4 pp, Oct 7 2002, to BC Solicitor General, response to his letter of Aug 14, he resigned due to allegations of corruption before responding
Dave Jenkins
3107 Tanglewood Way
Nanaimo, BC, V9T 5A5
October 22, 2009
Ministry of Public Safety and Solicitor General
Honourable Kash Heed
PO Box 9053 Stn Prov Govt
Victoria, BC, V8W 9J7
re: Driver's Medical Examination Form, from OSMV; postal date, 090730
re: my inquiry into the diabetic driver's policy and my human rights discrimination complaints #1954, 5699, and 5791.
re: letter of Oct 7, 2009
Dear Honourable Kash Heed,
Thank you for the reply of Oct 7, 2009.
However, whom ever wrote the letter for you is a liar. They have misinformed you about what has/is really going on concerning the “driver fitness policies” and the “settlement of your Previous Human Rights complaint relating to these issues”. This is the first time I have used that word since my initial inquiry of 2002, concerning the diabetic driver's policy.
You have not been involved in this inquiry but the civil servants that have been offer misleading information, instigated a policy that is not legal as it has never been legally justified, are hiding the horrific consequences of their actions, broke the settlement agreement and not renewed it, and will do anything, besides killing me, to defend their actions. And now they have you, a very real naïve bystander, signing a document that is a lie, in order to protect themselves. It intentionally misleads the reader as to what the illegal policy is, the state of the discrimination complaints, and your responsibility, as Solicitor General, as the overriding manager of the OSMV and its actions, to investigate its behaviour; not to tell a voter to go get a lawyer when it is very clear there are so many things wrong. It seems you are the scapegoat or fall guy this time for the corrupt civil servants involved.
The lie is to protect themselves. The lie is to protect you? The lie is to protect the civil servants involved in the illegal diabetic driver's policy? The lie is to protect those civil servants involved in the discriminatory policy? The lie is to protect you from the responsibility of the horrific consequences of the policy. The lie is to protect the OSMV from the horrific consequences of the policy? The lie is so that civil servants are not held accountable for their actions?
(The Gomery commission wrote that civil servants need to be held accountable for their actions. This means the all those civil servants that are responsible for this illegal policy, the consequences, and those that are supporting it. This means you, the Publics Representative, the person voted into position, the position of status, trust, power, and prestige must challenged them. You do not work for them. They work for you. They work for me. You work for me, the public. You do not need to accept their disinformation, misinformation, or lies or their lack of accountability. The previous S G's did not challenge them or demand they obey the law or we would not be here now. They must have refused to deal with this corruption and that is why you are now involved, you have inherited corruption. Not something anyone wants to inherit. They left deviant behaviour unchallenged and that is why you are now being lied to. Corruption begets corruption.
Welcome to the world of diabetes. Welcome to the world of the minority you are not part of. People who have their Human Rights and Legal Rights removed, taken away, unnoticed, unobserved, un-noted, overlooked, unheeded, neglected, ignored, and disregarded due to color or religion or disposition. The forfeiture of Human Rights and Law due to some civil servants point of “view”. Now that is arrogance, discrimination, and corruption.
All due to the Deputy's “view” that diabetic drivers or diabetics are a liability to society. Just like discriminatory belief or “view” that women cannot do things men can do. Like the racist, discriminatory belief or “view” that people of color cannot do what people of non-color can do. Absolute corruption.
Solicitor General, it is your job to defend Human Rights and Legal Rights. No matter if outside gov't or within. You swore an Oath to defend against crime and deviant behaviour and whatever else is in that Oath to keep our society a place of Human Rights and Law? It is your job to attack those of bias, prejudice, hate, ignorance, fear and loathing, disgust, and contempt. The very things racism, prejudice, discrimination, lies are based upon.
You do it for me so that when some bright bigot tries to take your Human Rights and Law away support is not there for them. Support to send letters out to you that say, Get a lawyer if you do not like us taking your Human Rights and Legal Rights away.)
