Important note; About 5% of The Lancet's publications are not scientific papers or peer reviewed papers. This is good as it offers different ideas and interests that are not main stream or interests not funded by whomever, such as what I have come to discover what I have become involved in that really is important for the lay person, doctors, and researchers; especially all the peer reviewed journals that had their research stolen and presented by an academic researcher paid to justify an illegal policy that is not needed, does nothing, and kills and maims naive bystanders.
The Lancet did respond and say no thank you and I may have better luck elsewhere. I asked who? The responded with, it would be inappropriate to direct me elsewhere. This is a moral or ethical decision to not direct me. But isn't the decision to not publish what is happening to me a decision that fails ethically? Isn't the theft of research more important. The theft of their own research. This theft could have been exposed worldwide as what not to do with protected research. I would have exposed the corruption surrounding diabetes and the phoney driver medical examinations. And, as G P are leaving this field of medicine, have long wait times for a visit, this could have exposed the wholeness of the demands upon G Ps by illegal gov't policies. this would have been the moral or ethical thing to do no matter how corrupt and extensive this corruption is. Yes, England also has these phoney demands upon the diabetic driver, which also compromises G P availability and care and G P personal health.
Too bad as The Lancet really had the opportunity to change the world by letting the world know about what this blog is about concerning diabetes; illegal policy, science that proves there is no difference between non-diabetic and type 2 diabetes, gov't corruption, academic researcher's theft and lies, lawyer's lies, falsifying legal documents, the failure of the BC human rights organization to protect rights and lives, etc, etc.
And if this is what is happening with diabetes then what is happening with the other one hundred medical conditions the BC Office of the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles they say they are monitoring?
Dave Jenkins
3107 Tanglewood Way
Nanaimo, BC, Canada, V9T 5A5
June 17 - July 6, 2010
The Other Consequences of Intervention into Type 2 Diabetes
or
Canada's Hidden Genocide
Dear The Lancet,
Hello. I am not a PhD, doctor, researcher, professor, or professional writer, those titles listed in the Registration program. I have type 2 and have confronted what is happening to me. Those hiding what they are doing to me are like a virus and are out of control. The people running this diabetic policy are not in denial of the consequences of their actions, as they have been fighting me for eight years because they are cognizant of what they are doing? They are like a virus that I have discovered, which seems to be not to obnoxious, therefore just accepted and not acknowledged for the killer it is. Like viruses, these people and their policy are really out of control, at times seems controlled or in remission with intervention, but then resurfaces with additional defenses, corrupts its surroundings, escalating the damage as the medium it lives in, life, is itself growing. Diabetes is not out of control and killing and maiming hundreds of naïve bystanders, it is the gov't, irresponsible and unaccountable civil servants that are doing the killing and maiming, harm to society, and the Universal Health Care system, UNC. The deviant behaviour of those involved has increased as I have confronted them over the past eight years to where they have stolen your research to justify their illegal diabetic policy and the Genocide that it has created. Genocide because they had the opportunity to cancel the policy and they did not.
One death is an accident. The second should have seen the policy canceled. The third is Homicide. The fourth is a serial killer, the fifth is mass murder, isn't it. The tenth is Genocide, or Democide; the large killing of the public due to government policy.
**
Yes, this Covering Letter is long, but one does not expose corruption concerning type 2 and an academic researcher with five sentences. One does not think about type 2, its consequences, what is being done to diabetics and write about it on one page, not with eight years of questions and discovery. As scientists watch a virus for years to learn, then ask questions, probe for responding actions, I have done the same. As with scientists, discovery really does, sometimes, present through a serendipitous moment, which has happened to me. Lancet, you are involved because you run a scientific publication that is world wide. You think with a big idea, the idea of science and its world wide influence. I have only just moved into that big idea, to become awake to it.
