21 pp, Nov 19, 2010, Brian Sinclair death after 34 hrs in Emerge

The following letter was written due to the reporting of Brian Sinclair's death in a Winnipeg Emerge facility. He died after waiting 34hrs for care. winnipeg.ctv.ca Oct 15, 2010
His death exemplifies the corruption I have found myself within concerning the illegal diabetic driver's policy. His death is a Homicide, maybe Genocide, definetely Democide. That the BC gov't is covering up and hiding from.
There is a criminal charge against a number of organizations involved, health care as well as gov't. There are also two other criminal cases mentioned in the articles about Sinclair. After this letter maybe there will be another Investigation into the past 10 years of Emerge Overcrowding and unexpected and unexplainted deaths. Ten yrs as I became diabetic in 1999 and was forced to comply to gov't policy then, which one would expect to be legal and not need to challenge but the policy counter what I was reading about type 2 and low blood sugar and the medical examination did not then and does not today predict, prevent, and manage diabetes.
Reader, all that I write about is to examined in the Winnipeg Investigation, Inquiry, and Inquest.
Hopefully, the letter directs the Chief of Police and counsel for the complainants to the scope of the killings, the Genocide, or Democide; a large number of the population killed by gov't policy, and a known illegal policy at that.
Don't forget the Emerge Overcrowding comes from illegal demands such as the diabetic policy that I have found myself fighting. The gov't has written it knows of the consequences, in other words, the killing of clients in Emerge is an acceptable consequence of the illegal policy. How do they justify that?
Hopefully, the letter directs the RCMP to this Homicide, Democide, as the diabetic policy is Nation wide and if illegal in BC it will be illegal elsewhere.




Dave Jenkins
3107 Tanglewood Way
Nanaimo, BC, V9T 5A5


November 12, 2010




Ministry of Public Safety and Solicitor General and I believe the new Attorney General
Honourable Michael de Jong, Q. C.
PO Box 9053 Stn Prov Govt
Victoria, BC, V8W 9J7


Keith McCaskill
Chief of Police
C/O Winnipeg Police Service
PO Box 1680
Winnipeg, MB, R3C2Z7




Chief McCaskill, yes this letter is long, as are the other included “Reviews”, but the absolute corruption I have found myself within takes paper and ink to expose, just saying corruption, lies, theft, falsifying documents, illegal policy, Homicide, Democide, means nothing without the facts, connections, and the players. This is about the Sinclair Homicide, Democide and the things you do not know and need to know. As you are about to expose the killing for what it is you may want to think about your health again. The people that you are to read about know what they are doing and have buried it because of their positions in gov't and life and what they really are. Why? The above politician has buried it. What is he afraid of? If these people cared about Life, they would have stopped their behaviour eights years ago. They haven't. They care nothing for life. They are monsters.
So, do they care about your life now you are about to bring their killing public? Absolutely not. As a Police person you do acknowledge threats, political threats, endangerment to life, etc, to your health and position as Police officer and Chief, as just part of the job. This is why this is being sent to the Press, the Complainants' counsel, whether or not they want it or not, the RCMP, UN Dept of Prevention of Genocide, etc. Lots of witness's. Quiet ones, but still there.
After you have read the “Updated Consequences” ask yourself, “Why no one contacted has challenged the letter's revelations, even in my BC Human Rights Complaints?” That question/answer will explain the corruption. Why, because all of it is true and they are all afraid of the Truth, and now they are to be exposed for their corruption and what they are.
Ask yourself this about all the people and organizations, and especially the RCMP, that I have contacted, “Why don't they respond?” It's a good story for the Press. Why doesn't anyone even acknowledge the letters I've sent them? Why, because it really is Homicide and it comes from illegal gov't policy and it impacts all of Canada and the world. And Sinclair's death is just one of thousands since 2002, when I began my Inquiry into gov't policy.
And you don't think these monsters are not going to try and influence you. Maybe they'll get a supposedly drunk driver to run you over, me too. There is something desperately wrong with these people to carry on as they have, knowing the consequences of their behaviour and illegal policies, and now as rats in a cage going to be exposed for the corruption they are, you just don't know what one of them will do. Or as a gang, what they will do.





Those Contacted and Why, go to page 15.
November 12, 2010


Ministry of Public Safety and Solicitor General and I believe the new Attorney General
Honourable Michael de Jong, Q. C.
PO Box 9053 Stn Prov Govt
Victoria, BC, V8W 9J7


re: letter of June 16, 2010 concerning illegal diabetic drivers' policy and corruption, theft, lies, breach of Oath of Office, fraudulent use of taxes, killing, maiming, endangerment to life, Genocide, Democide, etc, etc.


Dear Honourable Michael de Jong,

As you will have read by now my inquiry into the illegal diabetic drivers' policy and my Human Rights Discrimination complaint have not been resolved, as the liars in your office had informed the last Solicitor General.

You've had four months to respond to me and haven't. Why? You and I haven't done anything wrong. Its the staff and policy you have inherited that are the problems and you owe these corrupt senior civil servants nothing. Why defend them? They've broken Laws and their Oath of Office and the consequence of their behaviour kills and endangers lives.
I've been inquiring since 2002, that is eight years now, which begs the question, “How many people have been killed, maimed, and had their lives endangered, such as happened to me May 2009?”
Endangered because the Office of the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles, your office, diverts taxes to pay for the illegal Drivers' Medical Examination that should be used for bona fide medical demands that are legal and do Good.
Again, the DME cannot do what it is alleged to be able to do and that is predict, prevent, and manage hypoglycemia, low blood sugar; the very thing that I am Classified for, Labeled, Given a Number, Forced to undergo a perverted medical examination, and will be Tracked the rest of my life, and had my Charter, HR Code, and MVA Rights taken away.
Does this remind you of a Fascist and Nazis policy and behaviour?
All because your Superintendent and Deputy Superintendent of Motor Vehicles and some other unknown corrupt civil servants think that in their “view” it is ok to do. They don't have a “view” they have Laws and their Oath of Office to follow and they have chosen not to, therefore put themselves outside our Democratic society and are corrupt monsters.
Once again, this is an illegal demand upon the Universal Health Care System, which causes horrific consequences, as doctors are forced to comply with the DME under threat of penalty from your corrupt, criminal civil servants . It needlessly debits doctors from the pool of doctors available whom offer legal bona fide health care.
Secondly, it is a false and fraudulent demand upon the UHCS, as it diverts taxes from the Ministry of Health and its bona fide needs, such as my spinal surgery, which I needed to pay for, $10 000, so that I did not loose the control of my lower bowels and maybe, in time, loose my legs as I have diabetes. Becoming a amputee, in a wheel-chair, stuck in an Overcrowded Emerge with catheter infections and dying, as happen to Brian Sinclair in Winnipeg. Your office owes me $10 000 and those civil servants doing this should be in jail, and the Sinclair Investigation will make this public.
*

One again, these people swore an Oath of Office to obey the Law, Do Not Kill, Maim, Endanger Lives, Steal, Lie, Mislead, Misinform, Break the Trust, etc, etc. They have done all of these things. And they know they have.
And they still have a job?
And they have not been charged for breach of Oath of Office? Breaking the Trust and the Legal Trust of Affidavits?
And they have not been charged with Homicide; reckless endangerment to human life causing death and endangerment to life and indifference to human life causing death and harm?
Has the diabetic policy been canceled? No, because the killers just sent me another DME to comply with.
Have all the other 100 or so medical conditions the OSMV states it monitors been canceled due to the fact that they also are based upon some civil servants “view” of life even if a driver, like me, visit the doctor at a rate of 20 - 1.
You have also sworn an Oath of Office and Code of Ethics as a lawyer. Where does this put you?
You can fire all of them just like the two involved in the B C Rail crime, that broke the Trust of Oath of Office. If you don't stand up to them you have broken your Trust also. You are going to do this for those involved in this illegal policy and the killing, maiming, endangerment to life, theft, lies, misinformation, misleading information, etc, etc?
*
Again, the policy is still illegal, as it was not legalized in Human Rights Complaint #5791 where your staff presented stolen scientific documents in an effort to legally justify the policy where I caught them stealing. That's automatic dismissal and jail time. Charges for each of the 185 stolen research documents under Copyright theft, Intellectual Property Rights theft, and Intent of Use wrongs, breach of Trust, Oath of Office etc. All three of these protective instruments are used by the Office of the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles and they pretend they don't need to fulfill their demands? They are liars.
Have you fired your so called academic researcher, Dobbs, for stealing research in order to justify the policy and her new job? Is she still employed trying to justify the other medical conditions that are supposed to be managed by your Deputy Superintendent, Howie, and her superior, the Superintendent? What is she going to steal and corrupt this time to make those policies supposedly legal in an effort to justify the consequences? How do you justify Homicide?
*

Why haven't you charged the BC HRT with corruption for not acknowledging the stolen research, the lie concerning this, which was used to fraudulently change legal documents, the scope of the complaint? For not acknowledging the consequences of the policy, the “Updated Consequences”, for burying my complaint, #5791, through changing the scope of my discrimination complaint without my involvement? For not acknowledging the policy is illegal, as the stolen science that was presented was then withdrawn, which means the OSMV withdrew it defense of its illegal policy? For not acknowledging that the policy is still illegal and has always been illegal?
This was all done for your Superintendent and Deputy and other corrupt civil servants and gov't at large, as the consequences are so horrific? The BC HRT absolutely failed in their Mission, Vision, Aim, Goal, or Mandate to protect Human Rights at all cost, not defend illegal gov't policy and its corrupt civil servants in order to hide the Genocide and Democide.
Why do they still have jobs? Why aren't you in court to protect the sovereignty of the Human Rights Tribunal?
*

Brian Sinclair's Death in an Overcrowded Emerge after a 34 hour wait.
The Public Investigation by the Winnipeg Police and an Inquiry and Inquest is about to begin. Chief McCaskill and all involved need to know what you are not doing, what other politicians have not done, and what the corrupt civil servants in B C are doing, as the diabetic policy will be the same in Manitoba and the killing will be proportionate to their population.
A/S General you need to go to Manitoba and explain why the illegal policy is allowed to run in BC and why the killing, maiming, endangerment to life, theft of taxes to run the policy, theft of research, lies, Breach of Oath of Office, Breach of Trust, etc, etc is acceptable, as I imagine the 14 Respondents would like to know B C politicians and senior civil servants believe that others that run illegal policies and practice Democide is ok to do. I'm sure counsel for the Respondents would appreciate a lawyer, a Q. C. Lawyer, a Solicitor General, an Attorney General to support them in their defense of gov't corruption, Homicide, (death through indifference to Human Life, reckless endangerment to Human life causing death and other labels for wrongful death), fraud, falsifying legal documents, endangerment to my life, etc, etc.