Solicitor General, if you really wrote the letter then you have been misinformed, misled, lied to, and manipulated for those that are protecting themselves and now using you as their scapegoat, the fall guy. Just as the Deputy Superintendent of Motor Vehicles blamed some underling for breaching the settlement agreement you have just written about, she used a fall guy, the scapegoat, to protect herself. The charade concerning the breached settlement agreement also has a fall guy, the scapegoat; used as a ruse to not renew the settlement agreement. The HRT is used as the fall guy or scapegoat in concern with the theft of the scientific documents, used to try and justify the policy and its horrific consequences. And now you are being used as the fall guy, the scapegoat, for the illegal policy, and the wrongs associated with this policy.
Solicitor General, I do not know how long you have been in office but it definitely takes a few years to understand the office. Therefore, you rely upon unknown people to give you the truth, the correct facts, not their belief or “view” of things. You manage the OSMV. The Deputy Superintendent bases the anti-diabetic policy upon some civil servants “view” of the world. Not good enough. Not good enough for the Superintendent as he has been in position for three or four years now. There are laws to follow, the MVA binds them and the OSMV has not fulfilled the demands of the Law. As a matter of fact the OSMV has changed the wording of the Motor Vehicle Act to get its way against the diabetic. To justify the horrific consequences of the policy. This is your business to stand up to. To stand up to those that break the law.
If I don't fulfill the diabetic Driver's Medical Examination that is being demanded of me right now you will charge me with breaking the law and cancel my license. So, you will attack me for not complying with an illegal policy, then you need to attack the law breakers in your own office.
Solicitor General, you don't tell me to get a lawyer, you attack those that are manipulating you and forcing people to comply with this demand, done under false pretense. There is intent to mislead the public, the diabetic driver, and now you about the diabetic as a liability. The OSMV has never fulfilled the demands of the MVA, therefore the demand is wrong and illegal. The OSMV is lying to you if they inform you that the policy has been justified with any documents. It's based upon bias, prejudice, hate, ignorance, fear and loathing, disgust, and contempt, all giving a “view” that it is ok to break the law and discriminate. That is why your staff have lied to you about me challenging the illegal policy.
You should inform them that they will need a lawyer to explain themselves as you are about to inform the RCMP about what is really happening as it should have been done through the previous S Gs. That you are hiring a third party to investigate the policy. That you are stopping the policy against diabetics because it has not been proved to be able to do anything except denigrate the diabetic. That you are not going to be their scapegoat or fall guy. A lawyer not funded by your and my taxes will be needed as they have used the Attorney General's resources which also hired private counsel to deny and protect the wrong of discrimination and an illegal policy and that is not going to happen anymore.
Did they inform you the policy against diabetic has never been legally justified? What does that say about the people that are supposed to be informing you about what is going on? What does that say about all the other medical conditions the OSMV supposedly manages? What does this say about how grand the consequences of the illegal policy?
*
Solicitor General, have these people informed you that the Deputy wrote that the driver fitness policy against diabetic drivers is based upon the “view” that it is ok to do? Are these the same people that have just lied to you?
Have they informed you that the OSMV changed the wording of Motor Vehicle Act to mislead the public into believing the policy is legal and bona fide? My complaint is based upon the real wording of the MVA.
Have they informed you that the policy has not fulfilled the demands of the Charter, another tool used against me, but no documents offered to prove the OSMV has fulfilled the demand?
Have they informed you that the demands of the Human Rights Code have not been fulfilled?
Have they informed you that gov't instructed me, condescendingly, to lodge a complaint to the HRT. Are these the same people that have written the Oct 7 letter and just told me to get a lawyer, through your position? They use you so they do not have to take responsibility or be held accountable for their actions, defer that to your letterhead and position?
Have they told you that the OSMV broke the settlement agreement and played a charade to cover it up? To make it seem the settlement agreement is still valid? The October 7 letter informs readers the settlement agreement is valid, it is not. The OSMV broken the settlement agreement and that is why I lodged a second HR complaint, #5791, concerning the diabetic drivers policy as the OSMV has had ample time, years, to justify the policy, and they have not.
Solicitor General, those that have informed you that the settlement agreement is still valid are liars. Your staff are corrupt, not you, not me.
