5 pp, June 11, 2010, BC Medical Association, it is forced to review driver's policy? Genocide, emerge deaths, surgery wait times, G Ps
Dave Jenkins
3107 Tanglewood Way
Nanaimo, BC, V9T 5A5
June 11, 2010
Board Members
BC Medical Association
115 – 1665 W. Broadway,
Vancouver, B. C., V6J 5A4
Dear Board Members;
I recently wrote the Solicitor General about my inquiry into the diabetic drivers' policy and how I have been treated by Senior Civil Servants concerning that inquiry and subsequent Human Rights Complaints; Aug 14, 2009 with his response Oct 7, 2009. The S G responded that his staff informed him the inquiry and complaint had been addressed by the BC Human Rights Tribunal and that if,
“the OSMV is not fulfilling its obligations under that settlement agreement, or if you continue to have concerns about these issues, you may wish to seek the advice of legal counsel.”
What this response really means is he is telling to get stuffed. To take a hike. That he is not going to manage his staff and their corrupt behaviour. His response is not acceptable as the S G is supposed to manage the OSMV and he hasn't. He has a legal obligation to make sure policy or demands upon the public are legal and bona fide. He didn't do that. He chose to turn a blind eye. He condoned the behaviour of corrupt civil servants. He believed the lies his staff told him. He buried my complaint. The policy against the diabetic driver is still illegal and they know it. The killing continues.
So, if his staff will lie to him, deceive the public, mislead the public, steal and lie to me, then they will lie to you.
In the middle of this contact he was forced to resign. He's the third or fourth S G in as many years, and more since I began my inquiry in 2002. With this new set of lies and denial of corruption and slaughter concerning the S G office and its policies I have contacted the RCMP and the United Nations Genocide Prevention Department. This is Genocide, or Democide, genocide in a Democratic society.
And B Cs “physicians, medical residents, and medical students” support the Fascists and Nazis doing this to me. (your web page) Doctors, your board members have involved you in genocide.
***
Reader, I believe you are reviewing gov't policy concerning drivers, the “Guide to Drive Project”, in my case, drivers with type 2 diabetes. I began with a Class 4 license and now have a Class 6.
I began my inquiry into the Office of the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles' policy in 2002. There have been three British Columbia Human Rights Tribunal complaints concerning the policy and how the OSMV treats me. The last complaint, #5791, saw the BCHRT bury my complaint until All medical conditions the OSMV supposedly manages are reviewed by your organization and some unknown organizations or people. (From the BCHT Decision, February 4, 2009.) The HRT did not have the Right to do that. They changed the “Scope” of my complaint without my knowledge and consent. If I wanted to challenge the Decision one would need to go to court for about one or two hundred thousand dollars. The HRT knows this. When people or organizations do this for protection you know they are corrupt. (More about this in the letter to the RCMP and the United Nations.)
My point is, the S G's response implies the policy is legal, which it is not. My discrimination complaint is that the diabetic drivers' policy not only treats me differently for no good reason but also that the policy is illegal. It has never been legally justified by any documentation which is demanded by the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, the Motor Vehicle Act, and the Human Rights Code. It is up to the Politicians to control the civil servants, make sure policy is legal, and make sure the civil servants uphold their Oath of Office. The S G turned his back on this. He feigned ignorance. He was a policeman for thirty years. He knows about Oaths, compliance, and stonewalling. He and other S G did not attend to their Oath of Office and now they are gone. It is good he is gone.
But now I need to start all over again, with a new S G, in a corrupt office, therefore the RCMP and the UN. The RCMP and the UN deal with Nazis and their genocide. Why aren't you?
How did his staff forget these facts? They didn't, they are corrupt.
Secondly, the civil servants doing this to me have sworn an Oath of Office to Obey the Law, Do No Harm, Do Not Lie, Do Not Falsify Documents, Do Not Mislead, Do Not Steal, etc, etc. So, why haven't they been fired? Because there would be an admission of wrong. Because there would be accountability. Because they have constructed me as the pariah, the Other, therefore they believe they can do what they want to me. Because this policy kills and maims so many people the politicians cannot do anything to make it public due to their knowledge of it and the condoning of it. By supporting this illegal policy, with consequences which are horrific to say the least, they have broken their Oath of Office, which means dismissal and legal action. Lying and stealing also breaches the Oath of Office. So, the politicians protect them.
How did the S G and his staff forget their Oaths of Office?
The SG had to resign due to the “Risk” of a breach of an Oath of Office, as other S Gs did. Only a Risk of impropriety forced their resignations. These civil servants have broken their Oath, there is no “Risk” of the breach, they have breached it numerous times. Why do they still have their jobs? Corruption.
And you are supposed to review and recommend their anti-diabetic policy, which is an ongoing Homicide? Genocide.
Lastly, as the diabetic drivers' policy is based upon the supposed consequences of diabetes there are also the consequences of the policy to acknowledge, just like doctors do with their interventions. However, the consequences of the policy have never been acknowledged by the senior civil servants running the policy and their supporters. Why?
They are not acknowledged because One death is an Accident.
The Second death should have seen the policy canceled.
The Third death is Homicide. Death through indifference to human life or reckless endangerment causing death.