Secondly you are involved for two reasons. Firstly the people I am challenging have stolen your research in order to justify an illegal social policy, the diabetic drivers policy and it horrific consequences. The consequences of the policy change the UHC system in B C and Canada, therefore all other countries having UHC. The consequences kill, maim, and endanger lives by the hundreds. That is why they have stolen your research and other who's who in science publications. This theft needs to be exposed. The bias, prejudice, hate, ignorance, fear and loathing, disgust, and contempt concerning diabetic is real. This discrimination turns the diabetic into the pariah, the Other, so they do not need to acknowledge the consequences of their behaviour and yet hound the diabetic due to the unproven consequences of diabetes.
Secondly, you bring science and medicine to the world, my discovery, research, and conclusion has merit, worth, and value. My question is why haven't researchers, doctors, epidemiologists, and others followed through as I have? Or have they?
Reader, I see The Lancet is covering diabetes this month. I bet you they do not bring forward what is happening to me and what I have discovered. It's too horrific. Work through the attachment or letter “updated consequences” and then ask how many are really being killed, maimed, and have their lives endangered. Then ask where the dialogue that turns the diabetic into the pariah, the Other, comes from.
**
I have type 2 diabetes, since 1999, and challenged the diabetic drivers' policy as it seemed un-needed especially as the scientific research I was reading at that time, 1999 - 2003 conflicted with what was being told to me by the public and the Office of the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles, the gov't dept that manages licensing etc; it states that the diabetic and diabetic driver need to be medically managed as they are a Risk to society. (PubMed, Cox et al, 2003, “Diabetes and Driving Mishaps” and Harsch I. A. et al, 2002, “Traffic hypoglycemias and accidents in patients with diabetes mellitus treated with different antidiabetic regimens”.) Their work has not been challenged. I asked the Deputy SMV for the documents that were used to legally justify the policy. She replied that the policy is based upon someone's “view” of life. This is not good enough in Canada or for her Oath of Office. This means the policy is illegal, as the demands of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, Section 1, the British Columbia Human Rights Code, Section 8, and the B C Motor Vehicle Act, Sections 25, 29, and 92 require gov't to prove a real need with bona fide documents before intervening in the public life. I received nothing, that was 2002 – 2004. This means all the civil servants Forcing this illegal policy upon doctors and the diabetic are acting criminally. And when you add the consequences of the policy to their actions what are they then?
Secondly, the Deputy SMV wrote the policy is based upon some civil servants “view” of life. This is not good enough in Canada, as civil servants swear an Oath of Office to Follow the Law, Do Not Lie, Do Not Steal, Do Not Mislead, etc, etc. So, all the civil servants involved in this diabetic drivers policy are also guilty of breach of Oath of Office. These are the same civil servants that force Canadian doctors to fulfill the Drivers' Medical Examination that I am forced to comply with or I will loose my license. They will loose funding, medical privileges, and compensation.
These two legal demands and the consequences are why they stole research to justify the policy, but I had the guts to confront them. If I hadn't confronted these corrupted people of position, that of status, trust, power, and prestige, everyone would have read the diabetic policy has been scientifically, legally justified in Human Rights Discrimination Complaint #5791. You don't read that, therefore the policy is still illegal, little lone discriminatory, with doctors, diabetics, UHC system, and the public still being abused. With the diabetic presented as a liability, naïve bystanders being killed, maimed, and having their lives endangered due to this illegal policy. Now you know why they stole your research.
This theft needs to be made public; the “academic researcher”, Dr. Dobbs, needs to be held accountable for her actions. I'm not a scientist or researcher. I just like science. I'm alive because of science. Science is much to grand, or neat, and worthwhile to let Dobbs do this without acknowledging what she has done. She has put herself above everyone with this very nasty charade she has played out here. She is not ignorant of what she has conspired and done. Give her the attention she craves. Not only has she stolen research she has breached the Trust that comes with a Affidavit. Yes, I had to challenge that legal stamp and the law firm behind that Affidavit, which means all enclosed is legal and legal for use, but it wasn't. How's that for corruption? Dobbs has corrupted the very Standards that Science and Law are based upon. She has used different Hats to establish herself with the gov't presenting her as a 'Dr'. That seems ok but the ambiance of the policy and my complaint is of Medical doctors, not of a nurse doing enough research to be qualified as a PhD. With the theft and its presentation she has not fulfilled the Hats she wears giving her position in society. I Deconstructed her presentation and graded her paper, as no one established any values to fulfill, only that she is labeled a Dr. and we should just believe all and bow down to her. I failed her paper on numerous points not just because she stole research, which guarantees expulsion from university in Canada, and maybe one's job, clearly not a civil servants job, failed because it does not attend to the things it should. This deconstruction is available but it is sixty or so pages and not included at this time.