Have they told you that they stole science and presented it, in #5791, to justify the policy? That they lied about it when I caught them?
Have they informed you of the real consequences of the policy? Other than turning me into a pariah, the Other. Have they informed you that the OSMV informed me they know about the harm to the medical system. And they have continued with the policy knowing the harm and knowing the policy is illegal. Have they told you the consequences are part of or the reason for the overcrowding of the Emergency Facilities and shortage of General Practitioners as maybe, just maybe, 18 or 20 % of G Ps are filling out forms for the OSMV and all its conditions that it supposedly manages.
Imagine the killing and maiming, the slaughter, due to some civil servant “view” of the diabetic.
It is interesting that none of the above have been mentioned in the letter written for you. The letter is contrived to mislead the reader, as if all is well and the OSMV is working in Good faith to fulfill their commitment to an ongoing settlement agreement. No such thing. If there was any Good Faith or Good Will the settlement agreement would have been renewed. It hasn't been. If there was any Good Faith or Good Will the policy would have been put on hold until real, bona fide research could prove a need. Science to prove the intervention would not be worse than the problem. Nothing has been done to prove Good or Good Will by the OSMV, so the inference that they are Good and the policy offers Good is just more of the misleading information and lies about the policy. Your office manages the OSMV. Your office has the obligation to fulfill the settlement agreement, to renew it, as I did not break it. You need to demand the civil servants involved start being responsible and accountable concerning this illegal policy, the discrimination, the horrific consequences, and misleading information concerning the policy and my endeavours to correct a social policy gone amuck.
Solicitor General, whether you like this or not you need to take these people to task as it is clear they cannot manage themselves as they have gone too far and do not know how to stop.
What are you going to do when in their “view” it is ok to do this to you, your wife, your kids, your parents?
*
Solicitor General, two weeks ago you were on TV, a local NEWS program, speaking in the Legislature, denying people were going to loose their Rights. Sorry, but I missed who you were defending. Who you were attacking for misleading or lying to the public.
My point is, your language, tone, and body language seemed truthful and done with passion. So, if you will fight for the Rights of whom ever you were supporting why not me?
Why have you just told me to get a lawyer?
Why has your staff lied to you about my HR Complaint (s) and what they are really doing?
Solicitor General, you belong to a minority, just as I do. You are with the 'Visible Minority Classification'.
I am also Classified.
Classified as a liability to society, based upon some civil servants “view” of the world. I am then labeled and given a number. Forced to undergo a medical examination that cannot do what it is alleged to be able to do. The Classification has never been proved to offer any Good. The consequences of the policy against me are horrific. I will be tracked for the rest of my life. Laws never fulfilled and laws changed by civil servants to keep me in my place.
Diabetes is like color, it never goes away, however it is invisible until labeled or spoken about.
These facts present me as if I am their Nigger, or Jew Boy, or Hindu or what is the new derogatory term used to create fear and loathing and the forfeiture of Human Rights and Law to the Other, a Muslim or Muslim bitch.
Solicitor General, I think it fair to say your parents and mine, and you and me, and our society fought against bias, bigotry, prejudice and discrimination to change the accepted social policy of their time, since World War 2.
Today, People of Color and Religion are not designated a place to live in within the Lower Mainland or BC or Canada. The work our parents did for you and me and country always needs to be fought. Discrimination, prejudice, hate, fear and loathing, disgust, contempt is never eradicated but only slips away to resurface again. It is within this complaint.
You know what I am talking about. You see it in their eyes and language.
So, lets review. You can live where you like. You can practice any religion. Your kids, if you have any, can go to school where they like. Your wife, if you have a wife, can work, be educated, travel, etc etc; her choice. You have become a politician and been given/earned a Ministry in a Democratic Society (from the Charter). You were voted in by folks like me. You did not change color after you were voted in. You stand up in the Legislature, a very public Place, and demand Rights. Human Rights. Legal Rights are part of this. That you will defend Human Rights.
Then why not me when it comes to this illegal policy?