The Fourth or Fifth death is what? A serial killer? Mass murder?
The Tenth death coming from gov't policy is only mass murder?
Do we really need to wait for the next death to come to the realization of Genocide? As the killing is based upon a government policy the genocide is defined as Democide: people that are killed in large numbers due to government policies.
Reader, how many people have died in Emerge facilities due to the Overcrowding the illegal government policy has created since I became diabetic in 1999 and have been inquiring about the policy since 2002? Hundreds. That is why your colleagues, Emerge doctors, call Press conferences about the unexpected and unexplained deaths in Emerge, only explained by Overcrowding.
How many have been maimed, crippled, or disabled due to the unexplained Overcrowding?
How many like me have had to buy their medical necessary bona fide surgery because taxes have been diverted to pay for the illegal Drivers Medical Examination and should be used for surgeries? How many have died waiting for surgery? How many are addicted to their medications due to the long surgery wait - times?
*
The Out of Court Settlement Agreement coming from my first complaint, #1954, promised changes to the demands upon diabetic drivers, changes to an existing policy. However, as stated above I was never given an original policy justifying the demands upon the diabetic drivers, that's why the policy is illegal. You've been asked to justify an illegal policy that kills.
So, what ever you are reviewing is really the First Policy not a New Policy. The HRT Decision concerning my last complaint, #5791, two years ago, lies to the readers as I am not waiting for a New Policy but waiting for “A Policy”. In other words the policy is illegal and the HRT did not acknowledge this fact in their decision. It lied to the public.
The Settlement Agreement was four years ago. The tweaking of an existing policy does not take two years, therefore my last complaint, which was two years ago. So, four years have gone by with the policy still being illegal and killing people.
So, here I am waiting for you to evaluate not only the illegal demand upon diabetic drivers but all disabled drivers. You have been used as the scapegoat to protect those running this policy that kills, maims, and threatens peoples lives. What other lies are these civil servants telling about the other disabled drivers?
Have the corrupt civil servants informed you that the policy is only based upon some civil servants “view” of life? How conveniently they have forgotten their Oath of Office.
So, not only has the OSMV used you as the scapegoat the HRT has involved you, making you, a doctor, support an illegal social policy that kills people. They used you so they did not need to make a decision about the corruption and genocide knowing full well the killing continues.
So, not only does the OSMV use you, doctors, as the scapegoat for their policy, you are used to legitimize the illegal policy through your review and recommendation until the whole Guide is complete. The HRT has used you.
So, not only do they use you, doctors, as the scapegoat for their policy, as they use Emerge doctors to inform the survivors of those that have died in Overcrowded Emerge, created by the policy. Whereas, the civil servants running the illegal policy should be in Emerge defending their policy and the deaths and maiming. You can hear them can't you, 'the emerge deaths are acceptable as all this is done to keep those needle using diabetics under control.'
Why is it that Emerge doctors are used to explain these unexpected and unexplained deaths? They are not responsible for the Overcrowding. The illegal gov't policy is; it is not acknowledge, therefore not legally funded, nor managed properly.
*
Reader, within my last complaint, #5791, the OSMV special “academic researcher”, Dr. Bonnie Dobbs, presented 174 scientific articles on diabetes and stuff to justify the diabetic policy, plus 15 articles on Thyroid.
The problem is that All or most of the articles are protected by Copyright, Intellectual Property Rights, and Intent of Use protection instruments. These are stolen from the who's who of journals.
Without permission to use the research means the articles were stolen. When I confronted the OSMV about this they lied about not knowing the Scope of the complaint therefore the large number of articles presented. This lie was put forward as damage control, with the intent to use the remaining research to justify the policy. The HRT does not mention this theft and lie. Why?
Additionally, the OSMV did not present the remaining research to justify the policy, which means they withdrew their defense of my complaint. Which means they do not contest my complaint. Therefore, the policy should have been canceled. Why doesn't the HRT acknowledge this withdrawal of the defense of the policy?
The lie about misunderstanding the scope does not make the theft of scientific research legal. The remaining 5 - 10 articles on type 2 were still stolen documents. Nazis steal and corrupt science to get their way.
What stolen research have they given you? Has Dobbs stolen research to justify other disabilities the OSMV monitors?
My point is, if I had not challenged the theft, lie, and corruption concerning this you and everyone else would have been told the policy had been legally and scientifically justified through HRT complaint #5791. However, they cannot do that can they, because I stood up to these Nazis. So, now they have you trying to justify the policy. Has Dr. Dobbs given you research, foreign research? Are there Permission Forms? Permission forms to justify a foreign social policy that kills and maims hundreds and endangers peoples lives while they wait for surgery?
Reader, what documents have they given you? Have they also been stolen?
Doctors, would you steal research to justify your position?
Justifying the policy on stolen research turns you into what?
What do the medical ethicists say about this policy and the killing? Why are they so quiet?
So, if you have nothing to support the policy and its consequences then how do you support the Emerge doctors when they need to explain the unexpected and unexplained deaths due to the gov't constructed Overcrowding, theft, and lies? What science do you use? Stolen research? Some Nazis “view” of the world?