My point is, the death of Brian Sinclair is a Working Example of what I have been writing about since 2002. Diabetes policy is in all provinces and if your office needed to steal research and not offer research from the other provinces to justify the policy and its horrific consequences, which can never be done, then it is clear all other diabetic policy is illegal and the killing in those provinces is also wrong. Your staff have known all of this since 2002. What's this make them?
What's this make you if you refuse to respond now you know about the illegal policy, the consequences, the fraudulent use of taxes, Breach of Oath of Office, Breach of Trust, theft of scientific documents, breach of Affidavits, etc?
Again, A/G General you owe these civil servants nothing. You owe B C everything. You owe Canada everything.
And if you are to run to be the new leader of the Liberal Party it may be prudent, proactive, and fruitful to expose the corrupt civil servants, clean the corruption from the old dynasty, to cancel illegal gov't policy, etc, etc, as a tool to demonstrate your commitment to a just A/S General's Office because the Trust has been broken, as seen through those two civil servants involved in the Rail corruption, which the A G supported then for 7 yrs and $18 000 000; they didn't kill anyone did they. Its not that the civil servants doing this to me haven't earned firing and charges. It's also time all those that are peripherally involved are contacted.
A/S General, you've had long enough to make a decision. You need to make the decision if you are corrupt or not. You make the decision to protect a few corrupt colleagues or stand up for B C, Canada, our Democracy, the Trust of the public, Law, Human Rights, and Right to Life.
The Premier has left you with this mess. It's a lie if you think these colleagues and civil servants support you. They'll despise you, as you will not stand up to them. So, you may as well expose the whole corruption now.
*

Keith McCaskill
Chief of Police
C/O Winnipeg Police Service
PO Box 1680
Winnipeg, MB, R3C 2Z7

Dear Chief McCaskill,

You get a copy because you are involved in Corruption already and don't know it.
My British Columbia Human Rights Tribunal Discrimination Complaint, #1954, changed government policy. Chief McCaskill, imagine the questions I asked of government for them to change policy and and then bury my complaint after I accepted the out of court Settlement Agreement. The “Updated Consequences” letter is enclosed.
Chief, you know how hard it is to change policy. Have you ever changed policy with only a few questions?

As you will read the promises of the gov't have not been kept and their illegal policy is still killing, maiming, and endangering lives; Sinclair is the Public working example. They have buried it, and the new A/S General has inherited the corruption but he should have fired those involved already and at least charged them with breach of Oath of Office, theft of protected research, lying, running an illegal policy, breach of Trust, Endangerment to Life, falsifying legal documents, using taxes to pay for an illegal policy and its demands, which is fraud; all things easily proved without going to court case. The charges of Homicide and Democide may take time, as it is the gov't that will be charged as well as the civil servants, and it has deep financial pockets to fight this; it has been stonewalling me for eight years now and all the while killing. This is why I have contacted the UN Department of Prevention of Genocide and Human Rights Watch, the RCMP, universities, the Press, and the public, as hopefully they are not or cannot be manipulated by our governments and civil servants. However, the Press certainly does not want to investigate “The why of Emerge Overcrowding”. Why? They interview the survivors of the dead and the Emerge doctors involved. Why not the “why” of why so many people are in Emerge, Emerge doctors say 50% of Emerge clients should not be there, they should be seeing a G P? Ask the Press that question.

You are about to have an Inquiry and Inquest into the death of Brian Sinclair and Olive Kirkness and others because those involved are in denial of what they are doing, therefore hiding any responsibility and accountability, therefore not making changes, which would have resolved the Emerge deaths, maiming, and endangerment to life that you will be investigating, and maybe Sinclair and others would be alive today. Illegal policy or any policy does not have the Right to kill people. Canceling the policy would also have resolved other harms you will be confronting, such as; the Emerge Overcrowding, long wait-times for surgery, long wait-times to visit a G P, dysfunctional ambulatory care deliveries, Emerge Admissions to hospital rather than through G P or Specialists, etc.
You are having the Inquiry and Inquest in the hope of making policy change to stop such things. Chief, think of the mind set of those people doing this knowing all along they run an illegal policy that kills, maims, and endangers lives.
You will be dealing with Monsters as I am here.
One death is an accident.
The second death the policy should have been put on hold.
The third is Homicide.
The fourth is what? The fourth is Serial Killer or Mass Murder, as there is more than one keeping the policy going and hiding the consequences.
The fifth is Mass Murder.
The sixth is what?
The tenth is Democide, large numbers of people killed due to gov't policy.
And these civil servants know the policy is illegal and killing. What does that make them?
Now you know what I have become involved in and have been fighting for eight years. This is not acceptable anywhere in the World, little lone Canada.
How many unexpected and unexplained deaths due to Overcrowding in your Emerge since I began my inquiry into this in 2002? We document deaths in Emerge and hospitals. Get your Chief Coroner to give you the facts, or will they fight you?
Chief McCaskill, you are going to have a lot of people tell you what not to ask and where not to go. Have people talked to you about retirement, your wife and kids?
Those involved in this Genocide, Democide, know of what they are doing, as Government, civil servants, doctors, and scientists all demand one to evaluate the consequences of any action and intervention, and they are in denial of the consequences of their actions and many are in denial of their refusal to stand up to corrupt gov't and corrupt civil servants. The policy I confronted is still running, is still illegal, and still killing, maiming, and endangering lives in B C. Why? This is why the gov't stole research in an effort to justify the policy. This is why the gov't has refused to put forward a Policy Paper, as legally demanded since Confederation in 1982 or before, as promised in 2006, on disabled drivers, as the total demand upon the health care system will be realized with its consequences, with the killing becoming public and the absolute public acknowledgment that the policy or policies are not needed. And you wonder why the new A/S General, a Q. C. lawyer has not responded to my letter, canceled the policy, not fired anyone, especially the A G Supervising lawyer. What would that open up? Yes, the new A/S General has buried this. I wonder if he has been talked to or threatened?
*
Why read this stuff

Chief, if you don't read this material or have it presented to the Investigation, Inquiry and Inquest you will not understand the depth of the corruption and how it will impact your Inquest and Inquiry. You'll make decisions not knowing the things you need to know, therefore wrong conclusion. You can read the included “Updated Consequences” now, as it will explain why the gov't and civil servants are stonewalling and stealing research, allowing you to understand the other letters enclosed with a better understanding of the why of the Emerge killings, cover-up, and the HRT cover-up.
Secondly, the letters enclosed are a summation of what the gov't has done to me over the past eight years. You are only beginning. Counsel for the Respondents have been at this for how many years? You have approximately 275 pages to read, all in story form as this, and you will be up to date and know how corrupt the whole policy and consequences are, and you will know the players to be. You'll be on an even playing field with those you are to investigate and evaluate, you won't be playing catch-up. You'll know their lies as they tell them.

You will be confronted by senior civil servants that are thieves and liars and in denial of the killing their policy or policies are doing. You have corrupt civil servants, as does Ontario with the civil servants that stole medical records about Vets and passed them around to harm the Vets and they still have jobs. Why? They are Traitors as they attacked our Troops. They should be charged with Treason. And the two criminal civil servants in B C mentioned below. You'll have the opportunity to expose people that have broken their Trust, white collar criminals, and make the world a better place.
By reading these letters you will also learn what to ask of all the groups involved, because the gov't and its civil servants and certain medical organizations will not inform you what they are really doing;
ie, the diabetic drivers' policy is illegal, it is not needed, does no good, and the forced medical examination cannot to what it is alleged to be able to do, etc. The Supervising lawyer for the B C Attorney General's Office presented stolen research documents in my Human Rights Discrimination complaint to justify the policy; done for the Office of the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles, which is under the umbrella of the Solicitor General's Office. The academic researcher that presented the stolen research, 185 documents, presented them under the legal status of an Affidavit, (how many laws did that break?). Presented by a Human Rights lawyer from Heenan Blaikie, a former employee of the BC HRT. The B C Human Rights Tribunal has not acknowledge the policy is illegal, that the research presented by gov't was stolen. The B C HRT changed the scope of my complaint, which they did not have the legal right to do. Why do you think they did all this? Done to bury the killing, the Democide, any accountability and responsibility. How does one defend conscious Homicide?

My point is, “Would you have challenged these people and their Position of Status, Trust, Power, and Prestige and their Affidavits?” You would not challenge them because of their Position and the Affidavits and you would have been wrong to do so. Now you know you cannot trust any of them presenting to you, whether in B C or Manitoba, because whether or not they somehow present the policy or policies as legal, they are not allowed consciously run a policy that kills, maims, or endanger lives. They only think diabetic drivers have more driver-mishaps than non-diabetic drivers but it is their actions that kill, maim, and endanger lives, as it did with me. I'm fortunate that we had funds to afford private surgery and not become disabled as Sinclair was. I'm still here and demanding my Rights and they're still here killing and covering it up. *****

Speaking of corruption, Homicide, Genocide, and now Democide it has come to my attention the case of Brian Sinclair, who “died after waiting 34 hours to have a catheter replaced in the Health Sciences Centre ER in September 2008.” (online CTV Winnipeg, Fri, Oct. 15, 2010)(winnipeg.ctv.ca) or type in (brian sinclair, “Police investigation launched into death of Brian Sinclair at hospital ER.”

