2 pp, June 16, 2010, new Solicitor General about corruption and genocide, no response

Dave Jenkins
3107 Tanglewood Way
Nanaimo, BC, V9T 5A5


June 16, 2010


Ministry of Public Safety and Solicitor General
Honourable Michael de Jong, Q. C.
PO Box 9053 Stn Prov Govt
Victoria, BC, V8W 9J7

re: letter to the past S G, August 14, 2009, his return of October 7, 2009, and my response of October 22, 2009, which was not responded to as we saw his firing or resignation then reinstatement and then firing or resignation again.


Dear Honourable Michael de Jong,

First of all, welcome to the new Office.
Secondly, as you will read my inquiry and Human Rights Discrimination complaint has not been resolved. Your staff member(s) that wrote that letter for the past Solicitor General is/are liars. The staff that wrote that response have conveniently forgot to inform readers that the policy is still illegal, not just discriminatory because the civil servants have not justified it with research or any documentation but also discriminatory because the policy has not been legally justified with any documentation, scientific documentation. Also, you need to know that the complaint cannot be renewed by me as it has been buried by the BC Human Rights Tribunal. They will not accept another discrimination complaint until the “Guide to Driving” is complete as a whole and yet it was stated that a diabetic policy had been written; therefore it should have been presented for review as I had done with the first Draft, the first Policy and second Draft. This wait could last for years and probably will, as those involved are trying to hide the consequences of their actions; running an illegal policy, homicide, maiming, endangerment of life, theft, lying, breach of Oath of Office, etc, etc.
Solicitor General, as the policy is illegal your staff needed to legally justify it with bona fide science to make it legal, therefore not discriminatory in that sense; still discriminatory as bona fide science does not prove a need for the policy. I caught your civil servants stealing scientific research to justify the policy. They then lied about there behaviour when caught. So, not only are your immediate staff liars but the all the civil servants involved in the illegal policy are thieves and liars and more. The policy has horrific consequences therefore the theft and lies, the breach of the settlement agreement, the the falsifying of documents, mail fraud, inter-provincial mail fraud, breach of Affidavit, etc, etc. They did not present the stolen science after I stepped up and declared this insanity which means the OSMV diabetic policy is still not legal therefore illegal and discriminatory. It also means the research was withdrawn, which means the OSMV withdrew it defense of my complaint. The withdrawal means they decided not to justify the policy therefore the policy should have been declared discriminatory by the HRT. Their Decision does not mention any of this. Why? So, the policy is still illegal.
Third, what we, the public, have come to learn is that the past S G resigned due to the Risk of a breach of Oath of Office or the Risk of an inappropriateness. Only the Risk was powerful enough to see him outed. What these civil servants have done to you is not acceptable. You are now involved in absolute corruption. It really is Homicide and Genocide.

Civil servants have sworn an Oath of Office to Follow the Law, Do no Harm, Do not Lie, Do not Steal, Do not Mislead, Do not Misinform, etc, etc.
So, why hasn 't what has happened to the past S Gs happened to the civil servants that are involved in this illegal policy? They know the policy is illegal, have written they know of the harm of the policy, have stolen documents, lied about that, mislead, misinform, broken the settlement agreement and refused to renew it, falsified legal documents, falsified or breached an Affidavit, etc, etc, not been fired?
It is not the politician's job to defend corrupt civil servants, they will not protect you. As the passing of six or seven S Gs, since my diagnosis of type 2 diabetes in 1999, has proved. You owe these people nothing. You owe the public everything. You owe Canada everything. They have laws to follow and they have not followed them and now you are involved in something that is absolutely corrupt which kills, maims, and endangers the life of the naïve bystander.
This diabetic drivers' policy is illegal, based solely upon some civil servants' “view” of the world. They don't have a “view”of the world to force policy upon the public. They have laws to follow and they haven't. They know the harm and have continued on with the illegal policy, hiding in government bureaucracy, only offering the response such as the last S G response to my inquiry and complaint Oct 07, 2009, “you may wish to seek the advice of legal counsel”. That response defines irresponsibility and unaccountability, just as the actions of the civil servants involved in this illegal policy and its killing. That response exemplified the corruption in the Office of the Solicitor General.