*****
Reader, I do not care what you do for a living or for your personal life but you work through these Five Points if you are successful or want to be. You may change the language or maybe the order. Gov't certainly needs to work through this and most of the time they do, lawyers do, human rights tribunals are supposed to, most people do, I do, and so should you, Doctors. The neurosurgeon that I needed to hire to operate on me last May certainly did.
The Five Points of Engagement
1. Is the 'need' for intervention really there? Modern science says No. Is the policy a real 'need' or just a 'want'. It is a 'want' of unknown senior civil servants, based upon their “view” that it is ok to do. Sorry, Canadian civil servants' “view” of the world is not good enough to make and run policy, as there are Laws to follow and their Oath of Office 'needs' to be fulfilled. So why do it? Why do it knowing the consequences?
2. Can the 'intervention' really do what it is alleged to be able to do? No. The Driver's Medical Examination cannot predict, prevent, and manage hypoglycemia, the very reason for the policy. So why do it? Why do it knowing the consequences?
3. What are the 'consequences of the intervention'? The consequences kill and maim hundreds of naïve bystanders every year. The policy causes the Overcrowding and surgery wait - lists. The policy turns me into a pariah, the Other. The policy endangered my life. So why do it? Why do it knowing the consequences? (Read the accompanying letter “Updated Consequences”)
4. Is there 'any Good'? No. The gov't has stated it has never studied the policy for any Good. How insane is that?
If there is no documentation to justify the policy in the first instance how can there be any baseline to show change to prove Good?
Secondly, as modern science states there is no problem to begin with means the idea of Good is a false Good?
Third, if the policy is based up some “view” of some Nazi civil servants how can they prove Good? This lack of accountability defines discrimination. It exemplifies bias, prejudice, hate, ignorance, fear and loathing, disgust, and contempt for people and Laws. It defines Corrupt people. So why do it? Why do it knowing the consequences?
5. And 'Where are we now?'. Reader, for my diabetes care I visit the doctor twenty (20) times compared to the one (1) time I am forced to visit the doctor for the policy and the Driver Medical Examination, DME. This is never acknowledged by the gov't and its supporters. Why? Because it exemplifies diabetics do care for themselves and doctors care for the diabetic and there is no need for the corrupt civil servants and their discriminatory hateful policy. The acknowledgment breaks the construction of the pariah, the Other.
For my Class 4 license I visit eight (8) times to the one (1) time. Why has the policy continued on knowing this about diabetic care? Why continue knowing the killing, maiming, and negative influence upon those needing bona fide medical demands? Why has this never been acknowledged by the gov't, the Human Rights Tribunal, and the 'civil servant lawyers' attacking me instead of the illegal policy? Why are doctors and I forced to comply with the demands of an illegal policy? Why do they continue knowing the above? Hate? Lust for power? Denial of Responsibility and Accountability? Denial of Genocide? Natural born killers? They have gone to far over the Edge and they know it, therefore the charades to bury it.
Lastly, you should know that my first human rights complaint saw a change in who pays for the DME. The gov't now pays $75 for most examinations, whereas before August 2006 the diabetic or disabled driver needed to pay whatever the doctor charged for a 'non-necessary medical' examination, usually about $150.00. On the surface this is good thing but the taxes used to pay for this illegal policy and its non-necessary demands on the health care system, which offers No Good, should be used for 'necessary medical' demands, surgeries, which offer Good.
So, the shuffling of taxes to pay for the DME is to make the policy look legal, as why would the gov't pay for the demands of an illegal policy. This is just another charade, a false marriage, done to give the policy the look of legitimacy. Why indeed? Isn't the shuffling of taxes to pay for an illegal policy and its demands upon the health care system fraud? This is an example of the charades played out by the gov't and its counsel that you really need to work through as it is all done to present that the policy is legal, therefore the killing is legally justified. The $75 comes from what my doctor charged for the DME. He is forced to give the DME, knows it cannot do what it is alleged to be able to do, and does no Good, therefore he charged only half the going rate. It's called civil disobedience on his behalf.
So, you can hear the gov't, 'if that is all this doctor wanted to charge that is all they will get'. The gov't reimbursed my DME fees as part to the breached out of court settlement agreement for the discrimination complaint and that is how they came to know what he charged.
Now, All G Ps administering the DME do not get paid for their time. The people that set this up are petty and criminal and hide in bureaucracy of gov't. There is no way they do not know this policy is illegal and kills.
*****
Democide ““is a term coined by political scientist R. J. Rummel for “the murder of any person or people by a government, including genocide, politicide, and mass murder”.” (this applies to this policy)
“Democide can also include deaths arising from “intentionally or knowingly reckless and depraved disregard for life””. (this applies to this policy)
“Some examples of democide cited by Rummel include the Great Purges carried out by Joseph Stalin in the Society Union . . ., the deaths from the colonial policy of the Congo Free State, Mao Zedong's Great Leap Forward resulting in a famine which killed millions of people. According to Rummel, these were not cases of genocide, because those who were killed were not selected on the basis of their race, but were killed in large numbers as a result of government policies.”, therefore the term Democide. (this applies to this policy) (the above is from Wikipedia, Democide, pp 1– 2, 06/03/2010, which are referenced)
*
And you board members are going to support this policy and other policies against the disabled now you know how corrupt they are and the killing that is taking place? Do All doctors know how corrupt the policy is? That it is illegal? That it kills? That you doctors are being used as a buffer between the survivors and those doing the killing, the scapegoat?