Chief McCaskill, as mentioned in the other letters enclosed I needed spinal surgery and needed to buy my MRI and spinal surgery, which cost just over $10 000. I asked for reimbursement as the policy is illegal, therefore the shuffle of taxes to pay for the demands of the policy is illegal, therefore my life was endangered as taxes are not used for bona fide demands upon the Universal Health Care System and I needed to act to save myself from the corrupt civil servants and their policy.
Their behaviour is called “endangerment to life” or “reckless endangerment to human life” causing death and harm and I was not going to become disabled for these monsters that are the A/S Generals staff and others. They can kill someone else with their corrupt “view” of life. They are the monsters not the diabetic or disabled person or the Public using the UHCS.
Don't you wonder how many people the consequences of gov't policy has killed in Emerge, harmed those waiting for surgery, or had their lives shortened due to the loose of control of their bowels, as would have happened to me if I didn't get surgery immediately? I wasn't about to crawl or be delivered to Emerge and ask for spinal surgery? The damage would have been done by then. And the ambulatory service may not have been able to deliver me to an Overcrowded Emerge anyway.
Would you wait that long knowing that the risk of damage to your spine was increasing? Knowing the killing going on in Emerge? Knowing the problem of surgery funding was there because taxes are being diverted to pay for the illegal policy I am fighting? Knowing the risk of dependency to the opiates you take for pain was increasing with every day of use? Let the corrupt monsters in gov't kill me or cripple me and become what Sinclair became? Amputee, no control of bowels, catheter dependent, wheel chaired, and still diabetic with all this on top? Or are you going to do what I did and buy private surgery from a neurosurgeon that can plan the surgery?
Does this review of my health remind you of Brian Sinclair?
Is Sinclair worth standing up for?
The corrupt civil servants and health care people may loose their jobs and some go to jail but they won't loose their life over this will they. We can't say that for Sinclair and Kirkness, and others and people maimed due to the Overcrowding.
I was not going to loose control of my lower bowels and end up with catheters for my urine and stool all because the corrupt civil servants in the A/S General's Office divert taxes to pay for their illegal policy and their phoney illegal medical examination that has not been proved as needed, little lone proved to be able to do anything, except denigrate the diabetic as it sets the diabetic up as a liability that needs medical control even if not proved as needed. I was not going to experience what Sinclair had become and died because of.
Chief, as diabetic drivers and doctors are forced to comply with this corrupt policy and medical examination in all provinces the same is happening in Manitoba. It is only reasonable that the death of Sinclair is a consequence of the illegal policies in Manitoba; illegal here they are illegal there. Manitoba's Overcrowding, as mentioned in the Press, is a consequence of gov't policy, as it is here. Overcrowding and unexpected and unexplained deaths in Manitoba and yet no one has made the connection to the “Why of Emerge Overcrowding”, long wait-times for surgery, long wait-times to see a GP, etc, etc by gov't policy; it is probably being buried as the B C gov't has done. As the Solicitor General's staff have done. As the Attorney General's staff have done. As the BC Human Rights Tribunal has done. Will all the so called smart guys and gals in Manitoba we are supposed to believe they are not conscious of this? Do you really believe they had not investigated the “Why”? They investigate every consequence of their actions as you do, as they have trained themselves to do.
It was just a matter of time before someone else somewhere stood up and like the Emerge doctors scream, “I've had enough and can't stand this anymore and we need to investigate these deaths and the “why” of Overcrowding” and the “Why it has not been investigated”. Do you really believe it has not been investigated since I made it public over the past eight years? It doesn't matter what the monsters say in defense they always need to investigate the consequences of their actions, their policy, their surgery etc, so the questions is, “Why didn't they”. They did but buried it knowing the cost of taking gov't to court, knowing the harm, and knowing diabetics and the disabled are marginalized and not listened to.
Chief McCaskill, now add all this on top of an amputee, catheter dependent, and wheel chaired First Nations person, (and what other conditions did he have). He didn't have a chance.
*

Why hasn't the A/S General responded to my request of refund of the $10 000 I needed to pay for spinal surgery? If his staff would not have been so corrupt I would not have needed to buy my surgery, neither would so many others that have visited Dr. Day's Cambie Surgery and other private medical centers and private MRI centers, such as Comox MRI that offer immediate health care, which would also need to be refunded? Last year I damaged my right knee getting back into shape after the spinal problems. The doctor and I waited a year and very little improvement, therefore a MRI was asked for, it is an eighteen month wait. I went back to Comox MRI and had the MRI and an evaluation within a week; cost $875. It is a six month wait to see a knee surgeon. We are thinking of private health care again as our taxes are still being used for illegal demands upon the UHCS by these corrupt murderous civil servants. How many waiting for knee surgery will become addicted to opiates waiting for surgery and become your “addiction problems” in Manitoba? Do you ever ask why these white and blue collar workers become addicted, as they seemed to be not the stereotype addict? You know Oxycodone is problematic with legal and illegal use. For people like me with spinal and knee problems is can be a problem and it is hidden because of corrupt civil servant and their policies. Just another consequence of this illegal policy.
My point is, a technician that gave me my MRI came from the Lower Mainland as the Universal Health Care System MRI facility does not operate for the needed forty hours of work, not that there isn't the demand for forty hours of MRI work. The extra work on Vancouver Island gives/gave her/him full time employment and more. We all need to question the corruption surrounding things like this where funds are not available for sanctioned UHCS needs only because some corrupt civil servants run an illegal policy based upon their perverted sense of life and their lust for killing, power, and playing God. The diverted tax should be used for legal, bona fide, medical necessary demands , such as MRIs and surgery.
Yes, the neurosurgeon that operated on me, the Chief of Surgery at Lions Gate Hospital is not funded to operate on Fridays, so he and maybe his team work for Cambie Surgery to saves lives such as mine.

My point is, as this policy is part of the car industry one must come to understand that people like Brian Sinclair and others are just Roadkill to these people. If we really were Human to these people we would not be invisible and our Rights would be acknowledged and the laws followed. It is quite clear to all concerned we do not have the same Rights and Freedoms.
*

Chief, we need to look at All diabetics, 400 000, 9% of society, to understand the gravity of the policy's consequences, not just through me. All the disabled drivers, numbers not given by the OSMV, about around 100 medical conditions, for the consequences, not just me, which will document the tens of millions of taxes fraudulently used, where if used for legal medical use, problems you are going to be confronting would not be there. This allows us to realize the taxes that should have been available for legal use by the Min of Health, therefore decreasing Emerge Overcrowding and deaths, long surgery wait-times, etc, etc. Now add the debit of Doctors that are taken out of circulation to complete phoney DME.
Chief, you then need to add All other demands the gov't makes of the UHCS, as they blame the Public for too many demands and always conveniently forget to mention their demands; legal and illegal.
If the policy had been canceled in 2002 when I began my inquiry this would have not only decreased number of private health care needs, but allowed G Ps to do their work and see clients within a reasonable time, which would have decreased the number of clients going to Emerge for help, as Emerge doctors state 50% of Emerge clients should not be there and Sinclair may have been alive today. Saving one life by canceling an illegal policy is worth it isn't it?
If the extra Emerge clients should not be there then where should they be? They are not Martians or Americans. Why are they there? They are there because like you and me we are not going to wait 5-7 days to see a G P who is filling out forced medical examinations and forms that have not been proven to be needed, cannot do what they are alleged to be able to do, have not proven to offer any Good, and I see the G P at a rate of 20-1 for diabetic care anyways.
If the Overcrowding was not there Sinclair would have been very noticeable, and the false claim that he was not seen would certainly not be acceptable. It's not acceptable anyway, 34 hours, in these days of security panic from 9/11, and a brown man at that. Bullshit. How many people have gone to Emerge in a year, which means half should not be there.

Chief, all funds put out to private health care should be reimbursed, at least since Aug 2006, when my Human Rights Discrimination Complaint changed who pays for the illegal Drivers' Medical Examination, as at that time taxes were then shuffled to pay for the illegal demand upon the UHCS, which should have been used for people such as myself or for clinics that could service needs, such as Sinclair needed. Before that time private surgery should also be reimbursed as the gov't was pushing their illegal policies under threats and created problems that impact each aspect of medical care, as they are all part of a whole; they can't screw up one aspect without impacting the rest of the whole.
Now add the other 100 or so medical conditions the OSMV says it monitors. Now add all the other demands the gov't makes upon the medical system and ask if they are legal and offer Good and you will come to understand the depth of the corruption and why they will not reimburse me. How many millions will need to be reimbursed and this will be investigated as to why this is happening. Just another consequence of the policy, another cover-up.

My point is, the above makes it easy to follow as tax dollars are used to pay for the DME and the paper trail will be documented, explaining the lack of funds for Emerge, surgery, the demands upon the G P, which leads to the Overcrowding in Emerge you are about to confront. This reimbursement is also not acknowledged as the sum would be in the ten of millions and the gov't will do anything to hide this. It exemplifies their liability, therefore corruption. 1 000s of deaths,
1 000 000s of dollars, killing, gov't corruption, Charter, HR Code, and MVA Rights consciously broken. Am I about to get run over or my family harmed? What about your family and yourself.
Are you beginning to understand the corruption you are involved in and will be exposing?
*

The BC gov't has just taken Dr. Day's Cambie Surgeries to court, www.courts.gov.ca Court of Appeal For British Columbia. Cambie Surgeries Corp v. British Columbia (Medical Services Commission), 2010 BCCA 396.
My point is, it doesn't matter what side of the argument you are on, access to private health care or not, did the Courts know the gov't and Medical Services Commission run illegal policies that make false demands upon the medical system that have horrific consequences upon health care with people like me, who are then forced to buy health care? Or if not you may loose control of your lower bowels, become an amputee, wheel chair bound, and die in Emerge? In this illegal policy and phoney medical examination the MSC now pays for the DME, which is then reimbursed the debit by the taxes given the Solicitor General's Office. An interesting shuffle of taxes to pay for an illegal policy. The scum that did this should be jail.
Chief, as with the stolen research would you have confronted this shuffle? Of course not, with the MSC paying the bill the doctor submits for the DME, it falsely marries the Policy (policies) to the MSC giving it a contrived public legitimacy. But the policy is illegal and not a medical necessity, which means it cannot be funded by the MSC.
Another interesting shuffle to hide what is really going on, isn't it. The DME is too blatant to be seen as legal, therefore the public reimbursement to mislead about what is really going on. Just another charade you need to know of.
Has this charade been buried by B C's gov't and the MSC in their efforts to restrict private health care? To cover up the need for private health care, a need that the Gov't itself has created? To cover up the consequences, such as the Overcrowding in Emerge? To contrive a hands-off affair, so that Overcrowding and deaths are at arms length from gov't, its civil servants, and the MSC, with the Overcrowding blamed on the Public and Emerge doctors as the Scapegoat for deaths and maiming?
Think about “How doctors are used as the Scapegoat for the gov't killing.” What kind of people are you going to be investigating? Monsters? Monsters that just love contriving to mislead and use people like you believing they are doing Good.
Chief McCaskill, if private health care agencies need to have their books examined for money uses, shouldn't the gov't have its books examined? Done so the Judge can make a full evaluation of the matter at hand? To know of the corruption of gov't concerning this policy and its consequences, which private health care solutions are a very bona fide need?
As you are investigating this unexplained death shouldn't you know what is really happening?
Doesn't the Solicitor/Attorney General have a legal obligation to report this to the Courts?
Isn't there a legal obligation to report all this to past decisions and future court cases involving the gov't assault upon private health care centers? Unsolved deaths and Homicide has no timeline, it is always open to review.
Again, the gov't criminal activity causes the demand for private health care and I certainly was not going to become crippled or an invalid due to corrupt civil servants and their perverted sense of values and lack of obligation to obey Canada's laws. Did they offer to have their books evaluated, of course not. Did they tell the judge how they shuffle money around? Of course not. So, they mislead a Judge? These people are gangsters, as well as monsters.
*

