructed the hate article for what it is. This was late 2006 early 2007. No policy arrived.
- In 2008 I lodged another HR Discrimination Complaint as I am legally allowed to do, #5791. The BC HRT decided to give the OSMV more time to complete the Review of the Whole Driving Policy, not just the diabetic policy. You ask yourself why they did this as the OSMV has had thirty or forty years to document the policy, at least since my inquiry of 2002. Why not make the OSMV give me a copy of the Policy on Diabetic Drivers before government publication of a whole policy? It is now Jan 2010 and the anti-diabetic policy is not legal and the consequences of the policy are still killing and maiming people.
Why didn't the HRT demand the policy be put on hold until a decision about the policy be made?
- Reader, within this complaint the OSMV offered 174 scientific articles on diabetes, driving, and what I call other stuff to justify the policy, just padding. Plus 15 articles on Thyroid. This Thyroid stuff is beyond me. The stuff and Thyroid is called padding the documents. It is all BBB. Not bbb or bBb or BbB but BBB, Bullshit Baffles Brains. The presentation is from a so called Academic Researcher, someone with a PhD.
Most of the articles are from the Who's Who in scientific publishing and research. Their work is protected by Copyright, Intellectual Property Rights Protection, and Intent of Use Protection. Not one Permission Form was offered by the OSMV and its counsel. This means the scientific articles were stolen. So, scientific articles are stolen and used to justify a Canadian social policy. Are we, as Canadians that low, that slimy, that corrupt that we need to steal science to justify our social policy? The academic researcher knows she needs Permission as at the bottom of each page there is a stamp that says internal use only. A HRT presentation is not internal, it is very public. The presentation is not protected as Privileged material.
These scientific articles were presented within a HRT Early Dismiss Application where only one HRT member evaluates the Discrimination Complaint, where the Public and owners of the research would not know the scientific work had been stolen and used to justify the illegal policy and its years of horrific harm.
Reader, who are the real monsters here?
"HOW MANY PEOPLE HAVE DIED OR BEEN MAIMED IN EMERGE DUE TO THE CONSEQUENCES OF THE ILLEGAL POLICY?"
"HOW MANY PEOPLE ON SURGERY WAIT-LISTS HAVE NEEDLESSLY DIED, OR BEEN MAIMED, OR BECOME ADDICTED TO THE ADDICTIVE DRUGS THEY USE FOR PAIN MANAGEMENT while their bona fide needs are not attended to?"
"HOW MANY PEOPLE HAVE DIED, OR BEEN MAIMED, OR BECOME ADDICTED SINCE 2006 WHEN FUNDING WAS SHUFFLED TO PAY FOR THE ILLEGAL DME?"
Lastly, the above and the following postings concerning the Consequences of the Policy is just for diabetes. The OSMV supposedly manages over one hundred (100) medical conditions.
When this policy is understood with a Wholeness, which the gov't does not want to acknowledge, today supposedly 9% of society is diabetic and 75% of our society are drivers, approximately 35 - 40 doctors are needed to fulfill the DME for diabetes, 8 hours as day, 5 days a week. So, does this mean 35 doctors times 100 other medical conditions equals 3500 doctors used for the illegal wants of the OSMV, the auto motive industry. This is what it is, the car industry and those boys with too much testosterone and those girls with too much estrogen.
There are only about 4500 GP in BC.
I don't believe it really is this many but how many is it? Even if it is only 10 doctors per medical condition that is still 1000 GP filling out OSMV Forms. That's 25 % of the GP available.
If at 5 doctors per medical condition that is still 500 GP just filling out OSMV Forms.
And we wonder where the GP have gone?
- There are only TWO user groups in the UNIVERSAL HEALTH CARE SYSTEM, THE PUBLIC AND THE GOVERNMENT.
And if none of this is publicly acknowledged by the OSMV that means the illegal demand is not funded or managed.
And what does this say about other gov't offices making demands upon the universal health care system, its funding, and the public?
So, if you are diabetic, or disabled, or have had someone die or be maimed in Emerge, or while waiting for surgery maybe you should get a lawyer. The Human Rights Complaint #5791 is written up by the BC Human Rights Tribunal. # 1954 is not as it was canceled with the out of court settlement agreement. However, when I realized that other disabled drivers were not reimbursed their DME fees as I was I wrote the OSMV and asked why. The OSMV would not respond so I lodged a Representative HRT discrimination complaint. After some letters back and forth with the HRT it was decided the OSMV should respond to my letters of inquiry and HRT complaint. So, the HRT forced the OSMV to respond. However, the complaint was not heard as it was determined I had not complained within the six month Timeline concerning complaints and when they happened. It is important that to remember that my complaint was not heard not through a lack of merit or value or worth but only a Timeline restriction. It just took me a while to understand the Consequences of the settlement agreement. This means if you or you know someone that has paid DME fees before July 2006 they could lodge a complaint to the OSMV and demand fee reimbursement for those years before 2006.