Also, when confronted about the theft, she lied about what she had done, she feigned she had misunderstood the scope my human rights complaint. Scientists acknowledge mistakes as it makes science better, they do not lie about their work. When she did this she was a new employee with the gov't. She is supposed to be writing a Guide to Driving, concerning disabled drivers. We need to ask, “What has she now stolen and lied about to justify those policies?”
*
Reader, I need to inform you that I contacted you in May 2009 about Copyright theft, Intellectual Property Rights theft, and Intent of Use misuse; your online legal dept, probably Elsevier. The complaint was not responded to. My wish was to have those that stole research and presented it in my HRT Discrimination complaint challenged as to what they had done. I also contacted the Royal Canadian Mounted Police, as it manages Intellectual Property theft. However, I discovered they only instigate a complaint for Canadians. Foreigners need to instigate a complaint through the RCMP. This response took months to come. My first letter was returned in pieces with a statement 'wrong department', no signature. I lodged a complaint. The reply stated the RCMP cannot do anything as foreigners need to instigate the complaint. I replied that the couple line response was not good enough in such theft. It seems counsel for the RCMP does not believe they would win the complaint. I wrote back explaining that winning does not mean putting people in jail, finding guilt with fines as that is all that would happen, it also means challenging those that stole protected research, to let them know, let the public know, that not fulfilling Copyright, Intellectual Property Rights, and Intent of Use, especially by civil servants is not acceptable. Interesting how the RCMP forgot these people are civil servants and bound by their Oath of Office, which I have just sent them a letter concerning this matter.
Secondly, it is interesting how the RCMP forgot that these stolen documents were sent through the mail; this is mail fraud.
After discovering this flaw in our legal system there should be no doubt that the lawyers that played this charade knew of this conundrum confronting the RCMP, the owners of research, and me. The people that have done this are not naïve bystanders. You were used and bullied as I was.
The second response from the RCMP supporting their unwillingness to make public the illegal use of research to try to legally justify the diabetic drivers policy has rekindled my endeavour to enlighten doctors, the public, and diabetics about the illegal policy, which is only based upon some unknown civil servants point of “view”. Always remember the RCMP have not acknowledge that the policy is illegal. How has their counsel forgotten this fact?
Reader, I needed to wait for the RCMP to respond before I could continue on in my challenge of those doing this to me and my attempt to make the world a better place, that is why I needed to wait until now to contact you. So, now you know why the gap from my initial email contact to your legal department and now. Its bona fide.
My Deconstruction of the first Draft of the new diabetic policy is available. The review of the second Draft is listed as confidential. My seventy page letter to the RCMP, Press, Clergy, Hospital Administrators is also available as is my letter to the UN as they review what is and is happening concerning this policy and how I have been treated. I will photo copy Dobbs Affidavit, the first Draft, the gov't presentation to the HRT, and other letters for you, as there does not seem to be anyone else inquiring into the consequences of intervention into diabetic drivers, which means you have no background for you to make informative decisions upon. Interesting isn't it.
Lancet you want to change the world, as that is what you really do and sometimes the human spectacle is extremely ugly and nasty. You will need to get into this to understand the pariah, the Other, the genocide and world corruption. You may not like this as it confronts science, medicine, and gov't corruption. Too bad, if they don't like it, they shouldn't do it.
*
What Subtitle does my contribution fulfill?
“Information for Authors”, My story will entertain as the things happening to me should not happen to anyone, but certainly do when one challenges the status quo. My inquiry and challenge will advance or illuminate medical science and practice. It is also original in that, “Why hasn't anyone else considered the consequences of the intervention into the type 2 driver?” The neurosurgeon that operated on me May 09, certainly reviewed the consequences of his intervention.