The Attorney and Solicitor General's Office failure and the RCMP's failure to respond to this corruption is the same behaviour, or charade, as we have just witnessed by those two civil servants and the Attorney General's Office that has just played out with a seven year stonewall or what ever you label it, in B C, beginning December 2003. A charade to hide from taking any responsibility or accountability from passing on private information about the sale of the B C Railway to those interested buyers. They broke the Law. They broke their Oath of Office. They broke the Trust they have been freely given by our 'Democratic Society' (from Section One of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms) and the corrupt civil servants in the Attorney General's Office protected them.
Don't forget, the Supervising lawyer for the Attorney General's Office played a charade concerning the breached Settlement Agreement for my BC HRT Discrimination Complaint, #1954. In the charade she misleads everyone into believing the Policy is legal, it was not and is not today and that the breach has been resolved, it never was. Hunt is also responsible for presenting stolen research and the lie concerning that criminal act, BC HRT Discrimination Complaint, #5791. She is responsible for presenting the lie about not understanding the scope of the complaint, which saw a change in the scope; so a lie was used to change a legal document; its called falsifying a legal document. She broke the Trust or legal being of the Affidavit. This is what you are going to experience McCaskill. Absolute corruption.
Late October 2010 saw the Premier state the two civil servants were criminals. Why didn't he step in earlier? They were his civil servants. It went on for seven years. What does he think the people involved in this illegal policy, its horrific consequences, fraudulent use of taxes, killing, and breach of Oath of Office are? I wrote his office about this years ago and they did not have the professionalism, the guts, the backbone, the courage, the grit to write back; of course not then they be held responsible for running an illegal policy that kills, maims, endangerment of life, that illegal gov't policy endangers our health care system, etc. The Premier will be retiring soon, in a couple of months, and there will be a lack of will to hold him accountable, as happened with his drunk driving charge in Hawaii. He was forgiven and I'm still Categorized, Labeled, Forced to comply with a Medical Examination that cannot do what it is alleged to be able to do, Tracked for the rest of my life, had my Human Rights, BC HR Code Rights, and Rights under the MVA taken away. I'm not the monster here, the civil servants and doctors involved in this are. The so called nice people in society, who really are thieves, liars, and killers.
The new A/S General is playing the same game, as those two civil servants and their civil servant colleagues did for them. Deny, procrastinate, stonewall, break settlement agreements, lie, and people will be retired or be voted out of office, therefore accountability forgotten. Hunt is playing the same game and you will experience the same. I'm still here, eight years latter and the cowardice concerning this is just astounding. What are you going to be confronted with, as you are inquiring about a dead First Nations person? They haven't maimed me yet, wheel chaired me, or killed me yet, so I'll keep writing and maybe I'll contact a couple of Canadians that are not afraid of these killers. Maybe some UN people. You?
That criminal act by those two was only a Breach of Trust, accepting a benefit, and breach of Oath of Office and they got two years in house arrest, but it was only these acts wasn't it. The real criminal act came from the AG Office for stonewalling for seven years. The real criminal act with my case is also within the A G Office, as the policy is illegal and they have known this since my initial inquiry of 2002 and it maims and kills people. It's killing and maiming people today.
This is an illegal policy, theft, lies, mail fraud, tax fraud, breach of settlement agreement, perverting the legal meaning and use of an Affidavit, fraudulent use of taxes for a perverted medical examination, falsifying legal documents, killing, maiming, endangerment of life, misinformation, misleading information, breach of Oath of Office, breach of Trust, etc, etc, so why didn't the AG, 2005-2009, Wally Opal, a lawyer and retired judge, not address my complaint. Why did he bury my complaint against his supervising lawyer, Hunt?
Chief McCaskill, the cost for gov't protection for these two was $18 000 000 and does not include the RCMP costs; that's $2 571 428 a year or $1 285 714 per year per criminal. What's going to be available to the monsters in your province?

My point is, the gov't knew they had breached their Oath etc and they knew the penalties for such a thing, so why the delay? Absolute corruption.
I've been at this since 2002 and the Attorney General's Office has been involved since the beginning and then hired Heenan Blaikie. What is the cost for Heenan Blaikie? Heenan Blaikie is 700 lawyers riding around on the laurels of Trudeau and Chretien and other high liberals involved in bringing a Constitution, a Charter of Rights and Freedoms to Canada? And I don't get Rights. I don't think the above low level civil servant's behaviour killed anyone, maimed anyone, or endangered lives. Nothing compared to what I have found myself immersed within and you are now within.
As the BC HRT buried my complaint until all medical conditions are written about in the so called, revised Driver's Guide, actually a Policy Paper, as nothing was ever given to me, it begs the question is Heenan Blaikie still on contract? Writing away and contriving a defense and giving advice for the corrupt civil servants and their so called Driver's Guide, if it is ever publicly published after I caught the government's academic researcher and Heenan Blaikie's lawyer presenting stolen research and then lying about it? What is this cost? What is the cost for the academic researcher, a thief and liar?

My point is, what funding has been given counsel representing the complainants in your case? It will be nothing compared to what will be given the gov't and its agencies. Without equal funding it is discrimination and if a bona fide Inquiry is to happen then all sides need to be funded equally especially when this case is about how Canada should be, equal for all, inclusion, and equal Rights and opportunities.
So, how is Heenan Blaikie or another law firm going to justify the policy if modern science proves there is no difference in driver mishaps between type 2s and non-diabetic drivers? They can't; present stolen research again? By magic?
How will any law firm justify the consequences? How will those Manitoban civil servants and gov't justify the consequences of their policies that corrupt the UHCS?
How many tax dollars are being diverted to pay the gov't legal expenses to hide an illegal policy and its Democide; not only with private counsel but with counsel coming from the A Gs Office?
How many dollars are to be used in the Hague to defend those charged with Genocide or Democide?
And one wonders why the Supervising lawyer for the Attorney General's Office presented stolen research documents and then lied about this when confronted. Its all on paper for review.
And counsel for the Complainants in your inquiry only get two hundred thousand dollars or so. Nothing compared what civil servants received in B C. And this Inquiry is about how Canada should be, the underfunding is not acceptable for such a decision about breaches of Rights and Democide, as those doing the killing have known from the beginning they have inexhaustible funds available.
Yes, gov't policy and civil servants caused this killing, Genocide; it really is problematic isn't it. Democide, large numbers of the public killed by gov't policy. And this diabetic policy is illegal to begin with, not a mistake, and they carried on knowing this. Again, how many other gov't policies are illegal or kill, therefore should not be running?
*

By the way, much of the stolen research that was presented by the corrupt academic researcher had nothing to do with diabetes; it was just Padding to Intimidate the reader into believing something through Volume and coming from an Academic Researcher, under the power of an Affidavit, is relevant and a powerful counter argument to me.

My point is, remember this for the Science that will be presented to you or has been presented to you, as to its legitimacy and its merit, value, and meaning to the matter at hand. Did they also pad the presentation in your original inquiry? Was the research legal or stolen? My Response to the stolen research and researcher should be read by you and all concerned so that the monsters in your investigation will know that you are up to speed and will not be manipulated by their corruption of Science, Padding, and their Position of Status, Trust, Power, and Prestige.
*

Chief McCaskill, there is always 'severity' of the action isn't there. So what is the severity when the policy is illegal and the civil servants know this, they know of the harm caused, and they continue with the policy in spite of this? Democide is realized when one reads my “Updated Consequences” and the harm is understood through the 'numbers of diabetics, disabled, and other gov't demands that are not acknowledged.' The “Updated Consequences” are realized through sums, subtraction, multiplication, and division, not through statistics and formulas that only a few can really understand. The severity drives the cover-up, the theft, the lies, the breach of Affidavits, etc, etc. Death through indifference to Human Life. Reckless endangerment causing death. The highest of severity is death, for many deaths it's Democide.
*

Our society does not allow people to engage in illegal behaviour? That's why we invented the Charter, the Human Rights Code, the Motor Vehicle Act, Law, and a Social Contract of how we should behave. That is why there is the Motor Vehicle Act, so that not only the public has direction but the senior civil servants have direction, which in turn protects them from attacks. The civil servants involved in this policy have not followed the law, in fact they had their lawyer paraphrase the MVA statutes to mislead the public that they have Carte Blanche to do what ever they want. In fact, the new DME Form, due to my HRT Discrimination Complaint, lies about the policy and the right of the Superintendent concerning demands upon the driver; this is falsifying a legal document. The MVA was crafted to keep these corrupt civil servants from doing what they have done. Its fraud and more for a lawyer to do this, an A G lawyer to do this.
These people swore and Oath of Office to obey the Law, do not kill, do not maim, do not endanger life, do not steal, do not lie, do not mislead, do not misinform, do not etc etc.
So, why hasn't the A/S General's Office canceled the policy, fired these civil servants, charged these civil servants with multiple charges, and why hasn't the A/S General's Office reported this to the RCMP? I know it hasn't happened because the RCMP have not contacted me.

My point is, what is going to happen to you when you begin asking questions about gov't policy and its impact on health care, Emerge deaths, maiming, endangerment to life? About Charter Rights, Human Rights, MVA Rights, and the Social Contract of Trust and how we should live.
*

Oct 17-23, B Cs A/S General was on TV stating the cost of the protection, the legal fees, for the two civil servants, and gov't, guilty of breaking their Oath of Office, breach of Trust, etc could have been stopped two years ago. So, why wasn't it? Who didn't stop it? Why didn't they stop it? This A/S General is a lawyer, an experienced politician, privy to internal private meetings with other privileged politicians and the Premier. Why didn't he stop it as lawyers are never allowed to take their Lawyer Hat off. They are on duty 24/7. Why hasn't he stopped this illegal policy?
It wasn't stopped because those that could have stopped it are also civil servants and protecting what they may need themselves? That those involved in not stopping the funding are as corrupt as those that I have found myself involved with?
Wouldn't gov't use the Attorney General's Office to protect these civil servants, who would then hire private counsel for those two, as the OSMV did to fight my Discrimination complaint and accountability?
That's where the billing the A/S General talks about comes from. Wouldn't Hunt, the supervising lawyer for the AG Office, have done this? The same Hunt that has been involved in my inquiry since 2002-2004? The same Hunt that broke her Oath of Office when she attacked me and not the civil servants running an illegal policy, that they know kills people. The same Hunt that played the charade concerning the breached settlement agreement coming from my first discrimination complaint? The same Hunt that misleads that the policy is legal? The same Hunt that did not renew the breached settlement agreement but only misleads all to believe she did? The same Hunt that presented the stolen research in my complaint? The same Hunt that presented the lie about not knowing the scope of my complaint, therefore the inordinate number of research articles presented? All the while not acknowledging they were stolen. The same Hunt that presented the lie about not knowing the scope of my discrimination complaint in order to change the HRT scope of complaint? This is falsifying legal documents. Hunt hired Heenan Blaikie, who put forward a Human Rights lawyer, who is a former HRT employee, who presented the stolen documents in defense of the policy. Did someone owe someone here?
Hunt is the supervising lawyer for the A G office, so the buck stops with her. And she still has a gov't job?
Is this what the A/S General means when he states that the funding could have been stopped but wasn't, two years ago? Two years ago is when I caught Hunt presenting stolen research under an Affidavit, etc, etc, in HRT Complaint #5791.
So, is this what he means, the funding for those two was not canceled because those in the A G Office knew they may need protection shortly? None of what has/is happening to me should be attached to a lawyer, to a gov't lawyer, to the Supervising lawyer in the A G Office. There should not be any inclination of breach of Trust to her. She shouldn't have a gov't job. She should be up on charges. Which begs the question, “Why hasn't the RCMP responded to me about this?”