As you will read in the letter of May 07, 2010, I have sent my complaint to the RCMP, the international human rights organization Human Rights Watch, and the UN Secretary General's Special Advisor on the Prevention of Genocide and others due to the past S G letter, the Human Rights bias toward the government concerning the policy and their behaviour, and all the above.
Solicitor General, your staff, the OSMV, their 'academic researcher' stole research and their lawyers of position in society presented it in an effort to justify the policy. If I had not challenged them, had the guts to challenge the Deputy Superintendent of Motor Vehicles, which also means the Superintendent, the academic researcher, the Supervising lawyer for the Attorney Generals office, as the buck stops with her, and the lawyer from Heenan Blaikie, who she hired, you would have read the diabetic policy had been been legally justified with scientific research in the Human Rights complaint #5791. You don't read that. The policy is still illegal. It is still there killing, maiming, and endangering lives and your staff wrote my complaint has been resolved.
*
Lastly, lets say in the near future you and I are in The Hague, part of the investigation into the Genocide, Democide, coming from this illegal policy. Democide defines an act of genocide coming from people killed in large numbers as a result of government policies. The inference is that the policies are legal but in a government that has run amuck. This is an illegal policy, with government employees, governed by an Oath of Office, the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, the Human Rights Code, the Motor Vehicle Act, and our Democratic Social Contract that have run amuck, and politicians in denial of what is really going on.
Solicitor General, what would you say to the judges in The Hague that are investigating the Genocide concerning this? Are you really going to only say you wrote me and told me to get legal advice now you know about the illegal policy, the the theft of scientific research, the lies, the killing, the maiming, the endangerment of life,etc, etc?
Are you really only going to say get a lawyer? What about your responsibilities to society? The Laws of our country? The survivors of the deaths and maimed?

Solicitor General, as you are a lawyer and Q. C. I have no doubt that being part of an investigation into Genocide would be interesting to say the least.
I have no problem going to The Hague for unlimited time as I have been written of as a killer by civil servants, seen legal documents falsified, experience theft and lies by those in Trusted positions, experienced their fraud, been forced to undergo phoney medical exams that cannot do what they are alleged to be able to do, and had my life threatened. Also, the demands of the Charter have not been fulfilled, the HR Code demands have not been fulfilled and the OSMV is no stranger to the HR Code, and the OSMV changed the meaning of the Motor Vehicle Act to get its way. I caught them at that lie also.

Welcome to diabetes , discrimination, and corruption of civil servants with their bias, prejudice, hate, ignorance, fear and loathing, disgust, and contempt for the diabetic, the disabled, and the Law.
And now you are involved in all of this, a naïve bystander involved in genocide, as I have found myself involve in and you wonder why these people lie, steal documents, mislead, misrepresent, beach Affidavits, etc, etc.

Solicitor General, lets see who you really are. If you have the guts, the fortitude, grit, courage, or backbone, as a lawyer, as a lawyer Q. C., as a politician to stand up to these monsters and their killing, theft, lying, etc.

Regards,


Dave Jenkins.


Cc; the May 07, 2010 letter has also been sent to the B C Medical Association as they are supposed to be evaluating government demands upon drivers for the 'Guide to Driving'. It really is not a revised policy or updated policy, as I was never sent a policy to begin with, so in reality the OSMV is just now trying to justify all its illegal demands upon society and stole research to do so. The BCMA needs to know that the government employees involved in this have stolen science to justify the policy and then lied about it when caught. All this challenges doctors own Code of Ethics. This begs the questions, “How much research have these civil servants stolen in their effort to justify the illegal policies they force upon society?” “What threat has been used to force doctors to be involved in this corruption?”