What is being done to me is bigger than anything in your Ministry. It is the biggest thing you as a person will be confronted with. It is bigger than anything you as a politician will be involved in. It's about gov't corruption and it involves a lot of people. It involves how people see and treat people.
If the Premier can talk about his Driving Under the Influence, take the responsibility for his actions, and change why not the civil servants doing this to me. Why are they allowed to jeopardize your political career? Why are they allowed to falsely charge me with being a liability to society. Why are they allowed to make destructive demands upon the medical system leading to the unexpected and unexplained deaths and maiming of those naïve bystanders using the Emerge and blame those consequences upon the diabetic, falsely leading the public to believe the diabetic needs monitoring at all cost.
If you don't think this will happen to you and your family, why not? It is really happening to me now. They will just say this about you, your wife, and your kids. They will say in our “view” it is ok to do. Or they will offer research from the 1850s that said non-whites had smaller brains than whites, therefore the rules of Law and Human Rights, and pain to not apply to non-whites. Or some Apartheid research from the old South Africa or the old USA or Canada's treatment of First Nations people.
And your staff or you told me to get a lawyer. You need to stand up to what you believe in and said in the Legislature. Those that will hate you for your actions supporting me, already hate you, so you don't need to worry about their hate and prejudice. If you loose you position in gov't you can at least report to your Constituency and the Public about why you were fired, demoted, or sent to the back benches. If this happens, you will really be able to stand up and say your political career was indeed short but you changed the world.
*
Solicitor General you work for me, the public, its guys and gals like me that voted you in. It is not your job to support corrupt policy or social policy that has never been legally justified, which the Charter, the HR Code, and the MVA demands, whether these people like this or not.
There are laws to follow and it is not up to me to hire “BC Human Rights Clinic, the UBC Law Students Legal Advice Program, or the University of Victoria Law Centre.” in order for me to enjoy my Human Rights or Legal Rights. The gov't has a duty to guarantee them. Then one may challenge if the action is discriminatory. You need to enforce the law in the first place as it has not been fulfilled.
It is your job as you represent the public to confront those that are involved even if it is your staff and a policy before your time. You can't go the Attorney General's office as that office is protecting those involved and the illegal policy. I believe it was responsible for changing the wording of the MVA to falsely justify the policy. It also contrived the charade to misinform about the breached settlement agreement. It hired the private firm that presented the stolen research. In other words the A G's office presented stolen documents to justify the policy. It was wrong to do so. They lied about their actions. I caught them at it. The lie was to change a legal document concerning the stolen research. A lie to change a legal document? That was wrong too. I caught them at that also. If these people do not know it is wrong to do such things, then why are they in positions where they continue to do wrong? Elected officials and bona fide civil servants have had seven years to stand up to them as that is how long I have been inquiring.
Solicitor General, the policy is illegal and that is why you need to investigate. To hire a third party, the RCMP, to investigate corruption, as I did with the BC HRT. To investigate why the OSMV, your office, has implemented a social policy that has not been legally justified. Discrimination comes from that action also. To investigate the breached settlement agreement and the charade. To investigate the stolen research. To investigate the lie about the scope of the complaint and how that was used to change a legal document in order to decrease the number of stolen scientific research items presented, to decrease the harm, as a form of damage control. To investigate the new DME Form that has the MVA wording changed again, done in order to deceive the reader and all concerned and force the diabetic to conform under the threat of loosing one's license, which is all done through false pretenses that the policy is legal.
Don't let these people turn you into their boy as they would like to do. The October 7 letter is their first step in concern with this illegal policy and breach of Human Rights and Legal Rights and of having you be their boy, disregarding your Human Rights and Legal Rights, and the Oath of Office to obey the Law and do no wrong and support no wrong.
Why else would they tell you to not respond and tell him to get a lawyer. Those in the wrong always inform those inquiring to get a lawyer. If they didn't have counsel, the A G's office and private practice, paid by our taxes, what would they really say and do? They wouldn't do it because of the liability of responsibility, accountability, and financial burden. So, are you really going to be their boy with no Rights, no commitment to your Oath of Office, and not really commit to what you spoke of in the legislature, and do their bidding? Great stuff, isn't it.