Has the A/S General complained to the Law Society about his colleagues behaviour concerning all this? Considering he is Hunt's manager or supervisor. I imagine he will also find an excuse for not turning the Heenan Blaikie lawyer in, to be a whistle blower. I have but it will have greater urgency and impact due to his position as Attorney/Solicitor General. I wonder if the Law Society would stand up for him and his complaint, as a whistle blower against his colleagues? As a whistle blower for Law in Canada, the Democratic Government, and Democratic Society that he represents, which affords lawyers the protected position of third party in legal issues? I wonder if he will stand up for Canada or grovel to these two high prices lawyers and their corruption?

My point is, is the newly appointed A/S General saying Hunt could have stopped the funding but didn't, as she knows she will need it if I found some way to expose her actions?

Secondly, concerning why the funding was not canceled two years ago. These two men are of Indian heritage, the A G at that time, two years ago, is of Indian Heritage, (not First Nation).

My point is, is today's A/S General also saying that due to this cultural similarity there was cultural bias concerning the continuation of funding for these two men?

Third, don't forget, when I inquired about Hunt's charade played out to cover up the breached settlement agreement I made inquiries to the A G's Office about this. When it did not acknowledge my questions about this I complained to the A G, as he delegated some senior civil servant to investigate my inquiry concerning his supervising lawyer. This senior civil servant did not respond to my questions. I asked the A G if this person was literate, could he read the lengthy letter and understand the need for length, as poising questions without background, connections, and players would be confusing. The A G told the person to investigate my inquiry. The senior civil servant again refused to respond to my questions. I again complained. The A G at that time told me to get a lawyer, as they considered the matter closed. He buried my complaint about Hunt and her refusing to acknowledge the policy was illegal and the breach settlement agreement, etc.
From above, the costs for the two criminals' legal bills is what I would have needed to take gov't to task, the gov't knows people do not have $1 285 714 per year for counsel when it comes to challenging gov't corruption.
Maybe if someone stood up to Hunt then, we would not be where we are now, running an illegal policy that kills.

My point is, is the newly appointed A/S General saying Hunt could have stopped the funding but didn't, as she knows she will need it if I found some way to expose her actions?

Why hasn't the gov't fired the ten, thirty, or more civil servants and let them personally and financially defend themselves? Let them experience the cost of breaking the law and their Oath of Office; both financially and employment wise. Let them try and get Legal Aid after gov't cut funding or Community Legal Assistance Society, as I was able to do for the first discrimination complaint but due to financial limitations CLAS has not been able to help me since.
Why hasn't Hunt, the Supervising lawyer for the A G's Office, charged those civil servants running the illegal policy? Those shuffling taxes to pay for the illegal policy, etc? Because she is corrupt and a leading figure in this Democide.

My point is, Chief McCaskill, who's really managing the funding for your Inquiry and Inquest and why doesn't the public have the same financial help the gov't has? The indifference is not acceptable if you are to run an equitable investigation.
*

My point is, why is it that all the so called smart guys and gals, those high I Q's, intellectuals, and want to be intellectuals, doctors, lawyers, senior civil servants, hospital and health authority administrators, politicians, and private influences that are involved in this did not work through the consequences of the policy to know the harm, such as I do in the “Updated Consequences”? It is part of life to investigate any action and to realize the consequence. Are we saying doctors operate or intervene without researching for consequences? That gov't does not look at the consequences of dams, mining, logging, of garbage dumps, or sewage, medications, operations, etc, etc?
Hold it. Hold it. They do and did and the documents they sent me allow us to understand this. They just buried it knowing the cost of taking gov't to court and how to prolong or stonewall, as they have done with me, as they did with the two lower civil servants just found guilty of breach of Trust etc in B C, mentioned above. Hopefully Manitoba First Nations people are able to expose this gov't corruption, Genocide, and Democide, as gov't has not been willing to acknowledge the death of Sinclair. Chief, its been two years or more hasn't it?

My point is, do you really believe the civil servants in Manitoba will be honest to the Winnipeg police? To the Judge or whom ever is the arbitrator of the Investigation, Inquiry? To the coroner or whom ever, for the Inquest? That the government agency or Core Services, that review gov't policy, for legality, for bona fide (ness) and worth and value, such as happens in BC with this policy, will tell the truth or have documents to prove that gov't demands upon society and the UHCS are legal and bona fide or are their policies just based upon someone's “view” of life, such as is done in B C?
Do you think all the other organizations listed, the Respondents, as being involved in the death Brian Sinclair and others will tell the truth, where they haven't in my inquiry in B C?
Chief, hopefully you are coming to understand the depth of corruption that surrounds the diabetic driver's policy, about illegal gov't policy, about gov't demands upon the UHCS that they do not acknowledge, all leading to problems the gov't cannot afford to disclose. It happens here and it is happening in Manitoba already, the two year wait to get to where you are now, the lack of equitable funding for those challenging the gov't and its agencies, and the non-disclosure of the consequences of gov't policy upon the UHCS and the public.
Contact the RCMP and ask how far they are into the investigation concerning all this. They haven't given me a complaint number so I cannot help you with this. This begs the question; “Why hasn't the RCMP given me a case number in order to give you a reference”? I have a complaint number with the Law Society, BC HRT, letters to gov't are dated and invoiced, Telus, Shaw, so why not with the RCMP.
The complaint to the RCMP about the stolen research was returned to me in pieces with the note, 'We don't do such things'. No name of who did this. No response to my complaint about who did this. The person who did this should have been fired. Do you give complaint numbers? Are you going to acknowledge my contact with you. This is why I need to Register-mail my letters. This is why I contact the public and the Press.
This is why I contacted the UN Dept of Prevention of Genocide etc, before I knew what your civil servants and others had done to Sinclair, Kirkness, and those maimed. Welcome to Democide in Canada.
*

Capital Punishment

My point is, Attorney/Solicitor General, Chief McCaskill, and all Readers, Canada has a Policy of Non-Capital Punishment. It was a conscious choice Canadians made. Gov't policy is not allowed to Consciously Kill people. These civil servants know their policy kills people and they have continued on with it.
A/S General, why is it that your Office runs an illegal Policy that has as a Consequence, the killing of people in Emerge and those waiting for surgery? Add those that become addicted to medications because they need to wait for surgery because taxes have been diverted to pay for the illegal driver policy and phoney medical examination.
Why haven't the RCMP laid charges against those civil servants running this policy? They made a Conscious decision to carry on with the policy for at least the past eight years, since I began my inquiry. They run a policy that kills and pretend that they are enough steps away that they are not doing anything. Then why the depth of perversion and corruption to hide what they are doing?
Sinclair didn't kill any one and yet he was put to death. His death is an absolute consequence of an illegal gov't policy. His death is not some kind of correlation or ten steps away from the original action. Gov't runs an illegal policy that makes illegal demands upon doctors and the public, which increases wait-times to see a G P, so people go to Emerge, Overcrowd it and the consequences express. And the gov't knows this. They have made a Conscious decision to keep running the policy knowing it harms, knowing it kills, which means they are Executing people. Just Roadkill.
And you wonder why all this has been done to me.
Why people, gov't, the Press, consulates, those involved, heads of religious orders and their organization do not even acknowledge contact. Why? Because they have world Ideas, the Big Idea of what I have only recently come to understand about the policy's consequences.
This really is Democide and in the Democracy of Canada. The people doing this are authoritarians, Fascists, and Nazis and care nothing for the Laws of Canada or Canada. I do not need to live their idea of Canada, their lies about what Canada is. I do not need to live their lie of Canada and the world should know this.
*

War and corrupt civil servants
Remembrance Day
My dad, Dave, spent a couple of years in England getting bombed and training for the European Mainland War, June 6, 1944. He spend a year there and more at War on Continental Europe. His brother, Walter, went to Hong Kong, it fell, and he survived the Concentration Camps, Slave Labour, and Torture (Real water-boarding where a hose was inserted into his anus and then he was filled with water, then rolled over, and a plank placed on his belly to be rocked back and forth to force the water out. And other tortures and starvation.) Walter went over at 210 pounds, a farm boy from Manitoba, and came back 86 pounds. They fought for Democracy and Rights. As our troops are now. And we are supposed to forget this?
We are not allowed to attack corrupt civil servants in Canada that care nothing for Charter Rights, Human Rights, and Right to Life. Bullshit. They should stand up in court and explain themselves.
We are supposed to forget this? When the monsters express themselves in Canada we are supposed to forget this and not attack them? The people doing this to me are nothing less than out of control authoritarians, Fascists, and Nazis scum. Those not standing up to these monsters are cowards and there a lot them.
And we are supposed to think I do not have the Right to write and question gov't, its corrupt lawyers, and cowardly politicians? Bullshit.
Chief, you are involved in corruption and Genocide and the breakdown or collapse of Canada's vision of Human Rights and Law, Fairness, and Equality. The very things my dad and his brother fought for. I'll never stop writing. The day I stop writing is the day these murders and anti-democrats win.
Prime Minister Harper was on TV last night, Nov 8, 2010 supporting Israel for its Right to exist, the Right to Life, Human Rights, etc. And yet his civil servants attacked his own troops, the Vets, and he didn't even fire them. What about Sinclair's Rights? What about my Rights and Freedoms? He wants to be on the UN Security Counsel but he cannot even secure the Rights and Freedoms for Canadians and won't fight corruption in gov't itself. And what about the sexual predator and murderer that was the Commander of the largest military base in Canada. And what about changing Canada from a Blue Hat UN Peace Keeper to become Warriors? Aren't these and more the real reasons of why we were not voted to be on the UN SC? The PM does think these failures impacted our opportunity to be on the UN SC? And now he blames Arabs and Moslems. I'm fighting perverts and murders too and politicians are in denial of this also.
*