Those doing this to the disabled, the public, the naïve bystanders, and doctors are not going to hate you any more if you stand up and refuse to support them. The public refusal may force these monsters to resign or be fired as the Solicitor Generals have had to do. Forcing doctors to review this policy is just another charade, just like the act of paying for the DME, which marries the payment to the policy, an illegal policy payed by taxes, which means the whole act is fraud. Your forced participation is the same, involve doctors to make it seem as if the policy is legal to begin with, which it isn't. Forced participation is a bogus endorsement.
This is no different than the review of the Drafts I offered, participation as if that acknowledges the policy to be legal. It doesn't. The Draft is so corrupt I reviewed it as now it is a document that exposes the bias, prejudice, hate, ignorance, fear and loathing, disgust, and contempt for the diabetic. That is what that charade is about. The Drafts are full of lies, misrepresentation, misleading numbers, misinterpretation, fearful language, and finishes off with someone trying to justify the policy by saying that medical conditions that may express in 10, 15, or 20 after being diagnosed with type 2 is good enough to justify the policy. Bullshit. This is what Nazis do, corrupt science, and medicine, and life to get what they want. Use threats and fear to get what they want. I'm not afraid of these Nazis scum and neither should you be. They are a cancer that needs to be cut out of the public body.
The people doing this to the public, myself, and doctors do visit doctors for health care and surgery. You cannot refuse to help these monsters, as that would turn you into them. You really need to say “No” to these corrupt people. Saying “No” is passive resistance. It is a beginning. Say “no” and see what these monsters will do. Let them lie and threaten you for all to see. Expose the killing they are doing, with your Emerge doctors being held accountable for. Expose the stolen research, as I have no doubt they have done this to you, as they have done this to me. Write the RCMP and the United Nations Genocide Department.
Stand up for yourselves, your personal health as a doctor. Stand up for doctors all over the world. Stand up for the diabetics, the disabled, the functioning illiterate that don't know the Nazis and corrupt civil servants are doing this to them. Stand up for your clients, people like me. Stand up for the Charter, the Human Rights Code, and the Motor Vehicle Act. Canada is more important than these corrupt civil servants and their hate and discrimination. Stand up for the breach of Trust society has freely given to these civil servants that they have broken. Stand up for your Oath, the Code of Ethics that demands you do no harm; this policy harms me medically, socially, economically, emotionally, and endangered my life. These are harms you do not want to be involved in. Let that be your instrument to challenge the civil servants who have breached their Oath of Office, that politicians have breached. These Nazis are challenging your Code of Ethics while forcing you to falsely support this policy. Just because they breach their Oath of Office, steal research, lie when caught, refuse to acknowledge the consequences of their actions, etc, etc, does not mean doctors need to do the same. Your forced affiliation with these people should be exposed, as it will make medicine and society a better place. Make the General Practitioners' place in medicine better, as they will not be filling out corrupt medical forms for corrupt medical examinations and maybe the G P will stop leaving the G P place in medicine.
Doctors, Refuse to endorse this prejudicial and hateful policy that makes illegal demands upon society, doctors, the disabled, our tax dollars which are needed for bona fide medical demands, and kills and maims the naïve bystander in Emerge and surgery wait - lists.
Remember the policy is illegal, the DME cannot do what is alleged to be able to do, the Nazis do not acknowledge the consequences of their policy, there is no good realized from the policy, and I already visit the doctor for diabetes care as does every diabetic taking medication and others that do not at a rate of 20 to 1. So, why support these monsters and their hate, prejudice, and illegal activities. Why run the Risk of conflict with your Code of Ethics?
False and illegal government demands upon the medical system are ruining our health care system, as they are not acknowledged, therefore not legally funded, therefore they cannot be managed. These demands take the doctors out of the medical system to fulfill these illegal demands; their hours of availability for bona fide medical needs are diminished due to these illegal demands. This refusal would help stop the Emerge Overcrowding and Emerge Admissions, help the ambulance service overcrowding, stop the abuse of the G P with the withdrawal of the hundreds of hours needed to fill out gov't forms that are not needed, which would allow the G P to practice bona fide medicine, which would decrease the wait - times to see a doctor, as they would not be filling out useless Medical Examinations and Forms for illegal gov't policy.
As the diabetic policy is illegal we must acknowledge the gov't is also making other illegal demands upon the health care system that are not funded, therefore not acknowledged, therefore not managed, therefore a deficit upon the medical system that remains an unknown conundrum not being addressed. Gov't itself is the wasteful consumer of medical care not the public.
Canada is still a working democracy, civil servants do not make policy, they do not do things because in their “view” it is ok to do. These civil servants need to be fired and held accountable for their actions, as they have breached their Oath of Office with their illegal policy, theft of research, lies, etc, etc, as Politicians have been.
Doctors are more important than corrupt civil servants and they actually do Good.