“World Report”, “covering news about science, medicine policy issues, and people.” “. . . an important event in your country that might be of wider interest can be brought to the attention of our World Report editors via . . .” These four points are addressed within my discovery and writings about the intervention into the diabetic drivers' policy.
“Correspondence”, “letters of general interest, unlinked to items published in the journal . . .” Definitely not linked to anything published.
“Articles”, “prioritises reports of original research that are likely to change clinical practice or thinking about a disease.” Although not “research” in the formal sense , but “original” what I have discovered and challenged will change how we think about diabetes and how diabetics are treated clinically and publicly. When exposed maybe this will help stop or curb General Practitioners from leaving General Practice due to illegal, unnecessary demands upon them, resulting in the lack of bona fide or real medical practice.
“Seminars, Reviews, and Series”, “Ideas are also welcomed for our Series, which are commissioned to run over consecutive weeks.” This could be done as if I only list what has/is happening to me, a diabetic and diabetic driver, you and your readers would not believe this is happening in Canada. Maybe your country too. Therefore, one of my seventy page letters concerning all this would indeed have readers waiting to see what follows to the diabetic.
“Case reports”, this has/is really happening to me. The diabetic drivers policy is illegal, I needed to pay for the Drivers' Medical Examination as it was a non - medical necessity, therefore not paid for by our UHC system.
My Human Rights Discrimination complaint brought a change to this fee payment in 2006; the gov't now pays for the DME. To do this the DME was magically changed to a medical necessity. So, the gov't runs an illegal policy, now funded by my taxes, for a medical exam that cannot do what it is alleged to be able to do, that is, predict, prevent, and manage hypoglycemia, the very the thing the policy has been invented for. So, when I needed bona fide, or a medical necessity, spinal surgery, I was told I would need to wait two years for surgery, as there are no taxes available for people like me, although the civil servants found millions of dollars to pay for the anti-diabetic policy and its demands. A neurosurgeon told me I would loose the control of my lower bowels if I waited any longer, I was successfully operated upon within the week. I bought private surgery at a very controversial private hospital/clinic, Cambie Surgery Centre, that has found its way into our UHC system due to the corruption and mismanagement within gov't; its illegal policy is driving the very real needs of people like me to go to private clinics as the underfunded neurosurgeon and his team operate on Fridays in Dr. Day's clinics. Diabetes is only one of a hundred medical conditions the OSMV supposedly manages. If only a view of life is used to justify the diabetes policy then what is used for all the other conditions and those consequences? And we wonder where G Ps time has disappeared to and why they are leaving this type of medicine.
Reader, you or your team will need to make the decision as to where this story about diabetes and it consequences will be or how it will be presented. I've done the work now you change the world.
***
The following is something that you will work through to evaluate my request for Publication. We do these things in business, science, medicine, and life. We all do this if we want to be successful. Why wasn't this done for the diabetic drivers' policy and intervention? Or was it? You may use different words or in a different order but you do this.
The Five Points of Engagement
1. Is the 'need' for intervention really there? Modern science says No. Is the policy a real 'need' or just a 'want'. It is a 'want' of unknown senior civil servants. The gov't bases the policy on their “view” that it is ok to do. Sorry, Canadian civil servants' “view” of the world is not good enough, as there are Laws to follow and their Oath of Office 'needs' to be fulfilled. So why do it? Why do it knowing the consequences? (Real the accompanying letter Updated Consequences.)
2. Can the 'intervention' really do what it is alleged to be able to do? No. The Driver's Medical Examination cannot predict, prevent, and manage hypoglycemia, the very reason for the policy. So why do it? Why do it knowing the consequences?
3. What are the 'consequences of the intervention'? They kill and maim hundreds of naïve bystanders, cause Emerge Overcrowding and surgery wait – lists, which endangered my life. So why do it? Why do it knowing the consequences?