Regards,
Dave Jenkins
3107 Tanglewood Way
Nanaimo, BC, V9T 5A5
October 22, 2009
Ministry of Public Safety and Solicitor General
Honourable Kash Heed
PO Box 9053 Stn Prov Govt
Victoria, BC, V8W 9J7
re: Driver's Medical Examination Form, from OSMV; postal date, 090730
re: my inquiry into the diabetic driver's policy and my human rights discrimination complaints #1954, 5699, and 5791.
re: letter of Oct 7, 2009
Dear Honourable Kash Heed,
Thank you for the reply of Oct 7, 2009.
However, whom ever wrote the letter for you is a liar. They have misinformed you about what has/is really going on concerning the “driver fitness policies” and the “settlement of your Previous Human Rights complaint relating to these issues”. This is the first time I have used that word since my initial inquiry of 2002, concerning the diabetic driver's policy.
You have not been involved in this inquiry but the civil servants that have been offer misleading information, instigated a policy that is not legal as it has never been legally justified, are hiding the horrific consequences of their actions, broke the settlement agreement and not renewed it, and will do anything, besides killing me, to defend their actions. And now they have you, a very real naïve bystander, signing a document that is a lie, in order to protect themselves. It intentionally misleads the reader as to what the illegal policy is, the state of the discrimination complaints, and your responsibility, as Solicitor General, as the overriding manager of the OSMV and its actions, to investigate its behaviour; not to tell a voter to go get a lawyer when it is very clear there are so many things wrong. It seems you are the scapegoat or fall guy this time for the corrupt civil servants involved.
The lie is to protect themselves. The lie is to protect you? The lie is to protect the civil servants involved in the illegal diabetic driver's policy? The lie is to protect those civil servants involved in the discriminatory policy? The lie is to protect you from the responsibility of the horrific consequences of the policy. The lie is to protect the OSMV from the horrific consequences of the policy? The lie is so that civil servants are not held accountable for their actions?
(The Gomery commission wrote that civil servants need to be held accountable for their actions. This means the all those civil servants that are responsible for this illegal policy, the consequences, and those that are supporting it. This means you, the Publics Representative, the person voted into position, the position of status, trust, power, and prestige must challenged them. You do not work for them. They work for you. They work for me. You work for me, the public. You do not need to accept their disinformation, misinformation, or lies or their lack of accountability. The previous S G's did not challenge them or demand they obey the law or we would not be here now. They must have refused to deal with this corruption and that is why you are now involved, you have inherited corruption. Not something anyone wants to inherit. They left deviant behaviour unchallenged and that is why you are now being lied to. Corruption begets corruption.
Welcome to the world of diabetes. Welcome to the world of the minority you are not part of. People who have their Human Rights and Legal Rights removed, taken away, unnoticed, unobserved, un-noted, overlooked, unheeded, neglected, ignored, and disregarded due to color or religion or disposition. The forfeiture of Human Rights and Law due to some civil servants point of “view”. Now that is arrogance, discrimination, and corruption.
All due to the Deputy's “view” that diabetic drivers or diabetics are a liability to society. Just like discriminatory belief or “view” that women cannot do things men can do. Like the racist, discriminatory belief or “view” that people of color cannot do what people of non-color can do. Absolute corruption.
Solicitor General, it is your job to defend Human Rights and Legal Rights. No matter if outside gov't or within. You swore an Oath to defend against crime and deviant behaviour and whatever else is in that Oath to keep our society a place of Human Rights and Law? It is your job to attack those of bias, prejudice, hate, ignorance, fear and loathing, disgust, and contempt. The very things racism, prejudice, discrimination, lies are based upon.
You do it for me so that when some bright bigot tries to take your Human Rights and Law away support is not there for them. Support to send letters out to you that say, Get a lawyer if you do not like us taking your Human Rights and Legal Rights away.)