Regards
Dave Jenkins
3107 Tanglewood Way
Nanaimo, BC, V9T 5A5
June 11, 2010
Board Members
BC Medical Association
115 – 1665 W. Broadway,
Vancouver, B. C., V6J 5A4
Dear Board Members;
I recently wrote the Solicitor General about my inquiry into the diabetic drivers' policy and how I have been treated by Senior Civil Servants concerning that inquiry and subsequent Human Rights Complaints; Aug 14, 2009 with his response Oct 7, 2009. The S G responded that his staff informed him the inquiry and complaint had been addressed by the BC Human Rights Tribunal and that if,
“the OSMV is not fulfilling its obligations under that settlement agreement, or if you continue to have concerns about these issues, you may wish to seek the advice of legal counsel.”
What this response really means is he is telling to get stuffed. To take a hike. That he is not going to manage his staff and their corrupt behaviour. His response is not acceptable as the S G is supposed to manage the OSMV and he hasn't. He has a legal obligation to make sure policy or demands upon the public are legal and bona fide. He didn't do that. He chose to turn a blind eye. He condoned the behaviour of corrupt civil servants. He believed the lies his staff told him. He buried my complaint. The policy against the diabetic driver is still illegal and they know it. The killing continues.
So, if his staff will lie to him, deceive the public, mislead the public, steal and lie to me, then they will lie to you.
In the middle of this contact he was forced to resign. He's the third or fourth S G in as many years, and more since I began my inquiry in 2002. With this new set of lies and denial of corruption and slaughter concerning the S G office and its policies I have contacted the RCMP and the United Nations Genocide Prevention Department. This is Genocide, or Democide, genocide in a Democratic society.
And B Cs “physicians, medical residents, and medical students” support the Fascists and Nazis doing this to me. (your web page) Doctors, your board members have involved you in genocide.
***
Reader, I believe you are reviewing gov't policy concerning drivers, the “Guide to Drive Project”, in my case, drivers with type 2 diabetes. I began with a Class 4 license and now have a Class 6.
I began my inquiry into the Office of the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles' policy in 2002. There have been three British Columbia Human Rights Tribunal complaints concerning the policy and how the OSMV treats me. The last complaint, #5791, saw the BCHRT bury my complaint until All medical conditions the OSMV supposedly manages are reviewed by your organization and some unknown organizations or people. (From the BCHT Decision, February 4, 2009.) The HRT did not have the Right to do that. They changed the “Scope” of my complaint without my knowledge and consent. If I wanted to challenge the Decision one would need to go to court for about one or two hundred thousand dollars. The HRT knows this. When people or organizations do this for protection you know they are corrupt. (More about this in the letter to the RCMP and the United Nations.)
My point is, the S G's response implies the policy is legal, which it is not. My discrimination complaint is that the diabetic drivers' policy not only treats me differently for no good reason but also that the policy is illegal. It has never been legally justified by any documentation which is demanded by the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, the Motor Vehicle Act, and the Human Rights Code. It is up to the Politicians to control the civil servants, make sure policy is legal, and make sure the civil servants uphold their Oath of Office. The S G turned his back on this. He feigned ignorance. He was a policeman for thirty years. He knows about Oaths, compliance, and stonewalling. He and other S G did not attend to their Oath of Office and now they are gone. It is good he is gone.
But now I need to start all over again, with a new S G, in a corrupt office, therefore the RCMP and the UN. The RCMP and the UN deal with Nazis and their genocide. Why aren't you?
How did his staff forget these facts? They didn't, they are corrupt.
Secondly, the civil servants doing this to me have sworn an Oath of Office to Obey the Law, Do No Harm, Do Not Lie, Do Not Falsify Documents, Do Not Mislead, Do Not Steal, etc, etc. So, why haven't they been fired? Because there would be an admission of wrong. Because there would be accountability. Because they have constructed me as the pariah, the Other, therefore they believe they can do what they want to me. Because this policy kills and maims so many people the politicians cannot do anything to make it public due to their knowledge of it and the condoning of it. By supporting this illegal policy, with consequences which are horrific to say the least, they have broken their Oath of Office, which means dismissal and legal action. Lying and stealing also breaches the Oath of Office. So, the politicians protect them.
How did the S G and his staff forget their Oaths of Office?
The SG had to resign due to the “Risk” of a breach of an Oath of Office, as other S Gs did. Only a Risk of impropriety forced their resignations. These civil servants have broken their Oath, there is no “Risk” of the breach, they have breached it numerous times. Why do they still have their jobs? Corruption.
And you are supposed to review and recommend their anti-diabetic policy, which is an ongoing Homicide? Genocide.
Lastly, as the diabetic drivers' policy is based upon the supposed consequences of diabetes there are also the consequences of the policy to acknowledge, just like doctors do with their interventions. However, the consequences of the policy have never been acknowledged by the senior civil servants running the policy and their supporters. Why?
They are not acknowledged because One death is an Accident.
The Second death should have seen the policy canceled.
The Third death is Homicide. Death through indifference to human life or reckless endangerment causing death.
The Fourth or Fifth death is what? A serial killer? Mass murder?
The Tenth death coming from gov't policy is only mass murder?