- The gov't labeling of me as a liability did not make sense. I was Classified as a liability, Labeled as killer, given a number, forced to partake in a senseless Driver's Medical Examination, DME, and will be tracked for the rest of my life.
- Also, the Diabetic Driver's Medical Examination did not make sense.
- I began my inquiry into the diabetic drivers policy 2002-2004 as the DME did not seem valid.
Secondly, the research I read concerning type 2 did not prove there was a so called problem with type 2 diabetic drivers, quite the opposite, the modern science states there is no difference and that even severe hypoglycemia is not a problem when concerning driving. As far as I know research has not disproved these conclusions. There is supposed to be difference in driver mishaps between diabetic and non-diabetic drivers, enough that the diabetic is forced to undergo the phoney DME; don't forget, in Canada doctors are forced to complete the DME.
During 2002-04 the British Columbia, Office of the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles, OSMV, procrastinated about responding to my questions about the policy. It turns out the senior civil servants, or senior government employees, did not have any documents to justify the policy. In their words they base the policy upon the "view" that it is ok to run the policy. This is illegal and corrupt. Civil servants do not have a "view" when concerning policy, laws govern their actions.
- In Canada, our Constitution, Charter of Rights and Freedoms, Section 1 demands the gov't actually prove a bona fide Need before any intervention into society. To actually give the research or documents that prove the Need. They cannot just implement a policy based upon some civil servants "view" of the world. The Constitution and laws were crafted to keep bias, prejudice, hate, ignorance, fear and loathing, disgust, and contempt from ruling the day; to stop civil servants with an agenda and twisted "views". I asked why the OSMV had not fulfilled the demands of the Charter. The OSMV has yet to answer this.
- I stated that without documentation the policy discriminates and is illegal. The gov't said I was free to lodge a Discrimination Complaint with the BC Human Rights Tribunal. I did as Section 8 of the HR Code demands gov't policy be bona fide and reasonably justified. A "view" by unknown civil servants is neither. So, the policy is illegal and discriminates.
- Within HRT Discrimination Complaint, #1954, 2004-2006, the OSMV responded by paraphrasing the Motor Vehicle Act in order to justify the policy against diabetics. They used Sections 25, 29, and 92. However, the legal document they presented paraphrased the statutes. They could have copied or photocopied the statutes as the HRT Response to Complaint Forms give lots of space and additional paper is allowed if needed. In it they forgot the most important words in the statutes; one reads the paraphrasing and believes the OSMV can do what it wants. It can't. The OSMV and the Superintendent are bound by laws so that a personal "view" of some unknowns does not tell Canadians what to do. These words demand the OSMV prove the demand of gov't be proved as bona fide for all the see, documents need to be given. A personal "view" is not good enough or legal. Changing the meaning of the statutes is falsifying legal documents. Reader, now you know how corrupt the gov't is concerning this anti-diabetic policy and it gets worse. So, you must ask,
"WHAT IS SO IMPORTANT THE GOVERNMENT WILL FALSIFY LEGAL DOCUMENTS?"
and
"WHAT IS THE GOVERNMENT TRYING TO COVER UP?"
- So, nothing has been given to legally justify the policy against the diabetic driver. Only a "view" that diabetics need monitoring. This is what is done in totalitarian states, authoritarian states, not democratic societies such as Canada. Fascist and Nazi states, run by unknown civil servants, profess to make their states better buy curing the states woes by the control of certain groups of people, the disabled are one of those groups.
"WHAT IS THE GOV'T COVERING UP?"
As the diabetic drivers policy is based upon the believed Consequences of diabetes, hypoglycemia, low blood sugar, the Consequences of the policy must be acknowledged and addressed. As with everything we do the consequences of our actions or intervention must be acknowledged and reviewed. Reviewed to see the results and if there is any Good. If not, there is discrimination and without Good why do it. To do this we all work through the FIVE POINTS OF ENGAGEMENT. You may label these actions by different names but if you are successful then you work through similar actions.
- First, is there a real bona fide, documented for all to see, a Need for Intervention. NO.
- Second, can the Intervention do what it is alleged to be able to do. That is predict, prevent, and manage hypoglycemia. NO
- Third, are the Consequences acknowledged. NO.
- Four, is there any Good that comes from the Intervention. NO.
- Five, where are we now? Before Intervention.