We send people to War because corrupt civil servants and their ignorance, greed, decadence, and their failure to keep Canada as United Nations Peace Keepers; they aren't smart enough to keep us out of War. Fifty years we've been Peace Keepers on this world and this new Conservative regime has taken Canada from that to Warriors in Afghanistan. And when the military men and women come home from fighting in these corrupt countries and their corrupt civil service they find themselves fighting the same at home, corrupt civil servants that mean them harm. Fighting those civil servants that sent them to War. These Canadian civil servants stole the Vets personal medical information to use against them, to wage Psychological War against the Vets, when they complained about the gov't treatment and lack of health care from their War experiences.
These civil servants doing this to the Vets care nothing for Canada either. They tried to bury their abuse of the health care system and health care for the Vets, the surviving warriors. They tried to bury their corruption surrounding the benefits for the dead. And they still have jobs?
These Vets are still Canada's military as they may be asked to return to Afghanistan as some warriors have had two and three tours of Afghanistan. Which means they are active troops who have been attacked by their own country's citizens, no different than the Omar Khadr case. These civil servants have attacked the warriors in order to harm them, a conscious act to consciously harm. These civil servants are Traitors. They need to be charged with Treason. They need to be charged with treason , as they acted within the Scope of War, whether the corrupt civil servants and politicians have defined Afghanistan War as War or not.
There is no difference between what they did and those using communications in World War 2 and the Korean War to harm people. I believe some of those using mass communications of the day for Harm were killed by gov't after these Wars. Our gov't does not participate in Capital Punishment, so these criminals should be in jail for life, as they attacked Canada and its people.
These civil servants also broke the Law and their Oath of Office by not following the law, by stealing, by hacking into private medical records, done to intentionally Harm the Vets by deliberately exposing private medical information to others in order to harm, to mislead the public about the Vets health, to squash the Vets presentations against gov't concerning lack of health care. Yes, this is all done by the idiots that have taken us from a respected Peace Keeping Nation to one of Warrior, and an ill prepared warrior due to the incompetence of the senior civil servants that steered us to this War who didn't prepare the troops.
And now the gov't has broken its commitment to get out of Afghanistan, Nov 7 or 8, 2010. Where do they think they will get the new warriors? That's right, from those already in the Reserves or recuperating from injury.
The civil servants doing this to me have also attacked me, mislead about me, abused the UHCS, and lied about events concerning me.
Have these monsters been fired? No. Because as with my situation the Politicians are also cowards.
And some in Canada wonder why we did not get a seat at the UN Security Council. Lots of excuses made but the switch from Peace Keeper to unprepared Warrior is the reason. Its a country in conflict and cannot even discipline its own civil servants of corruption and the UN does not need that as that is what it is trying to correct in the world.

My point is, Chief McCaskill, I have given three presentations of Corrupt senior civil servants, which begs the question, “Do you really believe the civil servants you will encounter will tell you the Truth about policy, what they know, and what they are actually doing?” Make it clear you will put them in jail if need be and see if they tell the truth then. See how many will become whistle blowers and turn on their corrupt co-workers or colleagues.
Wage a war on these monsters.

So, the question to be asked of the B C new A/S General, as you have buried this complaint, “As you are new to the job are you going to sick some degenerate civil servants after me as someone did with the Vets?” “Some monsters that care nothing for Canada, or Rights, or Laws?” You are surrounded by them. And now you do not have a leader, as the Premier resigned, another party in conflict, and a party in conflict does not make good decisions.
So, A/S General why not stand up for Democracy and Law and charge all those with the appropriate charges. At least cancel the murderous illegal policy.

And you wonder why I wrote the United Nations Department of Prevention of Genocide, the RCMP, Human Rights Watch, and Concordia University's Department of Genocide and whom ever else I can now write.
Chief McCaskill, you do not need to accept the corruption and the twisted perverted way of life these people say we need to live. They are the monsters, not Sinclair, Kirkness, diabetics, you, or me.
*


Regards,


Dave Jenkins




















New Players

Cc; Keith McCaskill, Chief of Police, C/O Winnipeg Police Service, PO Box 1680, Winnipeg, MB, Canada, R3C2Z7

This is also for you as you are new to this and you are playing catch-up and need a few more helpful facts.
Firstly, there are only Two user Groups of the Universal Health Care System, the Government and the Public. What has and is still happening to me will express itself in your Province as your gov't makes demands upon the UHCS also. Are the demands really legal or illegal, therefore corrupt such as B C's illegal diabetic drivers policy and its murderous consequences? If gov't demands are not legal, then they are not acknowledged, funded, or managed properly. The illegal demands have consequences, which cause the Overcrowding you will be trying to explain. Why has it come to me to expose the Overcrowding? Why not the hospitals, the UHCS managers, or the gov't as I have written them? None of these people explain why they fund an illegal policy and its demands upon the UHCS and yet I needed to buy my health care.

Second, Chief McCaskill, the corruption that has happened to me will present itself to you. You and your team need to read my official Human Rights Response to the corrupt academic researcher, as you will be confronted with Science and medicine and you need to understand how corrupt the stolen research is and how she has corrupted her Position as “academic researcher”. The hat or hats she uses to define herself, that Position of Status, Trust, Power, and Prestige she doesn't use once presenting. It's called the Triple Bs. Not bbb, bBb, or BbB, but the full BBB. Bullshit Baffles Brains. And that is what she tried to do. Always remember this when they present to you.

Third, if I hadn't the grit to confront the presentation in HRT Discrimination Complaint, #5791, from these corrupt lawyers and murderous senior civil servants, those in that Position of Status, Trust, Power, and Prestige you would have read that the Diabetic Drivers' Policy had been legally and scientifically justified by Human Rights complaint #5791, 2008. You don't read that. The policy is still illegal and the consequences still killing, maiming, and endangering peoples lives. You are all lied to and mislead that the policy is legal, therefore the consequences are supposed to be legal. Sinclair's death is legal and acceptable? Bullshit. Again, Chief, would you have questioned these people, their Positions of Trust, and their Affidavits?
The BC HRT buried my complaint by changing the scope of my complaint, which they had no legal right to do, therefore the policy and its killing continues; the RCMP is supposed to be investigating this. There should not be the smallest glint of harm, little lone death by gov't policy. Imagine the hate for the diabetic, disabled, and people of difference these people must have to continue on with this policy knowing it is illegal and the harm they create.
Welcome to absolute corruption. It's Mass Murder. It really is Democide. That is why they are hiding this.

Fourth, by the way, I complained to the Law Society about the behaviour of the lawyers involved; the phoney settlement agreement charade done in order to make people believe the settlement agreement had been amended. And all the while pretending as if the policy was legal to begin with and both lawyers knowing the policy was/is illegal. If the Law Society had stood up then maybe stolen research would not have been presented, maybe the A Gs Office and Supervising lawyer, would have attacked the illegal and corrupt civil servants as she is bound to do so through her Oath of Office, but Hunt didn't do this as she is corrupt.
I complained to the Law Society about this theft and lie and other things that are not acceptable behaviour for lawyers. This was May 16, 2009 and I just received a letter to say they are to begin , last week, reviewing my complaint about how I've and the public have been treated, etc. Do you really think the Law Society is going to take to task the Supervising lawyer for the A Gs Office or the other lawyer, a human rights lawyer coming from Heenan Blaikie, who is a past employee of the BC HRT?
If I didn't say anything then I couldn't expose another aspect of the corruption could I?
And never forget, if it wasn't for Democrats such as myself fighting for Charter Rights, Human Rights, Motor Vehicle Rights, Social Contract Rights lawyers would not have a government where they are freely given, afforded the Third Party Protection status that lawyers are freely given in a Democratic Society such as Canada. These lawyer have broken Laws and their Oath of Office, which takes them out of the Third Party Protection and should be charged with covering up illegal policy, Corruption etc, Mass Murder, and Democide. More about this in my Second Review.

Fifth, it's interesting to remember that a Manitoba First Nations person, politician, Elijah Harper, stopped the Meech Lake Accord, which had a focus of Special Rights and was not acceptable to Harper and the people he represented. And now we have Manitoba First Nations People again asking for their Rights as Humans, not just under our laws, their laws, or special Rights, but under the Right to Life, basic Human Rights, basic Right to Life. Interesting.
We really are experiencing the contrived social view of how non-First Nations view the First Nations person as a brown, amputee, wheel-chaired, person with no value, no worth, therefore not seen due to this social construct? How else does one not respond to someone in Emerge? They saw him but turned themselves off, as the monsters have done with me. The demands of the Charter, the BC HR Code, the MVA, and the Social Contract we live by have not been fulfilled in order for gov't to stick its ugly presence into my life, therefore my inquiry and complaint and their behaviour has worsened since my initial inquiry. I've been turned into the Other, someone who doesn't have availability to these instruments of equality and life in our Democratic Society. The Pariah has no Rights and is turned invisible, just as Sinclair was. Death due to indifference to Human Life.
*
As I have found myself immersed in this Democide we need to ask, “Is the killing of Brian Sinclair Genocide? Or a consequence of illegal gov't policy, therefore Democide? Don't forget, there are only two User Groups in our Universal Health Care System, the Government and the Public. And if Gov't does not Acknowledge their demands they are not Funded properly and Managed, therefore the Overcrowding. Chief, we always hear the gov't complain the Public is asking too much of the UHCS, but you never here the gov't acknowledging their demands, especially the illegal ones like the diabetic policy, and maybe all disabled drivers demands. You need to have the gov't list all the demands it makes upon the UHCS if you really are to make an equitable evaluation of the UHCS and its inadequacies. And never forget that I visit the G P 20 times for diabetes care for the 1 time I am forced to by the illegal policy and corrupt murdering civil servants. Why am I forced to do this medical exam if I'm already 20 times there? Does Hate, Power, Sex, Money, Perversions, Gangsterism, and Murder drive these civil servants and their lawyers? What drives Corruption Chief McCaskill?

My point is, what is really desperately Sick about this is that the gov't knows it is killing and the gov't uses Emerge doctors to apologize for the deaths. It is the doctors that explain to the survivors that the death was unexpected and unexplained other than Overcrowding. The Emerge doctors are the ones dealing with the Overcrowded Emerge, something the gov't has created itself. The doctors did not create the Overcrowding as my “Updated Consequences” presents.
To divert responsibility and accountability the corrupt civil servants have invented a Scapegoat for their perverted illegal policies. They know the doctors are blamed for the deaths and they turn their backs to it just as happened with Sinclair, my need for spinal surgery, my Charter Rights, Human Rights Rights, MVA Rights, and Social Contract Rights.
Chief, think about how slimy and slippery that defensive contrivance is.
The civil servants should be lined up in Emerge to explain to the Survivors that the killing is acceptable because they believe the disabled need medical monitoring and that belief overrides the occasional death in Emerge.
*

Previous Contacts

Superintendent Graham Burnside, Director, Federal Enforcement Branch, RCMP,1200 Vanier Parkway, Ottawa, ON,
K1A 0R2. You get a copy as I wrote you in May 2010 and earlier concerning this corruption and Democide. You and the RCMP have known about this for over a year now. It was only a matter of time before survivors of those killed in Emerge demanded an Inquiry. I asked B C for an Inquiry into this matter and not one person or politician responded to my request, as the killing is too great. Maybe the monsters in our society will finally be exposed and taken to task through the Sinclair Investigation, Inquiry and Inquest. Isn't it time the RCMP became public with this? Isn't it time you or whom ever you passed this complaint to contacted me? Every day people are dying, being maimed, having their lives endangered, being Discriminated against, and you know the policy is illegal and you haven't stopped it or put it on hold. Why?
One phone call from you to the A G Office or the S G Office would have stopped the policy, as it is illegal. Forget about the Homicide and Endangerment to Life, etc etc for the moment. Put it on Hold. You didn't do anything. From May 2010 to now is long enough for you to have contacted me, even it was under Private and Confidential. You didn't even do this. You have buried this. This may have saved Sinclair's life. You need to be in front of McCaskill's Investigation and explain why you didn't do anything, as the diabetic policy and disabled policies are nation wide.
You and the RCMP are not above the law in Canada. You are not allowed to turn your back on corruption, especially any glint of illegal policy, theft, lies, falsifying documents, breach of Affidavit, mail fraud, Homicide, etc. Especially, when I write it down, make the connections, and give names for you to follow. Eight years of writing, three Human Rights Discrimination Complaints, research, and making connections to the corruption between Ministries for you to follow to understand the progressive deviant, corrupt, criminal behaviour escalate as I catch them do one thing so they up the corruption to bury their criminality and Homicide. I've done the leg work and you and the RCMP have not responded because you know my complaint is Honest, True, Just, and offers Good. Values that Canada is supposed to run on and the monsters that are doing this to me and Canada cannot say the same. They are absolute corrupt perverted humans and you don't have the grit to stand up to them and their horror. Why? Because of the legal, social, and economic gov't liability?