Solicitor General, if you really wrote the letter then you have been misinformed, misled, lied to, and manipulated for those that are protecting themselves and now using you as their scapegoat, the fall guy. Just as the Deputy Superintendent of Motor Vehicles blamed some underling for breaching the settlement agreement you have just written about, she used a fall guy, the scapegoat, to protect herself. The charade concerning the breached settlement agreement also has a fall guy, the scapegoat; used as a ruse to not renew the settlement agreement. The HRT is used as the fall guy or scapegoat in concern with the theft of the scientific documents, used to try and justify the policy and its horrific consequences. And now you are being used as the fall guy, the scapegoat, for the illegal policy, and the wrongs associated with this policy.
Solicitor General, I do not know how long you have been in office but it definitely takes a few years to understand the office. Therefore, you rely upon unknown people to give you the truth, the correct facts, not their belief or “view” of things. You manage the OSMV. The Deputy Superintendent bases the anti-diabetic policy upon some civil servants “view” of the world. Not good enough. Not good enough for the Superintendent as he has been in position for three or four years now. There are laws to follow, the MVA binds them and the OSMV has not fulfilled the demands of the Law. As a matter of fact the OSMV has changed the wording of the Motor Vehicle Act to get its way against the diabetic. To justify the horrific consequences of the policy. This is your business to stand up to. To stand up to those that break the law.
If I don't fulfill the diabetic Driver's Medical Examination that is being demanded of me right now you will charge me with breaking the law and cancel my license. So, you will attack me for not complying with an illegal policy, then you need to attack the law breakers in your own office.
Solicitor General, you don't tell me to get a lawyer, you attack those that are manipulating you and forcing people to comply with this demand, done under false pretense. There is intent to mislead the public, the diabetic driver, and now you about the diabetic as a liability. The OSMV has never fulfilled the demands of the MVA, therefore the demand is wrong and illegal. The OSMV is lying to you if they inform you that the policy has been justified with any documents. It's based upon bias, prejudice, hate, ignorance, fear and loathing, disgust, and contempt, all giving a “view” that it is ok to break the law and discriminate. That is why your staff have lied to you about me challenging the illegal policy.
You should inform them that they will need a lawyer to explain themselves as you are about to inform the RCMP about what is really happening as it should have been done through the previous S Gs. That you are hiring a third party to investigate the policy. That you are stopping the policy against diabetics because it has not been proved to be able to do anything except denigrate the diabetic. That you are not going to be their scapegoat or fall guy. A lawyer not funded by your and my taxes will be needed as they have used the Attorney General's resources which also hired private counsel to deny and protect the wrong of discrimination and an illegal policy and that is not going to happen anymore.
Did they inform you the policy against diabetic has never been legally justified? What does that say about the people that are supposed to be informing you about what is going on? What does that say about all the other medical conditions the OSMV supposedly manages? What does this say about how grand the consequences of the illegal policy?
*
Solicitor General, have these people informed you that the Deputy wrote that the driver fitness policy against diabetic drivers is based upon the “view” that it is ok to do? Are these the same people that have just lied to you?
Have they informed you that the OSMV changed the wording of Motor Vehicle Act to mislead the public into believing the policy is legal and bona fide? My complaint is based upon the real wording of the MVA.
Have they informed you that the policy has not fulfilled the demands of the Charter, another tool used against me, but no documents offered to prove the OSMV has fulfilled the demand?
Have they informed you that the demands of the Human Rights Code have not been fulfilled?
Have they informed you that gov't instructed me, condescendingly, to lodge a complaint to the HRT. Are these the same people that have written the Oct 7 letter and just told me to get a lawyer, through your position? They use you so they do not have to take responsibility or be held accountable for their actions, defer that to your letterhead and position?
Have they told you that the OSMV broke the settlement agreement and played a charade to cover it up? To make it seem the settlement agreement is still valid? The October 7 letter informs readers the settlement agreement is valid, it is not. The OSMV broken the settlement agreement and that is why I lodged a second HR complaint, #5791, concerning the diabetic drivers policy as the OSMV has had ample time, years, to justify the policy, and they have not.
Solicitor General, those that have informed you that the settlement agreement is still valid are liars. Your staff are corrupt, not you, not me.
Have they told you that they stole science and presented it, in #5791, to justify the policy? That they lied about it when I caught them?