I was forced to undergo the DME on discovery of diabetes, then again at years end to see how I was managing hypoglycemia, if indeed I was experiencing the condition, and again in two years as I had a Class 4 license, a Commercial license. If only a Private license the return visit is every five years after the second visit. So, one visits the doctor every five years. What does this do? Hold it. Hold it. I have my blood and urine tested every three months as it is proactive medical care and the OSMV knows this. At that visit I also renew my prescription for medication. We also talk about diabetes. So, for the Class 4 license I visit the doctor eight (8) times compared to the one (1) time demanded by the OSMV or twenty (20) times for a private license. Why are diabetics forced to undergo this DME when they are already visiting the doctor for bona fide reasons with bona fide results, bona fide Good, where the DME offers nothing but Harm to the diabetic, sets the diabetic up as Pariah, the Other, by unknown civil servants. The illegal policy also Harms the universal health care system, or medical system, or health care.
The consequences of the DME upon the medical system are horrific.
- The Illegal Policy Consequences change the availability of access to General Practitioners, wait-times increase due to the fact the GP is filling out useless gov't forms that offer NO GOOD.
- Those clients now waiting five to seven days take their needs to the Emerge, therefore OVERCROWDING.
- This impacts those bona fide Emerge clients and the Gov't instigated Overcrowding changes care for all.
This changes Ambulatory care as they cannot deliver their clients to the Overcrowded Emerge.
- This changes Admissions to Emerge instead of through the GP or specialist recommendation.
- The Illegal Policy DME is now payed for from our taxes. Funding is shuffled from the health care funding to pay for this examination that cannot do anything. This funding is enough to pay for all the bona fide wait-list spinal surgeries and more. There would be enough money for more MRI s. There would be more money for Interventions that offer GOOD, you list them.
So the OSMV and the Ministry of Health shuffle designated medical care taxes to pay for the Illegal policy.
To do this they changed the designation of the DME from a Non-Medical Necessity to a Medical Necessity in order to use the tax dollars to pay for the DME. Nothing scientific has happened to make the DME a Medical Necessity, the change is not bona fide. Nothing changed, except my Human Rights Complaint. Before my Discrimination Complaint All disabled drivers needed to pay for this DME. The change came about with my agreement to an Out of Court Settlement Agreement concerning complaint #1954. This change was not instigated and given due to any Good Will on the gov't behave. It was done so that my Human Rights Complaint was not heard in the Public Place. It was done to marry the DME to the Ministry of Health through a form of legitimization of the shuffling of funds to the OSMV, which is under the umbrella of the Solicitor General's office. I imagine it does not have funds for illegal medical demands that offer no Good.
- Is this unacknowledged demand upon the GP the reason why so many GP report unexplained stress, early retirement, lack of fulfillment of doctoring, etc, etc.
THE POLICY
- The Settlement Agreement offered a Draft of the Policy, a Draft offering change to the policy, which I could Review if I wanted. It must be remembered the OSMV never offered a policy to justify the policy in the first instance. How crazy is that. This is another reason why the OSMV and its followers cannot be trusted as to what they say and offer while trying to justify their behaviour.
I agreed to this as it was at least something offering change, maybe. Maybe the OSMV and the anti-diabetics would learn there is no problem, that the policy offers no Good, and they would therefore join the modern world and learn the diabetic is not a Pariah, the Other, a Monster. A monster because a senior civil servant wrote that "most importantly, the policy saves lives." Not proved. I am not a killer. A senior to him wrote that the statement was appropriate. Not proved. So, the diabetic is a killer. It must be true as it comes from senior civil servants. Oh, I forgot we are supposed to believe, to believe on just their "Word". The laws are for them as well as you and me.
Reader, that is the worst thing one can Say or Write about another person, or class of people, or culture. This unproven point of "View" documents the bias, prejudice, hate, ignorance, fear and loathing, disgust, and contempt the government has for people of difference.
Why government and not just these two idiots? Because gov't has not had the professionalism or humanity to apologize or retract the statement. They have left it in a reversal of what is really happening, reverse reality to cover up what they are doing, reverse reality to misdirect the public from inquiring about the diabetic. The government policy is killing and maiming people not the diabetic. But they have implanted the killing idea into the public space so the public just accepts this as the Canadian gov't would not state such a horrific thing against someone unless it was true.
They did not learn anything. The Draft is again, full of bias, prejudice, hate, ignorance, fear and loathing, disgust, and contempt for the diabetic, accepted social standards, and human and legal rights. I Deconstructed the hate article for what it is. This was late 2006 early 2007. No policy arrived.