Do we really need to wait for the next death to come to the realization of Genocide? As the killing is based upon a government policy the genocide is defined as Democide: people that are killed in large numbers due to government policies.
Reader, how many people have died in Emerge facilities due to the Overcrowding the illegal government policy has created since I became diabetic in 1999 and have been inquiring about the policy since 2002? Hundreds. That is why your colleagues, Emerge doctors, call Press conferences about the unexpected and unexplained deaths in Emerge, only explained by Overcrowding.
How many have been maimed, crippled, or disabled due to the unexplained Overcrowding?
How many like me have had to buy their medical necessary bona fide surgery because taxes have been diverted to pay for the illegal Drivers Medical Examination and should be used for surgeries? How many have died waiting for surgery? How many are addicted to their medications due to the long surgery wait - times?
*
The Out of Court Settlement Agreement coming from my first complaint, #1954, promised changes to the demands upon diabetic drivers, changes to an existing policy. However, as stated above I was never given an original policy justifying the demands upon the diabetic drivers, that's why the policy is illegal. You've been asked to justify an illegal policy that kills.
So, what ever you are reviewing is really the First Policy not a New Policy. The HRT Decision concerning my last complaint, #5791, two years ago, lies to the readers as I am not waiting for a New Policy but waiting for “A Policy”. In other words the policy is illegal and the HRT did not acknowledge this fact in their decision. It lied to the public.
The Settlement Agreement was four years ago. The tweaking of an existing policy does not take two years, therefore my last complaint, which was two years ago. So, four years have gone by with the policy still being illegal and killing people.
So, here I am waiting for you to evaluate not only the illegal demand upon diabetic drivers but all disabled drivers. You have been used as the scapegoat to protect those running this policy that kills, maims, and threatens peoples lives. What other lies are these civil servants telling about the other disabled drivers?
Have the corrupt civil servants informed you that the policy is only based upon some civil servants “view” of life? How conveniently they have forgotten their Oath of Office.
So, not only has the OSMV used you as the scapegoat the HRT has involved you, making you, a doctor, support an illegal social policy that kills people. They used you so they did not need to make a decision about the corruption and genocide knowing full well the killing continues.
So, not only does the OSMV use you, doctors, as the scapegoat for their policy, you are used to legitimize the illegal policy through your review and recommendation until the whole Guide is complete. The HRT has used you.
So, not only do they use you, doctors, as the scapegoat for their policy, as they use Emerge doctors to inform the survivors of those that have died in Overcrowded Emerge, created by the policy. Whereas, the civil servants running the illegal policy should be in Emerge defending their policy and the deaths and maiming. You can hear them can't you, 'the emerge deaths are acceptable as all this is done to keep those needle using diabetics under control.'
Why is it that Emerge doctors are used to explain these unexpected and unexplained deaths? They are not responsible for the Overcrowding. The illegal gov't policy is; it is not acknowledge, therefore not legally funded, nor managed properly.
*
Reader, within my last complaint, #5791, the OSMV special “academic researcher”, Dr. Bonnie Dobbs, presented 174 scientific articles on diabetes and stuff to justify the diabetic policy, plus 15 articles on Thyroid.
The problem is that All or most of the articles are protected by Copyright, Intellectual Property Rights, and Intent of Use protection instruments. These are stolen from the who's who of journals.
Without permission to use the research means the articles were stolen. When I confronted the OSMV about this they lied about not knowing the Scope of the complaint therefore the large number of articles presented. This lie was put forward as damage control, with the intent to use the remaining research to justify the policy. The HRT does not mention this theft and lie. Why?
Additionally, the OSMV did not present the remaining research to justify the policy, which means they withdrew their defense of my complaint. Which means they do not contest my complaint. Therefore, the policy should have been canceled. Why doesn't the HRT acknowledge this withdrawal of the defense of the policy?
The lie about misunderstanding the scope does not make the theft of scientific research legal. The remaining 5 - 10 articles on type 2 were still stolen documents. Nazis steal and corrupt science to get their way.
What stolen research have they given you? Has Dobbs stolen research to justify other disabilities the OSMV monitors?
My point is, if I had not challenged the theft, lie, and corruption concerning this you and everyone else would have been told the policy had been legally and scientifically justified through HRT complaint #5791. However, they cannot do that can they, because I stood up to these Nazis. So, now they have you trying to justify the policy. Has Dr. Dobbs given you research, foreign research? Are there Permission Forms? Permission forms to justify a foreign social policy that kills and maims hundreds and endangers peoples lives while they wait for surgery?
Reader, what documents have they given you? Have they also been stolen?
Doctors, would you steal research to justify your position?
Justifying the policy on stolen research turns you into what?
What do the medical ethicists say about this policy and the killing? Why are they so quiet?
So, if you have nothing to support the policy and its consequences then how do you support the Emerge doctors when they need to explain the unexpected and unexplained deaths due to the gov't constructed Overcrowding, theft, and lies? What science do you use? Stolen research? Some Nazis “view” of the world?