4. Is there 'any Good'? No. The gov't has stated it has never studied the policy for any Good. How insane is that?
If there is no documentation to justify the policy in the first instance how can we know of change to prove Good? Secondly, as modern science states there is no problem to begin with how can there be any change to prove Good?
Third, if the policy is based up some “view” of the world how can they prove Good? This exemplifies bias, prejudice, hate, ignorance, fear and loathing, disgust, and contempt for people and Laws. This lack of accountability defines discrimination. It defines Corrupt people. So why do it? Why do it knowing the consequences?
5. And 'where are we now'? Reader, for my diabetes care I visit the doctor twenty (20) times compared to the one (1) time I am forced to visit the doctor for the private driving license; the Driver Medical Examination, DME is done every five years. This is never acknowledged by the gov't. Why? Because if they acknowledge I take care of myself it breaks the construction of the pariah, the Other, who does not care for themselves and needs gov't intervention no matter if it breaks the law and Social Contracts of life. It also breaks the ill - gained power that civil servants have over the doctor; acknowledging what the doctor and I do means the corrupt officials would need to publicly trust the doctor that he or she is responsible for the diabetic and that society does not need the civil servants to force policy upon the doctor and diabetic to make it seem the civil servant is doing something. The lose of power would be humiliating to those civil servants and would expose their corruption.
For my Class 4 license I visit eight (8) times to the one (1) time. Why has the policy continued on knowing this about diabetic care? Why continue knowing the killing, maiming, and negative influence upon those needing bona fide medical demands? Why has this never been acknowledged by the gov't, the Human Rights Tribunal, and the 'civil servant lawyers' attacking me instead of the illegal policy? So, why are doctors and I forced to comply with the demands of an illegal policy? Why do it knowing the above? Hate? Lust for power? Denial of Responsibility and Accountability? Denial of Genocide? They have gone to far over the Edge and they know it, therefore the theft and charades to bury it.
Lastly, as stated above, my first human rights complaint saw a change in who pays for the DME. The gov't now pays $75 for most examinations, whereas before August 2006 the diabetic or disabled driver needed to pay whatever the doctor charged for a 'non-necessary medical' examination, usually about $150.00. On the surface this is good thing but the taxes used to pay for this illegal policy and its non-necessary demands on the UHC system, which offers No Good, should be used for 'necessary medical' demands, surgeries, which offer Good. So, the shuffling of taxes to pay for the DME is to make the policy look legal, as why would the gov't pay for the demands of an illegal policy. This is just another charade, a false marriage, done to give the policy the look of legitimacy. Why indeed? Isn't the shuffling of taxes to pay for an illegal policy and its demands upon the UHC system fraud? This is an example of the charades played out by the gov't and its counsel that you really need to work through, as it is all done to present that the policy is legal, therefore the killing is legally justified. Do they really believe we believe this killing is then legal and acceptable? The $75 comes from what my doctor charged for the DME. He is forced to give the DME, knows it cannot do what it is alleged to be able to do, and does no Good, therefore he only charged half the going rate. It's called civil disobedience on his behalf. You can hear the civil servants in the dark recesses of gov't buildings coming to terms with what to compensate doctors now the gov't pays for the DME, whom they already force to do their dirty work and be the fall guy, the scapegoat, for Emerge deaths and maiming, 'if that is all this doctor wants to charge, then that is all they will get'. Their pettiness is expected.
The gov't reimbursed my DME fees as part to the breached out of court settlement agreement for the discrimination complaint and that is how they came to know what he charged; however, they didn't reimburse any other disabled drivers though; hows that for discrimination. That lead to my second HRT discrimination complaint, #5699.
Now, All G Ps administering the DME do not get paid for their time. I wonder if my doctor's colleagues know this.
*
What Good comes from publication?