How many deaths have occurred since you have known the policy is illegal? One death is too many. You haven't even had the guts to put the policy on hold until it could be investigated and Sinclair is dead, my life was endangered, the policy is still illegal and you know it.
Superintendent, I don't care if the senior RCMP are having a turf war to see who runs the RCMP, that's your problem. You keep doing business and complaints of illegal policy, theft, lies, illegal documents, falsifying documents, breach of Affidavits, mail fraud, death, etc are looked into and criminal conduct attacked, and in this case the policy put on hold, as then there would not be any glimmer of harm; maybe Sinclair would be alive and I wouldn't have needed to buy my spinal surgery. And don't believe the bullshit from the anti-diabetic lobby that the diabetic driver causes harm, as they haven't proved there is a difference in driver mishaps between type 2s and non-diabetics, because modern science proves there isn't. Their hate and ignorance runs them, maybe sexual gratification too. Put on hold as the Superintendent and Deputy Superintendent have not studied the policy to find Good and they know its illegal and kills. So, why run the policy anyway? Just the glimmer of harm should have seen the RCMP demand the policy be put on hold. The Attorney Generals should have done the same and yet they buried it and its Supervising lawyer attacked me and not the policy. Hiding or covering up corruption and Homicide is called what? And the RCMP hasn't done anything, why? Sinclair's counsel needs to know why?
Maybe the one that has the guts to cancel the policy or at least put it on hold until it is proved as needed and justify the consequences, Homicide is hard to justify, should get the job as Head of the RCMP. How is the RCMP to function if it cannot stand up to corrupt civil servants that run an illegal policy, steal, lie, kill, maim, and endanger lives.
*

I've just received a demand for another Drivers' Medical Examination and have 45 days to complete it or the thieves, liars and killers in the Office of the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles will take my license away. I do not know why I am being told to do this again, as I completed a Form last year as I have type 2 diabetes and a private driver's license, which means I only do it every five years. I use medication, Metformin and Insulin, but that does not change Classification of how often I am forced to comply with the phoney DME. I have always completed the DME under the threat of loosing my license, and then the need to fight gov't in court, which I cannot afford to do and these corrupt officials know this. So I complied and write. I survived my spinal problems and surgery and now must confront the killers and end up in court, as I am not going to be part of their Discrimination, illegal policy, etc, etc, endangerment to life, Homicide, and Democide anymore. They and you have had enough time to cancel the policy and you have not. You are the criminals not me.
This is the second time this has happened, it happened when I changed my license status from Commercial to Private, from a 2yr to 5yr DME cycle. I complained and the OSMV corrected the false threat, but did not acknowledge the policy is illegal, and of course not the consequences, and that the DME cannot do what it is alleged to be able to do. Nothing from them. No accountability. Just keep the killing going for their masturbatory pleasure.
This is harassment because I've had the audacity to challenge corrupt civil servants, stolen research, lies, their killing, and their illegal policy, corrupt lawyers, etc, etc? And society's fear of challenging them.

Why don't you contact these these thieves, liars, and murders and tell them to stop the policy, as it is illegal to begin with. And that you are investigating all concerned with this policy for corruption and Democide?
The DME Form states that if I have any questions I should contact the Driver's Fitness Unit. Hold it. Hold it. This is the dept of the Deputy Superintendent, Lisa Howie, who runs this illegal policy and knows of the harm, stole research, lied about it, and the academic researcher, Dobbs, that stole the science for Howie to justify the policy and its Harm.
Superintendent Graham Burnside, you phone them and tell them to get stuffed. Tell them I want you to charge them with harassment, as well as corruption and Democide.
Secondly, the gov't employees that send such letters out need to be informed that the policy is illegal etc, etc and the DME cannot do what it is alleged to be able to do. That they, as the Emerge doctors apologizing for Emerge deaths, are used as the Scapegoat, the gov't employees are being used for criminal activity by corrupt senior civil servants, doing their dirty work so the criminals are a hand away from the criminal activity, just another Scapegoat. Maybe they do not want to be involved in illegal policy and corruption and Homicide and Democide. Just maybe they want the Truth about what they are being forced to do, in order to keep their jobs. I don't think their job description includes, running an illegal policy, stealing, lying, being part of Homicide, Democide.
Lastly, as stated in other letters, and needs to be said again, the Driver's Medical Examination Form, MV2010D (06/08) and previous ones, is a false, an illegal document, its a lie, those that contrived it and use it have falsified a legal document; whom ever contrived it, they have, with purpose, lied, misinformed, and mislead the reader as to the meaning of the Motor Vehicle Act, Section 29; the section is paraphrased so as to drop the important words in order to mislead the reader. This is similar to the paraphrasing of three MVA statutes listed on the official Response form the OSMV gave to justify their policy in my first BC HRT Discrimination complaint. Lisa Lee, working for the A G Office in Vancouver, probably Hunt at that time, as Hunt signed her letter as Supervising counsel for Human Right in the A G Office. I always wondered who's Rights. The gov't and her rights to be corrupt? Lee paraphrased the statutes and when read the reader believes the SMV or Deputy SMV can do what they want. This is a lie. They are held accountable and must prove a need. Lisa Lee is not allowed to falsify documents and it had to be reviewed by Hunt before it went out to the HRT. There was enough room on the HRT Response Form to quote the actual statutes if they wanted or they were allowed to give copies of a document. There was no need for paraphrasing except to mislead.
I complained of this event and illegal form and I see they haven't taken any responsibility for their actions. Of course not, they are criminals and care nothing except for their own perversions.
As this is Homicide and Democide, deaths are never closed and past documents can be brought forward and those involved can also be charged. Lisa Lee needs to be brought back into this to explain how a lawyer can make mistakes on statutes, not just once but four three times for three statutes. Lawyers are not allowed to make one mistake concerning law or statutes and their paraphrase of such. Who told her to do this? Hunt? A lower level lawyer does not make these decisions and it is not believable that she made these changes without intent to mislead.
Section 29 states, “The superintendent may require a person ...” . Those that crafted the MVA included the “may” with purpose. To force the SMV or the Deputy SMV to give reason for their demands upon the public, so the monsters that are doing this today do not do this. It is done to protect the public from corrupt civil servants. So what do the monsters do, they change the wording on a legal form to mislead, misrepresent, to lie, to manipulate the public, into doing things that are not legally justified. These statutes are also crafted to protect civil servants from the anti-diabetic lobby and others that have personal demands and hate.
“May require” means something completely opposite than “require”, and they know this. “May require” means there are reasons for the demand and the SMV and the Deputy SMV must prove the demand is warranted, bona fide, and legally justified with documents for the public to read. “May require” means that the need has been proved and the SMV and the Deputy SMV has proof of need and that the intervention, the consequences of the intervention does no harm.
There is no proven need. So, the Deputy SMV stole research in an effort to justify the policy after years of running it and the SMV is just a guilty, as he knows from personal past correspondence with me about the breached settlement agreement the Deputy broke, and I complained about. At that time he should have fired Howie and stopped the diabetic policy, as it was illegal and harming, little lone Discriminatory. Their policy against the diabetic cannot be based upon their “view” of the world. They have proved their world to be of unaccountability, irresponsibility, corrupt, full of thieves, liars, those that breach their of Oath of Office, Homicidal monsters, and Democide. No one needs to live in their “view” of life.
The other statutes quoted were 25 and 92, and just as corrupted as 29. These people falsified legal documents and have done so again and use it to make me conform under threat of loss of license and court cases.
*

Superintendent Burnside, as I have recently become aware that the gov't killing is Democide and exposed it, I realized that the demand for the DME is illegal, not only through the illegal policy, etc, etc, but through the Form as it is also illegal, as the statute has been changed by the corrupt civil servants, the murders, thieves, liars, etc, which means they have contrived their own statute to force diabetics to comply under threat. What this means is they could not legally force the diabetic to comply with Statute 29, use 29 in the legal sense, as they have not fulfilled its demands, so they needed to change the wording to lie to everyone and hide their illegal policy and its Homicide etc. It is an illegal demand based upon a fictitious statute and threats. It is no wonder the criminals in gov't wanted to settle my human Rights Discrimination complaint out of court, as there would have been a record of the actions within the court for all to review and this may have come up for the counsel from CLAS to see. So, those involved in this changed who pays for the DME and offered a promise of changes to the diabetic policy. That was four years ago. They broke the settlement agreement and are liars about it and the promised changes. Well it worked for a two years and then I popped up again, 2008, with another HRT complaint so they stole research, I caught them, they lied about this, they withdrew the research canceling their defense of the policy, so the policy should have been found discriminatory by the HRT, but they didn't do this did they. The HRT covered this up. So, behind the scene gov't criminals needed to change the DME Form to explain the new billing process, form MV2010D (06/08). So, to continue their illegal policy, using the threat of loosing one's license, they contrived an illegal paraphrase of Statute 29, to use as their tool to lie, mislead, and misinform about the policy. Why not, Lisa Lee and other lawyers did it in 2006 in the official Response to my Complaint, #1954, and got away with it then. Don't forget, unexplained deaths and Homicide have no time-line for closure, Lee needs to talk about who told her to do what. The civil servants and lawyers that contrived the fictitious statute 29 are really nasty, slippery, slimy people aren't they. So, remember to charge these people with falsifying legal documents, covering up Homicide, abusing the disabled, etc, breaking their Oath of Office, breaking the Trust, etc, etc.

So, here we are four years later and I'm still asking Canada to cancel the illegal policy, prosecute these criminals, expose them for diabetics, the disabled, the survivors of Emerge deaths, the UHCS, for the doctors that are being manipulated, for Human Rights, Charter Rights, and MVA Rights, and Canada.