*****
Reader, I do not care what you do for a living or for your personal life but you work through these Five Points if you are successful or want to be. You may change the language or maybe the order. Gov't certainly needs to work through this and most of the time they do, lawyers do, human rights tribunals are supposed to, most people do, I do, and so should you, Doctors. The neurosurgeon that I needed to hire to operate on me last May certainly did.
The Five Points of Engagement
1. Is the 'need' for intervention really there? Modern science says No. Is the policy a real 'need' or just a 'want'. It is a 'want' of unknown senior civil servants, based upon their “view” that it is ok to do. Sorry, Canadian civil servants' “view” of the world is not good enough to make and run policy, as there are Laws to follow and their Oath of Office 'needs' to be fulfilled. So why do it? Why do it knowing the consequences?
2. Can the 'intervention' really do what it is alleged to be able to do? No. The Driver's Medical Examination cannot predict, prevent, and manage hypoglycemia, the very reason for the policy. So why do it? Why do it knowing the consequences?
3. What are the 'consequences of the intervention'? The consequences kill and maim hundreds of naïve bystanders every year. The policy causes the Overcrowding and surgery wait - lists. The policy turns me into a pariah, the Other. The policy endangered my life. So why do it? Why do it knowing the consequences? (Read the accompanying letter “Updated Consequences”)
4. Is there 'any Good'? No. The gov't has stated it has never studied the policy for any Good. How insane is that?
If there is no documentation to justify the policy in the first instance how can there be any baseline to show change to prove Good?
Secondly, as modern science states there is no problem to begin with means the idea of Good is a false Good?
Third, if the policy is based up some “view” of some Nazi civil servants how can they prove Good? This lack of accountability defines discrimination. It exemplifies bias, prejudice, hate, ignorance, fear and loathing, disgust, and contempt for people and Laws. It defines Corrupt people. So why do it? Why do it knowing the consequences?
5. And 'Where are we now?'. Reader, for my diabetes care I visit the doctor twenty (20) times compared to the one (1) time I am forced to visit the doctor for the policy and the Driver Medical Examination, DME. This is never acknowledged by the gov't and its supporters. Why? Because it exemplifies diabetics do care for themselves and doctors care for the diabetic and there is no need for the corrupt civil servants and their discriminatory hateful policy. The acknowledgment breaks the construction of the pariah, the Other.
For my Class 4 license I visit eight (8) times to the one (1) time. Why has the policy continued on knowing this about diabetic care? Why continue knowing the killing, maiming, and negative influence upon those needing bona fide medical demands? Why has this never been acknowledged by the gov't, the Human Rights Tribunal, and the 'civil servant lawyers' attacking me instead of the illegal policy? Why are doctors and I forced to comply with the demands of an illegal policy? Why do they continue knowing the above? Hate? Lust for power? Denial of Responsibility and Accountability? Denial of Genocide? Natural born killers? They have gone to far over the Edge and they know it, therefore the charades to bury it.
Lastly, you should know that my first human rights complaint saw a change in who pays for the DME. The gov't now pays $75 for most examinations, whereas before August 2006 the diabetic or disabled driver needed to pay whatever the doctor charged for a 'non-necessary medical' examination, usually about $150.00. On the surface this is good thing but the taxes used to pay for this illegal policy and its non-necessary demands on the health care system, which offers No Good, should be used for 'necessary medical' demands, surgeries, which offer Good.
So, the shuffling of taxes to pay for the DME is to make the policy look legal, as why would the gov't pay for the demands of an illegal policy. This is just another charade, a false marriage, done to give the policy the look of legitimacy. Why indeed? Isn't the shuffling of taxes to pay for an illegal policy and its demands upon the health care system fraud? This is an example of the charades played out by the gov't and its counsel that you really need to work through as it is all done to present that the policy is legal, therefore the killing is legally justified. The $75 comes from what my doctor charged for the DME. He is forced to give the DME, knows it cannot do what it is alleged to be able to do, and does no Good, therefore he charged only half the going rate. It's called civil disobedience on his behalf.
So, you can hear the gov't, 'if that is all this doctor wanted to charge that is all they will get'. The gov't reimbursed my DME fees as part to the breached out of court settlement agreement for the discrimination complaint and that is how they came to know what he charged.
Now, All G Ps administering the DME do not get paid for their time. The people that set this up are petty and criminal and hide in bureaucracy of gov't. There is no way they do not know this policy is illegal and kills.
*****
Democide ““is a term coined by political scientist R. J. Rummel for “the murder of any person or people by a government, including genocide, politicide, and mass murder”.” (this applies to this policy)
“Democide can also include deaths arising from “intentionally or knowingly reckless and depraved disregard for life””. (this applies to this policy)
“Some examples of democide cited by Rummel include the Great Purges carried out by Joseph Stalin in the Society Union . . ., the deaths from the colonial policy of the Congo Free State, Mao Zedong's Great Leap Forward resulting in a famine which killed millions of people. According to Rummel, these were not cases of genocide, because those who were killed were not selected on the basis of their race, but were killed in large numbers as a result of government policies.”, therefore the term Democide. (this applies to this policy) (the above is from Wikipedia, Democide, pp 1– 2, 06/03/2010, which are referenced)
*
And you board members are going to support this policy and other policies against the disabled now you know how corrupt they are and the killing that is taking place? Do All doctors know how corrupt the policy is? That it is illegal? That it kills? That you doctors are being used as a buffer between the survivors and those doing the killing, the scapegoat?