Reader, this would be a good time to let the world know that this kind of behaviour by insignificant civil servants, in an insignificant province, of an insignificant country, Canada, is not acceptable. The diabetic driver's policy is still illegal because I had the guts, the fortitude, the grit, the courage, the backbone to stand up to corruption. To confront the “academic researcher” and her position in health and science, who also swore an Affidavit that the 189 articles presented were legally bona fide for use, to challenge the lawyer from one of the most prestigious law firms in Canada, to confront the government's Supervising lawyer who hired the previous lawyer, and the Deputy Superintendent of Motor Vehicles who runs the policy.
It should be known that the Human Rights Tribunal did not have the guts to challenge this theft and the gov't lie that the gov't had misunderstood the scope of the discrimination complaint, therefore the inordinate number of articles. Why?
This lie was damage control with the gov't trying to exclude all articles not associated with type 2, which meant about 180 articles; those remaining included the research I use to challenge the policy. (Think about that.) No acknowledgment that those remaining articles were still stolen articles and could not be used. The government's first Response to Complaint acknowledges that they know the true scope of the human rights complaint. They lied which changed legal documents. And the HRT buried this. The prestigious law firm's lawyer who presented this previously worked for the HRT. (Think about that.) When I pointed the lie out to the HRT it told me to get legal advice if I didn't like what was happening. (Interesting isn't it.) The world should know about this medical and scientific corruption.
I don't know about England but in Canada four out of ten adults are functioning illiterate. That means they could not do what I have done, read what is being done to me and write about it. They just trust the Standards that have been developed over time, so that they do not get screwed or manipulated by those in the position of status, trust, power, and prestige. All those positions I needed to evaluated and come to terms with to understand what they have done, not only corrupted Science by they theft and lie but the Trust we, as modern democratic societies freely give lawyers, academic researchers, and civil servants. They have broken their privilege of academic researcher, Code of Conduct of lawyers, Oath of Office of civil servants, our Social Contracts, and manipulated the illiterate and Trusting people.
They have broken the Trust of those that have given it freely, those that cannot read and write. They have broken the Trust of those doctors, civil servants, lawyers, and other academic researchers that stand by the Standards knowing their backs turned and open to abuse. I believe in these standards and was manipulated and lied to. I represent millions of people.
These civil servants asked for a Human Rights Hearing protocol, an Early Dismiss Application, that eliminates the Public, the Press, and Witnesses in order to play this charade, hoping I would be bamboozled by their position in law, society, science, and by the number of scientific articles presented. Only papers were presented.
Lancet, what would you do with 189 scientific research articles coming from not only you but many Who's Who in the scientific world, presented through an academic researcher, through an Affidavit, presented through a human rights lawyer working for maybe the most prestigious law firm in Canada, the senior supervising gov't lawyer, and with only a month for a Response? Would you stand up or crumble due to the ambiance of the presentation?
This charade defines corrupt people. This defines Nazis, corrupting science to solve the woes of society on the backs of the disabled and caring nothing for the Laws of Democracy, Human Rights Codes, Motor Vehicle Acts, and the Social Contract we live by, and the Standards of Science.
These people escalated my human rights complaint to be world wide with their theft, as the science comes from the world, therefore the world, the scientific community, diabetics, and UHC systems should know about this policy, its very real consequences, the lack of acknowledgment of these by the gov't, the theft, the lies, and the gov't charades to bury it.
Publishing this will expose corruption, just as phoney cold fusion research has been exposed. We all have an obligation to expose this theft and its corruption just as the consequences need to be exposed. Diabetics are not monsters.
*
Reader, due to the length of time the RCMP took to inform me they would do nothing concerning the theft, the breach of Copyright, the theft of Intellectual Property Rights, and misuse of Intent of Use it may be too late for the Lancet and other publications to do anything legally to these foreign thieves and liars, as exemplified by human rights complaints, there is a six month window. However, this does not mean your publication cannot expose what has been done to the science community as the delay is bona fide. These people have put themselves above the law, science, and social contracts and should be given the opportunity to respond to their peers, the owners of the publications, owners of the research, diabetics, and the public.
The publication will reinforce the demand for compliance to scientific standards, Copyright, Intellectual Property Rights, and Intent of Use protection instruments even in places where supposedly no one is watching, a Human Rights Discrimination Complaint and Early Dismiss Application.