So, the phoney Form cannot force me to comply with it again. This means the Form I was just sent is illegal, as it makes false demands and threats based upon lies; done under the threat of non-compliance will see one loose their driving license and who has a million or so dollars to go to court, so people comply because the believe the policy is legal and the Form is legally bona fide?
So, I don't recognize the legality of the Form and I refuse to be part of the killing, maiming, etc, etc, endangerment to life, Genocide, and Democide any more. You civil servants are the criminals not me. I refuse to become a statistic, roadkill, to you civil servants. I have given you more than enough time to change and your behaviour has worsened, done with purpose, as you know the killing, as there should be no doubt the lawyers in the A G Office, Hunt and her cronies, will fund your defense and keep it going for years, as the Office did for those two other civil servant criminals mentioned above. It should be an interesting court case against me, driving without a license, canceled by an illegal policy that kills etc. And when I ask for Hunt as witness does that mean the A G lawyers cannot represent the A G office, the S G, the OSMV, and Heenan Blaikie, as they will all be involved in this illegal policy, mass murder, and Democide? Maybe as I'll be labeled a criminal, the court will give me funding for the court case.
Don't forget, corrupt civil servants have written the policy saves lives, in other words they wrote that diabetics are killers. So, I've already been labeled a killer by gov't and they have not retracted the lie, so being labeled as having a license infraction is nothing is it? Nothing in the world is worse that being labeled a killer by gov't, which was done to hide their killing. Another charade to have the public turn their heads against the disabled, the diabetic, while they hide their killing with years of false promises, stonewalling, false documents, theft, and lies.
As demonstrated in this letter and others these people are just insatiable in their need for corruption and maybe blood. It begs the questions;
“Are they sexually driven, is that their reward for the corruption of basic Human Rights and Laws?”
“Is there a sexual reward for knowing they are harming people and killing?”

Francis M. Deng, UN Secretary General's Special Advisor on the Prevention of Genocide, 760 United Nations Plaza, New York, NY, USA, 10017. You get this as it is a very good example of what I have found myself embroiled within. You decide if these First Nations deaths are Genocide or just more of the Democide attributed to the illegal policy and its horrific consequences. Don't forget, the diabetic policy is Nation wide, not just British Columbia, and if the B Cs gov't needed to steal documents and not refer me to any science that was legally used to justify policy, then all diabetic policies are illegal. Then add all other illegal policies the gov't has contrived and illegally forces upon the public. And then move this to the world. What kind of damage to society and its people is being done through the corruption surrounding diabetes? The USA has just pronounced that by 2020 diabetes will impact 30% of its population. What kind of killing and maiming will be stopped, if the UN steps up now? Attack the corruption within Canada. Stand up for my Human Rights in Canada.
You really need to stand up here as this is a world problem, a very twisted frame of mind that needs to be changed. You really have the opportunity to change the world and make it a better place. If Canada can not help through the Peace Keepers as we once did, as my father did in Gaza, early 1960s, think of how many lives will be saved by confronting those twisted people running this policy.
Canada's Fall from Grace concerning this needs to be made public in order to bring us back to the Country that exemplifies and is not afraid to fight for Rights and Freedoms, for World Human Rights. For Right to Life, something these decadent, twisted, immoral, or amoral, civil servants have forgotten that Canada offers and fights for all over the world. Why not for Canadians, for diabetics, the disabled, First Nations people, for those dying in Emerge, for those wanting a reliable Universal Health Care System, for those waiting for surgery, for those that have been killed needlessly.

Human Rights Watch, 350 Fifth Ave., 34th Floor, NY, New York, 10118 – 3299, USA. You get a copy to add to the information I sent earlier, as to the corruption of the B C Human Rights Tribunal and its decision to change the scope of my HR Discrimination Complaint, the failure to acknowledge the stolen research, the failure to acknowledge the lie to cover up the theft and its consequences, the failure to acknowledge the gov't withdrew the science, therefore they did not defend the policy, or more importantly the illegal policy, the failure to acknowledge the policy is illegal, therefore discriminatory in itself without any game played with stolen research.
The BC HRT's credibility should be challenged publicly, in the world stage. They told me to get a lawyer instead of attacking their former employee and her presentation of stolen research and her lie. They know I do not a five or ten million dollars for a lengthy court case. They have become as corrupt as the gov't and its civil servants. This is why you also need to make this public. They have compromised their position as an independent autonomous third party. Why? This is what real Human Rights is about and they failed. In such a nice country as Canada and they failed. You need to expose this for the benefit of all Human Rights advocates and complaints. We do not empower Human Rights by burying failure only by acknowledging it and moving on. Those involved in burying the complaint should move on also as they have been compromised.

Montreal Institute For Genocide and Human Rights Studies, Concordia University, 1455 De Maisonneuve Blvd. West, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H3G 1M8. It's interesting isn't it that in B C the non - First Nations are covering this up and it is again First Nations people asking for their Rights, not only by the White Mans rules, which white guys break all the time and think nothing of it, but real bona fide Human Rights and a Right to Life; no attachments necessary, just Right to Life.
I know this letter reviews the previous Reviews I sent you but there are new things for you and the Sinclair Investigation is worth the work, as I see it as just another form of hidden Genocide against the First Nations people.
Also, you may use this how ever you like. Use it to inform your students, as this is what university should be about.
Expand their minds pro and against. Offer this to your Masters and PhD candidates; they have a good start and lots of direction. All those involved should be able to stand up and present why they have been doing this. They won't, even in court or the Hague. How can they justify one death, where they can't even acknowledge their behaviour that forced me to fund my own spinal surgery.

This mind - set of the civil service is the same twisted behaviour that refused to help in preventing the Genocide in Rwanda and tried to cover it up. So, they learned how to cover it up and apply the same formula here, with their own Genocide. The same corrupt mind - set that recently attacked the Afghan Vets for demanding health care; these corrupt civil servants should be charged with Treason, which would make the civil service a nice place to work in when the monsters have been withdrawn. Imagine the mental health of the bona fide civil servants needing to work under these killers, thieves, and liars. Not a healthy work place.
*

It's time you e-mailers were contacted as a Group to let you see you are not alone

You all get an update as I do not know who will be involved in the Investigation, Inquiry and Inquest involving these deaths, health care, and denials of responsibility and accountability. Diabetes driving policy is within all Canada and the consequences affect all diabetics, Canadians, and health care. There should be no doubt that after what I am experiencing as a diabetic, what diabetics experience, a person without Rights, and the corruption I have found myself within, with such horrific consequences, as exemplified through the deaths of Brian Sinclair and Olive Kirkness, the corruption will present itself in Manitoba. As said previously to the mental health advocates I contacted you really need to know what is happening to diabetics and the disabled and maybe this will help Vets also.


Martin Pollock, counsel for Gerald Briggs, suffered brain damage and Olive Kirkness and survivors, an unexpected and unexplained death in Emerge, other than Overcrowding. mjp@pollockandcompany.com
or mail@pollockandcompany.com

Clayton Ruby and Vilko Zbogar, counsel for Brian Sinclair and survivors, an unexpected and unexplained Emerge death, other than Overcrowding. vilko.zbogar@orkinlaw.ca

Shawn Atleo, National Chief of the Assembly of First Nations, this First Nations organization needs to be involved and have the same information about all the players that are involved and how deeply corrupt this whole event really is. info@shawnatleo.com

Canadian Mental Health Association, ceo@cmha.ca

Behavioral Diabetes Institute, info@behavioraldiabetes.org

Disabled World, admin@disabled-world.com

Medical Reform Group, medicalreform@sympatico.ca

National Eating Disorder Information Centre, nedic@uhn.on.ca

West Coast Womens Clinic, info@westcoastwomensclinic.com
CTV Winnipeg online news, winnipegnews@ctv.ca
Jillian Taylor and Laura Lowe you get a copy as you have written about the Sinclair and Kirkness deaths and the police investigation. Add this to the info already I have offered you.

William Elliot, Commissioner, RCMP National Headquarters, Headquarters Building, 1200 Vanier Parkway, Ottawa, ON, K1A 0R2
You get a copy because I believe you are the guy everyone loves to hate, according to the NEWS. Superintendent Graham Burnside, or whom ever he passed my complaint to have not acknowledge my complaint, not even a complaint number. How am I to refer this to you without any acknowledgment of material complaint? With a complaint number?
This is big stuff, biggest stuff in your and my lifetime. Canada's Genocide. Corrupt civil servants, lawyers, public as well as gov't, and politician's. Homicide, maiming, endangerment to Life. Theft of protected scientific research. Falsifying legal documents, Affidavits, and gov't policy paper. Theft of taxes to pay for the demands of an illegal gov't policy. Breach of Oath of Office by senior civil servants and gov't lawyers. And more. And Burnside has not contacted me or given me a number. You have no choice to bury this or play favorites just because who the players are and their corruption.
Maybe you need to fire some people. Once again, why is it that your counsel while considering the stolen scientific research that the A G Supervising lawyer presented to justify the illegal policy and therefore the killing, refused to acknowledge she broke her Oath of Office to Obey the Law, do not Kill, do not Steal, do not Lie, do not Mislead, do not Misrepresent, etc? Why is it that they did not acknowledge she broke the Trust of Affidavits? Your staff are burying this.
*

This addition to the Emerge problems happened the other day. Another legal complaint. How many should there be?

Tapper Cuddy, LLP, tc@tappercuddy.com This Overcrowded Emerge problem was reported by CTV News, Friday, November 12, 2010, after I had this letter copied for the above and others to come, Nov 15, 2010.
Tapper Cuddy all the above have been contacted before, through a mass mailing on my part or individually by email, as I discovered their organization. Now you are on the list.
As my funding for copying and mailing is limited I now direct email Contacts to my Blog, hoping they read.
2diabetes.blogspot.com The RCMP, UN, universities, etc are by paper. This letter will also be posted on the blog.

The Blog site I use has changed lately and I have been able to paste my Human Rights letters, Responses to gov't, the Updated Consequences, my Response to the first Diabetic Driver's Policy paper, response to the government's Science presentation done to justify the policy and Overcrowded Emerge, which was based upon stolen research, which is important for everyone involved, as you will be confronted by science, and two Reviews of what has happened to me, which influences how your client has been treated.
As I have stated to the mental health advocates I contacted, I strongly advise you to read what I have found myself immersed in, as it explains the Overcrowding in Emerge, therefore the killing, maiming, and lack of care, which is gov't driven and they know it and are burying it in BC. They will bury it from you also.
By the way, I chose to buy private health care, as I did not want to enter Emerge with the spinal problem I had, and maybe become disabled or die due to the Overcrowding, due to corrupt civil servants and politicians and their illegal policies. The civil servants that are doing this to me or society, are real bona fide monsters, and when you start asking questions, as I did, all that you are about to read will express to you.
Welcome to the world of Genocide, “Democide”, that I have found myself within.