Have they informed you of the real consequences of the policy? Other than turning me into a pariah, the Other. Have they informed you that the OSMV informed me they know about the harm to the medical system. And they have continued with the policy knowing the harm and knowing the policy is illegal. Have they told you the consequences are part of or the reason for the overcrowding of the Emergency Facilities and shortage of General Practitioners as maybe, just maybe, 18 or 20 % of G Ps are filling out forms for the OSMV and all its conditions that it supposedly manages.
Imagine the killing and maiming, the slaughter, due to some civil servant “view” of the diabetic.
It is interesting that none of the above have been mentioned in the letter written for you. The letter is contrived to mislead the reader, as if all is well and the OSMV is working in Good faith to fulfill their commitment to an ongoing settlement agreement. No such thing. If there was any Good Faith or Good Will the settlement agreement would have been renewed. It hasn't been. If there was any Good Faith or Good Will the policy would have been put on hold until real, bona fide research could prove a need. Science to prove the intervention would not be worse than the problem. Nothing has been done to prove Good or Good Will by the OSMV, so the inference that they are Good and the policy offers Good is just more of the misleading information and lies about the policy. Your office manages the OSMV. Your office has the obligation to fulfill the settlement agreement, to renew it, as I did not break it. You need to demand the civil servants involved start being responsible and accountable concerning this illegal policy, the discrimination, the horrific consequences, and misleading information concerning the policy and my endeavours to correct a social policy gone amuck.
Solicitor General, whether you like this or not you need to take these people to task as it is clear they cannot manage themselves as they have gone too far and do not know how to stop.
What are you going to do when in their “view” it is ok to do this to you, your wife, your kids, your parents?
*
Solicitor General, two weeks ago you were on TV, a local NEWS program, speaking in the Legislature, denying people were going to loose their Rights. Sorry, but I missed who you were defending. Who you were attacking for misleading or lying to the public.
My point is, your language, tone, and body language seemed truthful and done with passion. So, if you will fight for the Rights of whom ever you were supporting why not me?
Why have you just told me to get a lawyer?
Why has your staff lied to you about my HR Complaint (s) and what they are really doing?
Solicitor General, you belong to a minority, just as I do. You are with the 'Visible Minority Classification'.
I am also Classified.
Classified as a liability to society, based upon some civil servants “view” of the world. I am then labeled and given a number. Forced to undergo a medical examination that cannot do what it is alleged to be able to do. The Classification has never been proved to offer any Good. The consequences of the policy against me are horrific. I will be tracked for the rest of my life. Laws never fulfilled and laws changed by civil servants to keep me in my place.
Diabetes is like color, it never goes away, however it is invisible until labeled or spoken about.
These facts present me as if I am their Nigger, or Jew Boy, or Hindu or what is the new derogatory term used to create fear and loathing and the forfeiture of Human Rights and Law to the Other, a Muslim or Muslim bitch.
Solicitor General, I think it fair to say your parents and mine, and you and me, and our society fought against bias, bigotry, prejudice and discrimination to change the accepted social policy of their time, since World War 2.
Today, People of Color and Religion are not designated a place to live in within the Lower Mainland or BC or Canada. The work our parents did for you and me and country always needs to be fought. Discrimination, prejudice, hate, fear and loathing, disgust, contempt is never eradicated but only slips away to resurface again. It is within this complaint.
You know what I am talking about. You see it in their eyes and language.
So, lets review. You can live where you like. You can practice any religion. Your kids, if you have any, can go to school where they like. Your wife, if you have a wife, can work, be educated, travel, etc etc; her choice. You have become a politician and been given/earned a Ministry in a Democratic Society (from the Charter). You were voted in by folks like me. You did not change color after you were voted in. You stand up in the Legislature, a very public Place, and demand Rights. Human Rights. Legal Rights are part of this. That you will defend Human Rights.
Then why not me when it comes to this illegal policy?
What is being done to me is bigger than anything in your Ministry. It is the biggest thing you as a person will be confronted with. It is bigger than anything you as a politician will be involved in. It's about gov't corruption and it involves a lot of people. It involves how people see and treat people.