This may also help expand Canada's Intellectual Property Rights law, as it is now changing law to protect movies and music, which depend upon science, just not medical science, although these really are part of modern medicine.
*
What has been done to me has been done to all diabetics. All disabled. All academic researchers. All scientists and fifty or so more scientific publications.
Publishing this will debunk the prejudice against the diabetic. It will expose the corruption in the civil service, which tarnishes the civil service. It will expose illegal demands upon the medical system and their consequences. Expose the demands upon the medical system, mostly General Practitioners, who are forced to comply with these non - meaningful pointless medical examinations and forms. It will expose demands upon the medical system that are done but not funded by the health care system, therefore not managed; by management I mean the demand upon the G P who's time is taken away for these demands and not recorded as they are not paid for by the health care system, therefore not managed, the debit of doctors is not acknowledged. With the result being, “Where have the G Ps gone?” and “Where has the G Ps Time gone?” These phoney demands also help explain the long wait - times to see a G P. This exposure will certainly help the G P in crisis, as a person and as a field of medicine. G Ps are leaving this field of medicine due to phoney exams, illegal policy, phoney forms etc, all leading to a lack of fulfillment of medicine. Someone needs to stand up for the G P.
*
This exposure will also help the UHC systems that are endangered due to new demands and unacknowledged debits, such as this policy which is illegal to begin with but still forced upon the diabetic, disabled, G P, and the medical system. Diabetes is approximately 9% of society now, 5% in 1999, and what I have discovered concerning it begs the questions of; “How many other government demands are also illegal, not medically necessary, offer no Good, or legal and may already be managed sufficiently as my diabetic care is.”
“Why hasn't the government done an epidemiological study concerning this diabetic policy, as I have been challenging them for eight years now about the legality and the horrific consequences?” I believe I asked them this question years ago.
“Why hasn't the gov't proved the demand upon the UHC system is acknowledge and managed?”
“Where are the Medical Ethicists in this?” I wrote a very prestigious one, Margaret Somerville, and she never responded that she even got the mail. I send my letters by Canada Post, which allows me to know they got to where they are supposed to go but it doesn't mean they read does it, just got there. Surely she knows this is genocide and harms UHC system. If Medical Ethicists had any credibility they would have done this years ago, prove the need and the consequences offer Good. Challenged the corruption. Why haven't they?
*
This will expose the madness of the Overcrowding in Emerge facilities the Emerge doctors report about, that shouldn't be there. There because people need to wait for three to five, sometimes seven days to visit a G P, as happens in the clinic I visit, because the G P is filling out useless forms for illegal pointless examinations. I go to emerge with my kids, wife, grandparents, and myself. The fifty percent of those in Emerge that should not be there are not Martians, they are people like you and me.
Also, the Emerge doctors are held responsible for the deaths as they worked on the client. They are then used to inform the survivors and yet they did not construct the Overcrowding, the civil servants running illegal policy have done this. They should be in Emerge explaining why the deaths are acceptable and where the Overcrowding really comes from.
*
The accompanying letter, “updated consequences”, works through how many doctors disappear for only diabetics. G Ps Time disappears as they are forced to fulfill the gov't Examinations and Forms. Emerge doctors Time also disappears, as a consequence of the lack of G P Time. The Emerge doctor's lack of Time inhibits their work with bona fide Emerge clients, therefore the death rate goes up. Those that should not be there take the Time away that is needed to evaluate and understand an Emerge client's problem, to have Time to think about it, to have Time to compare it with their own training and knowledge, to have Time to converse with their colleagues, to have Time to watch and evaluate the progress of the condition, Time to evaluate the intervention, and Time to reevaluate all that has happened. All changed due to the onslaught of clients that should not be there.
The Emerge doctors Time that is taken away due to the Overcrowding by illegal policies that take the G P out of circulation, their Time disappears for the client who then goes to Emerge for the perceived or believed instant care compared to a three to five day wait. This is not a correlation, but a direct consequence of the illegal policy.