Those doing this to the disabled, the public, the naïve bystanders, and doctors are not going to hate you any more if you stand up and refuse to support them. The public refusal may force these monsters to resign or be fired as the Solicitor Generals have had to do. Forcing doctors to review this policy is just another charade, just like the act of paying for the DME, which marries the payment to the policy, an illegal policy payed by taxes, which means the whole act is fraud. Your forced participation is the same, involve doctors to make it seem as if the policy is legal to begin with, which it isn't. Forced participation is a bogus endorsement.
This is no different than the review of the Drafts I offered, participation as if that acknowledges the policy to be legal. It doesn't. The Draft is so corrupt I reviewed it as now it is a document that exposes the bias, prejudice, hate, ignorance, fear and loathing, disgust, and contempt for the diabetic. That is what that charade is about. The Drafts are full of lies, misrepresentation, misleading numbers, misinterpretation, fearful language, and finishes off with someone trying to justify the policy by saying that medical conditions that may express in 10, 15, or 20 after being diagnosed with type 2 is good enough to justify the policy. Bullshit. This is what Nazis do, corrupt science, and medicine, and life to get what they want. Use threats and fear to get what they want. I'm not afraid of these Nazis scum and neither should you be. They are a cancer that needs to be cut out of the public body.
The people doing this to the public, myself, and doctors do visit doctors for health care and surgery. You cannot refuse to help these monsters, as that would turn you into them. You really need to say “No” to these corrupt people. Saying “No” is passive resistance. It is a beginning. Say “no” and see what these monsters will do. Let them lie and threaten you for all to see. Expose the killing they are doing, with your Emerge doctors being held accountable for. Expose the stolen research, as I have no doubt they have done this to you, as they have done this to me. Write the RCMP and the United Nations Genocide Department.
Stand up for yourselves, your personal health as a doctor. Stand up for doctors all over the world. Stand up for the diabetics, the disabled, the functioning illiterate that don't know the Nazis and corrupt civil servants are doing this to them. Stand up for your clients, people like me. Stand up for the Charter, the Human Rights Code, and the Motor Vehicle Act. Canada is more important than these corrupt civil servants and their hate and discrimination. Stand up for the breach of Trust society has freely given to these civil servants that they have broken. Stand up for your Oath, the Code of Ethics that demands you do no harm; this policy harms me medically, socially, economically, emotionally, and endangered my life. These are harms you do not want to be involved in. Let that be your instrument to challenge the civil servants who have breached their Oath of Office, that politicians have breached. These Nazis are challenging your Code of Ethics while forcing you to falsely support this policy. Just because they breach their Oath of Office, steal research, lie when caught, refuse to acknowledge the consequences of their actions, etc, etc, does not mean doctors need to do the same. Your forced affiliation with these people should be exposed, as it will make medicine and society a better place. Make the General Practitioners' place in medicine better, as they will not be filling out corrupt medical forms for corrupt medical examinations and maybe the G P will stop leaving the G P place in medicine.
Doctors, Refuse to endorse this prejudicial and hateful policy that makes illegal demands upon society, doctors, the disabled, our tax dollars which are needed for bona fide medical demands, and kills and maims the naïve bystander in Emerge and surgery wait - lists.
Remember the policy is illegal, the DME cannot do what is alleged to be able to do, the Nazis do not acknowledge the consequences of their policy, there is no good realized from the policy, and I already visit the doctor for diabetes care as does every diabetic taking medication and others that do not at a rate of 20 to 1. So, why support these monsters and their hate, prejudice, and illegal activities. Why run the Risk of conflict with your Code of Ethics?
False and illegal government demands upon the medical system are ruining our health care system, as they are not acknowledged, therefore not legally funded, therefore they cannot be managed. These demands take the doctors out of the medical system to fulfill these illegal demands; their hours of availability for bona fide medical needs are diminished due to these illegal demands. This refusal would help stop the Emerge Overcrowding and Emerge Admissions, help the ambulance service overcrowding, stop the abuse of the G P with the withdrawal of the hundreds of hours needed to fill out gov't forms that are not needed, which would allow the G P to practice bona fide medicine, which would decrease the wait - times to see a doctor, as they would not be filling out useless Medical Examinations and Forms for illegal gov't policy.
As the diabetic policy is illegal we must acknowledge the gov't is also making other illegal demands upon the health care system that are not funded, therefore not acknowledged, therefore not managed, therefore a deficit upon the medical system that remains an unknown conundrum not being addressed. Gov't itself is the wasteful consumer of medical care not the public.
Canada is still a working democracy, civil servants do not make policy, they do not do things because in their “view” it is ok to do. These civil servants need to be fired and held accountable for their actions, as they have breached their Oath of Office with their illegal policy, theft of research, lies, etc, etc, as Politicians have been.
Doctors are more important than corrupt civil servants and they actually do Good.
Regards
Dave Jenkins
Labels: doctor code of ethics; reviewing policy, stolen research
posted by type 2 at
2:16 PM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home