If the Premier can talk about his Driving Under the Influence, take the responsibility for his actions, and change why not the civil servants doing this to me. Why are they allowed to jeopardize your political career? Why are they allowed to falsely charge me with being a liability to society. Why are they allowed to make destructive demands upon the medical system leading to the unexpected and unexplained deaths and maiming of those naïve bystanders using the Emerge and blame those consequences upon the diabetic, falsely leading the public to believe the diabetic needs monitoring at all cost.
If you don't think this will happen to you and your family, why not? It is really happening to me now. They will just say this about you, your wife, and your kids. They will say in our “view” it is ok to do. Or they will offer research from the 1850s that said non-whites had smaller brains than whites, therefore the rules of Law and Human Rights, and pain to not apply to non-whites. Or some Apartheid research from the old South Africa or the old USA or Canada's treatment of First Nations people.
And your staff or you told me to get a lawyer. You need to stand up to what you believe in and said in the Legislature. Those that will hate you for your actions supporting me, already hate you, so you don't need to worry about their hate and prejudice. If you loose you position in gov't you can at least report to your Constituency and the Public about why you were fired, demoted, or sent to the back benches. If this happens, you will really be able to stand up and say your political career was indeed short but you changed the world.
*
Solicitor General you work for me, the public, its guys and gals like me that voted you in. It is not your job to support corrupt policy or social policy that has never been legally justified, which the Charter, the HR Code, and the MVA demands, whether these people like this or not.
There are laws to follow and it is not up to me to hire “BC Human Rights Clinic, the UBC Law Students Legal Advice Program, or the University of Victoria Law Centre.” in order for me to enjoy my Human Rights or Legal Rights. The gov't has a duty to guarantee them. Then one may challenge if the action is discriminatory. You need to enforce the law in the first place as it has not been fulfilled.
It is your job as you represent the public to confront those that are involved even if it is your staff and a policy before your time. You can't go the Attorney General's office as that office is protecting those involved and the illegal policy. I believe it was responsible for changing the wording of the MVA to falsely justify the policy. It also contrived the charade to misinform about the breached settlement agreement. It hired the private firm that presented the stolen research. In other words the A G's office presented stolen documents to justify the policy. It was wrong to do so. They lied about their actions. I caught them at it. The lie was to change a legal document concerning the stolen research. A lie to change a legal document? That was wrong too. I caught them at that also. If these people do not know it is wrong to do such things, then why are they in positions where they continue to do wrong? Elected officials and bona fide civil servants have had seven years to stand up to them as that is how long I have been inquiring.
Solicitor General, the policy is illegal and that is why you need to investigate. To hire a third party, the RCMP, to investigate corruption, as I did with the BC HRT. To investigate why the OSMV, your office, has implemented a social policy that has not been legally justified. Discrimination comes from that action also. To investigate the breached settlement agreement and the charade. To investigate the stolen research. To investigate the lie about the scope of the complaint and how that was used to change a legal document in order to decrease the number of stolen scientific research items presented, to decrease the harm, as a form of damage control. To investigate the new DME Form that has the MVA wording changed again, done in order to deceive the reader and all concerned and force the diabetic to conform under the threat of loosing one's license, which is all done through false pretenses that the policy is legal.
Don't let these people turn you into their boy as they would like to do. The October 7 letter is their first step in concern with this illegal policy and breach of Human Rights and Legal Rights and of having you be their boy, disregarding your Human Rights and Legal Rights, and the Oath of Office to obey the Law and do no wrong and support no wrong.
Why else would they tell you to not respond and tell him to get a lawyer. Those in the wrong always inform those inquiring to get a lawyer. If they didn't have counsel, the A G's office and private practice, paid by our taxes, what would they really say and do? They wouldn't do it because of the liability of responsibility, accountability, and financial burden. So, are you really going to be their boy with no Rights, no commitment to your Oath of Office, and not really commit to what you spoke of in the legislature, and do their bidding? Great stuff, isn't it.
Regards,
Dave Jenkins
posted by type 2 at
1:59 PM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home