Now add the other 100 or so medical conditions the OSMV supposedly manages. Which may already be managed by the G P like I am. Then add all the other medical demands the gov't uses the UHC system for, which are not acknowledged in health care management, therefore the G P misuse is not acknowledged as a debit. And you wonder why they stole six of your articles and another 183 or so and lie, falsify documents, breach Affidavits, etc, etc.
*
Reader, 9% of the 4 300 000 people in BC gives approximately 387 000 diabetics. Canada approx 2 880 000. USA approx 32 000 000; the population of Canada. England has approx 4 590 000. How many in Europe? The world. All based on science from the 1950s, 60s, 70s, 80s or 90s? That is what Dobbs, the academic researcher, stole and presented.
What is the demand upon the UHC systems in a time when all our systems are experiencing demands that may ruin them with chronic diseases expressing to a greater number of the aging population? What is the total demand from illegal demands such as this diabetic policy and all the others based solely upon some civil servants “view” of life? How many people have been killed, maimed, or had their lives endangered such as mine was?
*
Reader, you and the doctors, researchers, scientists, medical ethicists, and critical thinkers that represent The Lancet and Scientific Standards really have the opportunity to change the world for the diabetic, General Practitioners, Emerge doctors, the naïve bystanders that are waiting in Emerge only to die because of the Overcrowding, all those waiting to visit a doctor, all those survivors of Emerge deaths that will have an explanation of the death other than, “Sorry but the death was unexpected and unexplained only through the Overcrowding”, universal health care systems that are under attack, and researchers that have been tarnished by this theft and lie by one of their colleagues.
Due to the recent misinformation told to the last Solicitor General, who supposedly manages the civil servants and their policy concerning the disabled, the diabetic, who resigned due to the Risk of Corruption, as have the past three in as many years, and a few more since 1999, I came to realize the consequences of the policy must be worse than I understand. His senior staff lied to him and I told him so. He resigned before responding. I have come to understand that the consequences are defined through the word Genocide. A nasty term to come to terms with especially since I live in Canada, a liberal Democracy. However, we still do horrific things to the First Nations Peoples of Canada and non - white, non - Christian Canadians, such as all those involved in the Air India murders. Democide defines those large numbers of people killed by government policies. The people doing this to me have had at least eight years to stop the policy and they haven't knowing the harm, that it is illegal, there is no Good, and that I voluntarily visit the doctor 20 times compared to their once forced visit. They are very real monsters not the doctors and the disabled.
How the RCMP have treated me is not acceptable, neither is the behaviour from the Attorney General's Supervising lawyer, who is responsible for the breached first HRT discrimination complaint settlement agreement, presentation of stolen science, and the lie to cover it up. I have therefore written a second lengthy letter, 70 pages, that reviews what has happened to me, etc, etc to the RCMP, Human Rights Watch, as they are outside of the influence of this local corruption, UN Secretary General's Special Advisor on the Prevention of Genocide, Montreal Institute for Genocide and Human Rights Studies, and the Board of the BC Medical Association, as they are supposed to be reviewing the diabetic policy and other medical conditions the OSMV supposedly manages, (forced to comply like the G P is to the policy), and the new Solicitor General.
*
Lancet, you represent the world of medicine, science, and ideas, and really need to step up to this world wide virus that needs to be cut out of the body of human life. What I have discovered and written about is lengthy and complicated and I didn't make it so. The people I have confronted know most people are pushed or push away from lengthy investigations and complications. That in itself warrants an inquiry.
Think about how many diabetics will learn they are not monsters, the pariah, the Other. Think about how many G Ps and the medical field of General Practice will be positively influenced. How many Emerge doctors will be positively influenced. How many naïve bystanders will have their lives saved. The decrease in maiming. The bona fide operations that will take place today, instead of years from now. How the demands upon the UHC system will be reviewed. How science will be protected. How your publication will be protected. How you and I really will change the world of diabetes, just as diabetes changed ninety years ago it is time for change again.
Thank you for your time,
Dave Jenkins
Labels: the lancet uses 5% non-peer reviewed writings or research