- In 2008 I lodged another HR Discrimination Complaint as I am legally allowed to do, #5791. The BC HRT decided to give the OSMV more time to complete the Review of the Whole Driving Policy, not just the diabetic policy. You ask yourself why they did this as the OSMV has had thirty or forty years to document the policy, at least since my inquiry of 2002. Why not make the OSMV give me a copy of the Policy on Diabetic Drivers before government publication of a whole policy? It is now Jan 2010 and the anti-diabetic policy is not legal and the consequences of the policy are still killing and maiming people.
Why didn't the HRT demand the policy be put on hold until a decision about the policy be made?
- Reader, within this complaint the OSMV offered 174 scientific articles on diabetes, driving, and what I call other stuff to justify the policy, just padding. Plus 15 articles on Thyroid. This Thyroid stuff is beyond me. The stuff and Thyroid is called padding the documents. It is all BBB. Not bbb or bBb or BbB but BBB, Bullshit Baffles Brains. The presentation is from a so called Academic Researcher, someone with a PhD.
Most of the articles are from the Who's Who in scientific publishing and research. Their work is protected by Copyright, Intellectual Property Rights Protection, and Intent of Use Protection. Not one Permission Form was offered by the OSMV and its counsel. This means the scientific articles were stolen. So, scientific articles are stolen and used to justify a Canadian social policy. Are we, as Canadians that low, that slimy, that corrupt that we need to steal science to justify our social policy? The academic researcher knows she needs Permission as at the bottom of each page there is a stamp that says internal use only. A HRT presentation is not internal, it is very public. The presentation is not protected as Privileged material.
These scientific articles were presented within a HRT Early Dismiss Application where only one HRT member evaluates the Discrimination Complaint, where the Public and owners of the research would not know the scientific work had been stolen and used to justify the illegal policy and its years of horrific harm.
Reader, who are the real monsters here?
"HOW MANY PEOPLE HAVE DIED OR BEEN MAIMED IN EMERGE DUE TO THE CONSEQUENCES OF THE ILLEGAL POLICY?"
"HOW MANY PEOPLE ON SURGERY WAIT-LISTS HAVE NEEDLESSLY DIED, OR BEEN MAIMED, OR BECOME ADDICTED TO THE ADDICTIVE DRUGS THEY USE FOR PAIN MANAGEMENT while their bona fide needs are not attended to?"
"HOW MANY PEOPLE HAVE DIED, OR BEEN MAIMED, OR BECOME ADDICTED SINCE 2006 WHEN FUNDING WAS SHUFFLED TO PAY FOR THE ILLEGAL DME?"
Lastly, the above and the following postings concerning the Consequences of the Policy is just for diabetes. The OSMV supposedly manages over one hundred (100) medical conditions.
When this policy is understood with a Wholeness, which the gov't does not want to acknowledge, today supposedly 9% of society is diabetic and 75% of our society are drivers, approximately 35 - 40 doctors are needed to fulfill the DME for diabetes, 8 hours as day, 5 days a week. So, does this mean 35 doctors times 100 other medical conditions equals 3500 doctors used for the illegal wants of the OSMV, the auto motive industry. This is what it is, the car industry and those boys with too much testosterone and those girls with too much estrogen.
There are only about 4500 GP in BC.
I don't believe it really is this many but how many is it? Even if it is only 10 doctors per medical condition that is still 1000 GP filling out OSMV Forms. That's 25 % of the GP available.
If at 5 doctors per medical condition that is still 500 GP just filling out OSMV Forms.
And we wonder where the GP have gone?
- There are only TWO user groups in the UNIVERSAL HEALTH CARE SYSTEM, THE PUBLIC AND THE GOVERNMENT.
And if none of this is publicly acknowledged by the OSMV that means the illegal demand is not funded or managed.
And what does this say about other gov't offices making demands upon the universal health care system, its funding, and the public?
So, if you are diabetic, or disabled, or have had someone die or be maimed in Emerge, or while waiting for surgery maybe you should get a lawyer. The Human Rights Complaint #5791 is written up by the BC Human Rights Tribunal. # 1954 is not as it was canceled with the out of court settlement agreement. However, when I realized that other disabled drivers were not reimbursed their DME fees as I was I wrote the OSMV and asked why. The OSMV would not respond so I lodged a Representative HRT discrimination complaint. After some letters back and forth with the HRT it was decided the OSMV should respond to my letters of inquiry and HRT complaint. So, the HRT forced the OSMV to respond. However, the complaint was not heard as it was determined I had not complained within the six month Timeline concerning complaints and when they happened. It is important that to remember that my complaint was not heard not through a lack of merit or value or worth but only a Timeline restriction. It just took me a while to understand the Consequences of the settlement agreement. This means if you or you know someone that has paid DME fees before July 2006 they could lodge a complaint to the OSMV and demand fee reimbursement for those years before 2006.
posted by type 2 at
6:55 AM
1 Comments
